Adlib by Axiell ALM - Evaluation

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

About this evaluation

This evaluation was performed on February 15, 2018 with a representative from Axiell. It was evaluated by five members of the museum community and reflects their personal opinion. These evaluations were based on a set list of tasks in a limited period of time. It is always recommended that you request a demonstration of any product in which you may be interested based on your specific requirements.

Evaluator ratings

The following table shows the ratings given to this software by members of the museum community. To understand what these ratings mean, please refer to our Scoring System & Evaluation Guide.

Each rating given is scored out of a maximum of five points. The larger the Standard Deviation number, the wider the range of scores for that task.

Task Average Standard Deviation
Online data entry 4.2 0.84
Publish a record to the web 3.6 0.55
Set user permissions and groups 3.4 0.55
View audit trails or change log 3.2 0.84
Import data 3.6 0.55
Export data 3.6 0.55
Create a local terminology list 3.6 0.55
Upload or attach images and files 3.6 0.89
Catalogue an object 3.4 0.55
Batch modify a set of records 3.2 0.84
Multilingual capabilities 3.6 1.34
Customize a catalogue entry page 3.2 0.45
Create a template record 2.2 1.48
Generate and/or build a report 3.2 0.84
Perform basic search 3.4 0.89
Perform advanced search 3.6 0.55
Browse records 3.8 0.84
Create an exhibit 3.4 0.55
Enter condition report information 3.2 0.45

Evaluator comments

The following comments have been provided by our evaluators after they rated the performance of each task. These are selected comments drawn from the "Additional Comments" section of the evaluation form.

  • Old design.
  • A very good system! One of my favourites. The interface is user friendly and aesthetically appealing, while the ability to choose a designer that meets your specific needs is very efficient.
  • Their products seem outdated and to come from a previous computer generation.
  • With 75-80% ability to work through the browser application, I would choose this option over the back end application. I found the multiple tabs and pop-up boxes to be a bit overwhelming; however, there were some good built-in quality control features.
Report a problem or mistake on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, contact us.

Date modified: