Briefing binder created for the Deputy Minister of Finance on the occasion of his appearance before the Standing Committee on Finance on March 21, 2024 on Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the fall economic statement tabled in Parliament on November 21, 2023 and certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023, and the Main Estimates 2024-25 

Alcohol Excise Duty Inflation Adjustment

Issue

Despite the March 9 alcohol excise duty relief announcement, the Conservative Party may continue to advocate against the upcoming increase to excise duty rates.

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. Why did this government not entirely eliminate the inflation adjustment mechanism?

The government capped the inflation adjustment mechanism last year, and has proposed an extension of the cap for another two years.

The inflation adjustment mechanism only ensures that alcohol excise duties stay constant in real dollar terms. Even before the cap, the increase reflects less than one cent per standard drink. Maintaining this effectiveness over time is an important part of ensuring that alcohol excise duties meet their health objectives.

Under the 2 per cent cap, excise duties are declining in real terms and as a proportion of the retail price of alcohol products.

2. Why do reduced rates apply only to the first 15,000 hL of beer brewed in Canada and not for all reduced rate tiers (up to 75,000 hL)?

The government chose to target local community breweries with this relief. Data shows 94 per cent of breweries in Canada produce below the 15,000 hL threshold. The new reduced rates are, with the exception of Germany, the lowest excise duty rates on beer in the G7.

3. Why is there no support for the wine industry?

The government is supporting the wine industry with the Wine Sector Support Program (WSSP). Originally launched in 2022, the government announced a 3-year extension to the WSSP on March 1, 2024. This three-year extension provides an investment of up to $177 million, bringing total support under the program to $343 million.

Background

Alcohol excise duty rates are adjusted automatically for inflation on April 1 of each year. In 2023, the inflation adjustment factor was set to be 6.3 per cent. The government introduced a 2 per cent cap in Budget 2023 for (at the time) one year only. For the upcoming fiscal year, the inflation adjustment factor is set to be 4.7 per cent.

On March 9, the Minister of Finance and Minister of Small Business jointly announced that the government is proposing to:

Maintaining the effectiveness of excise duties is an important measure in ensuring the health of Canadians. While a few years of excise duty declines in real terms are not likely to cause changes in demand, over time, the decline of excise duties in real terms could result in increased alcohol consumption. According to the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction, alcohol use resulted in 18,000 deaths in Canada in 2017 and has been linked to increased risk of cancer, heart disease, liver disease, and stroke.

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

Issue

On June 14, 2023, the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance asked the Department of Finance to review allegations made against the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) by a former Canadian senior manager at the bank. The Deputy Prime Minister also announced that Canada was halting all activities with the AIIB, pending the outcome of this review.

The Deputy Prime Minister issued an update on Canada's AIIB review on December 8, 2023. As noted in the statement, Canada is continuing its review of the AIIB in consultation with some of its closest international partners. While Canada's engagement with its partners continues, Canada's participation in the AIIB will remain indefinitely suspended. 

Key Points

Background

Bank of Canada Negative Equity

Issue

Bank of Canada losses and negative equity may be raised during the Deputy Minister's appearance before the Standing Committee on Finance.

Key Points

Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) Loans

Issue

The final repayment deadline to still receive partial forgiveness for the Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) program is March 28, 2024.

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. What are the CEBA repayment deadlines?

The repayment deadline to receive forgiveness of up to $20,000 was January 18, 2024. For CEBA loan holders who applied for refinancing with the financial institution that provided their CEBA loan by January 18, 2024, the repayment deadline to qualify for partial loan forgiveness included a refinancing extension until March 28, 2024.

As of January 19, 2024, outstanding loans, including those that are captured by the refinancing extension, converted to three-year term loans, subject to interest of 5 percent per annum, with the term loan repayment date extended by an additional year from December 31, 2025, to December 31, 2026.

If prompted on ineligible loan holders:

Ineligible loan holders (about 6% of the CEBA loan holder population) did not qualify for partial loan forgiveness and were required to repay the CEBA loan by December 31, 2023 (i.e., their loan did not convert to a three-year term loan). As of January 31, 2024, official reporting shows that approximately 13,000 ineligible loans have been fully repaid and 37,500 are outstanding. The outstanding principal of ineligible loans is $1.35 billion.

2. What will happen to businesses that cannot repay by the applicable deadline?

Regardless of eligibility, in the period of 45 days after default, the loan holder's financial institution will contact them twice to request repayment of the outstanding debt, followed by the issuance of a demand letter. After 30 days (total 75-day period), if they are unable to meet their CEBA payment obligations, their loan will likely be assigned to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) for collection efforts.

The CRA will work with each business to determine its ability to repay, emphasizing fairness, empathy, and putting people first. The CRA will review the loan holder's circumstances on a case-by-case basis and may work with them to establish a payment arrangement or repayment plan tailored to their ability to repay.

3. What are the statistics on CEBA repayments?

Official reporting from Export Development Canada (EDC) indicates that as of March 15, 2024, total repayments for all CEBA loans are $27.4 billion, forgiveness reported by financial institutions is $11.7 billion, and outstanding principal is $9.9 billion (approximately 80% of loan value repaid).

This is an underestimation, as it does not account for partial loan forgiveness in March and it only accounts for repayments that had flowed back to EDC as there may be a few-days lag between when a loan is repaid at an FI and when EDC is repaid.

Background

Collections and Enforcement

Administration

Contracting

Issue

Recent changes have been made to procurement practices to meet evolving requirements and ensure greater oversight and controls over procurement activities within the department. These changes are also in response to the recent audit findings by the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) and the Office of the Procurement Ombudsman (OPO) audits on McKinsey contracts, the OAG audit findings on ArriveCAN as well as current scrutiny from the public and parliamentary committees around the procurement function.

Key Points

Background

The department's total contracting activity for CY 2023 represented 155 contracts and amendments valued over $10K for a total of $9,781,563. This amount includes both contracts awarded by FIN, and by PSPC or SSC on the department's behalf.

The Department's contracting activity specific to Professional and Special Services contracts valued over $10K is below. All contracts were awarded by FIN.

Table 1
Professional and Special Services contracts valued over $10K
Description Number of Transactions Contracting Activity ($)
Other Professional Services 21 $1,204,354
Language Training 13 $914,994
IT Consultants 2 $74,591
Protection Services 2 $67,550
Accounting and Audit Services 2 $65,540
Other Business Services 4 $55,538
Translation Services 1 $39,916
Temporary Help Services 2 $25,724
Hospitality 1 $23,814
Management Consulting 1 $19,617
Total 49 $2,491,638

Note: Values are based on awarded contract value, not total expenditures. Information is from the Open Government website.

Finance Responses to House Committee Requests for Contracts (2023-)

1. Contracts and agreements with McKinsey since 2011 - Government Operations Committee (March 2023)

2. Contracts with GCStrategies, Dalian, and Coradix - Government Operations Committee (October 2023)

3. Contracts with GCStrategies, Dalian, and Coradix – Public Accounts Committee (December 2023)

4. Contracts with companies incorporated by the co-founders of GCStrategies – Public Accounts Committee (March 2024)

Debt Management Strategy

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

Update of the Debt Management Strategy (FES 2023)

1. Why did the government increase borrowing in the 2023 Fall Economic Statement (FES)?

2. What effect do higher interest rates have on debt service costs?

3. What is the government's average term to maturity?

4. Will the increase in borrowing impact Canada's AAA credit rating?

5. Will this increase cause Canada to breach the Parliamentary Borrowing Authority?

6. What's the 1-month treasury-bill item mentioned in FES 2023?

2024-25 DMS Estimates

7. What is the government's expectation with respect to borrowing in 2024-25?

Canada Mortgage Bonds

8. What is the government doing regarding Canada Mortgage Bonds?

9. How will the purchase of CMBs affect the government's debt?

Annual Borrowing Authority

10. Why was the borrowing limit for 2023-24 increased or why did borrowing needs increase if deficit remained the same?

11. What is the annual borrowing limit for 2024-25?

Borrowing Authority Act

12. What is the Borrowing Authority Act?

13. What is the Borrowing Authority Act Report and when will it be published?

14. What are our plans for the maximum borrowing limit?

ESG Debt Program

15. What was the rationale for including nuclear energy in Canada's Green Bond Framework?

Annex 1

Table 2
Summary of Changes in the DMS (Budget 2023 vs FES 2023)
  Budget 2023 FES 2023
Total Borrowing Needs1 421 492
Refinancing Needs 358 3812
Financial Requirement 63 111
Debt Charges 43.9 46.5
Debt charges to GDP 1.6 1.6

Sources: Department of Finance Calculations, Bank of Canada

Note:
1 This includes $7 billion raised through issuance in foreign currencies.

2 This includes the amount required to pre-fund the April 1, 2024 maturity.

Table 3
Projected Gross Domestic3 Issuance of Bonds and Bills for 2023-24
  2022-23
Actual
2023-24
Budget 2023
2023-24
FES 2023
Change from Budget 2023
Treasury Bills 202 242 281 39
2-year 67 76 86 10
3-year 20 6 6 0
5-year 31 40 47 7
10-year 52 40 47 7
30-year 14 10 14 4
Green Bonds - 0 4 4
Total Bonds 185 172 204 32
Total Gross Issuance 387 414 485 71
Share of Long Bonds to Total Bonds 36% 29% 30% +1%

Sources: Bank of Canada; Department of Finance Canada calculations.

Notes: Numbers may not add due to rounding. Issuance decision subject to factors such as availability of eligible expenditures and market conditions.

3 Domestic issuance does not include issuance in foreign currencies ($7 billion in 2023-24).

Projected Deficits

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. What explains the better-than-expected 2022-23 result relative to Budget 2023?

Overall, the economy remained stronger than expected and revenues were $10.6 billion higher than forecast. This was primarily due to higher tax revenues driven by higher-than-expected corporate income tax revenues.

Program expenses, excluding net actuarial losses, were $2.6 billion higher than expected, largely a result of higher-than-anticipated provisions for claims and contingent liabilities.

Public debt charges were $0.5 billion higher than projected resulting from higher-than-expected interest charges on unmatured debt due to higher-than-anticipated borrowing requirements toward the end of the fiscal year, offset in part by lower-than-expected interest expenses on future benefit obligations.

Net actuarial losses were $0.2 billion lower than projected.

2. What explains the deterioration in the budgetary balance from $35.3 billion in 2022-23 to $40 billion in 2023-24 as shown in the 2023 Fall Economic Statement?

The deficit is projected to rise $4.7 billion 2023-24 due to slow revenue growth and rising expenses this fiscal year. The weak expected revenue growth (up only 1.9 per cent) results from the slowdown in economic growth expected by private sector forecasters. Nominal GDP, the broadest measure of the tax base, is expected to grow by only 2 per cent in 2023 (versus 11 per cent in 2022).

Expenses in 2023-24 are expected to be higher than in 2022-23, due to higher major transfers to persons (in part because of the indexation of benefits to inflation), higher transfers to other levels of government (due to legislated arrangements and other agreements), and higher public debt charges resulting largely from the projected rise in interest rates.

3. Last year, the year-to-date deficit as of December was $5.5 billion and the government ended the year with a $35.3-billion deficit. This year, the government is already running a $23.6-billion deficit as of December, but has committed to a deficit no larger than $40 billion for the year. This does not seem likely.

Last year, the government incurred several large, anticipated expenses late in the year that are either not expected to be repeated this year, or are expected to be substantially lower. These expenses included the $2.7 billion Grocery Rebate, $2.0 billion Canada Health Transfer top-up, and those associated with Indigenous claims.

Realizing a $40-billion deficit will be challenging, but provided revenues maintain their current momentum, and the government controls spending, it is certainly achievable.

Disaster Assistance

Issue

Media have published stories comparing 2023-24 and 2024-25 Main Estimates for Public Safety, noting that while Canada has faced more emergencies related to weather and wildfires, the estimates call for a drop in spending for Public Safety by 46% from the $2.6 billion allocated last year to $1.6 billion in 2024-25. 

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. Why is the federal government providing less funding to provinces and territories for assistance related to natural disasters in 2024-25 than in 2023-24?

The federal government reimburses provinces and territories for up to 90% of response and recovery costs. Required funding fluctuates each year, depending on open disaster events and when provinces and territories submit their expenses. Payments do not necessarily happen the same year as the disaster occurred, as provinces and territories are reimbursed after the fact based on expenses they submit.

2. How much funding is the federal government expecting to provide for provinces and territories under the DFAA in the coming years?

As of December 31, 2023, Public Safety's outstanding liability for 72 active natural disasters where an Order in Council was approved but final payments have not been made, was $4.93 billion, the majority of which is expected to be paid out over the next five years.

The most significant events within this liability are as follows:

Background

When large-scale disasters occur, the federal government covers up to 90% of eligible response (e.g., evacuation supports) and recovery (repairs and reconstruction to infrastructure) expenses through the Disaster Financial Assistance Arrangements (DFAA). Since 1970, the Government of Canada has provided over $7.9 billion to provinces and territories through this program – 73% in the past ten years.  

Provinces and territories may make a request for assistance under the DFAA within six months after a natural disaster occurs. In response to the request, Public Safety would work on an Order in Council (OiC) that would officially declare the disaster to be of concern to the Government of Canada and authorize financial assistance.

Following approval of the OiC, advance, interim, and final DFAA payments are made at the request of the provinces and territories following a submission of expenditures. Normally, PTs have up to five years after OiC approval to request a final payment, but PTs can also request an extension if necessary.

Economic Growth Comparisons – G7

Issue

How Canada compares to its G7 peers on key macroeconomic metrics.

Key Points

Background

Table 4
G7 Employment Change Since February 2020
(per cent)
  Latest
Canada 6.1
France 5.0
Germany 3.5
Italy 3.0
U.S. 1.4
U.K. 0.7
Japan 0.0

Notes: Last data points are February 2024 (Canada, U.S.), January 2024 (Germany, Italy, Japan), 2023Q4 (U.K., France). Compares to the level of February 2020, except for France and the UK (2019Q4).

Source: Haver Analytics.

Table 5
G7 Headline CPI Inflation
(y/y, per cent)
  December January* February
U.K. 4.0 4.0 -- 
France 3.7 3.1 3.0
U.S. 3.4 3.1 3.2
Germany 3.7 2.9 2.5
Canada 3.4 2.9 2.8
Japan 2.6 2.1 --
Italy 0.6 0.8 0.8

*ranked by January

Table 6
G7 Real GDP Growth
  %, quarterly change at annual rate % change*
  23Q2 23Q3 23Q4 2019Q4 to 2020Q2 2019Q4 to 2023Q4
U.S. 2.1 4.9 3.2 -9.1 8.2
Canada 0.6 -0.5 1.0 -12.7 4.4
Italy -1.0 0.9 0.7 -17.2 4.2
Japan 4.2 -3.2 0.4 -7.3 3.1
France 2.5 0.0 0.2 -17.7 1.9
U.K. 0.0 -0.5 -1.4 -22.5 1.0
Germany 0.1 0.0 -1.1 -10.8 0.1

*Ranked by 19Q4 to 23Q4 growth

Table 7
G7 Real GDP per Capita Growth
  %, quarterly change at annual rate % change*
  23Q2 23Q3 23Q4 19Q4-23Q4
U.S. 1.6 4.2 2.6 6.7
Italy -0.7 1.0 0.7 5.5
Japan 4.2 -2.5 - 4.3
France 2.2 -0.4 -0.2 0.4
U.K. -0.5 - - -0.2
Germany -0.3 -0.4 -1.6 -1.7
Canada -1.8 -4.0 -3.2 -2.5

*Ranked by 19Q4 to 23Q4 growth. Data for Japan ends in 2023Q3 and for U.K. in 2023Q2. Constant US$, OECD PPP.

Table 8
G7 GDP per Capita Levels
2003 2022*
  Level ($US) Relative to US Level ($US) Relative to US
U.S. 39,418 100 77,176 100
Germany 30,322 77 66,500 86
Canada 32,393 82 62,160 81
France 28,217 72 57,160 74
U.K. 30,302 77 56,742 74
Italy 29,173 74 55,863 72
Japan - - 47,201 61

*Ranked by 2022 level. Current US$, OECD PPP.

Table 9
G7 Real GDP Growth (%) Forecasts by IMF
    Current Projection*
  2023 2024 2025
Canada 1.1 1.4 2.3
U.S. 2.5 2.1 1.7
France 0.8 1.0 1.7
U.K. 0.5 0.6 1.6
Germany -0.3 0.5 1.6
Italy 0.7 0.7 1.1
Japan 1.9 0.9 0.8

*Ranked by 2025 projection

IMF World Economic Outlook (January 2025)

Table 10
G7 Productivity Change 2019-22
(per cent)
  Latest
U.S. 4.3
Germany 2.3
U.K. 2.2
Canada 1.8
Japan 1.5
Italy 1.0
France -3.3

*Based on constant US$, OECD PPP.

Chart 1
Productivity Gap with US, G7, 2022
Chart 1: Productivity Gap with US, G7, 2022

*Based on constant US$, OECD PPP.

Text version
Country Gap with US
United States 0%
Germany -9%
France -14%
United Kingdom -20%
Italy -28%
Canada -29%
Japan -36%
Chart 2
Business-sector Productivity, Canada and US (2019 Q4 = 100)
Chart 2: Business-sector Productivity, Canada and US (2019 Q4 = 100)

*Based on constant dollars in respective currencies.

Text version
Quarter Canada US
2019 Q4 100 100
2020 Q1 105.0 99.9
2020 Q2 118.6 105.3
2020 Q3 106.8 106.3
2020 Q4 104.7 105.1
2021 Q1 103.5 105.8
2021 Q2 102.3 105.8
2021 Q3 101.5 105.2
2021 Q4 100.8 105.9
2022 Q1 101.8 104.3
2022 Q2 101.8 103.2
2022 Q3 101.7 103.2
2022 Q4 100.7 103.9
2023 Q1 100.0 103.8
2023 Q2 99.8 104.5
2023 Q3 99.2 105.7
2023 Q4 99.7 106.6

Excess Profit Tax on Large Grocery Companies

Issue

The NDP has proposed "an excess profit tax on large grocery companies that would put money back in the people's pocket with a GST rebate and establish a National School Food Program." The NDP has also indicated that the proposed tax would help to address inflation.

Key Points

Background

One of the government's first actions after taking office was to reduce the rate of the second personal income tax bracket from 22 per cent to 20.5 per cent, while introducing a new top bracket of 33 per cent for the wealthiest Canadians. The government also increased the amount of income middle-class Canadians can earn before paying tax (the basic personal amount) by almost $2,000.

In addition, the government has:

The government has also taken action through the tax system to support those who are the most affected by cost-of-living pressures driven by inflation, including through the introduction of one-time targeted payments such as the doubling the GST Credit for six months in the fall of 2022 and the Grocery Rebate in July 2023.

Through the federal pollution pricing system, the government is also putting a price on pollution while making life more affordable for families through the Canada Carbon Rebate.

Grocery Affordability

Issue

Federal initiatives in relation to grocery affordability.  

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. What are the government initiatives to support grocery affordability?  

Among other actions, to improve the competitive landscape in the grocery sector, and help stabilize the price of groceries, and other essentials, the government is: 

2. Will a grocery sector code of conduct increase food prices?

A code of conduct is an important part of a solution that will improve the strength and resilience of Canada's food supply chain.

While not directly affecting food prices, the code will improve predictability and transparency in supplier-retailer relations, which will ultimately benefit consumers.

3. To what extent are higher prices attributable to grocery chain profiteering?

After peaking at close to 11 per cent in early 2023, year-over-year inflation in grocery prices has eased to 3.4 per cent in January 2024.

Rising grocery prices has been driven by a combination of factors. Most notably external events, such as adverse weather events and geopolitical turmoil, have led to increased input costs.

A related, but less significant factor, is that margins have been increasing: profit margins for food retailers have doubled to more than 4 per cent in recent quarters, from roughly 2 per cent over the previous decade. The other parts of the food supply chain have not experienced this level of increase in their margins. This suggests that retailers have enjoyed more pricing power than farmers and food manufacturers over the recent period. However, the recent increase in margins accounts for less than 10 per cent of grocery price inflation. Therefore, higher margins do not appear to have been the main driver as compared to external events.  

Table 11
Government Initiatives to Support Grocery Affordability

Initiative

Existing Funding

Description

Grocery Rebate

$2.5 billion in targeted support

A one-time Grocery Rebate was delivered in July 2023 to 11 million low- and modest-income Canadians and families. It provided eligible couples with two children with up to an extra $467 and single Canadians without children with up to an extra $234, including single seniors.

The Office of Consumer Affairs Contributions Program for Non-Profit Consumer and Voluntary Organizations

Increase from $1.69 million to $5 million over five years

This increase in funding will allow the government to expand the scope of existing consumer projects to increase research in the retail sector, including groceries.

Zero cost initiatives

Grocery Code of Conduct

 

Ongoing efforts to establish a grocery code of conduct that will support fairness and transparency across the grocery industry

Grocery Task Force

 

A dedicated Grocery Task Force, that is supervising the big grocers' work to stabilize prices, as well as monitoring and investigating other practices in the grocery sector, such as "shrinkflation."

Competition Act Amendments – Bill C-56 (passed)

 

  • Giving more power to the Competition Bureau to crack down on unfair practices by large, dominant companies which drive up prices;
  • Removing the efficiencies defence, in order to end anti-competitive mergers that raise prices and limit choices for Canadian consumers; 
  • Empowering the Competition Bureau to block collaborations that stifle competition and consumer choice, particularly in situations where large grocers prevent smaller competitors from establishing operations nearby.

Competition Act Amendments – Bill C-59 (active Parliamentary consideration)

 

  • Further modernize merger reviews, including by empowering the Competition Bureau to better detect and address "killer acquisitions" and other anti-competitive mergers;
  • Enhance protections for consumers, workers, and the environment, including by prohibiting misleading "greenwashing" claims and improving the focus on worker impacts in competition analysis;
  • Empower the Commissioner of Competition to review a wider selection of anti-competitive collaborations and seek meaningful remedies to ensure that harmful conduct is not repeated; and,
  • Broaden the reach of the law by enabling more private parties to bring cases before the Competition Tribunal and receive payment if they are successful.

Recruitment of international grocers

 

The Minister of Industry, Innovation and Industry continues to engage with international grocers to spur more competition in the Canadian grocery space.

Food Price Data Hub

 

A public facing data hub that offers access to a centralized collection of information on food prices in Canada.

Housing Affordability and Immigration Growth

Issue

High home prices, rising rents, and elevated mortgage rates have caused a deterioration in housing affordability in Canada. Lack of supply and rapid population growth due to immigration remain key issues.  

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. Why is Infrastructure Canada, the department supporting the Minister of Housing during a housing crisis, seeing a nearly 15% decrease in their forecasted budgetary expenditures in 2024-25, with CMHC seeing only modest increases (+10%) relative to most other departments and agencies?

Infrastructure Canada's sunsetting resources are not related to housing programming.

CMHC's Housing Supply Challenge expires in 2024-25. The final of five challenges was launched in late 2023. 

The government continues to invest heavily in housing as noted below.

Background

2023 Fall Economic Statement

Other Recent Initiatives

Major Transfers to Provinces and Territories in 2024-25 Main Estimates

Issue

In 2024-25, major transfers to other levels of government will be $99.4 billion.

Key Points

Based on formulas set out in legislation, major transfers to provinces and territories will increase by $4.8 billion in 2025:

Anticipated Areas of Questioning

1. How was the envelope of the 2024-25 Canada Health Transfer (CHT) determined? 

2. What were the main drivers of the legislated growth in determining the 2024-25 major transfer payments?

3. What is the timeline for the renewal of Equalization?

4. What is the Equalization floor payment for 2024-25?

5. Will the government be initiating a review of the CST, as promised in Budget 2012?

Background

Major Transfers to Other Levels of Government in 2024-25:

Canada Health Transfer ($52.1 billion): The CHT is the largest federal transfer program, providing long-term, predictable funding for health care.

Canada Social Transfer (CST) ($16.9 billion): The CST is a federal transfer that is provided in support of social assistance and social services, post-secondary education, and programs for children.

Equalization ($25.3 billion): Equalization ensures that less prosperous provinces have sufficient revenue to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation.

Territorial Formula Financing (TFF) ($5.2 billion): TFF funding enables territorial governments to provide their residents with programs and services comparable to those provided in the rest of Canada.

Table 12
Major Transfers 2023-24 and 2024-25 (Entitlement Basis)
($ millions)
2023-24 NL PE NS NB QC ON MB SK AB BC NU NT YT Total
CHT 665 214 1,305 1,029 10,939 19,242 1,794 1,490 5,782 6,800 50 55 55 49,421
CST 221 71 434 342 3,634 6,392 596 495 1,921 2,259 17 18 18 16,416
Equalization 0 561 2,803 2,631 14,037 421 3,510 0 0 0 0 0 0 23,963
TFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,971 1,611 1,252 4,834
Total 886 847 4,541 4,002 28,610 26,054 5,900 1,985 7,703 9,058 2,038 1,685 1,326 94,634
2024-25 NL PE NS NB QC ON MB SK AB BC NU NT YT Total
CHT 688 228 1,379 1,085 11,455 20,289 1,889 1,565 6,164 7,172 52 57 58 52,081
CST 223 74 448 352 3,719 6,587 613 508 2,001 2,329 17 19 19 16,909
Equalization 218 610 3,284 2,897 13,316 576 4,352 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,253
TFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,109 1,699 1,350 5,159
Total 1,130 911 5,111 4,335 28,490 27,451 6,854 2,073 8,165 9,501 2,178 1,775 1,427 99,401
Change NL PE NS NB QC ON MB SK AB BC NU NT YT Total
CHT 23 14 74 56 516 1,047 95 75 382 373 1 2 3 2,660 (5.4%)
CST 3 3 14 11 85 195 17 13 81 70 0 0 0 492 (3.0%)
Equalization 218 48 481 266 -721 155 843 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,289 (5.4%)
TFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 89 98 325 (6.7%)
Total 244 65 569 333 -120 1,397 955 88 463 443 139 90 101 4,767 (5.0%)

CHT and CST 2023-24 represent the second estimation. CHT and CST 2024-25 represent the first estimation.

Totals may not add due to rounding.

1 2023-24 amounts for CHT and CST reflect the second estimate.

Excludes other fiscal arrangements: Statutory Subsisdies, Québec Abatement, Fiscal Stabilization, Nova Scotia Offset, CHT top-up, Transit and Housing, Safe return to Class, Safe Long-Term Care, Canada-wide ELCC, Home Care and Mental Health, Canada Cities and Communities Fund, Hibernia Dividend Backed Annuity Agreements with Newfoundland and Labrador, and Deduction/Reimbursements related to the Canada Health Act.

Mortgage Delinquencies

Issue

Equifax, a credit bureau, is reporting rising mortgage delinquency rates, particularly in Ontario and British Columbia.

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. How are mortgage borrowers coping with higher interest rates?

2. What is the government doing to support mortgage borrowers experiencing financial hardship?

Background

Table 13
Arrear Rates for Non-Mortgage Loans
per cent

 

2019Q4

2023Q4

Auto loans

0.48

0.64

Credit cards

0.87

0.91

Unsecured lines of credit

0.21

0.28

Price on Pollution and the Canada Carbon Rebate

Issue

The federal carbon pollution pricing system applies in all jurisdictions that request it or do not have their own pollution pricing systems which meets the federal benchmark. The federal government must return all direct proceeds from the federal pollution pricing system within the jurisdiction where they were collected. 

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. What does the federal carbon pollution pricing system cost households?

Table 14
Average Canada Carbon Rebate Net Benefit for 2024-25, annually per household
($)
2024-25 AB MB ON SK NB NS PEI NL
Average Cost Impacts per Household 1,056 828 869 1,156 536 609 628 859
Average CCR per Household 1,779 1,193 1,124 1,505 719 766 801 1,162
Average Net Benefit 723 365 255 349 183 157 173 303

Notes:
Estimates assume full pass-through from businesses to consumers, and may change as output-based standards (in particular, for fossil fuel-fired electricity) are adjusted. Estimates are calculated using internal proceeds forecasts, modelling from Finance, information from Statistics Canada, and modelling inputs from ECCC, assuming a coming-into-force date of April 1, 2024. The household impact estimates are not available beyond 2024-25 due to data and modelling limitations.

2. Is Saskatchewan paying the fuel charge on natural gas in 2024-25? Will Saskatchewan residents stop getting the Canada Carbon Rebate?

3. Why was the fuel charge temporarily removed only from heating oil and not also from all heating fuels, including natural gas or propane?

4. Why was the name changed from Climate Action Incentive payment to Canada Carbon Rebate, and what were the costs associated with the renaming?

5. What is the government of Canada doing with the proceeds that are not returned to households?

Table 15
SME amounts by province
  NL PEI NS NB ON MB SK AB Total
2019-20 n/a n/a n/a n/a 81.4 13.2 27.0 n/a 121.6
2020-21 n/a n/a n/a n/a 205.9 27.0 64.7 159.2 456.8
2021-22 n/a n/a n/a n/a 239.7 22.4 61.9 142.1 466.1
2022-23 n/a n/a n/a n/a 299.9 28.3 82.3 179.5 590
2023-24 20.1 4.4 28.5 17.1 509.3 53.0 64.7 237.4 934.5
2024-25 14.1 2.9 18.3 13.4 338.6 34.3 42 159.5 623.1
Total  34.2 7.3 46.8 30.5 1674.8 178.2 342.6 877.7 3192.1
Table 16
Indigenous amounts by province
  NL PEI NS NB ON MB SK AB Total
2020-21 n/a n/a n/a n/a 24.9 2.6 3.3 11.7 42.5
2021-22 n/a n/a n/a n/a 34.9 3.7 4.6 16.9 60.1
2022-23 n/a n/a n/a n/a 44.2 4.7 5.8 21 75.7
2023-24 2.2 0.49 3.2 1.9 56.6 5.9 7.2 26.4 103.89
2024-25 5.6 1.2 7.3 5.4 135.5 13.7 16.8 63.8 249.3
Total  7.8 1.69 10.5 7.3 296.1 30.6 37.7 139.8 531.5

Background

Canada Carbon Rebate (CCR)

Table 17
Annual Canada Carbon Rebate Amounts, 2024-25
AB SK MB ON NB NS PEI1 NL
Family of Four $1,800 $1,504 $1,200 $1,120 $760 $824 $880 $1,192
Rural2 $2,160 $1,804.80 $1,440 $1,344 $912 $988.80 $880 $1,430.40

1 Amounts for all provinces, except PEI, do not include the rural supplement. As all residents in PEI are considered to be living in a rural or small community, they are receiving the same CCR amount.

2 The rural amounts for 2024-25 reflect the proposed 20-per-cent rural supplement.

Heating Oil

Fuel Charge Rates

Proceeds of Crime, Money Laundering, and Terrorist Financing

I. Financial Crimes in Canada

Money laundering and terrorist financing are serious financial crimes that pose real threats to the safety of Canadians and the integrity of Canada's financial system.

Financial crime is not a victimless crime. It affects our society by supporting, rewarding, and perpetuating broader criminal and terrorist activities in Canada.

The complex efforts criminals employ to disguise the proceeds of crime make the scope of money laundering and terrorist financing in Canada difficult to estimate.  A 2021 report by the Criminal Intelligence Service of Canada estimated that between $45 billion and $113 billion Canadian dollars are laundered in Canada each year.

II. Canada's Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Regime

Canada maintains an extensive Regime to detect, deter, and disrupt financial crime. The Regime consists of 13 federal departments and agencies, each with their respective mandates, led by the Department of Finance. The Regime is established by federal statutes, including the PCMLTFA and the Criminal Code.  

The PCMLTFA is an essential component of Canada's Regime. The Act establishes the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (or 'FINTRAC') as Canada's anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing regulator and financial intelligence unit and defines its operations. It also requires financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions to report certain financial transactions to FINTRAC, have compliance and training programs in place, and identify clients and keep records.

Collectively, businesses subject to the PCMLTFA and its Regulations are known as 'reporting entities'. There are over 24,000 reporting entities that play a critical frontline role in efforts to prevent and detect money laundering and terrorist financing in Canada. Reporting entities currently include banks, credit unions, casinos, real estate professionals, money services businesses, accountants, dealers in precious metals and stones, and the armoured car sector.

Canada's Regime operates based on three interdependent pillars. The Department of Finance's role aligns with the first pillar: policy and coordination, prevention and detection and investigation and disruption. The Department is responsible for leading the assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing risks and developing and coordinating domestic and international policy. Other Regime partners also play an important role in informing and developing policy, including Public Safety, Justice, Global Affairs, and Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada.

III. Reviews of Canada's Regime

Canada's Regime has been the subject of a number of domestic and international reviews in recent years. These reviews found that Canada's Regime generally has a strong legal framework but achieving operational effectiveness remains a persistent challenge. Other criticisms of Canada's Regime include challenges in the ability to use financial intelligence, ensure transparency of legal persons and arrangements, successfully investigate and prosecute money laundering, and deprive criminals of the proceeds of crime.

The government acknowledges these important Reviews and is committed to bringing forward measures to strengthen Canada's Regime.

IV. Recent Government Actions to Strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Regime

The rapidly evolving and complex nature of financial crime requires ongoing changes to improve and modernize Canada's Regime. In recent years, the government has brought forward measures to provide tools to support law enforcement and investigations and prosecutions, enhance information sharing, and address risks posed by new technologies and sectors.

Since 2019, the government has made investments of $319.9 million, with $48.8 million ongoing, to strengthen data and information technology resources, financial intelligence, information sharing and investigative capacity to support money laundering investigations in Canada. Significant funding went to FINTRAC and the RCMP.

A public and searchable beneficial ownership registry of federal corporations was launched in January 2024. It will address the use of anonymous Canadian shell companies to conceal the true ownership of property, business, or other valuable assets with a view to laundering money, avoiding taxes, evading sanctions, or interfering with our democracy. The need for a beneficial ownership registry was a key finding of the FATF's Mutual Evaluation, Cullen Commission, and the 2018 Parliamentary Review of the PCMLTFA. The federal government will continue calling upon provincial and territorial governments to advance a national approach to beneficial ownership transparency.

Budget 2023 also announced a suite of legislative and regulatory measures to strengthen the investigative, enforcement, and information sharing tools of Canada's Regime. This includes changes to: enhance information sharing powers within the Finance portfolio and allow FINTRAC to better support decision making, including on national security risks; allow the Minister of Finance to direct reporting entities to undertake enhanced due diligence to help counter risks to the financial system, including from foreign interference; and require the financial sector to report information on sanctioned assets to FINTRAC.

Summer 2023 Public Consultation

In June 2023, the government launched a public Consultation on Strengthening the Regime. The government took a broad and comprehensive look at Canada's Regime and considered many potential measures for its improvement. This included: improving operational effectiveness and enforcement outcomes; facilitating greater information sharing; modernizing legislative and regulatory obligations while balancing burden on the private sector; and responding to national and economic security risks that have evolved in the two decades since the PCMLTFA was enacted, including those posed by Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine.

The government received 129 written submissions from a wide variety of stakeholders, which indicated strong support for further measures to strengthen Canada's Regime, to improve operational results. For example, submissions indicated:

Many suggestions were also made to strengthen and/or modernize criminal justice measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, such as proposals to reflect the use of new technologies and address third-party money laundering. Regarding sanctions evasion and threats to the security of Canada, most stakeholders agreed that FINTRAC should be enabled to provide intelligence on these matters, though some were concerned regarding the possible dilution of the PCMLTFA beyond its core focus on anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing.    

Finally, submissions indicated support for taking a risk-based approach to anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing regulation, including to the expansion of the framework to new entities, and many suggestions were also made to improve regulatory compliance and streamline administrative burden while maintaining the intelligence value of reporting to FINTRAC.

2024 Parliamentary Review of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act

Public Debt Charges

Issue

Public debt charges are rising along with interest rates.

Key Points

Background

Table 18
Public Debt Charge Forecasts
  2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029
Budget 2023 34.5 43.9 46.0 46.6 48.3 50.3
FES 2023 35.0 46.5 52.4 53.3 55.1 58.4 60.7
Difference 0.5 2.6 6.4 6.7 6.8 8.1
Table 19
Fall Economic Statement 2023 - Interest Rate and CPI forecasts
Per cent
  2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2023-
2027
3-month treasury bill rate
Budget 2023 4.4 3.3 2.6 2.4 2.4 --- 3.0
2023 Fall Economic Statement 4.8 4.3 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 3.5
10-year government bond rate
Budget 2023 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 --- 3.0
2023 Fall Economic Statement 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2
Consumer Price Index inflation
Budget 2023 3.5 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 --- 2.4
2023 Fall Economic Statement 3.8 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.5
Chart 3
Public Debt Charges (1990-91 to 2028-29) (Fall Economic Statement Forecast)
Chart 3: Public Debt Charges (1990-91 to 2028-29) (Fall Economic Statement Forecast)
Text version
Years GDP Forecast Historical
1981 368.4 4.1
1982 388.2 4.4
1983 421.3 4.8
1984 462.0 5.4
1985 500.0 5.5
1986 526.6 5.5
1987 574.3 5.4
1988 626.9 5.7
1989 671.6 6.1
1990 695.5 6.5
1991 701.8 6.3
1992 718.4 5.8
1993 747.0 5.4
1994 792.0 5.6
1995 831.6 5.9
1996 859.8 5.5
1997 906.9 4.8
1998 940.5 4.6
1999 1,007.9 4.3
2000 1,106.1 4.0
2001 1,144.5 3.5
2002 1,193.7 3.1
2003 1,254.7 2.9
2004 1,335.7 2.6
2005 1,421.6 2.4
2006 1,496.6 2.3
2007 1,577.7 2.1
2008 1,657.0 1.7
2009 1,571.3 1.7
2010 1,666.0 1.7
2011 1,774.1 1.6
2012 1,827.2 1.4
2013 1,902.2 1.3
2014 1,994.9 1.2
2015 1,990.4 1.1
2016 2,025.5 1.0
2017 2,140.6 1.0
2018 2,235.7 1.0
2019 2,313.6 1.1
2020 2,209.7 0.9
2021 2,509.6 1.0
2022 2,813.3 1.2  
2023 2,868.4 1.6  
2024 2,937.9 1.8  
2025 3,063.3 1.7  
2026 3,202.4 1.7  
2027 3,341.4 1.7  
2028 3,481.2 1.7  
Table 20
Reference Table: Fall Economic Statement 2023 Forecast
Fiscal
Year
PDC
($ billions)
% of GDP % of Revenue
1990-91 45.0 6.5 37.6
1991-92 43.9 6.3 34.8
1992-93 41.3 5.8 33.2
1993-94 40.1 5.4 32.4
1994-95 44.2 5.6 33.8
1995-96 49.4 5.9 35.2
1996-97 47.3 5.5 31.5
1997-98 43.1 4.8 26.8
1998-99 43.3 4.6 26.2
1999-00 43.4 4.3 24.6
2000-01 43.9 4.0 22.6
2001-02 39.7 3.5 21.6
2002-03 37.3 3.1 19.6
2003-04 35.8 2.9 17.8
2004-05 34.1 2.6 15.9
2005-06 33.8 2.4 15.1
2006-07 33.9 2.3 14.2
2007-08 33.3 2.1 13.6
2008-09 28.3 1.7 11.9
2009-10 26.6 1.7 12.0
2010-11 28.6 1.7 12.0
2011-12 29.0 1.6 11.8
2012-13 25.5 1.4 10.0
2013-14 24.7 1.3 9.2
2014-15 24.2 1.2 8.6
2015-16 21.8 1.1 7.5
2016-17 21.2 1.0 7.3
2017-18 21.9 1.0 7.0
2018-19 23.3 1.0 7.0
2019-20 24.4 1.1 7.3
2020-21 20.4 0.9 6.4
2021-22 24.5 1.0 5.9
2022-23 35.0 1.2 7.8
2023-24 46.5 1.6 10.2
2024-25 52.4 1.8 10.8
2025-26 53.3 1.7 10.6
2026-27 55.1 1.7 10.5
2027-28 58.4 1.7 10.6
2028-29 60.7 1.7 10.6

Source: Fiscal Reference Tables, Department of Finance Canada Calculations

RBC/HSBC Transaction

Issue

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. Did the Minister of Finance consider alleged mortgage fraud taking place at HSBC when making the decision to allow RBC to acquire HSBC?

Background

Alleged Mortgage Fraud at HSBC

Annex: RBC Commitments Related to Acquisition of HSBC

Budget 2023 Spending Reductions – RGS and RPAS

Issue

Refocusing Government Spending (RGS)

Budget 2023 identified $15.4 billion in savings over the next five years, starting in 2023-24, from Refocusing Government Spending (RGS). This was later expanded and extended in the Fall Economic Statement (FES) 2023, with additional savings of $0.3 billion in 2025-26, and $0.7 billion annually every year thereafter, for a total of $2.4 billion over the FES 2023 forecast horizon.

The President of the Treasury Board is overseeing the implementation of RGS in respect of appropriated entities. On November 9, 2023, the President tabled the Supplementary Estimates (B), 2023-24, which included details on $500 million in travel and professional services reductions by organization for 2023-24. These are the only reductions required for 2023-24.

The 2024–25 Main Estimates, which were tabled in Parliament on February 29, 2024, include an online annex outlining reductions related to RGS for all organizations subject to the exercise, for 2024-25, 2025-26 and 2026-27 and ongoing. Departments have also reported on their specific reduction plans in their 2024-25 Departmental Plans, tabled the same day (February 29).

The 2024-25 Main Estimates show refocused spending of $2.3 billion in 2024-25, $2.8 billion in 2025-26, and $3.6 billion in 2026-27 and ongoing. The disclosure notes that additional reductions to meet the Budget 2023 targets will be required ($0.3 billion in 2025-26 and $0.5 billion in 2026-27), which are communicated as an extension of the FES exercise (Responsible Government Spending).

Realigning Previously Announced Spending (RPAS)

Budget 2023 also announced savings of $6.4 billion over six years, starting in 2022-23, by "realigning previously announced spending". This was later expanded in FES 2023, with an additional $0.5 billion over six years. Realignments include instances where funds remained unallocated and were no longer required, or where the pace of implementation was slower than originally envisioned.

Budget 2023 and 2023 FES realignments with Estimates implications for 2023-24 have already been made public through the Frozen Allotments in Voted Authorities for Supplementary Estimates (C), 2023-24. Other years will be available in future Estimates documents, where applicable.

Key Points

Budget 2023 announced a Refocusing Government Spending measure to achieve savings of $15.4 billion over 5 years beginning in 2023-24, and $4.5 billion ongoing. This includes three areas:

When combined with the actions announced in the 2023 FES, the government will be saving $4.8 billion per year in 2026-27 and ongoing from public service efficiencies. The $4.8 billion figure referenced in FES text does not include the $450 million ongoing for Crowns as this is focused on the federal public service.

For the Budget 2023 exercise, Ministers, who know their organizations best, submitted assessments of where reductions could be implemented within their portfolio to the President of the Treasury Board. These proposals were considered by Treasury Board (TB), and information was provided through the 2024-25 Main Estimates on February 29, 2024. Departments have also reported on their specific reduction plans in their 2024-25 Departmental Plans, tabled the same day (February 29).

For the expansion of the Budget 2023 exercise, announced in FES 2023, and the remaining reallocations (reductions) from the Budget 2023 exercise, further details will be provided at a later date, as the reductions will only start in 2025-26.

In addition to the broad-based measures, Budget 2023 and FES 2023 announced that targeted realignments would be made to ensure that resources are allocated to their best possible purpose. This includes, for example, where program roll-out or take-up was slower than planned. Realignments with Estimates implications in 2023-2024 were included in Frozen Allotments in Voted Authorities for Supplementary Estimates C, 2023-24. Other years will be available in future Estimates documents, where applicable.

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. How are the reductions being implemented at enterprise Crown corporations and when will further information on reductions to these organizations be provided?

(Finance lead on questions) The government continues to work with enterprise Crown corporations so that they too do their part to refocus their spending by a comparable amount to departments and agencies and deliver annual savings of $450 million by 2026-27. Details on how Crown corporations are implementing reductions will be communicated in their corporate plan summaries.

Notably, the Business Development Bank of Canada, Export Development Canada, and the Canada Infrastructure Bank have released corporate plan summaries outlining how they plan to implement reductions.

2. FES 2023 announced that the government's additional savings targets will return the public service closer to its pre-pandemic growth track. What is this track? Will there be any reductions to the public service from the Budget 2023 or FES 2023 broad-based savings measures?

There will continue to be growth in the government. It is expected that routine attrition and internal redeployments will offer flexibility to manage possible reductions to employment.

Spending reductions introduced in the FES phase start in 2025-26. This was deliberate to give departments and agencies time for human resources planning.  

New initiatives, including those that were announced in Budget 2023 and the FES 2023, will provide opportunities for the redeployment of employees to deliver on priorities for Canadians.

Responsive on growth rates

With respect to the pre-pandemic growth track, for illustration, between 2015 and 2020, the compounded annual growth rate of the federal public service was 3.0 per cent. Between 2020 and 2023, this was closer to 6.0 per cent.

Departments are not funded for specific positions and can find efficiencies within their broader funding base.

3. How has the Department of Finance met its Refocusing Government Spending reduction commitments?

(Finance lead on questions) In meeting its reduction commitments, the Department of Finance is planning to reduce spending by $2.7 million in 2024-25, $3.9 million in 2025-26, and $5.4 million in 2026-27 and ongoing thereafter. The Department will achieve these reductions by:

4. How will the government address the difference between the savings announced in Budget 2023 and the reallocations identified in the 2024-25 Main Estimates?

As reported in the online annex (Refocusing Government Spending: Results for 2024–25, 2025–26, and 2026–27) included with the 2024-25 Main Estimates, $8.7 billion was refocused to date for that three-year period, representing over 90 percent of the $9.5 billion of savings announced in Budget 2023 for that same period. The balance of these Budget 2023 savings, $0.8 billion, will be reallocated in 2025-26 and 2026-27, through the Responsible Government Spending exercise announced in FES 2023.

Further details on both the remaining reallocations from the Budget 2023 exercise and the expanded reduction targets announced in FES 2023 will be provided at a later date, as these reductions will only start in 2025-26.

5. How is the government ensuring that the reallocations/reductions announced to date will not affect Canada's national defence commitments?

The reallocation targets are not a cap on organizations' spending. New initiatives, such as those in Budget 2023, FES 2023 and future budgets, will allow the government to continue to deliver on priorities for Canadians.

The government has made significant new investments in national defence, including investments under its 2017 defence policy, Strong, Secure, Engaged, as well as more recent commitments to modernize NORAD, invest in new capabilities for the Canadian Armed Forces, defend NATO allies, and support Ukraine.

As a result, the Department of National Defence's budget will more than double over ten years, from $18.6 billion in 2016-17 to $39.7 billion in 2026-27. This forecast takes into account DND's contribution to the Refocusing Government Spending exercise (which reaches $907.5 million annually by 2026-27). 

Background

Professional Services and Travel

For the reduction to spending on consulting, other professional services, and travel, TBS is overseeing reductions at the organizational level. Further information on the 2023-24 reduction, totalling $500 million, was communicated in Supplementary Estimates (B) 2023-24, which was released on November 9, 2023.

Refocusing Government Spending

In applying the 3 per cent reduction to eligible spending by government departments and agencies by 2026-27, departments were guided by the principles of not impacting: direct benefits and services to Canadians; direct transfers to other orders of government and Indigenous communities; and the Canadian Armed Forces. Agents of Parliament and small organizations were excluded from this exercise.

Departments and agencies only reviewed discretionary spending. Spending associated with legal or quasi-legal obligation to pay was not considered. For example, statutory spending and other payments that the government is obligated to make were removed from the eligible review base. Reductions when fully phased in are roughly 3 per cent, and will result in $2.4 billion in ongoing savings.

The reduction to departmental budgets will be implemented by TBS in collaboration with federal departments and agencies. Ministers and organizations' deputy heads, who know their organizations best, have identified the reductions. Each department was directed to look across their budget to see where savings could be found (*redacted*). Ministers submitted proposals to the President of the Treasury Board in fall 2023, for consideration by Treasury Board. Further information is communicated in the 2024-25 Main Estimates, released on February 29, 2024.

The government met 97 per cent of its reallocation targets for 2024-25 and 88 per cent of its ongoing Budget 2023 targets. The remaining reallocation target to be identified in 2024-25 has been shifted to 2025-26 and 2026-27.

Impact of reallocations announced to date on Indigenous communities and services to Canadians

To achieve the government's fiscal objectives, organizations were asked to look at programming and operations to identify duplication, lower value for money or misalignment with government priorities.

Departments carefully applied reallocations to not impact services to Canadians. Ministers had the opportunity to identify reallocations from across their portfolio to provide flexibility to identify proposals that made the most operational sense and ensure that important services to Canadians and other priority areas were not affected by the exercise.

The Parliamentary Budget Office's (PBO) February 2024 Report on Refocusing Government Spending in 2023-24 showed that almost all organizations (64 organizations, or 94 per cent) reported no reductions to service levels as a result of the spending reallocations. The PBO sent information requests to the 68 impacted organizations seeking a breakdown of the planned savings in 2023-24 by program and type (professional services or travel), with information on planned personnel reductions and service-level impacts (if any).

Crown Corporation Spending Reductions

The government is working with enterprise Crown corporations so that they too do their part to refocus their spending by a comparable amount to departments and agencies. Results will be communicated in corporate plan summaries by affected Crown corporations.

Targeted Funding Reductions - Realigning Previously Announced Spending (Budget 2023) and Responsible Investments to Meet the Current Needs of Canadians (FES 2023)

Through adjustments to previously announced spending, Budget 2023 and FES 2023 further the government's commitment to responsibly manage Canadians' tax dollars and helps to ensure that resources remain allocated to their best possible purpose.

For example, if a program is taking longer to stand up than originally anticipated (e.g., because of unforeseen delays), delaying funding to meet the pace of implementation means that resources in the near-term can be directed toward other priorities. Similarly, if demand is lower than expected, funding that is no longer needed can instead be put towards programs that are more important to Canadians.

Budget 2023 and 2023 FES realignments with Estimates implications for 2023-24 have already been made public through the Frozen Allotments in Voted Authorities for Supplementary Estimates (C), 2023-24. Other years will be available in future Estimates documents, where applicable.

Indigenous Engagement on Trans Mountain

Issue

The Government of Canada acquired the Trans Mountain pipeline in August 2018 and remains committed to finding ways for Indigenous groups to share in the economic benefits of Trans Mountain.

A $20M Indigenous Participant Funding program was developed to support discussions regarding Indigenous economic participation in Trans Mountain, with $12M of that envelope set aside in 2024-25.

Key Points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. What are the specific details of the investment opportunity being presented to Indigenous groups?

I am unable to provide specific details of the offer or the assessed worth of Trans Mountain at this time. I can tell you that Canada's approach is guided by three key principles: 

  1. Canada will provide Indigenous communities with access to capital, eliminating the need for them to use their own funds to participate. 
  2. Indigenous ownership will be established through an equity interest collectively held in a special purpose vehicle, enabling participating Indigenous groups to jointly exercise governance rights in Trans Mountain. 
  3. This equity interest will result in cash flows to the participating communities through the special purpose vehicle. 

2. When will Canada present the investment opportunity to Indigenous groups?

There are no specific timelines for presenting the offer.  

Background

Background – Indigenous Economic Participation in Trans Mountain

Since 2019, the Department of Finance has been leading a multi-step engagement process with eligible Indigenous groups regarding potential opportunities for Indigenous economic participation in Trans Mountain.

The latest step of this engagement was launched last year when the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance issued letters to each of the eligible Indigenous groups on August 2, 2023, confirming the Government of Canada's approach to providing Indigenous communities an opportunity to share in the economic benefits of Trans Mountain through acquisition of an ownership position.

Since the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance's letter in August 2023, all engagement with eligible Indigenous groups has been led by the Special Representative for the Deputy Prime Minister who has been appointed to lead all engagement with eligible Indigenous groups related to this opportunity. In September 2023, a meeting was held with eligible Indigenous groups in Vancouver, BC to discuss the process and next steps regarding the opportunity for Indigenous economic participation in Trans Mountain.

In January 2024, the Indigenous Participant Funding Program (PFP) as a proactive measure to ensure that eligible Indigenous groups have the support needed to make a fully informed decision on economic participation in Trans Mountain.

Under the PFP, Indigenous groups are able to apply for up to $100,000 in contribution funding for eligible activities undertaken between August 2, 2023 and March 31, 2025. Examples of eligible expenditures include: travel, professional fees, salaries and wages, community engagement, rental of office space and meeting rooms, and equipment (e.g., personal computers).

Background – Trans Mountain Corporation

The Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP) is over 98 per cent complete, with around 3.4 km of pipeline remaining to be built.

Trans Mountain Corporation (TMC) encountered technical issues in late January 2024 at a section called Mountain 3, which required additional time to determine the safest and most prudent actions for minimizing further delay. The company continues to work toward an anticipated in-service date in the second quarter of 2024.

The federal government acquired TMC and TMEP in 2018 as a strategic investment in the national interest to protect Canadian sovereignty and economic resilience.

On March 10, 2023, TMC publicly announced a revised cost estimate of $30.9 billion.

As indicated in the latest public filings with the Canada Energy Regulator, TMC now anticipates that the project's final costs will be approximately 10 per cent higher than the $30.9 billion cost estimate.

TMEP will benefit producers by providing egress capacity at a time when production is expected to continue to outpace capacity on existing pipelines. It will provide safer, more efficient, and more economic shipment of oil from Alberta to BC, versus tanker truck or railcar alternatives.

Following the completion of TMEP, the company expects to generate earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization ("EBITDA") of more than $2.4 billion per year, rising gradually thereafter.

The federal government does not intend to be the long-term owner of the project and a divestment process will be launched in due course.

Page details

2024-07-19