Conditional Release Decisions
Official Title: Performance Monitoring Report 2017-2018, Conditional Release Decisions
From: Parole Board of Canada
Conditional Release Decisions: Decision Trends
This section provides information on the following operational areas of the Board:
- temporary absence;
- day parole;
- full parole;
- statutory release;
- detention;
- long-term supervision;
- appeals.
Temporary Absence
This section contains information on the temporary absence decisions rendered by the Board.
Temporary absences (TAs) are used for several purposes, such as: medical, compassionate and personal development for rehabilitation. Under the CCRA, the Parole Board of Canada has the authority to authorize unescorted temporary absences (UTAs) for offenders serving a life sentence for murder, an indeterminate sentence, or a determinate sentence for an offence set out in schedule I or II. CSC has authority for all other UTAs. The CCRA also allows the Board to delegate its UTA authority to the Commissioner of CSC or to institutional heads. This has been done for all scheduled offences, except where the schedule I offence resulted in serious harm to the victim, or was a sexual offence involving a child.
Since the adoption of Bill C-483 (An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (escorted temporary absence)) on December 16, 2014, PBC must approve/authorize all ETAs for offenders serving life as a minimum sentence until the first successful ETA after day parole eligibility. CSC retains the authority to grant ETAs for medical reasons, to attend judicial proceedings or coroner’s inquests for these offenders. CSC has a delegated authority for ETAs for other offenders.
- As a result of Bill C-483, the number of ETA release decisions rendered by the PBC more than tripled in 2015/16 (to 574 from 177 in 2014/15). The number decreased in 2016/17 to 498 (-13%) and further to 471 in 2017/18 (-5%).
- In 2017/18, the Board rendered 419 UTA release decisions, a decrease of 22% when compared to 2016/17.
Figure 15. Temporary Absence Release Decisions
Text equivalent of Figure 15 – Temporary Absence Release Decisions
ETA | UTA | |
2013/14 | 149 | 602 |
2014/15 | 177 | 476 |
2015/16 | 574 | 551 |
2016/17 | 498 | 539 |
2017/18 | 471 | 419 |
Figure 16. Approval/Authorization Rates
Text equivalent of Figure 16 – Approval/Authorization Rates
ETA | UTA | |
2013/14 | 77% | 82% |
2014/15 | 80% | 76% |
2015/16 | 84% | 85% |
2016/17 | 83% | 88% |
2017/18 | 89% | 83% |
- The ETA approval/authorization rate increased from 83% in 2016/17 to 89% in 2017/18.
- Over the last five years, the Atlantic region reported the highest ETA approval/authorization rate (95%), while the Prairie region, the lowest (72%).
- The UTA authorization rate decreased to 83% in 2017/18 from 88% in 2016/17.
- Over the last five years, the Prairie region reported the highest UTA authorization rate (89%), while the Pacific region, the lowest (56%).
- The five-year average ETA approval/authorization rate for male offenders was higher than for female offenders (85%; 79%), while the five-year average UTA authorization rate was higher for female offenders (81%; 92%).
- The five-year average ETA approval/authorization rate for Indigenous offenders was six percentage points lower than the rate for non-Indigenous offenders (80% v. 86%). The five-year average UTA authorization rate was ten percentage points higher for Indigenous offenders than for non Indigenous offenders (89%; 79%).
- Over the last five years, almost all (99.8%) ETA release decisions rendered by the Board were decisions for offenders serving life sentences with an average ETA approval rate of 84%.
- UTA decisions for lifers accounted for 71% of all UTA decisions rendered by the Board over the last five years, with an average UTA authorization rate of 83%.
Table 40. Approval/Authorization/Renewal Rates for Temporary Absences (%)
Year | Atlantic | Quebec | Ontario | Prairies | Pacific | Canada | ||||||
ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | |
2013/14 | 91 | 59 | 81 | 90 | 78 | 58 | 56 | 90 | 100 | 51 | 77 | 82 |
2014/15 | 77 | 92 | 75 | 72 | 91 | 58 | 76 | 83 | 72 | 57 | 80 | 76 |
2015/16 | 97 | 62 | 97 | 87 | 79 | 65 | 72 | 92 | 90 | 55 | 84 | 85 |
2016/17 | 98 | 95 | 92 | 97 | 85 | 80 | 73 | 92 | 78 | 49 | 83 | 88 |
2017/18 | 100 | 93 | 88 | 91 | 90 | 73 | 80 | 85 | 92 | 68 | 89 | 83 |
5-year average | 95 | 79 | 89 | 87 | 84 | 67 | 72 | 89 | 86 | 56 | 84 | 83 |
Note: Includes only cases where the Board made a decision to approve/authorize/renew or to not approve/authorize the absence.
Table 41. Approval/Authorization/Renewal Rates for Temporary Absences by Offence Type (%)
Year | Murder | Schedule I-Sex | Schedule I- non-sex |
Schedule II | Non-Scheduled | |||||
ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | |
2013/14 | 78 | 83 | - | 67 | 0 | 84 | - | - | - | 50 |
2014/15 | 80 | 77 | - | 73 | - | 73 | - | - | - | 0 |
2015/16 | 85 | 83 | - | 92 | 60 | 86 | - | - | - | - |
2016/17 | 83 | 89 | 100 | 89 | 100 | 85 | - | - | - | 100 |
2017/18 | 90 | 83 | - | 93 | 67 | 78 | - | - | 100 | 83 |
5-year average | 84 | 83 | - | 85 | 68 | 81 | - | - | - | 64 |
Note: Includes only cases where the Board made a decision to approve/authorize/renew or to not approve/authorize the absence.
Table 42. Approval/Authorization/Renewal Rates for Temporary Absences by Indigenous and Race (%)
Year | Indigenous | Asian | Black | White | Other | |||||
ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | |
2013/14 | 75 | 89 | 67 | 88 | 67 | 63 | 79 | 79 | 100 | 63 |
2014/15 | 80 | 85 | 50 | 47 | 100 | 79 | 80 | 72 | 67 | 67 |
2015/16 | 80 | 91 | 81 | 75 | 79 | 78 | 87 | 81 | 94 | 75 |
2016/17 | 76 | 90 | 82 | 71 | 85 | 80 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 50 |
2017/18 | 87 | 87 | 88 | 71 | 94 | 74 | 90 | 82 | 100 | 55 |
5-year average | 80 | 89 | 82 | 72 | 85 | 74 | 86 | 80 | 92 | 59 |
Note: Includes only cases where the Board made a decision to approve/authorize/renew or to not approve/authorize the absence.
Table 43. Approval/Authorization/Renewal Rates for Temporary Absences by Gender (%)
Year | Male | Female | ||
ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | |
2013/14 | 76 | 79 | 81 | 94 |
2014/15 | 81 | 74 | 79 | 93 |
2015/16 | 86 | 85 | 67 | 86 |
2016/17 | 83 | 87 | 81 | 96 |
2017/18 | 89 | 82 | 95 | 89 |
5-year average | 85 | 81 | 79 | 92 |
Note: Includes only cases where the Board made a decision to approve/authorize/renew or to not approve/authorize the absence.
Table 44. Approval/Authorization/Renewal Rates for Temporary Absences by Sentence Type (%)
Year | Lifer | Other Indeterminate | Determinate | |||
ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | ETA | UTA | |
2013/14 | 77 | 83 | - | 82 | - | 79 |
2014/15 | 80 | 77 | - | 67 | - | 72 |
2015/16 | 84 | 83 | 100 | 100 | - | 86 |
2016/17 | 83 | 89 | 100 | 83 | - | 89 |
2017/18 | 89 | 83 | - | 95 | - | 81 |
5-year average | 84 | 83 | - | 86 | - | 82 |
Note: Includes only cases where the Board made a decision to approve/authorize/renew or to not approve/authorize the absence.
Definition: Lifers include those offenders sentenced to life as a minimum sentence or life as a maximum sentence. Other indeterminate includes dangerous offenders, dangerous sexual offenders, habitual criminals, and those offenders who are on Lieutenant Governor Warrants.
Page details
- Date modified: