Federal environmental quality guidelines - Rare earth elements: cerium, lanthanum, neodynium and yttrium
Official title: Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 - Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines - Rare Earth Elements: Cerium, Lanthanum, Neodymium and Yttrium
Environment and Climate Change Canada
May 2026
Introduction
Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines (FEQGs) are recommended chemical thresholds to support federal priorities and programs. They can be developed for a variety of environmental media and can be grouped into preventative or remedial guidelines. Preventative FEQGs, often developed for water, biological tissue and sediment, provide thresholds of acceptable quality of the ambient environment. Remedial FEQGs, often developed for soil and groundwater, are remediation values protective of ecological functions used to assess and help manage contaminants at contaminated sites. Irrespective of which media they represent, FEQGs are based on the toxicological effects, that is, the hazards of specific substances or groups of substances.
FEQGs can serve a number of functions. They can:
- be an aid to prevent pollution by providing targets for acceptable environmental quality
- assist in evaluating the significance of concentrations of chemical substances currently found in the environment (that is, monitoring)
- serve as thresholds for the remediation of contaminated sites; and
- serve as performance measures of the success of risk management activities
The development of FEQGs is the responsibility of the federal Minister of the Environment under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA) (GC 1999). The intent is to develop FEQGs as an adjunct to the risk assessment/risk management of priority chemicals identified in the Chemicals Management Plan (CMP) or other federal initiatives. The use of FEQGs is voluntary unless prescribed in permits or other regulatory tools.
Where data permit, FEQGs are derived following Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) guideline derivation protocols. FEQGs are developed where there is a federal need for a new or updated guideline, but where CCME guidelines for the substance have not yet been developed or are not reasonably expected to be updated in the near future. More information on FEQGs is available at Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines (FEQG).
This factsheet describes FEQGs for the rare earth elements (REEs) of cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium in fresh water and sediment (Table 1). There are no existing FEQGs or CCME guidelines for these elements. The FEQGs for water follow CCME methods and meet CCME minimum data requirements for Type A or Type B2 approaches (CCME 2007) (see Federal Water Quality Guidelines section for details). Marine water quality guidelines were considered; however, sufficient data were not available to meet CCME minimum data requirements (see Marine exposure section). The FEQGs for sediment followed CCME protocol (CCME 1995) to the fullest extent possible; however, they did not strictly meet minimum data requirements in terms of the number of available studies. Cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium were selected for guideline development because they have sufficient toxicity data available, were identified as priorities for information gathering under the CMP and are on Canada’s critical minerals list. Environmental quality guidelines for REEs are needed for environmental impact assessment and successful development of an environmentally sustainable REE industry in Canada.
| Element | Short-term freshwater benchmark (µg/L) | Long-term freshwater guideline (µg/L) | Sediment freshwater guidelinec (mg/kg dw) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cerium | 81 (total)d | 1.6 (dissolved)e | 25 |
| Lanthanum | 160 (total)d | 2.4 (dissolved)e | 27 |
| Neodymium | 23 (dissolved)e | 1.1 (dissolved)e | 29 |
| Yttrium | 22 (dissolved)e | 1.9 (dissolved)e | 24 |
a These guidelines are not applicable to nanoparticles.
b Final guideline values are rounded to two significant figures.
c Normalized to 1% organic carbon (OC). Monitoring data should be normalized to 1% OC to assess whether the guideline value is exceeded.
d Applies to total concentration of the substance.
e Applies to dissolved concentration of the substance.
Substance identity
Lanthanides are a group of 15 consecutive elements on the periodic table from lanthanum to lutetium. They are chemically similar, and along with scandium and yttrium, they constitute the group of REEs (González et al. 2014). REEs are generally soft, malleable and ductile (NRCan 2016). They are generally good conductors and may have unique magnetic properties (NRCan 2016). Among REEs, cerium and lanthanum are the most abundant. FEQGs were derived for cerium (Ce; molar mass 140.116 g/mol; Chemical Abstracts Service registry number (CAS RN) 7440-45-1), lanthanum (La; molar mass 138.905 g/mol; CAS RN 7439-91-0), neodymium (Nd; molar mass 144.24 g/mol; CAS RN 7440-00-8), and yttrium (Y; molar mass 88.905 g/mol; CAS RN 7440-65-5) (PubChem 2024) based on data availability and identified priorities.
REEs co-occur in many of the same mineral deposits (GC 2014). The term “rare” does not refer to the relative abundance of REEs in the Earth’s crust, but rather to the fact that REEs do not concentrate in pure ore deposits as do other elements (González et al. 2014). REEs rarely occur in concentrations that are sufficiently enriched to be economically exploitable; rather, they are found together with other elements and are difficult to separate for extraction (GC 2014). Based on their atomic numbers, REEs are divided into light (lanthanum through gadolinium) and heavy (terbium through lutetium) categories (Gosen et al. 2014; NRCan 2016). The ionic radius of each element decreases from light REEs (LREEs) to heavy REEs (HREEs) (Wells and Wells 2012).
The most common mineral deposits whereby REEs are found include monazite, bastnasite and xenotime (NRCan 2016). They are strongly attracted to both oxygen and phosphate (Brown et al. 1990 as reported in NRCan 2016) and are generally found in compounds as trivalent cations in oxides, phosphates, carbonates and silicates (Hedrick 2002).
Sources and uses
REEs have become essential in high-tech and green technologies, and their increasing anthropogenic use has led to REE releases and detection in all environmental media. However, their potential impacts on ecosystems are poorly understood (Lachaux et al. 2022b). REEs do not occur in concentrated deposits, therefore large quantities (>90%) of excess and unused material are generated while mining for REEs (Reisman et al. 2013).
REEs have received significant attention in recent years because of the increasing demand for these elements as well as geopolitical concerns. China is the largest producer of REEs, accounting for 70% of annual global production while most of the remaining production is from United States (14%), Australia (6%), Myanmar (4%), and Thailand (2%) (NRCan 2024). China produced an estimated 210,000 tonnes (t) in 2022, while the production for the rest of the world was 91,000 t (NRCan 2024). Canada has some of the largest known global reserves of REEs, estimated at over 15 million t of rare earth oxides in 2023 (NRCan 2024). The first demonstration project for REE mining in Canada commenced in June 2021 at the Nechalacho mine near Yellowknife and there are a number of advanced exploration projects in Canada. Many of these projects are in northern Quebec, the Northwest Territories and Ontario’s Ring of Fire region.
REEs were historically used for fluid cracking catalysts and in glass polishing; however, they have now become critical to Canadian and global economies for their essential use in new and green technologies (NRCan 2016). Due to their unique characteristics, there are no easy substitutes for them in most applications (GC 2014). Examples of technology requiring REEs include hybrid vehicles, wind turbines, rechargeable batteries, mobile phones, computers, liquid-crystal display (LCD) screens, radar systems and catalytic converters (NRCan 2016). Some specific uses of lanthanum are in carbon lighting applications (studio and projection lighting), optical glass, camera lenses, nodular cast iron, ceramics, electronic applications, microwave crystals, metal alloys, high-temperature furnaces, magnetic cooling and as a catalyst in petroleum refining (NRCan 2016). Lanthanum is also a component of Phoslock, a lanthanum-modified clay that has been used in Canada to manage cyanobacterial blooms in lakes (Nürnberg 2017). Additionally, cerium and lanthanum are components of mischmetal alloy, used for example in ‘flints’ of cigarette lighters, as well as in glass polishing and in fuel cell technology. Other specific uses of cerium include in carbon arc lighting, metallurgical and nuclear applications, mildew-proofing, incandescent gas mantles, self-cleaning ovens, photoelectric cells, medical applications, and as a catalyst in petroleum refining (NRCan 2016). The main use of neodymium is in permanent magnets for hybrid vehicles and generators in wind turbines, and in magnets used in medical devices and disk drives. Neodymium is also used in mischmetal, didymium glass, colourants for glass and enamels, astronomical work, magnets for toys and some handheld devices, electronics, petroleum refining and rubber catalyst applications (NRCan 2016). Yttrium, cerium and lanthanum are used in the phosphors in fluorescent lights (Tan et al. 2015) and as colouring and decolouring agents in glass (De Lima 2016). Yttrium is also used in microwave filters, acoustic sound, synthetic diamond, laser systems, medical uses, glass and ceramic industry, stainless steel production and fuel cell technology (NRCan 2016).
Ambient concentrations
The National Guidelines and Standards Office of Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) compiled the water quality monitoring datasets for cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium from provinces and territories as well as data from unpublished research. Total and dissolved concentrations were available from the National Long-term Water Quality Monitoring (NLTWQM) database (ECCC 2022), the BC Environmental Monitoring System (Government of British Columbia 2022), the Ontario Geological Survey (Handley and Dyer 2022), and the Banque de données sur la qualité du milieu aquatique (BQMA) (MELCC 2022). Cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium concentrations in surface waters of Canada available up to December 2021 are summarised in Table 2a-d. It is to be noted that the concentrations summarized here are for broader guidance because of the inherent variability among the monitoring programs.
When concentrations in surface water were grouped according to province, the median concentrations ranged from 0.009 to 0.20 (dissolved) and 0.023 to 3.05 (total) µg/L for cerium; 0.01 to 0.35 (dissolved) and 0.06 to 1.29 (total) µg/L for lanthanum; and 0.03 to 0.096 (dissolved) and 0.08 to 1.07 (total) µg/L for yttrium. Across all sites in Canada (Table 2a-b), the minimum and maximum concentrations for cerium were 0.001 and 44.5 (dissolved, n=5,653) and 0.001 and 182 (total, n=17,775), while for lanthanum these values were 0.001 and 21.6 (dissolved, n=8,311) and 0.001 and 79 (total, n=24,654). For yttrium, minimum and maximum values were 0.001 and 40 (dissolved, n=6,073) and 0.001 and 90 (total, n=17,957) (Table 2d).
Neodymium monitoring data were only available from Quebec and Ontario (Table 2c). Ontario data were exclusively from the McFaulds Lake region, also known as the “Ring of Fire”. In Quebec, dissolved concentrations ranged from 0.009 to 0.92 μg/L with a median of 0.2 μg/L, whereas total concentrations ranged from 0.007 to 7.7 μg/L with a median value of 0.67 μg/L. In Ontario, dissolved concentrations were not available, but total concentrations ranged from 0.002 to 0.077 μg/L with a median concentration of 0.013 μg/L.
The data from Table 2a-d show that median dissolved concentrations are 2 to 42 times lower than total concentrations (average of 9.6). Therefore, these data demonstrate that un-dissolved or particulate forms of these REEs are on average ten times higher in concentration than dissolved forms.
| Location | Years | Sites (Samples)a | Mediana | Mina | Maxa | Sites (Samples)b | Medianb | Minb | Maxb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB | 2002 to 2019 | 16 (762) | 0.041 | 0.001 | 2.35 | 16 (781) | 0.584 | 0.001 | 104 |
| BC | 2001 to 2021 | 23 (2,563) | 0.009 | 0.001 | 4.49 | 49 (10,747) | 0.090 | 0.001 | 49.6 |
| MB | 2014 to 2019 | 4 (378) | 0.073 | 0.011 | 3.45 | 4 (377) | 3.050 | 0.094 | 32.3 |
| NL | 2003 to 2019 | N/A (N/A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 74 (1,429) | 0.353 | 0.001 | 11.6 |
| NT | 2002 to 2019 | 30 (1,098) | 0.038 | 0.001 | 44.50 | 30 (1,260) | 0.265 | 0.001 | 182 |
| ON | 2011 to 2013 | N/A (N/A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,323 (1,323) | 0.023 | 0.002 | 0.32 |
| SK | 2014 to 2019 | 7 (337) | 0.034 | 0.001 | 1.14 | 7 (337) | 0.513 | 0.001 | 25.4 |
| YT | 2002 to 2019 | 1 (28) | 0.023 | 0.005 | 0.32 | 11 (1,041) | 0.118 | 0.002 | 22.8 |
| QC | 2016 to 2019 | 177 (487) | 0.204 | 0.007 | 1.07 | 116 (480) | 0.884 | 0.003 | 19.0 |
Data for Alberta, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Northwest Territories, Saskatchewan and Yukon are from the National Long Term Water Quality Monitoring database (NLTWQM) (ECCC 2022).
Data for British Columbia are from the BC Environmental Monitoring System (BC EMS) (Government of British Columbia 2022).
Data for Ontario are from the Ontario Geological Survey on behalf of Ontario Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines (Handley and Dyer 2022).
Data for Quebec are aggregated from Banque de données sur la Qualité du Milieu Aquatique (BQMA) (MELCC 2022) and unpublished river data provided by Dr. Marc Amyot, University of Montreal, personal communication.
Province and territory names have been abbreviated to their two-letter form.
a Dissolved (µg/L)
b Total (µg/L)
N/A – not available
| Location | Years | Sites (Samples)a | Mediana | Mina | Maxa | Sites (Samples)b | Medianb | Minb | Maxb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB | 2002 to 2019 | 16 (2,133) | 0.012 | 0.001 | 2.12 | 16 (2,134) | 0.119 | 0.002 | 67.5 |
| BC | 2000 to 2022 | 33 (2,651) | 0.010 | 0.001 | 2.09 | 70 (12,037) | 0.060 | 0.001 | 20.0 |
| MB | 2003 to 2019 | 4 (890) | 0.038 | 0.006 | 1.72 | 4 (891) | 1.290 | 0.008 | 30.6 |
| NL | 2003 to 2019 | N/A (N/A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 74 (4,260) | 0.216 | 0.001 | 20.0 |
| NS | 2017 to 2019 | N/A (N/A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 21 (44) | 0.070 | 0.030 | 0.44 |
| NT | 2002 to 2019 | 30 (1,098) | 0.033 | 0.001 | 21.60 | 30 (1,325) | 0.143 | 0.001 | 79.0 |
| ON | 2011 to 2013 | N/A (N/A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,323 (1,323) | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.19 |
| SK | 2003 to 2019 | 7 (1,025) | 0.018 | 0.001 | 1.70 | 7 (1,029) | 0.232 | 0.001 | 19.5 |
| YT | 2000 to 2019 | 1 (28) | 0.023 | 0.005 | 0.32 | 11 (1,457) | 0.076 | 0.003 | 11.6 |
| QC | 2016 to 2019 | 177 (486) | 0.353 | 0.011 | 2.130 | 18 (154) | 1.274 | 0.006 | 11.0 |
Data for Alberta, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Northwest Territories, Saskatchewan and Yukon are from the National Long Term Water Quality Monitoring database (NLTWQM) (ECCC 2022).
Data for British Columbia are from the BC Environmental Monitoring System (BC EMS) (Government of British Columbia 2022).
Data for Ontario are from the Ontario Geological Survey on behalf of Ontario Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines (Handley and Dyer 2022).
Data for Quebec are aggregated from Banque de données sur la Qualité du Milieu Aquatique (BQMA) (MELCC 2022) and unpublished river data provided by Dr. Marc Amyot, University of Montreal, personal communication.
Province and territory names have been abbreviated to their two-letter form.
a Dissolved (µg/L)
b Total (µg/L)
N/A – not available
| Location | Years | Sites (Samples)a | Mediana | Mina | Maxa | Sites (Samples)b | Medianb | Minb | Maxb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ON | 2011 to 2013 | N/A (N/A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,323 (1,323) | 0.013 | 0.002 | 0.077 |
| QC | 2016 to 2019 | 177 (486) | 0.200 | 0.009 | 0.924 | 18 (154) | 0.671 | 0.007 | 7.70 |
Data for Ontario are from the Ontario Geological Survey on behalf of Ontario Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines (Handley and Dyer 2022).
Data for Quebec are aggregated from Banque de données sur la Qualité du Milieu Aquatique (BQMA) (MELCC 2022) and unpublished river data provided by Dr. Marc Amyot, University of Montreal, personal communication.
Province and territory names have been abbreviated to their two-letter form.
a Dissolved (µg/L)
b Total (µg/L)
N/A – not available
| Location | Years | Sites (Samples)a | Mediana | Mina | Maxa | Sites (Samples)b | Medianb | Minb | Maxb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB | 2002 to 2019 | 16 (761) | 0.049 | 0.001 | 1.03 | 16 (785) | 0.280 | 0.009 | 48.5 |
| BC | 2004 to 2022 | 45 (2,985) | 0.030 | 0.001 | 40 | 84 (11,190) | 0.086 | 0.001 | 90.0 |
| MB | 2014 to 2019 | 4 (378) | 0.071 | 0.024 | 1.31 | 4 (377) | 1.070 | 0.061 | 12.4 |
| NL | 2014 to 2019 | N/A (N/A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 74 (1,420) | 0.181 | 0.022 | 3.41 |
| NT | 2002 to 2019 | 30 (1,098) | 0.044 | 0.001 | 9.30 | 30 (1,325) | 0.172 | 0.004 | 64.8 |
| ON | 2011 to 2013 | N/A (N/A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,323 (1,323) | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.06 |
| SK | 2014 to 2019 | 7 (337) | 0.057 | 0.003 | 0.34 | 7 (337) | 0.242 | 0.003 | 10.1 |
| YT | 2002 to 2019 | 1 (28) | 0.042 | 0.019 | 0.17 | 11 (1,046) | 0.089 | 0.006 | 17.0 |
| QC | 2016 to 2019 | 177 (486) | 0.096 | 0.010 | 0.419 | 18 (154) | 0.295 | 0.009 | 3.00 |
Data for Alberta, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Northwest Territories, Saskatchewan and Yukon are from the National Long Term Water Quality Monitoring database (NLTWQM) (ECCC 2022).
Data for British Columbia are from the BC Environmental Monitoring System (BC EMS) (Government of British Columbia 2022).
Data for Ontario are from the Ontario Geological Survey on behalf of Ontario Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines (Handley and Dyer 2022).
Data for Quebec are aggregated from Banque de données sur la Qualité du Milieu Aquatique (BQMA) (MELCC 2022) and unpublished river data provided by Dr. Marc Amyot, University of Montreal, personal communication.
Province and territory names have been abbreviated to their two-letter form.
a Dissolved (µg/L)
b Total (µg/L)
N/A – not available
MacMillan et al. (2019) reported large regional variations in REE concentrations in surface waters (>200-fold) and lake sediments (10-fold), largely due to differences in bedrock geology and environmental conditions. REE concentrations in surface water increased with increasing sediment concentrations and decreased with lake depth, suggesting that REE mobilization from sediments was a source to the water column (MacMillan et al. 2019).
MacMillan et al. (2019) reported sum concentrations of lanthanides and yttrium in lake sediments from various ecosystems in eastern Canada. Sampled lakes were located in regions where no REE mining or exploitation had occurred and thus were considered uncontaminated. Sum concentrations ranged from 141.1 to 463.5 μg/g dw in subarctic lakes, 90.2 to 352.1 μg/g dw in arctic tundra lakes, 41.7 to 92.2 μg/g dw in polar desert lakes and 72.5 to 281.4 μg/g dw in temperate lakes. Concentrations of yttrium alone ranged from 9.1 to 30.5 μg/g dw in subarctic lakes, 8.6 to 47.4 μg/g dw in arctic tundra lakes, 5.5 to 11.0 μg/g dw in polar desert lakes, and 12.2 to 29.8 μg/g dw in temperate lakes (concentrations of other individual REEs not reported) (MacMillan et al. 2019). Marginson et al. (2023) examined sediment concentrations in undisturbed arctic environments and found mean concentrations of ∑REEs of 716.29 nmol/g dw, and a range of 161.8 to 1126 nmol/g dw. These findings were similar to other studies conducted in remote, undisturbed locations (Amyot et al. 2017; MacMillan et al. 2019). ∑REE concentrations in sediment sampled from Northern Quebec in an undisturbed and REE-rich geological area ranged from 71.3 to 184.9 µg/g dw (Romero-Freire et al. 2018), which is comparable to the 22.2 to 155 µg/g dw range observed in Nunavik, Quebec (Marginson et al. 2023).
REE concentrations in deep (>15 cm depth) and shallow (<15 cm depth) lake sediments (sieved before analysis), sampled in Ontario between 2011 and 2013, are summarized in Table 3. The median cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium concentrations in shallow sediments were 9.45, 4.78, 4.22 and 2.11 µg/g dw, respectively, whereas median concentrations in deep lake sediment were higher: 17 μg/g dw for cerium, 8 μg/g dw for lanthanum, 5.28 μg/g dw for neodymium and 2.62 μg/g dw for yttrium.
| Element | Sediment Depth | Sites/Samples | Median (μg/g dw) | Min (μg/g dw) | Max (μg/g dw) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cerium | Shallow | 1,304 | 9.45 | 0.95 | 59.6 |
| Cerium | Deep | 1,274 | 17.00 | 1.50 | 110 |
| Lanthanum | Shallow | 1,304 | 4.78 | 0.40 | 26.3 |
| Lanthanum | Deep | 1,274 | 8.00 | 0.50 | 51.0 |
| Neodymium | Shallow | 1,304 | 4.22 | 0.61 | 22.8 |
| Neodymium | Deep | 1,274 | 5.28 | 0.30 | 38.0 |
| Yttrium | Shallow | 1,304 | 2.11 | 0.39 | 9.68 |
| Yttrium | Deep | 1,274 | 2.62 | 0.36 | 21.3 |
Data are from the Ontario Geological Survey on behalf of Ontario Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines (Handley and Dyer 2022).
Mode of action
Joonas et al. (2017) stated that while information on mode of action for individual REEs may be limited for some elements, REEs are a physicochemically homogenous group and their modes of toxic action appear to be similar. REEs induce toxicity through oxidative stress, creating reactive oxygen species, damage to cells, and alterations to metabolic pathways and redox balance (Banaee et al. 2025). Sneller et al. (2000) broadly summarized mechanisms of toxic action for REEs in general, including: (i) competition between calcium/magnesium and lanthanum, causing disruption of bone integrity and cellular signalling; (ii) replacement of calcium/magnesium; (iii) reaction with proteins where calcium/magnesium are not typically involved; (iv) substitution of other elements; (v) lipid-peroxidation caused by redox cycling of REE which can exist in multiple oxidation states; and (vi) phosphate deficiency caused by precipitation of phosphate-REE. These mechanisms summarized by Sneller et al. (2000) were observed for various REEs in various organisms (both aquatic and terrestrial), including micro-organisms, nematodes, crustaceans, insects, mammals and plants.
Some specific information was available regarding mode of action for individual REEs, in particular for lanthanum. The ionic radius of lanthanum is similar to that of calcium (Ca2+), which may cause displacement or replacement of calcium in various cell functions (Das et al. 1988; Barry and Meehan 2000; Gonzalez et al. 2014; Egler et al. 2023). Lanthanum can react with tissue components and compete for active binding sites, which may result in interactions with calcium-dependent biological systems and cause toxicity or impaired function (Das et al. 1988; Barry and Meehan 2000; Egler et al. 2023). Ionic forms of lanthanum and yttrium (La3+ and Y3+) have been identified as potential inhibitors of calcium (Ca) transporters using in-vitro preparations of rat liver mitochondria (Korotkov et al. 2014). Interaction with mitochondria explained the toxicity of yttrium to Daphnia magna, Chironomus riparius and Oncorhynchus mykiss and revealed a wide range of subcellular handling strategies (Cardon et al. 2019). In algal tests with lanthanum, the formation of insoluble phosphate may have lowered the availability of free phosphorus and caused adverse effects from starvation rather than toxicity of lanthanum (Gonzalez et al. 2015). Similarly, a connection between algal growth inhibition and phosphate removal from the test medium was found by Joonas et al. (2017) in experiments with lanthanum and cerium.
The uptake of REEs in aquatic organisms can be via absorption from water or from ingestion of contaminated food. Regarding uptake from the water, REEs may be absorbed from the water by ion exchange and replace ions such as calcium or magnesium in organism tissues or can diffuse across cell membranes (Banaee et al. 2025). REEs may enter fish via the gill and then be taken up by ion transporters. For other organisms, REEs may be absorbed via the skin or adsorbed to exoskeletons (Banaee et al. 2025).
Fate, behaviour and partitioning in the environment
Like many metals, the speciation of REEs in natural waters is complex and dictated by many factors. Elderfield et al. (1990) first proposed that REEs fractionate into three main forms: insoluble particles, organically and inorganically bound colloids, and dissolved ions. All these forms together represent the “total” or “unfiltered” fraction (>0.45 µM), and the colloidal and dissolved forms together represent the “dissolved” or “filtered” fraction (<0.45 µM) (Byrne and Sholkovitz 1996). Colloidal forms are larger than the truly dissolved forms and as such they can be captured by filters between 0.22-0.45 µM in size.
The presence of colloidal surfaces and ligands largely dictates the relative concentrations of REE fractions (Sholkovitz 1992). REEs bound to colloids appear to be a major fraction present in fresh water (Elderfield et al. 1990; Byrne and Sholkovitz 1996) and represents a key factor in the fate and transportation of REEs (Sholkovitz 1992). REEs readily adsorb to the high surface area of iron (Fe)-containing colloids, and in fresh water LREEs show a higher affinity to Fe-containing colloids compared to HREEs which tend to remain as truly dissolved ions (Elderfield et al. 1990; Pokrovsky and Schott 2002; Tang and Johannesson 2003). For both LREEs and HREEs, the presence of ligands also represents a key factor in determining their fractionation. REEs form strong complexes with organic and inorganic ligands such as nitrates, chlorides, sulphates, carbonates, phosphates and hydroxides, with the latter three being very insoluble in water (Liu and Byrne 1997; Wells and Wells 2012). As a result, REEs tend to precipitate out of solution when bound to carbonates, phosphates, and hydroxides, thereby remaining in their “total” fraction and greatly limiting their bioavailability in aquatic environments (Tang and Johannesson 2003; Gonzalez et al. 2014). This tendency to competitively bind to REEs and reduce their bioavailability in the environment occurs most notably with hardness (as Ca2+-Mg2+ and carbonate) (Barry and Meehan 2000; Cardon et al. 2019; NRCan 2021b), alkalinity (as carbonate) (Moermond et al. 2001; Australian Government Department of Health 2014), pH (as H+ ions) (Sholkovitz 1992; Moermond et al. 2001; Bouchaud et al. 2012; El-Akl et al. 2015), and dissolved organic matter (as various acids) (Tang and Johannesson 2003; Marang et al. 2008; Lachaux et al. 2022a; Zilber et al. 2024).
Unlike in fresh water, where many factors characterize the speciation of REEs, in the marine environment REE fate and behaviour are largely driven by the abundance of carbonate present (Henderson 1984; Cantrell and Byrne 1987; Byrne and Sholkovitz 1996). In general, oceans tend to be HREE-enriched (Elderfield et al. 1988; Piepgras and Jacobsen 1992; Piarulli et al. 2021), suggested to be as a result of their stability in the dissolved phase, compared to LREEs which more readily complex to carbonate (Yang and Haley 2016; Sutorius et al. 2022). The lateral and vertical distribution of REEs varies greatly in seawater. On a large scale, the vertical distribution of REEs is affected by the process of metal scavenging, causing REEs to settle as insoluble particles and become sequestered by sediments (Piarulli et al. 2021). As a result, marine environments generally see an increase in REE concentrations at greater depths (Elderfield et al. 1988; Piepgras and Jacobsen 1992; Piarulli et al. 2021).
REEs typically occur in the trivalent state in aquatic systems, however, cerium may also be present as its oxidized form, Ce4+ (Elderfield et al. 1988; Railsback 2012). Cerium’s oxidation potential causes it to be a notable outlier in its behaviour. In both freshwater and marine environments, Ce4+ forms an insoluble complex, CeO2, causing it to be depleted from the water column to a greater extent than other REEs (Elderfield et al. 1988; De Baar et al. 1991; Weltje et al. 2002b). The formation of this complex is strongly dependent on pH, with higher pH values yielding greater CeO2 concentrations (Elderfield et al. 1990).
Because of their affinity for particle surfaces, REEs are mainly bound to sediments or suspended particles in the water column (MacMillan et al. 2017). The composition of sediment has an impact on the bioavailability of REEs to aquatic organisms, with grain size and organic content being factors that influence release and mobility in the water column (Banaee et al. 2025). Sediment-water partition coefficients (Log Kp(sed/w)) for laboratory and field for yttrium, lanthanum, cerium and neodymium have been reported as 5.18 and 6.04, 5.52 and 6.37, 5.78 and 6.31, and 5.67 and 6.27, respectively (Stronkhorst and Yland 1998 as reported in Sneller et al. 2000) demonstrating the relatively high affinity of REEs to sediment (Sneller et al. 2000).
REE levels have been shown to decrease with trophic position among biota samples in the Canadian Arctic, indicating low potential for biomagnification (MacMillan et al. 2017). Geometric Mean (GM) ∑REE tissue concentrations in resident species varied from 0.013 to 103 nmol/g dw and the highest GM concentrations were found in biota at the base of the food chain, particularly in lichen/moss (42 ±81 nmol/g dw ), marine invertebrates (sea urchins 17 ±7.6 nmol/g dw, blue mussels 38 ±5.9 nmol/g dw) and freshwater invertebrates (benthic invertebrates 33 ±85 nmol/g dw, zooplankton 103 ±484 nmol/g dw) (MacMillan et al. 2017). Similar results were seen in temperate lake food webs, whereby REE tissue concentrations decreased with trophic position, indicating that REEs are subject to the process of trophic dilution (Amyot et al. 2017). Further evidence of bio-dilution comes from Dang et al. (2023) who reported lower enrichment of REEs in zooplankton (lanthanum = 11.6 ±8.3 mg/kg) than phytoplankton (lanthanum = 26.4 ±4.8 mg/kg). In Canadian lakes that are located away from the mining activity, Amyot et al. (2017) found that individual and total REE concentrations were strongly related with each other in different components of food webs and the median bioaccumulation factors (BAFs) ranged from 1.3, 3.7, 4.0 and 4.4 L/kg (ww) for fish muscle, zooplankton, predatory invertebrates and nonpredatory invertebrates, respectively.
Aquatic toxicity
The current status of REE toxicity data represents significant progress since 2014 when the members of the Canadian Rare Earth Elements Network (CREEN) noted that data on toxic effects of REEs were limited and that further work was required to develop methods of safe management of REE tailings (GC 2014). Based on CREEN recommendations, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) established a multi-year program to address data gaps for REEs, including gaps in ecotoxicity data. NRCan efforts have successfully fulfilled the minimum toxicity data requirements for CCME long-term Type A freshwater quality guidelines for cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium. The water toxicity data in this factsheet are current to July 2024.
Because REEs tend to precipitate out of solution during toxicity tests, the studies commissioned by NRCan were conducted in soft waters to maintain a relatively higher degree of solubility during toxicity tests; however, solubility remained a concern. Endpoints were based on the measured dissolved concentrations at the beginning of the test (at Time 0). In the present case, where the concentrations in the medium may well decrease during the period before the next renewal, the actual exposure concentration will be overestimated (and hence toxicity will be underestimated). In other words, this approach will not represent the true exposure concentration. A preferable approach would be determining the average concentration at the beginning and the end of the renewals or statistically calculated geometric mean if test concentrations decrease exponentially. The influence of various factors affecting solubility of REEs in toxicity tests has been evaluated by NRCan, including test containers, addition of food, and test organisms, as well as consideration of speciation of REEs in toxicity tests and calculation of time-weighted averages of exposure concentrations (NRCan 2021b). Time-weighted correction factors, derived by comparing average to initial exposure concentrations, were calculated for some species and elements and were found to range from 0.09 to 0.71 (NRCan 2021b). Due to the differences across tests and the lack of availability for all species and elements, correction factors were not applied to the current REE dataset; however, implementation may be considered in the future as the science develops.
The aquatic toxicity of REEs can be influenced by several factors such as hardness, alkalinity, pH, dissolved organic matter (DOM) and the presence of various ligands. These toxicity modifying factors (TMFs) primarily affect the bioavailability of REEs through competitive binding, thereby removing REEs from solution and providing a protective effect to the test organism. Increases in water hardness and alkalinity reduce the toxicity of REEs across a number of taxa due to their complexation with carbonate and Ca2+ ions (Barry and Meehan 2000; Borgmann et al. 2005; Kang et al. 2022; EGLE 2024; Zhang et al. 2024). Increases in pH (from pH 5 to 9.5) have been shown to reduce the toxicity of REEs due to their complexation with OH- and carbonate ions, as observed in Kang et al. (2022) and Zhang et al. (2024). Increases in DOM can also reduce the toxicity of REEs in invertebrates through REE-DOM complexation (Vukov et al. 2016; Lachaux et al. 2022a; Zhang et al. 2024); but conversely, DOM may increase the accumulation of REEs in algae through its effects on the membrane permeability of algal cells, resulting in greater than expected toxicity (Zilber et al. 2024). Despite meeting the minimum toxicity data requirements for guideline development, insufficient data were available for the normalization of REE toxicity endpoints to these water quality parameters. As the science develops, the effects of TMFs in modulating toxicity responses could be considered for interpreting and applying Federal Water Quality Guidelines (FWQGs) on a case-by-case (site-specific) basis.
The use of phosphorus (often as phosphate, K2HPO4) in algal and plant toxicity tests represents a considerable challenge given its necessity in the growth media, and its ability to precipitate REEs during the test exposure (Barry and Meehan 2000; Lürling and Tolman 2010; Joonas et al. 2017). As a result, when phosphate is used in algae/plant growth mediums, the growth inhibition observed may very well be due to the depletion of phosphate (through complexation with REEs) as opposed to the direct toxicity of REEs. This confounding effect can be addressed by using a phosphorus-replete species (Chlorella fusca) which can grow in the absence of phosphorus (Aharchaou et al. 2020) or by using organic-phosphorus (like β-glycerophosphate) in the growth medium, which provides phosphorus to the organisms but does not induce precipitation (NRCan 2021a). For example, Aharchaou et al (2020) observed that in test solutions at pH 5.5 with no precipitate formation, toxicity thresholds for lanthanum and cerium were 10 to 1000 times lower than those reported in earlier studies and suggested several likely factors, such as (i) insoluble phosphate species did not form in their exposure media; (ii) presence of protective chemical species (for example calcium) at various levels in the different studies; and/or (iii) marked differences in the sensitivity of species. For FWQGs, only algal/plant studies that used either a phosphorus-replete species or organic phosphorus were deemed acceptable for use in guideline derivation.
Despite some progress being made on elucidating the toxic effects of REEs, knowledge gaps remain regarding the relative toxicities of each fraction (total, colloidal and truly dissolved) on aquatic organisms (Zhang et al. 2024). A few studies on invertebrates have suggested that the particulate, or total, fraction could induce toxic effects; however, the authors were unable to separate out the effects of the dissolved (truly dissolved and colloidal) fraction (Stauber and Binet 2000; Blinova et al. 2018). Other studies have demonstrated that complexed REEs, presumably existing as colloids, may be responsible for inducing toxic effects; however, these studies are so far limited only to plant (Lemna minor) (Weltje et al. 2002a; NRCan 2021b; Sharma et al. 2024) and algae models (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii) (Crémazy et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2014; Zhao and Wilkinson 2015). Much of the information currently available points to the dissolved form, and in some cases the free-ion form, likely being the best representation of what is bioavailable to aquatic organisms (Herrmann et al. 2016; Vukov et al. 2016; Aharchaou et al. 2020; Banaee et al. 2025). Therefore, where data permitted, guidelines were based on dissolved concentrations to best reflect the bioavailable form. Researchers continue to make progress on understanding the influence of bioavailability and fractionation on the toxicity of REEs to aquatic organisms.
Currently, there is no consensus regarding the relative toxicities of REEs on the basis of their atomic properties (Vignati et al. 2024). Similar toxicity across the REE series has been noted for algae and invertebrates (as reviewed by Blinova et al. 2020), which is in accordance with Lachaux et al. (2022b) that noted that Daphnia magna had homogenous toxicity to neodymium, gadolinium and ytterbium. On the other hand, Gonzales et al. (2014) argued that factors such as the composition of test solutions, and differences in test endpoints and species present too many inconsistencies to confidently verify the presence or absence of uniformity. Overall, more research is needed to confirm whether REEs show comparable toxicities across a wide range of test organisms and conditions as a function of their chemical similarities.
Federal water guality guidelines
A detailed review of available aquatic toxicity studies was performed by ECCC following guidance from CCME (2007) for data quality, and Robust Study Summary (RSS) evaluation forms were completed for each study. Determinants of test acceptability included, but were not limited to, exposure duration, documentation of control response, use of suitable biological endpoints and inclusion of appropriate statistical analyses. Due to the propensity of REEs to precipitate in solution, special consideration was given to whether concentrations were measured and/or maintained throughout the test, the type and duration of the test, the use of phosphate in algae and plant toxicity tests, and if standard procedures were followed. Nominal (unmeasured) concentration data were only accepted for chronic aquatic exposures if there was renewal of test concentrations, due to the issues with solubility and precipitation. Data were categorized as acceptable (either primary or secondary data quality) or unacceptable for use in guideline derivation (see Appendices A-D). Data were not considered for mixtures or for nanoparticles of REEs, given that their modes of action and toxicities may differ. While nanomaterials containing REEs that may be present in environmental media or in products are not explicitly considered, measured concentrations in the environment could in part include REEs from these sources. Toxicity studies that were considered irrelevant for guideline derivation or that were inaccessible are listed in Appendix L.
Federal Water Quality Guidelines (FWQGs) are preferably developed following CCME protocol (CCME 2007). The preferred derivation methodFootnote 1 is a Type A approach (Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD)), followed by a Type B approach (application of a safety factor) (CCME 2007). In summary, the long-term CCME Type A guideline requires acceptable chronic toxicity data for at least three fish species (including one salmonid and one non-salmonid), three invertebrates (one planktonic crustacean and two additional aquatic or semi-aquatic species) and at least one vascular plant or algal species (two additional non-target plants required if plants are among the most sensitive species). Toxicity endpoints for amphibians are desirable, but not essential. The long-term FWQGs for cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium all met CCME minimum data requirements for a Type A approach for freshwater exposure. For acute exposure, CCME Type A approach requires acceptable acute data for three fish species (including one salmonid and one non-salmonid) and three invertebrates (including one planktonic crustacean). Algal and amphibian species are desirable but not required. The short-term freshwater benchmarks for cerium and lanthanum met CCME minimum data requirements for a Type A guideline. Neodymium and yttrium short-term benchmarks did not meet requirements for Type A; however, they did meet minimum data requirements for Type B2 guidelines, which at minimum require acceptable acute data for two fish species (one salmonid and one non-salmonid) and two invertebrates (including one planktonic crustacean).
For the short-term benchmarks, the acute toxicity datasets used acceptable LC50 endpoints or equivalents (CCME 2007). For the long-term guidelines, the most preferred endpoints were selected from the acceptable chronic toxicity data for deriving the long-term freshwater guidelines following CCME protocol (2007). Some endpoints in the dataset were derived from the CETIS (Comprehensive Environmental Toxicity Information System) outputs included in the appendices of the NRCan reports. The range of toxicity data used to derive the individual REE guidelines are summarized in the relevant sections below. Overall, toxicity data showed that the relative toxicity of these REEs varied among taxonomic groups and that species sensitivity was not consistent. Species included in guideline development were either resident species of Canada or were determined to be appropriate surrogates (see Appendix I).
Aquatic toxicity for marine exposure was also considered; however, data were limited. Toxicity of various individual REEs to marine organisms includes adverse effects on development, cell and tissue damage, oxidative stress and neurotoxicity (Piarulli et al. 2021). Acceptable data specifically for lanthanum, cerium, neodymium and yttrium are summarized in the Marine exposure section; however, insufficient data were available for guideline derivation.
Species sensitivity distributions
The R package (R version 4.4.2) ‘ssdtools’ (version 2.2.0) and the corresponding user-friendly web application ‘shinyssdtools’ (version 0.3.5; Thorley and Schwarz 2018; Dalgarno 2021) were used to create model averaged SSDs for cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium. The package fits several default cumulative distribution functions (log-normal, log-logistic, gamma, log-Gumbel, Weibull, log-normal mixture) to the data using maximum likelihood estimation as the regression method. A model averaged hazardous concentration at 5% (HC5) was established using Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc; Burnham and Anderson 2004). The HC5 is then used as the short-term benchmark or long-term guideline value. See Thorley and Schwarz (2018) and Fox et al. (2021) for more information on the approach. The full R script and model fit results are available in Appendices J‑K.
Cerium
Short-term benchmark
Acceptable acute data were available for cerium to meet CCME minimum data requirements for a short-term freshwater benchmark following a Type A approach (CCME 2007). The dataset included three fish and three invertebrate species, with the most sensitive being Oncorhynchus mykiss (96-h LC50 of 130 µg Ce/L) and the least sensitive being Hyalella azteca (96-h LC50 of 11,200 µg Ce/L). The endpoint for O. mykiss was obtained from a REACH registration dossier for cerium as reported to the ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) Chemicals Database, and while a full RSS form was completed based on available information in the data entry and was deemed acceptable, the original report was not available for verification. Therefore, there is some uncertainty associated with this endpoint; however, it was included as it fulfilled minimum data requirements for a salmonid endpoint and was the most sensitive endpoint in the acute cerium dataset. The acute dataset and SSD for cerium can be seen in Table 4 and Figure 1, respectively. The short-term benchmark concentration, derived from the HC5 of the acute SSD, is 81 µg Ce/L. The available acute dataset contained both dissolved and total endpoints, as it was not possible to fulfil minimum data requirements based solely on one fraction. Therefore, the short-term benchmark applies to total concentrations of cerium measured in water samples, and the inclusion of the dissolved endpoints in the dataset errs on the side of conservatism.
| Group | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (µg Ce/L) | Concentration Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Rainbow trout | 96-h LC50 | 130 | Measureda | ECHA 2011 |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | Water flea | 48-h LC50 | 244.59 | Total | Galdiero et al. 2019 |
| Invertebrate | Hydra attenuata | Hydra | 96-h EC50 (morphological change/ mortality) | 1,797 | Dissolved | Gonzales et al. 2015 |
| Fish | Danio rerio | Zebrafish | 96-h LC50 | 1,849.53 | Dissolved | Kang et al. 2022 |
| Fish | Pimephales promelas | Fathead minnow | 96-h LC50 | 3,490 | Total | EGLE 2024 |
| Invertebrate | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 96-h LC50 | 11,200 | Total | EGLE 2024 |
a Measured concentration not specified in data source as total or dissolved
h – hour, EC – effect concentration, LC – lethal concentration
Figure 1. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) for the acute toxicity of cerium in freshwater. The HC5 (dotted line) is 81 µg Ce/L (rounded to two significant figures), and the shaded area shows the confidence intervals.
Long description
Figure 1 illustrates the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) of acute toxicity data for cerium concentrations in fish and aquatic invertebrates in fresh water. The acute SSD is used to derive the short-term benchmark for toxicity of cerium to aquatic organisms. A model-averaged distribution is shown on the graph fit to six acute datapoints for aquatic organisms. The 5th percentile of the distribution (HC5) was calculated at 81 µg Ce/L (rounded to two significant figures) and selected as the short-term benchmark for cerium. This figure shows that the sensitivity of aquatic organisms to cerium follows an S-shaped curve.
Long-term guideline
Acceptable data were available for cerium to meet CCME minimum data requirements for a long-term freshwater guideline following a Type A approach (CCME 2007). The chronic cerium dataset included no- or low-effect data for 17 species, including three fish, nine invertebrates and five plant or algal species (Table 5). Ceriodaphnia dubia was the most sensitive species (7-day IC10 of 2.3 µg Ce/L), while Spirodela polyrhiza was the least sensitive (10-day IC10 of 1,945 µg Ce/L). The dataset and SSD for chronic exposure to cerium can be seen in Table 5 and Figure 2, respectively. The long-term FWQG, derived from the HC5 of the chronic SSD, is 1.6 µg Ce/L. The long-term guideline applies to dissolved concentrations of cerium, as the majority of the dataset represented the dissolved fraction. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that exclusion of the nominal endpoints from the dataset had a minimal effect on the guideline value. Therefore, the nominal endpoints were retained to increase species representation.
| Group | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (µg Ce/L) | Concentration Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invertebrate | Ceriodaphnia dubia | Water flea | 7-d IC10 (reproduction) | 2.32 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Invertebrate | Lymnaea stagnalis | Great pond snail | 28-d EC10 (embryo hatching success) | 2.7 | Nominal | Casey et al. 2019 |
| Algae/Plant | Chlorella vulgaris | Green alga | 72-h IC10 (cell yield) | 3.85 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Algae/Plant | Raphidocelis subcapitata | Green alga | 72-h IC10 (cell yield) | 5.50 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Fish | Salmo trutta | Brown trout | 28-d IC10 (length) | 6.66 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Fish | Pimephales promelas | Fathead minnow | 7-d larval IC10 (biomass) | 15.7 | Dissolved | NRCan 2017 |
| Invertebrate | Heterocypris incongruens | Ostracod | 6-d EC10 (growth inhibition) | 16 | Dissolved | Gonzales et al. 2015 |
| Fish | Oncorhynchus kisutch | Coho salmon | 35-d IC10 (dry weight) | 17.4 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Invertebrate | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 14-d IC10 (dry weight) | 20.4 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Algae/Plant | Chlorella fusca | Green alga | 5-d EC20 (growth) | 56.05 | Total dissolveda | Aharchaou et al. 2020 |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | Water flea | 21-d MATC (reproduction) | 71.34 | Nominal | Ma et al. 2016 |
| Invertebrate | Brachionus calyciflorus | Rotifer | 48-h EC10 (reproduction) | 93 | Dissolved | Gonzales et al. 2015 |
| Algae/Plant | Lemna minor | Common duckweed | 7-d IC10 (dry weight) | 134.97 | Nominal | NRCan 2021a |
| Invertebrate | Chironomus dilutus | Midge | 10-d IC10 (dry weight) | 490 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Invertebrate | Neocloeon triangulifer | Mayfly | 14-d IC10 (dry weight) | 1,020 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Invertebrate | Sphaerium sp. | Fingernail clam | 28-d LC10 | 1,345 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Algae/Plant | Spirodela polyrhiza | Common duckmeat | 10-d IC10 (frond yield) | 1,945 | Nominal | Carpenter et al. 2019 |
a Samples were filtered through two superimposed 2µm filters.
d – days, EC – effect concentration, h – hour, IC – inhibition concentration, LC – lethal concentration, MATC – maximum acceptable toxicant concentration
Figure 2. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) for the chronic toxicity of cerium in freshwater. The HC5 (dotted line) is 1.6 µg Ce/L (rounded to two significant figures), and the shaded area shows the confidence intervals.
Long description
Figure 2 illustrates the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) of chronic toxicity data for cerium concentrations in fish, algae/plants, and aquatic invertebrates in fresh water. The chronic SSD is used to derive the long-term guideline for toxicity of cerium to aquatic organisms. A model-averaged distribution is shown on the graph fit to 17 chronic datapoints for aquatic organisms. The 5th percentile of the distribution (HC5) was calculated at 1.6 µg Ce/L (rounded to two significant figures) and selected as the long-term guideline for cerium. This figure shows that the sensitivity of aquatic organisms to cerium follows an S-shaped curve.
Lanthanum
Short-term benchmark
The acceptable acute dataset for lanthanum met CCME minimum data requirements for a short-term freshwater benchmark following a Type A approach (CCME 2007). The acute dataset contained LC50 or equivalent endpoints for nine species, including four fish and five invertebrates. The most sensitive species was Hydra attenuata (96-h LC50 of 210 µg La/L), while the least sensitive was Tetrahymena shanghaiensis (24-h IC50 of 277,810 µg La/L). The endpoint for O. mykiss was obtained from a REACH registration dossier for lanthanum as reported to the ECHA Chemicals Database, and while a full RSS form was completed on the data entry and deemed acceptable, the original report was not available for verification. Therefore, there is some uncertainty associated with this endpoint; however, it was included in the dataset to meet minimum data requirements for a salmonid species and because it was the second most sensitive endpoint. The acute SSD dataset and figure for lanthanum can be seen in Table 6 and Figure 3, respectively. The HC5 and short-term benchmark for lanthanum in fresh water is 160 µg La/L. The acute dataset was comprised of both dissolved and total concentrations, as it was not possible to fulfil minimum data requirements based solely on one fraction. Therefore, the short-term benchmark applies to total concentrations of lanthanum sampled in water, and the inclusion of the dissolved endpoints in the dataset errs on the side of conservatism.
| Group | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (µg La/L) | Concentration Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invertebrate | Hydra attenuata | Hydra | 96-h LC50 | 210 | Nominal | Blaise et al. 2018 |
| Fish | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Rainbow trout | 96-h LC50 | 420 | Dissolved | ECHA 2014 |
| Fish | Gobiocypris rarus | Rare minnow | 96-h LC50 | 1,920 | Nominal | Hua et al. 2017 |
| Fish | Danio rerio | Zebrafish | 96-h LC50 | 2,194.70 | Dissolved | Kang et al. 2022 |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | Water flea | 48-h LC50 | 3,200 | Dissolved | Shu et al. 2023 |
| Fish | Pimephales promelas | Fathead minnow | 96-h LC50 | 3,610 | Total | EGLE 2024 |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia similis | Water flea | 48-h EC50 (immobility) | 14,840 (Geomean) | Total | Egler et al. 2023 |
| Invertebrate | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 96-h LC50 | 18,900 | Total | EGLE 2024 |
| Invertebrate | Tetrahymena shanghaiensis | Ciliated protozoan | 24-h IC50 (cell count) | 277,810 | Nominal | Wang et al. 2000 |
EC – effect concentration, h – hour, IC – inhibition concentration, LC – lethal concentration
Figure 3. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) for the acute toxicity of lanthanum in freshwater. The HC5 (dotted line) is 160 µg La/L (rounded to two significant figures), and the shaded area shows the confidence intervals.
Long description
Figure 3 illustrates the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) of acute toxicity data for lanthanum concentrations in fish and aquatic invertebrates in fresh water. The acute SSD is used to derive the short-term benchmark for toxicity of lanthanum to aquatic organisms. A model-averaged distribution is shown on the graph fit to nine acute datapoints for aquatic organisms. The 5th percentile of the distribution (HC5) was calculated at 160 µg La/L (rounded to two significant figures) and selected as the short-term benchmark for lanthanum. This figure shows that the sensitivity of aquatic organisms to lanthanum follows an S-shaped curve.
Long-term guideline
The acceptable chronic dataset for lanthanum met CCME minimum data requirements for a long-term freshwater guideline following a Type A approach (CCME 2007). Toxicity data for 13 species (three fish, six invertebrates and four plants) were selected for the lanthanum guideline (Table 7). Plant species Chlorella vulgaris (72-h IC10 of 3.59 µg La/L) and invertebrate Neocloeon triangulifer (14-d IC10 of 1,040 µg La/L) were the most and least sensitive species, respectively. The HC5 from the SSD (Figure 4) represents the long-term lanthanum guideline in fresh water and is 2.4 µg La/L. As the chronic lanthanum dataset was comprised mostly of dissolved concentrations, the long-term guideline applies to dissolved concentrations of lanthanum sampled in water. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that exclusion of the L. minor nominal endpoint from the dataset had minimal effect on the guideline value, and therefore it was retained to increase species representation.
| Group | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (µg La/L) | Concentration Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algae/Plant | Chlorella vulgaris | Green alga | 72-h IC10 (cell yield) | 3.59 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Fish | Salmo trutta | Brown trout | 28-d IC10 (dry weight) | 7.24 | Dissolved | NRCan 2017 |
| Algae/Plant | Raphidocelis subcapitata | Green alga | 72-h IC10 (cell yield) | 9.57 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Invertebrate | Ceriodaphnia dubia | Water flea | 7-d IC10 (reproduction) | 9.79 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Fish | Pimephales promelas | Fathead minnow | 7-d IC10 (biomass) | 19.8 | Dissolved | NRCan 2017 |
| Algae/Plant | Chlorella fusca | Green alga | 5-d EC20 (growth) | 31.95 | Total dissolveda | Aharchaou et al. 2020 |
| Invertebrate | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 14-d IC10 (dry weight) | 71.7 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | Water flea | 21-d MATC (body length/ mean brood size) | 80.11 | Dissolved | Shu et al. 2023 |
| Fish | Oncorhynchus kisutch | Coho salmon | 35-d EC10 (survival) | 206.5 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Invertebrate | Sphaerium sp. | Fingernail clam | 28-d IC10 (dry weight) | 360 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Algae/Plant | Lemna minor | Common duckweed | 7-d IC10 (dry weight) | 538.78 | Nominal | NRCan 2021a |
| Invertebrate | Chironomus dilutus | Midge | 10-d IC10 (dry weight) | 750 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Invertebrate | Neocloeon triangulifer | Mayfly | 14-d IC10 (dry weight) | 1,040 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
a Samples were filtered through two superimposed 2µm filters.
d – days, EC – effect concentration, h – hour, IC – inhibition concentration, MATC – maximum acceptable toxicant concentration
Figure 4. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) for the chronic toxicity of lanthanum in fresh water. The HC5 (dotted line) is 2.4 µg La/L, and the shaded area shows the confidence intervals.
Long description
Figure 4 illustrates the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) of chronic toxicity data for lanthanum concentrations in fish, algae/plants, and aquatic invertebrates in fresh water. The chronic SSD is used to derive the long-term guideline for toxicity of lanthanum to aquatic organisms. A model-averaged distribution is shown on the graph fit to 13 chronic datapoints for aquatic organisms. The 5th percentile of the distribution (HC5) was calculated at 2.4 µg La/L and selected as the long-term guideline for lanthanum. This figure shows that the sensitivity of aquatic organisms to lanthanum follows an S-shaped curve.
Neodymium
Short-term benchmark
Minimum CCME data requirements were met for a Type B2 approach (CCME 2007) for acute freshwater exposure to neodymium, including acceptable LC50 or equivalent endpoints for two fish and five invertebrate species. Table 8 contains the most sensitive LC50 or equivalent endpoint for each species in the acceptable acute toxicity dataset. The O. mykiss endpoint is an unbounded value, for which effects were not seen at the highest concentration level in the study. Because the endpoint was not directly used to derive the guideline value following a Type B2 approach, and because the study showed the species to be insensitive to the concentrations tested, the endpoint was considered acceptable to meet minimum data requirements. The lowest endpoint was a 48-h EC50 of 227.2 µg Nd/L for mortality of Daphnia pulex. Following CCME protocol, the most sensitive LC50 or equivalent endpoint from an acute exposure study is the critical study to which a safety factor of 10 is applied to derive the short-term exposure Type B2 guideline. The safety factor of 10 accounts for differences in sensitivity to a chemical due to differences in species, exposure conditions, and test endpoints, as well as a paucity of toxicological data (CCME 2007). Therefore, the short-term freshwater benchmark for neodymium is 23 µg Nd/L. Because the critical endpoint was for a dissolved measurement, the short-term neodymium benchmark applies to dissolved concentrations.
| Group | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (µg Nd/L) | Concentration Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invertebrate | Daphnia pulex | Water flea | 48-h EC50 (mortality) | 227.2 | Dissolved | King et al. 2005 |
| Invertebrate | Hydra attenuata | Hydra | 96-h LC50 | 310 | Nominal | Blaise et al. 2018 |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | Water flea | 48-h EC50 (immobility) | 332 | Dissolved | Do 2024 |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia similis | Water flea | 48-h EC50 (immobility) | 9,190 | Total | Egler et al. 2023 |
| Fish | Danio rerio | Zebrafish | 96-h LC50 | 55,580 | Measureda | Lora-Benitez et al. 2024 |
| Invertebrate | Caenorhabditis elegans | Round worm | 48-h LC50 | 57,503 | Nominal | Xu et al. 2017 |
| Fish | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Rainbow trout | 96-h LC50 | > 40,000 | Nominal | Dubé et al. 2019 |
a Measured concentration not specified in data source as total or dissolved
EC – effect concentration, h – hour, LC – lethal concentration
Long-term guideline
The acceptable chronic dataset for neodymium met minimum requirements for a Type A approach (CCME 2007). Toxicity data for 13 species, including three fish, six invertebrate and four plant/algal species, were selected for deriving the neodymium guideline (Table 9). Lymnaea stagnalis was the most sensitive (28-d EC10 1.6 µg Nd/L), while Spirodela polyrhiza was the least sensitive species (10-d IC10 6965 µg Nd/L). The HC5 from the chronic SSD (Figure 5) represents the long-term guideline for neodymium and is 1.1 µg Nd/L. As the chronic neodymium dataset was comprised mostly of dissolved concentrations, the long-term guideline applies to dissolved concentrations of neodymium sampled in water. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that exclusion of the nominal endpoints from the dataset resulted in a higher guideline value, therefore those endpoints were retained to err on the side of conservatism and increase species representation in the dataset.
| Group | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (µg Nd/L) | Concentration Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invertebrate | Lymnaea stagnalis | Great pond snail | 28-d EC10 (embryo hatching success) | 1.6 | Nominal | Casey et al. 2019 |
| Algae/Plant | Chlorella vulgaris | Green alga | 72-h IC10 (cell yield) | 2.49 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Algae/Plant | Raphidocelis subcapitata | Green alga | 72-h IC10 (cell yield) | 8.22 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Invertebrate | Ceriodaphnia dubia | Water flea | 7-d IC10 (reproduction) | 20.77 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Fish | Salmo trutta | Brown trout | 28-d IC10 (dry weight) | 21.13 | Dissolved | NRCan 2017 |
| Fish | Pimephales promelas | Fathead minnow | 7-d larval IC10 (biomass) | 27.93 | Dissolved | NRCan 2017 |
| Fish | Oncorhynchus kisutch | Coho salmon | 35-d IC10 (dry weight) | 291.1 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Invertebrate | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 14-d IC10 (dry weight) | 306.9 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Algae/Plant | Lemna minor | Common duckweed | 7-d IC10 (frond count) | 669.61 | Nominal | NRCan 2021a |
| Invertebrate | Chironomus dilutus | Midge | 10-d IC10 (dry weight) | 680 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Invertebrate | Sphaerium sp. | Fingernail clam | 28-d LC10 | 710 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Invertebrate | Neocloeon triangulifer | Mayfly | 14-d IC10 (dry weight) | 1,050 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Algae/Plant | Spirodela polyrhiza | Common duckmeat | 10-d IC10 (frond yield) | 6,965 | Nominal | Carpenter et al. 2019 |
d – days, EC – effect concentration, h – hour, IC – inhibition concentration, LC – lethal concentration
Figure 5. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) for the chronic toxicity of neodymium in freshwater. The HC5 (dotted line) is 1.1 µg Nd/L (rounded to two significant figures), and the shaded area shows the confidence intervals.
Long description
Figure 5 illustrates the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) of chronic toxicity data for neodymium concentrations in fish, algae/plants, and aquatic invertebrates in fresh water. The chronic SSD is used to derive the long-term guideline for toxicity of neodymium to aquatic organisms. A model-averaged distribution is shown on the graph fit to 13 chronic datapoints for aquatic organisms. The 5th percentile of the distribution (HC5) was calculated at 1.1 µg Nd/L (rounded to two significant figures) and selected as the long-term guideline for neodymium. This figure shows that the sensitivity of aquatic organisms to neodymium follows an S-shaped curve.
Yttrium
Short-term benchmark
Minimum CCME data requirements were met for a Type B2 approach (CCME 2007) for acute freshwater exposure to yttrium, including two fish and three invertebrate species. Table 10 contains the most sensitive LC50 or equivalent endpoint for each species in the acceptable acute toxicity dataset. The lowest endpoint was a 48-h EC50 of 217 µg Y/L for immobility of Daphnia magna. Following CCME protocol, the most sensitive LC50 or equivalent endpoint from an acute exposure study is the critical study to which a safety factor of 10 is applied to derive the short-term Type B2 benchmark. The safety factor of 10 accounts for differences in sensitivity to a chemical due to differences in species, exposure conditions, and test endpoints, as well as a paucity of toxicological data (CCME 2007). Therefore, the short-term freshwater benchmark for yttrium is 22 µg Y/L. Because the critical endpoint was for a dissolved measurement, the short-term yttrium benchmark applies to dissolved concentrations.
| Group | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (µg Y/L) | Concentration Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | Water flea | 48-h EC50 (immobility) | 217 | Dissolved | Shah 2022 |
| Invertebrate | Hydra attenuata | Hydra | 96-h LC50 | 220 | Nominal | Blaise et al. 2018 |
| Fish | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Rainbow trout | 96-h LC50 | 700 | Nominal | Dubé et al. 2019 |
| Fish | Danio rerio | Zebrafish | 96-h LC50 | 45,610 | Measureda | Lora-Benitez et al. 2024 |
| Invertebrate | Tetrahymena shanghaiensis | Ciliated protozoan | 24-h IC50 (cell count) | 73,791 | Nominal | Wang et al. 2000 |
a Measured concentration not specified in data source as total or dissolved
EC – effect concentration, h – hour, IC – inhibition concentration, LC – lethal concentration
Long-term guideline
Minimum CCME data requirements were met for a long-term yttrium guideline following a Type A approach (CCME 2007). The yttrium SSD dataset (Table 11) contained 12 endpoints, including four fish, five invertebrates, and three plant/algal species. Chlorella vulgaris was the most sensitive (72-h IC10 of 2.685 µg Y/L), while Chironomus dilutus was the least sensitive species (10-d IC10 of 830 µg Y/L). The HC5 from the chronic SSD (Figure 6) represents the long-term guideline for yttrium and is 1.9 µg Y/L. The yttrium chronic dataset is mostly composed of endpoints for dissolved concentrations; therefore, the long-term guideline applies to the dissolved fraction of yttrium in water samples. The endpoint for C. dubia was not specified as a measurement for dissolved or total fraction, however, the endpoint was lower than dissolved endpoints for the same species from another study and was therefore included to err on the side of conservatism. A sensitivity analysis whereby the nominal endpoint for L. minor was excluded demonstrated minimal effect on the guideline value, and therefore the endpoint was retained to increase species representation.
| Group | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (µg Y/L) | Concentration Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Algae/Plant | Chlorella vulgaris | Green alga | 72-h IC10 (cell yield) | 2.69 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Algae/Plant | Raphidocelis subcapitata | Green alga | 72-h IC10 (cell yield) | 5.67 | Dissolved | NRCan 2021a |
| Invertebrate | Ceriodaphnia dubia | Water flea | 7-d IC10 (mortality/ reproduction) | 6.7 | Measureda | Okamoto et al. 2021 |
| Fish | Pimephales promelas | Fathead minnow | 7-d larval IC10 (biomass) | 12.9 | Dissolved | NRCan 2017 |
| Invertebrate | Daphnia magna | Water flea | 21-d EC10 (growth) | 19.80 (Geomean) | Dissolved | Do 2024 |
| Invertebrate | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 14-d IC10 (dry weight) | 25.98 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Fish | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Rainbow trout | 28-d MATC (wet weight) | 53.33 | Dissolved | Cardon et al 2019 |
| Fish | Salmo trutta | Brown trout | 28-d IC10 (dry weight) | 90.88 | Dissolved | NRCan 2017 |
| Algae/Plant | Lemna minor | Common duckweed | 7-d IC10 (dry weight) | 226.13 | Nominal | NRCan 2021a |
| Fish | Oncorhynchus kisutch | Coho salmon | 35-d IC10 (length) | 291.1 | Dissolved | NRCan 2018 |
| Invertebrate | Neocloeon triangulifer | Mayfly | 14-d IC10 (dry weight) | 690 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
| Invertebrate | Chironomus dilutus | Midge | 10-d IC10 (dry weight) | 830 | Dissolved | NRCan 2019b |
a Measured concentration not specified in data source as total or dissolved
d – days, EC – effect concentration, h – hour, IC – inhibition concentration, MATC – maximum acceptable toxicant concentration
Figure 6. Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) for the chronic toxicity of yttrium in freshwater. The HC5 (dotted line) is 1.9 µg Y/L, and the shaded area shows the confidence intervals.
Long description
Figure 6 illustrates the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) of chronic toxicity data for yttrium concentrations in fish, algae/plants, and aquatic invertebrates in fresh water. The chronic SSD is used to derive the long-term guideline for toxicity of yttrium to aquatic organisms. A model-averaged distribution is shown on the graph fit to 12 chronic datapoints for aquatic organisms. The 5th percentile of the distribution (HC5) was calculated at 1.9 µg Y/L and selected as the long-term guideline for yttrium. This figure shows that the sensitivity of aquatic organisms to yttrium follows an S-shaped curve.
Protectiveness assessment
To determine whether the long-term FWQGs for REEs are sufficiently protective and meet CCME’s guiding principle (CCME 2007), a protectiveness assessment was completed using results of acceptable aquatic toxicity studies (that is, all acceptable acute and chronic toxicity data where organisms were exposed via an aqueous exposure (see Appendices A-D) were compared to the long-term guideline values). Any toxic effects observed at concentrations below the REE FWQGs for chronic exposure were examined to determine if the protection clause was applicable (CCME 2007). Note that only laboratory-derived data were used in this assessment. Assessing the protectiveness of the guidelines using data from natural ecosystems is beyond the scope of this document. No endpoints in the acceptable acute and chronic water toxicity datasets were below long-term guideline values for lanthanum, neodymium or yttrium. For cerium, there was one endpoint for Daphnia magna below the long-term cerium guideline (48-h EC50 for immobility of 0.91 µg Ce3+/L as compared to the guideline of 1.6 µg dissolved Ce/L). However, this endpoint was for the free-ion concentration of cerium calculated using models and cannot be directly compared to measured dissolved or total concentrations. The dissolved measured concentration associated with that same EC50 endpoint from the same study and test conditions was well-above the guideline value. Additionally, there were 145 other acceptable endpoints for Daphnia magna in the cerium acute and chronic datasets for dissolved, total and free ion concentrations that were all above the long-term guideline (of which 140 endpoints were also EC50 values for immobility). Overall examination of the available data suggests the long-term FWQGs for cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium are consistent with the CCME guiding principle and are therefore intended to protect all forms of freshwater aquatic life for indefinite exposure periods.
Marine exposure
Minimum data requirements were not met for any approach to derive acute or chronic water guidelines for marine environments for cerium, lanthanum, neodymium or yttrium (see Appendices A-D). No acceptable marine data were available for cerium. Acceptable marine data for lanthanum were limited to a 72-h EC50 for developmental effects to Arbacia lixula of 2153 µg nominal La/L (Trifuoggi et al. 2017). For neodymium, acceptable data included 72-h LOEC (144 µg nominal Nd/L) and EC50 (216 µg nominal Nd/L) values for developmental effects to A. lixula (Trifuoggi et al. 2017) and a 48-h EC50 of 46,660 µg nominal Nd/L for immobility for Artemia salina (Bergsten-Torralba et al. 2020). Acceptable marine data for yttrium were limited to a 72-h LOEC (89 µg nominal Y/L) and EC50 (356 µg nominal Y/L) for developmental effects to A. lixula (Trifuoggi et al. 2017). It is not appropriate to apply the freshwater REE guidelines to marine or estuarine environments due to uncertainty in the relative toxicity of REEs in fresh water compared to saltwater.
Sediment toxicity
Testing with sediment collected from an area in Quebec naturally enriched in light REEs found physiochemical properties of sediment were important factors for REE availability and toxicity. A positive correlation was found with total REEs and fine grain size, base saturation, Fe and Al, and carbonate content (that is, greater availability and toxicity observed), while a negative correlation was found with sand, coarse silt, organic carbon and cation exchange capacity (that is, lower availability and toxicity observed) (Romero-Freire et al. 2018). Other tests conducted with sediment naturally enriched with REEs from a prospective mining area in Northern Quebec (∑REE concentration 118 mg/kg dw) demonstrated decreased locomotor activity and impaired osmoregulation in acute exposures and reproductive effects in chronic exposures with the amphipod Gammarus fossarum (Mehennaoui et al. 2024). Data from studies using naturally enriched sediment were not considered appropriate for guideline derivation due to the presence of multiple REEs.
Data on sediment-dwelling organisms using spiked-sediment toxicity testing were available for several species and demonstrated adverse effects on survival and growth for some species of benthic plant and invertebrates (see Appendices E-H). Laboratory data using spiked-sediment toxicity testing with a single REE per exposure were considered for derivation of sediment quality guidelines. The sediment toxicity data in this factsheet are current to July 2024. The majority of the available sediment toxicity data were derived from tests commissioned by NRCan.
Federal sediment quality guidelines
Federal Sediment Quality Guidelines (FSeQGs) are intended to protect sediment-dwelling biota. The guidelines apply to indefinite exposure periods to sediments and specify the concentration found in bulk sediment (dry weight) not expected to result in adverse effects. REEs are likely to bind to sediment particles (Weltje et al. 2002b; Hermann et al. 2016), thus highlighting the relevance of sediment quality guidelines for REEs.
Sediment quality guidelines can be developed according to two approaches (CCME 1995): (i) the National Status and Trends Program (NSTP) or (ii) the Spiked-Sediment Toxicity Test (SSTT). Since there were insufficient sediment data for the former, the NSTP approach was not considered further. For SSTT, low-effect endpoints are the preferred endpoint type for guideline derivation following CCME protocol (1995). Specifically, four studies (two of which must be partial or full life-cycle tests) are required on two or more sediment-dwelling North American invertebrate species (including one arthropod and one crustacean). Minimum data requirements for the SSTT approach were not strictly met, as only two studies were available for each element rather than the required four studies (see full sediment toxicity dataset in Appendices E-H).
NRCan (2019a) commissioned spiked sediment toxicity tests for the freshwater larval midge (Chironomus dilutus) and an amphipod (Hyalella azteca) for cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium, following the standardized sediment test methods of Environment Canada (1997, 2017). No adverse effects were observed for C. dilutus, whereas reduced survival was observed for H. azteca resulting in LC50 values of 342 mg Ce/kg dw, 375 mg La/kg dw, >391 mg Nd/kg dw and 243 mg Y/kg dw (see Appendices E-H). The growth of H. azteca was also reduced at the higher concentrations of these REEs, resulting in IC20 values of 211 mg Ce/kg dw, 225 mg La/kg dw, 323 mg Nd/kg dw and 206 mg Y/kg dw (Table 12, Appendices E-H). These sediment toxicity results are consistent with the water-based toxicity tests where C. dilutus was found to be less sensitive to REEs than H. azteca (NRCan 2018, 2019a, b). Sediment toxicity data from peer-reviewed journals were included as available. Data for the aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum aquaticum demonstrated less sensitivity compared to H. azteca (10-d LOEC of 500 mg/kg lanthanum dw (Table 12); NOEC >500 mg/kg dw for cerium and neodymium (Appendices E-G)). For the derivation of the FSeQGs, IC/EC20 values were selected as the preferred endpoint to represent a low-effect level, consistent with CCME’s aquatic life protocol (CCME 2007). The preferred low-effect endpoint for each species and element can be found in Table 12, while the full sediment toxicity dataset can be found in Appendices E-H.
| Element | Species Latin Name | Species Common Name | Endpoint | Effect Concentration (mg/kg dw)a | OC-adjusted Effect Concentration (mg/kg dw)b | Reference | FSeQG (mg/kg dw)c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cerium | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 14-d IC20 (growth) | 211 | 248 | NRCan 2019a | 25 |
| Cerium | Chironomus dilutus | Midge | 10-d IC20 (growth) | >857 | >1,008 | NRCan 2019a | - |
| Lanthanum | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 14-d IC20 (growth) | 225 | 265 | NRCan 2019a | 27 |
| Lanthanum | Myriophyllum aquaticum | Eurasian watermil-foil | 10-d LOEC (growth) | 500d | N/A | Gjata et al. 2024 | - |
| Lanthanum | Chironomus dilutus | Midge | 10-d IC20 (growth) | >844 | >993 | NRCan 2019a | - |
| Neodymium | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 14-d IC20 (survival) | 244 | 287 | NRCan 2019a | 29 |
| Neodymium | Chironomus dilutus | Midge | 10-d IC20 (growth) | >391 | >460 | NRCan 2019a | - |
| Yttrium | Hyalella azteca | Lawn shrimp | 14-d IC20 (growth) | 206 | 242 | NRCan 2019a | 24 |
| Yttrium | Chironomus dilutus | Midge | 10-d IC20 (growth) | >536 | >631 | NRCan 2019a | - |
a Tests performed in 0.85% organic carbon (OC) sediment unless otherwise noted.
b Concentration adjusted to 1% organic carbon sediment.
c Final guideline values are rounded to two significant figures.
d Percent organic carbon in sediment not reported in study.
IC – inhibition concentration, LOEC – lowest observed effect concentration, N/A – not available, ‘-’ – not applicable
Toxicity values were normalized to 1% organic carbon (OC) sediment because FSeQGs are typically derived for 1% OC sediment to provide a conservative benchmark for which to compare monitoring data. A safety factor of 10 was applied to OC-normalized IC20 values to yield sediment quality guidelines of 25, 27, 29 and 24 mg/kg dw for cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and yttrium, respectively (Table 12). The safety factor of 10 was chosen for lab to field extrapolation and because of limitations in the dataset (that is, four toxicity studies were not available as per minimum data requirements; CCME 1995). The FSeQG applies to freshwater sediments only. While making comparisons to the FSeQG, monitoring data should be normalized to 1% OC to assess whether the guideline value is exceeded.
Additional considerations
In the case of the water quality guidelines for REEs that apply to dissolved concentrations, these should be compared to monitoring data for dissolved samples. If guideline users only have total concentrations for their site, it is recommended that they first compare their total concentration to the dissolved REE guideline, and where there is an exceedance, re-sample the waterbody for the dissolved concentrations. In the case of the REE guidelines that apply to total concentrations (that is, short-term benchmarks for cerium and lanthanum), these should be compared to monitoring data based on total concentrations.
Because REEs are naturally occurring elements in the environment, consideration can be given to natural background concentrations at sites with guideline exceedances. There may be cases where natural background concentrations exceed the guideline without apparent effects on aquatic organisms (for example, if the substance is not present in a bioavailable form). Under these circumstances, it may be necessary to modify water quality guidelines to account for conditions that occur at the site. CCME (2003) provides guidance on two methods for establishing site-specific water quality objectives, which can be: 1) slightly above the natural background level, or 2) at the upper limit of natural background concentrations. To define natural background levels, it is recommended that research is conducted into historical records of elevated REE concentrations with historical land uses (that is, before and after human activity, and analysis of REE concentration trends). An extensive dataset of water parameters over several consecutive years for each site is required to estimate natural background levels.
Lastly, Jreije et al. (2022) found that the use of different membrane filter types, all with the same pore size of 0.45 µM, greatly affected the recovery of total and dissolved cerium from laboratory-prepared solutions, as well as for those sampled from rain and river water. Although the research is still ongoing, filter type appears to be an important consideration when working with REEs and should be noted in future studies to better account for its potential confounding effects.
References
Aharchaou, I., Beaubien, C., Campbell, P.G.C., and Fortin, C. 2020. Lanthanum and cerium toxicity to the freshwater green alga Chlorella fusca: applicability of the biotic ligand model. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 39(5): 996–1005.
Amyot, M., Clayden, M.G., MacMillan, G.A., Perron, T., and Arscott-Gauvin, A. 2017. Fate and trophic transfer of rare earth elements in temperate lake food webs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51(11): 6009–6017. American Chemical Society (ACS).
Australian Government Department of Health. 2014. Phoslock [PDF]. Existing Chemical Secondary Notification Assessment Report, GPO Box 58, Sydney NSW 2001 AUSTRALIA.
Banaee, M., Mossotto, C., Maganza, A., Azizi, R., Prearo, M., Pastorino, P., and Faggio, C. 2025. Rare earth elements on aquatic organisms: toxicity, detoxification, and ecological implications. Emerging Contaminants 11(1): 100457.
Barry, M.J., and Meehan, B.J. 2000. The acute and chronic toxicity of lanthanum to Daphnia carinata. Chemosphere 41(10): 1669–1674.
Bergsten-Torralba, L.R., Magalhães, D.P., Giese, E.C., Nascimento, C.R.S., Pinho, J.V.A., and Buss, D.F. 2020. Toxicity of three rare earth elements, and their combinations to algae, microcrustaceans, and fungi. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 201: 110795.
Blaise, C., Gagné, F., Harwood, M., Quinn, B., and Hanana, H. 2018. Ecotoxicity responses of the freshwater cnidarian Hydra attenuata to 11 rare earth elements. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 163: 486–491.
Blinova, I., Lukjanova, A., Muna, M., Vija, H., and Kahru, A. 2018. Evaluation of the potential hazard of lanthanides to freshwater microcrustaceans. Science of The Total Environment 642: 1100–1107.
Blinova, I., Muna, M., Heinlaan, M., Lukjanova, A., and Kahru, A. 2020. Potential hazard of lanthanides and lanthanide-based nanoparticles to aquatic ecosystems: data gaps, challenges and future research needs derived from bibliometric analysis. Nanomaterials 10(2): 328. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
Borgmann, U., Couillard, Y., Doyle, P., and Dixon, D.G. 2005. Toxicity of sixty-three metals and metalloids to Hyalella azteca at two levels of water hardness. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 24(3): 641–652.
Bouchaud, B., Balmain, J., Bonnet, G., and Pedraza, F. 2012. pH-distribution of cerium species in aqueous systems. Journal of Rare Earths (6): 559–562.
Brown, P.H., Rathjen, A.H., Graham, R.D., and Tribe, D.E. 1990. Chapter 92: Rare earth elements in biological systems. In Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths. Elsevier. pp. 423–452.
Burnham, K.P., and Anderson, D.R. (Editors). 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. In 2 ed. Springer, New York, NY.
Byrne, R.H., and Sholkovitz, E.R. 1996. Chapter 158: Marine chemistry and geochemistry of the lanthanides. In Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths. Elsevier. pp. 497–593.
Cardon, P.-Y., Triffault-Bouchet, G., Caron, A., Rosabal, M., Fortin, C., and Amyot, M. 2019. Toxicity and subcellular fractionation of yttrium in three freshwater organisms: Daphnia magna, Chironomus riparius, and Oncorhynchus mykiss. ACS Omega 4(9): 13747–13755. American Chemical Society.
Carpenter, D., C. Boutin, K.A. Docking and C. Casey. 2019. Experiment 6: Effects of REEs (Nd, Ce) on the floating aquatic plant Spirodela polyrhiza and on the submerged aquatic plant Myriophyllum spicatum. [Unpublished]. In CMP Final Progress Report: Rare Earth Elements (REEs) & Platinum Group Elements (PGEs): Study on aquatic and terrestrial plants and invertebrate, Project lead: C. Boutin and D. Carpenter. Science & Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada.
Casey, C., A. Tremblay, C. Boutin and D. Carpenter. 2019. Experiment 7: Effects of REEs (Nd, Ce) on the aquatic invertebrate Lymnaea stagnalis using eggs, egg masses and juvenile snails – establishing a correction/extrapolation factor. [Unpublished]. In CMP Final Progress Report: Rare Earth Elements (REEs) & Platinum Group Elements (PGEs): Study on aquatic and terrestrial plants and invertebrate, Project lead: C. Boutin and D. Carpenter. Science & Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada.
[CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 1995. Protocol for the derivation of Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life [PDF]. CCME EPC-98E. Prepared by Environment Canada, Guidelines Division, Technical Secretariat of the CCME Task Group on Water Quality Guidelines, Ottawa. Reprinted in Canadian environmental quality guidelines, Chapter 6, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 1999, Winnipeg.
[CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2007. A Protocol for the derivation of water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life [PDF]. CCME, Winnipeg, MB
Crémazy, A., Campbell, P.G.C., and Fortin, C. 2013. The biotic ligand model can successfully predict the uptake of a trivalent ion by a unicellular alga below pH 6.50 but not above: possible role of hydroxo-species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47(5): 2408–2415. American Chemical Society.
Dalgarno, S. 2021. shinyssdtools: A web application for fitting Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs). JOSS 6(57): 2848.
Dang, D.H., Wang, W., Winkler, G., and Chatzis, A. 2023. Rare earth element uptake mechanisms in plankton in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence. Sci Total Environ 860: 160394.
Das, T., Sharma, A., and Talukder, G. 1988. Effects of lanthanum in cellular systems. Biol Trace Elem Res 18(1): 201–228.
De Baar, H., Schijf, J., and Byrne, R. 1991. Solution chemistry of the rare earth elements in seawater. Eur. J. Solid State lnorg. Chem 28.
De Lima, I.B. 2016. Chapter 19 - Rare earths industry and eco-management: a critical review of recycling and substitutes. In Rare Earths Industry. Edited by I.B. De Lima and W. Leal Filho. Elsevier, Boston. pp. 293–304.
Do, C.V.-K. 2024. Effect of rare earth element mixtures on Daphnia magna. Master of Science in Integrative Biology, Wilfred Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5.
Dubé, M., Auclair, J., Hanana, H., Turcotte, P., Gagnon, C., and Gagné, F. 2019. Gene expression changes and toxicity of selected rare earth elements in rainbow trout juveniles. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 223: 88–95.
[ECCC] Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2022. National Long-term Water Quality Monitoring Data. Series, ECCC Data Catalogue [accessed 24 May 2022].
[ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2011. Cerium trinitrate. ECHA CHEM [accessed 10 February 2025].
[ECHA] European Chemicals Agency. 2014. Lanthanum trinitrate. ECHA CHEM [accessed 10 February 2025].
[EGLE] Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy. 2024. Acute toxicity testing of lanthanum and cerium on Hyalella azteca and Pimephales promelas. [Unpublished]. Final Report, Water Resources Division, Constitution Hall 525 West Allegan Lansing, Michigan 48909.
Egler, S.G., Roldão, T.M., Santos, G.O., Heidelmann, G.P., Giese, E.C., Correia, F.V., and Saggioro, E.M. 2023. Acute toxicity of single and combined rare earth element exposures towards Daphnia similis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 251: 114538.
El-Akl, P., Smith, S., and Wilkinson, K.J. 2015. Linking the chemical speciation of cerium to its bioavailability in water for a freshwater alga. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 34(8): 1711–1719.
Elderfield, H., Upstill-Goddard, R., and Sholkovitz, E.R. 1990. The rare earth elements in rivers, estuaries, and coastal seas and their significance to the composition of ocean waters. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 54(4): 971–991.
Elderfield, H., Whitfield, M., Burton, J.D., Bacon, M.P., and Liss, P.S. 1988. The oceanic chemistry of the rare-earth elements [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 325(1583): 105–126. Royal Society.
Environment Canada. 1997. Biological test method: test for survival and growth in sediment using larvae of freshwater midges (Chironomus tentans or Chironomus riparius) [PDF]. EPS 1/RM/32. December 1997. Method Development and Application Section, Environmental Technology Centre, Environment Canada. Ottawa, ON.
Environment Canada. 2017. Biological test method: test for survival and growth in sediment and water using the freshwater amphipod, Hyalella azteca [PDF]. EPS 1/RM/33, Second Edition, September 2017. Method Development and Applications Unit, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Fox, D. r., van Dam, R. a., Fisher, R., Batley, G. e., Tillmanns, A. r., Thorley, J., Schwarz, C. j., Spry, D. j., and McTavish, K. 2021. Recent developments in species sensitivity distribution modeling. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 40(2): 293–308.
Galdiero, E., Carotenuto, R., Siciliano, A., Libralato, G., Race, M., Lofrano, G., Fabbricino, M., and Guida, M. 2019. Cerium and erbium effects on Daphnia magna generations: a multiple endpoints approach. Environmental Pollution 254: 112985.
Gjata, I., van Drimmelen, C.K.E., Tommasi, F., Paciolla, C., and Heise, S. 2024. Impact of rare earth elements in sediments on the growth and photosynthetic efficiency of the benthic plant Myriophyllum aquaticum. J Soils Sediments.
Gonzalez, V., Vignati, D.A.L., Leyval, C., and Giamberini, L. 2014. Environmental fate and ecotoxicity of lanthanides: are they a uniform group beyond chemistry? Environment International 71: 148–157.
González, V., Vignati, D.A.L., Pons, M.-N., Montarges-Pelletier, E., Bojic, C., and Giamberini, L. 2015. Lanthanide ecotoxicity: first attempt to measure environmental risk for aquatic organisms. Environmental Pollution 199: 139–147.
Gosen, B.S.V., Verplanck, P.L., Long, K.R., Gambogi, J., and Ii, R.R.S. 2014. The rare-earth elements: vital to modern technologies and lifestyles. In Fact Sheet. U.S. Geological Survey.
Government of British Columbia. 2022. B.C. Environmental Monitoring System Results. Open Government [accessed 24 May 2022].
[GC] Government of Canada. 1999. Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 [PDF]. S.C., 1999, c. 33, Canada Gazette. Part III, vol. 22, no. 3. Published by the Minister of Justice, Government of Canada.
[GC] Government of Canada. 2014. The Rare Earth Elements Industry in Canada - Summary of Evidence [PDF], House of Commons Canada - Standing Committee on Natural Resources.
Handley, L.A., and Dyer, R.D. 2018. GeologyOntario. McFaulds Lake (“Ring of Fire”) Area Lake Sediment and Water Geochemistry, Northern Ontario. Ontario Geological Survey.
Hedrick, J.B. 2002. Rare earths [PDF]. U.S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook.
Henderson, P. (Editor). 1984. Rare earth element geochemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam; New York.
Herrmann, H., Nolde, J., Berger, S., and Heise, S. 2016. Aquatic ecotoxicity of lanthanum – a review and an attempt to derive water and sediment quality criteria. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 124: 213–238.
Hua, D., Wang, J., Yu, D., and Liu, J. 2017. Lanthanum exerts acute toxicity and histopathological changes in gill and liver tissue of rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus). Ecotoxicology 26(9): 1207–1215.
Joonas, E., Aruoja, V., Olli, K., Syvertsen-Wiig, G., Vija, H., and Kahru, A. 2017. Potency of (doped) rare earth oxide particles and their constituent metals to inhibit algal growth and induce direct toxic effects. Science of The Total Environment 593–594: 478–486.
Jreije, I., Hadioui, M., and Wilkinson, K.J. 2022. Sample preparation for the analysis of nanoparticles in natural waters by single particle ICP-MS. Talanta 238: 123060.
Kang, S., Guo, C., Ma, C., Mu, H., Liu, Z., and Sun, L. 2022. Assessment of the biotoxicity of lanthanides (La, Ce, Gd, and Ho) on zebrafish (Danio rerio) in different water environments. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 246: 114169.
King, M., Schwartz, M., and McGeer, J. 2005. Acute toxicity of rare earth metals using Daphnia pulex. [Unpublished]. Division Report, CANMET Mining and Mineral Sciences Laboratories.
Korotkov, S., Konovalova, S., Emelyanova, L., and Brailovskaya, I. 2014. Y3 +, La3 +, and some bivalent metals inhibited the opening of the Tl+-induced permeability transition pore in Ca2 +-loaded rat liver mitochondria. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 141: 1–9.
Lachaux, N., Catrouillet, C., Marsac, R., Poirier, L., Pain-Devin, S., Gross, E.M., and Giamberini, L. 2022a. Implications of speciation on rare earth element toxicity: A focus on organic matter influence in Daphnia magna standard test. Environmental Pollution 307: 119554.
Lachaux, N., Cossu-Leguille, C., Poirier, L., Gross, E.M., and Giamberini, L. 2022b. Integrated environmental risk assessment of rare earth elements mixture on aquatic ecosystems. Front. Environ. Sci. 10. Frontiers.
Liu, X., and Byrne, R.H. 1997. Rare earth and yttrium phosphate solubilities in aqueous solution. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 61(8): 1625–1633.
Lora-Benítez, A.J., Molina-López, A.M., Mora-Medina, R., Aguilar-Herrera, J.E., Ayala-Soldado, N., and Moyano-Salvago, R. 2024. Evaluation of acute toxicity of neodymium and yttrium in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Front. Environ. Sci. 12. Frontiers.
Lürling, M., and Tolman, Y. 2010. Effects of lanthanum and lanthanum-modified clay on growth, survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna. Water Research 44(1): 309–319.
Ma, Y., Wang, J., Peng, C., Ding, Y., He, X., Zhang, P., Li, N., Lan, T., Wang, D., Zhang, Z., Sun, F., Liao, H., and Zhang, Z. 2016. Toxicity of cerium and thorium on Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 134: 226–232.
MacMillan, G.A., Chételat, J., Heath, J.P., Mickpegak, R., and Amyot, M. 2017. Rare earth elements in freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems in the eastern Canadian Arctic. Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts 19(10): 1336–1345. The Royal Society of Chemistry.
MacMillan, G.A., Clayden, M.G., Chételat, J., Richardson, M.C., Ponton, D.E., Perron, T., and Amyot, M. 2019. Environmental drivers of rare earth element bioaccumulation in freshwater zooplankton. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53(3): 1650–1660. American Chemical Society.
Marang, L., Reiller, P.E., Eidner, S., Kumke, M.U., and Benedetti, M.F. 2008. Combining spectroscopic and potentiometric approaches to characterize competitive binding to humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42(14): 5094–5098. American Chemical Society.
Marginson, H., MacMillan, G.A., Grant, E., Gérin-Lajoie, J., and Amyot, M. 2023. Rare earth element bioaccumulation and cerium anomalies in biota from the Eastern Canadian subarctic (Nunavik). Science of The Total Environment 879: 163024.
Mehennaoui, K., Felten, V., Caillet, C., and Giamberini, L. 2024. Acute and chronic toxicity of rare earth elements-enriched sediments from a prospective mining area: effects on life history traits, behavioural and physiological responses of Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea Amphipoda). Chemosphere 364: 143117.
[MELCC] Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques. 2022. Banque de données sur la qualité du milieu aquatique (BQMA). Direction générale du suivi de l’état de l’environnement [accessed 24 May 2022]. (Available in French only)
Moermond, C.T.A., Tijink, J., van Wezel, A.P., and Koelmans, A.A. 2001. Distribution, speciation, and bioavailability of lanthanides in the Rhine-Meuse estuary, The Netherlands. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 20(9): 1916–1926.
[NRCan] Natural Resources Canada. 2016. Literature review of potential ecotoxicological effects arising from rare earth element (REE) processing. [Unpublished]. Report prepared by Golder Associates Ltd. for Natural Resources Canada, 555 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario.
[NRCan] Natural Resources Canada. 2017. Toxicity of rare earth elements to early life stages of fish: Lanthanum, neodymium, cerium and yttrium. [Unpublished]. Final Report prepared by Nautilus Environmental, Burnaby BC for Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON. June 23, 2017.
[NRCan] Natural Resources Canada. 2018. Toxicity of rare earth elements to Ceriodaphnia dubia, Hyalella azteca and Oncorhynhus kisutch: Lanthanum, neodymium, cerium and yttrium. [Unpublished]. Final Report prepared by Nautilus Environmental, Burnaby BC for Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON. May 11, 2018.
[NRCan] Natural Resources Canada. 2019a. Toxicity of rare earth elements in sediment exposure to Hyalella azteca and Chironomus dilutus: Lanthanum, neodymium, yttrium and cerium. [Unpublished]. Final Report prepared by Nautilus Environmental, Burnaby BC for Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON. November 25, 2019.
[NRCan] Natural Resources Canada. 2019b. Toxicity of rare earth elements to Chironomus dilutus, Neocloeon triangulifer and Sphaerium sp.: Lanthanum, neodymium, yttrium and cerium. [Unpublished]. Final Report prepared by Nautilus Environmental, Burnaby BC for Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON. November 28, 2019.
[NRCan] Natural Resources Canada. 2021a. Toxicity of rare earth elements to plants, algae and brown trout: results of toxicity tests with lanthanum, neodymium, yttrium and cerium. [Unpublished]. Final Report prepared by Nautilus Environmental, Burnaby BC for Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON. February 17, 2021.
[NRCan] Natural Resources Canada. 2021b. The fate of rare earth elements in aquatic toxicity tests. Solubility, speciation and bioaccumulation of lanthanum, neodymium, yttrium and cerium. [Unpublished]. Final Report prepared by Nautilus Environmental, Burnaby BC for Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON. July 22, 2021.
[NRCan] Natural Resources Canada. 2024. Rare earth elements facts. [Accessed 10 March 2025].
Nürnberg, G.K. 2017. Attempted management of cyanobacteria by Phoslock (lanthanum-modified clay) in Canadian lakes: water quality results and predictions. Lake and Reservoir Management 33(2): 163–170. Taylor & Francis.
Okamoto, A., Masunaga, S., and Tatarazako, N. 2021. Chronic toxicity of 50 metals to Ceriodaphnia dubia . J of Applied Toxicology 41(3): 375–386.
Piarulli, S., Hansen, B.H., Ciesielski, T., Zocher, A.-L., Malzahn, A., Olsvik, P.A., Sonne, C., Nordtug, T., Jenssen, B.M., Booth, A.M., and Farkas, J. 2021. Sources, distribution and effects of rare earth elements in the marine environment: current knowledge and research gaps. Environmental Pollution 291: 118230.
Piepgras, D.J., and Jacobsen, S.B. 1992. The behavior of rare earth elements in seawater: precise determination of variations in the North Pacific water column. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56(5): 1851–1862.
Pokrovsky, O.S., and Schott, J. 2002. Iron colloids/organic matter associated transport of major and trace elements in small boreal rivers and their estuaries (NW Russia). Chemical Geology 190(1): 141–179.
PubChem. 2024. Chemistry database. [Accessed 28 June 2024].
Railsback, B. 2012. An Earth scientist’s periodic table of the elements and their ions [PDF]. Department of Geology, University of Georgia [accessed 4 March 2025].
Reisman, D., Weber, R., McKernan, J., and Northeim, C. 2013. Rare earth elements: a review of production, processing, recycling, and associated environmental issues [PDF]. EPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.
Romero-Freire, A., Minguez, L., Pelletier, M., Cayer, A., Caillet, C., Devin, S., Gross, E.M., Guérold, F., Pain-Devin, S., Vignati, D.A.L., and Giamberini, L. 2018. Assessment of baseline ecotoxicity of sediments from a prospective mining area enriched in light rare earth elements. Science of The Total Environment 612: 831–839.
Shah, R. 2022. Toxicity of the technology critical elements germanium and yttrium to Daphnia magna and Hyalella azteca and the influence of toxicity modifying factors. Master of Science (MSc), Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON.
Sharma, P., Jha, A.B., and Dubey, R.S. 2024. Addressing lanthanum toxicity in plants: sources, uptake, accumulation, and mitigation strategies. Science of The Total Environment 929: 172560.
Sholkovitz, E.R. 1992. Chemical evolution of rare earth elements: fractionation between colloidal and solution phases of filtered river water. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 114(1): 77–84.
Shu, J., Chen, W., Wang, Z., Jiang, D., Xiao, Y., and Li, Z. 2023. Two-phase effects of environmentally relevant lanthanum on life-history traits of Daphnia magna and transgenerational bioenergetic profiles: implications for nutritional and environmental consequences. Aquatic Toxicology 255: 106380.
Sneller, F.E.C., Kalf, D.F., Weltje, L., and Van Wezel, A.P. 2000. Maximum permissible concentrations and negligible concentrations for rare earth elements (REEs). RIVM Report, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Stauber, J.L., and Binet, M.T. 2000. Canning River Phoslock field trial - Ecotoxicity testing final report. [Unpublished]. Center for Advanced Analytical Chemistry (CSIRO).
Stronkhorst, J., and E.M.L. Yland. 1998. De biologische beschikbaarheid van zeldzame aardmetalen in Nieuwe Maas-sediment voor de Slijkgarnaal Coropium volutator. RIKZ-werkdocument AB-98. 103x. (In dutch).
Sutorius, M., Mori, C., Greskowiak, J., Boettcher, L., Bunse, C., Dittmar, T., Dlugosch, L., Hintz, N.H., Simon, M., Striebel, M., and Pahnke, K. 2022. Rare earth element behaviour in seawater under the influence of organic matter cycling during a phytoplankton spring bloom – a mesocosm study. Front. Mar. Sci. 9. Frontiers.
Tan, Q., Li, J., and Zeng, X. 2015. Rare earth elements recovery from waste fluorescent lamps: A review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 45(7): 749–776. Taylor & Francis.
Tang, J., and Johannesson, K.H. 2003. Speciation of rare earth elements in natural terrestrial waters: assessing the role of dissolved organic matter from the modeling approach. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 67(13): 2321–2339.
Thorley, J., and Schwarz, C. 2018. ssdtools: an R package to fit species sensitivity distributions. Journal of Open Source Software 3(31): 1082.
Trifuoggi, M., Pagano, G., Guida, M., Palumbo, A., Siciliano, A., Gravina, M., Lyons, D.M., Burić, P., Levak, M., Thomas, P.J., Giarra, A., and Oral, R. 2017. Comparative toxicity of seven rare earth elements in sea urchin early life stages. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(25): 20803–20810.
Vignati, D.A.L., Martin, L.A., Poirier, L., Zalouk-Vergnoux, A., Fouque, C., Bojic, C., Hissler, C., and Cossu-Leguille, C. 2024. Ecotoxicity of lanthanides to Daphnia magna: insights from elemental behavior and speciation in a standardized test medium. Peer Community Journal 4.
Vukov, O., Smith, D.S., and McGeer, J.C. 2016. Acute dysprosium toxicity to Daphnia pulex and Hyalella azteca and development of the biotic ligand approach. Aquatic Toxicology 170: 142–151.
Wang, Y., Zhang, M., and Wang, X. 2000. Population growth responses of Tetrahymena shanghaiensis in exposure to rare earth elements. BTER 75(1–3): 265–275. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
Wells, W.H., and Wells, V.L. 2012. The lanthanides, rare earth elements. In Patty’s Toxicology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 817–840.
Weltje, L., Brouwer, A.H., Verburg, T.G., Wolterbeek, H.Th., and de Goeij, J.J.M. 2002a. Accumulation and elimination of lanthanum by duckweed (Lemna minor L.) as influenced by organism growth and lanthanum sorption to glass. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21(7): 1483–1489.
Weltje, L., Heidenreich, H., Zhu, W., Wolterbeek, H.Th., Korhammer, S., de Goeij, J.J.M., and Markert, B. 2002b. Lanthanide concentrations in freshwater plants and molluscs, related to those in surface water, pore water and sediment. a case study in The Netherlands. Science of The Total Environment 286(1): 191–214.
Xu, T., Zhang, M., Hu, J., Li, Z., Wu, T., Bao, J., Wu, S., Lei, L., and He, D. 2017. Behavioral deficits and neural damage of Caenorhabditis elegans induced by three rare earth elements. Chemosphere 181: 55–62.
Yang, G., Tan, Q., Zhu, L., and Wilkinson, K.J. 2014. The role of complexation and competition in the biouptake of europium by a unicellular alga. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 33(11): 2609–2615.
Yang, J., and Haley, B. 2016. The profile of the rare earth elements in the Canada Basin, Arctic Ocean. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 17(8): 3241–3253.
Zhang, K., Zhang, R., Liu, S., Li, Y., Guo, G., Li, H., and Shao, S. 2024. Acute toxicity of cerium to neonatal Daphnia magna: responses of antioxidant systems, influence of environmental factors and development of a biotic ligand model. Science of The Total Environment 917: 170441.
Zhao, C.-M., and Wilkinson, K.J. 2015. Biotic ligand model does not predict the bioavailability of rare earth elements in the presence of organic ligands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(4): 2207–2214. American Chemical Society.
Zilber, L., Parlanti, E., and Fortin, C. 2024. Impact of organic matter of different origins on lanthanum speciation, bioavailability and toxicity toward a green alga. Front. Environ. Chem. 5. Frontiers.
List of acronyms and abbreviations
- AICc
-
Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size
- BAF
-
bioaccumulation factor
- BC EMS
-
British Columbia Environmental Monitoring System
- BCF
-
bioconcentration factor
- BQMA
-
Banque de données sur la Qualité du Milieu Aquatique
- CAS RN
-
Chemical Abstracts Service registry number
- CCME
-
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment
- CEPA
-
Canadian Environmental Protection Act
- CETIS
-
Comprehensive Environmental Toxicity Information System
- CMP
-
Chemicals Management Plan
- CREEN
-
Canadian Rare Earth Elements Network
- DOM
-
dissolved organic matter
- dw
-
dry weight
- ECCC
-
Environment and Climate Change Canada
- ECx
-
effect concentration to x% of test species
- ECHA
-
European Chemicals Agency
- FEQG
-
Federal Environmental Quality Guideline
- FSeQG
-
Federal Sediment Quality Guideline
- FWQG
-
Federal Water Quality Guideline
- GC
-
Government of Canada
- GM
-
geometric mean
- HC5
-
hazard concentration at the 5th percentile
- HREE
-
heavy rare earth elements
- ICx
-
concentration that causes x% inhibition in test species
- LCD
-
liquid-crystal display
- LCx
-
lethal concentration to x% of test species
- Log Kp(sed/wat)
-
Sediment-water partition coefficient
- LOEC
-
lowest observed effect concentration
- LREE
-
light rare earth elements
- MATC
-
maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (geometric mean of the NOEC and LOEC)
- MELCC
-
Ministère de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques
- MITE
-
Metals in the Environment
- NLTWQM
-
National Long Term Water Quality Monitoring
- NOEC
-
no observed effect concentration
- NRCan
-
Natural Resources Canada
- NSTP
-
National Status and Trends Program
- OC
-
organic carbon
- REACH
-
Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals
- REE
-
rare earth elements
- RSS
-
robust study summary
- SSD
-
species sensitivity distribution
- SSTT
-
Spiked-Sediment Toxicity Test
- TMF
-
toxicity modifying factor
- ww
-
wet weight
