Home Child Care Provider Pilot and Home Support Worker Pilot: Assessing the application against selection criteria

This section contains policy, procedures and guidance used by IRCC staff. It is posted on the department’s website as a courtesy to stakeholders.

The Home Child Care Provider Pilot and the Home Support Worker Pilot are closed to new applications as of June 18, 2024. Complete applications that were received on or before June 17, 2024, will continue to be processed.

Applicants should be assessed against the pass and fail selection criteria below, based on the information and documents provided in the application. Applicants must meet the following criteria to be approved:

In addition, applicants must provide proof of either of the following:

On this page

Education

The applicant must provide evidence that they have either of the following completed items:

Canadian credentials

A post-secondary Canadian educational credential is any post-secondary diploma, certificate or credential that is issued on the completion of a Canadian program of study or training at an educational or training institution that is recognized by the provincial authorities responsible for registering, accrediting, supervising and regulating such institutions. As such, an applicant who has started a college or university program and has successfully completed the credits for 1 year of that program, but who has not yet completed the program of study, would not meet this requirement.

Foreign credentials

For applicants with a foreign educational credential, the ECA report must

An ECA report stating the foreign credential is equivalent to a number of years of study may or may not demonstrate an equivalency to a completed Canadian educational credential. Officers can refer to the ECA conversion table to determine the equivalency for years of study.

If the years of study do not equate to an entry-to-practice professional degree or other outcome in the table, the officer can document this in the case notes as follows:

“The applicant’s ECA did not establish equivalency to any completed Canadian educational credential such as a degree, diploma or certificate.”

Equivalency assessments will include an assessment by the designated organization of the authenticity of the applicant’s completed foreign educational credentials.

Note: This assessment provided by the designated organization is not conclusive evidence of the authenticity of the foreign educational credentials. If an officer has concerns about the authenticity of an applicant’s foreign educational credentials, they must communicate these concerns to the applicant, afford them an opportunity to respond to those concerns and provide additional information or documentation.

Qualifying work experience

On June 16, 2024, the ministerial instructions (MIs) were amended, mainly

  • to reduce the work experience requirement from 12 months to 6 months
  • for the Gaining experience category, to
    • accept work experience gained outside of Canada
    • accept work experience gained up to 36 months before the application for permanent residence is made, until the date that the applicant demonstrates having acquired the work experience
    • clarify that applicants have only 1 opportunity to submit their proof of work experience to IRCC for a decision on their permanent residence application

This applies to all applications processed from June 16, 2024, onwards, regardless of their receipt date (pre- or post-MI amendments), provided that no final decision has already been made.

The MIs had previously been amended to update the work experience requirement from 24 months to 12 months, on April 30, 2023.

The applicant will be assessed for qualifying work experience once they have submitted proof of this requirement. The assessment will take place either up front in their initial permanent resident application (for Category B) or after an occupation-restricted open work permit (OROWP) is issued through one of these pilots (for Category A) (unless they provide sufficient proof of eligible work experience before the OROWP is issued).

Officers may sometimes become aware of situations where a caregiver has experienced abuse in the workplace. Where such a situation is known, officers must be careful not to penalize the victim or put them at further risk when interacting with the applicant or employer. Being aware that a client is a victim of abuse may impact how the application is processed and its outcome. Refer to guidance on how to address cases where a person has experienced abuse.

Applicants in the Gaining experience category (Category A)

Applicants who are otherwise eligible but who did not have the qualifying work experience at the time of their application for permanent residence will receive an OROWP. As of June 16, 2024, not only Canadian, but also foreign work experience, or a mix of both, can count as qualifying work.

Deadline for sending IRCC proof of work experience

Within 36 months of the OROWP being issued, the applicant must submit proof of at least 6 months of full-time work experience.

Where the applicant does not take the necessary steps to obtain the OROWP, they must demonstrate that they have met the work experience requirements within 36 months of the date of the stage 1 eligibility approval letter.

Applicants have only 1 opportunity to submit their proof of work experience to IRCC for a decision, as per subsection 2(3.02) of the MIs; once a decision is made, the permanent residence application is closed. 

Timeline of the work experience

The work experience for Category A will only count if it was obtained between the 36‑month period before the application for permanent residence was made and the date on which the applicant submits the proof.

Note that this timeline applies to all applications that were not finalized as of June 16, 2024. Prior to then, the work experience needed to have been gained in the 36 months before they submitted proof, as per the MIs in force at the time.

Note: Some applicants may already have some qualifying Canadian or foreign work experience when they receive an OROWP. They can count this experience toward the 6-month requirement, as long as they demonstrate that the experience was acquired during the allowed timeline as described above.

Applicants in the Direct to permanent residence category (Category B)

Applicants with the required qualifying Canadian work experience at the time of application submit their proof of qualifying work experience upfront in their application for permanent residence. The applicant must demonstrate that they have obtained a total of at least 6 months of eligible full-time work experience in Canada in the 36 months preceding the time of application.

Note: Foreign work experience is not accepted as qualifying work under Category B.

Qualifying work

To qualify, the applicant must show that they have performed full-time paid work in the occupation for at least 6 months, when they were not full-time students or self‑employed.

For work experience gained in Canada, applicants must have had temporary resident status and work authorization during the period of work experience. Only authorized work will be counted toward the work experience requirement. The authorized work experience may be acquired under any combination of authorized work permits and other authorizations to work (including maintained status or public policy).

Note: As per paragraph R185(b), an officer may impose specific conditions on a temporary resident, including the work they are both permitted to engage in or prohibited from engaging in while in Canada. If an applicant’s work permit has remarks that they are not authorized to work in child care or health services field occupations, any work that they undertake as a home child care provider or home support worker would be considered unauthorized. These conditions would typically be imposed on individuals who have not undergone a medical examination, to ensure they do not take a job that requires close contact with people, such as care for children, the elderly and the disabled, in order to protect public health.

Experience working for a business can also be counted as qualifying work experience (provided it meets the other requirements). It is only for the job offer requirement that businesses are not eligible employers.

Full-time work means at least 30 hours of paid work per week. Part-time work does not count towards calculating the 6 months of required employment (if it is below 30 hours of paid work per week). However, if an applicant is working more than 1 job concurrently in the same National Occupational Classification (NOC), and the total hours of these jobs add up to at least 30 hours per week, it can be counted.

To qualify, an applicant must have obtained work experience in an eligible occupation listed in the NOC:

Note: In 2016, Employment and Social Development Canada and Statistics Canada replaced NOC 2011 with NOC 2016, and on November 16, 2022, NOC 2016 with NOC 2021. Applications received under the Home Child Care Provider Pilot or Home Support Worker Pilot must be assessed against the edition of the NOC that was in force at the time that the application for permanence residence was received.

This means that all applications received on or before November 15, 2022 must demonstrate that they meet the requirements specified in the NOC 2016 occupational description and that applications received on or after November 16, 2022 must demonstrate that they meet the requirements specified in the NOC 2021 occupational description, irrespective of the coding of their work permit.

For example, a caregiver who applied under Category A on or before November 15, 2022, and consequently received an occupation-restricted open work permit would be assessed as per NOC 2016 once they eventually provide proof of their work experience – even if this proof is submitted on or after November 16, 2022. However, a caregiver who applies under Category B on or after November 16, 2022, would be assessed under NOC 2021 – even if they previously held a work permit issued under a NOC 2016 occupation.

For the periods of work experience claimed in the application, all applicants must demonstrate they performed both of the following:

Breaks in work experience

Applicants do not have to be employed at the time they apply for permanent residence through the Home Child Care Provider Pilot or Home Support Worker Pilot.

Work experience does not need to be continuous to qualify, but the period of 6 months of required employment must not include

A reasonable period of vacation time will be counted towards meeting the work experience requirement. For example, a 2-week period of paid vacation leave within a given 52-week period in which the applicant was engaged in qualifying work would qualify, whether that period of vacation was taken in Canada or outside Canada.

Any periods of self-employment or periods of employment during which the applicant was engaged in full-time study will not be included when calculating the period of qualifying work experience. This applies to both Canadian and foreign experience.

If there is a period of overlap (for example, between the applicant’s study permit and work permit in the case of experience gained in Canada), the applicant should provide evidence to demonstrate that at the time they acquired their full-time work experience, they were not engaged in full-time study. For instance, they could provide a school transcript and proof of program completion to demonstrate that the work experience was acquired after they completed full-time studies. Any work experience acquired before full-time study program completion (that is, during academic breaks) does not qualify.

Assessing work experience

The applicant is required to provide sufficient evidence to satisfy the officer that the requirements have been met.

Standard of proof

The standard of proof the officer must use to make a decision is the balance of probabilities, meaning that the probability or likelihood of something being true is more than 50%.

Officers are expected to review the evidence to ensure its coherence and proper alignment. Documents should be cross-referenced for contradictions and inconsistencies between the documents and what the applicant is claiming, incompleteness in the documents such as whether the employment letter was properly signed and dated, etc.

Supporting documents

A list of the documents that clients may submit to substantiate their Canadian or foreign work experience is provided on the website. Officers may also request additional documents.

Documents that applicants can provide may include, but are not limited to

GCMS workaround for the reduction of the work experience to 6 months

As the original MIs required 24 months of work experience, if a shorter period is entered in the “Eligibility – Work experience” screen, the system will prevent the officer from passing eligibility with only 6 months of work experience.

As a workaround:

  1. The officer can enter an artificial time period under the “work experience” tab that will bring the total to at least 24 months.
  2. The officer must also add a case note indicating that they entered the period in GCMS as a workaround and include the actual period declared by the client as their qualifying work experience. The officer can use the following note:

The client’s claimed work experience occurs between [insert YYYY-MM to YYYY-MM]. As a workaround to trigger GCMS to accept a positive eligibility decision with 6 months of work experience, a placeholder line in the work experience tab was added with the dates [YYYY-MM to YYYY-MM], which do not and are not intended to reflect the information in the application.

Additional requirements for applicants under Category A (Gaining experience)

Applicants in this category must also provide proof of both of the following:

Job offer

Note: If the applicant submits proof of Canadian work experience before IRCC issues the OROWP and the work experience is eligible, officers can process and approve applications without assessing (a) the job offer, (b) the likelihood that they will accept the job, and (c) their ability to perform it. See the exemption below. Note that this exemption does not apply to applicants who provide foreign work experience or a mix of Canadian and foreign experience.

Transition to NOC 2021 

Officers shall be facilitative during the transition period. If the application was submitted under NOC 2021 and the offer of employment continues to list a NOC 2016 code, the offer of employment remains valid as long as it continues to meet program requirements under the Home Child Care Provider Pilot or Home Support Worker pilot.

Where applicants did not have the required amount of eligible work experience at the time of their initial application for permanent residence (and unless they are exempt from it), they must demonstrate that they have obtained a job offer which they are likely to accept that is

An employer who is expecting a child can provide a job offer to hire a caregiver and start the process in advance of the birth. The officer may request additional information (such as proof of birth) at a later date, if needed, to verify that the employer has a genuine need for a caregiver.

The job offer must also describe the work and duties to be performed by the applicant. These duties must align with the actions described in the lead statement for the eligible occupation, as set out in the occupational descriptions of the NOC.

The initial job offer must be submitted in the form of the Offer of Employment [IMM 5983] (PDF, 2.3 MB).

Note: The main duties of the job cannot be for foster parent or housekeeper occupations.

Job offer that is no longer valid

In the course of processing, we may become aware that an applicant’s job offer is no longer valid for any reason, including that the employer no longer requires home care. Before proceeding with a refusal for not meeting the job offer requirement, the applicant should be offered a reasonable opportunity of at least 3 or 4 months to find a new employer.

Job offer from a relative

All circumstances of the application must be reviewed to support an assessment of the eligibility and genuineness of the job offer and the employer–employee relationship.

The same level of scrutiny applies if the employer is a relative, as it does for any other job offer. A reminder that an applicant being related to their employer does not make them ineligible under the pilots.

Assessing whether a job offer is genuine

Offers of employment must undergo a genuineness assessment to ensure that caregivers are protected and that the integrity of the program is maintained.

Officers may consider a number of factors when assessing whether the job offer is valid and genuine, including, but not limited to:

Specifically, officers may consider:

To assess the validity of the job offer, officers can request further information from the employer and use information provided in the job offer. For example, officers can assess whether the employer is financially able to pay the caregiver the salary described in the job offer or if there is a genuine need for a caregiver by examining

Officers may refer to low income cut-offs (LICOs) as a point of reference when assessing the employer’s ability to pay the caregiver’s salary, which can serve as a reasonable indicator, though not a determining factor. In this case, the LICOs relative to the community size where the employer resides should be used, and the full household income can be taken into consideration. Apart from income and LICOs, other financial information may also be taken into consideration, for example, in the case of seniors wanting to devote a portion of their savings on care services.

Note: The individual receiving care may be a Canadian citizen, a permanent resident or a temporary resident. However, as with all job offers, the applicant must demonstrate that it is genuine and likely to still be valid once the applicant is issued the initial OROWP. Therefore, the status of the person for whom care is needed in Canada may be taken into consideration when assessing whether or not an offer of employment is valid and genuine.

For example, in the case of assessing the genuineness of a job offer to care for someone who is on a super visa and to determine whether the need for a caregiver is justified, the officer might consider the length of time that the person receiving care can remain in Canada and whether their status will still be valid at the time of issuance of the OROWP. The officer might also consider whether they have applied or could be eligible for an extension, keeping in mind that only 6 months of eligible work experience is required (for the applicant). Having a serious medical condition could potentially affect the eligibility for a super visa extension or re-entry to Canada. Additionally, the officer will assess the financial ability of the employer to pay the caregiver’s wages, but might also take into consideration the cost of emergency health insurance required under the super visa, the premium of which could be considerable for serious medical conditions. Each application should be assessed on a case-by-case basis with the information available to the officer at the time of decision.

Where there are concerns with the job offer, we would rely on the current work-sharing arrangements with the Domestic Network (DN) and International Platform Branch (IPB) if further review of an application is required.

Ability to perform the work

Note: If the applicant submits proof of Canadian work experience before IRCC issues the OROWP and the work experience is eligible, officers can process and approve applications without assessing (a) the ability to perform the work, (b) the job offer, and (c) the likelihood that they will accept the job. See the exemption below. Note that this exemption does not apply to applicants who provide foreign work experience or a mix of Canadian and foreign experience.

Applicants who have not obtained at least 6 months of qualifying Canadian work experience must demonstrate that they are able to perform the work described in the lead statement of the occupational description of the NOC in force at the time of receipt of their application for permanent residence.

Failure to do so may result in a refusal.

Note: Foster parents are excluded from NOC 4411 under NOC 2016, and NOC 44100 under NOC 2021 and housekeepers are excluded from NOC 4412 under NOC 2016. For applications received after November 16, 2022 (with the implementation of NOC 2021), this explicit exclusion of housekeepers is no longer necessary, as the definition of the NOC has changed, and housekeepers are not included under NOC 44101).

Supporting documentation

When assessing an applicant’s ability to perform the work, officers can refer to supporting documentation provided in the application. This may include, but is not limited to,

When an officer has serious concerns regarding an applicant’s ability to perform the work, the officer must follow procedural fairness.

Note: Applicants who are applying with less than 6 months of qualifying work experience (Category A) and have met the eligibility requirements relating to education, language, job offer and ability to perform the work must be assessed for admissibility before being issued an occupation-restricted open work permit and being assessed for qualifying work experience.

Exemption from the Category A offer of employment assessment

Certain Category A applicants are not required to have a valid job offer that they are likely to accept, nor proof that they are able to perform the duties in cases where

This exemption only applies to applicants who gained all their qualifying experience in Canada. It does not apply to applicants with foreign work experience, nor a mix of foreign and Canadian work experience.

Therefore, once officers have determined that the Canadian work experience is eligible, the job offer assessment is not required, and officers can perform their assessment as if it were a Category B application. However, as it is still a Category A application, the application category must not be changed in GCMS.

Note: In the GCMS “Eligibility – Stage 1” assessment criteria window, the officer will still need to artificially set the job offer and ability to perform work fields as “Met”. Case notes should be added to indicate that the applicant was exempt and, as such, the assessment was not performed.

If the applicant meets all eligibility requirements (language, education, work experience), and provided they are eligible for it, a bridging open work permit (BOWP) should be issued instead of the OROWP while they wait for the admissibility assessment and final decision.

If the work experience on file before the issuance of the OROWP is found to be ineligible, the officer should follow the instructions on refusing the permanent residence application.

Note: If the proof of experience is received after the OROWP is issued, then the normal process applies.

More details can be found in the instructions Making a final decision – Proof of work experience received before an OROWP decision.

Learn more

Page details

2025-12-09