Interim Policy bulletin 698

Policy numbers and titles:

Commissioner’s Directive (CD) 711: Structured Intervention Units

Guidelines (GL) 711-1: Structured Intervention Unit (SIU) Transfer Procedures: SIU Sites

Interim Policy Bulletin (IPB) 679

Why were these policies changed?

Amendments to the SIU policy suite have been made to strengthen and clarify accountabilities, ensure operational procedures are aligned with the revised legislative requirements that resulted from the passing of Bill C-83, and respond to internal compliance audits and reviews of SIUs by external stakeholders. These changes will strengthen SIU review procedures, documentation requirements, and data collection procedures.

What has changed?

Changes to CD 711, GL 711-1 and IPB 679
Amendments have been made to the following sections of CD 711:

The following sections have been added to GL 711-1:

Modifications have been made to the direction in IPB 679 which impact the following sections of CD 711:

For the full list of changes, please consult Annex A - English Changes and Annex B - SIU Case Conference (SIUCC) Correctional Plan Update (CPU) Content Guidelines.

How were they developed?

Amendments to CD 711, GL 711-1 and IPB 679 were developed by the SIU Operations Team in consultation with the SIU Corporate Team, Health Services, the Reintegration Operations Division and the Strategic Policy Division.

Accountabilities?

N/A

Who will be affected by the policies?

All Institutional Heads, supervisors and staff working in an SIU, or at a non-SIU site when inmates are subject to restricted movement, are affected by these changes.

Other impacts?

N/A

Annex A - English changes

Changes to CD 711 - Structured Intervention Units

Considerations in Decisions

Paragraph 65 has been amended to clarify that all CSC decisions related to the authorization and transfer of an inmate to an SIU, including a decision by an Assistant Warden, Interventions (AWI), or Assistant Warden, Operations (AWO), to confirm or cancel an SIU transfer authorization, must consider, as applicable, factors pursuant to section 28 and subsection 37.41(2) of the CCRA, as well as other relevant considerations. In addition, the inmate’s agreement with the plan to transfer out of the SIU has been added to “other” considerations.

Previous Direction Current Direction
  1. Decisions by the designated decision maker must include consideration of:
    1. the inmate’s Correctional Plan
    2. the appropriateness of the inmate’s confinement in the penitentiary
    3. the appropriateness of the inmate’s security classification
    4. other relevant considerations, such as:
      1. for Indigenous inmates, how their Indigenous social history was considered in support of alternatives to remaining in an SIU, pursuant to section 79.1 of the CCRA
      2. the inmate’s state of health and/or health care needs, as identified by a registered health care professional, and documented pursuant to section 87 of the CCRA
      3. the inmate’s engagement in opportunities for interactions with others
      4. the inmate’s representations, including the representations from the inmate’s legal counsel and/or assistant
      5. for women offenders, any special needs that support alternatives to remaining in an SIU
      6. information from the Victim Services Unit when the inmate has a Victim Notification flag in OMS
      7. gender identity or expression factors that were considered in support of alternatives to remaining in an SIU.
  1. A designated CSC decision maker must ensure their written decision is justified, provides a clear and detailed rationale and includes thoroughly documented considerations of:
    1. the factors identified in section 28 of the CCRA
    2. the inmate’s Correctional Plan
    3. the appropriateness of the inmate’s confinement in the penitentiary
    4. the appropriateness of the inmate’s security classification
    5. other relevant considerations, as applicable:
      1. for Indigenous inmates, how their Indigenous social history was considered in support of alternatives to remaining in an SIU, in accordance with section 79.1 of the CCRA
      2. the inmate’s state of health and/or health care needs, in accordance with section 87 of the CCRA, and whether any health care needs preclude remaining in an SIU as identified by a registered health care professional
      3. the inmate’s engagement in opportunities to spend time out of their cell and interact with others
      4. the inmate’s representations, including representations provided by the inmate’s legal counsel and/or assistant
      5. strategies to implement a decision to transfer an inmate out of an SIU in cases where the inmate is not in agreement with the plan
      6. available alternatives specific to the needs of women offenders
      7. information from the Victim Services Unit when the inmate has a Victim Notification flag in OMS, and
      8. gender identity or expression factors that were considered in support of alternatives to remaining in an SIU and, where none are identified, the reasons why.

Responsibilities - National Headquarters

Paragraph 69 has been amended to add an accountability for the Assistant Commissioner, Health Services (ACHS), to ensure that a quality assurance program is implemented.

Previous Direction Current Direction
  1. The Assistant Commissioner, Health Services, will chair the Health Committee.
  1. The Assistant Commissioner, Health Services, will:
    1. chair the Health Committee established by the Commissioner to review cases referred to the Committee in accordance with subsection 37.32(1) of the CCRA, and
    2. develop and implement a quality assurance program to ensure the delivery of safe, quality health care in SIUs and conduct annual reviews of the program.

Annex A - Definitions

The following definitions have been added to the policy to define and clarify terms in the new and existing policy direction.

Definitions

As soon as possible: at the earliest possible time or opportunity without compromising the safety of staff, inmates or the public and the security of the institution.

As soon as practicable: as soon as both possible and practical under all the facts and circumstances of the individual case and without compromising the safety of staff, inmates or the institution.

SIU compliance reports: reports measuring compliance with the responsibilities, procedures and timeframes outlined in the SIU policy suite, excluding those linked to the provision of health services in SIUs.

Changes to GL 711-1 - Structured Intervention Unit (SIU) Transfer Procedures - SIU Sites

Case Review Following Decision that an Inmate should not remain in SIU

The following has been added to provide direction in circumstances where an inmate refuses to transfer out of an SIU or where there is a delay in transferring an inmate out of an SIU following a decision by a designated CSC decision maker or an Independent External Decision Maker (IEDM), that an inmate should not remain in an SIU. In these cases, the Structured Intervention Unit Review Committee (SIURC) and further duration decisions are no longer required as it has already been determined that the inmate should not remain in the SIU. Instead, the new SIU case conference (SIUCC) process outlined below will ensure cases continue to be reviewed within similar timeframes as an SIURC and inmates are transferred out of an SIU as soon as possible.

Previous Direction Current Direction
The referenced paragraph was not previously in the policy direction.

Inmate Transfer Out of an SIU

The Institutional Head will ensure that an inmate is transferred out of the SIU as soon as practicable following:

  1. a decision by a designated CSC decision maker:
    1. to cancel an inmate’s SIU transfer authorization
    2. not to approve an inmate’s transfer to an SIU
    3. that an inmate should not remain in an SIU
  2. an IEDM’s determination that an inmate should not remain in an SIU.

When an inmate refuses to transfer out of the SIU or there is a delay in implementing a decision by a designated CSC decision maker or an IEDM that an inmate should not remain in an SIU, the SIU Parole Officer will:

  1. meet with the inmate within two working days of the decision and discuss the inmate’s refusal or delay in implementing the decision
  2. advise the SIU Manager of the outcome of the meeting with the inmate
  3. complete an SIU-CPU pursuant to GL 711‑1 - Structured Intervention Unit (SIU) Transfer Procedures- SIU Sites within five working days after the decision date and within every 30 calendar days thereafter until the inmate is physically transferred out of the SIU.

The SIU Manager will inform the Deputy Warden no later than one working day after the SIU Parole Officer has met with the inmate.

SIU Case Conference (SIUCC)

Following notification that an inmate is refusing to transfer out of the SIU or when there is a delay in implementing the decision, the Deputy Warden will:

  1. facilitate an SIUCC with the inmate’s Case Management Team, the inmate, and, as applicable, Health Services staff and other staff and contractors within:
    1. 20 calendar days after the decision date
    2. 30 calendar days thereafter until the inmate is transferred out of the SIU
  2. ensure the SIUCC, as applicable:
    1. confirms the plan to transfer the inmate out of the SIU as soon as practicable and documents what interventions/strategies have been attempted to implement the decision
    2. identifies strategies to motivate the inmate to transfer out of the SIU
    3. identifies actions and plans necessary to implement the decision if the original plan cannot be implemented.

SIUCC Documentation

Following each SIUCC, the Deputy Warden will ensure:

  1. the SIUCC is documented in the SIU application pursuant to the SIUCC content guidelines in Annex B of this IPB within five calendar days of the SIUCC
  2. the Institutional Head is provided with the SIUCC document within one working day.

Institutional Head

The Institutional Head will meet with the inmate within five calendar days of receipt of the SIUCC documentation to discuss:

  1. the inmate’s reasons for refusing to transfer out of the SIU and alternatives
  2. the delay in implementing the decision and plan.

Following the meeting with the inmate, the Institutional Head will ensure:

  1. the results of the meeting are documented in the SIU application
  2. efforts continue to transfer the inmate out of the SIU as soon as possible.

Changes to Interim Policy Bulletin 679 (november 15, 2021)

Responsibilities - Regional Headquarters

Paragraph 71 has been amended to change the frequency requirements of the SIU compliance reports at non-SIU sites from annually to once every two years.

Previous Direction Current Direction
  1. The Regional Deputy Commissioner will:
    1. participate as a member of the Health Committee established by the Commissioner pursuant to subsection 37.31(3) of the CCRA, in all cases where an inmate within their region is referred to the Committee pursuant to subsection 37.32(1) of the CCRA
    2. ensure SIU compliance reports are completed a minimum of once annually, which will include:
      1. on-site visits to SIU and non-SIU sites
      2. an overall compliance assessment with SIU policy and regional action plans for non-compliance.
  1. The Regional Deputy Commissioner will:
    1. participate as a member of the Health Committee established by the Commissioner in all cases where an inmate within their region is referred to the Committee in accordance with subsection 37.32(1) of the CCRA
    2. ensure SIU compliance reports are completed:
      1. annually at each SIU site, which will include an on-site visit
      2. once every two years at non-SIU sites.

Exceptions

The previous policy direction has been amended to remove the official language requirements and to clarify that all reasonable efforts must be made to meet the legislated obligation to provide inmates in SIUs, or subject to restricted movement, with opportunities to interact with others as well as to be outside their cell.

Previous Direction Current Direction
Following authorization of an exception, the Institutional Head will ensure:
  1. the exception and the reasons for it are documented in both official languages in the SIU-LTE Module
  2. the written reasons for the exception are given to the inmate, in the official language of their choice, as soon as practicable, but no later than the same day the exception is authorized
  3. all reasonable efforts are made to meet the legislated obligation to provide inmates in SIUs or subject to restricted movement with opportunities to be outside of their cell
  4. the need for an exception is continually evaluated and, should the circumstances change and the exception is no longer required, the exception is immediately discontinued
  5. the exception authorization is reviewed and documented in writing in both official languages in the SIU LTE Module at a minimum once every seven calendar days
  6. SIU routines return to normal operations as soon as it is safe to do so in consideration of CD 254 - Occupational Safety and Health and Return to Work Programs and GL 254‑1 - Occupational Health and Safety Program.
Following authorization of an exception, the Institutional Head will ensure:
  1. the exception and the reasons for it are documented in the SIU application
  2. the written reasons for the exception are given to the inmates as soon as practicable, but no later than the end of the day the exception is authorized
  3. all reasonable efforts are made to meet the legislated obligation to provide inmates in SIUs, or subject to restricted movement, with opportunities to be outside of their cell and to interact with others
  4. the need for an exception is continually evaluated and, should the circumstances change and the exception is no longer required, the exception is immediately discontinued
  5. the exception authorization is reviewed and documented in writing in the SIU application at a minimum once every seven calendar days, and
  6. SIU routines return to normal operations as soon as it is safe to do so in consideration of CD 254 - Occupational Safety and Health and Return to Work Programs and GL 254‑1 - Occupational Health and Safety Program.

Annex B - SIU Case Conference (SIUCC) Correctional Plan Update (CPU) Content Guidelines

An SIU case conference (SIUCC) must be undertaken in circumstances where an inmate refuses to transfer out of an SIU or where there is a delay in transferring an inmate out of an SIU following a decision, by a designated CSC decision maker or an IEDM, that an inmate should not remain in an SIU. The purpose of an SIUCC is to ensure that an inmate’s progress, as well as plans to transfer the inmate out of the SIU continue to be reviewed and assessed. The Deputy Warden will facilitate the case conference and ensure all Case Management Team members attend.

The following SIUCC Correctional Plan Update (CPU) content guidelines have been added to include documentation requirements following an SIUCC.

SIUCC Attendance

Discussion of Alternatives and Plan to Transfer the Inmate out of the SIU

Inmate Comments

Programs/Interventions

Health Care Comments

Security Intelligence Comments

Required Actions

Contact

Strategic Policy Division

Policy-Politiques.GEN-NHQ@csc-scc.gc.ca

Commissioner,

Anne Kelly

Page details

Date modified: