Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Letter on Implementation of the Call to Action on Anti-Racism, Equity and Inclusion

Summer 2021 update

Dear Janice Charette:

I am writing to update you on the activities Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) has been undertaking towards an equitable, inclusive and discrimination-free workplace.

I take great pride in the work we do at AAFC and how we work together to deliver on our mandate. I know most AAFC employees are also proud of the work they do; however, it is clear that many members of our team have experienced both specific and systemic discrimination. The effects of this discrimination are very real. They can limit employees’ contributions to the department, affect their career and cause significant personal pain. Discrimination is inconsistent with our core values as public servants, and these effects should not be acceptable to any of us. A fully inclusive workplace will be a productive one, where everyone can contribute to their full potential and where diverse perspectives are brought to decision-making.

I thank the members of AAFC’s five Diversity and Inclusion Networks and others who shared their lived experiences with me as well as members of our senior management team over the past year. They have shared extremely difficult experiences and have provided us with many concrete examples of how we can take down systemic and specific barriers that many of our employees face. These conversations have underscored how important it is for all of us to act with empathy, to question our privileges and biases and to proactively strive for a respectful workplace where everyone can bring their full selves to work.

Like in many other departments, we have made important efforts to improve our workplace in recent years. What is different now is we are moving from an incremental approach to a more fundamental effort to tackle systemic racism and discrimination. We are reviewing and changing our hiring, promotion and other human resource practices to ensure they are fair and free of bias; we are creating safe spaces for employees and managers to learn and better understand the experiences of their colleagues; and we are making extra efforts to ensure our programs are accessible to groups that have traditionally had less access.

This is a fundamental priority for me as Deputy Minister, but not something I can accomplish alone. To be successful, everyone at AAFC must be active in tackling our challenges. The good news is there is tremendous commitment and energy amongst our employees. These range from members of the leadership team who champion and support specific initiatives to the managers and human resource professionals who help shape our workplace culture and to the many individual employees from across the organization who have shared their thoughts, experiences and ideas with us, acted as allies to their colleagues and led initiatives contributing to a more diverse and inclusive workplace at AAFC.

Our challenges

Based on survey data and my own experiences with colleagues, I feel that we offer a rewarding work environment at AAFC. At the same time, it is quite clear that this is not the lived experience of many of our employees, who report instances of discrimination and harassment and who have experienced significant obstacles in their careers. While our recent Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) results trended in the right direction in areas such as harassment, discrimination, diversity, inclusion and anti-racism, they also reveal that AAFC continues to face challenges in creating a fully inclusive workplace at all levels of the organization (see Annex A — PSES harassment and discrimination 3-year trend).

The overall reported rate of discrimination at AAFC, at 6%, is still too high, and for some equity-seeking groups, the results are much higher. For example, 15% of Black employees and 16% of Persons with Disabilities who self-identified on the survey report having experienced discrimination in the last year (see Annex B — PSES results).

Persons with Disabilities were more likely than the departmental average to identify that accessibility and accommodation issues have impacted their career progression, suggesting that there is more to do to streamline and simplify our processes (see Annex B — PSES results).

Employment data analysis shows that AAFC exceeds labour market availability in our employment of Racialized Persons and Women, but that Indigenous Peoples and, in particular, Persons with Disabilities remain underrepresented. In addition, gaps continue to exist across all branches, occupational categories and levels for all employment equity groups (see Annex C — Employment equity dashboard).

Looking beyond the data, when the senior management team and I met with the Diversity and Inclusion Networks, and other employee-led networks, to discuss issues of racism, discrimination and barriers to equity and inclusion, we heard that our recruitment, career progression and retention practices can sometimes serve as barriers to increasing representation and creating a more diverse and inclusive workplace. For example, the use of gender-biased language, unnecessarily stringent formal experience and education criteria and language requirements on staffing posters limit who can apply, reducing the diversity of the pool of candidates from the beginning. This echoed some of the challenges identified in our PSES results.

Turning to action

Much of our focus this past year has been on listening to and learning from our employees. We had sometimes difficult and emotional conversations, and I thank all who participated for having the courage to share their experiences and honest impressions of our workplace and the barriers that exist. Of the many takeaways, this allowed us to understand the importance of creating safe environments for employees to discuss difficult and sensitive topics. In response to the racially motivated attack in London, Ontario, and the discoveries of unmarked gravesites on former residential school lands, our diversity and inclusion champions hosted a safe space discussion attended by over 300 employees. The Indigenous Network Circle also hosted drop-in sessions to support members in a safe, judgment-free environment and created a virtual sharing space for allies to access learning resources in support of Truth and Reconciliation. I want to recognize these efforts, which are helping to shift our workplace culture to being one where we are able to openly and safely share experiences and learn from one another about racism, reconciliation, equity and inclusion.

However, we must do more. As a senior management team at AAFC, we are committed to increasing representation, creating a more inclusive workplace and enhancing our leadership, accountability and monitoring. Over the past year, we have begun developing and implementing initiatives that directly target the challenges we have identified. We have grouped our actions into three priority areas (see Annex D — List of actions completed, planned or underway).

1. Increasing representation

This year, AAFC launched targeted recruitment to seek Indigenous, Black and other racialized candidates, as well as Persons with Disabilities, for job categories where there is underrepresentation—namely, students, administrative professionals, research technicians and executives. I would highlight, notably, our Indigenous Student Recruitment Initiative, which continues to offer Indigenous students opportunities to expand their knowledge and develop skills associated with science and other professions at AAFC. Last year we hired 44 students through this initiative.

In addition, AAFC is working to increase diversity in the senior ranks of the organization. In a recent director-level staffing process, AAFC welcomed applicants from across the public service who self-identified as a visible minority, an Indigenous person or as a person with a disability. Of the almost 100 applicants screened in for further assessment, over half self-identified in one of these employment equity groups. The process resulted in 18 qualified candidates, 11 of whom self-identified. This fall, AAFC will launch a new sponsorship program to help prepare high-potential employees, specifically from equity-seeking groups, for leadership roles by providing them with unique development opportunities.

2. A more inclusive workplace

As mentioned, AAFC has five well-established Diversity and Inclusion Networks: the Gender and Sexual Diversity Inclusiveness Network; the Visible Minorities Network; the Indigenous Network Circle; the Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Network; and the Persons with Disabilities Network.

These networks are employee-led, but are also championed by members of the senior leadership team. The Networks serve as safe places for discussion, help to create a sense of community, support the mental health of members and allow for grassroots engagement. They organize, support and participate in many learning and commemorative events that raise awareness and drive to a deeper understanding of issues. This past year, we had the opportunity to participate in virtual events for Day of Pink and Pride Season and Week, Black History Month, National Indigenous History Month, Asian History Month, International Day of Persons with Disabilities and National Accessibility Week, among others.

In addition to the fundamental work of these networks, and many branch-led initiatives, AAFC launched several department-wide learning and awareness initiatives this past year. We launched the Be an Ally Campaign to encourage employees to become allies to equity-seeking groups and address racism and other forms of discrimination. We organized positive space training for senior executives to help ensure AAFC is open and welcoming to persons of all sexual and gender diversities. Training was also offered to all executives on unconscious bias and inclusive leadership, with over 100 executives participating in each session. We look forward to being able to expand these types of training to all employees of the organization in the years ahead.

AAFC is also piloting the Government of Canada Workplace Accessibility Passport, which is designed to facilitate conversations between employees and their managers about the tools and support they need to address barriers and succeed in their jobs. We feel this is an important initiative to support mobility and career development, particularly for Persons with Disabilities.

3. Leadership, accountability and monitoring

As we develop our diversity and inclusion plan for 2022–2025, we will continue to engage with employees to find ways to reduce barriers and improve our leadership, accountability and monitoring. We are also undertaking an employment systems review to ensure our human resources policies and services are free of bias.

To help assess progress on diversity and inclusion, we are developing a diversity and inclusion index, based on our PSES results and our workforce data. The index will be launched this fall and will complement the review, and our engagement with our employees, to inform departmental direction on decisions on diversity and inclusion initiatives and practices (see Annex E — Diversity and Inclusion Index). A diversity and inclusion toolkit for managers will also be released soon, to provide tools, resources and guidance for creating a culture of inclusion.

We also recognize that racial and other biases that affect our workplace also affect the policies and programs that we develop and the services we deliver to the agriculture and agri-food sector. We have therefore started to look at our policies, programs and service models to ensure they are accessible and inclusive. To make better decisions, we need diverse perspectives at the table so we are increasingly inviting Diversity and Inclusion Network members and others representing a broad range of voices to participate in our departmental policy and corporate governance committees.

We are modernizing our sector engagement to gain a broader, more diverse perspective on issues and opportunities affecting Canadian agriculture and agri-food to drive at solutions that collectively advance our commitment to sustainable growth and competitiveness. We have adapted programming to recognize changes to cost-shares for more vulnerable groups. We established programs such as the Indigenous Pathfinder Service to ensure Indigenous Peoples have an equal opportunity to access the federal programs and services available to them in the agriculture and agri-food sector. Furthermore, this year, we launched the Canadian Food Policy Advisory Council and the Canadian Agricultural Youth Council as well as made progress on our department’s Gender-Based Analysis Plus strategy.

While I am encouraged by the progress that we have made this past year, there is more we can do to foster a fully diverse, inclusive, equitable and accessible workplace.

I look forward to continuing to lead our efforts with the support of all AAFC employees and our colleagues across the Government of Canada and to sharing our results. We will continue to look for new ways to support each other and ensure our workplaces are ones where everyone has the opportunity to contribute their fullest potential.

Sincerely,

Chris Forbes

Annexes — Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s response to the call to action on anti-racism, equity and inclusion

Ian Shugart, Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet, released the Call to Action on Anti-Racism, Equity and Inclusion in the Federal Public Service on January 22, 2021. It calls on leaders across the Public Service to take practical actions that will be the basis for systemic change.

These annexes summarize practical actions taken and planned Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Annex A — Public Service Employee Survey responses on harassment and discrimination, three-year trend

Harassment

 

2018

2019

2020

 

(%)

AAFC

14

13

11

Persons with a Disability

30

31

21

Indigenous People

14

13

14

Women

14

13

11

Visible Minorities

15

13

12

Discrimination

 

2018

2019

2020

 

(%)

AAFC

7

7

6

Persons with a Disability

23

24

16

Indigenous People

6

9

11

Women

11

9

11

Visible Minorities

7

6

6

Annex B – Public Service Employee Survey results

Perceptions of opportunities are also less positive

Question.42: I have opportunities for promotion within AAFC given my education, skills and experience
 

(%)

Southeast Asian

80

Filipino

67

Another sexual orientation

60

Indigenous

60

Gay or lesbian

58

Black

57

Person of mixed origin

54

South Asian/East Indian

54

Métis

53

Visible minority

53

Bisexual

52

Cognitive disability

50

AAFC

49

Female gender

49

Chinese

46

Gender diverse

43

Mental health issue

42

Mobility issue

41

Other VM group

39

Person with a disability

38

Dexterity issue

35

Hearing disability

35

Other disability

35

Chronic health condition or pain

32

Environmental disability

32

Seeing disability

14

Accessibility and accommodation are perceived as an issue

Question 43d: My career progression has been impacted by accessibility or accommodation issues
 

(%)

Gender diverse

0

Southeast Asian

0

Female gender

3

AAFC

4

Chinese

4

Filipino

4

Another sexual orientation

5

Black

5

Gay or lesbian

5

Visible minority

5

Bisexual

6

Indigenous

6

South Asian/East Indian

6

Hearing disability

8

Métis

8

Person of mixed origin

9

Other VM group

11

Seeing disability

12

Person with a disability

14

Chronic health condition or pain

16

Mental health issue

18

Cognitive disability

20

Environmental disability

22

Mobility issue

23

Other disability

26

Dexterity issue

31

Results for discrimination show a similar pattern to harassment

Question 62: Have you been the victim of discrimination on the job in the past 12 months?
 

(%)

Southeast Asian

0

AAFC

6

Chinese

6

Female gender

6

Métis

10

Indigenous

11

Visible minority

11

Bisexual

12

Person of mixed origin

14

Black

15

Person with a disability

16

South Asian/East Indian

16

Cognitive disability

18

Environmental Disability

18

Other disability

18

Chronic health condition or pain

20

Mental health issue

21

Mobility issue

23

Dexterity issue

27

Annex C — AAFC employment equity dashboard

Department employment equity representation as of March 31, 2021

Occupational group

EX

EG

AS

GL

EC

SERES

CO

CS

CR

FI

PM

BI

PE

PC

Number of employees

117

871

602

462

485

434

338

323

245

200

186

160

121

96

Indigenous People

Representation

3

19

33

15

10

3

12

10

17

7

13

2

8

2

Representation (%)

2.6

2.2

5.5

3.2

2.1

0.7

3.6

3.1

6.9

3.5

7

1.3

6.6

2.1

Workforce availability estimates

5

48

26

19

7

8

8

10

17

5

17

3

5

1

Workforce availability estimates (%)

4.5

5.5

4.4

4.2

1.5

1.9

2.5

3

7

2.5

9

1.9

4.1

1.3

Gap

-2

-29

7

-4

3

-5

4

0

0

2

-4

-1

3

1

Persons with Disabilities

Representation

4

34

43

11

25

6

11

20

26

8

15

3

12

4

Representation (%)

3.4

3.9

7.1

2.4

5.2

1.4

3.3

6.2

10.6

4

8.1

1.9

9.9

4.2

Workforce availability estimates

6

57

60

43

37

33

33

32

23

20

18

12

12

7

Workforce availability estimates (%)

5.3

6.6

9.9

9.4

7.7

7.7

9.9

9.9

9.5

9.9

9.9

7.7

9.9

7.7

Gap

-2

-23

-17

-32

-12

-27

-22

-12

3

-12

-3

-9

0

-3

Visible Minorities

Representation

12

132

81

12

110

133

61

74

32

75

21

52

23

13

Representation (%)

10.3

15.2

13.5

2.6

22.7

30.6

18

22.9

13.1

37.5

11.3

32.5

19

13.5

Workforce availability estimates

14

79

60

22

134

81

52

60

23

40

28

30

11

26

Workforce availability estimates (%)

11.9

9.1

9.9

4.7

27.7

18.7

15.3

18.5

9.2

20.1

15.1

18.6

9.2

26.7

Gap

-2

53

21

-10

-24

52

9

14

9

35

-7

22

12

-13

Women

Representation

62

473

475

115

253

149

194

75

199

97

111

64

97

34

Representation (%)

53

54.3

78.9

24.9

52.2

34.3

57.4

23.2

81.2

48.5

59.7

40

80.2

35.4

Workforce availability estimates

54

415

447

136

203

229

172

78

199

101

110

84

87

27

Workforce availability estimates (%)

0.5

0.5

0.7

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.2

0.8

0.5

0.6

0.5

0.7

0.3

Gap

8

58

28

-21

50

-80

22

-3

0

-4

1

-20

10

7

Members of employment equity groups

Percentage of population

45.8

47.7

74.2

29.4

41.8

52.7

51

24.2

81.4

50.3

59

52.7

71.9

27.9

Notes

Workforce availability estimates are based on the 2016 Census or, in the case of Persons with Disabilities, the 2017 Canadian Survey on Disability. Gaps represent the difference between the current number of employees who have self-identified and the number of employees expected based on the workforce availability estimate.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada data is as of March 31, 2021, indeterminate and terms of more than three months. Data for occupational groups of 10 employees or fewer have been suppressed for privacy reasons.

Employment equity new hires for key occupational groups

 

All new hires (percentage of population)

Indigenous People

Persons with Disabilities

Visible Minorities

Women

EX

12.0

0.0

0.9

0.0

7.7

EG

5.7

0.0

0.2

1.1

3.2

AS

14.8

0.7

0.7

1.3

11.8

GL

14.3

0.9

0.2

0.2

4.8

EC

11.5

0.0

0.2

3.7

7.2

SERES

5.8

0.0

0.0

2.1

2.1

CO

8.0

0.6

0.0

2.1

6.2

CS

9.9

0.0

0.0

3.7

2.5

CR

17.1

1.2

0.4

3.3

15.1

FI

8.0

0.5

0.5

4.5

3.0

PM

8.1

1.1

0.0

1.6

3.8

BI

15.0

0.6

0.0

10.0

6.9

PE

18.2

0.8

2.5

4.1

14.9

PC

8.3

0.0

1.0

1.0

4.2

Employment equity promotion rates for key occupational groups

 

All promotions (percentage of population)

Indigenous People

Persons with Disabilities

Visible Minorities

Women

EX

14.5

0.9

0.0

0.9

10.3

EG

4.5

0.0

0.1

0.6

2.6

AS

9.3

0.0

0.8

1.8

8.0

GL

3.0

0.4

0.0

0.2

0.6

EC

19.2

0.0

0.2

3.5

10.3

SERES

6.2

0.0

0.0

1.6

2.1

CO

7.4

0.0

0.0

0.3

4.1

CS

1.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.6

CR

2.4

0.0

0.0

0.4

2.4

FI

8.0

0.0

0.5

4.5

5.0

PM

8.1

1.1

1.1

0.5

3.8

BI

7.5

0.6

0.0

1.3

3.1

PE

25.6

1.7

0.8

2.5

23.1

PC

2.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

2.1

Employment equity separation rates for key occupational groups

 

All promotions (percentage of population)

Indigenous People

Persons with Disabilities

Visible Minorities

Women

EX

14.5

0.9

0.0

2.6

6.0

EG

7.5

0.2

0.1

1.4

3.4

AS

15.1

0.5

0.3

2.2

13.1

GL

13.2

0.6

0.0

0.2

3.2

EC

8.7

0.0

0.4

1.6

5.8

SERES

8.8

0.0

0.5

3.5

2.8

CO

8.9

0.0

0.6

1.8

5.3

CS

9.0

0.3

0.3

1.9

2.8

CR

13.9

0.8

0.0

1.6

10.2

FI

5.5

0.0

1.0

1.5

1.5

PM

12.4

0.5

0.5

0.0

7.5

BI

11.3

0.0

0.0

5.0

3.8

PE

19.8

0.0

2.5

1.7

17.4

PC

6.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.2

Representation comparison between March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021: departmental and executive (EX) employment equity representation

AAFC representation

March 31, 2020

March 31, 2021

Difference

Representation (%)

Workforce availability estimates (%)

Gap (number)

Representation (%)

Workforce availability estimates (%)

Gap (number)

Representation (%)

Workforce availability estimates (%)

Gap (number)

Indigenous People

2.9

3.9

-47

3.3

3.8

-25

0.4

-0.1

22

Persons with Disabilities

4.6

8.5

-190

4.8

8.5

-184

0.2

0.0

6

Visible Minorities

16.7

14.0

131

17.5

14.2

161

0.8

0.2

30

 

Executive representation

March 31, 2020

March 31, 2021

Difference

Representation (%)

Workforce availability estimates (%)

Gap (number)

Representation (%)

Workforce availability estimates (%)

Gap (number)

Representation (%)

Workforce availability estimates (%)

Gap (number)

Indigenous People

0.0

4.6

-5

2.6

4.5

-2

2.6

-0.1

3

Persons with Disabilities

5.9

5.3

1

3.4

5.3

-2

-2.5

0.0

-3

Visible Minorities

9.3

11.8

-3

10.3

11.9

-2

1.0

0.1

1

Notes

Workforce availability estimates are based on the 2016 Census or, in the case of Persons with Disabilities, the 2017 Canadian Survey on Disability. Gaps represent the difference between the current number of employees who have self-identified and the number of employees expected based on the workforce availability estimate.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada data is as of March 31, 2021, indeterminate and terms of more than three months. Data for occupational groups of 10 employees or fewer have been suppressed for privacy reasons.

Comparison between March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021 executive (EX) new hires, promotions and separation rates

 

March 31, 2020

March 31, 2021

Difference

Employment equity new hires (%)

Employment equity promotion rate (%)

Employment equity separation rate (%)

Employment equity new hires (%)

Employment equity promotion rate (%)

Employment equity separation rate (%)

Employment equity new hires (percentage point change)

Employment equity promotion rate (percentage point change)

Employment equity separation rates (percentage point change)

Share of population

4.2

9.3

2.5

12.0

14.5

14.5

7.7

5.2

12.0

Indigenous People

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.9

0.9

0.0

0.9

0.9

Persons with Disabilities

0.0

0.8

0.0

0.9

0.0

0.0

0.9

-0.8

0.0

Visible Minorities

1.7

2.6

0.0

0.0

0.9

2.6

-1.7

-1.7

2.6

Annex D — List of actions completed, underway or planned

The list includes some initiatives recently completed, underway or planned that bolster the calls to action in support of anti-racism, equity and inclusion at AAFC. Actions are grouped into three priority areas that reflect the 9 specific Calls to Action by the Clerk that also align with the three pillars of our Diversity and Inclusion Plan. This is not a complete list of actions, rather some of the newly developed initiatives in support of anti-racism, equity, diversity and inclusion.

Increasing representation of Indigenous, Black and other racialized people, as well as persons with disabilities through targeted recruitment, staffing and development activities

Creating a more inclusive workplace by fostering an inclusive workplace culture where employees feel engaged, supported and able to contribute in an environment of mutual respect

AAFC has five well-established employee-led Diversity and Inclusion Networks, each championed by Assistant Deputy Ministers and supported by Executive Leads and a Diversity and Inclusion Network Secretariat. Together, the Networks serve as a safe place for discussion, creating a sense of community and supporting the mental health of members. The Networks provide a grassroots level engagement and they are significant contributors to many learning and commemorative opportunities that raise awareness. Some of the activities undertaken by the Networks over the past year include:

To increase knowledge and awareness on a range of topics like reconciliation, accessibility, anti-racism, equity and inclusion, and fostering a safe, positive environment, the Department has launched several learning and awareness initiatives:

Enhancing leadership, accountability and monitoring to ensure a strong and sustained commitment to diversity and inclusion with senior management

Annex E — AAFC Diversity and Inclusion Index

The Diversity and Inclusion Index is composed of key performance indicators that measure the department’s performance against the long-term goals of the Diversity and Inclusion agenda.

These indicators were established in collaboration with the department’s diversity and inclusion network, other employee networks, and after consulting research on best practices. The index scores associated with each indicator provide a method of comparing performance across different types of information.

The Diversity indicators measure the representation of equity seeking groups in the workforce in general, as well as in leadership positions in the workforce.

Meeting the Workforce Availability Estimate (WAE), or representation target, for each group results in an index score of 7. Exceeding this target will result in a higher score, to a maximum of 10. Lower representation will reduce the index score, to a minimum of zero.

The Inclusion indicators are key questions taken from the Public Service Employee Survey (PSES). The questions reflect how AAFC employees feel about their workplace. As well as questions representing the basic needs of respect, safety and trust in the workplace, there are also questions that define a more positive workplace in which all employees can enjoy working.

When all employees respond positively to a question, representing a workplace inclusive to all equity seeking groups, an index score of 10 is received. For each full five percent below this, one index point is lost.

The overall index scores for both diversity and inclusion are calculated by adding up each individual index score, and reflect an overall assessment of performance in each area.

Historical data has been incorporated in the Index to allow the department to assess performance over time. The key indicators may evolve in the future to include additional information and assessment as the department’s priorities evolve.

AAFC Diversity and Inclusion Index — prototype and calculations

2021 Diversity Index
 

Representation (%)

Target (%)

Ratio (%)

Index Score (Out of 10)

Women

51.7

50.4

102.5

8

Women Leaders

26.6

30.4

87.6

5

Indigenous

3.3

3.8

86.6

5

Indigenous Leaders

20.2

28.7

70.4

2

Visible Minority

17.5

14.2

122.9

10

Visible Minority Leaders

30.3

28.1

108.0

9

Persons with Disabilities

4.8

8.5

56.3

0

Persons with Disabilities Leaders

23.6

28.7

82.3

4

Diversity Overall Index Score

     

43/80

Target = 100% (Index Score of 7)

       
2020 Diversity Index
 

Representation (%)

Target (%)

Ratio (%)

Index Score (Out of 10)

Women

51.8

50.4

102.9

8

Women Leaders

25.8

31.2

82.6

4

Indigenous

2.9

3.9

75.4

3

Indigenous Leaders

14.7

28.8

51.0

0

Visible Minority

16.7

14.0

119.2

10

Visible Minority Leaders

30.0

28.0

107.1

9

Persons with Disabilities

4.6

8.5

54.2

0

Persons with Disabilities Leaders

22.2

28.7

77.5

3

Diversity Overall Index Score

     

37/80

Target = 100% (Index Score of 7)

       
2019 Diversity Index
 

Representation (%)

Target (%)

Ratio (%)

Index Score (Out of 10)

Women

51.8

49.2

105.3

9

Women Leaders

26.4

33.1

79.7

3

Indigenous

3.1

3.4

91.7

6

Indigenous Leaders

14.9

30.1

49.5

0

Visible Minority

15.7

11.2

139.8

10

Visible Minority Leaders

34.8

28.7

121.3

10

Persons with Disabilities

4.1

8.5

48.6

0

Persons with Disabilities Leaders

21.4

30.0

71.2

2

Diversity Overall Index Score

     

40/80

Target = 100% (Index Score of 7)

       
2021 Inclusion Index
 

Results (%)

Index Score (Out of 10)

Overall, I feel valued at work.

73

5

I have opportunities to provide input into decisions that affect my work.

76

6

In my work unit, individuals behave in a respectful manner.

84

7

The people I work with value my ideas and opinions.

83

7

My department or agency does a good job of supporting employee career development.

56

2

I think that my department or agency respects individual differences (for example, culture, work styles, ideas, abilities).

79

6

My department or agency works hard to create a workplace that prevents discrimination.

74

5

My immediate supervisor supports my mental health and well-being.

79

6

I would describe my workplace as being psychologically healthy.

70

4

Inclusion Overall Index Score

 

48/90

Target = 100% (Index Score of 10)

   

2020 Inclusion Index

 

Results (%)

Index Score (Out of 10)

Overall, I feel valued at work.

72

5

I have opportunities to provide input into decisions that affect my work.

73

5

In my work unit, individuals behave in a respectful manner.

82

7

The people I work with value my ideas and opinions.

83

7

My department or agency does a good job of supporting employee career development.

56

2

I think that my department or agency respects individual differences (e.g., culture, work styles, ideas, abilities).

80

6

My department or agency works hard to create a workplace that prevents discrimination.

76

6

My immediate supervisor seems to care about me as a person.

85

7

I would describe my workplace as being psychologically healthy.

66

4

Inclusion Overall Index Score

 

49/90

Target = 100% (Index Score of 10)

   
2019 Inclusion Index
 

Results (%)

Index Score (Out of 10)

Overall, I feel valued at work.

70

4

I have opportunities to provide input into decisions that affect my work.

70

4

In my work unit, individuals behave in a respectful manner.

78

6

The people I work with value my ideas and opinions.

79

6

My department or agency does a good job of supporting employee career development.

50

0

I think that my department or agency respects individual differences (e.g., culture, work styles, ideas, abilities).

82

7

My department or agency works hard to create a workplace that prevents discrimination.

73

5

My immediate supervisor seems to care about me as a person.

80

6

I would describe my workplace as being psychologically healthy.

63

3

Inclusion Overall Index Score

 

41/90

Target = 100% (Index Score of 10)

   

Model 1- Example calculations

Example 1 (Diversity): Targets and index scores for AAFC workforce availability for employment equity groups and leaders

(%)

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

+5

+10

+15

Target (%)

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

Index score

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Example 2 (Inclusiveness): Targets and index scores for a PSES result target of 100%

(%)

0

-5

-10

-15

-20

-25

-30

-35

-40

-45

-50

Target (%)

100

95

90

85

80

75

70

65

60

55

50

Index score

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Page details

Date modified: