Survey Following a Special Examination—Chief Executive Officer or President of the Crown corporation
Name of organization:
Report date:
Head of organization
1. Value of the Examination
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 1.a During discussions and through reports, the auditors identified valuable opportunities to strengthen systems and practices. | ||||||
| 1.b The recommendations focused on the most significant issues identified in the examination. |
2. Management of the Examination
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 2.a The examination covered key corporate management practices, operational activities and areas of significant risk within our organization. | ||||||
| 2.b The auditors completed their work according to the agreed timelines. | ||||||
| 2.c The auditors’ requests for information were relevant to the examination and represented reasonable expectations. | ||||||
| 2.d The auditors provided staff with a reasonable amount of time to comply with requests for documentation. | ||||||
| 2.e The auditors provided staff with a reasonable amount of time to comment on examination findings and respond to recommendations. |
3. Communications
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 3.a The auditors actively engaged the organization in the examination process and maintained appropriate communications during the examination. | ||||||
| 3.b The auditors proactively identified, communicated, and resolved issues and significant differences of views in a timely manner. | ||||||
| 3.c The auditors reported examination findings objectively and fairly. | ||||||
| 3.d The auditors prepared clear and concise reports. |
4. Professional Relations and Competencies
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 4.a The auditors collectively demonstrated sufficient understanding of the organization and its environment relevant to the examination. | ||||||
| 4.b The auditors collectively demonstrated sufficient technical competencies relevant to the examination. | ||||||
| 4.c The auditors conducted themselves professionally, including demonstrated independence, objectivity, non-partisanship, and professional skepticism (that is, maintained a respectful but questioning approach), throughout the examination. |
5. Overall
| Strongly disagree 1 |
Partially disagree 2 |
Neither agree, nor disagree 3 |
Partially agree 4 |
Strongly agree 5 |
No opinion/ Don’t know/ Not ApplicableN/A |
|
| 5.a Overall, we were satisfied with how the examination was conducted. |
6. Additional Comments
6.a Please provide any other comments you may have on your experience with the examination.
|
6.b Please provide suggestions on how we could bring more value to your organization.
|