How does protein content affect bread wheat functionality?
Dr. Bin Xiao Fu
Research scientist/program manager
Bread Wheat and Durum Research
binxiao.fu@grainscanada.gc.ca
The Bread Wheat and Durum Research Program supports the Canadian wheat quality assurance system in many ways. We analyze the quality of new crops, evaluate new wheat lines in registration trials, provide the scientific basis for wheat grade tolerances and monitor wheat cargoes. Our research focuses on understanding how the physicochemical and biochemical properties of wheat influence its quality and we develop new techniques for evaluating wheat quality.
We recently undertook a study to better understand the influence of protein on the processing performance of AAC Brandon, the dominant variety of Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS) wheat. Although both protein content and composition are crucial to wheat functional quality, it has been challenging to isolate one from another in understanding their contribution to wheat processing performance. During drought, protein levels in wheat can increase and the hot and dry growing season of 2021 in Western Canada presented a unique opportunity to source samples of AAC Brandon with a larger than usual range of protein content. Using these samples, we measured variations in milling performance, dough properties and baking quality with changing protein content. We also examined protein composition to understand the biochemical basis for the variations in functionality that were observed.
Wheat samples and flour quality
Samples of AAC Brandon (No. 2 CWRS or better) were blended into 7 aggregates according to their protein content. Aggregates were divided into groups of 11.5%, 12.6%, 13.6%, 14.5%, 15.6%, 16.6%, and 17.7% protein. We found that test weight decreased gradually with increasing protein (Figure 1a). The test weight for each aggregate was, however, above the minimum requirement for No. 1 CWRS (79 kg/hL). Flour samples were prepared using a Bühler MLU 202 laboratory mill with a constant extraction rate of 74% for comparative analysis. Milling yield increased for aggregates with protein content ranging from 11.5% to 14.5% but decreased for aggregates with higher protein content due to a decrease in kernel size and test weight (Figure 1b).
Dough properties and end-product quality
Dough properties were measured by Farinograph and Extensigraph following AACC International Methods. The results from our tests on the AAC Brandon aggregates are given in Table 1. The mixing requirement, as indicated by dough development time, was found to increase as protein content increased. Dough strength, measured by maximum resistance (Rmax) and stability, was also found to increase with protein content. Dough extensibility showed an upward trend with increased protein content.
Baking quality was determined with the Canadian Short Process (CSP) and the Sponge and Dough (S&D) bake tests. Results from the S&D bake test showed that loaf volume increased with increasing protein content (Figure 2) but no change in volume was observed using the CSP bake test. We analyzed bread crumb texture with a TA.XT2 Texture Analyzer using a Texture Profile Analysis test. Loaves produced by both the CSP and S&D bake tests showed a decrease in crumb hardness as protein content increased (Figure 3).
Flour protein and functional protein fractions
Flour proteins were fractionated into monomeric proteins (MP), soluble glutenins (SG), and insoluble glutenins (IG). The absolute quantity of IG in flour from AAC Brandon aggregates was found to increase linearly with protein content while the percentage of IG in the total amount of protein remained largely unchanged (Figure 4). We also found that the sum amount of SG and MP increased proportionally with IG (Figure 5).
Insoluble glutenins were analyzed using reversed-phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography (RP UPLC). The 45% 1-propanol insoluble glutenin fraction was reduced and alkylated before separation with a BEH C4 300Å column. Our results confirmed that the total amount of IG was directly related to flour protein content and that little change was seen in the proportion of IG in total protein when the results were normalized to a protein content of 13.5%. (Table 2).
Conclusions
- Milling yield increased as protein content increased from 11.5% to 14.5% but decreased as protein content increased further.
- AAC Brandon had well-balanced dough properties across a wide range of protein content: dough strength and dough development time increased with protein content, and extensibility had an upward trend.
- The positive correlation between dough strength and protein content in AAC Brandon was due to an increase in the total amount of insoluble glutenins, not its proportion in total protein.
- The well-balanced dough properties of all AAC Brandon aggregates can be attributed to the relatively constant ratio of insoluble glutenins to the sum of monomeric proteins and soluble glutenins.
- Loaf volume increased with protein content when measured using the S&D bake test.
- Bread crumb hardness decreased with increasing protein content.
Graph data
| AAC Brandon protein aggregates (%) | Test weight (kg/hL) | Milling yield (%) |
| 11.5 | 82.2 | 75.7 |
| 12.6 | 81.7 | 75.8 |
| 13.6 | 81.3 | 76.3 |
| 14.5 | 81.2 | 76.5 |
| 15.6 | 80.8 | 76.5 |
| 16.6 | 80.3 | 74.9 |
| 17.7 | 79.5 | 74.3 |
Graph data
| AAC Brandon protein aggregates (%) | Crumb hardness (Canadian Short Process) | Crumb hardness (Sponge and Dough) |
| 11.9 | 13.5 | 15.1 |
| 183.3 | 179.8 | 163.1 |
| 138.0 | 115.4 | 109.2 |
| 16.8 | 154.4 | 106.2 |
Graph data
| Flour protein (%) | Quantity of insoluble glutenins (AbsFootnote 1 210 nmFootnote 2) | Proportion of insoluble glutenins in total protein (%) |
| 10.55 | 0.35 | 17.73 |
| 11.68 | 0.39 | 17.69 |
| 12.83 | 0.44 | 18.58 |
| 13.67 | 0.47 | 18.64 |
| 14.67 | 0.51 | 18.94 |
| 15.77 | 0.56 | 18.94 |
| 17.13 | 0.61 | 18.95 |
Table 1 Notes
| ||
Graph data
| Flour protein (%) | Ratio of IG/SG | Ratio of IG/(MP + SG) |
| 10.55 | 0.673 | 0.215 |
| 11.68 | 0.689 | 0.215 |
| 12.83 | 0.757 | 0.228 |
| 13.67 | 0.775 | 0.229 |
| 14.67 | 0.813 | 0.234 |
| 15.77 | 0.832 | 0.234 |
| 17.13 | 0.857 | 0.234 |
| Dough property | 11.5% | 12.6% | 13.6% | 14.5% | 15.6% | 16.6% | 17.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farinogram | |||||||
| Absorption, % | 62.5 | 62.9 | 63.3 | 63.6 | 64.5 | 66.4 | 63.3 |
| Dough development time, minFootnote 1 | 3.25 | 6.25 | 6.75 | 9.25 | 11.25 | 9.50 | 14.50 |
| Stability, min | 8.0 | 12.0 | 13.5 | 14.5 | 16.5 | 15.5 | 20.0 |
| Extensigraph | |||||||
| Strength (Rmax), BUFootnote 2 | 465 | 556 | 554 | 614 | 646 | 598 | 732 |
| Extensibility (length), cmFootnote 3 | 19.5 | 18.4 | 20.4 | 19.3 | 20.5 | 22.0 | 21.2 |
| Area, cm2Footnote 4 | 119 | 130 | 146 | 153 | 171 | 168 | 197 |
Table 1 Notes
| |||||||
| Subunit composition | 11.5% | 12.6% | 13.6% | 14.5% | 15.6% | 16.6% | 17.7% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insoluble glutenins (peak area x 106) | |||||||
| High molecular weight (HMW) glutenin subunits | 4.6 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Low molecular weight (LMW) glutenin subunits | 11.7 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 11.8 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 11.6 |
| Total area insoluble glutenins | 16.3 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 17.1 | 17.4 | 17.4 |
| HMW/LMW | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.50 |
Table 1 Notes
| |||||||
Team members
Research scientist/program manager
- Dr. Bin Xiao Fu
Chemists
- Dr. Kun Wang
- Carly Isaak
- Ray Bacala
Technicians
- Altash Yirdaw
- Alyssa Hilapo
- Angelique Parajas
- Andrea Iverson
- Dale Taylor
- Jerry Suchy (retired)
- Joseffus Santos
- Katherine Cordova
- Shermy Jayasekara
- Ofelia Francisco-Pabalan (retired)
- Yuming Chen
Recent publications
- Wang, K., Pozniak, C.J., Ruan, Y. and B.X. Fu. 2022. Unveiling the impact of durum wheat protein quantity and quality on textural properties and micro-structure of cooked pasta. Cereal Chem. 100 (2): 484-499.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10627 - Bacala, R., Hatcher, D.W., Perreault, H. and B.X. Fu. 2022. Challenges and opportunities for proteomics and the improvement of bread wheat quality. J. Plant Physiol. 275: 153743.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2022.153743 - Sarkar, A.; and B.X. Fu. 2022. Impact of quality improvement and milling innovations on durum wheat and end products. Foods 11 (12): 1796.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121796 - Walkowiak, S., Taylor, D., Fu, B.X., Drul, D., Pleskach, K. and S.A. Tittlemier. 2022. Ergot in Canadian cereals – relevance, occurrence, and current status. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 44(6): 793-805
https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2022.2077451 - Oduro-Obeng, H., Apea-Bah, F.B., Wang, K., Fu, B.X. and T. Beta. 2022. Effect of cooking duration on carotenoid content, digestion and potential absorption efficiencies among refined semolina and whole wheat pasta products. Food Funct. 13: 5953-5970.
https://doi.org/10.1039/D2FO00611A




