Budget 2024 and Finance Issues Raised in Parliament

Bank of Canada Negative Equity

Issue

Bank of Canada losses and negative equity may be raised during the Deputy Minister's appearance before the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance (NFFN).

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers:

1. Do you have a breakdown of the net losses of the Bank of Canada according to their latest annual report?

2. How did the Bank of Canada get into a negative equity position?

3. What is the government doing to help the Bank of Canada exit their negative equity position?

Canada Disability Benefit (CDB)

Issue

Media coverage and stakeholder reaction regarding the Budget 2024 announcement of the Canada Disability Benefit generally reflected disappointment relative to expectations, in particular regarding the maximum amount of $2,400 and using the Disability Tax Credit (DTC) certificate as a basis to determine eligibility.

Key points

Background

Amendments in the Budget Implementation Act 2024, No. 1 / Bill C-69

The bill would make amendments to several acts (the Federal Courts Act, Tax Court of Canada Act and the Department of Employment and Social Development Act) regarding the appeals process to help launch the CDB.

Budget 2024 announcement

The proposed design is based on a maximum yearly amount of $2,400 for low-income persons with disabilities age 18 to 64. To deliver the benefit as quickly as possible and ensure nation-wide consistency of eligibility, the CDB would be available to people with a valid DTC certificate. As proposed, it would benefit an estimated more than 600,000 persons with disabilities.

Forthcoming draft regulations will provide more details. There will be meaningful and barrier-free opportunities to collaborate during the regulatory process and ensure the benefit is reflective of the needs of those receiving it. Persons with disabilities will be consulted on key design elements, including maximum income thresholds and phase-out rates. The benefit design will need to fit the investment proposed in Budget 2024.

Selected post-Budget statements by the government

The Prime Minister stated: "...the CDB is a milestone in our strong and unwavering commitment to creating an inclusive Canada. There is always more to do, but $6.1 billion over the coming years is going to make a difference in the lives of some of Canada's most vulnerable. Hundreds of dollars a month, tax-free, will help with the cost of living. We recognize there is more to do. We will be working with province and territories to make sure, first of all, that this disability money is not clawed back, and secondly, that we can do even more in partnership provinces and territories for Canadians."

"This government has recognized for many years that Canadians living with disabilities are facing challenges and disadvantages in our economy and in our communities. That's why we've stepped up regularly over the past years with initiatives to reduce barriers in Canada. We are now moving forward with the CDB at the cost of $6 billion over the coming years, to put hundreds of dollars a month tax-free in to the pockets of individuals with disability. The reality is there is always more to do, but this will help." – Question Period, April 17.

The Deputy Prime Minister stated: "On the disability benefit, this is the first time in the history of Canada that a federal government has put forward a disability benefit. That is a milestone. It's a good thing. It's the right thing to do. It's important to get it right and it is complicated. It's complicated when it comes to working with provinces and territories. When you're laying the foundation for something big, you want to do it properly. We absolutely aspire to do more and we see this as just the first step but an important first step."  - News Conference, April 30.

The Minister of Diversity, Inclusion and Persons with Disabilities is quoted: 'defended the plan as a "major milestone" and a "key benefit," but conceded it is a "starting point." "There's always more to do but…, if you look at the budget this is the largest single item that you will see, $6.1 billion…," she said.'– CTV News, April 17.

Significant existing supports under the Disability Inclusion Action Plan

Capital Gains Inclusion Rate

Issue

Budget 2024 proposed to increase the capital gains inclusion rate from one half to two thirds for corporations and trusts, and from one half to two thirds on the portion of capital gains realized in the year that exceed $250,000 for individuals, for capital gains realized on or after June 25, 2024.

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

How much revenue would this measure generate?

It is estimated that it would generate $19.4 billion over five years, including $6.9 billion in 2024-25.

Would provincial tax revenues also be affected?

Yes, for provinces and territories harmonized with the federal tax base. The province of Québec has also indicated that it intends to harmonize with the federal policy. The Department estimates that provincial revenues could represent up to 60 per cent of federal revenues.

Why is the revenue impact so large in the earlier years and almost nil in the third year?

The capital gains accelerated and reported prior to June 25 are assumed to be gains that otherwise would have been realized in 2025, 2026 and later years. The "pull-forward" of these gains therefore reduces capital gains revenues in future years by assumption.

How many taxpayers would be affected by this measure?

Only 40,000 Canadians with an average income of $1.4 million are expected to pay more personal income tax on their capital gains in any given year.

This number does not include individuals who may be impacted via greater tax paid by a corporation they own or trust of which they are a beneficiary.

Why is this change effective on June 25?

This change gives taxpayers several weeks to determine how to arrange their affairs prior to the new rules taking effect. It also provides time for many taxpayers with transactions underway on Budget Day to conclude them before the transaction takes effect. Taxpayers would have been worse off if the changes had been instead made effective as of Budget Day.

How would employee stock options be affected?

Claimants of the employee stock option deduction would be provided a one-third deduction of the taxable benefit to reflect the new capital gains inclusion rate, but would be entitled to a deduction of one half the taxable benefit up to a combined limit of $250,000 for both employee stock options and capital gains.

How would physicians be affected?

The higher inclusion rate is based on the amount of capital gains reported annually, not occupation.

Canadians, including incorporated physicians, will continue to have access to various tax-sheltered accounts, including Registered Retirement Savings Plans and Tax-Free Savings Accounts. In some cases, physicians may find it advantageous to hold capital assets personally (i.e., not in the corporation) to benefit from the $250,000 threshold annually.

When will the government release more details about the proposed rules?

Additional design details will be released shortly. The legislative process will begin before Parliament rises for the summer break.

Background

Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption (LCGE)

Budget 2024 proposed to increase the LCGE to apply to up to $1.25 million of eligible capital gains. This measure would apply to dispositions that occur on or after June 25, 2024. Indexation of the LCGE would resume in 2026.

Canadian Entrepreneurs' Incentive (CEI)

Budget 2024 also proposed to introduce the Canadian Entrepreneurs' Incentive (CEI). This incentive would reduce the tax rate on capital gains on the disposition of qualifying shares by an eligible individual. Specifically, this incentive would provide for a capital gains inclusion rate that is one half the prevailing inclusion rate, on up to $2 million in capital gains per individual over their lifetime.

The lifetime limit would be phased in by increments of $200,000 per year, beginning on January 1, 2025, before ultimately reaching a value of $2 million by January 1, 2034.

Under the two-thirds capital gains inclusion rate proposed in Budget 2024, this measure would result in an inclusion rate of one third for qualifying dispositions. This measure would apply in addition to any available capital gains exemption.

Computation of the $250,000 Threshold

Any capital gains eligible for the CEI, the LCGE, as well as any capital gains offset by capital losses of prior years, would not be included in the computation of an individual's $250,000 limit and would therefore not be subject to the two thirds inclusion rate.

Government Contracting

Issue

Recent changes have been made to procurement practices to meet evolving requirements and ensure greater oversight and controls over procurement activities within the Department. These changes are also in response to the recent audit findings in audits conducted by the Office of the Comptroller General (OCG) and the Office of the Procurement Ombudsman (OPO) on McKinsey contracts, the OAG audit findings on ArriveCAN as well as current scrutiny from the public and parliamentary committees around the procurement function.

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. How many contracts with McKinsey has the Department of Finance awarded since January 2011.

The Department of Finance identified one contract with McKinsey since January 1, 2011. The contract was awarded on June 22, 2011. The total contract value was $743,000, including taxes, and was to assist the Task Force for the Payments System Review in transforming the various inputs and analyses into a coherent statement about the preferred future for the payments system in Canada (Conceptual Framework for the Evolution of the Canadian Payments System). The independent Task Force, announced in Budget 2010, was appointed by the Government to conduct a comprehensive review of the Canadian payments system and make recommendations to the then Minister of Finance. The task force was asked to review the safety, soundness and efficiency of the payments system; whether there was sufficient innovation in the system; the competitive landscape; whether businesses and consumers were being well served; and whether current payment system oversight mechanisms remained appropriate.

2. How many contracts with Dalian and/or Coradix has the Department of Finance awarded since January 2011.

The Department of Finance identified one contract with Dalian since January 1, 2011. The contract was awarded by Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC), on the department's behalf, on March 22, 2012. The total contract value was $216,351.25, including taxes, and was to provide proxy appliances for the department's computer network. The proxy appliances were routers that acted as an "intermediary" between FIN employees and the internet to help prevent cyber-attacks on the Department's networks.

Background

The Department's total contracting activity for Fiscal Year 2023-24 represented 112 contracts and amendments valued over $10K for a total of $8,995,684. This amount includes contracts awarded by FIN and by PSPC or SSC on the Department's behalf.  The Department's contracting activity specific to Professional Services is below.

Table 1
Department's total contracting activity for Fiscal Year 2023-24

Description

Transactions

Value

Language Training

6

$1,008,384

HR, Business and Economic Professional Services

10

$986,942

Public Opinion Research

2

$236,679

Communications Professional Services

4

$147,340

Management Consulting

3

$102,830

Translation Services

2

$88,804

IT Consultants

2

$74,591

Protection Services

2

$67,550

IT data destruction and credit rating verification

3

$45,968

Temporary Help Services

1

$39,917

Accounting and Audit Services

1

$39,550

Hospitality

1

$23,600

Total

37

$2,862,155

Note: Values reflect contracting activity, not expenditures.

Consumer-Driven Banking

Issue

In Budget 2024, the government announced that it would introduce Canada's Consumer-Driven Banking Framework to regulate access to financial data. The framework will provide Canadians and small businesses safe and secure access to financial services and products that help them manage and improve their finances, as well as providing a solution to the risks posed by screen scraping. The framework is being introduced in two parts, with elements of governance, scope and technical standards being included in BIA 1 and the remaining pieces including accreditation and common rules for privacy, liability and security to follow in BIA2. 

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. Why isn't the whole framework being included in Budget Implementation Act 1?  

Introducing foundational elements of the framework in BIA1 will give clarity to stakeholders on governance, scope, and technical standards, areas where there is broad alignment, while also providing the FCAC time to prepare and build capacity for its expanded supervisory mandate.

Introducing these key elements early in the Budget Implementation process will also give industry more time to build toward implementation readiness while the Department of Finance continues to engage with stakeholders to refine more complex elements, such as the accreditation framework and common rules for privacy, security, and liability, to be introduced in BIA2. 

2. Why was the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada chosen to oversee consumer-driven banking in Canada?

The decision to name the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada (FCAC) was informed by an extensive review of international jurisdictions and is in line with international best practices. It will ensure Canadians benefit from effective government oversight of financial data sharing.

As an existing consumer protection and market conduct regulator for the financial sector, the FCAC is well placed to oversee an expanded mandate while minimizing cost to government for initial setup of the framework, and reducing the complexity and time required to establish the framework. 

Consumer-driven banking enables and empowers consumers to use their own financial data to make more informed financial decisions. The FCAC's existing financial literacy and consumer education mandate make it well placed to help guide consumers who engage in consumer-driven banking.

3. Why wasn't the FCAC provided more funding in Budget 2024?

The Government is providing $1 million initially to FCAC so the agency can prepare for its new responsibilities and to begin development of a consumer awareness campaign. This planning will involve a resource assessment to determine whether additional funding would be required to implement the framework.

The FCAC will transition to a full cost-recovery basis once the framework is in place.

4. How would a federal regulator oversee provincial entities such as credit unions?

To facilitate oversight of provincial entities while respecting jurisdiction, the governance model will permit provincial entities to "opt-in" to participation and be subject to supervision for adherence to common rules by the FCAC for the purpose of consumer-driven banking only.

Once in the framework, all entities will be required to adhere to the common rules. This is with a view to establishing a pan-Canadian system, where all Canadians have equal access and protections, and all participants are subject to and follow the same rules.

Provincial governments will retain the ability to impose additional rules on credit unions.

As work on the legislative framework evolves, the government will continue to work with provincial and territorial governments to address any potential barriers to participation.

5. Wouldn't this create a two-tiered system if a provincial government elected not to allow their credit unions and caisses populaires to participate?

The goal of the framework is to establish one system for all entities and, for Canadians, with a view to ensuring that all Canadians have equal access and protections when sharing their financial data.

The government will continue to work with provincial policy makers and regulators to ensure alignment with existing jurisdiction, avoid duplication and to ensure that credit unions and caisses populaires will not face additional federal barriers to participation in the system.

The Government of Canada is committed to respecting the jurisdiction of provinces, including their right to impose additional rules on their participating entities. 

6. Is the federal oversight of provincially-regulated entities for the purpose of participation in CDB constitutional?

The goal of the framework is to establish one system for all entities and, for Canadians, with a view to ensuring that all Canadians have equal access and protections when sharing their financial data.

An opt-in model for provincially regulated credit unions and caisses populaires was deemed the best means of establishing robust oversight, while respecting provincial jurisdiction.

The government will continue to work with provinces to avoid duplication, ensure alignment with existing jurisdiction and to build a Canadian framework for consumer-driven banking that benefits and protects all Canadians equally.

There are existing examples of a blending of jurisdictional responsibility for some aspects of financial institution oversight, for example the administration of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act.

Background

Consumer-driven banking, also known as open banking or consumer-directed finance, refers to frameworks that allow consumers and small businesses to securely transfer their financial data through an application programming interface (API) to approved service providers of their choice. Consumer-driven banking enables consumers to securely use data-driven financial services that can help them better manage their finances and improve their financial outcomes.

For example, through consumer-driven banking, people could access services that allow them to build their credit by reporting their on-time rental payments to credit bureaus, making it easier to qualify for a mortgage.

The 2023 Fall Economic Statement committed the Government of Canada introducing a consumer-driven banking framework through Budget 2024. BIA1 of 2024 introduces implementation legislation for key components of the consumer-driven banking framework, namely governance, scope, and criteria and process for the technical standard. Remaining elements are to follow in legislation through the BIA2.

In line with international best practices, the legislation will expand the mandate of the FCAC to include oversight of consumer-driven banking and establish foundational framework elements related to scope, system participation, safeguards in respect of integrity and national security, and common rules covering privacy, liability, and security.

In addition, the principles and process for the selection of a single technical standard for data sharing will ensure the standard is fair, open, and accessible. This will ensure that the framework meets key public policy objectives for a Canadian consumer-driven banking system, including interoperability with the coming American framework overseen by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The development of Canada's Consumer-Driven Banking Framework has been guided by three public policy objectives:

These policy objectives have guided the development of the government's course of action on six core framework elements, including: 

Canada' Consumer-Driven Banking Framework was informed by a series of expert-led recommendations, engagement with other jurisdictions, and extensive consultation with banks, credit unions, financial technology companies, consumer advocacy groups, and Canadians across the country.

Debt Management Strategy

Issue

The government released the Debt Management Strategy (DMS) as part of Budget 2024. The DMS outlined the government's borrowing plan for 2024-25 and announced a series of policy measures intended to support the debt program.

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

Debt Management Strategy (DMS 2024)

1. Why did the government's borrowing needs increase relative to last year?

2. What are the forecasts for debt service charges?

3. Will increased borrowing cause Canada to breach the Parliamentary Borrowing Authority?

4. Will the increase in borrowings impact Canada's AAA credit rating?

5. How do you see Canada's debt program evolving over the next few years?

6. Why is the government introducing a 1-month treasury bill (t-bill)?

Maximum Borrowing Amount

7. What is the Borrowing Authority Act (BAA)?

8. Why is the government amending the Borrowing Authority Act?

Borrowing Authority Report

9. What is the Borrowing Authority Act Report and when will it be published?

ESG/Green Bonds

10. What was the rationale for including nuclear energy in Canada's Green Bond Framework?

Annex 1
Projected Gross Issuance1 of Domestic Bonds and Bills for 2024-25
billions of dollars, end of fiscal year
2022-23
Actual
2023-24
Actual
2024-25
Planned
Treasury bills 202 267 272
2-year 67 86 88
3-year 20 6 0
5-year 31 47 60
10-year 52 47 60
30-year 14 14 16
Green bonds - 4 4
Total bonds 185 204 228
Total gross issuance2 387 471 500
Share of Long Bonds (10-Year +) to Total Bonds 36% 30% 33%
Share of Treasury bills to Total Issuance 52% 57% 54%

Notes: Numbers may not add due to rounding.
1 Issuance subject to expenditure availability and market conditions.
2 Total issuance includes real-return bonds and the Ukraine Sovereignty Bond.
Sources: Bank of Canada; Department of Finance Canada calculations

Annex 2 – Calculation of the Borrowing Authority Act Maximum Borrowing Amount ($ billions)

Estimated Total Debt Stock at March 31, 2024: $1,710
Incremental Government Borrowings until March 2027: $331
Net Increase of Canada Mortgage Bonds until March 2027: $72*
Incremental Agent Crown Corporation Borrowings until 2027: $9
5% Prudence Buffer: $106

Pre-Double Counting Adjustment, BAA Max Amount: $2,228

Double Counting Adjustment:      
Incremental CMBs purchased by government until March 2027: ($97.5)**
5% Prudence Buffer adjustment: ($ 4.9)

Post-Double Counting Adjustment, BAA Max Amount: $2,126

*This reflects gross CMB issuance of $180B, including the $90B to be purchased by the government, and subtracts maturities of $108B.
**This includes $7.5 billion CMBs purchased by the government in February and March 2024.

Projected Deficits

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. The government has benefited from a significant uplift in its revenue outlook since the COVID crisis and has managed to spend it all. According to the PBO, the total uplift has been $241.9 billion and total spending $251.6 billion beginning with Budget 2021.

During and since the COVID crisis, the government has consistently invested in Canadians and the Canadian economy, which has consistently outperformed expectations.

The strong economic performance has lifted government revenues, which has, in turn, allowed the government to continue investing in Canadians and the economy while keeping on track with its fiscal anchor of lowering the federal debt-to-GDP ratio over the medium term.

Indeed, the government has taken a prudent and responsible approach to fiscal policy, maintaining Canada's significant fiscal advantage relative to its G7 peers while making substantial investments in areas like child care, housing and the green transition.

2. Last year, the year-to-date budgetary balance as of February was a $3.1 billion surplus and the government ended the year with a $35.3-billion deficit. This year, the government is already running a $17.3-billion deficit as of February, but has committed to a deficit no larger than $40 billion for the year. This does not seem likely.

Last year, the government incurred several large, anticipated expenses late in the year that are either not expected to be repeated this year, or are expected to be substantially lower. These expenses included the $2.7 billion Grocery Rebate, $2.0 billion Canada Health Transfer top-up, and those associated with Indigenous claims.

Realizing a $40-billion is not a certainty, but provided revenues maintain their recent momentum, it is achievable.

Table 2
Budgetary Balance
  2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029
Budget 2023 -43.0 -40.1 -35.0 -26.8 -15.8 -14.0  
%GDP -1.5 -1.4 -1.2 -0.9 -0.5 -0.4  
FES 2023 -35.3 -40.0 -38.4 -38.3 -27.1 -23.8 -18.4
%GDP -1.3 -1.4 -1.3 -1.2 -0.8 -0.7 -0.5
Budget 2024 -35.3 -40.0 -39.8 -38.9 -30.8 -26.8 -20.0
%GDP -1.3 -1.4 -1.3 -1.2 -0.9 -0.8 -0.6
Difference $billions              
From FES 2023 0.0 0.0 -1.4 -0.6 -3.7 -3.0 -1.6
From Budget 2023 7.7 0.1 -4.8 -12.1 -15.0 -12.8  

Economic Growth Comparisons – G7

Issue

How Canada compares to its G7 peers on key macroeconomic metrics.

Key points

Background

Table 3
G7 Employment Change Since February 2020
(per cent)
  Latest
Canada 6.1
France 5.0
Italy 3.5
Germany 3.2
U.S. 1.8
U.K. 0.7
Japan 0.0

Notes: Last data points are April 2024 (U.S.), March 2024 (Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan), 2023Q4 (U.K., France). Compares to the level of February 2020, except for France and the UK (2019Q4).
Source: Haver Analytics.

Table 4
G7 Headline CPI Inflation
(y/y, per cent)
  February March* April
U.S. 3.2 3.5 --
U.K. 3.4 3.2 --
Canada 2.8 2.9  --
Japan 2.8 2.7 --
France 3.0 2.3 2.2
Germany 2.5 2.2 2.2
Italy 0.8 1.2 0.9

*ranked by March

Table 5
Employment Rate (15 to 64)
  2020-21 actual results 2021-22 actual results 2022-23 actual results 2023-24 actual results
Rate (%) 70.1 73.5 75.6 75.8
Ranking among OECD 19th in the OECD (2020 calendar year) 14th in the OECD (2021 calendar year) 12th in the OECD (2022 calendar year) 12th in the OECD (2023 calendar year)
Table 6
G7 Real GDP Growth
  %, quarterly change at annual rate % change
  2023Q1 2023Q2 2023Q3 2023Q4 2024Q1 19Q4-20Q2 19Q4-23Q4
U.S. 2.2 2.1 4.9 3.4 1.6 -9.1 8.2
Canada 2.6 0.6 -0.5 1.0 -- -12.7 4.4
Italy 1.7 -0.7 1.4 0.5 1.2 -17.1 4.2
Japan 4.0 4.2 -3.2 0.4 -- -7.3 3.1
France -0.1 2.6 0.3 0.5 0.9 -17.8 1.9
U.K. 0.7 0.0 -0.5 -1.2 -- -22.5 1.0
Germany 1.1 -0.3 0.6 -2.0 0.9 -10.8 0.1

*Ranked by 19Q4 to 23Q4 growth

Table 7
G7 Real GDP per Capita Growth
  %, quarterly change at annual rate % change*
  23Q2 23Q3 23Q4 19Q4-23Q4
U.S. 1.6 4.2 2.8 6.7
Italy -0.4 1.5 0.5 5.6
Japan 4.2 -2.5 - 4.3
France 2.2 -0.1 0.1 0.5
U.K. -0.8 -1.5 -2.2 -1.5
Germany -0.7 0.2 -2.4 -1.7
Canada -1.8 -4.0 -3.2 -2.5

*Ranked by 19Q4 to 23Q4 growth. Data for Japan ends in 2023Q3. Constant US$, OECD PPP.

Table 8
G7 GDP per Capita Levels
2003 2022*
  Level ($US) Relative to US Level ($US) Relative to US
U.S. 39,418 100 77,176 100
Germany 30,322 77 66,500 86
Canada 32,393 82 62,160 81
France 28,217 72 57,160 74
U.K. 30,302 77 56,742 74
Italy 29,173 74 55,863 72
Japan - - 47,201 61

*Ranked by 2022 level. Current US$, OECD PPP.

Table 9
G7 Real GDP Growth
(%) Forecasts by IMF
    Current Projection*
  2023 2024 2025
Canada 1.1 1.2 2.3
U.S. 2.5 2.7 1.9
France 0.9 0.7 1.4
U.K. 0.1 0.5 1.5
Germany -0.3 0.2 1.3
Italy 0.9 0.7 0.7
Japan 1.9 0.9 1.0

*Ranked by 2025 projection
IMF World Economic Outlook (April 2024)

Table 10
G7 Productivity Change 2019-2022
(per cent)
  Latest
U.S. 4.3
Germany 2.3
U.K. 2.2
Canada 1.8
Japan 1.5
Italy 1.0
France -3.3

*Based on constant US$, OECD PPP.

Chart 1
Productivity Gap with US, G7, 2022
Chart 1: Productivity Gap with US, G7, 2022

*Based on constant US$, OECD PPP.

Text version
Country Gap with US
United States 0%
Germany -9%
France -14%
United Kingdom -20%
Italy -28%
Canada -29%
Japan -36%
Chart 2
Business-sector Productivity, Canada and US (2019 Q4 = 100)
Chart 2: Business-sector Productivity, Canada and US (2019 Q4 = 100)

*Based on constant dollars in respective currencies.

Text version
Quarter Canada US
2019 Q4 100 100
2020 Q1 105.0 99.9
2020 Q2 118.6 105.3
2020 Q3 106.8 106.3
2020 Q4 104.7 105.1
2021 Q1 103.5 105.8
2021 Q2 102.3 105.8
2021 Q3 101.5 105.2
2021 Q4 100.8 105.9
2022 Q1 101.8 104.3
2022 Q2 101.8 103.2
2022 Q3 101.7 103.2
2022 Q4 100.7 103.9
2023 Q1 100.0 103.8
2023 Q2 99.8 104.5
2023 Q3 99.2 105.7
2023 Q4 99.7 106.6

Housing Affordability and Immigration Growth

Issue

High home prices, rising rents, and elevated mortgage rates have caused a deterioration in housing affordability in Canada. Lack of supply and rapid population growth due to immigration remain key issues.  

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

How did the Government come to its estimate of 3.87 million homes to be created through its Housing Plan?

Background

The government continues to invest heavily in housing, including through the measures below.

Budget 2024

2023 Fall Economic Statement

Other Recent Initiatives

Further details on how to achieve the 5 per cent target will be announced this fall as part of the Immigration Levels Plan 2025-2027, which will be expanded to include specific targets for temporary residents, in addition to regular planning for permanent residents.

Budget 2024 - Major Transfers to Provinces and Territories in 2024-25

Issue

In 2024-25, major transfers to other levels of government will be $99.4 billion.

Key points

Anticipated Areas of Questioning

1. How was the envelope of the 2024-25 Canada Health Transfer (CHT) determined? 

2. What were the main drivers of the legislated growth in determining the 2024-25 major transfer payments?

3. What is the timeline for the renewal of Equalization?

4. What is the Equalization floor payment for 2024-25?

5. Will the Government be initiating a review of the CST, as promised in Budget 2012?

Background

Major Transfers to Other Levels of Government in 2024-25:

Canada Health Transfer ($52.1 billion): The CHT is the largest federal transfer program, providing long-term, predictable funding for health care.

Canada Social Transfer (CST) ($16.9 billion): The CST is a federal transfer that is provided in support of social assistance and social services, post-secondary education, and programs for children.

Equalization ($25.3 billion): Equalization ensures that less prosperous provinces have sufficient revenue to provide reasonably comparable levels of public services at reasonably comparable levels of taxation.

Territorial Formula Financing (TFF) ($5.2 billion): TFF funding enables territorial governments to provide their residents with programs and services comparable to those provided in the rest of Canada.

Table 11
Major Transfers 2023-24 and 2024-25 (Entitlement Basis)
($ millions)
2023-24 NL PE NS NB QC ON MB SK AB BC NU NT YT Total
CHT 665 214 1,305 1,029 10,939 19,242 1,794 1,490 5,782 6,800 50 55 55 49,421
CST 221 71 434 342 3,634 6,392 596 495 1,921 2,259 17 18 18 16,416
Equalization 0 561 2,803 2,631 14,037 421 3,510 0 0 0 0 0 0 23,963
TFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,971 1,611 1,252 4,834
Total 886 847 4,541 4,002 28,610 26,054 5,900 1,985 7,703 9,058 2,038 1,685 1,326 94,634
2024-25 NL PE NS NB QC ON MB SK AB BC NU NT YT Total
CHT 688 228 1,379 1,085 11,455 20,289 1,889 1,565 6,164 7,172 52 57 58 52,081
CST 223 74 448 352 3,719 6,587 613 508 2,001 2,329 17 19 19 16,909
Equalization 218 610 3,284 2,897 13,316 576 4,352 0 0 0 0 0 0 25,253
TFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,109 1,699 1,350 5,159
Total 1,130 911 5,111 4,335 28,490 27,451 6,854 2,073 8,165 9,501 2,178 1,775 1,427 99,401
Change NL PE NS NB QC ON MB SK AB BC NU NT YT Total
CHT 23 14 74 56 516 1,047 95 75 382 373 1 2 3 2,660 (5.4%)
CST 3 3 14 11 85 195 17 13 81 70 0 0 0 492 (3.0%)
Equalization 218 48 481 266 -721 155 843 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,289 (5.4%)
TFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 138 89 98 325 (6.7%)
Total 244 65 569 333 -120 1,397 955 88 463 443 139 90 101 4,767 (5.0%)

CHT and CST 2023-24 represent the second estimation. CHT and CST 2024-25 represent the first estimation.

Totals may not add due to rounding.

Excludes other fiscal arrangements: Statutory Subsisdies, Québec Abatement, Fiscal Stabilization, Nova Scotia Offset, CHT top-up, Transit and Housing, Safe return to Class, Safe Long-Term Care, Canada-wide ELCC, Home Care and Mental Health, Canada Cities and Communities Fund, Hibernia Dividend Backed Annuity Agreements with Newfoundland and Labrador, and Deduction/Reimbursements related to the Canada Health Act.

Mortgage Delinquencies

Issue

Higher interest rates are making it more difficult for some Canadians to make their mortgage payments.

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. How are mortgage borrowers coping with higher interest rates?

2. What is the government doing to support mortgage borrowers experiencing financial hardship?

Background

Price on Pollution and the Canada Carbon Rebates

Issue

The federal carbon pollution pricing system applies in all jurisdictions that request it or do not have their own pollution pricing system that meets the federal benchmark. The federal government must return all direct proceeds from the federal pollution pricing system within the jurisdiction where they were collected.  

Key points

Anticipated Questions and Answers

1. When would eligible businesses receive the new Canada Carbon Rebate for Small Businesses?

2. Why is it proposed to deliver pollution pricing proceeds to small- and medium-sized businesses in this manner?

3. How many businesses would be expected to benefit from the Canada Carbon Rebate for Small Businesses, and how much could they receive, on average?

4. What does the federal carbon pollution pricing system cost households?

Table 13
Average Canada Carbon Rebate (CCR) Net Benefit for 2024-25, annually per household
($)
2024-25 AB MB ON SK NB NS PEI NL
Average Cost Impacts per Household 1,056 828 869 1,156 536 609 628 859
Average CCR per Household 1,779 1,193 1,124 1,505 719 766 801 1,162
Average Net Benefit 723 365 255 349 183 157 173 303

Notes:
Estimates assume full pass-through from businesses to consumers, and may change as output-based standards (in particular, for fossil fuel-fired electricity) are adjusted. Estimates are calculated using internal proceeds forecasts, modelling from Finance, information from Statistics Canada, and modelling inputs from ECCC, assuming a coming-into-force date of April 1, 2024. The household impact estimates are not available beyond 2024-25 due to data and modelling limitations.

5. What are the total payments the government estimates to make under the CCR in 2024-25?

Table 14
CCR to be paid in 2024-25, by province
(in $ millions)
  AB SK ON MB NS NB PE NL TOTAL
CCR 3,024 692 6,400 640 341 251 54 263 11,665

6. Is Saskatchewan paying the fuel charge on natural gas in 2024-25? Will Saskatchewan residents stop getting the Canada Carbon Rebate?

7. What amendments are being made to the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (GGPPA)?

8. Why was the fuel charge temporarily removed only from heating oil and not also from all heating fuels, including natural gas or propane?

9. What is the Government of Canada doing with the proceeds that are not returned to households?

Table 15
Specified amounts to be returned to Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), by province
($ millions)
  NL PEI NS NB ON MB SK AB Total
2019-20 n/a n/a n/a n/a 81.4 13.2 27.0 n/a 121.6
2020-21 n/a n/a n/a n/a 205.9 27.0 64.7 159.2 456.8
2021-22 n/a n/a n/a n/a 239.7 22.4 61.9 142.1 466.1
2022-23 n/a n/a n/a n/a 299.9 28.3 82.3 179.5 590
2023-24 20.1 4.4 28.5 17.1 509.3 53.0 64.7 237.4 934.5
2024-25 14.1 2.9 18.3 13.4 338.6 34.3 42 159.5 623.1
Total  34.2 7.3 46.8 30.5 1674.8 178.2 342.6 877.7 3192.1

Background

Returning Proceeds to Small- and Medium-sized Businesses

In the 2021 Economic and Fiscal Update, the government first announced its intention to return a portion of the proceeds from the price on pollution directly to small and medium-sized businesses in backstop jurisdictions through new federal programming. Prior to this, these proceeds were delivered through the Climate Action Incentive Fund, to which eligible small- and medium-sized businesses could apply to receive funding for energy-saving projects.

Budget 2022 announced that the approach would be to deliver "direct payments to support emission-intensive, trade-exposed small and medium-sized enterprises", and that Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) would be responsible for this.

However, the approach to focus on emissions-intensive and trade-exposed businesses proved challenging from an implementation and administration perspective, and ECCC was not able to set up a federal program.

The Canadian Federation of Independent Businesses (CFIB) expressed a strong desire for fuel charge proceeds to be returned as quickly as possible, and a preference for targeting all small- and medium-sized businesses via the tax system, rather than just those that are emissions-intensive and trade-exposed.

GGPPA Amendments

Bill C-69 would amend the GGPPA to expand the information sharing provisions under the fuel charge in specific, limited circumstances.

Specifically, it would enable federal officials to provide other federal officials with confidential information in respect of a provincial Crown, or its provincial Crown agent, for the purposes of evaluating and formulating a response if the province or its agent is non-compliant or has stated that it will not comply with the federal fuel charge.

This measure would also allow the public disclosure by the Minister of National Revenue of certain information in respect of a provincial Crown, or its provincial Crown agent, that is non-compliant or has publicly stated that it will not comply with the federal fuel charge. 

This proposal would facilitate government communications in respect of a provincial Crown or its agent that is non-compliant or has stated that it will not comply with the federal fuel charge. 

This proposal would come into force on the date on which the enacting legislation receives Royal Assent.  

Canada Carbon Rebate (CCR)

The CCR amount that an individual or family is entitled to is based on place of residence and family composition (See Table 4 below for annual CCR amounts for a family of four in 2024-25). Household income and household fuel consumption do not affect the CCR amount to which an individual or family is entitled.

In addition to the base rebate amount, a rural supplement is provided to those residing outside a Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) as per the most recent Census published in the year prior to the base year for the CCR calculation.

To further recognize rural Canadians' higher energy needs and their more limited access to cleaner transportation options, the government is proposing, through legislative amendments in Bill C-59, to double the rural supplement from 10 per cent to 20 per cent of the base rebate amount, starting in April 2024.

To ensure that all those who are residing in a community that has previously been eligible for the rural supplement remain eligible, the government is also proposing, through legislative amendments in Bill C-59, to continue to use the CMA determinations based on the 2016 Census for the 2024-25 and 2025-26 fiscal years.

As announced in Budget 2024, the government is also working to further expand rural supplement eligibility to more Canadians who need this support and will announce a proposal on better defining rural areas later this year.    

Table 16
Annual Canada Carbon Rebate Amounts, 2024-25
AB SK MB ON NB NS PEI1 NL
Family of Four $1,800 $1,504 $1,200 $1,120 $760 $824 $880 $1,192
Rural2 $2,160 $1,804.80 $1,440 $1,344 $912 $988.80 $880 $1,430.40

1 Amounts for all provinces, except PEI, do not include the rural supplement. As all residents in PEI are considered to be living in a rural or small community, they are receiving the same CCR amount.
2 The rural amounts for 2024-25 reflect the proposed 20-per-cent rural supplement.

Heating Oil

On October 23, 2023, the Prime Minister announced a temporary three-year pause of the fuel charge under Part 1 of the GGPPA on deliveries of heating oil used exclusively for providing heat to a home, building or similar structure, effective November 9, 2023.

As of April 1, 2027, deliveries of light fuel oil for use as heating oil will once again be subject to the applicable fuel charge at that time – 33.42 cents per litre.

Public Debt Charges

Issue

Public debt charges are rising along with interest rates.

Key points

Background

Public debt charge forecasts have been revised upwards since Budget 2023, owing primarily to higher short- and long-term interest rates as forecasted by private sector economists and higher borrowing requirements.  

Table 17
Public debt charge forecasts
  2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029
Budget 2023 34.5 43.9 46.0 46.6 48.3 50.3  
FES 2023 35.0 46.5 52.4 53.3 55.1 58.4 60.7
Budget 2024 35.0 47.2 54.1 54.9 57.0 60.9 64.3
Difference              
From FES 2023 0.0 0.7 1.7 1.6 1.9 2.5 3.6
From Budget 2023 0.5 3.3 8.1 8.3 8.7 10.6  
Table 18
Interest Rate forecasts
Per cent
  2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2023-2027
3-month treasury bill rate
Budget 2023 4.4 3.3 2.6 2.4 2.4 --- 3.0
2023 Fall Economic Statement 4.8 4.3 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 3.5
Budget 2024 4.8 4.5 3.1 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6
10-year government bond rate
Budget 2023 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 --- 3.0
2023 Fall Economic Statement 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.2
Budget 2024 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.3
Chart 3
Public Debt Charges (1983-84 to 2028-29) (Budget 2024 Forecast)
Chart 3: Public Debt Charges (1983-84 to 2028-29) (Budget 2024 Forecast)
Text version
Years GDP Forecast Historical
1981 368.4 4.1
1982 388.2 4.4
1983 421.3 4.8
1984 462.0 5.4
1985 500.0 5.5
1986 526.6 5.5
1987 574.3 5.4
1988 626.9 5.7
1989 671.6 6.1
1990 695.5 6.5
1991 701.8 6.3
1992 718.4 5.8
1993 747.0 5.4
1994 792.0 5.6
1995 831.6 5.9
1996 859.8 5.5
1997 906.9 4.8
1998 940.5 4.6
1999 1,007.9 4.3
2000 1,106.1 4.0
2001 1,144.5 3.5
2002 1,193.7 3.1
2003 1,254.7 2.9
2004 1,335.7 2.6
2005 1,421.6 2.4
2006 1,496.6 2.3
2007 1,577.7 2.1
2008 1,657.0 1.7
2009 1,571.3 1.7
2010 1,666.0 1.7
2011 1,774.1 1.6
2012 1,827.2 1.4
2013 1,902.2 1.3
2014 1,994.9 1.2
2015 1,990.4 1.1
2016 2,025.5 1.0
2017 2,140.6 1.0
2018 2,235.7 1.0
2019 2,313.6 1.1
2020 2,209.7 0.9
2021 2,509.6 1.0
2022 2,813.3 1.2  
2023 2,868.4 1.6  
2024 2,937.9 1.8  
2025 3,063.3 1.7  
2026 3,202.4 1.7  
2027 3,341.4 1.7  
2028 3,481.2 1.7  
Table 19
Reference Table: Budget 2024 Forecast
Fiscal
Year
PDC
($ billions)
% of GDP % of Revenue
1990-91 45.0 6.5 37.6
1991-92 43.9 6.3 34.8
1992-93 41.3 5.8 33.2
1993-94 40.1 5.4 32.4
1994-95 44.2 5.6 33.8
1995-96 49.4 5.9 35.2
1996-97 47.3 5.5 31.5
1997-98 43.1 4.8 26.8
1998-99 43.3 4.6 26.2
1999-00 43.4 4.3 24.6
2000-01 43.9 4.0 22.6
2001-02 39.7 3.5 21.6
2002-03 37.3 3.1 19.6
2003-04 35.8 2.9 17.8
2004-05 34.1 2.6 15.9
2005-06 33.8 2.4 15.1
2006-07 33.9 2.3 14.2
2007-08 33.3 2.1 13.6
2008-09 28.3 1.7 11.9
2009-10 26.6 1.7 12.0
2010-11 28.6 1.7 12.0
2011-12 29.0 1.6 11.8
2012-13 25.5 1.4 10.0
2013-14 24.7 1.3 9.2
2014-15 24.2 1.2 8.6
2015-16 21.8 1.1 7.5
2016-17 21.2 1.0 7.3
2017-18 21.9 1.0 7.0
2018-19 23.3 1.0 7.0
2019-20 24.4 1.1 7.3
2020-21 20.4 0.9 6.4
2021-22 24.5 1.0 5.9
2022-23 35.0 1.2 7.8
2023-24 47.2 1.6 10.1
2024-25 54.1 1.8 10.9
2025-26 54.9 1.8 10.6
2026-27 57.0 1.8 10.6
2027-28 60.8 1.8 10.9
2028-29 64.3 1.8 11.0

Source: Fiscal Reference Tables, Department of Finance Canada Calculations

 

Page details

Date modified: