# 2022-195 Pay and Benefits, Allowances and Benefits

Case summary

F&R Date: 2023-07-25

The grievor complained that he should have been reimbursed for meals beyond the prescribed 30-day limit while waiting for his household goods and effects to be delivered to his new residence. The grievor argued that the delay was caused by a contracted moving company hired by the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), and constituted exceptional circumstances beyond his control, as defined by the CAF Relocation Directive (CAFRD). The grievor contended that the CAFRD provides the CAF discretion to seek Treasury Board (TB) approval of the additional meal entitlements in such circumstances. As redress, the grievor sought reimbursement for meals for three additional days beyond the 30-day limit. 

There was no Initial Authority decision for this grievance as the Director General Compensation and Benefits was unable to render a decision within the four-month deadline required under article 7.15 of the Queen's Regulations and Orders for the Canadian Forces. The grievor elected to have his grievance file referred directly to the Final Authority for adjudication.

The Committee noted that the CAFRD represents TB approved direction for relocation benefits, and already contemplates delays such as the grievor experienced during relocation. The Committee did not find the grievor's circumstances to be exceptional above and beyond those already contemplated by the CAFRD. The Committee noted the expectation that CAF members will seek out accommodations with cooking facilities when facing an extended delay beyond 30 days. The Committee found this expectation to be reasonable. 

The Committee recommended that redress not be granted.