Internal Audit Charter

[ PDF version ]

October 2019

Introduction

This Internal Audit Charter formally defines the purpose, authority, and responsibility of the Privy Council Office (PCO) internal audit function. It establishes the internal audit function’s position within PCO; describes accountability; provides for independence from line management; and defines the scope of internal audit activities. It is based on the 2017 Treasury Board (TB) Internal Audit Policy suite that includes the TB Policy on Internal Audit (the Policy), the Directive on Internal Auditing in the Government of Canada (the Directive), and the Institute of Internal Auditors International Professional Practices Framework.

Departments that have a reference level of more than $300M per year must have an internal audit function. Even though PCO’s reference level is less than $300M per year, the Clerk has elected, based on his discretionary authority, to maintain PCO’s internal audit function and an independent audit committee. This Internal Audit Charter is built upon provisions in the TB Internal Audit Policy that apply to departments and agencies that have a reference level of less than $300M per year but which have chosen to maintain their internal audit function and an independent audit committee.

PCO’s Audit Committee is responsible for recommending the Internal Audit Charter for approval by the Clerk.

Effective date

The Internal Audit Charter becomes effective on the date it is approved by the Clerk, replacing all former Internal Audit Charter, policy or mandate documents.

Internal audit in the Government of Canada

Internal audit in the Government of Canada is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization’s operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance processes. PCO’s internal audit function provides assurance services that are intended to assist PCO decision-makers in exercising oversight and control and in applying sound risk management.

Accordingly, the level of assurance provided by an auditor is the level of confidence the auditor has in the appropriateness of his or her conclusions. Assurance services are objective examinations of evidence for the purpose of providing an independent assessment on the risk management, control and governance processes within an organization. Consulting services are designed to add value and improve an organization’s operations.

Code of ethics

PCO’s internal audit function observes the code of ethics of the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). The principles of integrity, objectivity, confidentiality and competency guide the work of PCO’s internal audit function.

Independence

To ensure the independence and objectivity of PCO’s internal audit function, its personnel report to the Chief Audit Executive (CAE), who in turn reports directly to the Clerk. Functionally, the CAE reports to the Clerk through the Deputy Clerk’s Office. To ensure this objectivity and independence are maintained, any audits conducted on functions for which the Chief Audit Executive is responsible (which are PCO’s Internal Audit and Evaluation functions) will be conducted by either an external auditor or by a contracted third party.

Authority

The authority of PCO’s internal audit function flows both from the 2017 TB Internal Audit Policy and from the Clerk’s decision to maintain PCO’s internal audit function and an independent audit committee. In this regard, the Clerk will:

Responsibility

PCO’s Chief Audit Executive, supported by the internal audit staff, is responsible for:

Internal audit suite of services

The internal audit function will meet or exceed requirements of the TB’s Policy on Internal Audit and Directive on Internal Auditing, and will ensure its activities conform to the Institute of Internal Auditors International Professional Practices Framework. In addition to assurance services, the internal audit function will undertake Targeted Control Audits and provide consulting services which will include, Reviews, Lessons Learned, Risk Management Support, Advice and miscellaneous consulting engagements.

Quality Assurance Improvement Program

PCO’s internal audit function maintains a Quality Assurance Improvement Program (QAIP) which ensures that work is performed in accordance with the Internal Audit Charter and conforms with the IIA’s definition of internal auditing, Standards and Code of Ethics. The QAIP further ensures that the internal audit function operates in an efficient and effective manner and is perceived by its stakeholders as adding value.

Approval

Original signed by Abdillahi Roble
Recommended by PCO’s Chief Audit Executive

Original signed by Munir Sheikh
Recommended by PCO’s Audit Committee Chair

Original signed by Ian Shugart
Approval by the Clerk of the Privy Council

Key definitions

"risk management," "control" and "governance"
The Treasury Board Policy on Internal Audit recognizes the definitions for the terms "risk management," "control" and "governance" included in The International Professional Practices Framework published by the Institute of Internal Auditors.
Risk Management
A process to identify, assess, manage, and control potential events or situations to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of the organization's objectives.
Control
Any action taken by management, the Clerk, and other parties to manage risk and increase the likelihood that established objectives and goals will be achieved. Management plans, organizes, and directs the performance of sufficient actions to provide reasonable assurance that objectives and goals will be achieved.
Governance
The combination of processes and structures implemented by management (and the Audit Committee) to inform, direct, manage, and monitor the activities of the organization toward the achievement of its objectives.
Assurance
Assurance services involve the internal auditor’s objective assessment of evidence to provide opinions or conclusions regarding an entity, operation, function, process, system, or other subject matters. The nature and scope of an assurance engagement are determined by the internal auditor.
Participants in assurance services
Generally, three parties are participants in assurance services:
  1. the person or group directly involved with the entity, operation, function, process, system, or other subject matter—the process owner,
  2. the person or group making the assessment—the internal auditor, and
  3. the person or group using the assessment—the user.
Consulting
Consulting services are advisory in nature and are generally performed at the specific request of an engagement client. The nature and scope of the consulting engagement are subject to agreement with the engagement client. Consulting services generally involve two parties:
  1. the person or group offering the advice—the internal auditor, and
  2. the person or group seeking and receiving the advice—the engagement client. When performing consulting services the internal auditor should maintain objectivity and not assume management responsibility.
Report a problem or mistake on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, contact us.

Date modified: