Changes in West Nile virus in Canada

Volume 40-10, May 15, 2014: Mosquito‑borne infections

Commentary

West Nile virus in Canada: ever-changing, but here to stay

Zheng H1, Drebot MA2 and Coulthart MB1*

Affiliations

1 Centre for Food-borne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario

2 National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba

Correspondence

michael.coulthart@phac-aspc.gc.ca

DOI

https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v40i10a01

Summary

The incidence of West Nile virus (WNv) has waxed and waned in Canada over the past 12 years, but it is unlikely to disappear. Climate change models, which suggest warming temperatures and changing patterns of precipitation, predict an expansion of geographic range for WNv in some regions of Canada, such as the Prairie provinces. Such projected changes in WNv distribution might also be accompanied by genetic changes in the virus and/or the range of bird and insect host species it infects. To address this risk, emphasis should be placed on preventing exposure to infected mosquitoes, conducting high-quality surveillance of WNv and WNv disease, controlling mosquito vectors, and promoting public and professional education.

Introduction

West Nile virus a globally distributed member of the genus Flavivirus, infects a wide range of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians, as well as a variety of mosquito species, including members of the genus Culex. The virus is primarily maintained in bird populations through transmission by mosquitoes, and zoonotic transmission occurs when a mosquito that has fed on an infected bird subsequently bites a human host. WNv infection can also be transmitted from person to person through medical procedures, particularly blood transfusion and organ transplantation Footnote 1 Footnote 2. Since 1999, when human WNv disease was first recognized in humans in North America, the virus has spread continent-wide in both Canada and the USA, with annual outbreaks of varying intensity and regional distribution.

The goal of this commentary is to suggest that, although the impact of WNv has waxed and waned over the past decade or more, the virus will continue to have significant individual and public health consequences for the foreseeable future, and concerted action is required to minimize these consequences. We will review the epidemiology of WNv and WNv disease, provide a brief overview of the WNv epidemic in North America and then close by highlighting the need for ongoing vigilance regarding this public health challenge.

Epidemiology

Although it remains unknown what proportion of individuals who are bitten by a mosquito carrying WNv become infected, serological surveys and studies of viremic blood donors suggest that 70%-80% of infections are asymptomatic and/or unrecognized Footnote 3 Footnote 4. Symptomatic disease, which usually emerges 2-15 days after infection, ranges in severity from transient febrile illness with headache, chills, skin rash, nausea and muscle aches in the majority of cases to severe and sometimes fatal neurological disease in the form of meningitis, encephalitis or poliomyelitis/acute flaccid paralysis in approximately 1% of those infected Footnote 5. Most affected individuals recover fully from acute illness with presumably lifelong immunity to re-infection, but recovery can be prolonged, with sequelae of weakness, fatigue, neurologic and cognitive deficits, and psychiatric problems, some of which may be permanent. Individuals with underlying medical conditions and those over 70 years of age appear to be particularly susceptible to such effects Footnote 2 Footnote 6. There are currently no approved WNv vaccines or specific treatments for WNv disease in humans.

West Nile virus in North America

Historically, the first recorded case of WNv disease occurred in Uganda in 1937. Since then, local or regional WNv epidemics of relatively mild disease were reported intermittently from Africa and Israel until the 1990s, when outbreaks of severe disease emerged in western Russia as well as southern and eastern Europe Footnote 2. Such scattered epidemics continue to occur in Europe, possibly through repeated introductions by migratory birds Footnote 7. The first autochthonous North American cases of WNv disease were recorded in New York City in August 1999 Footnote 8. Strikingly, by 2001 WNv had spread to eastern Canada, the southeastern USA, Mexico and the Caribbean; by 2003 to the west coast of the USA; by 2005 to South America; and by 2008 to the west coast of Canada Footnote 9. The virus is now considered firmly established in the Americas.

WNv was first detected in Canada in 2001 in birds and mosquitoes collected from Ontario Footnote 10. Beginning with the first documented cases the following year, human WNv disease has now been reported from 10 Canadian provinces and territories (including travel-related cases in NB, NS, PE and YK). In total, 5,454 cases of WNv disease and asymptomatic infection were reported to the Public Health Agency of Canada between 2002 and 2013, including 1,072 cases of WNv neurological disease. Using the above rates it can therefore be estimated that in the range of 18,000-27,000 human WNv infections have occurred in Canada since 2002, possibly with a proportional rate of neurological disease higher than that reported from the USA. Several serosurveys have been conducted in Canada to estimate rates of human exposure to WNv, with resulting estimates typically of 3%-5%. However, in rural Saskatchewan following the 2003 WNv season, the seroprevalence was nearly 17% Footnote 11.

It should be noted that the reported annual national incidence of WNv disease has varied dramatically, from a total of 5 cases in 2010 and peaks of 1,495 and 2,401 cases in 2003 and 2007 respectively (Figure 1).

Regional variation has also been significant: for example, the majority of Canadian cases were reported from the Prairie provinces (AB, SK, MB) in 2003 and 2007, and from the Central provinces (ON, QC) in 2002 and 2012 Footnote 12. The long-term economic costs of acute care and persistent health effects in individuals affected by WNv disease can thus be assumed to be significant, although data that would support realistic estimates of these costs for Canada are lacking. A recent estimate of total cost to the US economy from 1999 through 2012 fell in the range of US $700M-1B Footnote 13.

Figure 1. Annual number of cases of human West Nile virus disease and asymptomatic infection reported to the Public Health Agency of Canada: 2002-2013


Figure 1
Text Equivalent - Figure 1

Figure: Annual number of cases of human West Nile Virus disease and asymptomatic infection reported to the Public Health Agency of Canada: 2002-2013

This figure is a histogram showing the number of reported cases of West Nile Virus over time. The y axis represents the number of reported cases and ranges from 0-2000. The x axis represents time and spans the years 2002 to 2013. In 2002 there were approximately 400 cases. This increased to almost 1500 cases in 2003. The remaining years had less than 200 cases with the exception of 2007 when there were over 2000 cases and 2012 when there were approximately 400 cases.

West Nile virus variation and change

During its evolutionary history WNv has undergone considerable genetic diversification, resulting in the presence of four major lineages, of which two (Lineages 1 and 2) are known to cause disease in humans. Lineage 2, which has not yet been identified in North America, has recently caused human WNv disease in Europe Footnote 7. Within Lineage 1, the most widespread lineage globally, a number of sub-lineages have been identified, and certain genetic changes have been associated with North American colonization and the biological behavior of the virus, particularly in birds and mosquitoes Footnote 14. For example, the NY99 WNv sub-lineage that initially colonized the Eastern USA shares a specific genetic change with a 1998 Israeli bird-derived strain that appears to confer on the virus an ability to replicate to higher levels in birds Footnote 15. The NY99 sub-lineage was also itself rapidly displaced by a derivative sub-lineage (WN02), which appears capable of faster invasion of the salivary glands of Culex mosquitoes after feeding, especially at higher temperatures, in turn suggesting a capacity to spread more rapidly during warmer weather Footnote 16.

Thus, by enhancing the reproductive potential and virulence of WNv in mosquitoes and birds respectively, genetic change appears to have facilitated the establishment and spread of WNv in North America, as well as its capacity to cause disease outbreaks. These effects are expected in turn to be amplified by human-driven environmental modification and change. For example, one recent California-based study found associations between per capita income and related factors (e.g. density of poorly maintained swimming pools) and the prevalence of WNv infection in both mosquitoes and humans Footnote 17. Another research group found that bird species diversity, often affected by human activity, was negatively correlated with local WNv infection rates of Culex mosquitoes in a Chicago suburb Footnote 18.

On a broader scale, along with warming temperatures and changing patterns of precipitation, climate change models predict an expansion of geographic range for WNv in North America into regions with higher numbers of previously unexposed human and animal hosts Footnote 19. Some regions of Canada, such as the Prairie provinces, may be particularly subject to such effects Footnote 20. These changes in WNv distribution may also be accompanied by additional genetic changes in the virus and/or the range of bird and insect host species it infects. Combined with the known positive correlation between WNv prevalence and temperature, and the (somewhat unexpected) negative correlation with precipitation amounts, these considerations suggest that the public health risk of WNv disease may increase in North America in the coming decades Footnote 16 Footnote 19.

The need for prevention

As discussed above, complex interactions occur among WNv, its numerous insect, bird and mammal hosts, and the environment, and for these reasons it has not yet proven possible to anticipate the occurrence of WNv or WNV disease at a level of spatial detail that would permit highly targeted local public health intervention. It is therefore clear that to minimize the impacts of WNv disease on the health of Canadians emphasis should be placed on primary prevention of human exposure to mosquitoes that may be carrying the virus, with the support of high-quality surveillance of WNv and WNv disease, control of mosquito vectors, and public and professional education. In Canada, a number of these preventive approaches are in place. For example, WNv disease is nationally notifiable and reportable, by statute, in all provinces and territories in Canada, and integrated national surveillance has been carried out through federal/provincial/territorial (F/P/T) partnership since 2002 Footnote 10 Footnote 12. The national surveillance effort is based on weekly sharing of surveillance data on humans, horses, birds and mosquitoes with the Public Health Agency of Canada by diverse partners, including provincial/territorial ministries of health, Canadian Blood Services and Héma-Québec, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency and the Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre. This information is then assembled into weekly national reports Footnote 12 during the peak risk season, as determined by an F/P/T working group at the beginning of each summer. The weekly reports are supplemented with information regarding WNv activity in the USA and in Europe.

Municipalities often undertake targeted control of mosquito populations, based on information about mosquito activity, infection rates and the occurrence of human and/or animal WNv disease in the area. Other important, national, public health measures are routine testing of blood donations by Canadian Blood Services and Héma-Québec to prevent blood-borne WNv transmission and often to provide the earliest indication of WNv activity in a given season, and delivery of expert scientific, epidemiological and laboratory diagnostic support (federally, through the National Microbiology Laboratory and the Centre for Food-borne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases). There is also, of course, much that Canadians can do to protect themselves and their families from exposure to mosquitoes that could carry WNv. Such measures include minimizing standing water to reduce local mosquito abundance, using insect repellents containing the active ingredient N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET), reducing outdoor activity when mosquitoes are most active and wearing protective clothing Footnote 21.

Conclusions

West Nile virus and the health problems it causes are likely to remain significant concerns for Canada in the foreseeable future. Surveillance, medical diagnosis and screening, mosquito control and public education programs have all been instituted in Canada. However, the dynamic nature of the pathogen, the complexity of its ecological interactions and the unpredictability of its detailed behaviour in time and space all indicate that additional efforts are required to maintain and improve the efficacy of primary prevention. Surveillance, research, logistic support and intervention measures undertaken by federal, provincial and territorial governments will continue to play key roles in these efforts. However, the issue of WNvs of importance to all Canadians, and access to up-to-date, scientifically based knowledge will continue to have a major positive impact.

Report a problem or mistake on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, contact us.

Date modified: