Archived: Rapid risk assessment: Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda
In May 2026, an outbreak of the Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus was declared in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda. The overall risk to the general population in Canada remains low at this time, in line with the risk assessment conducted on May 21, 2026 (now extended to July 2, 2026). If an infected person were to arrive in Canada, transmission is expected to be limited due to established public health measures, enhanced border screening measures and because the virus requires direct contact with body fluids or tissues of infected individuals.
The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) is actively monitoring the outbreak in close collaboration with international partners, including the World Health Organization, as well as provincial and territorial public health authorities. PHAC will continue to assess the risk to Canada and provide updates if the situation or the level of risk changes.
Assessment completed: May 21, 2026 (based on information available up to May 20, 2026)
On this page
- Reason for the assessment
- Risk question
- Risk statement
- Event summary (current situation as of May 20, 2026)
- Considerations for pathogens with pandemic potential
- Risk assessment details
- Limitations, knowledge gaps, and uncertainties
- Proposed actions
- Reassessment
- Methods
- References
Reason for the assessment
Given the ongoing Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda, there is a need to assess the potential for importation and local transmission of Bundibugyo virus in Canada and overall risk to the population of Canada. This assessment will help guide appropriate public health actions, including border measures, contact tracing and risk communication, any additional preparedness measures (e.g. infection prevention and control) and a coordinated Federal, Provincial, Territorial response if needed.
Risk question
What is the likelihood and impact of Bundibugyo virus importation into Canada in connection with the ongoing outbreak in the DRC and Uganda within the next 2 weeks?
Risk statement
The overall risk level to the Canadian population of acquiring Bundibugyo virus from the ongoing outbreak in the DRC and Uganda is currently low (moderate uncertainty). Should a case be imported into Canada, transmission within Canada is expected to be limited due to established public health measures and characteristics of the virus, which is not transmissible before the onset of symptoms and requires close contact with body fluids or tissues of symptomatic or deceased cases to be transmitted.
The likelihood of importation of Bundibugyo virus into Canada in the next two weeks is low (moderate uncertainty), given the low travel volume between currently affected regions and Canada, and existing travel advisories that recommend against all travel to the outbreak-affected areas in the DRC due to ongoing safety and security concerns. The impact on an affected individual is estimated to be severe (low uncertainty), given the serious clinical manifestations of BVD, its high case fatality rate and lack of approved vaccines or antivirals.
If importation into Canada were to occur, the impact of BVD on the general population in Canada would be minor (low uncertainty), due to the limited number of secondary cases anticipated among close contacts, strong diagnostic and health system capacity, and existing protocols for outbreak response, case and contact management and infection prevention and control.
These risk levels could change if evidence were to emerge suggesting geographic expansion of the outbreak, including within currently affected countries and to countries with stronger travel links to Canada.
Event summary (current situation as of May 20, 2026)
On May 15, 2026, the Ministry of Health of the DRC declared an outbreak of Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus in the northeastern province of IturiFootnote 1. The earliest known suspected case died in Ituri province on April 20, 2026. On May 17, 2026, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC)Footnote 2, citing the potential for further international spread. The WHO currently assesses the overall public health risk posed by this outbreak as high at the national and regional levels, and low at the global levelFootnote 3.
As of May 20, 2026, 51 confirmed cases, nearly 600 suspected cases and 139 suspected deaths have been reported in the DRC across the provinces of Ituri and North Kivu, including in the cities of Bunia, Butembo, and GomaFootnote 3, indicating that undetected transmission has been ongoing for several weeks. Additional cases have been reported in Kampala, Uganda. The circulating strain appears to be genetically distinct from previous BVD outbreaks (Uganda 2007–2008, DRC 2012)Footnote 4, suggesting that this represents a separate zoonotic spillover event. There are currently no approved or licensed vaccines or specific antivirals available for Bundibugyo virus disease.
The affected region includes densely populated urban areas and has been affected by conflict, security concerns and humanitarian challenges in recent years; large mining operations in the area contribute to high population mobility. A previous Ebola disease outbreak in Ituri and North Kivu provinces, caused by Ebola virus (Orthoebolavirus zairense), involved more than 3000 cases and lasted nearly 2 years (2018-2020)Footnote 5.
Considerations for pathogens with pandemic potential
At this time, Bundibugyo virus is not considered to be a pathogen with pandemic potential. WHO has declared this event a PHEIC but has noted that this event does not meet the criteria for a pandemic emergencyFootnote 2Footnote 3. Previous outbreaks have typically been limited to a specific geographic area. Person-to-person transmission of Bundibugyo virus requires direct contact with tissue or bodily fluids from infected individuals, or contaminated surfaces. Transmission can be effectively prevented with adequate infection prevention and control measures.
Risk assessment details
| Risk component: Estimate [Uncertainty] | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Likelihood of importation into Canada: Low [moderate] |
|
Impact on infected individuals: Severe [low] |
|
Population level impact for the general population in Canada: Minor [low] |
|
Limitations, knowledge gaps, and uncertainties
The overall uncertainty in this assessment is moderate. Historically, outbreaks of similar VHFs have not resulted in importations into Canada and the potential for exposure among the population of Canada is currently low. However, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the current magnitude of the outbreak and its trajectory in the coming weeks, given that transmission has likely been ongoing for several weeks prior to detection.
Specific sources of uncertainty and knowledge gaps include:
- Information regarding the exact number of Canadian citizens and residents in outbreak-affected areas is not available. This number is expected to be small due to ongoing conflict in the country and existing advisories against travel to the DRC.
- The extent of transmission and geographic spread is currently not well understood. Given evidence of undetected transmission for several weeks, case numbers are expected to continue to increase in the coming weeks until sufficient control measures, including effective contact tracing, are implemented. If expansion of the outbreak into new geographic areas occurs, particularly to areas with stronger travel links to Canada, this could increase the level of risk.
- Canada has high capacity for VHF diagnostics and existing protocols for case and contact management and public health response, but there is some uncertainty regarding the ability to promptly detect an importation, as BVD cases have not been imported into Canada before and the clinical presentation in the early phase of disease can be non-specific.
- The clinical profile, epidemiological characteristics of BVD is expected to be similar to disease caused by other Orthoebolaviruses, although data on this specific strain is more limited as there have only been two previous outbreaks documented.
- Candidate vaccines and treatments may be deployed during this outbreak as part of clinical trials, but their impact on clinical outcomes and/or control of transmission remains uncertain.
Proposed actions
- Continue timely coordinated risk communications informing people in Canada of the Ebola disease outbreak caused by Bundibugyo virus, the level of risk, actions taken by public health authorities, concrete actions individuals can take to protect themselves if travelling to the region and what they should do if they feel sick or experience any symptoms of Ebola disease prior to or during their flight, as well as upon or after arrival in Canada.
- Continue targeted communications to healthcare professionals for awareness and readiness to support early detection, diagnosis/testing, management, and notifying public health authorities as per their protocols.
- Continue regular information sharing and discussion with Federal, Provincial, Territorial public health partners to support coordinated readiness in event of BVD importation to Canada.
- Conduct timely assessment of international Requests for Assistance to proactively identify feasible, risk-managed options for Canada to support the response and contribute to mitigating escalation and international spread, in line with Canada's global health commitments.
- Continue scientific activities to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of novel monoclonal antibody treatments and other experimental countermeasures, including drugs, vaccines, and diagnostic tests.
Reassessment
This situation is rapidly evolving and PHAC will continue to monitor the outbreak. The risk assessment team will reconvene to review new evidence suggesting a possible increase in risk for Canada or to Canadian residents in the DRC, Uganda or neighbouring countries. Examples of factors that could indicate an increased risk may include, but are not limited to, geographic expansion of the outbreak within currently affected countries and to countries with stronger travel links to Canada.
Methods
This assessment was completed by the Public Health Agency of Canada. The rapid risk assessment (RRA) methodology is based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Member State RRA toolFootnote 18. Likelihood, impact, and overall risk were estimated using previously described scales and risk matrix (see risk assessment methods page), and capacity to respond was estimated using the WHO toolFootnote 18. The overall risk level for the general population was obtained using the overall population impact estimate, as it contains the driving component of risk for the general population.
References
- Footnote 1
-
World Health Organization. Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus, Democratic Republic of the Congo & Uganda. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON602
- Footnote 2
-
World Health Organization. Epidemic of Ebola Disease caused by Bundibugyo virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda determined a public health emergency of international concern. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2026-epidemic-of-ebola-disease-in-the-democratic-republic-of-the-congo-and-uganda-determined-a-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern
- Footnote 3
-
World Health Organization. WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on Ebola outbreak in DRC and Uganda – 20 May 2026. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://www.who.int/news-room/speeches/item/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-ebola-outbreak-in-drc-and-uganda-20-may-2026
- Footnote 4
-
Initial genomes from May 2026 Bundibugyo Virus Disease Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda - Ebolavirus / Bundibugyo ebolavirus. Virological. May 18, 2026. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://virological.org/t/initial-genomes-from-may-2026-bundibugyo-virus-disease-outbreak-in-the-democratic-republic-of-the-congo-and-uganda/1032
- Footnote 5
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ebola Disease Outbreaks by Species and Size, Since 1976. Ebola. January 27, 2026. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/outbreaks/index.html
- Footnote 6
-
Global Affairs Canada. Travel advice and advisories for Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa). Travel.gc.ca. May 21, 2026. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://travel.gc.ca/destinations/congo-kinshasa
- Footnote 7
-
World Health Organization. Air travel is low-risk for Ebola transmission. Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.who.int/news/item/14-08-2014-who-air-travel-is-low-risk-for-ebola-transmission
- Footnote 8
-
Regan JJ, Jungerman R, Montiel SH, et al. Public health response to commercial airline travel of a person with Ebola virus infection - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(3):63-66.
- Footnote 9
-
Roddy P, Howard N, Van Kerkhove MD, et al. Clinical manifestations and case management of Ebola haemorrhagic fever caused by a newly identified virus strain, Bundibugyo, Uganda, 2007-2008. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52986. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052986
- Footnote 10
-
Public Health Agency of Canada. Ebola disease prevention, monitoring and surveillance recommendations. February 27, 2024. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/catmat/ebola-virus-disease-preventive-measures-monitoring-surveillance-travellers.html
- Footnote 11
-
Kaweesa RE, Katende JS, Wayesu RR, et al. Resilience and residuals beyond containment - The hidden burden of Bundibugyo Ebola virus survivorship sixteen years on: A cross-sectional observational study. New Microbes New Infect. 2026;69:101685. doi:10.1016/j.nmni.2025.101685
- Footnote 12
-
Clark DV, Kibuuka H, Millard M, et al. Long-term sequelae after Ebola virus disease in Bundibugyo, Uganda: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2015;15(8):905-912. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70152-0
- Footnote 13
-
Public Health Agency of Canada. Ebola disease: For health professionals, humanitarian aid workers. January 27, 2025. Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/ebola/health-professionals-ebola.html
- Footnote 14
-
Uyeki TM, Mehta AK, Davey RT, et al. Clinical Management of Ebola Virus Disease in the United States and Europe. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;374(7):636-646.
- Footnote 15
-
Public Health Agency of Canada. Infection prevention and control measures for Ebola disease in acute care settings. June 22, 2023. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/ebola/health-professionals-ebola/infection-prevention-control-measures-healthcare-settings.html
- Footnote 16
-
Public Health Agency of Canada. National case definition: Viral hemorrhagic fever. January 27, 2020. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/viral-hemorrhagic-fever/health-professionals/national-case-definition.html
- Footnote 17
-
Public Health Agency of Canada. Infection Prevention and Control Measures for Prehospital Care and Ground Transport of Persons Under Investigation for Ebola Disease or with Confirmed Ebola Disease. June 22, 2023. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/ebola/health-professionals-ebola/ebola-guidance-patient-transport.html
- Footnote 18
-
World Health Organization. User manual for the Member State Rapid Risk Assessment (MS-RRA) tool. Accessed May 19, 2026. https://www.who.int/southeastasia/internal-publications-detail/WHE2602262