Report 4—Professional Services Contracts with GCStrategies Inc.

Federal organizations frequently failed to follow procurement rules when awarding contracts to GCStrategies Inc.

Banner Image

Report metadata

Tabling date:
Audited entities:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Canada Border Services Agency
Canada Revenue Agency
Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission
Employment and Social Development Canada
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Global Affairs Canada
Health Canada
Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada
Indigenous Services Canada
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Department of Justice Canada
Library and Archives Canada
National Defence
Natural Resources Canada
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada
Parks Canada
Public Safety Canada
Public Services and Procurement Canada
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Statistics Canada
Transport Canada
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Topics:
Financial management and government spending
Government purchasing
Public Administration
Report type
Auditor General reports

At a glance

From April 2015 through March 2024, federal organizations awarded 106 professional services contracts to GCStrategies Inc., an Ottawa‑based staffing company in the information technology sector. The contracts were for services that included technology support and had a maximum total value of $92.7 million, of which about $64.5 million was ultimately paid out.

In 21% of contracts examined, we found that federal organizations lacked documentation on file that showed valid security clearances for contract resources. Having contract resources working on government networks without the required security clearance compromises the government’s ability to protect sensitive information, assets, and work sites.

Federal organizations are required to monitor the work performed by contractors. However, we noted that federal organizations frequently disregarded government policies in this area. This included not having records showing which contracted resources performed the work, what work was completed, and whether the people doing the work had the required experience and qualifications. In addition, in 82% of examined non‑competitive contracts and competitive contracts that received only 1 valid bid, federal organizations failed to verify that the fees paid did not exceed market rates.

Although this audit focused on contracts awarded to a particular contractor, it highlights gaps in basic requirements that all federal organizations should follow when procuring services. This report has no recommendations but confirms weaknesses raised in previous audits. Rather than repeat previous recommendations on procurement, this audit re‑confirms that policy should be well understood and properly applied. We found in our 2024 audit of professional services contracts that federal procurement policies promote fairness, transparency, and value for Canadians—when they are followed.

Why we did this audit

  • The federal public sector spends billions of dollars of public funds on contracting each year.
  • Canadians expect that federal organizations have controls, processes, and policies in place to support fair, open, and transparent procurements and to promote value for money.
  • Federal organizations need to ensure that public funds are spent with due regard for value for money, including in decisions about the procurement of professional services contracts.

Highlights of our recommendations

We did not issue recommendations in this audit report. We encourage federal organizations to implement the recommendations from recent procurement audits.

Key facts and findings

  • From 13 April 2015 to 31 March 2024, 31 federal organizations had contracts with GCStrategies Inc.: 29 federal departments and agencies, 1 Crown corporation, and 1 agent of Parliament.
  • Government spending on contracts with GCStrategies Inc. grew between the 2015–16 and 2021–22 fiscal years, at a time when government spending for outside professional services was on the rise.
  • GCStrategies Inc. represented 0.37% of the total amount paid for informatics services across all federal organizations from 2015–16 to 2023–24.
  • In 33% of contracts we examined, federal organizations could not show that contract resources had the experience and qualifications needed to complete the required work.
  • In all the contracts examined, federal organizations provided justification for the contracts with GCStrategies Inc. Reasons cited included the need to procure specialized services or to temporarily supplement capacity.
  • In 58% of the non‑competitive contracts examined, federal organizations failed to assess whether there would be benefits to calling for bids.

Exhibit highlights

Parliamentary hearings

Page details

2026-02-25