AI Strategy for the Federal Public Service 2025-2027: Full-text

On this page:

Overview

In this section:

Why an AI Strategy?

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents unprecedented and wide-ranging opportunities to enhance the public service and the services it offers Canadians. AI can unlock capabilities beyond human limits, opening doors to new ways of working and operating. With AI, we can create new types of services to better meet the needs of those we serve and improve the quality and efficiency of services already offered.

AI can streamline or automate routine tasks for public servants, freeing them to focus on more complex and critical work. It can increase the public service’s efficiency, effectiveness and productivity, maximizing its value to Canadians. It can improve the speed and scale of data and information analysis far beyond what was once possible, leading to faster, more informed decision making and scientific discovery. It can also create new avenues for public engagement and help us protect Canada’s interests by enhancing our ability to protect our IT and physical infrastructure.

AI is not new to the Government of Canada: departments have been using it for decades. Often developed in-house, early AI applications typically served very specific purposes and were used only by specialist staff. Over the past few years, however, AI capabilities have advanced rapidly, particularly in the field of generative AI. These capabilities are now embedded in a wide range of commercial software, making them more accessible to all public servants.

Learn more about: AI in the Government of Canada

Below are some examples of how AI is being used to improve the work of the Government of Canada.

Case processing: Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada’s Advanced Analytics Solutions Centre

The Advanced Analytics Solutions Centre at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada has been using AI-based models to triage applications for temporary and permanent residence and find those which can be automatically identified as eligible. These models have been used to accelerate the processing of more than 7 million routine cases, allowing case officers to focus on more complex cases, and to strengthen program integrity by identifying fraud patterns.

Serving clients: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s AgPal

 AgPal helps farmers and agri-businesses find information about over 400 federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal programs and services, along with market intelligence and research. Its generative AI tool, AgPal Chat, helps users find relevant funding and resources faster, supporting the sustainable growth and competitiveness of the sector.

Supporting public servants: The Public Services and Procurement Canada Human Capital Management AI Virtual Assistant

Human Capital Management AI Virtual Assistant is designed to support Pay Centre compensation advisors in processing pay cases from the backlog. The assistant automates routine tasks, allowing advisors to focus on complex cases and expedite resolutions. By shifting from manual to digital processes, it enhances efficiency, reduces workload, and minimizes errors.

Conducting research: Statistics Canada

Statistics Canada works with provinces and territories to collect data for the Canadian Coroner and Medical Examiner Database and organize the collected data into coherent datasets. Analysts can then assess the datasets for patterns of death over time, detecting trends to understand growing hazards to public health.

Transcribing and summarizing: Innovation, Science, Economic Development Canada’s (ISED) AI Accelerator

ISED developed a tool for its Parliamentary Affairs Unit that uses AI and open data to transcribe and summarize parliamentary committee meetings. By reducing manual notetaking, it frees Parliamentary Affairs Officers to dedicate more of their skills to analysis and interpretation, improving efficiency and employee well-being by cutting down on overtime.

Increasing productivity: Shared Services Canada (SSC)

SSC is piloting its multilingual conversational chatbot CANChat as an in-house alternative to commercial generative AI tools. CANChat can support drafting, editing, researching, summarizing, and information and data management and analysis. For greater data security and privacy, CANChat ensures that all data is safeguarded and stored in Canada, and that prompts are not used to train its AI.

Securing networks: The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security’s Assemblyline tool

The Assemblyline tool works to defend federal and critical infrastructure systems from cyber threats involves detecting patterns in vast quantities of data—something AI tools are ideally suited to. Since 2017, its Assemblyline tool has used machine learning to analyze malicious software, scanning over 1 billion files a year for over 300 Government of Canada and critical infrastructure organizations

Securing borders: Transport Canada’s Pre-load Air Cargo Targeting (PACT) program

The PACT uses AI to screen inbound air shipments before takeoff to flag those that could contain concealed explosives or other threats. The use of AI has enabled a tenfold increase in the number of shipments screened per hour and increased coverage from 6 percent to 100 percent of flights, greatly increasing safety on both passenger and cargo flights.

These advances have also greatly increased the risks of AI and the challenges of managing them. They have heightened the potential for AI to overturn traditional ways of working in the public service and have increased public scrutiny of government use of AI. Beyond ethical and security concerns, challenges such as talent shortages, infrastructure gaps, technological sovereignty, and interdepartmental collaboration further complicate AI adoption. Existing and future AI systems must therefore be appropriately governed, with guidance, policy, and training in place to manage risk, address challenges, and uphold human rights, public trust, and national security. At the same time, there are real risks and opportunity costs if we fail to adapt to these new technologies.

The Government of Canada needs an AI strategy to ensure that its AI adoption and use:

  • Is aligned with the government’s values and ethics, objectives, and mandate to serve Canadians
  • Prioritizes uses that will meet the needs of and deliver the greatest benefits to public servants and those they serve
  • Is developed efficiently and collaboratively with internal and external partners
  • Is responsible, safe, and secure, mitigating threats, risks, and harms to people and the environment

Vision

By responsibly adopting AI, the Government of Canada ​can deliver world-class services to its clients, protect our people and interests, achieve a more innovative and efficient workplace, and accelerate scientific discovery for the benefit of all.

Principles

Human centred

We focus on the needs of those we serve and the public servants who serve them in deciding where we adopt AI and how we integrate it into our work.

Collaborative

We work together on AI adoption with Indigenous and Canadian partners, other Canadian and international jurisdictions, and our public service colleagues.

Ready

We have the data, infrastructure, tools, culture, talent, skills and policy we need for responsible, safe, secure, and successful AI adoption.

Responsible

We inform clients and public servants when and how we use AI so that they trust that our use of AI respects privacy and is justified, responsible, fair, safe, and secure.

Scope

Many different definitions for AI exist, including the definition in the Government of Canada’s Directive on Automated Decision-Making. One of the most widely accepted definitions comes from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which defines an AI system as:

a machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.

AI includes:

  • Both knowledge-based systems that use a combination of domain knowledge, rules, facts, and relationships curated by human experts and machine learning systems that that can learn from data and generalize to perform tasks without explicit instructions.
  • Application areas such as computer vision, natural language processing, speech recognition, intelligent decision support systems, and intelligent robotic systems.

This current strategy applies to all types of AI technologies with adaptive capabilities after initial training:

  • At any stage of the AI lifecycle, from design, development, deployment, and operation to system decommissioning.
  • In use for any purpose in any department or agency covered by the Policy on Service and Digital, including those used by external subcontractors. Organizations that are partially or wholly exempt from the Policy on Service and Digital, including those that fall under the national security exemption, are encouraged to comply with the AI Strategy as far as possible as a matter of good practice.
  • Whether they are developed within the Government of Canada, open source, commercial off-the-shelf products, or custom vendor solutions.

The AI Strategy excludes:

  • Systems that only use software-based solutions without adaptive capabilities after initial training
  • The adoption of AI by organizations outside the Government of Canada.

Learn more about: How we used AI in developing this Strategy

The team responsible for the development of the AI Strategy used an approved generative AI tool (Microsoft Copilot) and some Microsoft Teams AI capabilities to support the work of its members.
AI was used during development to:

  • Automatically transcribe some discussions
  • Summarize and group comments and feedback
  • Generate meeting invitation text
  • Scan and summarize research
  • Translate small pieces of text
  • Draft and edit reports and discussion papers

All uses of AI were consistent with TBS policy and guidance. Any personal identifiers, such as individual or organization names, were removed before AI use. Products generated by AI were reviewed by human analysts and were labelled to indicate that AI had been used in their development.

In total, these uses of AI saved analysts approximately three weeks’ work during the development process, enabling the team to allow more time for engagement and consultation.

For more information, please see Guide on the use of generative artificial intelligence - Canada.ca

Foreword from the President, Chief Information Officer and Chief Data Officer

Message from the President

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize the way Canadians interact with the Government of Canada. By using AI responsibly to modernize government operations, we can unlock new ways to increase productivity, efficiency and effectiveness, while reducing response and wait times. We can make it easier for Canadians and Canadian businesses to access all of the services, information, and opportunities the Government of Canada has to offer.

While the adoption of AI for its innovative applications is becoming the emerging norm worldwide, we must ensure its responsible use by assessing and mitigating the risks. This means addressing bias and preventing misinformation, protecting the privacy and security of Canadians, and ensuring that the benefits of AI do not come at the expense of our environment or our workforce. AI is simply a tool, not a replacement for public servants, as we look to modernize government operations to meet the needs of Canadians in the digital 21st century.

The Government of Canada’s first-ever AI Strategy for the federal public service will allow us to seize the opportunities of innovative technology while establishing guardrails to protect our systems. In developing this Strategy, we engaged the public, partners and stakeholders. Participation from citizens was central to ensuring a Strategy for the public service that reflects the very democratic values we prioritize today.

As we implement the Strategy across the public service, our work will continue to focus on the needs and expectations of those we serve. This means making sure Canadians are involved in the design of services that use AI. This is especially important for those who may face barriers to access, such as persons with disabilities and members of equity-deserving groups. We will also rely on the expertise of Canadian innovators and businesses that are already global leaders in AI.

The AI Strategy for the federal public service establishes a robust AI governance framework to ensure the transparent and responsible use of AI. Ultimately, Canadians need to have confidence in how government uses this technology. Trust is built by being upfront and open about the use of AI, and that is central to the success of the AI Strategy.

To learn more about how the Government of Canada plans to harness the potential of AI responsibly and for the benefit of all Canadians, I invite you to read the full Strategy.

The Honourable Ginette Petitpas Taylor, P.C., M.P.
President of the Treasury Board

Message from the Chief Information Officer and Chief Data Officer

We are pleased to present the AI Strategy for the Federal Public Service 2025–2027, our plan for the responsible, secure, and accelerated adoption of AI in the public service.

AI is a transformative force. It can enhance the capabilities of public servants and change how we work and what we do. Adopting it in the workplace can improve our operational efficiency by automating certain repetitive manual processes and allowing employees to focus on more complex and strategic work, such as supporting decision-making and improving collaboration.

The AI Strategy lays out a plan for how we move forward with AI. It highlights the importance of coordinating approaches across federal organizations, learning from our collective experiences, and supporting organizations of all sizes and maturity as they explore this technology. It sets out the role of public service leaders in adapting AI to their organizations’ mandates, ensuring strong data foundations for future AI projects, and adopting more agile practices for development and procurement.

The responsible adoption of AI will require culture change within our organizations. The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat will encourage departments to give employees the time, space, support, and tools to explore its use, grow from setbacks, and collaborate with partners, both internal and external to government.

Implemented together with the Government of Canada’s Data Strategy, the AI Strategy will help maximize the effectiveness and value of data and AI investments across government, delivering benefits for service delivery, science and research, security, and corporate processes.

We encourage all federal organizations to embrace AI responsibly to meet the expectations of all Canadians for secure and modern government operations in the digital age.

Dominic Rochon
Chief Information Officer of Canada

Stephen Burt
Chief Data Officer of Canada

Priority areas

Canada’s AI Strategy for the Federal Public Service focuses on four priority areas:

These priorities were developed in collaboration with a working group of departments that have responsibilities for AI policy or implementation. They were discussed throughout our consultation with partners, stakeholders and the public and in policy consultations across the Government of Canada. They address what we heard as the most pressing needs to advance responsible adoption of AI across the Government of Canada.

Each of these priorities has a set of accompanying actions. These have been chosen because they are concrete, can be achieved or initiated within the AI Strategy’s two-year timeline, and have the greatest potential to advance responsible AI adoption within the public service. These actions include both ongoing and new work. Some will build on work already begun, or scale innovations and emerging best practices. Others are new actions to respond to emerging needs and known barriers that must be addressed if AI adoption is to succeed.

These priorities and the associated actions reflect the time when the AI Strategy was developed. Because the future pace and direction of AI development is highly uncertain, what we and our partners, stakeholders, and clients identify as priorities may be very different at the end of the Strategy’s lifespan.

To remain relevant in this rapidly changing landscape, the AI Strategy and its implementation plan will be reviewed frequently and will be renewed in 2027. Progress on implementation will be reported on a quarterly tracker. In this way we will model the agility needed for AI adoption, adapting our priorities to meet new needs while continuing to collaborate with users and engage those we serve.

Priority 1: Central AI capacity

A common theme heard from government departments during consultations was a need for a central hub to support project implementation and share knowledge. AI accelerators or specialist technical teams able to support project teams with technical development are increasingly being established within departments. However, there is an unmet need for guidance on many other aspects of AI implementation. These include identifying use cases, evaluating data readiness, assessing risk, determining whether to build or buy solutions, and navigating assessment, governance, and procurement processes. Departments also commonly expressed a need for a convenor to share knowledge, code, scalable tools, and lessons learned from departmental experience.

Learn more about: AI Accelerators in the Government of Canada

Over the past decade, more and more Government of Canada departments have established their own AI accelerators or centres of expertise to promote departmental adoption. Some examples of these include:

National Research Council’s (NRC) AI Accelerator and Digital Technologies programs

The NRC has promoted AI adoption across federal departments and agencies through its AI Accelerator and Digital Technologies programs, completing over 100 projects in the past five years. These initiatives span national security, digital privacy, digital health, scientific discovery, logistics, geospatial analytics, and Indigenous languages, improving public services, productivity, and situational awareness. With over 110 AI specialists and access to advanced computation facilities and global partnerships, the NRC supports and enhances AI initiatives across the Government of Canada, driving innovation and adoption for a more secure and technologically advanced nation.

Shared Services Canada’s Artificial Intelligence (AI) Program and AI Centre of Excellence (AICoE)

The AI Program and the AICoE Incubate AI use cases, promote the use of AI, break down silos and foster digital innovation. Established in 2019, the AI Program has incubated more than 15 use cases, including CANChat. The AI CoE supports Government of Canada exploration of AI and intelligent automation, providing a central repository for sharing best practices, training materials, and strategic guidance. It convenes AI and intelligent automation working groups to explore challenges and identify opportunities and solutions to accelerate responsible adoption. The AI CoE also provides guidance to departments embarking on AI adoption and contributes to Algorithmic Impact Assessment peer review and the development of policy.

Natural Resources Canada's Digital Accelerator

NRCan works with scientists, economists and researchers to pilot advanced solutions and tools, including AI, strengthen digital expertise and literacy in the department and sector, and future-proof the department and its partners. Its projects include platforms or tools for accelerated materials discovery, mineral detection, industrial systems performance optimization, and grid optimization for electric vehicles.

Key actions

Establish an AI Centre of Expertise for the Government of Canada

The AI Centre of Expertise (AI CoE) will complement services offered by existing accelerators and centres, focusing on project support, knowledge sharing, and strategic guidance to support AI adoption and experimentation. It will provide project guidance, advise on common processes, and share best practice, experience, knowledge and code. It will also encourage interdepartmental or whole-of-government collaboration on solutions for common needs. The AI CoE will help business teams to:

  • Identify high-value use cases for AI integration. This may include helping departments evaluate factors like task and data suitability; infrastructure, model, and data requirements and limitations; cost/benefit analysis; privacy, accessibility, environmental, and equity considerations; risk identification, evaluation, and mitigation; workforce impacts; and how to evaluate project success against objectives.
  • Support data readiness: This would include supporting the implementation of the 2023-2026 Data Strategy for the Federal Public Service as a critical enabler for AI adoption. The AI CoE could advise departments on preparing their data for AI use or training and identifying Government of Canada datasets that could be combined to enable AI.
  • Support with procurement, governance, assessments, review processes, and other requirements. This would include providing guidance on options for procurement; algorithmic, accessibility, language, privacy, and environmental impact assessments; transparency, reporting, ethics, bias, peer review, GBA Plus analysis, and Indigenous Data Sovereignty requirements; securing AI and understanding risks; and processes for explanation and recourse. It will also include providing input into the development of a governance framework (see Priority 2) and the creation of standard language to inform vendors of their role in responsible AI adoption.

In addition to supporting project teams, the AI CoE will act as:

  • A convenor for government-wide knowledge sharing. It will share successful initiatives to prevent duplication of effort, maximize return on investment, and promote awareness and adoption of existing approved solutions. This will include sharing government-developed code and solutions, project documentation, information, policy, and instruments; soliciting feedback, use cases, and lessons learned from departments; and encouraging the scaling of successful projects. It will also work with the Canada School of Public Service (CSPS) to identify and promote training priorities and provide input into new policy or procurement vehicles.
  • An accelerator for AI solutions to meet common Government of Canada needs. Working with departments, the AI CoE will identify potential solutions that meet government-wide needs that could be broadly scaled and support their development.
  • A monitor of progress on AI adoption. The AI CoE will develop frameworks for progress and impact of Government of Canada AI adoption that can be used to benchmark, monitor, and report on the progress and compliance with policy and standards.

Enable common infrastructure

The Government of Canada and departments will ensure the provision of common infrastructure to enable AI adoption and will promote the adoption of existing approved enterprise solutions. This includes:

  • high-performance computing (HPC) and cloud infrastructure that is available, secure, and scalable to meet the demands of AI projects. 
  • common data and information management systems and practices to support sharing, scaling, and agentic capabilities across Government of Canada platforms.
  • access to approved models, services, and application programming interfaces (APIs) within common Government of Canada cloud platforms to build or deploy systems.
  • access to common AI solutions and capabilities in vendor solutions through a standard Government of Canada platform service.

Where possible, they will support Canadian suppliers and vendors in order to promote the growth of the Canadian AI industry and ensure secure sovereign infrastructure and solutions.

Identify and develop a lighthouse project

This project will be either a new initiative or one currently at pilot stage that would meet an enterprise-wide need and could be readily scaled. Its development, testing, and delivery will be undertaken collaboratively by the AI CoE and lead department. It will serve as:

  • A test case to identify barriers and project teams’ needs for support during development and obstacles to subsequent customization and scaling.
  • A pilot for the development of government-wide governance processes (see Priority 2 ).
  • An opportunity to develop templates and examples of project documentation.
  • A demonstration of the value of AI use cases.

Learn more about: The lighthouse project

The Strategy proposes the development of a lighthouse project that would both meet an enterprise-wide need and provide an opportunity to develop and test Government of Canada governance and support processes for AI adoption.

As its first lighthouse project, TBS will work with the Translation Bureau at Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) to scale its self-serve language hub pilot across the Government of Canada.

The Translation Bureau has developed a self-serve language hub pilot to provide PSPC employees with access to a variety of secure, real-time AI-driven language tools, trained with Canadian data. These include automated translation tools that can be used to provide instant translations of low-risk and low-value documents. The service operates in a secure cloud up to Protected B, with all data centralized within the Bureau and housed in Canada.

For users, this would provide a secure and approved one-stop shop for linguistic needs. For the Government, availability of an approved automated tool would reduce translation costs without compromising data security or sovereignty or product quality. Use of the Translation Bureau’s repository of 8 billion words (2 TB) to train the model would ensure a high level of consistency, quality, and customization to the specificities of Canadian culture, identity and realities.

Priority 2: Policy, legislation, and governance

Responsible AI adoption needs clear, up-to-date legislation and policy. Together, they mark out not only the necessary guardrails for identifying and mitigating risk, but also the space within which developers are free to experiment and innovate. Clear legislation and policy help to build public trust, overcome institutional resistance to AI innovation and enable governments to move further and faster.

As in many jurisdictions, some Canadian legislation and federal policy has not been revised for the AI era. Some law or policy is silent on areas needed to govern AI, while others may introduce unintended bias in data collection or obstruct AI adoption unnecessarily and unintentionally. Incremental development has created a patchwork of policies that are difficult for AI project teams to understand and navigate, and no common model for AI governance yet exists within the Government of Canada. These challenges must be addressed to build public confidence in the Government of Canada’s ability to deliver AI-enabled services.

Learn more about: AI-ready law and policy

Policy, law, and regulations must support the use of AI and must be kept updated to ensure that they remain relevant and effective as technology evolves. In response, the Government of Canada and leading jurisdictions worldwide have begun to incorporate commitments to scheduled review cycles into key laws and policy instruments, a new best practice that should be more widely adopted.

  • The Government of Canada’s Directive on Automated Decision-Making and associated Algorithmic Impact Assessment tool are reviewed every two years. 
  • Amendments made in 2019 to the Access to Information Act include a 5-year review cycle.
  • The EU AI Act includes provisions for an annual review of both its list of high-risk AI systems and the AI practices it prohibits.

Even without a specified review cycle, other jurisdictions regularly review and amend key legislation and policy:

  • Australia has conducted regular reviews of its Privacy Act 1988 to address emerging privacy issues and technological developments, with four major reviews since its enactment.
  • The EU regularly reviews its General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other technology-related laws to adapt to new technological advancements and challenges.

Lastly, some jurisdictions have developed guidance to ensure that all new legislation supports new technologies by design.

  • Denmark’s digital-ready legislation program has established mandatory assessment against seven principles for digitally-ready legislation to ensure that new laws and regulations are compatible with digital technologies and can be efficiently administered using digital tools.

Key actions

Establish common AI governance and risk management frameworks

Drawing on international and Government of Canada best practice, the Government of Canada will establish common governance and risk management frameworks for the AI lifecycle to provide clear guidance to AI project teams. These frameworks will balance risk with the pace required for innovation; be scaled to system risk, sensitivity, and impact; and will be designed to adapt as technology changes. They will address potential risks associated with AI use, such as data privacy and security, bias detection and mitigation, model interpretability and explainability, environmental impact, and human involvement. The frameworks will incorporate Canadian requirements, such as the need to advance Indigenous Data Sovereignty and provide technologies in both official languages. They will also lay out the security, trust, and reliability controls necessary to ensure the continued maintenance and resilience of these systems, including system shutdown measures to respond to emergencies. This work will support ongoing efforts to harmonize data standards, increase interoperability, and support other enablers.

In addition, it will include a government-wide governance structure responsible for implementing the governance framework. This will include an AI ethics review board responsible for providing guidance on responsible AI and for evaluating higher risk and impact projects at key stages of the project lifecycle. The governance structure will make use of existing Government of Canada governance bodies and organizations such as the Canada AI Safety Institute wherever possible. In addition to providing project governance, these bodies and organizations will help identify high-value AI use cases, regularly reprioritize the AI Strategy's actions, and prioritize and oversee the AI Strategy's implementation.

Address policy and legislative alignment, gaps, and barriers

The Government of Canada will review and propose changes to instruments that create unnecessary obstacles to AI adoption. It will fill identified policy gaps, such as clarifying the responsibilities of chief information, data and privacy officers for AI adoption, and the acceptable use of AI by outside organizations in their interactions with the Government of Canada. It will also address legal and policy ambiguities related to privacy and training data and the application of the national security exemption. The Government of Canada will update procurement policies, instruments and processes to make them more responsive to pace and requirements of AI procurement. It will also consider ways in which the Government of Canada can better align internal AI policy with the Pan Canadian AI Strategy to support the Canadian AI sector, with the United Nations Declaration Act commitments to Indigenous Data Sovereignty, and with international treaties, legislation and norms.

This work will lead to the development of clear and concrete commitments to revise specific instruments within a set timeline, and an agile process to review and update policy, guidance, tools and resources to respond to technological, legislative and social change. The Government of Canada will also review the policy landscape for opportunities to synthesize or interpret existing policy to increase usability.

Adopt a “think AI” approach

The Government of Canada will optimize its AI adoption by embedding a “think AI” approach to its policies, programs and services. The intent is not to adopt AI at all costs or in contexts where its use would not be responsible or useful. Rather, the goal is to challenge departments to identify key business problems that could be transformed using AI, consider AI options before defaulting to traditional IT or HR approaches, and make planned investments in AI and its enablers.

To support this, the Government of Canada will require departments to:

  • Identify three areas, programs or services with business problems that have a high potential to be solved using AI.
  • Consider solutions and resourcing requirements for AI and its enablers at the outset of initiatives. This will include changes to Treasury Board submissions, Memoranda to Cabinet, and budget and off-cycle funding proposals to incorporate data, AI, compute, and other relevant requirements.
  • Prioritize AI infrastructure and secure adoption in departmental integrated IT planning processes.
  • Develop their own AI strategies to ensure alignment and effective use of resources.

Priority 3: Talent and training

To adopt AI responsibly, we need people with the right technical and non-technical skills. Although Canada is a global leader in AI research, demand for AI skills significantly outpaces supply. Within the Government of Canada, there is a 30% vacancy rate for digital roles, threatening delivery and leading to a costly dependence on external contractors. As it plans for increased AI adoption, the Government of Canada must consider how it will meet its AI talent needs through training, upskilling, and recruitment so that it can optimize its use of AI to serve Canadians better.

Key actions

Develop a training plan

Building on existing offerings from CSPS, the Government of Canada will develop a training plan for existing public servants. The developed training plan will be evergreen to match the pace of AI development. Through this plan, the Government of Canada will consider ways that AI may reshape the workforce, working with employees and their bargaining agents to prepare public servants for this change through retraining.

The training plan will incorporate both general training and training tailored to specific personas with varying roles, levels and responsibilities. The general training will be directed at increasing understanding of and confidence in using AI, including embedded AI capabilities; developing skills associated with responsible, secure, and effective use, including effective prompt engineering; and establishing leadership programs to achieve a culture that promotes AI adoption. The tailored training will address both more specific and advanced technical skills, and the behavioural skills needed for successful adoption, such risk identification and management, and effective leadership of AI projects and teams.

Benchmark talent needs

The Government of Canada will benchmark both talent requirements for AI and its employees’ existing AI knowledge and skills across the enterprise. These benchmarks will enable the development of learner personas with accompanying training plans and identify employees who could be offered further training.

Develop a talent plan

Since not all talent needs can be met through training, the Government of Canada will need to develop a plan to recruit and retain talent. This plan will explore obstacles to recruitment and retention and ways to establish flexible data science career pathways for AI practitioners. It will also consider ways to expand interchanges, apprenticeships, co-op programs, and partnerships with AI institutes and research centres to create a talent pipeline. It will consider ways to make efficient use of AI talent through flexible assignments, and competitions and challenges to meet some project-based needs.

Learn more about: AI and data talent pathways

To meet the challenge of AI talent needs, both departmental and government-wide initiatives are being developed to improve recruitment, retention, and reskilling:

Digital Talent Strategy and Platform:

The Government of Canada is committed to strengthening AI talent and adoption through the Government of Canada Digital Talent Strategy. Its targeted initiatives include centralized AI-specific recruitment campaigns for data science graduates and the Digital Talent Platform, which simplifies the application process for individuals looking for digital careers in the Government of Canada and helps managers to find pre-qualified digital talent that matches their needs. The Strategy also focuses on developing and retaining AI talent through learning platforms, training opportunities, and partnerships with educational institutions and the Canada School of Public Service.

Training:

CSPS offers a range of courses, events, and resources on AI designed to provide users with a grounding in the knowledge and skills needed for successful and responsible use. These include a data and AI learning pathway, courses, job aids, articles, and videos, and an AI event series.

Co-op programs and internships:

Co-op programs are widely used by the Government of Canada as a source of new talent but have also been reimagined to support specific AI initiatives. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada established an AI talent pipeline with three post-secondary institutions. Through it, AAFC hired 13 co-op students in 2023-24 and supported in-class projects with the institutions. From this partnership, students received course credit and employment experience, while AAFC received an AI model, with ownership of both IP and data. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Employment and Social Development Canada, Natural Resources Canada, and Statistics Canada have become partners with Mila, offering opportunities to recruit Mila students for internships or post-graduation roles.

Priority 4: Engagement, transparency, and value to Canadians

Despite the increasing use of AI in Canada, levels of mistrust in AI and its use are high. In public consultations on the AI Strategy, participants expressed a desire for more engagement in the process of designing and developing government AI systems, especially by those more greatly impacted by algorithmic bias or barriers to access. They asked for greater transparency about the government’s AI use through labelling of AI-generated products and information on systems in use, and for information about ways to seek explanations or recourse for decisions.

Key actions

Strengthen accountability and transparency on AI use

The Government of Canada will continue to strengthen and clarify accountabilities for AI use in policy and in notifications about AI use. These will include new requirements and standard language for the disclosure of AI use, explanations of how an AI system reaches a decision, and information about rights and protections, including how to seek explanations or recourse and how to report problems. Lastly, the Government of Canada will identify those AI capabilities that it will not pursue.

As part of these efforts, the Government of Canada will prioritize the establishment of a public register of its AI systems. The register will include information about all AI systems that fall within a defined scope, drawing wherever possible on information already collected through Algorithmic Impact Assessments and Personal Information Banks. The scope of the register will be defined and publicized on the register itself and will follow best practice for registers in other jurisdictions, which exclude embedded AI systems and any systems covered by specific policy prohibiting publication. The register will include information about what and how data is being used, how it was trained, and what quality assurance and privacy and security measures are in place. Where information about systems cannot be published, the Government of Canada will develop and publish alternative oversight processes.

Demonstrate impact and value to Canadians

To ensure good stewardship of public resources, the Government of Canada will develop metrics and performance indicators to demonstrate the impact and value of AI initiatives to those we serve. This will track both the cost-effectiveness and cost-efficiency of AI projects through a range of financial and non-monetary metrics, including costs of implementation, efficiencies and cost savings achieved, service improvements, increased client satisfaction, or increased program uptake.

The Government of Canada will also develop a framework to track AI adoption. This framework will incorporate metrics for the deployment of AI solutions overall, but also for metrics such as collaboration, sharing, or scaling of solutions to avoid duplication of effort, maximize investment, and reduce costs. The metrics will also track departmental investments in the enablers of AI, including data, infrastructure, and talent.

Commit to engagement on AI

In keeping with its commitments to meaningful public engagement through the Directive on Open Government, and with the duty to consult, the Government of Canada commits to early and meaningful public and stakeholder engagement on AI initiatives of significant public interest or concern. This will include targeted engagement of communities that face greater impacts, risks or barriers from AI systems and union and employee engagement on workforce impacts. It will also include client participation in system design to ensure that AI systems do not create or perpetuate barriers to access for clients. The Government of Canada will also provide mechanisms for ongoing public feedback and questions on AI used by the federal government.

Learn more about: Public AI registers

Public AI registers are standardized, searchable databases that document the decisions, assumptions, and processes involved in the lifecycle of AI algorithms used by government organizations. AI registers usually include:

  • A non-technical overview of the AI application’s goals, use cases, and impacts.
  • The organizations responsible for the system.
  • Stage and date of system development.

Some registers also include information on

  • Data origins, management, processing, and quality issues.
  • Model architecture, key features, parameters, performance, and source code.
  • Bias, accessibility, and how those impacted were involved in system development.
  • Risk levels and mitigation, risk-benefit trade-offs, and impact assessments.
  • Human oversight in development, decision cycles, and monitoring.
  • How those impacted can seek an explanation for decisions.
  • Relevant privacy policies, information and system governance models, supplier contracts, and audit reports.

Most registers exclude AI that is embedded within commercial products, such as virtual assistants or spell checkers, but encourage organizations to default to reporting systems if unsure whether they qualify. They also exclude systems that fall under law or policy prohibiting public disclosure, which may be reported to oversight bodies instead.

From 2020 to 2024, under Executive Order 14110, the US government required all federal agencies to publish an annual inventory of their planned, new, and existing AI use cases, with exclusions only for very simple rule-based systems, robotic process automation, and defence systems. Other jurisdictions with AI registers include the Netherlands and Scotland, state governments of Texas, Vermont, Washington, and Catalonia, and municipalities of Amsterdam, Helsinki and San Jose.

Expectations for federal organizations

Approach

The AI Strategy lays out an approach for the Government of Canada to follow in advancing its AI adoption, but there is clearly much work still to be done in pursuing its implementation. During the months following publication, TBS will be engaging departments on the actions laid out in the AI Strategy to confirm action leads and develop a detailed implementation plan including resources, responsibilities, timelines, and milestones. It will also continue to engage all departments on action implementation to ensure horizontal alignment.

Expectations of all federal organizations

All federal organizations have a part to play in the implementation of the AI Strategy, regardless of whether they are leading actions within it. To prepare for this, all organizations should:

Relevant strategies and policy

The Strategy builds on existing commitments in other strategies to the responsible adoption of AI and its enablers such as infrastructure, data, cybersecurity, and talent.

Strategies

2023-2026 Data Strategy
Developing and implementing common data stewardship practices, using the Government’s data holdings to derive insights for decision making, and building both specialist capacity and data literacy within the public service through access to tools and training. Given the dependence of AI on quality data, the implementation of the Data Strategy will be a critical enabler for the success of the AI Strategy.

Digital Ambition
Foresees the use of AI as part of the goal of delivering modern services with a digital mindset. It identifies the need for responsible AI, fairness and transparency to allow Canada to benefit from efficiency gains while countering potential harms from ungoverned AI. It also identifies the importance of transparency and preserving privacy in the handling of personal data to maintain the trust of Canadians.

Application Hosting Strategy
Explains how the Government of Canada will optimize its use of cloud to maximize business value, reduce technical debt, and continue to evolve its service-focused culture.

Canadian Sovereign AI Compute Strategy
Invests in public and commercial computing infrastructure to support the Canadian AI ecosystem and safeguard Canadian data and intellectual property.

Enterprise Cyber Security Strategy
Sets out a risk-based, whole-of-government approach to ensure that the Government can quickly and effectively combat cyber threats and address vulnerabilities. It aims to help safeguard government systems, protect Canadians’ information and strengthen the resilience of digital government to ensure the continued delivery of secure and reliable digital services. foster the right skills, knowledge, and culture to support cyber security.

Policies

The AI Strategy should also be read in the context of relevant laws and policies:

Together, these policies create a framework for responsible, secure and successful AI adoption.

Engagement and consultation

Between May and October 2024, TBS engaged stakeholders, Indigenous partners, public servants, and the public on the development of the Strategy. TBS held roundtables to seek the input of academics, civil society, Indigenous organizations, industry, and labour, engaged provincial and territorial governments and other federal departments, and held a public consultation through Consulting with Canadians.

Key findings

The findings of these engagements can be found in the What We Heard report. Key themes heard from participants included:

Engagement and inclusive design

Participants highlighted the importance of engagement and partnerships with academia, civil society, Indigenous partners, industry, and other jurisdictions on AI adoption. They also suggested holding regular public consultations to gather feedback and ensure that AI initiatives are aligned with public expectations and collaborating with international and multilateral partners to align approaches. AI systems must be designed to meet the needs of all users, especially marginalized communities, requiring engagement with groups which have specific access or accessibility needs.

Ethical use

Respondents said comprehensive ethical guidelines for AI use in the federal public service were essential. These guidelines should cover fairness, transparency, accountability, and bias prevention. Respondents suggested regular ethical audits to ensure compliance with the guidelines and prevent harmful biases.

Preparing the workforce

Participants saw a need for comprehensive retraining programs to equip public servants with the skills to work with AI technologies, and to consult bargaining agents on retraining and impacts on public service workforce.

Infrastructure and data readiness

High-performance computing and cloud infrastructure should be available, secure and scalable to meet the demands of AI projects. The Government of Canada also needs continued investment in data governance frameworks to ensure that data is clean, accurate, and available for AI applications.

Environmental impact

The Government of Canada should minimize the environmental impact of its AI use by deploying AI appropriately and choosing solutions that demonstrate responsible environmental practices.

Transparency and accountability

Participants wanted clear communication about how and when AI is used, with labels for AI-generated content and published information about AI systems. They also wanted ways to seek explanations and recourse for system decisions.

Potential uses for AI

Participants identified many administrative uses for AI, such as drafting and translating text, managing documents and inboxes, and scheduling personnel processes. They saw potential to use AI to generate insights from large public health, environmental, and economic data sets, and to extract information from legal and policy documents and public consultations to inform decisions. They also proposed using AI to make service and legal case processing more efficient.

No-go areas

Areas cited by participants where AI should not be used included decisions on criminal justice cases, hiring, and social service eligibility, because of the risk of bias and the need for explainability and individual discretion. Participants also felt AI should not be used for mass data collection or surveillance, or to make policy decisions without human input.

© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, as represented by the President of the Treasury Board, 2025,
ISBN: 978-0-660-76811-3

Page details

2025-07-09