Response to Parliamentary Committees and External Audits - DPR 2015-16
Response to Parliamentary Committees |
|
|---|---|
| Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, Chapter 3, Reserve Force Pension Plan – National Defence, of the 2011 Spring Report of the Auditor General of Canada April 2012The Standing Committee on Public Accounts examined the Office of the Auditor General of Canada chapter and made two recommendations that involved National Defence. Original report: Government response: |
|
Committee recommendation: |
|
| 2. That DND provide to the Committee a progress report on the status of the pension plan file backlog at the end of each calendar year, in order to determine if DND remedial actions have been effective to date and to determine if the 2017 target date for closing the pension backlog is achievable. | |
Government response: |
|
| Reservists are a vital part of the Canadian Armed Forces and are instrumental to their success at home and abroad. Since the introduction of the Reserve Force Pension Plan in 2007, National Defence has worked to refine service delivery and ensure that reservists receive pension benefits comparable to those of their Regular Force counterparts. National Defence continues to address the Auditor General’s recommendations and enhance service delivery through the management action plan. Indeed, since the Committee hearing in December, the department had processed an additional 275 applications as of March 31st, 2012. Building on this momentum, the department will continue to seek efficiencies and make every effort to eliminate the backlog by 2017. The Government shares the Committee’s views on the importance of the Reserve Force Pension Plan and accepts both of the Committee’s recommendations. Accordingly, National Defence will report to the Committee on the status of all action plan items targeted for completion in 2012, and provide the first annual progress update on the status of the pension plan file backlog, by December 31st, 2012. Status Update:DND provided a progress update on the status of the pension file backlog. As of April 30, 2016, a total of 10,669 files had been completed and DND is on-track to meet the 2017 closing date. |
Response to Parliamentary Committees |
|
|---|---|
| First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, 40th Parliament, 2nd Session, “Chapter 4, Military Health Care – National Defence of the October 2007 Report of the Auditor General of Canada.” February 2009 Original report: http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/Committee/392/PACP/Reports/RP3442081/392_PACP_Rpt12/ Government response: |
|
Committee recommendation: |
|
| 2. National Defence to provide information in its annual Departmental Performance Report (DPR) on the aggregate costs of the military health care system, as well as the number of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, medical technicians and physician's assistants employed in that system. | |
Government response: |
|
| The Government accepts this recommendation. DND will report this information in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009-10 DPR. In future years, DND will also look for other ways to make this information available to the public. Status update:In FY 2015-16, the Canadian Forces Health Services consisted of over 6,000 members and employees, which included 3,035 Regular Force members (full time), 1,373 Reserve Force members (Part time) and over 1,750 employees of the Public Service (both full and part time). The clinical component of the military health care system consists of nine officer and nine non-commissioned member occupations as well as over 15 Public Service Occupational Groups. Among the clinical component, there are 315 Physicians, 132 Dentists, 545 Nurses, 103 Pharmacists, 173 Physician Assistants, and 2,405 Medical Technicians/Medical Assistants. These clinicians come from the Regular Force, the Reserve Force and Public Service. Finally, the Canadian Forces Health Services are augmented through the use of the Health Service Support Contract which provided in the order of 380 Full-Time Equivalents (FTE), which include 110 FTE Physicians. |
Response to Parliamentary Committees |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fifteenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, 39th Parliament, 1st Session, “Chapter 5 – Relocating Members of the Canadian Forces, RCMP, and Federal Public Service of the November 2006 Report of the Auditor General of Canada.” May 2007 Original report: Government response: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Committee recommendation: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. That the Department of National Defence, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and Treasury Board Secretariat include, in their annual DPR, references to the Integrated Relocation-Program as it relates to their employees. Information on the numbers of employees using the Program, the costs, and the extent to which the purposes of the Program are being achieved must be included. This performance information must be included in DPRs beginning with Reports for the period ending 31 March 2008. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Government response: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Government accepts this recommendation. Status update:The purpose of the Integrated Relocation Program (IRP) is to relocate CAF personnel and their families in the most efficient fashion and at the most reasonable cost to the public while having a minimum detrimental effect on the employee and family, and on departmental operations. In 2015-16, the following moves were coordinated through the Brookfield Global Relocation Services (GRS), by quarter:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Response to Parliamentary Committees |
|
|---|---|
| Fifteenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, Chapter 3, Mental Health Services for Veterans – National Defence and Veterans Affairs Canada, of the 2014 Fall Report of the Auditor General of Canada May 2015 The Standing Committee on Public Accounts examined the Office of the Auditor General of Canada chapter and made one recommendation that involved National Defence. Original report: Government response: Nil. |
|
Committee recommendation: |
|
| That, by 31 March 2016, Veterans Affairs Canada and the Department of National Defence provides the Standing Committee on Public Accounts with reports outlining their progress in addressing the Office of the Auditor General of Canada’s recommendations contained in Chapter 3 of the Fall 2014 Report. | |
Government response: |
|
| When Parliament dissolved for the October 2015 general election, the need for the Government to respond to the report was obviated. Status Update:Any developments regarding this report that took place after March 31, 2016, will be reported in the 2016-17 Departmental Performance Report. |
Response to Parliamentary Committees |
|
|---|---|
| Thirteenth Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, 41st Parliament, 2nd Session, “Canada and the Defence of North America” June 2015 The Standing Committee on National Defence studied Canada’s role in the Defence of North America. The Committee requested that the government table a response to the Report. Original report: http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/Committee/412/NDDN/Reports/RP8046688/nddnrp13/nddnrp13-e.pdf Government response: Nil. |
|
Committee recommendation: |
|
| The Committee report made 18 recommendations for the Department of National and the Canadian Armed Forces: |
|
Government response: |
|
| When Parliament dissolved for the October 2015 general election, the need for the Government to respond to the report was obviated. |
Response to the Auditor General (including to the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development) |
|
|---|---|
| The Department of National Defence/Canadian Armed Forces (DND/CAF) was involved in two Auditor General (AG) reports completed during FY 2015-16: Report 7 of the spring 2015 AG tabling, “Office of the Ombudsman for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces,” examined whether the Office of the Ombudsman for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces established and followed key controls, systems and practices related to human resource management, financial management and contracting in carrying out its mandate, in compliance with government legislation and policies. The AG also examined whether National Defence adequately carried out its oversight responsibilities for the Office of the Ombudsman in compliance with government legislation and policies. With respect to National Defence, the AG concluded that although National Defence carried out some monitoring responsibilities for the Office of the Ombudsman, it was not sufficient to be in compliance with government legislation and policies. There were six recommendations included in the report. Of these, two recommendations were directed at the Department of National Defence only, two were directed at the Office of the Ombudsman only, and two were jointly directed to the Department of National Defence and the Office of the Ombudsman. The recommendations can be found through the following link to the entire report: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201504_07_e_40353.html Report 5 of the fall 2015 AG tabling, “Canadian Armed Forced Housing,” examined whether the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces managed military housing in a manner that supported housing requirements, that was consistent with government regulations and policies, and that was cost-effective. The AG concluded that National Defence policy on military housing was consistent with government policy, but that the department did not comply with key aspects of its own policy with respect to clearly defining it operational requirements for military housing or consider how the private housing market could meet the needs of CAF members. In addition, the AG concluded that National Defence did not have adequate and approved plans to support the current and future needs for military housing. There were four recommendations included in the report, all directed to DND/CAF. The recommendations can be found through the following link to the entire report: http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201602_05_e_41062.html |
|
Response to external audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languges |
|
| There were no external audits by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages completed and reported in the year ending 31 March 2016. |