Chapter History S3-F8-C1, Principal-business Corporations in the Resource Industries

Introduction

The purpose of a Chapter History page is to highlight any amendments to the information contained in a chapter of an income tax folio, including amendments to the information originally contained in an interpretation bulletin that has been cancelled and replaced with a folio chapter. It outlines amendments that have been made as a result of legislative changes and proposed legislative changes, precedential court decisions, as well as new or revised interpretations of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).

Except as otherwise noted, all statutory references herein are references to provisions of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C., 1985, c.1 (5th Supp.), as amended and all references to a Regulation are to the Income Tax Regulations, C.R.C., c. 945, as amended.

Update February 22, 2024

A proposed legislative change notice has been added before ¶1.3 to alert readers to changes proposed by Bill C‑59, Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023. Under these proposals, the definition of principal-business corporation in subsection 66(15) will be modified in two respects:  the production and marketing of lithium will be added to paragraph (f.1) and the manufacturing of products where the processing of lithium is involved will be added to paragraph (g). If the amendment is passed, the changes will be effective March 28, 2023.

¶1.9 has been revised to remove the final two sentences that discussed the differences between Classes 43.1 and 43.2. The deleted sentences formerly read: “Generally, where depreciable property described in Class 43.1 is acquired after February 22, 2005 and before 2020, it will be eligible for inclusion under Class 43.2. However, cogeneration systems that use fossil fuels must meet a higher efficiency standard in order to be eligible for inclusion in Class 43.2.” Since this is discussed in Income Tax Folio S3-F8-C2, Tax Incentives for Clean Energy Equipment, a reference to that Folio has been added for this information as well as to learn about other tax incentives available for clean energy equipment. 

¶1.22 has been revised to add a reference to subsection 66(3) so that the paragraph reflects that the subsection is also included in subsection 66(5).

¶1.24 has been revised to remove the reference to subsection 66(12.601) from the final sentence. The subsection is no longer relevant as the 2017 Budget eliminated this rule for expenses incurred after 2018 (except for expenses incurred after 2018 and before April 2019 that are renounced under a flow-through share  agreement entered into after 2016 and before March 22, 2017). In addition, the paragraph has been revised to reflect the additions of paragraphs 66(12.6)(b.2) and 66(12.62)(b.2), which eliminate the flow-through share regime for oil, gas, and coal activities. This is done by no longer allowing CEE and CDE related to these activities to be renounced under flow-through share agreements made after March 2023 and was added by Bill C‑32, Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2022, S.C. 2022, c.19.

¶1.26 has been revised to remove the reference to pre-production mining expenditures and  ¶1.27 to 1.29 have been removed because the investment tax credit related to pre‑production mining expenditures was phased-out by S.C. 2012, c.31 and is no longer available after 2015. The deleted paragraphs formerly read as follows:

"1.27 A taxable Canadian corporation may be entitled to claim a 10% investment tax credit for pre-production mining expenditures. Pre-production mining expenditure is defined in subsection 127(9) and includes grass roots exploration and pre-production development expenditures in Canada for qualifying minerals such as diamonds and base or precious metals. Generally, a corporation which claims the investment tax credit must incur the expense in order for the expense to qualify as a pre-production mining expenditure. An expense which has been renounced to the corporation under subsection 66(12.6) will generally not qualify. However, there is an exception that allows certain PBCs to claim the pre-production mining expenditures renounced to them by their wholly-owned subsidiaries. This exception applies to corporations that qualify under paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), (f.1) and (g) of the definition of PBC (mining activities).

1.28 A member’s share of expenses incurred by a partnership will not generally qualify as a pre-production mining expenditure. However, there is an exception in situations where a corporation is a member of a partnership each member of which is a PBC engaged in mining activities and the corporation is an actively engaged member of the partnership. In such a case, the expense deemed by subsection 66(18) to have been incurred by the corporation at the end of the fiscal period of the partnership will qualify as a pre-production mining expenditure.

1.29 The investment tax credit related to pre-production mining expenditures will be completely phased-out by the end of the 2015 tax year. T2 Corporation – Income Tax Guide 2014 contains further explanation of the rates of the investment tax credit that are applicable during the phase-out period."

¶1.30 discusses the definition of flow-through mining expenditure, which was added to subsection 127(9), by S.C. 2001, c. 17, s. 118(7), applicable, initially, from October 18, 2000, to 2003. Various amendments to the definition have extended the period to which it applies. The dates in the final sentence of ¶1.30 have been revised to reflect the most recent extension of the period to which the definition of flow-through mining expenditure applies.

¶1.31 and 1.32 have been added to discuss the definition of flow-through critical mineral mining expenditure, which was added to subsection 127(9), by Bill C‑32, Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2022, S.C. 2022, c.19, applicable for expenses incurred after April 7, 2022 and renounced under a FTS agreement entered into after April 7, 2022 and before April 1, 2027. The definition of critical mineral and qualified professional engineer or professional geoscientist were also added to subsection 127(9) by Bill C‑32 and are discussed in ¶1.31 and 1.32, respectively, as they are relevant for the purposes of the definition of flow-through critical mineral mining expenditure.

A Proposed legislative change notice has been added after ¶1.32 to alert readers to a proposed change to the definition of the term mineral resource in subsection 248(1). The change is proposed by Bill C‑59, Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023. The definition will be amended to include lithium as a listed mineral resource, allowing lithium brine deposits to qualify as a mineral resource. If the amendment is passed, the changes will be effective March 28, 2023.

¶1.33 has been added to clarify that taxpayers cannot claim more than one investment tax credit in respect of the same expense. It also clarifies that having filed to claim one of the investment tax credits, taxpayers cannot subsequently select a different one. This amendment was enacted by Bill C‑32, Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2022, S.C. 2022, c.19 with effect from April 7, 2022.

The Reference section has been updated to remove the reference to subsection 66(12.601) as it is no longer relevant and to add a reference to section 6202.1 of the Regulations.

Update February 1, 2017

¶1.30 discusses the definition of flow-through mining expenditure, which was added to subsection 127(9), by S.C. 2001, c. 17, s. 118(7), applicable, initially, from October 18, 2000, to 2003. Various amendments to the definition have extended the period to which it applies. ¶1.30 has been revised to reflect the most recent extension of the period to which the definition of flow-through mining expenditure applies.

Update February 5, 2016

¶1.30 discusses the definition of flow-through mining expenditure, which was added to subsection 127(9), by S.C. 2001, c. 17, s. 118(7), applicable, initially, from October 18, 2000, to 2003. Various amendments to the definition have extended the period to which it applies. ¶1.30 has been revised to reflect the most recent extension of the period to which the definition of flow-through mining expenditure applies.

Update November 26, 2015

Minor changes have been made to improve the usability of the income tax folios:

Update August 13, 2015

¶1.9 has been revised to specify that the clean energy generation and energy conservation equipment must be situated in Canada.

¶1.10 has been revised to include a link to technical information available on the Natural Resources Canada website.

Update April 3, 2015

General

Income Tax Folio S3-F8-C1, Principal-business Corporations in the Resource Industries, replaces and cancels Interpretation Bulletin IT-400, Exploration and Development Expenses - Meaning of Principal-Business Corporation and its special release, IT-400SR, Exploration and Development Expenses - Meaning of Principal-Business Corporation.

In addition to consolidating the content of the former interpretation bulletins, general revisions have been made to improve readability. Any substantive technical and interpretive changes to the information outlined in the former interpretation bulletins are described below.

Legislative and other changes

¶1.1 has been added to list the abbreviations and the definitions used in the Chapter.

¶1.2 (formerly ¶4 of IT-400) has been modified to reflect updates and changes to the PBC definition resulting from various legislative amendments. The most recent amendment was made by S.C. 2010, c. 25, s. 12(1) applicable to 2004 and subsequent tax years. Also, as a result of the restructuring of provisions by R.S.C. 1985 (5th Supp.), the PBC definition now appears in subsection 66(15) instead of in paragraph 66(15)(h), applicable to tax years ending after November 1991.

¶1.3 to 1.10 (formerly ¶7 to 11 of IT-400) have been expanded to list all qualifying business operations included in the PBC definition. ¶1.8 to 1.10 discuss new paragraphs (h) and (i) that were added to the PBC definition in subsection 66(15) by S.C. 1997, c. 25, s. 13(28), applicable after December 5, 1996, and which were subsequently amended, most recently by S.C. 2010, c. 25, s. 12(1), applicable to 2004 and subsequent tax years. The information on CRCE is new. Subsection 66.1(6) was amended by S.C. 1997, c. 25, s. 14(5), applicable after December 5, 1996, to add the definition of CRCE, as well as to add paragraph (g.1) to the CEE definition to make the CRCE part of the CEE.

¶1.19 has been added to clarify that based on the wording of the legislation, a non-resident corporation could qualify as a PBC provided it meets the PBC criteria.

¶1.20 (formerly ¶2 of IT-400) has been revised to remove the information previously contained in paragraphs 2(c) and 2(d) of IT-400. Paragraph 2(c) has been deleted because subsections 66(10), (10.1), (10.2) and (10.3), the provisions related to joint exploration corporations, were repealed by S.C. 1997, c. 25, s. 13(1), applicable to renunciations made after March 5, 1996, or 2006 if covered under the grandfathering provisions. Content formerly in paragraph 2(d) of IT-400 has also been deleted because S.C. 1985, c. 45 repealed old subsection 59(1.1) effective for property disposed of in tax years commencing after 1984.

¶1.21 (formerly ¶2(a) of IT-400) has been revised to clarify and specify that the subsection 66.1(2) restriction on the deduction of CEE only applies to certain PBCs in accordance with an amendment made by S.C. 1997, c. 25, s. 14(1). At the same time, subsection 66.1(3) was amended by S.C. 1997, c. 25, s. 14(2), to extend its application to the other PBCs. Both amendments are applicable to tax years that end after December 5, 1996. The reference to subsection 66(1), Canadian exploration and development expenses, has been removed as it is restricted to resource expenses incurred before May 7, 1974. As a result, related information formerly included in ¶3 of IT-400 has also been deleted.

¶1.22 (formerly ¶2(e) of IT-400) has been revised to reflect amendments to subsection 66(5) made by S.C. 2001, c. 17, s. 44(5), applicable to tax years that begin after 2000. These amendments added references to sections 66.21 (foreign resource expenses) and 66.7(successor rules). Also, the reference to subsection 66(3) has been removed from the Chapter because that subsection is applicable to taxpayers other than PBCs. In addition, the reference to section 64 has been deleted from the discussion because the original section 64 relating to dispositions of resource property was repealed by S.C. 1980-81-82-83, c. 140.

¶1.23 has been added to discuss the rule in subsection 66(11.4). This special rule was announced on January 15, 1987 [S.C. 1987, c. 46] and has been amended subsequently.  Currently it applies to corporations and trusts, but does not apply to PBCs.

¶1.24 (formerly ¶2(b) of IT-400) and 1.25 have been revised in respect of flow-through shares (FTS) in order to refer to the legislation as reflected in the current version of the Act. The FTS definition is now in subsection 66(15). This definition has been amended various times, most recently by S.C. 2013, c. 34, s. 199(6), applicable to agreements made after December 20, 2002. Further to an amendment made by S.C. 1997, c. 25, s. 13(26), applicable to renunciations made after 1998, references in the FTS definition to renunciations of Canadian oil and gas property expenses were eliminated. The reference to subsection 66(12.64) that permitted a PBC to renounce Canadian oil and gas property expenses to flow-through shareholders has also been removed as this subsection was repealed by S.C. 1997, c. 25, s. 13(15), applicable to renunciations made after March 5, 1996, with grandfathering provisions for certain renunciations made before 1999. The revised content also includes references to subsection 66(12.601) that was introduced by S.C. 1994, c. 8, s. 5(5) and applies with respect to expenses incurred after December 2, 1992 and subsection 66(12.66), the look-back rule that was initially introduced by S.C. 1986, c. 55 and was most recently amended by S.C. 2013, c.40, s. 30(2).

¶1.26 to 1.30 are new and discuss information on investment tax credits (ITC) in respect of pre-production mining expenditures and flow-through mining expenditures in subsections 127(5) and (9).

¶1.27 to 1.29 discuss the ITC for pre-production mining expenditure that was added to subsection 127(9) by S.C. 2003, c. 28, s. 14(7), applicable to 2003 and subsequent tax years. In October 2012, S.C. 2012, c. 31, s. 27(7), phased out the 10% ITC for eligible pre-production mining expenditures with different rates of transitional relief up to 2015. The amendment applies with respect to expenditures incurred after March 28, 2012. Paragraph (b) of the definition of pre-production mining expenditure, was amended by S.C. 2013, c. 34, s. 269(9), applicable to the 2003 and subsequent tax years, to allow a PBC to claim the pre-production mining expenditure renounced by its wholly owned subsidiary.

¶1.30 discusses the definition of flow-through mining expenditure, which was added to subsection 127(9), by S.C. 2001, c. 17, s. 118(7), applicable, initially, from October 18, 2000, to 2003. Various amendments to the definition have extended the period to which it applies.

Page details

Date modified: