50-01 Annex B - Application Scoring Guide Template
Cadets and Junior Canadian Rangers Group Instruction (CJCR Gp Inst)
Application Review Phase – Scoring Guide
Candidate Name:
Board Member:
Board Member Signature:
Overall Candidate Score
Phase | Description | Point Allocation | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Application Review Phase | Required experience and quals | /XX |
Secondary requirements | /XX | ||
Total | /XX |
Score Variance
1. The score variance between the highest and lowest scoring Board Member is limited to a variance of no more than 20%. Where the variance of scores exceeds these parameters, Board Members must reconcile the scores by reviewing the scoring criteria together and discuss the rationale for the individual scores they awarded. During the discussion, scores are to be adjusted upward or downward as appropriate to reflect the observations of fellow Board Members. Of note, scores do not need to be identical, merely within the allowed 20% variance.
Minimum Scores
2. Applicants must achieve at least 70% for required experience and qualifications and during the interview phase in order to proceed to the recommendation phase. This is not an accumulative average of 70%. Applicants must obtain 70% in experience and qualifications and the interview phase, unless the selection board provides substantiation to move an applicant to the next phase.
Application Review Phase – Position Title
Candidate Name: | Board Member: |
Outstanding 5 4 The applicant clearly has the required experience and potential for the key requirement. |
Satisfactory 3 2 The applicant has some of the required experience and potential for the key requirement. |
Unsatisfactory 1 0 The applicant does not have enough of the required experience and potential for the requirement. |
Required Experience and Qualifications | Score Based On | Points | WT | Total | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Each item as listed in para 2G of REO with corresponding para number; (2G1) |
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
X 2 | /10 | Examples of weight are included in blue in the WT and Total columns. |
; (2G2) | 5 4 3 2 1 0 |
X | /XX | ||
; and (2G3) | 5 4 3 2 1 0 |
X | /XX | ||
(2G4) etc. | 5 4 3 2 1 0 |
X | /XX | ||
Required Experience and Qualifications Total | /XX |
Outstanding 5 4 The applicant clearly has the required experience and potential for the key requirement. |
Satisfactory 3 2 The applicant has some of the required experience and potential for the key requirement. |
Unsatisfactory 1 0 The applicant does not have enough of the required experience and potential for the requirement. |
Secondary Requirements | Score Based On | Points | WT | Total | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Each item as listed in para 3 of REO with corresponding para number; (3A) |
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
X 2 | /10 | Examples of weight are included in blue in the WT and Total columns. |
; (3B) | 5 4 3 2 1 0 |
X | /XX | ||
; (3C) | 5 4 3 2 1 0 |
X | /XX | ||
Subtotal (A) | /XX |
Past Performance and Potential | ||
Outstanding 25-19 The applicant clearly has the required experience and potential for the key requirement. |
Satisfactory 18-9 The applicant has some of the required experience and potential for the key requirement. |
Unsatisfactory 8-0 The applicant does not have enough of the required experience and potential for the requirement. |
Score Based On | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Review of past performance |
|
/25 | |
Overall potential ranking |
|
/25 | |
Subtotal (B) | /50 | ||
Secondary Requirements, and Past Performance and Potential Total (A + B) | /XX |
Page details
- Date modified: