Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical Document – Lead
Table of Contents
- Identity, Use and Sources in the Environment
- Analytical Methods and Treatment Technology
- Health Effects
- Absorption and Distribution
- Acute and Chronic Exposure
- Neurological Effects in Infants and Children
- Neurological Effects in Animals
- Carcinogenicity, Genotoxicity and Reproductive Effects
- Classification and Assessment
The maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) for lead in drinking water is 0.010 mg/L (10 µg/L). It is recommended that faucets be flushed before water is taken for analysis or consumption.
Identity, Use and Sources in the Environment
Lead is the most common of the heavy elements. Several stable isotopes exist in nature, 208Pb being the most abundant. The average molecular weight is 207.2. Lead is a soft metal that resists corrosion and has a low melting point (327°C). It has therefore been used extensively since Roman times and, as a result, has become widely distributed throughout the environment.Footnote 1
In 1984, 264 300 tonnes of lead in all forms, including recycled lead, were produced in Canada, and 130 550 tonnes of refined lead were consumed.Footnote 2 In the same year, 67 000 tonnes were used in the production of lead acid storage batteries, and less than 50 000 tonnes (10 000 tonnes from each of the following categories) were used in the production of tetraethyl lead, pigments and chemicals, solder, other alloys and cables.Footnote 3 From a drinking water perspective, the almost universal use of lead compounds in plumbing fittings and as solder in water distribution systems is important. Distribution systems and plumbing installed before 1945 may be made from lead pipe.Footnote 4
Solid and liquid (sludge) wastes account for about 81% of the lead discharged into the Canadian environment, usually into landfills,Footnote 5 but lead has been dispersed more widely in the general environment through atmospheric emissions. In 1982, leaded gasoline additives accounted for 63% of all atmospheric emissions.Footnote 5 With the introduction of unleaded fuel, emissions from this source declined from a peak of 14 360 tonnes in 1973 to 6500 tonnes in 1983.Footnote 3 Emissions have declined to virtually nil in 1991Footnote 6 as a result of the phaseout of leaded gasoline in December 1990 under the Gasoline Regulations of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.Footnote 7
Lead is present in tap water as a result of dissolution from natural sources or from household plumbing systems containing lead in pipes, solder or service connections to homes. The amount of lead from the plumbing system that may be dissolved depends upon several factors, including the acidity (pH), water softness and standing time of the water, with soft, acidic water being most plumbosolvent.Footnote 8 Lead concentrations in untreated water were generally less than 1 µg/L in 71 Canadian municipalities in two national surveys conducted in 1976 and 1977.Footnote 9Footnote 10 Mean levels in tap water samples taken after three to five minutes of flushing (to remove any standing water) were below 1 µg/L (range ≤1 to 65 µg/L) in the two national surveys and 4 µg/L (range ≤1 to 48 µ/L) in 64 municipalities in surveys conducted in Ontario between 1981 and 1985.Footnote 11 The concentration of lead determined from integrated monitoring of all tap water used in the kitchens of 18 homes in Montreal ranged from 0.25 to 2.76 µg/L, with a median of 0.65 µg/L.Footnote 12 The median level of lead in drinking water samples collected in five Canadian cities during a duplicate diet study was 2.0 µg/L.Footnote 13 In a recent study in Ontario, the concentration of lead in water actually consumed was determined using a composite sampler in 40 homes at seven locations.Footnote 14 The average concentration of lead over a one-week sampling period ranged from 1.1 to 30.7 µg/L, with a median level of 4.8 µg/L. The results of this study are considered to be the most realistic estimate of the intake of lead from drinking water. Using the median concentration of 4.8 µg/L and daily drinking water consumption of 1.5 L for an adult and 0.6 L for a child, the average daily consumption of lead from drinking water is 7.2 µg for an adult and 2.9 µg for a child.
Food can be contaminated by naturally occurring lead in soil as well as by lead from sources such as atmospheric fallout, water used for cooking or the use of lead-soldered cans. The use of lead-soldered cans has been estimated to contribute 13 to 22% of the total dietary intake of lead.Footnote 15 Intake of lead from this source has declined markedly in Canada in recent years as the use of cans with lead solder has been phased down by the food processing industry. Based on recent analyses of lead in food in a national market basket study, the intakes of lead from food have been estimated to be 1.1 µg/kg bw per day for children aged one to four years and 0.75 µg/kg bw per day for adults.Footnote 16 This represents a drop of 56% between 1985 and 1989 for children.
Annual geometric mean concentrations measured at more than 100 National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) stations across Canada have declined steadily from 0.74 µg/m3 in 1973 to <0.1 µg/m3 (the detection limit) in 1991,Footnote 6Footnote 17 paralleling the decrease in the use of lead additives in gasoline to their phaseout in December 1990. Some sampling stations in a few Canadian cities still record measurable concentrations of lead in air (e.g., Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Toronto, Hamilton, Montreal), but average concentrations in these cities are not above 0.1 µg/m3. It is difficult to estimate the current average intake of lead from air, as geometric mean concentrations, although well below the detection limit, are not measurable. Intakes for a two-year-old child and an adult have been estimated to be 0.36 and 1.2 µg/d, respectively, based on NAPS data using one-third the detection limit with a sampling height correction factor of 2.Footnote * Soils and household dust are significant sources of lead exposure for small children.Footnote 20Footnote 21 In 1973, in Toronto homes not near point sources, average lead concentrations were 110 µg/g in garden soil and 845 µg/g in household dust.Footnote 22 There are no recent data for lead concentrations in household dust in urban Canadian homes. Lead in soil and lead in outdoor air are the main contributors to lead in household dust in Canada. Based on Toronto data, average concentrations of lead in soil and air have declined by 43% and 76%, respectively, between 1973 and 1984, or 3.9% and 6.9% per year, respectively.Footnote 17Footnote 23Footnote 24 Using these data,Footnote * the concentration of lead in household dust in urban communities can be estimated to be 350 µg/g in 1984 and 140 µg/g in 1990, assuming no airborne lead and a further reduction of 24% for lead in soil between 1984 and 1990.
Other sources of lead intake include ceramic ware, activities involving arts and crafts, peeling paint and renovations resulting in dust or fumes from paint.Footnote 25 No allowance has been made for the contribution of lead from these sources, because they occur on a highly sporadic basis and because no quantitative data are available. It has been pointed outFootnote 25 that old paint has been an important source of excess lead intake for inner-city children living in older housing stock in the United States. This may not be as important in Canada as in the United States, because Canada's stock of older housing is smaller relative to the total stock available. However, these sources, as well as occurrences of high lead concentrations in drinking water in some older houses, can be extremely important for a small number of children.
Total intakes and uptakes of lead from all sources are shown in Table 1 for children and adults in urban areas. The relative contribution of water to average intake is estimated to be 9.8% and 11.3% for children and adults, respectively. Total intake of lead from three of the four major sources--air, food and dust--appears to have dropped significantly since the mid-1980s as a result of regulatory and voluntary actions to control lead from air (via gasoline) and food (via cans). For young children, average daily intake is calculated to be about 29 µg/d, down from 70 µg/d calculated on the basis of 1984 to 1986 data, and is now below the intake of 48 µg/d for a two-year-old based on the World Health Organization's (WHO) provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of 25 µg/kg bw, equivalent to approximately 3.5 µg/kg bw per day.Footnote 26
|Child (two years
old, 13.6 kg)
|Adult (70 kg)|
|Dust, dirt||140 µg/g||11.2
Analytical Methods and Treatment Technology
Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) may be used to determine concentrations of lead and other metals in water. Detection limits of less than 1 µg/L can be achieved;Footnote 12 however, practical quantitation limits (PQLs) are usually 1 to 3 µg/L during routine monitoring studies.Footnote 11 Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) is frequently used in routine monitoring analyses, because of speed, relative freedom from interference by other components in the sample and lower cost per analysis. This technique is preferable to AAS when multi-element analysis is required. The detection limit is 1 to 2 µg/L and the PQL is about 7 to 10 µg/L.Footnote 29 Because the maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) for lead in drinking water is intended to apply to average concentrations in distributed water, sampling should be carried out on flushed samples at the point of consumption.
Conventional water treatments, including settling, aluminum sulphate (alum) or ferric sulphate coagulation and filtration are reasonably effective in removing lead from treated drinking water. Lime softening at elevated pH is also effective in removal of lead. However, because the majority of lead in drinking water is introduced after leaving the treatment plant as a result of leaching from materials in the distribution system or household plumbing, corrosion control is a more effective method of preventing high concentrations of lead at the point of consumption. Adjustment of the pH from less than 7 to 8 or 9 and moderate increases in alkalinity, measured as carbonate, to more than 30 mg/L reduce the plumbosolvency of acidic waters and minimize leaching.Footnote 30Footnote 31 Corrosion inhibitors such as zinc orthophosphate or silicate-based inhibitors may also be added. Although water treatment can reduce tap water lead concentrations substantially, water treatment alone may be inadequate to reduce lead to concentrations below 10 µg/L when water is supplied through leaded distribution systems and lead concentrations are high.Footnote 32 Other effective methods of treatment, which are also suitable for home use, include reverse osmosis and ion exchange using a strong acid cation resin; activated adsorption has also been reported to be effective in some cases.
Absorption and Distribution
Lead can be absorbed by the body through inhalation, ingestion, dermal contact (mainly as a result of occupational exposure)Footnote 33 or transfer via the placenta.Footnote 34 In adults, approximately 10% of ingested lead is absorbed into the body.Footnote 20 Young children absorb from 40% to 53% of lead ingested from food.Footnote 35Footnote 36 For lead in soil and dust, the gastrointestinal absorption rate in children has been estimated as 30%.Footnote 21 Absorption of lead is greatly increased after fasting and when the intakes of dietary calcium and phosphorus are low.Footnote 37Footnote 38The relationship between blood lead levels of children and adults and the concentration of lead in water and in food appears to be curvilinear overall, with the curve at low doses near-linear.Footnote 39Footnote 40Footnote 41Footnote 42 The amount of airborne lead deposited and absorbed in the lungs of adults ranges from 30% to 50%.Footnote 20 No data on absorption following inhalation in children are available; however, their respiratory uptake of lead is likely to be comparatively greater than that of adults on a body weight basis.Footnote 20 Placental transfer of lead occurs in humans as early as the twelfth week of gestation, and uptake of lead by the foetus continues throughout development.Footnote 43 The concentration of lead in umbilical cord blood is correlated with maternal blood lead levels in ratios that range from 0.8 to 1.0.Footnote 34Footnote 39Footnote 44Footnote 45 The ratio of foetal blood lead level to maternal blood lead level is also about 0.8 to 1.0.Footnote 34Footnote 44Once lead is absorbed, it enters either a "rapid turnover" biological pool with distribution to the soft tissues (blood, liver, lung, spleen, kidney and bone marrow) or a "slow turnover" pool with distribution mainly to the skeleton.Footnote 46 Of total body lead, approximately 80 to 95% in adults and about 73% in children accumulate in the skeleton.Footnote 47Footnote 48 The biological half-life of lead is approximately 16 to 40 days in bloodFootnote 46Footnote 49 and about 17 to 27 years in bones.Footnote 46Footnote 50Metabolic balance studies in infants and young children indicated that net retention of lead averaged 32% of intake above intakes of 5 µg/kg bw per day, whereas retention was negative (i.e., excretion exceeded intake) below 5 µg/kg bw per day. Regression analysis indicated a balance point of 4.1 µg/kg bw per day.Footnote 36 No increases in blood lead were observed in infants with low exposure to other sources of lead and mean dietary intakes of 3 to 4 µg/kg bw per day,Footnote 51 thus confirming the metabolic data.
Although blood lead concentrations reflect only recent intake (about 40 days), there is a steady state distribution of lead between various organs and systems under conditions of chronic exposure.Footnote 20 The blood lead concentration is, therefore, a reasonably good indicator of exposure from all sourcesFootnote 25 and is commonly used for this purpose.
Acute and Chronic Exposure
Lead is a cumulative general poison, with foetuses, infants, children up to six years of age and pregnant women (because of their foetuses) being most susceptible to adverse health effects. Lead can severely affect the central nervous system. Overt signs of acute intoxication include dullness, restlessness, irritability, poor attention span, headaches, muscle tremor, hallucinations and loss of memory,Footnote 52 with encephalopathy occurring at blood lead levels of 100 to 120 µg/dL in adults and 80 to 100 µg/dL in children.Footnote 20 Signs of chronic lead toxicity, including tiredness, sleeplessness, irritability, headaches, joint pain and gastrointestinal symptoms, may appear in adults with blood lead levels of 50 to 80 µg/dL.Footnote 53 After one or two years of exposure, muscle weakness, gastrointestinal symptoms, lower scores on psychometric tests, disturbances in mood and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy were observed in occupationally exposed populations at blood lead levels of 40 to 60 µg/dL.Footnote 54Footnote 55At levels of 30 to 50 µg/dL, there were significant reductions in nerve conduction velocity.Footnote 56 Renal disease has long been associated with lead poisoning; however, chronic nephropathy in adults and children has not been detected below blood lead levels of 40 µg/dL.Footnote 57Footnote 58 In a recent epidemiological study, there was no evidence of an association between hypertension and lead-induced renal effects in men with blood lead concentrations below 35 µg/dL, but there was some suggestion (not statistically significant) of increased hypertension at blood lead concentrations above 37 µg/dL.Footnote 59 A significant (p ≤ 0.01) association has been established, without evidence of a threshold, between blood lead levels in the range 7 to 34 µg/dL and high diastolic blood pressure in people aged 21 to 55, and particularly for white men aged 40 to 49 years, using data from the second U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II).Footnote 60Footnote 61 The significance of these results has since been questioned, following further analysis of the same data using a different statistical method.Footnote 62 Lead interferes with the activity of several of the major enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of haem.Footnote 20 As haem is a constituent of several haemoproteins, interference with its biosynthesis would be expected to result in multi-organ toxicity; however, the only clinically well'defined symptom is anaemia,Footnote 63 which occurs only at blood lead levels in excess of 40 µg/dL in children.Footnote 64 In children, inhibition of the activity of d-aminolevulinic acid dehydrase has been noted at blood lead concentrations as low as 5 µg/dL.Footnote 20Footnote 65 However, no adverse health consequences are associated with inhibition at this level.
Impairment of the insertion of iron(II) into the porphyrin ring to form haem results in an accumulation of erythrocyte protoporphyrin (EP). No-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) for increases in EP levels occurred in infants and children at about 15 to 17 µg/dL,Footnote 66-69 whereas elevated EP levels were significantly (p ≤ 0.02) correlated with blood lead levels above 15 and 20 µg/dL, with 50% of children showing elevations of two standard deviations above "normal" values at blood lead concentrations of 25 and 35 µg/dL.Footnote 66Footnote 68 In adults, the NOAEL for increases in EP levels ranged from 25 to 30 µg/dL;Footnote 70 for females alone, the NOAEL ranged from 20 to 25 µg/dL, which is closer to that observed for children.Footnote 68Footnote 71 Anaemia results from both lead-induced inhibition of haem synthesis and shortening of erythrocyte survival.Footnote 72 The NOAEL for changes in haemoglobin concentration in blood has been suggested to be 50 µg/dL in adults and 40 µg/dL in children.Footnote 64Footnote 73 Changes in growth patterns in infants less than 42 months old have been associated with increased levels of EP, with persistent increases in high blood EP levels leading initially to a rapid gain in weight but subsequently to a retardation of growth.Footnote 74 An analysis of the NHANES II data showed a highly significant negative correlation between the stature of children aged seven years and younger and blood lead levels in the range 5 to 35 µg/dL.Footnote 75 Lead has also been shown to interfere with calcium metabolism, both directly and by perturbation of the haem-mediated generation of the vitamin D precursor 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. The vitamin D-endocrine system plays a major role in the maintenance of extra- and intracellular calcium homeostasis,Footnote 76Footnote 77 bone remodelling, intestinal absorption of minerals, cell differentiation and immunoregulatory capacity.Footnote 20 Dose-related significant decreases (p ≤ 0.001) in circulating 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels were observed in children with blood lead concentrations ranging from 33 to 55 µg/dL compared with children with blood lead levels ranging from 10 to 26 µg/dL.Footnote 78 A regression analysis indicated that significant decreases were associated (r = -0.88) over the entire range of blood lead concentrations from 12 to 120 µg/dL, with no evidence of a threshold.Footnote 79 Tissue lead content is increased in calcium-deficient persons, a fact that assumes great importance when considering the increased propensity to lead exposure that could result from the calcium-deficient status of the pregnant woman. Finally, it has been demonstrated that interactions between calcium and lead were responsible for a significant portion of the variance in the scores on general intelligence ratings, and that calcium had a significant effect on the deleterious effect of lead.Footnote 80 Several lines of evidence demonstrate that both the central and peripheral nervous systems are principal targets for lead toxicity. These include subencephalopathic neurological and behavioural effects in adults and electrophysiological evidence of both central and peripheral effects on the nervous system in children with blood lead levels well below 30 µg/dL. Aberrant electroencephalograph readings were significantly correlated (p <0.05) with blood lead levels down to 15 µg/dL, with effects at non-significant levels noted down to 6 µ/dL.Footnote 81Footnote 82 Significant reductions in maximal motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) have been observed in five- to nine-year-old children living near a smelter, with a threshold occurring at a blood lead level around 20 µg/dL. A 2% decrease in the MNCV was seen for every 10 µg/dL increase in the blood lead level.Footnote 83 The auditory nerve may be a target for lead toxicity, based on reports of reduced hearing acuity in children.Footnote 84 In the NHANES II survey in the United States, the association with blood lead was highly significant at all blood lead levels from 5 to 45 µg/dL (p <0.0001) for children four to 19 years old, with a 10 to 20% increased likelihood of an elevated hearing threshold for persons with a blood lead level of 20 µg/dL compared with 4 µ/dL.Footnote 85 The NHANES II data also revealed that blood lead levels were significantly associated with the age at which infants first sat up, first walked and first started to speak. Although no threshold existed for the age at which the children first walked, thresholds existed at the 29th and 28th percentile of lead rank for the age at which the children sat up and spoke, respectively.Footnote 85
Neurological Effects in Infants and Children
A number of cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiological studies have been published that have considered the possible detrimental effects that exposure of young children to lead might have on their intellectual abilities and behaviour. These studies have been concerned with documenting effects arising from exposure to "low" levels of lead (i.e., <40 µg/dL), at which overt clinical symptoms are absent. Interpretation of these epidemiological data has often been contentious for a number of reasons, many of which have been discussed in the literature.Footnote 86Footnote 87 The validity of the conclusions made by the authors of these epidemio-logical studies has been shown to depend upon a number of factors,Footnote 87 including: 1) the statistical power of the study, 2) the effect of bias in the selection of the study and control populations, 3) the choice of the parameter used to evaluate the exposure to lead, 4) the temporal relation between exposure measurement and psychological evaluations, 5) the extent to which the tests utilized for evaluating neurological and behavioural parameters can be quantified accurately and reproducibly, and the extent to which the test results are strictly comparable with those from other studies, 6) which confounding covariates have been included or excluded in any multiple regression analysis, and whether it has been considered that some of these covariates may be interlinked, and 7) the effect of various nutritional and dietary factors such as iron and calcium intake.Footnote 88 A number of cross-sectional studies exist in which due account has been taken of many of the above factors. In one of the earliest studies, by Needleman and colleagues, a group of 58 six- and seven-year-old children with "high" dentine lead levels (i.e., above 24 µg/g dentine; blood lead level 30 to 50 µg/dL) taken from a cohort of about 2100 American children performed significantly less well than 100 children from a "low" dentine lead group (i.e., below 6 µg/g dentine; mean blood lead level 24 µg/dL). The children's performance was measured using the Wechsler Intelligence Test in addition to other visual and auditory tests and teachers' behavioural ratings.Footnote 89 There was a significant difference (p <0.03) of four points and a uniform downward shift in IQ scores between the "low" and "high" dentine lead groups. A child in the group with "high" dentine lead was three times more likely to have an IQ of 80 or lower than a child in the "low" dentine lead group. The results on IQ remained almost unchanged after further reanalysis using multiple regression rather than analysis of covariance and using the father's education instead of his socioeconomic status;Footnote 90 however, in a more recent review, the effect was claimed to be statistically significant only for children with the highest lead levels in dentine (blood lead level above 40 µg/dL).Footnote 20 In a follow-up study of these children 11 years later, children in the original "high" dentine lead group were significantly more likely than those in the "low" dentine lead group to have been involved in juvenile delinquency, to have quit school early and to have had other behavioural problems.Footnote 91 The Needleman study served as a stimulus for a number of cross-sectional studies on lead and neuro-behavioural effects in children. A similar study in which dentine was also used as the indicator of exposure was carried out using a cohort of 400 British children.Footnote 92 There were several consistent but non-significant differences between the high and low dentine lead groups similar to those observed in the American study, with IQ decrements of about two points and poorer scores in behaviour indices. In the British study, mean blood lead levels in the "high" exposure group (15.1 µg/dL) were lower than the mean of the "low" group (24 µg/dL) in the American study, a possible explanation for the lack of statistical significance of the results. Results from studies on German childrenFootnote 93-95were similar to those of the British study, in that the effect of lead on behaviour had only borderline significance (p <0.10).
Another studyFootnote 96 involving 500 Edinburgh school children aged six to nine years demonstrated a small (up to five points in the British Ability Scales) but significant (p <0.003) negative relationship between blood lead levels and intelligence scores, reading skills and number skills. There was a dose-response relationship in the range 5.6 to 22.1 µg/dL. The effect of lead was small (less than 1% of variance was due to lead) compared with several other of the 33 variables considered (including birth history and the mother's and father's socioeconomic status and general intelligence). Blood lead levels averaged 11.5 µg/dL (range 3.3 to 34.0 µg/dL). In contrast, a series of studies97-99 on a total of about 800 British children with blood lead levels between 4 and 32 µg/dL showed no significant associations between blood lead levels and indices of intelligence and behaviour after socioeconomic and family characteristics had been taken into account. In accounting for their negative resultsFootnote 98 compared with results from an earlier study,Footnote 100 the authors pointed out that lead might have a noticeable effect only when other factors (particularly socioeconomic or home environment) leading to disadvantage are present.Footnote 98Footnote 101 In a cross-sectional study in Lavrion, Greece, involving 509 primary school children living near a lead smelter, blood lead levels of between 7.4 and 63.9 µg/dL (mean level 23.7 µg/dL) were recorded.Footnote 102 When the IQ was measured using the revised Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children and due account taken of 17 potential confounders, it was found that there was a significant association between blood lead levels and IQ, with a threshold at about 25 µg/dL. Attentional performance was also associated with blood lead levels using two different tests; in this case, however, no threshold level was found.
This study was part of a multi-centre collaborative international study with school'aged children sponsored by the WHO and the Commission of European Communities.Footnote 103 A more or less common protocol was adopted, and quality assurance procedures were followed for the exposure analyses. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children for verbal and performance testing, the "trail'making test" and the German form of the Bender Gestalt test for visual-motor integration, the Vienna Reaction Device for delayed reaction time and general behaviour ratings were employed by some or all of the eight centres. Psychometric intelligence was negatively affected in five of the eight studies. The association with blood lead level was marginal, except in the Greek study (above) in which blood lead concentrations were high and a Danish study in which they were quite low. The most consistent associations were for visual-motor integration as measured by the Bender Gestalt test and for reaction performance as measured by the Vienna Reaction Device. Six of seven centres reported increased error scores on the Bender Gestalt test in association with increased lead burden (but statistically significant in only one case). Three of four centres reported disruption of serial choice reaction performance in the Vienna reaction test. The results of the remaining tests were inconsistent. The degree of association between lead exposure and outcome was very weak even in the statistically significant cases. (The complete report of this study was not available at the time of this analysis.) The cross-sectional studies are on balance consistent in demonstrating statistically significant associations between blood lead levels of 30 µg/dL or more and IQ deficits of about four points. Although there were associations between lower blood lead levels and IQ deficits of about two points, these relationships were marginally statistically significant, except for the Edinburgh study, in which they were significant. It is particularly difficult to determine minimum levels (as measured in blood) above which significant effects occur.
An equal number of prospective studies have shown no consistent association between mental development and blood lead levels, either in the perinatal period or in early childhood. A study carried out with extremely socially disadvantaged mothers and infants in Cleveland did not show any relationship between blood lead levels at any time and language development, the Bailey MDI or the Stanford-Binet IQ test at age three years after confounding factors were considered, the most important of which was the care-giving environment. In this cohort, half the mothers had alcohol'related problems, and the average maternal IQ was 79.Footnote 109 A second Australian study has been carried out in Sydney on a relatively advantaged population of 318 mothers and children. No association was found between blood lead levels in the mother or the child at any age with mental or motor deficits at age four years after six covariates, including the HOME score (a measure of the care-giving environment), were considered. Moreover, there was no consistency with regard to the direction of the coefficients.Footnote 110 The third negative study was carried out in Glasgow, where the primary exposure was to high water lead, which was reduced dramatically by corrosion control measures shortly after the children were born. The cohort was divided into high, medium and low groups on the basis of maternal blood lead levels, with means of 33.1, 17.7 and 7.0 µg/dL, respectively. Although the expected decrements in scores in the Bailey MDI and PDI were observed at ages one and two years as lead exposure increased, they could be better explained by birth weight, home environment and socioeconomic status, as analysed by stepwise multiple regression analysis. This was true even when birth weight was removed from the analysis (it was lower in the high lead group).Footnote 111 Results from the prospective studies have been somewhat inconsistent after the initial Boston study. It appears that prenatal exposure may have early effects on mental development, but that these effects do not persist to age four, at least not using the tests so far employed. There are indications that these early effects may be mediated through birth weight or other factors. Several studies indicated that the generally higher exposures of children in the 18- to 36-month age range may be negatively associated with mental development, but this, too, has not been confirmed in other studies.
Neurological Effects in Animals
Research on young primates also supports the view that significant (p ≤ 0.05) behavioural impairment of the same type as that observed in children (measures of activity, attention, memory, distractibility, adaptability and learning ability) occurs at doses of lead given postnatally (for 29 weeks) that resulted in blood lead concentrations from 10.9 to 33 µg/dL.Footnote 112 These effects persisted into young adulthood after concentrations in the blood returned to 11 to 13 µg/dL and were maintained for the next eight to nine years.Footnote 113
Carcinogenicity, Genotoxicity and Reproductive Effects
The carcinogenicity of lead in humans has been investigated in several epidemiological studies of occupationally exposed workers.Footnote 114Footnote 115Footnote 116Footnote 117 There was no excess of overall cancer deaths in two small studies, one with an observed:expected ratio of 0.87 on a total of 337 deaths from all causesFootnote 115 and the other with an observed:expected ratio of 0.59 on a total of 140 deaths from 1930 to 1977.Footnote 116 In the latter, however, there was a substantial excess of deaths from chronic renal disease (standardized proportional mortality ratio was 3.06 for 1930 to 1977, p ≤ 0.05). A study on 7000 smelter and battery factory workers employed between 1946 and 1970 for one or more years indicated a slight but not statistically significant excess of deaths from cancer of the digestive and respiratory systems. Mean blood lead levels were 79.7 µg/dL for smelter workers and 62.7 µg/dL for battery workers.Footnote 118 A follow-up studyFootnote 117 reported an excess of respiratory cancer deaths (observed:expected ratio of 1.14) in battery plant workers, but the potential confounding effect of smoking was not considered. The International Agency for Research on Cancer considered the overall evidence for the carcinogenicity of lead to humans to be inadequate.Footnote 114 Renal tumours have been induced in rats exposed orally to high levels, 1000 ppm or more in the diet (approximately 50 mg/kg bw per day), of certain lead salts (lead acetate, subacetate and phosphate); tests on other salts were inadequate. Lead acetate also caused renal tumours in mice at 1000 ppm in the diet.Footnote 114Footnote 115Footnote 119In one study, lead concentrations of 5, 8, 62, 141, 500, 1000 or 2000 ppm in the diet (approximately 0.3, 0.9, 3, 7, 27, 56 and 105 mg/kg bw per day) were fed to rats for two years. Renal tumours developed in male rats at 500 ppm (approximately 27 mg/kg bw per day) and above but only at 2000 ppm (105 mg/kg bw per day) in female rats.Footnote 120 As a detailed description of this experiment, including histopathology and systemic toxicity, has never been published, no further evaluation of it is possible; the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyFootnote 32 did not find this study adequate for developing a quantitative risk assessment for carcinogenicity.
The evidence for an effect of lead on genetic material is conflicting, but the weight of evidence suggests that some salts of lead are genotoxic. Lead chloride, lead acetate, lead oxide and lead tetroxide were inactive in mutation tests on a number of procaryotes and fungi, including Salmonella typhimurium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In vitro tests on human cells were positive for chromosomal damage in one case and negative in two others. In vivo short-term tests on mice, rats, cattle and monkeys were positive in three cases (dominant lethal test and chromosomal damage to bone marrow cells) but negative in five others. Cytogenetic studies in humans exposed to lead, usually with blood lead levels above 40 µg/dL, are also conflicting, with seven negative reports and nine positive reports of chromatid and chromosomal aberrations, breaks and gaps.Footnote 114Footnote 115 Gonadal dysfunction in men has been associated with blood lead levels of 40 to 50 µg/dL,Footnote 121Footnote 122 and there may also be reproductive dysfunction in females occupationally exposed to lead.Footnote 20Footnote 115 Increased spontaneous abortion and rates of stillbirths have been associated with lead intoxication of workers in the lead industry.Footnote 115 A link has also been suggested for lower, environmentally encountered levels. Miscarriage and stillbirth rates were elevated in the Australian lead smelter town of Port Pirie in comparison with a rural area matched for other variables. Blood lead levels averaged 10.6 µg/dL for Port Pirie women and 7.6 µg/dL for the controls.Footnote 123 Exposure of pregnant women to lead also increases the risk of pre-term delivery. In the study of 774 pregnant women in Port Pirie who were followed to the completion of their pregnancy, multivariate analysis revealed that the relative risk of pre-term delivery rose more than fourfold when blood lead levels rose from 8 to >14 µg/dL. If cases of late foetal death were excluded from the analysis, the association became even stronger, with the relative risk due to lead exposure increasing to 8.9 when blood lead levels exceeded 14 µg/dL.Footnote 123 Animal studies in rats lend support to the findings in humans, with effects at blood lead levels above 30 µg/dL on sperm counts and testicular atrophy in males and on oestrous cycles in females.Footnote 124Footnote 125 In a survey of more than 4000 consecutive births, elevated cord blood lead levels were associated with minor malformations, such as angiomas, syndactylism and hydrocele in about 10% of all babies. The covariate-adjusted relative risk of malformation doubled at blood lead levels of about 7 to 10 µg/dL, and the incidence of any defect increased with increasing cord lead levels across the range in the population, from 0.7 to 35.1 µg/dL.Footnote 126
Classification and Assessment
The evidence for the carcinogenicity of lead in humans is inconclusive, because of the limited number of studies, the use of small cohorts leading to lack of statistical power and a lack of consideration of confounding variables. An association has been shown in animals between the ingestion of lead salts at high doses and renal tumours. Lead has been classified in Group IIIB--possibly carcinogenic to humans (inadequate data in humans, limited evidence in animals), according to the classification scheme of the Environmental Health Directorate of the Department of National Health and Welfare.
For compounds classified in Group IIIB, the acceptable daily intake (ADI) is derived on the basis of division of the NOAEL or LOAEL in humans or in animals by appropriate uncertainty factors, taking into account the equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity. For lead, there is also evidence from human studies that adverse effects other than cancer may occur at very low levels, and that a guideline derived for these effects would also be protective for the risk of carcinogenic effects.
The WHOFootnote 26 established a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) for lead for children of 25 µg/kg bw, equivalent to an ADI of approximately 3.5 µg/kg bw per day. This PTWI was established on the premise that lead is a cumulative poison and that there should be no increase in the body burden of lead from any source, thus avoiding the possibility of adverse biochemical and neurobehavioural effects in infants and young children. It was based on metabolic studies in infantsFootnote 36Footnote 51 showing that a mean daily lead intake of 3 to 4 µg/kg bw was a NOAEL and was not associated with an increase in blood lead levels or in the body burden of lead, whereas a daily intake of 5 µg/kg bw or more resulted in lead retention. An unusually small uncertainty factor (less than 2) reflected the conservatism of the end point, the quality of the metabolic data and use of one of the most susceptible groups in the population.
Because lead is classified in Group IIIB, the MAC for lead in drinking water is derived from the ADI as follows:
- 0.0035 mg/kg bw per day is the ADI, as derived above
- 13.6 kg bw is the average body weight of a two-year-old child
- 0.098 is the proportion of total daily intake allocated to drinking water, taken from Table 1, showing recent average intake data.Footnote 14 Intake of lead from sources other than water has decreased substantially over the last few years because of the phasedown of the use of lead-soldered cans in the food industry and the phaseout of lead additives in gasoline, processes that are now almost complete
- 0.6 L/d is the average daily water consumption for a two-year-old child.Footnote 127
The PQL for routine analysis of lead in drinking water is 1 to 10 µg/L, depending on other compounds that may also be present in some water supplies. Because the MAC should be measurable and achievable at reasonable cost, the MAC selected is 10 µg/L, or 0.010 mg/L, based on this PQL.
Because the MAC for lead is based on chronic effects, it is intended to apply to average concentrations in water consumed for extended periods; short-term consumption of water containing lead at concentrations above the MAC does not necessarily pose undue risk to health.
In order to minimize exposure to lead introduced into drinking water from plumbing systems, it is also recommended that only the cold water supply be used, after an appropriate period of flushing to rid the system of standing water, for analytical sampling, drinking, beverage preparation and cooking.
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: