Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) 2022 Executive Summary: Key and Integrated Findings

Download the alternative format
(PDF format, 260.1 KB, 9 pages)

Organization: Public Health Agency of Canada

Published: 2024-03-XX

Table of contents

CIPARS 2022 Executive summary: Key and integrated findings

The Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) monitors trends in antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in select foodborne bacterial species from people, animal, and food sources across Canada.

Please see the CIPARS web pages for more detailed information on AMU and AMR by surveillance component, host species, and bacterial species.

A tribute to Dr. Michael Mulvey

We dedicate this work in memory of our colleague, mentor, and friend: Dr. Michael (Mike) R. Mulvey. This "Super-Bug Fighter" was passionate and committed to the battle against AMR. He was a pillar to the CIPARS program from its inception over 20 years ago and his contributions (intellect, experience, and resourcefulness) were instrumental to the conception, design, and expansion of the program. Mike's legacy will echo in CIPARS for countless years to come as we work to support measures to contain the emergence and spread of AMR.

Integrated antimicrobial sales data

Veterinary antimicrobial sales reporting (VASR) data

While sales of medically important antimicrobials have decreased overall since 2018 by 11% (after adjusting for animal biomass), the quantity of antimicrobial sales has remained fairly stable since 2019. It is important to note that the first two years of VASR (2018, and 2019) was a time of regulatory and policy changes implemented by Health Canada to promote the responsible use of antimicrobials in animals. Since 2018, antimicrobial sales (after adjusting for animal biomass) have decreased for pigs, poultry, and aquaculture, and increased for cattle, cats and dogs, horses, and small ruminants.

While the majority of antimicrobial sales continue to be Category II and III antimicrobials, and the quantity of Category I antimicrobials sold was relatively small, there was a 6% increase in Category I antimicrobial sales (adjusted for biomass) between 2021 and 2022.

In 2022, there were more than 22 times more animals than people in Canada. When we considered the quantity of antimicrobial sales in kilograms, 80% of antimicrobials were sold for use in production animals (including food animals and horses), 19% for humans, less than 1% for cats and dogs, and less than 1% for crops. When providing the necessary context of the relevant biomass, 1.5 times more antimicrobials were sold for use in production animals than people.

Resistance to antimicrobials of very high importance to human medicineReference 1

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Salmonella

Carbapenem resistance

Mobile colistin resistance

Resistance to other antimicrobials of very high importance to human medicine, including resistance to ciprofloxacin, are reported in the relevant CIPARS components below.

Integrated antimicrobial resistance findings

Human

Salmonella: Since 2020, resistance profiles for all human Salmonella (approximately 5000 per year) has been determined using whole genome sequencing (WGS)Reference 2.

Campylobacter: Campylobacter isolates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing were made available to CIPARS through FoodNet Canada and its community-based sentinel site surveillance for foodborne and waterborne diseases, and exposures (2017 to 2021). This reporting is new to CIPARS.

Extensively drug-resistant Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- from humans

Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- (resistant to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, trimethoprim/sulfonamides) was found within the CIPARS program in 2021 (n = 7) and 2022 (n = 14), including cases in children. Extensively drug-resistant Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i- has not been observed in the animal or food components of CIPARS.

Nalidixic acid resistance in Salmonella Enteritidis from broiler chickens and raw chicken meat

Starting in 2018, nalidixic acid-resistant S. Enteritidis from broiler chicken(s) was observed in a small but notable number of isolates from multiple CIPARS components. Historically, the majority of S. Enteritidis isolates from CIPARS were susceptible to all tested antimicrobials. In 2022, CIPARS continued to observe nalidixic acid-resistant S. Enteritidis from healthy broiler chickens on farm (n = 15), samples from healthy chickens at abattoir (n = 9), samples of grocery store chicken (n = 12), and samples from sick chickens (n = 11); recognizing that sick animals do not enter the food chain.

Gentamicin resistance in Campylobacter from animals and food (raw retail meat)

Historically, gentamicin resistance was not observed in Campylobacter in animals and food from CIPARS components. However, since 2019, gentamicin resistance in Campylobacter was observed in multiple CIPARS components. Starting in 2019, a gentamicin-resistant Campylobacter isolate (n = 1) was found in a sample from feedlot cattle. At abattoir, resistance to gentamicin was found in isolates from pigs (n = 2 isolates), and from chickens (n = 1 isolate) in 2021, and in 2022 from cattle (n = 2 isolates), and pigs (n = 1 isolate). From grocery stores, resistance to gentamicin was not found from chicken and turkeyReference 4.

Enterococcus from poultry (2021; most recent data available) and feedlot cattle on farm and antimicrobial resistanceReference 5

Broiler chickens: In 2021, the most common Enterococcus species recovered was E. faecalis (63%), followed by E. faecium (22%)Reference 6. Resistance to vancomycin, tigecycline, daptomycin, or linezolid was not observed. Resistance to ampicillin or nitrofurantoin was not observed in E. faecalis. However, 7% of E. faecalis were resistant to gentamicin, 2% were resistant to avilamycin, and less than 1% were resistant to ciprofloxacin. For E. faecium, 83% of isolates were resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin, 36% to ciprofloxacin, 21% were resistant to each of avilamycin and nitrofurantoin, and 5% were resistant to ampicillin. Gentamicin resistance was not observed in E. faecium.

Layer chickens: In 2021, the most common species recovered was E. faecalis (83%), followed by E. faecium (9%)Reference 7. Resistance to ampicillin, avilamycin, chloramphenicol, daptomycin, linezolid, nitrofurantoin, tigecycline, or vancomycin was not observed. Gentamicin resistance (3%) was observed in E. faecalis. For E. faecium, 50% (n = 4) of isolates were resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin and 25% (n = 2) were resistant to ciprofloxacin.

Turkeys: In 2021, the most common species recovered was E. faecalis (75%), followed by E. faecium (15%)Reference 8. Resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, linezolid, tigecycline, or vancomycin was not observed. Resistance to ciprofloxacin or daptomycin were not observed in E. faecalis. However, 3% of E. faecalis were resistant to avilamycin, and 2% were resistant to gentamicin. For E. faecium, 89% of isolates were resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin, 56% to ciprofloxacin, 30% to nitrofurantoin, and 22% were resistant to avilamycin.

Feedlot cattle: In 2022, the Enterococcus species recovered were E. hirae (63%), E. faecalis (16%), E. faecium (16%), E. casseliflavus (2%), E. durans (2%), and E. gallinarium (0.6%)Reference 9. Resistance to gentamicin or vancomycin was not observed in any Enterococcus isolates. Resistance to linezolid or penicillin was not observed in E. hirae. However, 39% of E. hirae were resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin, 25% were resistant to daptomycin, 7% were resistant to tigecycline, and 1% were resistant to each of ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin. For E. faecalis, resistance to nitrofurantoin or penicillin was not observed. However, 10% of E. faecalis isolates were resistant to tigecycline, 4% of isolates were resistant to linezolid, and 2% were resistant to daptomycin. For E. faecium, there was no resistance to linezolid. However, 26% of E. faecium isolates were resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin, 18% of isolates were resistant to daptomycin, 16% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 4% were resistant to tigecycline, and 2% were resistant to each of nitrofurantoin and penicillin.

Integrated antimicrobial use and resistance findings

Reported Category I antimicrobial use and Category I antimicrobial resistance in isolates from healthy animals or food

Category I reported AMU on farm: In 2022, the reported use of Category I antimicrobials from CIPARS volunteer sentinel farms (broiler chicken, turkey, grower-finisher pigs, and feedlot cattle), was a very small fraction of the overall reported AMU (less than 0.2%).

Ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli and SalmonellaReference 10: The trend (2018 to 2022), and observation of ceftriaxone resistance in E. coli and Salmonella from multiple surveillance components (samples from healthy animals at farm, abattoir, and raw meat from grocery stores) showed similar patterns. The general trend in resistance was either decreasing or stable.

Ciprofloxacin-resistant CampylobacterReference 11: The trend (2018 to 2022) in ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter from multiple surveillance components (samples from healthy animals at farm, abattoir, and raw meat from grocery stores) showed similar patterns. The general trend in resistance was increasing.

Antimicrobial resistance in animal pathogens

Starting in 2019, CIPARS collected antimicrobial resistance data on three major bovine respiratory disease (BRD) pathogens (Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni) from feedlot cattle. In 2022, resistance was observed in 10% or less of the BRD bacterial isolates recovered from nasopharyngeal samples of healthy cattle collected at arrival to the feedlot. Resistance varied by BRD bacteria, and was observed in up to 61% of isolates when cattle were tested later in the feeding period at rehandling. Less than 5% of isolates were resistant to Category I antimicrobials.

Important: Laboratory method change affecting reporting of results

Antimicrobial resistance prediction using whole genome sequencing: Salmonella resistance to ciprofloxacin

Technical information: Starting January 1, 2020, determination of AMR for human Salmonella changed from using microbroth dilution to AMR prediction from WGS. Validation tests performed by the National Microbiology Laboratory found that prediction of AMR from WGS is accurate and reliable, but the categorization has changed for ciprofloxacin. With AMR prediction, most isolates are reported as non-resistant (susceptible (S) or intermediate (I)), or resistant (R). However, for ciprofloxacin, the method does not discriminate between intermediate and resistant, and results are reported as susceptible (S) or non-susceptible (I/R).

The impact: Prior to 2020, using microbroth dilution, the overall frequency of ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella from humans was less than 5%. From 2020 to 2022, using WGS, the overall frequency of Salmonella isolates that were non-susceptible to ciprofloxacin was higher (more than 15%). This difference was larger for specific serovars (e.g., S. Enteritidis). There is work underway to harmonize findings for comparison before and after the widespread implementation of WGS for human Salmonella. Whole genome sequencing has been applied in various CIPARS components to contextualize and better understand the findings. CIPARS is looking forward to further expansion of this powerful tool in the understanding of the molecular epidemiology of AMR, including the broader implementation across all CIPARS components.

References

Reference 1

Health Canada. Categorization of Antimicrobial Drugs Based on Importance in Human Medicine (version April 2009). Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/veterinary-drugs/antimicrobial-resistance/categorization-antimicrobial-drugs-based-importance-human-medicine.html. Accessed on January 18, 2024.

Return to reference 1

Reference 2

Details of this change and its impact on reporting are described at the end of the document.

Return to reference 2

Reference 3

Resistance is reported for ceftriaxone; non-susceptibility is reported for ciprofloxacin. See description regarding the change to AMR prediction using WGS at the end of the document.

Return to reference 3

Reference 4

Samples of raw pork and beef from grocery stores were not tested for Campylobacter.

Return to reference 4

Reference 5

Enterococcus faecalis are naturally or intrinsically resistant to quinupristin-dalfopristin; therefore data are not reported. No Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretative criteria for Enterococcus and avilamycin were available, so the 2021 National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System for Enteric Bacteria (NARMS) interpretative criteria for susceptibility testing were used: https://www.fda.gov/media/108180/download. Accessed on February 14, 2024.

Return to reference 5

Reference 6

For this host, routine laboratory testing only determined species for Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium. For the remaining Enterococcus isolated, the Enterococcus species was not determined.

Return to reference 6

Reference 7

For this host, routine laboratory testing only determined species for Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium. For the remaining Enterococcus isolated, the Enterococcus species was not determined.

Return to reference 7

Reference 8

For this host, routine laboratory testing only determined species for Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium. For the remaining Enterococcus isolated, the Enterococcus species was not determined.

Return to reference 8

Reference 9

For this host, routine laboratory testing did not test for additional Enterococcus species. For the remaining Enterococcus isolated, the Enterococcus species was not determined.

Return to reference 9

Reference 10

Routine surveillance started in 2019 for feedlot beef cattle and the trend is reported from 2019. Routine surveillance started in 2019 for dairy cattle and the trend is reported from 2019 to 2021. The detection of Salmonella was too low (<30 isolates per year) for robust interpretation of trends in resistance for feedlot cattle. Routine surveillance does not isolate Salmonella from cattle at abattoir, ground beef, or pork as historically the occurrence is below the limit of detection.

Return to reference 10

Reference 11

Routine surveillance started in 2019 for feedlot beef cattle and the trend is reported from 2019. Routine surveillance started in 2019 for dairy cattle and the trend is reported from 2019 to 2021. Routine surveillance does not isolate Campylobacter from ground beef, or pork as historically the occurrence is below the limit of detection.

Return to reference 11

Page details

Date modified: