Hazardous substance assessment: Benzyl alcohol

Important note: Hazardous substance assessments are technical documents produced by Health Canada as educational and informational resources for suppliers of hazardous products under the Hazardous Products Act (HPA) and its regulations. For more information on supplier roles and responsibilities, visit supplier responsibilities.

This hazardous substance assessment was conducted according to the Hazardous Products Regulations (HPR).

Identification

Chemical name:

Benzyl alcohol

CAS #:

100-51-6

Chemical composition:

C7H8O

Synonyms:

Benzenemethanol
Methanol, phenyl-
Phenolcarbinol
Benzenecarbinol

UN #:

No chemical-specific UN # available

Pictogram(s):

Figure 1.
Figure 1. - Text Equivalent

The symbol within the pictogram is an exclamation mark. This symbol indicates that hazardous products with this pictogram can cause certain health effects for example:

  • skin irritation
  • eye irritation
  • skin sensitization

WHMIS classification

Health hazards:

Physical hazards:

Health hazards

Acute Toxicity (Oral):

Category 4

Oral median lethal dose (LD50): 1 570 milligrams per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg-bw) (rat)Footnote 1Footnote 2.

A study performed similarly to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Test Guideline (OECD TG) 401 in Sprague-Dawley rats (5 per sex and dose) gavaged with a dose of 1 000, 1 410, 2 000 or 2 830 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol in water reported an LD50 of 1 570 mg/kg-bw and clinical signs of lethargy, prostration, ataxia, increased respiration, half closed eyes and piloerection in all treated animalsFootnote 1Footnote 2Footnote 3.

A non-guideline study in male Wistar rats (10 per dose) gavaged with a single dose of 1 045, 1 254, 1 463, 1 467, 2 090 or 2 195 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol and observed for 14 days reported an LD50 of 1 620 mg/kg-bw. At a dose of 1 254 mg/kg-bw or higher, clinical signs of sedation, side and prone-position, bloody eyes and reduction of general condition were reportedFootnote 2.

The available data meet the classification criteria for Acute Toxicity (Oral) – Category 4 [subsection 8.1.1(1) of the HPR].

Acute Toxicity (Dermal):

Does not meet criteria

Dermal LD50: >2 000 mg/kg-bw (rabbit)Footnote 2.

A study conducted similarly to United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Office of Toxic Substances (OTS) guideline 798.1100 (Acute Dermal Toxicity) in rabbits (4 per sex) exposed to a single dose of 2 000 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol for 24 hours under occlusive conditions reported no mortality or adverse clinical signs of toxicity. The LD50 was greater than 2 000 mg/kg-bwFootnote 2.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category of Acute Toxicity (Dermal).

Acute Toxicity (Inhalation – Gases):

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a gas. The classification criteria for Acute Toxicity (Inhalation – Gases) do not apply to this substance.

Acute Toxicity (Inhalation – Vapours):

No data available

No data are available to determine whether benzyl alcohol meets the classification criteria for a category of Acute Toxicity (Inhalation – Vapours).

Acute Toxicity (Inhalation – Dusts and Mists):

Does not meet criteria

Inhalation median lethal concentration (LC50): >5.4 milligrams per litre (mg/L) (rat)Footnote 2.

In an OECD TG 403-compliant study, Wistar rats (5 per sex and concentration) were exposed to a concentration of 3.3 or 4.2 mg/L of benzyl alcohol as an aerosol for 4 hours. No mortality was reported at either concentration. Rats exposed to 4.2 mg/L showed clinical signs of piloerection and slight bradypnea. The LC50 was greater than 4.2 mg/LFootnote 2.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category of Acute Toxicity (Inhalation – Dusts and Mists).

Skin Corrosion / Irritation:

Does not meet criteria

An OECD TG 404-compliant (Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion) study in New Zealand White rabbits (n=3) exposed to 0.5 millilitres (mL) of undiluted benzyl alcohol for 4 hours under semi-occlusive conditions reported individual mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal of 0 out of 4 for erythema in 2 of the animals and 0.7 out of 4 in 1 animal (fully resolved within 72 hours) and 0 out of 4 for edema in all 3 animalsFootnote 2.

A non-guideline study in New Zealand White rabbits (n=2) exposed to 0.5 mL of undiluted benzyl alcohol for 24 hours under semi-occlusive conditions reported individual mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal of 0 out of 4 for both erythema and edema in both animalsFootnote 2.

In 2 additional studies in rabbits (n=3 and n=4) exposed to 0.5 mL of benzyl alcohol for 4 hours, primary irritation scores were 1.56 and 1.83, respectively, indicating mild irritation had occurred (maximum score of 8)Footnote 4.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category or subcategory of Skin Corrosion/Irritation.

Serious Eye Damage / Eye Irritation:

Category 2A

An OECD TG 405-compliant (Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion) study in New Zealand White rabbits (n=3) exposed to 0.1 mL of undiluted benzyl alcohol for 24 hours (rinsed) reported individual mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours post-instillation of 1 out of 4 for corneal opacity in all 3 animals, 0 out of 2 for iritis in 2 animals and 0.3 out of 2 in 1 animal, 2 out of 3 for conjunctival redness in all 3 animals, and 1 out of 4 for chemosis in 1 animal and 0.7 out of 4 in 2 animals. Some effects persisted at day 14 but all were fully reversible within 21 days of observationFootnote 2. The results meet classification criteria for Eye Irritation – Category 2A.

Another OECD TG 405-compliant study in New Zealand White rabbits (n=3) exposed to 0.1 mL of undiluted benzyl alcohol (unrinsed) reported individual mean scores over 24, 48 and 72 hours post-instillation of 2 out of 4 for corneal opacity in all 3 animals, 1 out of 2 for iritis in all 3 animals, 2 out of 3 for conjunctival redness in 1 animal, 2.3 out of 3 in another animal and 3 out of 3 in the third animal, and 1.7 out of 4 for chemosis in 1 animal, 2 out of 4 in another animal and 3 out of 4 in the third animal. Most effects were reversible within 11 days of observation except corneal opacity which was reversible within 18 days in 2 out of 3 rabbitsFootnote 2. The results meet classification criteria for Eye Irritation – Category 2A.

A couple of other studies in rabbits reported similar irritating effectsFootnote 2Footnote 5.

The available data meet the classification criteria for Eye Irritation – Category 2A [subsection 8.3.2(3) of the HPR].

Respiratory Sensitization:

No data available

No data are available to determine whether benzyl alcohol meets the classification criteria for a category or subcategory of Respiratory Sensitization.

Skin Sensitization:

Does not meet criteria

Humans: A number of positive skin sensitization studies with benzyl alcohol have been reported; however, the prevalence of sensitization is very low and usually seen in atopic individualsFootnote 2Footnote 6Footnote 7Footnote 8Footnote 9Footnote 10Footnote 11Footnote 12Footnote 13Footnote 14Footnote 15Footnote 16Footnote 17Footnote 18Footnote 19.

Animals: An OECD TG 429-compliant (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay) study in female CBA/Ca mice (4 per concentration) exposed to 0.025 mL of a solution of 2.5, 5, 10, 25 or 50% weight by volume (w/v) of benzyl alcohol in 1:3 ethanol:diethyl phthalate reported stimulation indices (SI) of 1, 0.9, 0.5, 0.6 and 1.2 for each concentration, respectively, and an estimated concentration needed to produce an SI of 3 (EC3) greater than 50%. This corresponds to a skin dose of greater than 12.5 milligrams per square centimetre (mg/cm2) The test substance was not sensitizing to skin at the concentrations testedFootnote 2.

A modified Draize test in male and female Hartley guinea pigs (n=10) induced intradermally and challenged both intradermally and topically 14 days later with a 0.25% and a 10% solution of benzyl alcohol, respectively, reported no positive reactions (0 out of 10 animals). The test substance was non-irritating to very slightly irritating at the concentrations testedFootnote 2Footnote 20. Several additional sensitization studies have also reported negative resultsFootnote 2Footnote 20.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category or subcategory of Skin Sensitization.

Germ Cell Mutagenicity:

Does not meet criteria

In vivo: An OECD TG 474-compliant (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test) study in male mice (6 per dose) administered a single dose of 50, 100 or 200 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol in saline solution by intraperitoneal injection did not demonstrate induction of an increased number of micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytesFootnote 21.

A non-guideline replicative DNA synthesis test in male B6C3F1 mice (4 or 5 per dose) gavaged with a single dose of 0, 400 or 800 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol in corn oil did not demonstrate induction of replicative DNA synthesis in mice hepatocytesFootnote 22.

In vitro: An OECD TG 471-compliant (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test) study in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 provided negative results with and without metabolic activationFootnote 2Footnote 23Footnote 24.

An OECD TG 476-compliant (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests using the Hprt and xprt genes) study in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells provided negative results with and positive results without metabolic activationFootnote 25Footnote 26.

A sister chromatid exchange assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells provided weakly positive results with and without metabolic activationFootnote 27.

An OECD TG 473-compliant (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosomal Aberration Test) study in Chinese hamster ovary cells provided negative results without and weakly positive results with metabolic activationFootnote 2.

Several additional in vitro studies in different cell types and using different guidelines provided mostly negative results for mutagenicity but a handful of the studies provided weakly positive or equivocal resultsFootnote 2Footnote 24Footnote 28Footnote 29Footnote 30Footnote 31Footnote 32Footnote 33Footnote 34.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category or subcategory of Germ Cell Mutagenicity.

Carcinogenicity:

Does not meet criteria.

Benzyl alcohol has not been reviewed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) or the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).

In OECD TG 451-compliant studies by the National Toxicology Program, there was no evidence of carcinogenesis in rats gavaged with a dose of 200 or 400 milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day (mg/kg-bw/day) of benzyl alcohol or in mice gavaged with a dose of 100 or 200 mg/kg-bw/day of benzyl alcohol for 2 yearsFootnote 34.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category or subcategory of Carcinogenicity.

Reproductive Toxicity:

Does not meet criteria

A non-guideline study was conducted in pregnant female CD-1 mice (50 per sex and dose) gavaged once daily with a dose of 0 or 750 mg/kg-bw/day of benzyl alcohol in distilled water from gestational day 7 to 14. Maternal toxicity was observed, as indicated by decreased body weight gain, hunched posture, tremors, inactivity, prostration, hypothermia, ataxia, dyspnoea, swollen or cyanotic abdomen and piloerection. Increased maternal mortality (19 out of 50 animals) was also noted and attributed to treatment. Significant reductions in pup body weight were reportedFootnote 2Footnote 35Footnote 36. This study was not used for classification as the developmental effect was concurrent with excessive maternal toxicity.

A non-guideline study in B6C3F1 mice and Fischer 344 rats (10 from each species per sex and dose) gavaged once daily with a dose of 50, 100, 200, 400 or 800 mg/kg-bw/day of benzyl alcohol in corn oil for 5 days per week over 13 weeks reported clinical signs of toxicity, reduced body weight gain and/or histopathological changes in the brain of parental animals starting at a dose of 400 or 800 mg/kg-bw/day but no reproductive effects at any tested doseFootnote 2.

An OECD TG 451-compliant carcinogenicity study was conducted in B6C3F1 mice and Fischer 344 rats (50 from each species per sex and dose) gavaged once daily with a dose of 100 or 200 mg/kg-bw/day (mice) or of 200 or 400 mg/kg-bw/day (rats) of benzyl alcohol in corn oil for 5 days per week over 2 years. There were no clinical signs of toxicity and no reproductive effects in the parental animalsFootnote 2Footnote 34.

An OECD TG 412-compliant (Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study) study in Sprague-Dawley rats (10 per sex and dose) exposed via nose-only inhalation to a concentration of 0, 0.041, 0.102, 0.290 or 1.072 mg/L of benzyl alcohol in aerosol or in a mixed aerosol/vapour atmosphere for 6 hours per day, 5 days per week for 4 weeks did not demonstrate any adverse clinical signs or effects on reproductive organs in parental animalsFootnote 2.

A non-guideline study in 50 pregnant female CD-1 mice administered a dose of 0 or 550 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol once daily by gavage in corn oil on gestational days 6 to 15 did not demonstrate any effects on maternal body weight and body weight gain, gestation index, average number of live pups per litter, postnatal survival or pup body weightFootnote 2.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category or subcategory of Reproductive Toxicity.

Specific Target Organ Toxicity – Single Exposure:

Does not meet criteria

Oral Route of Exposure: A non-guideline study in Sprague-Dawley rats (5 per sex and dose) gavaged with a single dose of 1 000, 1 410, 2 000 or 2 830 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol in water reported an LD50 of 1 570 mg/kg-bw and clinical signs of lethargy, prostration, ataxia, increased respiration, half closed eyes and piloerection in all treated animalsFootnote 1Footnote 2.

A non-guideline study in Osborne-Mendel rats (5 per sex and dose) gavaged with unspecified doses reported an LD50 of 1 230 mg/kg-bw with clinical signs of depression, coma and excitabilityFootnote 3.

A non-guideline study in male Wistar rats (10 per dose) gavaged with a single dose of 1 045, 1 254, 1 463, 1 467, 2 090 or 2 195 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol and observed for 14 days reported an LD50 of 1 620 mg/kg-bw. At a dose of 1 254 mg/kg-bw or higher, clinical signs of sedation, side and prone-position, bloody eyes and reduction of general condition were reportedFootnote 2.

Dermal Route of Exposure: A study conducted similarly to US EPA OTS guideline 798.1100 in rabbits (4 per sex) exposed to a single dose of 2 000 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol under occlusive conditions reported no mortality or adverse clinical signs of toxicity. The LD50 was greater than 2 000 mg/kg-bwFootnote 2.

Inhalation Route of Exposure: In an OECD TG 403-compliant study, Wistar rats (5 per sex and concentration) were exposed to a concentration of 3.3 or 4.2 mg/L of benzyl alcohol as an aerosol for 4 hours. No mortality was reported. Rats exposed to a concentration of 4.2 mg/L showed clinical signs of piloerection and slight bradypneaFootnote 2.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category of Specific Target Organ Toxicity – Single Exposure.

Specific Target Organ Toxicity – Repeated Exposure:

Does not meet criteria

Oral Route of Exposure: A 16-day study with rats and mice administered a dose of 120, 250, 500, 1 000 or 2 000 mg/kg-bw/day of benzyl alcohol in corn oil by gavage for 12 days of the 16-day period demonstrated lethargy, blood around the mouth and nose, subcutaneous hemorrhages, blood in the urinary and gastrointestinal tract and urinary bladder and death in animals at the two highest doses tested. Animals in the 120, 250 and 500 mg/kg-bw/day dose groups did not demonstrate any adverse effectsFootnote 34. The doses at which effects were observed exceed the guidance values for classification.

Rats and mice administered a dose of 50, 100, 200, 400 or 800 mg/kg-bw/day of benzyl alcohol in corn oil by gavage for 5 days per week for 13 weeks exhibited a staggering gait, respiratory difficulty and lethargy as well as lesions and necrosis of the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus at the 800 mg/kg-bw/day doseFootnote 34. This dose exceeds the guidance values for classification.

In an OECD TG 451-compliant study in rats gavaged with 200 or 400 mg/kg-bw/day or in mice gavaged with 100 or 200 mg/kg-bw/day of benzyl alcohol in corn oil for 5 days per week for 2 years, no significant signs of systemic toxicity were observedFootnote 34.

In another study, mice (10 per sex and dose) were administered a dose of 0, 160, 325, 645, 1 300 or 2 595 mg/kg-bw of benzyl alcohol once daily by gavage for 8 days. Hunched posture, piloerection, ataxia and subdued behaviour were seen in mice in the 3 highest dose groups. Animals receiving 1 300 or 2 595 mg/kg-bw/day of benzyl alcohol also became prostrate and showed signs of ataxia, body tremors, dyspnea, hypoactivity, hypothermia and polypneaFootnote 35.

A study in which rats (5 per sex and dose) received a dose of 50, 150 or 500 mg/kg-bw/day of benzyl alcohol in propylene glycol for 6 days per week for 3 weeks did not demonstrate any signs of systemic toxicityFootnote 37.

Dermal Route of Exposure: No data available

Inhalation Route of Exposure: An OECD TG 412-compliant study of Sprague-Dawley rats (10 per sex and concentration) exposed via nose-only inhalation to a concentration of 0, 0.041, 0.102, 0.290 or 1.072 mg/L of benzyl alcohol in aerosol or in a mixed aerosol/vapour atmosphere for 6 hours per day, 5 days per week for 4 weeks reported no significant signs of systemic toxicityFootnote 2.

Another OECD TG 412-compliant study in which male rats (6 per concentration) exposed to a concentration of 216 to 270 parts per million (ppm) of benzyl alcohol (physical form unspecified) for 4 hours per day for 4 weeks reported no significant signs of systemic toxicityFootnote 2.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category of Specific Target Organ Toxicity – Repeated Exposure.

Aspiration Hazard:

No data available

No human data are available and benzyl alcohol is not a liquid hydrocarbon.

Biohazardous Infectious Materials:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a microorganism, protein, or nucleic acid.

Physical hazards

Explosives:

Not evaluated*

* Explosives are excluded from the HPAand its regulations. Explosives are regulated under the Explosives Act. For more information, visit Natural Resources Canada.

Flammable Gases:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a gas. The classification criteria for Flammable Gases do not apply to this substance.

Aerosols:

Not evaluated

Classification of a hazardous product in the Aerosols hazard class is product dependent.

Oxidizing Gases:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a gas. The classification criteria for Oxidizing Gases do not apply to this substance.

Gases Under Pressure:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a gas. The classification criteria for Gases Under Pressure do not apply to this substance.

Flammable Liquids:

Category 4

Benzyl alcohol has a flash point of 93°C (closed cup)Footnote 38.

The available data meet the classification criteria for Flammable Liquids – Category 4 [subsection 7.6.1(2) of the HPR].

Flammable Solids:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a solid. The classification criteria for Flammable Solids do not apply to this substance.

Self-reactive Substances and Mixtures:

Does not meet criteria

Benzyl alcohol has a boiling point of 206°CFootnote 38. Self-reactive substances and mixtures must have a self-accelerating decomposition temperature of 75°C or less to meet the minimum classification criteria for a category of this hazard class [subsection 7.8.1(3) of the HPR].

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category of Self-reactive Substances and Mixtures.

Pyrophoric Liquids:

Does not meet criteria

Benzyl alcohol has a flash point of 93°C (closed cup)Footnote 38. Pyrophoric liquids react at room temperature.

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category of Pyrophoric Liquids.

Pyrophoric Solids:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a solid. The classification criteria for Pyrophoric Solids do not apply to this substance.

Self-heating Substances and Mixtures:

Does not meet criteria

Benzyl alcohol has a boiling point of 206°CFootnote 38, which is well above the maximum spontaneous ignition temperature of 50°C for classification [subsection 7.11.1(3) of the HPR].

The available data do not meet the classification criteria for a category of Self-heating Substances and Mixtures.

Substances and Mixtures Which, in Contact with Water, Emit Flammable Gases:

Excluded from classification

Benzyl alcohol has a chemical structure that does not contain metals or metalloids, and is, therefore, excluded from classification [paragraph 7.12.1(1)(a) of the HPR].

Oxidizing Liquids:

Does not meet criteria

Paragraph 7.13.1(1)(b) of the HPR excludes from classification any organic liquid that contains oxygen, fluorine or chlorine if those elements are chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. Benzyl alcohol contains oxygen which is chemically bonded only to carbon and hydrogen.

Oxidizing Solids:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a solid. The classification criteria for Oxidizing Solids do not apply to this substance.

Organic Peroxides:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not an organic peroxide. The classification criteria for Organic Peroxides do not apply to this substance.

Corrosive to Metals:

No data available

No data are available to determine whether benzyl alcohol meets the classification criteria for a category of Corrosive to Metals. Although compatibility information related to benzyl alcohol and stainless steel or aluminum is available in chemical resistance charts, these listings are solely a guide and require confirmation by a chemical resistance testFootnote 39Footnote 40Footnote 41.

Combustible Dusts:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a solid. The classification criteria for Combustible Dusts do not apply to this substance.

Simple Asphyxiants:

Not applicable

Benzyl alcohol is not a gas. The classification criteria for Simple Asphyxiants do not apply to this substance.

Chemicals Under Pressure:

Not evaluated

Classification of a hazardous product in the Chemicals Under Pressure hazard class is product dependent.

Regulatory and other information

Regulatory information:

Hazardous substance assessments are prepared by Health Canada as educational and information resources. Under the HPA, suppliers of hazardous products must, upon the sale or importation of a hazardous product, provide a safety data sheet and label that meet the requirements set out in the HPR.

Other information:

The information and classifications contained in these hazardous substance assessments are based on publicly available sources, such as peer-reviewed literature or reports by international bodies. New information, including proprietary information, could have an impact on the classification of substances or hazardous products containing them. It is the responsibility of the supplier to ensure the accuracy, sufficiency and reliability of their hazardous product classifications.

Last updated:

2025

Prepared by:

Workplace Hazardous Materials Bureau, Health Canada

References

Footnote 1

Proctor & Gamble Company. (1980) Initial Submission: acute oral toxicity study (LD50) of benzenemethanol in the rat with cover letter dated 072492, Hazelton Labs Europe Ltd. EPA/OTS Doc #: 88921114917, NTIS/OTS0542094.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

European Chemicals Agency (2024) Benzyl alcohol-REACH dossier. Available at: [http://www.echa.europa.eu/].

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Jenner, P. M., et al (1964) Food flavourings and compounds of related structure. I. Acute oral toxicity. Food & Cosmetics Toxicology 2(3):327–343.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

ECETOC (1995) Skin Irritation and Corrosion: Reference Chemicals Data Bank. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels, Belgium. Volume 66.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

Smyth, H. F., Jr., Carpenter, C. P. and Weil, C. S. (1951) Range-finding toxicity data: List IV. A.M.A.Archives of Industrial Hygiene & Occupational Medicine 4:119–122.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Basketter, D. A., et al (1997) The classification of skin irritants by human patch test. Food & Chemical Toxicology 35(8):845–852.

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Ada, S. and Seckin, D. (2010) Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: Is it useful to perform the cosmetic series in addition to the European standard series?. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 24(10):1192–1196.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

Bruze, M., et al (2012) Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation. Contact Dermatitis 66(3):131–136.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

de Groot, A. C., et al (1986) Contact allergy to preservatives - II. Contact Dermatitis 15(4):218–222.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Chow, E. T., Avolio, A. M., Lee, A. and Nixon, R. (2013) Frequency of positive patch test reactions to preservatives: The Australian experience. Australasian Journal of Dermatology 54(1):31–35.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Gosnell, A. L., Schmotzer, B. and Nedorost, S. T. (2015) Polysensitization and individual susceptibility to allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 26(3):133–135.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

The Scientific Committee on Consumer Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers (1999) The Scientific Committee on Consumer Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers Opinion concerning fragrance allergy in consumers. SCCNFP/0017/98 Final, pp. 1–63.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Mitchell, D. M. and Beck, M. H. (1988) Contact allergy to benzyl alcohol in a cutting oil reodorant. Contact Dermatitis 18(5):301–302.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

Guin, J. D. and Goodman, J. (2001) Contact urticaria from benzyl alcohol presenting as intolerance to saline soaks. Contact Dermatitis 45(3):182–183.

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Footnote 15

Curry, E. J. and Warshaw, E. M. (2005) Benzyl alcohol allergy: importance of patch testing with personal products. Dermatitis 16(4):203–208.

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Footnote 16

Corazza, M., Mantovani, L., Maranini, C. and Virgili, A. (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis from benzyl alcohol. Contact Dermatitis 34(1):74–75.

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Footnote 17

Mann, J., et al (2014) Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 70(5):276–281.

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Footnote 18

Jacob, S. E. and Stechschulte, S. (2008) Eyelid dermatitis associated with balsam of Peru constituents: benzoic acid and benzyl alcohol. Contact Dermatitis 58(2):111–112.

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Footnote 19

Herro, E. M., Elsaie, M. L., Nijhawan, R. I. and Jacob, S. E. (2012) Recommendations for a screening series for allergic contact eyelid dermatitis. Dermatitis 23(1):17–21.

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Footnote 20

Klecak, G., Geleick, H. and Frey, J. R. (1977) Screening of fragrance materials for allergenicity in the guinea pig I. Comparison of four testing methods. Journla of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 28:53–64.

Return to footnote 20 referrer

Footnote 21

Hayashi, M., Kishi, M., Sofuni, T. and Ishidate, M. (1988) Micronucleus tests in mice on 39 food additives and eight miscellaneous chemicals. Food & Chemical Toxicology 26(6):487–500.

Return to footnote 21 referrer

Footnote 22

Miyagawa, M., et al (1995) The in vivo-in vitro replicative DNA synthesis (RDS) test with hepatocytes prepared from male B6C3F1 mice as an early prediction assay for putative nongenotoxic (Ames-negative) mouse hepatocarcinogens. Mutation Research 343(2-3):157–183.

Return to footnote 22 referrer

Footnote 23

Zeiger, E. (1990) Mutagenicity of 42 chemicals in Salmonella. Environmental & Molecular Mutagenesis 16:32–54.

Return to footnote 23 referrer

Footnote 24

Ishidate, M. J., et al (1984) Primary mutagenicity screening of food additives currently used in Japan. Food & Chemical Toxicology 22(8):623–636.

Return to footnote 24 referrer

Footnote 25

Myhr, B., et al (1990) L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutation assay results with 41 compounds. Environmental & Molecular Mutagenesis 16:138–167.

Return to footnote 25 referrer

Footnote 26

Henry, B., Grant, S. G., Klopman, G. and Rosenkranz, H. S. (1998) Induction of forward mutations at the thymidine kinase locus of mouse lymphoma cells: evidence for electrophilic and non-electrophilic mechanisms. Mutation Research 397(2):313–335.

Return to footnote 26 referrer

Footnote 27

Zeiger, E., et al (1990) Evaluation of four in vitro genetic toxicity tests for predicting rodent carcinogenicity: confirmation of earlier results with 41 additional chemicals. :1–14.

Return to footnote 27 referrer

Footnote 28

Adams, T. B., et al (2005) The FEMA GRAS assessment of benzyl derivatives used as flavor ingredients. Food & Chemical Toxicology 43(8):1207–1240.

Return to footnote 28 referrer

Footnote 29

Florin, I., Rutberg, L., Curvall, M. and Enzell, C. R. (1980) Screening of tobacco smoke constituents for mutagenicity using the Ames' test. Toxicology 18:219–232.

Return to footnote 29 referrer

Footnote 30

Mortelmans, K., et al (1986) Salmonella mutagenicity tests II. Results from the testing of 270 chemicals. Environmental Mutagenesis 8:1–119.

Return to footnote 30 referrer

Footnote 31

McGregor, D. B., et al (1988) Responses of the L5178Y tk+/tk- Mouse Lymphoma Cell Forward Mutation Assay: III. 72 coded chemicals. Environmental & Molecular Mutagenesis 12(1):85–154.

Return to footnote 31 referrer

Footnote 32

Sasaki, Y. F., et al (2002) The comet assay with 8 mouse organs: results with 39 currently used food additives. Mutation Research 519(1-2):103–119.

Return to footnote 32 referrer

Footnote 33

Anderson, B. E. and Zeiger, E. (1990) Chromsome aberration and sister chromatid exchange test results with 42 chemicals. Environmental & Molecular Mutagenesis 16:55–137.

Return to footnote 33 referrer

Footnote 34

National Toxicology Program (1989) Toxicicology and carcinogenesis studies of benzyl alcohol (Cas No.100-51-6) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (gavage studies). NTP TR 343; NIH No.89-2599. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of HEalth, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Return to footnote 34 referrer

Footnote 35

Inveresk Research International (1983) Screening of priority chemicals for potential reproductive hazard, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Borriston Labs Inc. EPA/OTS Doc #: 83-258616; FYI-OTS-0483-0240, NTIS/OTS0000240-0.

Return to footnote 35 referrer

Footnote 36

Hardin, B. D., et al (1987) Evaluation of 60 chemicals in a preliminary developmental toxicity test. Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis, & Mutagenesis 7:29–48.

Return to footnote 36 referrer

Footnote 37

Carter, D. V., et al (1958) The Preparation and the Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties of Some Substituted Benzyl Alcohols. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 10(S1):149T–19T.

Return to footnote 37 referrer

Footnote 38

CCOHS (2015) CHEMINFO Database. Available at: [https://ccinfoweb.ccohs.ca/].

Return to footnote 38 referrer

Footnote 39

Burkert Fluid Control and Systems (2018) Chemical Resistance chart. Available at: [https://www.burkert.com/en/content/download/9318/file/Chemical-Resistance-Chart.pdf] Cited on: 2025.

Return to footnote 39 referrer

Footnote 40

Geotech (2024) Chemical Compatibility Table. Available at: [https://www.geotechenv.com/Reference_Pages/chemical_compatibility_table.pdf] Cited on: 2025.

Return to footnote 40 referrer

Footnote 41

United Filtration Systems (2025) Chemical Compatibility Chart. Available at: [https://unitedfiltration.com/wp-content/uploads/chemical-compatibility-chart.pdf] Cited on: 2025.

Return to footnote 41 referrer

Page details

2026-03-31