Archived: Air Pollutant Emission Inventory report: annex 2
Annex 2: Inventory development
A2.1 Overview of the compilation process
The process of compiling emission estimates consists of developing estimates for point source and area source emissions and where necessary, reconciling finalized estimates into a central database (Figure A2-1).
First, point source emissions are compiled with the extraction of National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) facility and emissions data from the verified NPRI database. New facilities are identified in the extracted data and classified among the Air Pollutant Emission Inventory (APEI) sector and subsector categories according to the nature of their activities. A quality control process is performed on the point source data prior to its inclusion in the APEI. A summary of this quality control process is presented in Chapter 4. A list of the final point source emissions data is then produced and transferred to a central database.

Long description for Figure A2-1
Figure A2-1: This flowchart provides an overview of Canada’s annual Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory (APEI) compilation process. Point source emissions are compiled with extraction of the annual National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) facility and emissions data. New facilities are identified in the extracted data, and classified among the APEI sector and subsector categories according to the nature of their activities. Next, imputation of unreported particulate matter (PM)-size fractions is performed and a list of the final point source emissions data is produced and transferred to a central database.
While the point source data are compiled, the area source emissions are estimated. Area source estimation first involves collection and analysis of the latest emission factors and activity data and/or database-drive-emissions models, followed by calculation of the emission estimates.
The next step in the process is elimination of double-counting of emissions between the area source and point source estimates by a process of reconciliation. Once the calculated area source estimates have been transferred to the central database, the estimates are reconciled with the point source emissions by using an automated database utility. Reconciliation of the area source solvent use and Hg emissions with the point source emissions is carried out separately and then transferred to the central database.
The final steps in the compilation process involve aggregation of the final point source and reconciled area source emissions data in the central database to produce draft emissions summaries for quality assurance/quality control and consultation purposes. Any identified issues are addressed and the central database is updated. Final emissions summaries are then produced, and the final emissions database is used to fulfill Canada’s international and domestic reporting obligations
Area source estimation involves an internal review of the estimation methodologies. Such reviews may include literature searches, the collection and analysis of recent emission factors and activity data, and comparisons with relevant information. Planned improvements to methods or data are implemented, and estimates may be recalculated for part of or the entire time series, as appropriate. Updated area source emission estimates are calculated using new and/or updated activity data. Calculations are typically performed in spreadsheets or database-driven emission models.
The next step in the compilation process is the elimination of any double-counting of emissions between the area source and point source estimates by a process of reconciliation. Reconciliation of the area source emissions with the point source emissions is required for sectors or subsectors when both area source and point source emissions exist (Table A2-1). For example, for 2015, reconciliation was performed for the asphalt paving industry since this subsector had both area source and point source emissions. More information on reconciliation is available in section A2.5.1.
This reconciliation process is performed by an automated database utility following transfer of the area source and point source emissions to the central database. Reconciliation of emissions from wood products, emissions from paints and solvents, and mercury emissions from various sectors is carried out separately.
The final steps in the compilation process involve aggregation all reconciled data in the central database to produce draft emissions summaries for quality assurance/control and consultation purposes. The final emissions database is also used to fulfill Canada’s international and domestic reporting obligations.
A2.2 Estimation of the area source emissions
The compilation of area source emissions relies on information such as production data or activity levels for each sector. Calculations of area source emissions are based on the latest data available at the time of compilation. If required, the data are updated the following year.
Table A2-1 lists the area source sectors and subsectors of the APEI and provides the activity data year on which the 2015 area source estimate is based.
The area source estimation methodologies and emission models used in Canada are generally based on those developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and are adapted to utilize Canadian data, thereby accounting for differences in climate, fuels, technologies and practices. Methods used in Canada’s APEI are therefore generally consistent with those used in the United States or those recommended in the emission inventory guidebook (EMEP/EEA 2013).
Tables A2-2 through A2-12 summarize, for each source category, the methodologies used to estimate the area source emissions for the entire time series. For each source category, these tables provide a short description of the following:
- the emission sources and pollutants estimated;
- the general inventory approach used; and
- the references for the activity data, emission factors and/or emissions model used.
Source | Sector | Subsector | Point Source (NPRI)Table A2-1 Note a | Area Source (Estimated by ECCC) | Activity Data Used for Estimation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ore and Mineral Industries | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Aluminium Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Aluminium Industry | Alumina (Bauxite Refining) | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Aluminium Industry | Primary Aluminium Smelting and Refining | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Asphalt Paving Industry | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2014 |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Cement and Concrete Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Cement and Concrete Industry | Cement Manufacture | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Cement and Concrete Industry | Concrete Batching and Products | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Cement and Concrete Industry | Gypsum Product Manufacturing | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Cement and Concrete Industry | Lime Manufacture | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Foundries | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Foundries | Die Casting | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Foundries | Ferrous Foundries | ✓ | ✓ | 2011 |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Foundries | Non-ferrous Foundries | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Iron and Steel Industries | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Iron and Steel Industries | Primary (Blast Furnace and DRI) | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Iron and Steel Industries | Secondary (Electric Arc Furnaces) | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Iron and Steel Industries | Steel Recycling | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Iron Ore Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Iron Ore Industry | Iron Ore Mining | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Iron Ore Industry | Pelletizing | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mineral Products Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mineral Products Industry | Clay Products | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mineral Products Industry | Other Mineral Products | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mining and Rock Quarrying | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mining and Rock Quarrying | Coal Mining Industry | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mining and Rock Quarrying | Metal Mining | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mining and Rock Quarrying | Potash | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mining and Rock Quarrying | Rock, Sand and Gravel | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mining and Rock Quarrying | Silica Production | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Mining and Rock Quarrying | Other Minerals | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Non-Ferrous Mining and Smelting Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Non-Ferrous Mining and Smelting Industry | Primary Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Non-Ferrous Mining and Smelting Industry | Secondary Pb, Cu | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Ore and Mineral Industries | Non-Ferrous Mining and Smelting Industry | Other Metals | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Downstream Petroleum Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Downstream Petroleum Industry | Petroleum Refining | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Downstream Petroleum Industry | Refined Petroleum Products Bulk Storage and Distribution | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Downstream Petroleum Industry | Other Downstream Petroleum Industry | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution | Natural Gas Distribution | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution | Natural Gas Transmission | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution | Petroleum Product Pipelines | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Accidents and Equipment Failures | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Bitumen and Heavy Oil Upgrading | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Disposal and Waste Treatment | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Heavy Crude Oil Cold Production | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Light Medium Crude Oil ProductionTable A2-1 Note b | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Natural Gas Production and ProcessingTable A2-1 Note c | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Oil Sands In-Situ Extraction and Processing | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Oil Sands Mining Extraction and Processing | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Petroleum Liquids Storage | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Petroleum Liquids Transportation | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Oil and Gas Industry | Upstream Petroleum Industry | Well Drilling/Servicing/Testing | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Electric Power Generation (Utilities) | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Electric Power Generation (Utilities) | Coal | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Electric Power Generation (Utilities) | Diesel | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Electric Power Generation (Utilities) | Natural Gas | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Electric Power Generation (Utilities) | Waste Materials | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Electric Power Generation (Utilities) | Other Electric Power Generation | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Abrasives Manufacture | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Bakeries | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Manufacturing | Biofuel Production | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Chemicals Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Chemicals Industry | Chemical Manufacture | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Chemicals Industry | Fertilizer Production | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Chemicals Industry | Paint and Varnish Manufacturing | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Chemicals Industry | Petrochemical Industry | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Chemicals Industry | Plastics and Synthetic Resins Fabrication | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Chemicals Industry | Other Chemical Industries | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Electronics | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Manufacturing | Food Preparation | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Glass Manufacture | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Grain Processing | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Manufacturing | Metal Fabrication | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Plastics Manufacture | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Pulp and Paper Industry | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Textiles | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Vehicle Manufacture (Engines, Parts, Assembly, Painting) | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Wood ProductsTable A2-1 Note d | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Wood Products | Panel Board Mills | ✓ | ✓ | 2014 |
Manufacturing | Wood Products | Sawmills | ✓ | ✓ | 2014 |
Manufacturing | Wood Products | Other Wood Products | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Manufacturing | Other Manufacturing Industries | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2008 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Air Transportation | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Heavy-duty diesel vehicles | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Heavy-duty gasoline vehicles | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Heavy-duty LPG/NG vehicles | Empty | Empty | ✓ | Empty |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Light-duty diesel trucks | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Light-duty diesel vehicles | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Light-duty gasoline trucks | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Light-duty gasoline vehicles | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Light-duty LPG/NG trucks | Empty | Empty | ✓ | Empty |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Light-duty LPG/NG vehicles | Empty | Empty | ✓ | Empty |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Marine Transportation | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Motorcycles | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Off-road diesel vehicles and equipment | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Off-road gasoline/LPG/CNG vehicles and equipment | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Rail Transportation | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Transportation and Mobile Equipment | Tire Wear and Brake Lining | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Agriculture | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Agriculture | Animal Production | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Agriculture | Crop Production | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Agriculture | Crop Production | Fertilizer Application | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Agriculture | Crop Production | Harvesting | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Agriculture | Crop Production | Tillage Practices | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Agriculture | Crop Production | Wind Erosion | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Agriculture | Fuel Use | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2014 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Cigarette Smoking | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2013 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Commercial and Institutional Fuel Combustion | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Commercial Cooking | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Construction Fuel Combustion | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Home Firewood Burning | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Human | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Marine Cargo Handling | Empty | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Residential Fuel Combustion | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Service Stations | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Other Miscellaneous Sources | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Incineration and Waste | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Incineration and Waste | Crematoriums | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Incineration and Waste | Industrial and Commercial Incineration | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2011 |
Incineration and Waste | Municipal Incineration | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2011 |
Incineration and Waste | Waste | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Incineration and Waste | Waste | Landfills | ✓ | ✓ | 2014 |
Incineration and Waste | Waste | Residential Waste Burning | Empty | ✓ | 2014 |
Incineration and Waste | Waste | Waste Treatment and Disposal | ✓ | Empty | Empty |
Incineration and Waste | Waste | Water and Sewage Treatment | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Incineration and Waste | Other Incineration and Utilities | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2009 |
Paints and Solvents | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Paints and Solvents | Dry Cleaning | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Paints and Solvents | General Solvent Use | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Paints and Solvents | Printing | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Paints and Solvents | Surface Coatings | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2015 |
Dust | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Dust | Coal Transportation | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Dust | Construction Operations | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2012 |
Dust | Mine Tailings | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2006 |
Dust | Paved Roads | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2002 |
Dust | Unpaved Roads | Empty | ✓ | ✓ | 2002 |
Fires | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Fires | Prescribed Forest Burning | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Fires | Structural Fires | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2015 |
Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Empty | Mercury in ProductsTable A2-1 Note e | Empty | Empty | ✓ | 2008 |
Notes:
✓ denotes yes
- Table A2-1 Note a All point source data were obtained from the 2015 NPRI.
- Table A2-1 Note b Point source data consists of facilities located in Atlantic Canada. For other provinces, it consists of area source data.
- Table A2-1 Note c Point source data consists of facilities located in Atlantic Canada and SO2 emissions from Alberta's natural gas processing facilities.
- Table A2-1 Note d Area source PM emissions for Wood Products were estimated by the Forestry Products group of the Environmental Stewardship Branch at ECCC. All other area source pollutants were estimated by PIRD.
- Table A2-1 Note e Emissions from Hg-containing products were calculated as a separate inventory. Emissions are reported under many sectors, such as Iron and Steel Industries, Municipal Incineration, Human and Landfills. All area source Hg in product emissions continues to be estimated and reported under these sectors.
Table A2-2: Estimation methodologies for ore and mineral industries (sector/subsector)
Asphalt Paving Industry
- Description
-
Asphalt Paving Industry consists of emissions released during asphalt concrete (or hot-mix asphalt) manufacturing. Asphalt concrete manufacturing includes the heating and mixing of asphaltic cement with a mixture of graded aggregates. The sector applies to both permanent or portable hot-mix asphalt installations.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Total usage of asphalt by province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Cutback and emulsion asphalt data to calculate VOC emissions from paving process: SNC/GECO Canada (1981)
Asphalt usage data from construction sector: Statistics Canada (2015c)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p: Senes Consultants (2008)
VOCs from paving: SNC/GECO Canada (1981)
Concrete Batching & Products (under Cement and Concrete Industry)
- Description
-
Concrete Batching and Products include emissions produced by activities at concrete batching plants.
Concrete is composed essentially of water, cement, fine aggregate (i.e. sand) and coarse aggregate (i.e. gravel, crushed stone or iron blast furnace slag). Concrete batching plants store, convey, measure and discharge these constituents into trucks for transport to a construction site or process, for use in the manufacturing of concrete pipe, concrete blocks, etc.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, Pb, Cd
Total usage of cement by province/territory (using national data with a provincial/territory population distribution), is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Cement consumption distribution for the provinces: CANMET (1993)
Cement production data: NRCan (2015)
Population data for the provinces: Statistics Canada (2015b)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, Pb, Cd: U.S. EPA (1998, 2010a)
Emission factors for TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 emitted by loading mixers and loading trucks: (U.S. EPA 2006)
PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors for sand and aggregate transfer are derived from a weighted combination of TPM emission factors, using information from the U.S. EPA’s PM Calculator database (2010a) (using SCC 30501101):
EFPM10=0.51*EFMTPM
EFPM2.5=0.15*EFTPM
Ferrous Foundries (under Foundries)
- Description
-
Ferrous Foundries include facilities that produce castings of various types of ferro-alloys, as well as small iron and steel foundries not associated with integrated iron and steel facilities. The types of foundries found in Canada include open ferrous, electric arc and induction foundries.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2011 and have been carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Methodology under review.
Rock, Sand and Gravel (under Mining and Rock Quarrying)
- Description
-
Rock, Sand and Gravel encompasses emissions from rock quarrying, stone processing, and sand and gravel operations.
Rock quarrying activities typically include the following sources: overburden removal, drilling in rock, blasting, loading of materials, transporting raw materials by conveyors or haulage trucks, scraping, bulldozing, grading, open storage pile losses, and wind erosion from exposed areas.
Stone processing is categorized into three activities, depending on the size of stone required: crushed stone, pulverized stone and building stone.
Sand and gravel deposits are quarried, transported to the plant, and then classified and stockpiled. Processing is accomplished by crushing, screening, washing, blending and stockpiling materials according to product specifications. Products are used for road construction, as an aggregate for asphalt and concrete, and for other construction purposes such as fill and mortar sand. Sand is also used in the glassmaking, foundry and abrasives industries.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Total quantity of rock, sand and gravel produced by province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
F. Menezes, Natural Resources CanadaFootnote7
Confidential provincial production values are estimated with population distributions: Statistics Canada (2016b)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5: EMEP/EEA (2013)
Silica Production (under Mining and Rock Quarrying)
- Description
-
Silica Production applies to silica sand quarrying and processing mainly for the glass and refining and smelting industries. Industrial sand processing operations are similar to those of construction sand production, with dust emissions originating mainly from crushing and screening operations, especially when grinding to very fine particle sizes. Dry or wet screening and air classification may be carried out to achieve the desired size distribution. Both wet and dry methods of dust control are used, and baghouses are commonly used.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Total quantity of silica produced by province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
F. Menezes, Natural Resources CanadaFootnote8
Confidential provincial production values are estimated with population distributions: Statistics Canada (2016b)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5: EMEP/EEA (2013)
Table A2-3: Estimation methodologies for oil and gas industry (sector/subsector)
Refined Petroleum Products Bulk Storage and Distribution (under Downstream Petroleum Industry)
- Description
-
Refined Petroleum Products Bulk Storage and Distribution covers fugitive VOC emissions from bulk distribution terminals and bulk plants. It includes volatile components of fuels that are emitted as fuel moves from the refinery to the end user whenever tanks are filled or emptied or while tanks are open to the atmosphere, be they large above-ground tanks, tank trucks, or railcars. In addition, the subsector includes emissions that occur from the evaporation of fuels spilled during transfer operations.
Only fugitive VOC emissions from bulk plants are estimated as an area source.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
VOCs
Emissions are calculated using the gross sales of gasoline for on-road motor vehicles multiplied by emission factors developed by Tecsult (2006).
- Activity Data
-
Gross sales of gasoline for motor vehicles: Statistics Canada (2015a)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Study on gasoline vapour recovery in Stage 1 distribution networks in Canada: Tecsult (2006)
Natural Gas Distribution (under Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution)
- Description
-
Natural Gas Distribution includes emissions from all infrastructure used to distribute natural gas to market.
Emissions from related construction activities, ancillary structures and operations (buildings, offices, etc.), and mobile sources are included under the Construction Operations, Commercial Fuel Combustion and Mobile Sources (respectively) of the APEI.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3
Emission estimates are generated with a comprehensive inventory and extrapolated based on production data (Environment Canada 2014, CAPP 2005)
- Activity Data
-
Environment Canada 2014b, AER 2016, BCOGC 2016, CAPP 2016, CNLOPB 2016a, CNLOPB 2016b, CNLOPB 2016c, CNLOPB 2016d, CNLOPB 2016e, SK MOE 2016a, SK MOE 2016b, Statistics Canada 2016e, Statistics Canada 2016f
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Environment Canada 2014
Natural Gas Transmission (under Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution)
- Description
-
Natural Gas Transmission includes emissions from all infrastructure used to transport natural gas.
Emissions from related construction activities, ancillary structures and operations (buildings, offices, etc.) and mobile sources are included under the Construction Operations, Commercial Fuel Combustion and Mobile Sources (respectively) of the APEI.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3
Emission estimates are generated with a comprehensive inventory for 2011 and extrapolated based on production data (Environment Canada 2014, CAPP 2005).
- Activity Data
-
Environment Canada 2014, AER 2016, BCOGC 2016, CAPP 2016, CNLOPB 2016a, CNLOPB 2016b, CNLOPB 2016c, CNLOPB 2016d, CNLOPB 2016e, SK MOE 2016a, SK MOE 2016b, Statistics Canada 2016e, Statistics Canada 2016f
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Environment Canada 2014
Upstream Petroleum Industry
- Description
-
The Upstream Petroleum Industry includes emissions from all infrastructure used to locate, extract, produce, process/treat and transport liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), condensate, crude oil, heavy oil and in situ crude bitumen to market. It also includes emissions from onshore and offshore facilities, as well as drilling and exploration, conventional oil and gas production, open pit mining and in situ oil sands production, natural gas processing and oil transmission. Specifically, this includes the following subsectors:
- Accidents and Equipment Failures
- Disposal and Waste Treatment
- Heavy Crude Oil Cold Production
- Light Medium Crude Oil Production
- Natural Gas Production and Processing
- Oil Sands In-Situ Extraction and Processing
- Petroleum Liquids Transportation
- Well Drilling/Servicing/Testing
Emissions from related construction activities, ancillary structures and operations (buildings, offices, etc.), and mobile sources are included under the Construction Operations, Commercial and Institutional Fuel Combustion, and Transportation and Mobile Sources (respectively) of the APEI.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3
Emission estimates are generated with a comprehensive inventory for 2011 and are extrapolated based on production data (Environment Canada 2014, CAPP 2005).
- Activity Data
-
Environment Canada 2014, AER 2016, BCOGC 2016, CAPP 2016, CNLOPB 2016a, CNLOPB 2016b, CNLOPB 2016c, CNLOPB 2016d, CNLOPB 2016e, SK MOE 2016a, SK MOE 2016b, Statistics Canada 2016f
In addition to the extrapolated estimates, the SOx estimates for Alberta are adjusted to account for regulations that were developed after the model was originally created. The adjustments are made with both historical provincial data and NPRI data. NPRI data for the Atlantic provinces are used in place of the model estimates due to the complete facility coverage for the region. Additionally, extrapolated estimates for the Oil Sands In-Situ Extraction and Processing facilities are reconciled with NPRI data to eliminate double-counting.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Environment Canada 2014
Table A2-4 Estimation methodologies for manufacturing (sector/subsector)
Bakeries (under Other Industries Sector)
- Description
-
Bakeries release VOCs during the leavening process of industrial baking. Emissions from products leavened by baking powder (used mainly for pastries) are negligible; however, VOCs are released when yeast is used for leavening. Yeast is used nearly exclusively in the production of bread and bread-like pastries.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
VOCs
Total quantity of bread produced by province/territory is multiplied by an emission factor for VOCs.
- Activity Data
-
Bread production values are estimated using:
- National bread/bakery product shipment values: Statistics Canada (2016a)
- Provincial bread/bakery product shipment values: Statistics Canada (2016c)
- Monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) for Bread/Rolls and Flatbreads: Statistics Canada (2016c)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Cheminfo (2005)
EFVOC = 2.35 kg per tonne of baked goods
Grain Processing
- Description
-
Grain Processing covers emissions from grain elevators. Grain elevators are divided into four groups in the APEI:
Primary elevators receive grain by truck from producers for either storage or forwarding. These elevators sometimes clean or dry grain before it is transported to terminal or process elevators (U.S. EPA 1985).
Process elevators are grain processing plants or mills. While the elevator operations of unloading, conveying and storing are performed at these locations, direct manufacturing or processing of grain for use in other products are also carried out (U.S. EPA 1985).
Terminal elevators dry, clean, blend and store grain for shipment to transfer elevators, other terminals (for export) or process elevators.
Transfer elevators generally perform the same function as terminal elevators.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Total grain production by province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors through primary elevators, process elevators, transfer elevators and terminal elevators.
- Activity Data
-
Annual grain production data by regions: CGC (2015)
Distribution of elevator throughputs: EC (1983)
Grain data: annual field crop production data by province (Statistics Canada 2015b, CANSIM, Table 001-0010).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5: Pinchin Environmental Ltd (2007)
Sawmills, Panel Board Mills and Other Wood Products (under Wood Products)
- Description
-
Sawmills cover emissions from facilities that typically produce hardwood and softwood lumber from logs. The process of converting wet logs into dry lumber includes debarking, sawing, drying and planing steps, which all release air emissions.
Panel Board Mills include emissions from several types of mills, all producing hardwood and softwood-based materials. These include:
- Veneer and plywood mills
- Waferboard mills, consisting primarily of oriented strand board (OSB) mills
- Particle board and medium-density fiberboard (MDF) mills
Other Wood Products encompass emissions from furniture and cabinet manufacturers, wood treating plants, wood pellet mills and Masonite manufacturers.
The combustion of various fuels for energy production or waste disposal, notably wood residues, natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and fuel oil, is a common practice at wood products facilities. Significant amounts of air pollutant emissions result from combustion in this sector.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Sawmills and Panel Board Mills:
- TPM, PM10 and PM2.5: Estimation methodology makes use of the NPRI point source data in addition to a number of production indicators to estimate the PM of the facilities not reporting to the NPRI (Natural Resources Canada, Forest Products Association of Canada and the Composite Panel Association, corporate website information, annual reports, Resource Information Systems Inc. publications, Madison publications and occasional discussion with industry representatives);
- All other pollutants: Production rate estimates, hog fuel combustion data, and other fuel use data are used to estimate the area source emissions of the remaining pollutants (Meil et al. 2009; U.S. EPA 2014a).
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2014 and have been carried forward to 2015.
Other Wood Products:
All pollutants: Area source emissions are not calculated for this subsector. Rather, emissions are represented by point source data reported to the NPRI by the facilities themselves.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2014 and have been carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
NPRI 2014 data (EC 2015a) and data sources for facilities not reporting to the NPRI, including:
- Natural Resources Canada: Status of Energy Use in the Canadian Wood Products Sector (Meil et al. 2009)
- Forest Products Association of Canada annual reports (proprietary reports)
- Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Forestry Products Group
- RISI North American Wood Panels and Engineered Wood Products Capacity Report (RISI 2013)
- Madison’s 2014 Online Lumber Directory (Madison 2014)
- Verbal communications with industry representatives (unpublished)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Sawmills: U.S. EPA (2012a)
Plywood manufacturing, particle board, oriented strand board: U.S. EPA (1995b)
Fuel combustion: Meil et al. (2009); U.S. EPA (1992, 1995b, 2014a)
Table A2-5: Estimation methodologies for transportation and mobile equipment (sector/subsector)
Air Transportation
- Description
-
Air Transportation covers emissions from aircraft, but not airport support equipment (captured as off-road applications).
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Aircraft-specific activity (landing/take-offs) by province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
The emission estimates from Air Transportation are calculated using Aircraft Movement Statistics (Statistics Canada 2015d), a database developed by Statistics Canada based on flight-by-flight data, recorded at airport towers operated by NAV Canada post-1996 and Transport Canada pre-1996. The data are of the highest resolution available and are the only known such aircraft movement data within Canada.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
For aircraft using turbo aviation fuel, hydrocarbon (HC), CO and NOx emission factors are taken from the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) databank (2009) or Hagstrom (2010) databank for landing/take-offs (LTO), and from EMEP/CORINAIR (2006) for the cruise stage. Emission factors are mapped to representative aircraft, based on engine characteristics. SO2 is estimated as a sulphur balance, using data from the Sulphur In Liquid Fuels reports (EC 2013). The NH3 emission factor is taken from Coe et al. (1996). Emissions of PM during LTO are based on a paper by Wayson et al. (2009), which relates the smoke number from the ICAO databank to an emission factor in g/kg fuel consumed.
For aircraft using aviation gasoline, VOC, CO, PM10 and NOx emission factors are taken from the Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA 2007). No quantification of these emissions is performed at the cruise stage, due to a lack of emission factors. SO2 is estimated as a sulphur balance, using data from the Sulphur In Liquid Fuels reports (EC 2013). The NH3 emission factor is taken from Coe et al. (1996). PM2.5 is calculated as 69% of PM10 as per U.S. EPA (2005a). Lead is estimated as a lead balance, using the U.S. EPA’s 5% retention (U.S. EPA 2013). TPM is equal to PM10 (U.S. EPA 2005a). Emissions of non-standard CACs are estimated as a ratio to PM10 or HC/VOCs based on speciation profiles from the U.S. EPA (U.S. EPA 2005a).
Marine Transportation
- Description
-
Marine Transportation covers emissions from commercial marine vessels, but not recreational marine engines (captured as off-road applications).
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Vessel-specific activity (movements) is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Vessel-specific movements: SNC-Lavalin Environment (2012)
SNC-Lavalin Environment (2012)
Due to the unavailability of activity data, emission estimates are calculated using linear interpolations for the years 2011 through 2014.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Emission factors originate from a variety of sources and are distinct per vessel type and dead weight tonnage, engine size and type, fuel type, and movement component (underway, anchor or berth). For this iteration of the APEI, the Marine Emission Inventory Tool (MEITv4.1) was used.
Emission factor sources, application and summaries are provided in section 3.3 of SNC-Lavalin Environment (2012). MEIT natively outputs hydrocarbon (HC), but not VOCs. An HC-to-VOC conversion rate is taken from U.S. EPA (2010c). Emissions of non-standard CACs are estimated as a ratio to PM10 or HC/VOC, based on speciation profiles from the U.S. EPA (2005a).
On-road Vehicles
- Description
-
On-road Vehicles include: Heavy-duty diesel vehicles, Heavy-duty gasoline trucks, Light-duty diesel trucks, Light-duty diesel vehicles, Light-duty gasoline trucks, Light-duty gasoline vehicles, Propane and natural gas vehicles, Motorcycles, and Tire Wear & Brake Lining.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Vehicle-specific activity (vehicle kilometres travelled) is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors in the MOVES model (version MOVES2014 was used for this submission).
Refuelling VOC emissions are included in under Service Stations.
- Activity Data
-
Data on the vehicle fleet (counts), defined by fuel type, model-year and gross vehicle weight rating, originate from DesRosiers Automotive Consultants (DAC 2014) and R. L. Polk & Co. (Polk & Co. 2013) for light- and heavy-duty vehicles, respectively. Motorcycle populations originate from the publication Road Motor Vehicle, Trailer and Snowmobile Registration (registrations) (Statistics Canada 2013). The Annual Industry Statistics report (MMIC 2013) is used to estimate the age distribution of motorcycles by model year which is applied to motorcycle populations obtained from Statistics Canada.The actual activity level is vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT). To arrive at estimates of VKT, vehicle counts are multiplied by mileage accumulation rates from Stewart-Brown Associates (Stewart-Brown 2012).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Emission factors for on-road vehicles are embedded in the MOVES model. More information on MOVES is available online in the U.S. EPA user guides (U.S. EPA 2012b, 2014b) and in U.S. EPA technical guidance document (U.S. EPA 2010b).
Off-road Vehicles and Equipment
- Description
-
Off-road Vehicles and Equipment consists of Off-road diesel vehicles and equipment and Off-road gasoline/LPG/CNG vehicles and equipment
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Application-specific activity (hours-of-use, load factor) is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors in the NONROAD model.
- Activity Data
-
Data on the applications (vehicle/engine counts, load factor, hours-of-use), defined by fuel type, model year and source classification code, originate from EC (2011).
Off-road gasoline usage data: (ECCC 2016)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Emission factors for off-road applications are embedded in the NONROAD model. For this iteration of the APEI, NONROAD version 2012C was used. This version is based on the U.S. EPA’s NONROAD2008, and modified by Environment and Climate Change Canada to exploit detailed activity data. Model operation is conducted following the user guide for NONROAD2005/2008 (U.S. EPA 2005b), given that the functionality of the models is the same.
Emissions of non-standard CACs are estimated as a ratio to PM10 or HC/VOC, based on speciation profiles in the SPECIATE4.2 database (U.S. EPA 2008). More information on the NONROAD model is available online.
Rail Transportation
- Description
-
Rail Transportation covers emissions from the fuel consumed by locomotive engines.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Railway activity (fuel consumption) is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Fuel consumption data: Statistics Canada (2015c)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
In 2013, the Rail Association of Canada (RAC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on locomotive emissions with Transport Canada for the period 2011-2015. Under the terms of the MOU, the RAC provides multiple datasets on the industry, including emission factors.
HC, CO, SO2, PM10 and NOx emission factors are taken from RAC (2013). HC emissions are converted to VOCs using the method in U.S. EPA (2011). Ratios of PM10 to PM2.5 and TPM are taken from the U.S. EPA (U.S. EPA 2005a). The emission factor for NH3 is taken from Coe et al. (1996). With the exception of dioxins/furans, emissions of non-standard CACs are estimated as a ratio to PM10 or HC/VOCs, based on speciation profiles from U.S. EPA (2011). The dioxin/furan emission factor (0.54 ng/L) is taken from U.S. EPA (2006).
Table A2-6: Estimation methodologies for agriculture (sector/subsector)
Animal Production
- Description
-
Animal Production reports emissions from the volatilization of NH3 from nitrogen in manure, particulate matter that is released from feeding and housing, and non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) that are released during livestock feeding, housing and manure management.
Ammonia volatilization is a chemical process that occurs when manure is excreted or stored without a cover. Once excreted, manure moves through a number of stages until it is eventually cycled back to farm fields. Ammonia volatilization occurs at each stage of this cycle, including: animal housing, transport to long-term storage, storage, and application of manure to the field.
Livestock production results in primary PM emissions as a result of the aerial transport of feed particles, feather fragments, fecal material, skin debris or dander, animal wastes, mould spores, bacteria, fungus, litter fragments, etc. Ventilation systems in livestock buildings are required for air exchange and, as a result, a portion of the PM in confined livestock buildings will be emitted into the atmosphere via the ventilation system.
NMVOC emissions from livestock production are the result of biological processes that partially break down feed during storage and digestion. Emissions from excreted manure occur during all stages of the manure management cycle. Sites of emission therefore include silage stores, livestock housing, manure stores, and agricultural fields on which manure is applied or that are used for grazing.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, NH3, NMVOCs
The methodologies for ammonia emissions are developed by Environment and Climate Change Canada in collaboration with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) through a national research project: the National Agri-Environmental Standards Initiative (NAESI).
Methods describing the estimates of NH3 emissions from Canadian livestock are published for all major livestock categories (dairy, non-dairy, swine and poultry). Details on parameters used and animal category-specific methodologies are available from the following publications: Sheppard and Bittman (2010, 2012); and Sheppard et al. (2007a, 2007b, 2009a, 2009b, 2010a, 2011a; 2011b). Methodologies for minor animals, such as horses, goats, fur-bearing animals (mink, fox), wild boars, deer, elk, rabbit and poultry, were taken from Battye et al. (1994).
The methodologies for emissions of particulate matter from livestock production are developed by AAFC for publication in the National Agri-Environmental Health Analysis and Reporting Program (NAHARP), published every five years with the Agricultural Census. The method is consistent with the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP)/Core Inventory of Air Emissions in Europe (CORINAIR) Guidebook (EMEP/CORINAIR 2002), but uses country-specific emission factors. Methodologies are published in Pattey and Qiu (2012) and Pattey et al. (2015).
The methodology for estimating NMVOC emissions of was based on tier 1 methodology outlined in the 2013 European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme/European Environment Agency Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook (EMEP/EEA, 2013).
- Activity Data
-
Annual cattle, sheep and swine populations are calculated as the simple mean of semi-annual or quarterly surveys (Statistics Canada 2016f, 2016g). These smaller surveys are corrected to the Census of Agriculture (COA) population estimates that are collected every 5 years to ensure the accuracy of the estimates.
The populations of other livestock, such as horses, goats, bison, llamas and alpacas, deer and elk, wild boars, rabbits, and poultry, are taken from the COA exclusively, and annual populations are developed by linear interpolation in order to avoid large changes in census years. Where populations for certain alternative livestock animal categories were not available in the COA, values were held constant, or extrapolated back to zero.
The breeding mink and fox population estimates were taken from an annual Statistics Canada survey titled Supply and Disposition of Mink and Fox on Fur Farms (Statistics Canada 2016h). Rabbit populations were taken from responses to the COA as provided on the AAFC Red Meat Market website (AAFC 2016).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Ammonia:
Ammonia emission factors are a weighted average of a variety of different emission fractions that occur during the stages of the manure and animal production cycle.
The input to the emission factor equation originates from a combination of the Livestock Farm Practices Survey (LFPS), which defines feed distribution to and consumption by animals throughout the year, and generic parameters derived from scientific literature or expert opinion. This information is distributed spatially across Canada by ecoregion.
Animal populations are reassigned to a matrix of animal housing and manure management systems based on their relative proportion in the overall farm population.
The fractions of NH3 emitted at each step in the manure cycle are taken in part from the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP)/Core Inventory of Air Emissions in Europe (CORINAIR) Guidebook (EMEP/CORINAIR 2002) and in part from Canadian studies. The resulting weighted emission factors are applied to populations of animal subcategories taken from census data at the ecoregion spatial scale.
Model to calculate NH3 emissions: Sheppard et al. (2010a)
Particulate Matter:
Total particulate matter (TPM) emission factors for poultry are taken from Van Heyst (2005) and Van Heyst and Roumeliotis (2007). Emission factors for cattle and swine are average values from Takai et al. (1998) and Seedorf (2004). In the case of PM10 and PM2.5, emissions are estimated from TPM emission factors multiplied by 0.45 and 0.1 to produce PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors, respectively.
Average animal weights are used to convert emission factors in the form of g d-1 AU-1 to units of kg head-1 year-1
The emission factors for cattle are also assigned to the other animal types by assuming that the emission factors per animal unit for sheep, goats, bison, llamas, alpacas and horses are the same as those for cattle. Average body weight of cattle are consistent with information provided by Boadi et al. (2004) and with weight corrections for cattle according to the methodology outlined in the National Inventory Report: 1990-2013, Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada (EC 2015b). All other animal weights were consistent with values used to estimate nitrogen excretion in EC (2015b).
Currently no emissions are estimated for mink, fox, wild boars, deer, elk or rabbit.
Non-methane volatile organic compounds:
The emission factors for all animals were taken from Table 3-3 of EMEP/EEA (2013). For livestock categories where a choice of emissions factors was provided, the non-silage emission factor was selected, except for dairy cows and beef cattle in feedlots where the silage emission factor was used. A weighted emission factor for beef cattle was calculated using the fraction of time spent during each stage of production according to Boadi et al. (2004).
Fertilizer Application (Under Crop Production)
- Description
-
Fertilizer Application includes emissions emitted when synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are applied for annual and perennial crop production.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, NH3
Ammonia:
The method is a simplified version of the approach adopted by Sheppard et al. (2010b) for application on an annual time step.
The methodology uses a regression model developed by Bouwman et al. (2002) and derived NH3 emission factors, taking into account the most important parameters influencing emissions from synthetic nitrogen fertilizer application, based on a meta-analysis of scientific literature.
Particulates:
Methodology is under review.
- Activity Data
-
Data on the types of nitrogen fertilizer used on farms are published by Statistics Canada (2015e).
Areas of seeded annual and perennial crops:
Statistics Canada (2015d) - CANSIM Table 001-0010 - Estimated areas, yield, production and average farm price of principal field crops, in metric units, annual, 1990 to 2015.
Soil properties, including pH and cation exchange capacity, are included in calculations by using soil polygon information from a national-scale spatial database describing the types of soils associated with landforms.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Ammonia emission factors are calculated using the multiple linear regression equation from Bouwman et al. (2002). The approach uses different regression parameters for synthetic nitrogen fertilizer types, method of nitrogen application, crop type, and soil pH and cation exchange capacity.
A matrix of emission factors for each combination of these conditions occurring across Canada is derived. The average provincial and national emission factors are weighted averages of the relative proportion of each combination of fertilizer type and fertilizer application practice on different soil types in different ecodistricts across the country.
TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 methodology is under review.
Harvesting (under Crop Production)
- Description
-
Agricultural harvest activities entrain particulate matter into the air. Particulate matter generated from agricultural harvesting, also known as grain dust, includes grain and dry plant particles, moulds, pollen and spores, silica, bacteria, fungi, insects and possibly pesticide residues. These emissions are generated by vehicles traveling over the soil or by the processing of plant materials by agricultural equipment.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Particulate matter emissions from agricultural harvest operations are computed by multiplying an emission factor and an activity factor relating emissions to the area harvested.
- Activity Data
-
Activity data for PM emission estimates from crop harvesting rely on a combination of data from the Census of Agriculture and area estimates based on Earth Observation data. Activity data on areas of major field crops at an ecodistrict level from 1990 to 2015 are consistent with the data reported in the Agriculture and the Cropland remaining Cropland category of the Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry sector for the National Inventory Report: 1990-2015, Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada (EC 2015).
- Emission Factors (EF)
- There are no emission factors for agricultural harvest in Canada. The PM 10 emission factors proposed by CARB (2003) are used to calculate PM emissions from crop harvest. Where the specific emission factors for some crops are not available from CARB (2003), the emission factors for these crops are based on an approximation from the closest representation (Pattey and Qiu 2012).
Tillage Practices (under Crop Production)
- Description
-
Tillage practices produce PM emissions from mechanical disturbances such as seeding, seed bed preparation and cultivation.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Agricultural tillage is the common method used by farmers to prepare land for seeding and weed control. Particulate matter emissions are generated from airborne soil particles during tillage operations due to the mechanical disturbance of the soil surface.
Particulate matter emissions from agricultural tillage operations are proportional to the area tilled. They are also dependent on the type of tillage practice as well as the number of tillage events per year. The calculations are described in more detail in Pattey and Qiu (2012).
The number of tillage events per year is dependent on tillage practices. There are fewer tillage events per year for conservation tillage compared to conventional tillage. Therefore, a reduction in particulate matter emissions from reduced tillage and no-till is observed.
- Activity Data
-
Activity data for PM emission estimates from tillage practices rely mainly on a combination of data from the Census of Agriculture and area estimates based on Earth Observation analyses. Activity data on areas of major field crops, including summerfallow, and on tillage practices at an ecodistrict level from 1990 to 2015 are consistent with the data reported inthe Cropland remaining Cropland category of the Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry sector for the National Inventory Report: 1990-2015, Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada (EC 2015).
Information on the number of tillage events per year for crop type and tillage practices is taken from soil cover indicators (Huffman et al. 2012).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Emission factors for tillage practices are calculated using the method in U.S. EPA (1985).
Wind Erosion (under Crop Production)
- Description
-
Wind erosion commonly occurs as wind blows across exposed agricultural land and results in PM emissions from the entrained particles.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Wind erosion emissions from agricultural lands are calculated by multiplying the cultivated cropland area by an emission factor.
- Activity Data
-
Activity data for PM emission estimates from wind erosion rely mainly on a combination of data from the Census of Agriculture and area estimates based on Earth Observation data. Activity data on areas of major field crops, including summerfallow, and on tillage practices at an ecodistrict level from 1990 to 2015 are consistent with the data reported in the Cropland remaining Cropland category of the Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry sector for the National Inventory Report: 1990-2015, Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada (EC 2015).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
The PM emission factor for wind erosion is calculated using the wind erosion equation (Woodruff and Siddoway 1965), but considers the impact of soil and crop cover on PM emissions (Huffman et al. 2012). The emission factor for windblown PM emissions from agricultural lands is calculated using the methodology described in Pattey and Qiu (2012).
Fuel Use
- Description
-
Agriculture - Fuel Use estimates includes emissions resulting primarily from external combustion sources used for space/water heating and crop drying.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Emissions are calculated for 10 types of fuel: natural gas, natural gas liquids, kerosene and stove oils, light fuel oil, heavy fuel oil, Canadian bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, lignite coal, anthracite coal and imported coal.
Total usage by fuel type and province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Statistics Canada (2015c)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO: U.S. EPA (1998)
(Emission factors are chosen to represent the typical type of combustion equipment for each fuel type.)TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO for natural gas fuel: U.S. EPA (2004a)
Sulphur contents of liquid fuels: EC (2010)
Sulphur contents of coal: CEA (2002)NH3: Battye et al. (1994); Coe et al. (1996)
Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f: CARB (2005); U.S. EPA (1998, 2003, 2004a)
(Emission factors are selected to represent the typical type of combustion equipment for each fuel type.)
Table A2-7: Estimation methodologies for commercial/ residential/ institutional (sector/subsector)
Cigarette Smoking
- Description
-
Two sources of emissions are included under Cigarette Smoking:
- Mainstream cigarette smoke, which is directly exhaled by the smoker
- Sidestream smoke, which is directly released from burning cigarettes
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f
The average number of cigarettes smoked per year by the smoking population by province/territory is calculated and then multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Health Canada (2015); Statistics Canada (2014c)
Due to the unavailability of activity data, emission estimates for 2014 were carried over for 2015 and estimates for 1998 were calculated using linear interpolation.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5: Ott et al. (1996)
VOCs: Wallace et al. (1987)
CO: Ott et al. (1992)
NH3: Roe et al. (2004)
Hg, Cd, Pb: Gray and Boyle (2002)
Dioxins/furans: U.S. EPA (2004b)
B(a)p, B(b)f, B(b)k: Ding et al. (2005)
Commercial and Institutional Fuel Combustion, Construction Fuel Combustion and Residential Fuel Combustion
- Description
-
Commercial and Institutional Fuel Combustion, Construction Fuel Combustion and Residential Fuel Combustion include emissions resulting primarily from external combustion sources used for space/water heating and material heating. Commercial establishments, health and educational institutions, government/public administration facilities, and residences all fall under these categories, in addition to construction sites.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Emissions are calculated for 10 types of fuel: natural gas, natural gas liquids, kerosene and stove oils, light fuel oil, heavy fuel oil, Canadian bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, lignite coal, anthracite coal and imported coal.
Total usage by fuel type and province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Statistics Canada (2015c)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO: U.S. EPA(1998)
(Emission factors are chosen to represent the typical type of combustion equipment for each fuel type.)TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO for natural gas fuel: U.S. EPA (2004a)
Sulphur contents of liquid fuels: EC (2010)
Sulphur contents of coal: CEA (2002)
NH3: Battye et al. (1994) ; Coe et al. (1996)
Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f: CARB (2005); U.S. EPA (1998, 2003, 2004a)
(Emission factors are selected to represent the typical type of combustion equipment for each fuel type.)
Commercial Cooking
- Description
-
Commercial Cooking includes emissions from cooking meat and French fries in commercial operations that are classified under five foodservice types: ethnic, fast food, family, seafood, and steak & BBQ. The types of meat considered include beef steak, hamburger, poultry with skin, poultry without skin, pork, seafood and other. Five types of commercial cooking equipment are taken into account including: chain driven charbroilers, underfired charbroilers, deep-fat fryers, flat griddles and clamshell griddles. The commercial operations inventoried are defined as all commercial foodservice points of distribution that are open to the public, offer prepared meals and snacks for consumption on/off-premises, and operate in a fixed location.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, VOCs, CO, B(a)p
Commercial Meat Cooking (1999 to 2014):
- Determined the number of restaurants in each province/territory that were classified as ethnic, fast food, family, seafood, steak & BBQ.
- Determined the fraction of restaurants with commercial cooking equipment (i.e. chain driven charbroilers, underfired charbroilers, deep-fat fryers, flat griddles and clamshell griddles), the average number of units of each type of equipment per restaurant, and the average amount of food cooked (i.e. steak, hamburger, poultry with skin, poultry without skin, pork, seafood and other) on each type of equipment.
- Applied pollutant-specific emission factors to each type of food for each type of commercial cooking equipment to get the final emission estimates.
Commercial Meat Cooking (1990 to 1998):
Emission estimates for 1999 were back-casted to 1990 using the gross domestic product (GDP) for NAICS [72]: Accommodation and Food Services (Statistics Canada 2007).
Commercial Cooking of French Fries (1990 to 2014):
The annual national consumption rate of frozen fries was multiplied by the annual provincial/territorial population and by a VOC-specific emission factor.
All Commercial Cooking (2015):
Emission estimates for 2014 were carried forward to 2015 since 2015 activity data were not available.
- Activity Data
-
Commercial Meat Cooking (1999 to 2014):
Activity data were estimated using:
- Annual restaurant census for Canada: ReCount Database (The NPD Group 2016)
- Statistics on the prevalence of commercial cooking equipment, for the five restaurant types (E.H. Pechan & Associates 2003)
- Statistics on the average number of pounds of meat cooked on each type of equipment per week for the seven types of meat (E.H. Pechan & Associates 2003)
Commercial Cooking of French Fries (1990 to 2014):
Activity data were estimated using:
- Provincial/territorial population data (Statistics Canada 2016b)
- Annual Canadian consumption rates of frozen fries (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service 2015)
- Assumed 80% of French fries were purchased in restaurants (E.H. Pechan & Associates 2003)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Commercial Meat Cooking:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, VOCs, CO, B(a)p: E.H.Pechan & Associates (2003)
Commercial Cooking of French Fries:
VOCs: EF = 0.21 g/kg (E.H. Pechan & Associates 2003)
Home Firewood Burning
- Description
-
Home Firewood Burning encompasses emissions from wood burned in urban and rural homes for primary and supplementary heating, as well as for aesthetics and hot water, in both main and secondary residences. This covers household wood-burning devices such as wood-burning fireplaces, wood stoves, pellet stoves, outdoor boilers and a variety of other devices used in limited quantities, such as wood-fired cooking stoves.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
The quantity of wood burned by device type and province is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors by device type.
- Activity Data
-
Activity data from Canadian Facts (1997, 2006) and TNS Canada (2012) are converted from volume to mass utilizing the reported wood species burnt. Wood consumption is interpolated and extrapolated from the three points (1996, 2006 and 2012) to the time series using statistical information on household wood-burning devices from Statistics Canada (1997, 2010) and Tracey (2014).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3: Gulland (2000)
Pb, Cd, Hg, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f: U.S. EPA (1995b)
Dioxins/furans: EC (2000)
Human
- Description
-
Sources of emissions in the Human sector include respiration and perspiration.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
NH3
Annual population data by province/territory are multiplied by an NH3 emission factor.
- Activity Data
-
Statistics Canada (2015b)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Roe et al. (2004)
EFNH3 = 0.0168 kg per person-year
Service Stations
- Description
-
Service Station estimates covers fugitive VOC emissions from fuel transfers and storage from refined petroleum products retail, as well as fugitive emissions from the refuelling of on- and off-road vehicles.
Off-road refuelling emissions include all non-vehicle gasoline usage (lawn mowers, snow blowers, etc.).
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
VOCs
Refined petroleum products retail
Emissions are calculated using gasoline usage data multiplied by emission factors for underground tank filling and breathing.
For British Columbia and Ontario, emissions from service stations are broken down into regulated versus unregulated areas. An emission control efficiency of 50% is applied to the filling of underground storage tanks in regulated areas in British Columbia and Ontario. The rest of the country is assumed to have no control efficiency.
Off-road refuelling
Off-road refuelling emissions are calculated using off-road gasoline usage data multiplied by an emission factor for uncontrolled vehicle refuelling.
On-road refuelling
On-road refuelling estimates are produced using the MOVES model. This year’s estimates were made using MOVES2014. Vehicle-specific activity (vehicle kilometres travelled) is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Refined petroleum products retail: Gross sales of gasoline for motor vehicles: (Statistics Canada 2015b)
Off-road refuelling: Off-road gasoline usage data (ECCC 2016)
On-road refuelling: Data on the vehicle fleet (counts), defined by fuel type, model-year and gross vehicle weight rating, originate from DesRosiers Automotive Consultants (DAC 2014) and R. L. Polk & Co. (Polk & Co. 2013) for light- and heavy-duty vehicles, respectively.
Motorcycle populations originate from the Road Motor Vehicle, Trailer and Snowmobile Registration database (Statistics Canada 2013). The Annual Industry Statistics report (MMIC 2013) is used to estimate the age distribution of motorcycles by model year which is applied to motorcycle populations obtained from Statistics Canada. The actual activity level is vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT). To arrive at estimates of VKT, vehicle counts are multiplied by mileage accumulation rates from Stewart-Brown Associates (Stewart-Brown 2012).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Refined petroleum products retail and off-road refuelling: Evaporative emissions from gasoline service station operations (U.S. EPA 2008)
On-road refuelling: Emission factors for on-road vehicles are embedded in the MOVES model. More information on MOVES is available online, in the U.S. EPA user guides (U.S. EPA 2012b, 2014b) and in the U.S. EPA technical guidance document (U.S. EPA 2010b).
Other Miscellaneous Sources
- Description
-
Emissions included under Other Miscellaneous Sources are from infant-diapered waste.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
NH3
An annual estimate of the population aged 0-3 years by province/territory is multiplied by an NH3 emission factor.
- Activity Data
-
Number of children aged 0-3 years by province/territory: Statistics Canada (2015a).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Roe et al. (2004)
EFNH3 = 0.0136 kg of NH3/person-year
Table A2-8: Estimation methodologies for incineration and waste (sector/subsector)
Crematoriums
- Description
-
Crematoriums clover emissions from the combustion of caskets and human bodies.
The combustion of fuel associated with the operation of a crematorium furnace or crematory fire is excluded from the sector. Fuel combustion emissions from cremations are captured under the Commercial Fuel Combustion sector.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, CO, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB
Number of human cremations per year by province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
Area source activity data is obtained from an annual report produced by the Cremation Association of North America (CANA): the Annual CANA Statistics Report 2012: Executive Summary (CANA 2013) and the draft Annual CANA Statistics Report (CANA 2016). Due to the unavailability of data, emission estimates are calculated using linear interpolation for all provinces/territories for the year 2001, and as well as Quebec for the years 2002-2007.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5: U.S. EPA (2014a)
VOCs, HCB: EMEP/EEA (2013)
SOx, NOx, CO: EMEP/EEA (2009)
Hg, Cd, Pb: U.S. EPA (2014a)
Dioxins/furans: U.S. EPA (2014a)
B(a)p, B(b)f, B(b)k, I(cd)p: U.S. EPA (2014a)
An average weight per body and casing of approximately 150 lbs. is assumed.
Industrial and Commercial Incineration
- Description
-
Industrial and Commercial Incineration involves the incineration of waste from industrial, commercial and institutional facilities. Emissions from the combustion of wood waste are included in Pulp and Paper Industry, Wood Products or Electric Power Generation.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2011 and were carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Methodology under review.
Municipal Incineration
- Description
-
The Municipal Incineration sector involves the incineration of domestic waste, as well as non-hazardous and industrial waste.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2011 and were carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Methodology under review.
Landfills (under Waste)
- Description
-
Landfills include emissions from disposal sites used for a variety of wastes, such as domestic, commercial, liquid and non-hazardous solid industrial wastes as well as sewage sludge. Disposal sites may be designated to receive only one or many of these waste materials. Materials deposited into landfills are covered daily with soil to prevent scattering of litter by wind, scavenging by animals, and odours. As a result, PM emissions are due to wind erosion, the movement of heavy vehicles and the dumping of waste.
The other main emissions from landfills include CH4 and CO2, with associated VOCs found in small concentrations in the fugitive landfill gas.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, VOCs
The quantity of waste landfilled for each province/territory is applied to PM emission factors.
VOC emissions are calculated as a concentration of the total fugitive landfill gas released, derived from CH4 emissions.
- Activity Data
-
Data for both provincial quantities of waste sent to landfills and CH4 emissions from landfills were obtained from the Waste and Open Sources Section of the Pollutant Inventories and Reporting Division of Environment and Climate Change Canada.Footnote9
CH4 emissions were estimated using the Landfill Air Emissions Estimation model, which is based on the Scholl Canyon model (U.S. EPA 1990)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM: BCMELP (1997)
PM10, PM2.5: GVRD and FVRD (2003). The EFPM10 is calculated using a distribution percentage of 8% of the EFTPM. The EFPM2.5 is calculated using a distribution percentage of 2% of the EFTPM.
VOCs: U.S. EPA (1995a). The default concentration of VOC in landfill gas is 835 ppmv.
Residential Waste Burning (under Waste)
- Description
-
Emissions from Residential Waste Burning are related to on-site burning of residential waste materials in backyard barrels or to open-pit burning in rural areas.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2014 and were carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Methodology under review.
Other Incineration and Utilities
- Description
-
Other Incineration and Utilities applies to emissions from sewage sludge incineration and other small incinerators.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2011 and were carried forward to 2015
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Methodology under review.
Table A2-9: Estimation methodologies for paints and solvents (sector/subsector)
Dry Cleaning, General Solvent Use, Printing and Surface Coatings
- Description
-
Dry Cleaning includes emissions from companies that provide dry cleaning of fabric and leather items.
General Solvent Use consists of emissions from a broad range of applications occurring in residential, commercial, industrial and institutional locations. Industrial applications include uses such as degreasing, adhesives and sealants, aerosols, blowing agents and resin manufacturing. The use of consumer and commercial products, pesticides and personal care products is also included under General Solvent Use.
Printing covers emissions from the manufacturing or use of printing inks. The sector consists of flexographic, gravure, letterpress, lithographic and other printing.
Surface Coatings encompasses emissions from a broad range of applications and industries, including individuals and companies engaged in the manufacturing or use of paints and coatings.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
VOCs
The analysis methodology used is largely a “top-down” national mass balance approach that involves gathering statistical activity data on the production, distribution, end-use patterns and disposal of VOC-containing products, and then building relationships between stages. However, more detailed data on solvent quantities and practices are collected from a subset of solvent and formulated product users, producers and distributors in Canada.
- Activity Data
-
Solvent use quantities (1990 to 2004): Cheminfo (2007)
Solvent use quantities (2005 to 2014): Cheminfo (2016a)
Twenty-nine commercially sold solvents, defined as VOCs under CEPA 1999, are inventoried.Footnote10
Domestic consumption is determined using a national mass balance approach:
Consumption = Production + Imports - Exports +/- Inventory Changes
“Inventory changes” are a volume buffer between total supply (production and imports) and total demand (domestic consumption and exports) (Cheminfo 2016a). For most solvents, the value is zero because of a lack of detailed data on inventory changes (Cheminfo 2016a).
Information on production, trade and inventory changes is obtained from various literature sources, Statistics Canada and interviews with a subset of solvent producers and distributors.
Domestic consumption estimates are allocated to many reactive and emissive application areas. The default allocation basis in many cases is the historical distribution of solvent use from previous studies (Cheminfo 2016a). Survey questionnaire results, input from telephone consultations and literature sources are used to develop solvent use and VOC estimates for each solvent and application (Cheminfo 2016a).
Allocation to the provinces and territories is based on macroeconomic indicators, such as population, households and the gross domestic product (GDP) of commercial services and manufacturing (Cheminfo 2016a). For some industrial applications, specific allocations are derived from previous sector-specific studies (Cheminfo 2016a).
Projected estimates of national total solvent use for the year 2015 were developed based on historical base year national total solvent use and macroeconomic growth and solvent growth ratios (Cheminfo 2016b).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
The estimated use of emission control technologies is applied in each solvent application area. More specifically, emissions are calculated by taking the estimated quantity of solvent used in an application area and multiplying it by the estimated percentage of uncontrolled VOCs or:
EVOCs= Quantitysolventused ×(100%-% ControlledVOCs)
where EVOCs is the emission estimate of VOCs.
Emission controls (1990 to 2004): Cheminfo (2007)
Emission controls (2005 to 2014): Cheminfo (2016a)
If there is no estimated use of control technologies, then 100% of the solvent VOCs is assumed to evaporate.
Only a small portion of the estimated VOC emissions is reduced by the application of control technologies. Control efficiencies are applied (as percentages) in the following applications: flexographic, rotogravure and lithographic printing, aircraft coatings, automotive original equipment manufacture (OEM) coatings, metal can manufacturing, metal coil coating, metal furniture manufacturing, adhesives and sealants, and resin manufacturing (Cheminfo 2016).
Table A2-10: Estimation methodologies for dust (sector/subsector)
Coal Transportation
- Description
-
Coal Transportation includes PM emissions resulting from the transportation of coal. Most of the coal mined in Canada is carried to trans-shipment or export terminals by unit trains. Coal imported into Canada is shipped in lake vessels. Some minor amounts of coal are shipped by truck (CCME 2001).
Load-in and load-out losses are estimated and reported by mine facilities to the NPRI as part of fugitive emissions. Emissions from fuel combustion during coal transport (diesel, gasoline or oil) are inventoried separately as part of the Mobile Sources category.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Average emission factors are derived from the quantities of coal transported, the distance travelled and the type of containment of the coal (control, closed environment, covered wagon, etc.) (CCME 2001). Resulting emission factors are multiplied by annual coal production by province/territory.
- Activity Data
-
National and provincial coal production: NRCan (2015)
Monthly climate summaries: EC (2015c)
Monthly climate summaries: EC (2015c)
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
CCME (2001)
Construction Operations
- Description
-
Construction Operations include PM emissions primarily resulting from soil disturbance on construction sites. The amount of soil disturbance is related to the surface area and duration of a construction project. The geographic region, type of construction (residential, industrial-commercial-institutional [ICI], engineering) and soil characteristics are all considered.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2012 and are carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
Mine Tailings
- Description
-
Mine Tailings covers emissions of particulates resulting primarily from wind erosion at mine tailings ponds located on active and inactive mine sites.
Concentrators used for mining produce both a finely-milled concentrate rich in the desired metal(s) and a solids-laden mine tailings stream. This slurry is sent to a tailings pond where the solids settle out of suspension and the supernatant solution is either recycled back in the process or discharged as effluent. It is common practice to keep the solids in the tailings pond submerged, even when the mine is inactive or closed. If the solids in the pond are no longer submerged, fugitive particulate emissions occur through wind dispersion.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2005 and are carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Methodology under review.
Paved Roads
- Description
-
Emissions from the Paved Road Dust sector originate from primary and secondary (re-suspended) PM emissions.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Primary emissions are produced by multiplying the total vehicle kilometers travelled for each province/territory by pollutant-specific emissions factors.
The methodology for secondary (re-suspended) emissions is currently under review. The emissions were last estimated for 2002 and have been carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Primary - Vehicle kilometres travelled (VKT) are estimated by multiplying vehicle counts by mileage accumulation rates from Stewart-Brown Associates (Stewart-Brown 2012).
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Primary - EMEP/EEA (2013)
Secondary - Methodology under review.
Unpaved Roads
- Description
-
Emissions from the Unpaved Road Dust sector originate from re-suspended PM emissions.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2002 and have been carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Methodology under review.
Table A2-11: Estimation methodologies for fires (sector/subsector)
Prescribed Forest Burning
- Description
-
Prescribed Forest Burning includes emissions from controlled fires used for land management treatments. Prescribed burning is used to reduce logging residues, manage forest production, control insects and minimize potential for destructive wildfires. The practice of prescribed burning is carried out by the logging industry and forestry officials to manage Crown lands. This sector excludes the burning of agricultural residues.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p
Total annual mass of forest debris burned by fire and by province/territory is multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
The total number of hectares burned in each province/territory per year (CIFFC 2016; PCA 2016; NFD 2016) is multiplied by a conversion factor for each province/territory (EC 1992) to convert the area burned into the mass of forest debris burned. Pollutant and province-specific emission factors are then applied to the mass of forest debris to determine the release of pollutants from the burn.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3:
All provinces/territories (except British Columbia): U.S. EPA (1995a)
British Columbia: GVRD and FVRD (2003), BCMWLAP (2004).
Dioxins/furans, B(b)f, B(k)f: Lemieux et al. (2004)
B(a)p, I(cd)p: Johnson et al. (1992)
Structural Fires
- Description
-
Structural Fires cover emissions from vehicle fires (such as fires from cars, trains and airplanes) and fires that burn buildings. Structural fires emit large quantities of pollutants due to rapid but incomplete combustion.
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3
Tonnes of structures burned per year, by province/territory, are multiplied by pollutant-specific emission factors.
- Activity Data
-
The Secretary/Treasurer of the Council of Canadian Fire Marshals and Fire CommissionersFootnote11 (CCMFC) and the following members of the CCMFC are contacted to obtain the number of annual structural fires in their jurisdictions:
- Government of NunavutFootnote12
- Fire and Emergency Services, Newfoundland and LabradorFootnote13
- Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management (Ontario)Footnote14
- Office of the Fire Commissioner (Manitoba)Footnote15
- Emergency Management and Fire Safety Branch (Saskatchewan)Footnote16
- Canadian Forces Fire MarshalFootnote17
- Office of Public Safety (Prince Edward Island)Footnote18
- Yukon GovernmentFootnote19
- Department of Labour and Advanced Education (Nova Scotia)Footnote20
- Department of Municipal and Community Affairs (Government of the Northwest Territories)Footnote21
- Department of Public Safety (New Brunswick)Footnote22
- Office of the Fire Commissioner (Alberta)Footnote23
- Emergency Management British ColumbiaFootnote24
- Ministère de la Sécurité publiqueFootnote25
Number of structure fires in each province/territory is multiplied by a loading factor to convert the number of fires into tonnes of structure burned (EIIP 2001).
Loading factor = 1.04 t of structure burned/fire
Due to the unavailability of activity data, emission estimates for 2001, 2002 and 2004 are calculated using linear interpolation.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
TPM, PM10, PM2.5, NOx, VOCs, CO: GVRD and FVRD (2003)
NH3: Battye et al. (1994)
Table A2-12: Estimation methodology for mercury in products (sector/subsector)
Mercury in Products
- Description
-
Mercury in Products covers emissions from Hg contained in products throughout their life cycle from manufacture to final disposition. The following products are included:
- Automotive switches
- Switches and relays
- Batteries
- Dental amalgams
- Fluorescent tubes
- Non-fluorescent lamps
- Measurement and control devices
- Thermometers
- Thermostats
- Tire balancers
Emissions from the above devices impact the following sectors/subsectors:
- Iron and Steel Industries - (Secondary) Electric Arc Furnaces
- Iron and Steel Industries - Steel Recycling
- Electronics
- Other Manufacturing
- Municipal Incineration
- Other Incineration
- Human
- Other Miscellaneous Sources
- Landfills
- Water and Sewage Treatment
- Residential Waste Burining
- General Inventory Method
-
Pollutant(s) Estimated:
Hg
Methodology under review.
The area source emissions were last estimated for 2008 and have been carried forward to 2015.
- Activity Data
-
Methodology under review.
- Emission Factors (EF)
-
Methodology under review.
A2.3 Recalculations
Emission recalculation is an essential practice in the maintenance of up-to-date and internally consistent trends in air pollutant emissions. Circumstances that warrant a change or refinement of data and/or methods include:
- Available data have changed.
- New inventory methods have become available.
- The previously used method is inconsistent with good practice.
- An emissions source category has become a key category.
- The previously used method is not representative of practices or technologies.
- Previously undetected errors are corrected
Recalculations of point source emission data previously reported from the NPRI are not conducted systematically. Rather, some facilities recalculate their point source emission estimates as new emission factors become available and resubmit a previous emissions report to the NPRI as an update. Generally, these recalculations by facilities are completed for only a few years in their historical emissions.
In contrast, new activity data are incorporated into the area source estimates as they become available, and these updates are reflected in the trends on an ongoing basis. Updated trends, based on updated point source and area source data, are published on a yearly basis. For example, the calculation of emissions from the asphalt paving industry, commercial fuel combustion, residential fuel combustion, agricultural fuel use and construction fuel combustion sectors rely on fuel use quantities from the Statistics Canada publication Report on Energy Supply and Demand in Canada (RESD), which is not available until December of each year (Statistics Canada 2015c). As a result, the emission estimates for these sectors are based on the 2014 activity data and are carried over to the 2015 inventory year pending the availability of activity data for 2015. Once Statistics Canada RESD data are available, the area source estimates for these sectors will be updated.
Emissions in the following area sources were recalculated for the 2017 edition of the APEI. Brief descriptions of the recalculations and the impacts on emission levels are provided in Tables A2-13 to Table A2-23.
- Ore and mineral industries: asphalt paving; cement and concrete; rock, sand and gravel; and silica production;
- Oil and gas industry: refined petroleum products bulk storage and distribution; natural gas distribution; natural gas transmission and upstream petroleum industry;
- Manufacturing: panel board mills and sawmills;
- Transportation and mobile equipment: marine transportation; on-road vehicles; and off-road vehicles and equipment;
- Agriculture: animal production; fertilizer application; harvesting; tillage practices; wind erosion and fuel use;
- Commercial/Residential/Institutional: commercial and institutional fuel combustion; construction fuel combustion; commercial cooking; human; residential fuel combustion; service stations and other miscellaneous sources;
- Incineration and waste sources: crematoriums; industrial and commercial incineration; municipal incineration; landfills; other incineration and utilities; and residential waste burning;
- Paints and solvents: dry cleaning; general solvent use; printing and surface coatings;
- Dust: paved roads and unpaved roads;
- Fires: prescribed forest burning;
- Mercury in products: ore and mineral industries; manufacturing; commercial / residential / institutional; and incineration and waste.
For the purpose of Tables A2-13 to A2-23, the term “significant” refers to changes greater than +/-10% in emission levels.
Sector/Subsector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Asphalt Paving | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB | The activity data have been updated from a more recent RESD edition | The recalculations resulted in no significant changes in emission levels (+/- >10%) for 1990. The recalculations resulted in the following changes in 2014 at the national level: +18% (+6 kt) for TPM, +18% (+1.3 kt) for PM10, +18% (0.28 kt) for PM2.5, +16% (88 t) for SOx, +21% (+200 t) for NOx, +50% (+2.8 kt) for VOCs, +20% (0.66 kt) for CO, +14% (+2.6 kg) for Cd, +16% (+3.0 kg) for Hg and +17% (+1.9 kg) for PAHs. |
Cement and Concrete | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, Pb and Cd. | The recalculations were done using updated activity data. | No significant changes in emission levels (greater than +/-10%) resulted for 1990. For 2014, estimates for all pollutants increased by 10% (TPM +4.0 kt, PM10 +1.2 kt, PM2.5 +0.6 kt, Pb +10 kg, Cd +0.10 kg). |
Rock, Sand and Gravel (under Mining and Rock Quarrying) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | Recalculations of emission estimates for 1990-2015 were due to changes in emission factors. Emission factors are now taken from the EMEP/EEA 2013 Guidebook’s Tier 1 emission factors for Quarrying and mining of minerals other than coal. Activity level data for the complete time series was updated to reflect the most recent information from NRCan. |
The methodology and activity level data updates resulted in both increases and decreases to the particulate matter area source estimates. In 1990, the significant changes at the national level were +59% for TPM (+30 kt) and -51% for PM10 (-13 kt). In 2014, the significant changes at the national level were +72% for TPM (+41 kt) and -53% for PM10 (-15 kt). The recalculations did not result in changes in PM2.5 emissions of greater than +/-10% in 1990 and 2014 |
Silica Production (under Mining and Rock Quarrying) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | Recalculations of emissions estimates for 1990-2015 were due to changes in emission factors. Silica production estimates are no longer distributed into fine and coarse silica production, and are now multiplied by the EMEP/EEA 2013 Guidebook’s Tier 1 emission factors for Quarrying and mining of minerals other than coal. Activity level data for the complete time series was updated to reflect the most recent information from NRCan. | Emissions are reduced over the complete time series for all pollutants. In 1990, changes at the national level were -89% for TPM (-1.6 kt), -43% for PM10 (-0.076 kt), and -81% for PM2.5 (-0.042 kt). In 2014, changes at the national level were 84% for TPM (1.1 kt), 21% for PM10 (0.027 kt), and -73% for PM2.5 (0.028 kt). |
Sector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Refined Petroleum Products Bulk Storage and Distribution (under Downstream Petroleum Industry) | VOCs | Recalculations occurred for the entire time series as a result of updated activity level data being made available. | The recalculations did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than +/-10% for VOCs in 1990 or 2014. |
Natural Gas Distribution (under Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO | Recalculations occurred for recent years (2011 through current) as a result of updated activity data being made available. | For 2014, on a national level, the updated activity level data resulted in significant changes to VOC emissions only; VOC estimates changed by -12% (-0.024 kt). The recalculations resulted in changes in emission levels of less than +/-10% in 2014 for the rest of the pollutants. |
Natural Gas Transmission (under Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3 | Recalculations occurred for recent years (2011 through current) as a result of updated activity data being made available. | For 2014, on a national level, the updated activity level data resulted in significant changes to NH3 emissions only; NH3 estimates changed by -22% (-0.00041 kt). The recalculations resulted in changes in emission levels of less than +/-10% in 2014 for the rest of the pollutants. |
Upstream Petroleum Industry | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3 | Recalculations occurred for recent years (2011 through current) as a result of updated activity data being made available. | The recalculations did not result in changes greater than +/-10% for any of the pollutants in 2014. |
Sector/Subsector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Panel Board Mills (under Wood Industry) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | Data omission corrections for the pollutants TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 for the years 1990 to 2014. | There were no changes in the emission levels of any of the pollutants for 1990 with the exceptions of TPM, PM10 and PM2.5. Emissions changed by +100% for all three pollutants, amounting to +4043 t, +2348 t and +769 t, respectively. For the year 2014, there were no changes in the emission levels of any of the pollutants. |
Sawmills (Subsector of Wood Products) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | Data omission corrections for the pollutants TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 for the years 1990 to 2014. | There were no changes in the emission levels of any of the pollutants for 1990, with the exceptions of TPM, PM10 and PM2.5. Emissions changed by +100% for all three pollutants, amounting to +6275 t, +2241 t and +829 t, respectively. For the year 2014, there were no changes in the emission levels of any of the pollutants. |
Sector | Pollutants | Fuel | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marine Transportation | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB | Heavy Fuel Oil, Marine Diesel Oil, Marine Gasoline Oil | Model updates from Marine Emissions Inventory Tool v.4.0 to v.4.3.1, new interpolation for the years between 2010 and 2015, and removal of evaporative emissions from transported fuel. | The recalculations for 1990 resulted in significant changes in VOC emissions (-53% or -6.5 kt). The recalculations did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than 10% for any of the other pollutants in 1990. The recalculations for 2014 resulted in significant changes in the emissions of TPM (+120% or +8.2 kt), PM10 (+120% or +7.9 kt), PM2.5 (+120% or +7.3 kt), SOx (+284% or +80 kt) and VOCs (-48% or -8.9 kt). The recalculations did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than 10% for any of the other pollutants in 2014. |
On-road Vehicles (Includes the following sectors: Heavy-duty diesel vehicles, Heavy-duty gasoline trucks, Heavy-duty LPG/NG vehicles, Light-duty diesel trucks, Light-duty diesel vehicles, Light-duty gasoline trucks, Light-duty gasoline vehicles, Light-duty LPG/CNG vehicles, Light-duty LPG/CNG trucks, Motorcycles, Tire Wear & Brake Lining) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p | All transport fuels | Update of MOVES version (2010 to 2014).Footnote26 In addition to broadly updating all pollutant emissions rates, PM10 is now directly estimated with MOVES rather than using a ratio to PM2.5. Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) aligns estimates of on- and off-road fuel use with fuel data in the RESD. This is now done on a provincial, rather than a national basis. The activity data have been updated to a more recent edition of the RESD. |
The recalculations for 1990 resulted in significant changes in the emissions of TPM (-34% or -19 kt), PM10 (-34% or -19 kt), PM2.5 (43% or -21 kt), SOx (-55% or -35 kt), VOCs (-47% or 333 kt), CO (-25% or 1878 kt), NOx (-34% or 367 kt), NH3 (-25% or 1.7 kt), dioxins/furans (100% or -3.4 g-TEQ), B(a)p (-99% or -1.0 t), B(b)f (-100% or -1.2 t), B(k)f (100% or -1.2 t) and I(cd)p (-99% or -0.6 t). The recalculations for 2014 resulted in significant changes in the emissions of PM2.5 (-19% or -3.4 kt), VOCs (-23% or -39 kt), CO (-19% or -374 kt), NH3 (11% or -0.8 kt), dioxins/furans (-100% or 11 g-TEQ), B(a)p (-99% or -0.2 t), B(b)f (-99% or 0.2 t), B(k)f (-99% or 0.2 t) and I(cd)p (-98% or -0.1 t). The recalculations did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than 10% for any of the other pollutants in 2014. Hg emissions were not estimated using the previous methodology, so there are no values to compare against for 1990 or 2014. Pb emissions were not estimated using the current methodology, so there are no values to compare against for 1990 or 2014. |
Off-road Vehicles and Equipment | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3 |
All transport fuels | ECCC aligns estimates of on- and off-road fuel use with fuel data in the RESD. This is now done on a provincial, rather than a national basis. The activity data have been updated to a more recent edition of the RESD. | The recalculations for 1990 resulted in significant changes in the emissions of TPM (-32% or -25 kt), PM10 (-31% or -24 kt), PM2.5 (31% or -23 kt), SOx (-14% or -4.5 kt), VOCs (-61% or 1013 kt), CO (-59% or 2899 kt), NOx (-17% or 75 kt) and NH3 (45% or 0.25 kt). The recalculations for 2014 resulted in significant changes in the emissions of TPM (-18% or -4.2 kt), PM10 (-18% or -4.2 kt), PM2.5 (18% or -4.0 kt), SOx (-17% or -0.05 kt), VOCs (-23% or -51 kt), CO (-18% or 299 kt), NOx (17% or 41 kt) and NH3 (-18% or -0.06 kt). B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f and I(cd)p emissions were not estimated using the current methodology, so there are no values to compare against for 1990 or 2014. |
Sector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Animal Production | NH3, VOCs | A new animal category, mules and asses, was added, and corrections were made to populations of fox, mink and rabbit. The corrections predominantly impacted populations prior to the 2011 census. Modifications to cropland areas occurred this year to reduce differences between earth observation and census estimates of provincial cropland. The modifications to areas also caused a minor redistribution of livestock within provinces, and since NH3 emission factors are ecoregion-based, resulted in small changes to emissions. A new tier 1 methodology for estimating non-methane VOCs was implemented based on EMEP guidelines (see methodological description). |
The recalculations did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than 10% for NH3 in 1990 or 2014. The recalculated emissions decreased by 128 kt or 57% in 1990, and by 153 kt or 61% in 2014. |
Fertilizer Application (under Crop Production) | NH3 | Modifications to cropland areas were carried out this year in order to reduce differences between earth observation and census estimates of provincial cropland areas. Earth observation-based cropland categories were reconciled using provincial scaling factors. This resulted in changes in areas of annual and perennial crops, and thus the distribution of synthetic N between annual and perennial crop also changed. | The recalculations did not result in changes of greater than 10% in emission levels for NH3 in 1990 or 2014. |
Harvesting (under Crop Production) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | The update to activity data on areas of annual crops as a result of reconciliation between earth observation and census estimates of annual provincial crop areas, noted in the ammonia recalculation section, resulted in an increase of 2 Mha in the area of annual cropland in 1990, and a decrease of 2.2 Mha in 2014 compared with the 2016 APEIR. | As a result of these changes, emissions of TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 increased by 20.1 kt, 9.2 kt, and 1.8 kt or 6.7% in 1990, and decreased by 14.7 kt, 6.7 kt, and 1.3 kt or 5.8% in 2014, respectively. |
Tillage Practices (under Crop Production) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | In addition to the changes in areas of annual and perennial crops as a result of reconciliation between earth observation and census estimates of annual provincial crop areas, compared with the 2016 APEIR, the areas of conventional tillage, reduced tillage and no-till increased by 1.3 Mha, 0.6 Mha, and 0.1 Mha, respectively, in 1990 and decreased by 0.3 Mha, 0.5 Mha, and 1.4 Mha in 2014, respectively. | Emissions of TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 increased by 195 kt, 40.9 kt and 19.5 kt or 6.0% in 1990, and decreased by 84.5 kt, 17.8 kt, and 8.5 kt or 8.2% in 2014, respectively. |
Wind Erosion (under Crop Production) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | The update on activity data noted under Tillage Practices further impacted Wind Erosion estimates. | Emissions of TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 increased by 25.1 kt, 12.5 kt, and 2.5 kt or 0.8% in 1990, and decreased by 195 kt, 97.5 kt, and 19.5 kt or 8.6% in 2014, respectively. |
Fuel Use | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/ furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB | The activity data have been updated to a more recent edition of the RESD. | Comparing with the year 1990, the recalculations resulted in the following changes: +20% (+32 t) for TPM; +16% (+20 t) for PM10. There were no significant changes in emission levels (greater than +/-10%) for any of the other pollutants in 1990. For the year 2014, recalculation resulted in the following changes: +407% (+624 t) for TPM, +265% (+390 t) for PM10, +97% (+140 t) for PM2.5 and -29% (0.01 kg) for B(a)p, The rest of the pollutant emissions changed by less than +/-10% in 2014. |
Sector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on Emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Commercial and Institutionnel Fuel Combustion | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB | The activity data have been updated to a more recent edition of the RESD. | Comparing with the year 1990, the recalculations resulted in the following changes: +32% (+679 t) for TPM, +22% (+421 kt) for PM10. For all other pollutants, there were no significant changes in emission levels (changes were less than +/-10%). For the year 2014, TPM changed by +17% (+380 t), PM10 by +13% (290 t), SOx by -29% (-1300 t), NH3 by +18% (34 t), Pb by +16% (26 kg), PAHs by +15% (0.31 kg) and D/F by +23% (0.04 g-TEQ). The rest of the pollutant emissions changed by less than +/-10% in 2014. |
Construction Fuel Combustion | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB | The activity data have been updated to a more recent edition of the RESD. | Comparing with the year 1990, the recalculations resulted in the following changes: +41% (+78 t) for TPM, +27% (+48 t) for PM10, and +11% (+18 t) for PM2.5. For all other pollutants, there were no significant changes in emission levels (changes were less than +/-10%. For the year 2014, TPM changed by -37% (-77 t), PM10 by -28% (-47 t), PM2.5 by -13% (-15 t), NOx by -12% (-232 t), NH3 by -12% (4.3 t), Pb by 51% (6.5 kg), Cd emissions by -14% (-1.4 kg), Hg by -17% (0.4 kg), D/F by 39% (0.01 g-TEQ) and PAHs by -58% (-0.27 kg). The rest of the pollutant emissions changed by less than +/-10% in 2014. |
Commercial Cooking | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, VOCs, CO, B(a)p | A new estimation methodology was implemented for the time series (Pechan & Associates 2003). As a result, two new pollutants were estimated (VOCs and CO). | The recalculations resulted in significant increases in emission levels of all pollutants for all years. For 1990, TPM and PM10 changed by +449% (+12 241 t), PM2.5 by +409% (+11 129 t) and B(a)p by +9464% (+100 kg). For the year 2014, TPM and PM10 changed by +408% (+13 934 t), PM2.5 by +370% (+12 648 t), and B(a)p by +10930% (+116 kg). |
Human | NH3, Hg | Updated population data by province and territory were incorporated into the time series. The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions from 2009 to 2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. |
The recalculations had little to no impact on the emission levels of NH3. Changes ranged from 0% to 3% (or 0.02 kt). |
Residential Fuel Combustion | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB | The activity data have been updated to a more recent edition of the RESD. | The recalculations did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than 10% for any of the pollutants in 1990. In 2014, the recalculations resulted in a+14% change in Hg (+9.7 kg) and a -96% (-4200 t) change in SOx The rest of the pollutant emissions changed by less than +/-10% in 2014. |
Service Stations | VOCs | Refined petroleum products retail: The estimation methodology for service stations has been changed from a growth factor approach to use of emission factors from U.S. EPA AP-42. The emissions from refuelling on-road vehicles have been removed as they are already included in on-road estimates for recalculation purposes. Off-road refuelling: The activity data have been updated to a more recent edition of the RESD. On-road refuelling: Quantification of the impact of the new methodology for estimates of emissions from refuelling of on-road vehicles cannot be calculated because emissions from this source were not calculated separately in the previous estimation methods. The recalculations of VOC emissions related to refuelling of on-road vehicles estimates are included in Table A2-16 for on-road vehicles. |
Refined petroleum products retail: The recalculations did not result in changes greater than +/-10% for any of the pollutants in 1990 and 2014. Off-road refuelling: The recalculations resulted in a -63% (9900 t) decrease in VOC estimates for 1990, and a -25% (990 t) change in VOC estimates for 2014. |
Other Miscellaneous Sources | NH3, Hg | Updated population data by province and territory were incorporated into the time series. The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions for 2009-2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. |
The recalculations resulted in changes in NH3 and Hg emission levels of less than +/-10% in 1990 and 2014. |
Sector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Crematoriums | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB | Activity data for the years 2008-2014 were updated to correspond with the most recent report by the Cremation Association of North America (CANA, 2016). This report includes a new data source for cremation data from Quebec. Data for the years 2002-2007 were updated to correspond with CANA’s 2013 report. Interpolation was required to fill a data gap for 2001 for all provinces. Inconsistencies in data sources for Quebec required the interpolation of Quebec activity data for the years 2002-2007. |
The update in activity data did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than +/-10% for any of the pollutants for 1990 or 2014. |
Industrial and Commercial Incineration | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, HCB | QC was performed to update obsolete data. | There were no changes to emissions in 1990. In 2014, TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 changed by -46% (-11 t), -48% (-8 t) and -29% (-3 t), respectively. Cd changed by 77% (-2 kg), while Hg (105 kg), dioxins/furans (0.44 g-TEQ) and HCB (-41 g) all changed by -100%. Emissions of all other pollutants changed by less than +/-10% in 2014. |
Municipal Incineration | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans | Previously, area source emissions were not estimated after 2011. Pending a full methodology review, the 2011 reporting year data are now carried forward through 2015. The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions for 2009-2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. |
Hg changed by +13% (+48 kg) in 1990 and by +245% (+327 kg) in 2014. No other emissions changed in 1990. In 2014, all emissions excluding Hg changed by +100%. Emissions increased by 10 t for TPM, 2 t for PM10, 1 t for PM2.5, 129 t for SOx, 153 t for NOx, 38 t for VOCs, 56 t for CO, 19 t for NH3, 146 kg for Pb, 26 kg for Cd, and 0.000004 g-TEQ for dioxins/furans. |
Landfills (under Waste) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, VOCs, Hg | PM10 and PM2.5 distribution percentages of TPM were updated in all provinces except BC. The methodology for VOCs was updated based on the U.S. EPA AP-42 to account for current landfilling practices in Canada. New VOC concentrations in fugitive landfill gas were used. Activity data was updated across the whole time series for the amount of methane gas released and the amount of waste landfilled. The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions for 2009-2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. |
PM10 and PM2.5 changed by +347% (+843 t) and +396% (+241 t) in 1990 and by +217% (+967 t) and +239% (+277 t) in 2014, respectively. VOCs changed by 41% (4583 t) and 8% (-635 t) in 1990 and 2014, respectively. Neither TPM nor Hg changed by more than +/-10%. |
Residential Waste Burning (under Waste) | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p, HCB | The 2014 data was carried forward until a full methodology review can be completed. The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions for 2009-2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. |
In 2014, Hg emissions increased by 131% (+91 kg). No other emissions changed by more than +/-10%. |
Other Incineration and Utilities | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, Pb, Cd, Hg, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p | QC was performed to update obsolete data. A change in methodology was implemented for mercury in products. |
The only change in 1990 was an increase of +51% (+194 kg) in Hg. In 2014, TPM (+50 t), PM10 (+5 t), PM2.5 (+1 t), NOx (+169 t), NH3 (+20 t), Pb (+5 kg), Cd (+2 kg) all increased by 75%. CO emissions changed by +10% (+177 t), Hg by +100% (+218 kg) and dioxins/furans by +100% (+0.00 g-TEQ). SOx and VOC emissions did not change by more than +/-10%. |
Sector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Dry Cleaning | VOCs | Corrections made by Cheminfo to their 2016(a) study resulted in changes in the VOC emission estimates for 2005 to 2014. | Resulted in a change in VOC emission levels of less than +/-10% in 2005 and -11% or -19 t in 2014. |
General Solvent Use | VOCs | Corrections made by Cheminfo to their 2016(a) study resulted in changes in the VOC emission estimates for 2005 to 2014. | Resulted in a change in VOC emission levels of less than +/-10% in 2005 and 2014. |
Printing | VOCs | Corrections made by Cheminfo to their 2016(a) study resulted in changes in the VOC emission estimates for 2005 to 2014. | Resulted in a change in VOC emission levels of less than +/-10% in 2005 and +20% or +3139 t in 2014. |
Surface Coatings | VOCs | Corrections made by Cheminfo to their 2016(a) study resulted in changes in the VOC emission estimates for 2005 to 2014. | Resulted in a change in VOC emission levels of less than +/-10% in 2005 and +11% or +7361 t in 2014. |
Sector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on Emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Paved Roads | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | A new estimation methodology was implemented for primary emissions from paved road dust. The estimation methodology for secondary emissions from paved and unpaved road dust is under review as it has not been updated since 2002. Previously, the emissions from 2003 to 2014 were driven by vehicle kilometers travelled. In this update, values are held constant from the last time the emissions were calculated using the former methodology. An updated methodology will be implemented for the entire time series. |
The recalculations did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than +/-10% for any of the pollutants in 1990. The recalculation for 2014 resulted in significant changes in the emissions of TPM (-19% or -679 kt), PM10 (-19% or -130 kt) and PM2.5 (-19% or -31 kt). |
Unpaved Roads | TPM, PM10, PM2.5 | The estimation methodology for secondary emissions from unpaved road dust is under review as it has not been updated since 2002. Previously, the emissions from 2003 to 2014 were driven by vehicle kilometers travelled. In this update, values are held constant from the last time the emissions were calculated using the former methodology. An updated methodology will be implemented for the entire time series. | The recalculations did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than +/-10% for any of the pollutants in 1990. The recalculation for 2014 resulted in significant changes in emissions of TPM (-23% or -2234 kt), PM10 (-23% or -701 kt) and PM2.5 (-23% or -105 kt). |
Sector | Pollutants | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Prescribed Forest Burning | TPM, PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx, VOCs, CO, NH3, dioxins/furans, B(a)p, B(b)f, B(k)f, I(cd)p | Parks Canada reassessed all prescribed burn data from 1990 to 2015 and provided an updated time series of activity data. | The updated activity data did not result in changes in emission levels of greater than +/-10% for any of the pollutants in 1990 or 2014. |
Sector | Pollutant | Description | Impact on emissions |
---|---|---|---|
Ore and Mineral Industries | Hg | The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions for 2009-2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. | The recalculations did not result in changes greater than +/-10% for Hg in 1990. In 2014, Hg changed by -46% or -174 kg. |
Manufacturing | Hg | The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions for 2009-2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. | The recalculations did not result in changes greater than +/-10% for Hg in 1990. In 2014, Hg changed by -81% or -14 kg. |
Commercial / Residential / Institutional | Hg | The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions for 2009-2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. | The recalculations did not result in changes greater than +/-10% for Hg in 1990. In 2014, Hg changed by -81% or -14 kg. |
Incineration and Waste | Hg | The estimation methodologies for mercury in products are under review. The methodology used to estimate emissions for 2009-2014 is deemed unreliable. In the current inventory, emissions are held constant (at their 2008 levels) until a revised methodology is implemented for the entire time series. | The recalculations did not result in changes greater than +/-10% for Hg in 1990. In 2014, Hg changed by -17% or -172 kg. |
A2.4 Point source emissions
This section presents the procedures used to incorporate point sources into the APEI.
Information on emissions from point sources was provided by the provinces for 1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000. In some cases, additional information was provided to fill in intervening years or to update the original submissions. Trends for the intervening years were estimated using interpolation techniques. The compilation of emissions for 2001-2005 occurred during a transition to using emissions data reported to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) as the major source of industrial emissions. In general, point source information from the NPRI and data provided by the provinces were used for the 2002, 2004 and 2005 inventories, and interpolation was used for 2001 and 2003.
Since 2005, information on point source emissions has originated mainly from the NPRI, with limited data obtained from provincial governments (Alberta, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Ontario and Quebec) on selected sources that are not reported to the NPRI.
The NPRI groups the substances into the five parts listed below. Each part has its own reporting thresholds or triggers of mandatory reporting.
- Part 1A - Core Substances, and Part 1B - Alternate Threshold Substances
- Part 2 - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
- Part 3 - Dioxins, Furans and Hexachlorobenzene
- Part 4 - Criteria Air Contaminants (CACs)
- Part 5 - Speciated Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Table A2-24 shows the 17 air pollutants reported in the APEI and their NPRI reporting thresholds. Details on the NPRI reporting requirements for each substance group are available in the Guide for Reporting to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) 2014 and 2015) (EC 2015d). No VOC data collected under Part 5 is used in the APEI.
Substance | NPRI Part # (threshold category) | Mass threshold | Concentration threshold |
---|---|---|---|
Ammonia | 1A | 10 tonnes MPO | MPO by weight of ≥ 1% |
Benzo(a)pyrene | 2 | 50 kg total PAHs | N/A |
Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 2 | 50 kg total PAHs | N/A |
Benzo(k)fluoranthene | 2 | 50 kg total PAHs | N/A |
Cadmium | 1B | 5 kg MPO | MPO by weight of ≥ 0.1% |
Carbon monoxide | 4 | 20 tonnes air release | N/A |
Dioxins and furans | 3 | Activity-based | N/A |
Hexachlorobenzene | 3 | Activity-based | N/A |
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene | 2 | 50 kg total PAHs | N/A |
Lead | 1B | 50 kg MPO | MPO by weight of ≥ 0.1% |
Mercury | 1B | 5 kg MPO | N/A |
Nitrogen oxides | 4 | 20 tonnes air release | N/A |
PM10 - particulate matter ≤ 10 microns | 4 | 0.5 tonnes air release | N/A |
PM2.5 - particulate matter ≤ 2.5 microns | 4 | 0.3 tonnes air release | N/A |
Sulphur dioxide | 4 | 20 tonnes air release | N/A |
Total particulate matter | 4 | 20 tonnes air release | N/A |
Volatile organic compounds | 4 | 10 tonnes air release | N/A |
Notes;
N/A - not available
MPO - Manufactured, processed or otherwise used
In 2015, approximately 6200 facilities reported releases of one or more APEI pollutants to the NPRI.
Using the 2015 NPRI database (version dated September 7, 2016), facility information and air emissions data for the pollutants in Table A2-24 were extracted for each province and territory. The quality control process described in Section 4.1 was applied to the NPRI data to identify outliers or missing substance reports. Each extracted NPRI facility was assigned to an APEI source, sector and subsector.
For new NPRI reporting facilities, the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (Statistics Canada 2012), reported by the facilities, were used to assign the related APEI sector and subsector classifications. In some cases, additional research and verification was required to provide the correct classification for facilities with a number of activities that were different from the NAICS code reported by the facility to the NPRI.
NPRI reporting facilities may not report all three of the PM size fractions. For cases where only one or two of the three PM size fractions were reported to the NPRI, a distribution procedure is applied to estimate a complete set of PM emissions for facilities. The procedure is based on sector-specific PM distribution profiles developed based on PM emissions reported by facilities to the NPRI for the 2006 to 2014 inventory years. The ratios were calculated for each facility and averaged by sector. The resulting distributions are presented in Table A2-25.
The PM distribution procedure described in equations A2-1, A2-2 and A2-3 is applied on a case-by-case basis to fill data gaps.
Equation A2-1: PM10 distribution ratio
PM10ratio = PM10emissions / TPM emissions
Where
- PM10ratio = Ratio of the sector's PM10 emissions to TPM emissions
- PM10emissions = PM10 emissions for the sector
- TPM emissions = TPM emissions for the sector
Equation A2-2: PM2.5 distribution ratio
PM2.5ratio = PM2.5emissions / TPM emissions
Where
- PM2.5ratio = Ratio of the sector's PM2.5 emissions to TPM emissions
- PM2.5 emissions = PM2.5 emissions for the sector
- TPM emissions = TPM emissions for the sector
Equation A2-3: PM2.5/PM10 distribution ratio
PM2.5/PM10ratio = PM2.5emissions / PM10emissions
Where
- PM2.5/PM10ratio = Ratio of the sector's PM2.5 emissions to the PM10 emissions
- PM2.5 emissions = PM2.5 emissions for the sector
- PM10emissions = PM10 emissions for the sector
The TPM, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions calculated using the distribution procedure are added to the list of point source emissions and flagged as an Environment and Climate Change Canada estimate.
Sector | Subsector | PM10 ratio | PM2.5 ratio | PM2.5/PM10 ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aluminium Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Aluminium Industry | Primary Aluminium Smelting and Refining | 0.686 | 0.559 | 0.798 |
Aluminium Industry | Secondary Aluminium (Includes Recycling) | 0.951 | 0.937 | 0.926 |
Asphalt Paving Industry | Empty | 0.385 | 0.177 | 0.513 |
Cement and Concrete Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Cement and Concrete Industry | Cement Manufacture | 0.623 | 0.310 | 0.474 |
Cement and Concrete Industry | Concrete Batching and Products | 0.497 | 0.230 | 0.465 |
Cement and Concrete Industry | Lime Manufacture | 0.576 | 0.309 | 0.512 |
Foundries | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Foundries | Die Casting | 0.711 | 0.510 | 0.810 |
Foundries | Ferrous Foundries | 0.711 | 0.510 | 0.723 |
Foundries | Non-ferrous Foundries | 0.927 | 0.490 | 0.719 |
Iron and Steel Industries | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Iron and Steel Industries | Primary (Blast furnace and DRI) | 0.598 | 0.403 | 0.650 |
Iron and Steel Industries | Secondary (Electric Arc Furnaces) | 0.616 | 0.474 | 0.802 |
Iron and Steel Industries | Steel Recycling | 0.711 | 0.510 | 0.287 |
Iron Ore Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Iron Ore Industry | Iron Ore Mining | 0.513 | 0.191 | 0.432 |
Iron Ore Industry | Pelletizing | 0.480 | 0.212 | 0.410 |
Mineral Products Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Mineral Products Industry | Clay Products | 0.802 | 0.094 | 0.484 |
Mineral Products Industry | Other Mineral Products | 0.762 | 0.545 | 0.665 |
Mining and Rock Quarrying | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Mining and Rock Quarrying | Coal Mining Industry | 0.368 | 0.064 | 0.147 |
Mining and Rock Quarrying | Metal Mining | 0.532 | 0.283 | 0.509 |
Mining and Rock Quarrying | Rock, Sand and Gravel | 0.460 | 0.165 | 0.397 |
Mining and Rock Quarrying | Other Minerals Table A2-25 Note a | 0.465 | 0.197 | 0.398 |
Non-ferrous Smelting and Refining Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Non-ferrous Smelting and Refining Industry | Primary Ni, Cu, Zn, Pb | 0.649 | 0.375 | 0.606 |
Non-ferrous Smelting and Refining Industry | Secondary Pb, Cu | 0.574 | 0.396 | 0.748 |
Non-ferrous Smelting and Refining Industry | Other metals | 0.494 | 0.444 | 0.859 |
Downstream Petroleum Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Downstream Petroleum Industry | Refined Petroleum Products Bulk Storage and Distribution | 0.100 | 0.100 | 0.750 |
Downstream Petroleum Industry | Other Downstream Petroleum Industry | 0.743 | 0.641 | 0.628 |
Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution | Natural Gas Distribution | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution | Natural Gas Transmission | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Petroleum Product Transportation and Distribution | Petroleum Product Pipelines | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Upstream Petroleum Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Upstream Petroleum Industry | Bitumen and Heavy Oil Upgrading | 0.729 | 0.451 | 0.603 |
Upstream Petroleum Industry | Light Medium Crude Oil Production | 0.915 | 0.876 | 0.997 |
Upstream Petroleum Industry | Natural Gas Production and Processing | 0.915 | 0.876 | 0.997 |
Upstream Petroleum Industry | Oil Sands In-Situ Extraction and Processing | 0.995 | 0.994 | 1.000 |
Upstream Petroleum Industry | Oil Sands Mining Extraction and Processing | 0.956 | 0.908 | 0.947 |
Upstream Petroleum Industry | Petroleum Liquids Storage | 0.690 | 0.594 | 0.756 |
Coal | Empty | 0.578 | 0.293 | 0.484 |
Diesel | Empty | 0.735 | 0.608 | 0.924 |
Natural Gas | Empty | 0.909 | 0.663 | 0.902 |
Waste Materials | Empty | 0.734 | 0.540 | 0.760 |
Other Electric Power Generation | Empty | 0.735 | 0.608 | 0.924 |
Abrasives Manufacture | Empty | 0.842 | 0.773 | 0.371 |
Bakeries | Empty | 0.947 | 0.931 | 0.857 |
Chemicals Industry | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Chemicals Industry | Chemical Manufacture | 0.737 | 0.595 | 0.754 |
Chemicals Industry | Fertilizer Production | 0.575 | 0.235 | 0.520 |
Chemicals Industry | Paint and Varnish Manufacturing | 0.919 | 0.564 | 0.701 |
Chemicals Industry | Petrochemical Industry | 0.894 | 0.424 | 0.587 |
Chemicals Industry | Plastics and Synthetic Resins Fabrication | 0.791 | 0.566 | 0.744 |
Chemicals Industry | Other Chemical IndustriesTable A2-25 Note b | Varies | Varies | Varies |
Electronics | Empty | 0.958 | 0.833 | 0.834 |
Food Preparation | Empty | 0.651 | 0.409 | 0.634 |
Glass Manufacture | Empty | 0.836 | 0.755 | 0.919 |
Grain Processing | Empty | 0.387 | 0.140 | 0.338 |
Metal Fabrication | Empty | 0.747 | 0.590 | 0.771 |
Plastics Manufacture | Empty | 0.731 | 0.474 | 0.817 |
Pulp and Paper Industry | Empty | 0.737 | 0.560 | 0.757 |
Textiles | Empty | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.759 |
Vehicle Manufacture (Engines, Parts, Assembly, Painting) | Empty | 0.694 | 0.427 | 0.748 |
Wood Products | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Wood Products | Panel Board Mills | 0.596 | 0.361 | 0.589 |
Wood Products | Sawmills | 0.423 | 0.197 | 0.451 |
Wood Products | Other Wood Products | 0.688 | 0.549 | 0.732 |
Other Manufacturing IndustriesTable A2-25 Note c | Empty | Varies | Varies | Varies |
Animal Production | Empty | 0.280 | 0.058 | 0.208 |
Crop Production | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Crop Production | Fertilizer Application | 0.490 | 0.140 | 0.286 |
Crop Production | Harvesting | 0.455 | 0.091 | 0.200 |
Crop Production | Tillage Practices | 0.210 | 0.100 | 0.476 |
Crop Production | Wind Erosion | 0.500 | 0.100 | 0.200 |
Fuel Use | Empty | 0.646 | 0.503 | 0.749 |
Commercial and Institutional Fuel Combustion | Empty | 0.761 | 0.581 | 0.599 |
Marine Cargo Handling | Empty | 0.396 | 0.147 | 0.365 |
Industrial and Commercial Incineration | Empty | 0.718 | 0.359 | 0.479 |
Municipal Incineration | Empty | 0.737 | 0.680 | 0.913 |
Waste | Empty | Empty | Empty | Empty |
Waste | Landfills | 0.778 | 0.603 | 0.743 |
Waste | Waste Treatment and Disposal | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Waste | Water and Sewage Treatment | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.968 |
Waste | Remediation and Other Waste Management Services | 0.778 | 0.603 | 0.743 |
Dry Cleaning | Empty | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
PrintingTable A2-25 Note d | Empty | Varies | Varies | Varies |
Surface Coatings | Empty | 0.942 | 0.786 | 0.792 |
Unpaved RoadsTable A2-25 Note e | Empty | 0.265 | 0.027 | 0.100 |
Notes:
Based on the year 2006 to 2013 point source emissions for 2006 to 2013 except where indicated otherwise.
- Table A2-25 Note a For the purpose of this table, this category does not include Limestone.
- Table A2-25 Note b Values for PM ratios for these categories vary by subsector: Other Chemical Industries - values range from 0.465 to 0.886.
- Table A2-25 Note c Values for PM ratios for these categories vary by subsector: Other Manufacturing Industries - values range from 0.122 to 0.771.
- Table A2-25 Note d Values for PM ratios for these categories vary by subsector: Printing - values range from 0.786 to 1.0.
- Table A2-25 Note e Ratios derived from particulate matter ratios provided in the NPRI Toolbox guidance document entitled Guidance on Estimating Road Dust Emissions from Industrial Unpaved Surfaces.
A2.5 Reconciliation of point and area source emissions
A reconciliation protocol is in place to prevent the double-counting of emissions when combining the area source and point source data for the purpose of forming the final APEI. Reconciliation is performed separately at the subsector level for each province and territory. Table A2-1 in Section A2.2 provides a complete list of the sectors that required reconciliation.
A2.5.1 General procedures
The approach for reconciling point source and area source emissions from a province, sector and subsector and for a specific pollutant is as follows: The general approach for reconciling point source and area source emissions from a province, sector and subsector and for a specific pollutant is as follows:
- If the total area source emission quantity is greater than or equal to the total point source emission quantity, the reconciled area source estimate is equal to the total area source estimate minus the total point source estimate, as outlined in Equation A2-4.
Equation A2-4:
If, AreaSourceTotal ≥ PointSourceTotal
Then, AreaSourceREC = AreaSourceTotal - PointSourceTotal
- If the total area source emission quantity is less than or equal to the total point source emission quantity, the reconciled area source estimate is equal to zero, as outlined in Equation A2-5.
Equation A2-5:
If, AreaSourceTotal ≤ PointSourceTotal
Then, AreaSourceREC = 0
Some points to consider:
- In general, AreaSourceREC represents non-reporting facilities (including smaller facilities or emissions from reporting facilities that do not meet reporting requirements).
- In cases where AreaSourceREC = 0 (Equation A2-5), point source data are considered to reflect all the sector emitting sources.
For most industrial sectors, the NPRI point source data captures all facilities’ emissions, resulting in area source estimates not being required (i.e. AreaSourceREC = 0). However, certain industrial sectors still have an area source component and require reconciliation.
Reconciliation procedures were performed for sector/subsectors that had both area source and point source emissions (Table A2-1). For example, for 2015, reconciliation was performed for the asphalt paving industry.
A2.5.2 Wood products
Particulate matter emissions (TPM, PM10 and PM2.5) from Sawmills and Panel Board Mills (Wood Products sector) were not reconciled using the procedure described in section A2.5. 1. Rather, NPRI facility-reported data from Sawmills and Panel Board Mills were used to characterize the entire industry. These point source data, together with a number of production indicators, were used to estimate the PM emissions from facilities that are not required to report to the NPRI but that are operational. These estimates were reported as area source emissions. The sum of the resulting area source emissions and NPRI point source emissions represents the total emissions for these subsectors. All other pollutants were reconciled at the subsector and provincial level according to the standard procedure and equations outlined in section A2.5.1.
A2.6 Dry cleaning, general solvent use, printing and surface coatings
The area source emissions in the Dry Cleaning, General Solvent Use, Printing, and Surface Coatings sectors (Paints and Solvents source category) include a total of 92 different kinds of solvents and applications. The challenge is to reconcile the area source estimates with point source emissions reported by facilities, which include a variety of sources (solvent use as well as processes, fuel combustion, road dust, etc.) grouped under the same North American Industry Classification System. Due to this sector’s complexity, reconciliation of area source emissions with the point source emissions from the NPRI requires that several steps be performed by a specially designed database application (Cheminfo 2016):
- Allocating the solvent use area source emissions to the 4-digit NAICS level from the NPRI;
- Allocating the NPRI VOC inventory totals at the 4-digit NAICS level to “Process” and “Solvent” type emissions;
- Subtracting the “Solvent” type NPRI emissions from the area source solvent emissions.
If subtraction of the point source emissions from the area source emissions for a certain solvent use yields a small negative value, the emission estimate for that area source is set to zero. However, if the reconciliation yields a large negative value, examination/verification of both the area and point source estimates and the allocation percentages for that solvent use is performed, and the estimates are adjusted accordingly.
A2.7 Mercury in products
Mercury can be released to air throughout the life cycle of mercury-containing products, including during manufacture, distribution, use, disposal, transportation and final disposition, as well as through waste streams. Releases can also result from breakage and processing. As such, reconciliation of Hg air emissions from mercury in products with NPRI facility-reported data involves a review and characterization of the source of the Hg air emissions included in the facility-reported estimate (primarily in the waste sector, such as the landfill) to ensure that the Hg emissions estimated through the life-cycle approach are not duplicated in the facility-reported data.
A2.8 References
[AER] Alberta Energy Regulator. 2016. AER Compliance Dashboard - Incidents . [cited 2016 Aug 16].
[AAFC] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 2016. Red Meat Market Information, Alternative Livestock, Rabbit industry at a glance.
Battye R, Battye W, Overcash C, Fudge S. 1994. Development and Selection of Ammonia Emission Factors. Durham (NC). Report No. EPA/600/R-94/190.
[BCMELP] British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. 1997. British Columbia Inventory of Common Air Contaminants Emitted in 1995 from Miscellaneous Area Sources Outside of the Lower Fraser Valley. Victoria (BC): BCMELP.
[BCMWLAP] British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection. 2004. 2000 British Columbia Emissions Inventory of Criteria Air Contaminants: Methods and Calculations. Victoria (BC).
[BCOGC] British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission. 2016. Drilling Kicks and Blowouts by Area.
Boadi DA, Ominski KH, Fulawka DL, Wittenberg KM. 2004. Improving Estimates of Methane Emissions Associated with Enteric Fermentation of Cattle in Canada by Adopting an IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Tier-2 Methodology. Winnipeg (MB).
Bouwman AF, Boumans LJM, Batjes NH. 2002. Estimation of global NH3 volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16 (2):8-1-8-14.
Canadian Facts. 1997. Residential Fuelwood Combustion in Canada Volumes I, II, III. Hull (QC): Canadian Facts. Prepared for Environment Canada.
Canadian Facts. 2006. Residential Fuelwood Combustion in Canada. Unpublished report. Hull (QC): Canadian Facts. Prepared for Environment Canada.
[CANA] Cremation Association of North America. 2013. Annual CANA Statistics Report 2012: Executive Summary. (PDF: 563 KB) [accessed 2016 Aug 11].
[CANA] Cremation Association of North America. 2016. Annual CANA Statistics Report (DRAFT). Unpublished report. Received from Barbara Kemmis on July 24, 2016.
[CANMET] Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology. 1993. Present and Future Uses of Energy in the Cement and Concrete Industries in Canada. Unpublished report. Mississauga (ON): Holderback Consulting. Prepared for Energy, Mines and Resources Canada.
[CAPP] Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. 2005. Extrapolation of the 2000 UOG Emission Inventory to 2001, 2002 and 2003. Calgary (AB): Clearstone Engineering Ltd.
[CAPP] Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. 2016. Statistical Handbook for Canada’s Upstream Petroleum Industry. [revised 2016 May; cited 2016 Aug 16].
[CARB] California Air Resources Board. 2003 Emission Inventory Procedural Manual Volume III: Methods for Assessing Area Source Emissions.
[CARB] California Air Resources Board. 2005. California Air Toxics Emission Factor Database [database on the Internet].
[CCME] Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2001. A Study of Fugitive Coal Dust Emissions in Canada. Unpublished report. Prepared for the CCME.
[CEA] Canadian Electricity Association. 2002. Perspectives: Understanding Mercury. 1 (1) (PDF Format 210 KB).
[CGC] Canadian Grain Commission. 2015. Grain Statistics Weekly 2012 - 2014.
Cheminfo Services. 2005. Survey of Small and Medium Commercial Baking Establishments to Estimate Average VOC Emission Factors. Unpublished report. Markham (ON): Cheminfo. Prepared for Environment Canada.
Cheminfo Services. 2007. Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from the Use of Solvents in Canada - Inventory Improvement and Trends Compilation - Task #2: VOC Emission Trends Compilation 1985-2005. Unpublished report. Markham (ON): Cheminfo. Prepared for Environment Canada.
Cheminfo Services. 2016a. Compilation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from the Use of Solvents in Canada: Inventory Update. VOC Emission Trends Compilation: 2005 to 2014. Final Report. Unpublished report. Markham (ON): Cheminfo. Prepared for Environment and Climate Change Canada.
Cheminfo Services. 2016b. User Manual for the Solvent VOC Database Model. Final Report Version 3. Unpublished report. Markham (ON): Cheminfo. Prepared for Environment and Climate Change Canada.
[CIFFC] Canadian Interagency Forest Fires Centre. 2016. Canada Report 2015.
[CNLOPB] Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board. 2016a. Production Summary by Well - Hibernia (PDF Format 311 KB). [cited 2016 Aug 16].
[CNLOPB] Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board. 2016b. Production Summary by Well - Terra Nova (PDF Format 174 KB). [cited 2016 Aug 16].
[CNLOPB] Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board. 2016c. Production Summary by Well - White Rose (PDF Format 135 KB). [cited 2016 Aug 16].
[CNLOPB] Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board. 2016d. Production Summary by Well - North Amethyst (PDF Format 219 KB). [cited 2016 Aug 16].
[CNLOPB] Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board. 2016e. Environment Statistics - Spill Frequency and Volume Annual Summary (PDF Format 70 KB). [cited 2016 Aug 16].
Coe DL, Main HH, Chinkin LR, Loomis C, Wilkinson J. 1996. Review of current methodologies for estimating ammonia emissions-Draft Final Report. Santa Rosa (CA): Sonoma Technology. Report No. STI-95310-1580-DFR. Prepared for California Air Resources Board.
[DAC] DesRosiers Automotive Consultants. 2014. Census of Vehicles in Operation in Canada. Richmond Hill (ON). Prepared for Environment Canada.
Ding YS, Trommel JS, Yan XJ, Ashley D, Watson CH. 2005. Determination of 14 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mainstream smoke from domestic cigarettes. Environmental Science & Technology 39 (2):471-78.
[EC] Environment Canada. 1983. A Nationwide Inventory of Emissions of Air Contaminants (1978). Ottawa (ON): Environment Canada, Environmental Protection Programs Directorate. Report No. EPS 3-EP-83-10.
[EC] Environment Canada. 1992. Canada's greenhouse gas emissions: Estimates for 1990. Ottawa (ON): Environment Canada. Report No. EPS 5/AP/4.
[EC] Environment Canada. 2010. Sulphur in Liquid Fuels (PDF Format 437 KB). Gatineau (QC): Environment Canada, Oil, Gas and Alternative Energy Division.
[EC] Environment Canada. 2011. Canadian Off-road Equipment Population. Unpublished report. Mississauga (ON): Environment Canada. Report No. CA12-00333A. Prepared for Environment Canada.
[EC] Environment Canada. 2013. Sulphur in Liquid Fuels [confidential database]. Gatineau (QC): Environment Canada, Oil, Gas and Alternative Energy Division.
[EC] Environment Canada. 2014. Technical Report on Canada’s Upstream Oil and Gas Industry. Vols. 1 - 4. Prepared for Environment Canada. Calgary (AB): Clearstone Engineering Ltd.
[EC] Environment Canada. 2015a. National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI), 2014 [database on the Internet]. Gatineau (QC): Environment Canada, National Pollutant Release Inventory.
[EC] Environment Canada. 2015b. National Inventory Report 1990-2013: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada. The Canadian Government’s Submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Gatineau (QC).
[EC] Environment Canada. 2015c. Monthly Climate Summaries [database on the Internet]. Environment Canada, National Inquiry Response Team [cited 2015 Aug 14].
[EC] Environment Canada. 2015d. Guide for Reporting to the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) 2014 and 2015. Gatineau (QC).
[ECCC] Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016. Off-road gasoline usage data from 1980 to 2015. Gatineau (QC): Environment and Climate Canada.
E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 2003. Methods for Developing a National Emission Inventory for Commercial Cooking Processes: Technical Memorandum. Unpublished report. Springfield (VA): Pechan. Prepared for the U.S. EPA.
[EIIP] Emission Inventory Improvement Program. 2001. EIIP Technical Report Series Volume 3: Area Sources. Report No. EPA 454/R-97-004.
[EMEP/CORINAIR] European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme/ Core Inventory of Air Emissions. 2002. Emission Inventory Guidebook. 3rd Edition. Copenhagen (DK): UNECE/EMEP Task Force on Emissions Inventories and Projections European Environment Agency [cited 2015 Dec 4]. Report No. 30.
[EMEP/CORINAIR] European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme/ Core Inventory of Air Emissions. 2006. Emission Inventory Guidebook. Version 2.3. Copenhagen (DK): European Environment Agency.
[EMEP/EEA] European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme/European Environment Agency. 2009. EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook: Technical Guidance to Prepare National Emission Inventories. Part B: Sectoral Guidance Chapters. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Technical Report No. 9/2009.
[EMEP/EEA] European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme/European Environment Agency. 2013. EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook 2013. Technical Guidance to Prepare National Emission Inventories. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Technical Report No. 12/2013.
[FOCA] Federal Office of Civil Aviation. 2007. Aircraft Piston Engine Emissions Summary Report. Swiss Confederation. Report No. 0/3/33/33-05-003.022.
Gray N, Boyle P. 2002. Heavy metals range of emissions from 26 selected brands. Ann Oncol (13):19-21.
Gulland J. 2000. Non-Industrial Fuel Combustion Sector: Residential Fuel Wood Combustion. Unpublished report. Gatineau (QC). Prepared for Environment Canada.
[GVRD] Greater Vancouver Regional District, [FVRD] Fraser Valley Regional District. 2003. 2000 Emission Inventory for the Canadian Portion of the Lower Fraser Valley Airshed - Detailed Listing of Results and Methodology. Burnaby (BC): Greater Vancouver Regional District.
Hagstrom M. 2010. TPengs FOI orig comp data 031105 corr 071129 Jason Hickey 13 June 2010. Stockholm (SE). Department of Systems Technology. Swedish Defence Research Agency.
Health Canada. 2015. Supplementary Tables, Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey (CTADS), February - December 2013 [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON) [revised 2015 Feb 3; cited 2015 Jun 3].
Huffman T, Coote DR, Green M. 2012. Twenty-five years of changes in soil cover on Canadian Chernozemic (Mollisol) soils, and the impact on the risk of soil degradation. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 92:471-479.
[ICAO] International Civil Aviation Organization. 2009. ICAO Engine Emissions Databank [database on the Internet].
Johnson ND, Scholtz MT, Cassidy V, Davidson K, Ord D. 1992. MOE Toxic Chemical Emission Inventory for Ontario and Eastern North America (PDF Format 14.3 MB). Mississauga (ON): Ortech International. Report No. P92-T61-5429/OG.
Lemieux PM, Lutes CC, Santoianni DA. 2004. Emissions of organic air toxics from open burning: a comprehensive review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 30 (1):1-32.
Madison. 2014. Madison’s 2013 Online Lumber Directory.
Meil J, Bushi L, Garrahan P, Aston R, Gingras A, Elustondo D. 2009. Status of energy use in the Canadian Wood Products Sector. Ottawa (ON). Report No. M144-214/2009.
[MMIC] Motorcycle & Moped Industry Council. 2013. Motorcycle, Scooter & All-Terrain Vehicle Annual Industry Statistics Report, 2013. Markham (ON): MMIC.
[NFD] National Forestry Database. 2016. Table 6.4 Area of Site Preparation by Ownership, Treatment, and Province/Territory 1990-2015 part A & B.
[NRCan] National Resources Canada. 2014. Minerals and Mining Statistics On-Line - Mineral Production of Canada by Province and Territory. Ottawa (ON): NRCan.
[NRCan] National Resources Canada. 2015. Annual Statistics, Mineral Production of Canada, by Province and Territory. Ottawa (ON): NRCan.
Ott W, Lagan L, Switzert P. 1992. A time series model for cigarette smoking activity patterns: Model validation for carbon monoxide and respirable particles in a chamber and an automobile. J Exp Anal Epid 2:175-200.
Ott W, Switzer P, Robinson J. 1996. Particle concentrations inside a tavern before and after prohibition of smoking: evaluating the performance of an indoor air quality model (PDF Format 2.5 MB). J Air Waste Manag Assoc 46:1120-34.
Pattey E, Qiu Guowang Q. 2012. Trends in Primary Particulate Matter Emissions from Canadian Agriculture. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 62 (7):737-47.
Pattey E, Qiu G, Fiset S, Ho E, MacDonald D, Liang C. 2015 Primary Particulate Matter Emissions and Trends from Canadian Agriculture. Valencia, Spain: 23rd International Conference on Modelling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution.
[PCA] Parks Canada Agency. 2016. Prescribed Fires 1990 to 2015. Parks Canada Agency.
Pinchin Environmental Ltd. 2007. CAC Emissions from the Canadian Grain Handling Industry - 1985-2007. Unpublished report. Mississauga (ON): Health Canada.
Polk & Co. 2013. Trucking Industry Profile Database [unpublished database]. Polk &Co. Prepared for Environment Canada.
[RAC] Railway Association of Canada. 2013. Locomotive Emissions Monitoring Program 2011. Edition.
[RISI] Resource Information Systems Inc. 2013. North American Wood Panels and Engineered Wood Products Capacity Report, 2013.
Roe SM, Spivey MD, Lindquist HC, Thesing KB, Strait RP and E.H Pechan & Associates Inc. 2004. Estimating ammonia emissions from anthropogenic nonagricultural sources-Draft final report (PDF Format 402 KB). Unpublished report. U.S EPA, Emission Inventory Improvement Program.
[SK MOE] Saskatchewan Ministry of Economy. 2016a. 2015 Crude Oil Volume and Value Summary. [revised 2016 Feb 29; cited 2016 Aug 24].
[SK MOE] Saskatchewan Ministry of Economy. 2016b. Petroleum and Natural Gas Spill Report Directory. [revised 2016 Aug 9; cited 2016 Aug 16].
Seedorf J. 2004. An emission inventory of livestock-related bioaerosols for Lower Saxony, Germany. Atmospheric Environment 38:6565-81.
Senes Consultants. 2008. Update of Process Emission Profiles for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Manufacturing Establishments across Canada. Unpublished report. Richmond Hill (ON): Senes Consultants. Prepared for Environment Canada.
Sheppard SC, Bittman S. 2010. Farm survey used to guide estimates of nitrogen intake and ammonia emissions for beef cattle, including early season grazing and piosphere effects. Anim Feed Sci Tech 167:688-698.
Sheppard SC, Bittman S. 2012. Farm practices as they affect NH3 emissions from beef cattle. Can J Anim Sci 92:525-543.
Sheppard SC, Bittman S, Tait J, Sommer SG, Webb J. 2007a. Sensitivity analysis of alternative model structures for an indicator of ammonia emissions from agriculture. Can J Soil Sci 87 (Special Issue):129-139.
Sheppard SC, De Jong R, Sheppard MI, Bittman S, Beaulieu MS. 2007b. Estimation of ammonia emission episodes for a national inventory using a farmer survey and probable number of field working days. Can J Soil Sci 87:301-313.
Sheppard SC, Bittman S, Beaulieu M, Sheppard MI. 2009a. Ecoregion and farm size differences in feed and manure nitrogen management: 1. Survey methods and results for poultry. Can J Anim Sci 89:1-19.
Sheppard SC, Bittman S, Tait J. 2009b. Monthly NH3 emissions from poultry in 12 Ecoregions of Canada. Can J Anim Sci 89:21-35.
Sheppard SC, Bittman S, Swift ML, Tait J. 2010a. Farm practices survey and modelling to estimate monthly NH3 emissions from swine production in 12 Ecoregions of Canada. Can J Anim Sci 90:145-58.
Sheppard SC, Bittman S, Bruulsema TW. 2010b. Monthly ammonia emissions from fertilizers in 12 Canadian Ecoregions. Can J Soil Sci 90:113-127.
Sheppard S, Bittman S, Swift M, Tait J. 2011a. Modelling monthly NH3 emissions from dairy in 12 Ecoregions of Canada. Can J Anim Sci 91:649-61.
Sheppard SC, Bittman S, Swift M, Beaulieu M, Sheppard M. 2011b. Ecoregion and farm size differences in dairy feed and manure nitrogen management: A survey(PDF Format 351 KB). Can J Anim Sci 91:459-473.
SNC-Lavalin Environment. 2012. National Marine Emissions Inventory for Canada, 2010. Unpublished report. Burnaby (BC): SNC-Lavalin. Prepared for Environment Canada.
SNC/GECO Canada Inc., Ontario Research Foundation. 1981. A Nationwide Inventory of Anthropogenic Sources and Emissions of Primary Fine Particulate Matter. Unpublished report. Montreal (QC): SNC/GECO. Prepared for Environment Canada.
Statistics Canada. 1997. Products Shipped by Canadian Manufacturers, 1995. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada. Catalogue No.: 31-211-XPB.
Statistics Canada. 2007. CANSIM Table 379-0019: Gross domestic product (GDP) at basic prices, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), monthly (dollars x 1,000,000). [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada. [revised 2007 Sep 27; accessed 2016 Jun 2].
Statistics Canada. 2010. Spending Patterns in Canada 2009. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada (PDF Format 595 KB). Catalogue No.: 62-202-X.
Statistics Canada. 2012. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) - Canada 2012. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada. Catalogue No.: 12-501-X.
Statistics Canada. 2013. CANSIM Table 405-0001 and Table 405-0004: Road Motor Vehicle, Trailer and Snowmobile Registration (registrations) [database on the internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada.
Statistics Canada. 2015a. Annual Demographics Statistics (PDF Format 1.45 MB). Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 2015. Catalogue no. 91-215-X.
Statistics Canada. 2015b. CANSIM Table 051-001: Estimates of population, by age group and sex for July 1, Canada, provinces and territories, annual (persons unless otherwise noted) [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada [revised 2015 Sep 28; cited 2016 Apr 18].
Statistics Canada. 2015c. RESD (Report on Energy Supply and Demand in Canada) database 1990 to 2014. Statistics Canada.
Statistics Canada. 2015d. CANSIM Table 001-0010: Estimated areas, yield, production and average farm price of principal field crops, in metric units, annual, 1908 to 2014 [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada [cited 2015 Dec 4].
Statistics Canada. 2015e. CANSIM Table 405-0002: Sales of fuel used for road motor vehicles, by province and territory [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada.
Statistics Canada. 2016a. CANSIM Table 304-0014: Manufacturers’ sales, inventories, orders and inventory to sales ratios, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), Canada, monthly (dollars unless otherwise noted) [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada [cited 2016 July 14].
Statistics Canada. 2016b. CANSIM Table 051-0001: Population by year, by province and territory [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada [cited 2016 May 31].
Statistics Canada. 2016c. CANSIM Table 304-0015: Manufacturing sales, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and province, monthly (dollars) [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada [cited 2016 Jul 14].
Statistics Canada. 2016d. CANSIM Table 329-0075: Industrial product price index, by North American Product Classification System (NAPCS), monthly (index, 2010=100) [database on the Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada [cited 2016 Jul 14].
Statistics Canada. 2016e. Table 131-0001 - Historical supply and disposition of natural gas, monthly (cubic metres).
Statistics Canada. 2016f. Table 126-0001 - Historical supply and disposition of crude oil and equivalent, monthly (cubic metres).
Statistics Canada. 2016g. CANSIM Table 003-0004 - Number of hogs on farms at end of semi-annual period (head), CANSIM (database). [accessed 2016 Jul 14].
Statistics Canada. 2016h. CANSIM Table 003-0015 - Supply and disposition of mink and fox on fur farms (head), CANSIM (database). [accessed 2016 Aug 10]. .
Stewart-Brown Associates. 2012. Kilometre Accumulation Rates in British Columbia and Ontario. Abbotsford (BC). Prepared for Environment Canada.
Takai H, Pedersen S, Johnsen JO, Metz JHM, Groot Koerkamp PWG, Uenk GH, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, Short JL, White RP, Hartung J, Seedorf J, Schröder M, Linkert KH, Wathes CM. 1998. Concentrations and emissions of airborne dust in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 70 (1):59-77.
Tecsult Inc. 2006. Study on gasoline vapour recovery in Stage I distribution networks in Canada. Report No. 0514676. Prepared for Environment Canada.
The NPD Group, Inc. 2016. ReCount Database, 1999 to 2014. North York (ON): NPD Group.
TNS Canada. 2012. Residential Fuelwood Combustion in Canada. Unpublished report. Ottawa (ON): TNS Canada. Prepared for Natural Resources Canada.
Tracey K. 2014. Residential Fuelwood Combustion in Canada. Unpublished report. Gatineau (QC): Environment Canada, Pollutant Inventories and Reporting Division.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1985. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. 5th Edition. Research Triangle (NC): Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards [cited 2014 Aug 27].
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1990. Landfill Air Emissions Estimation Model: User's Manual. Washington (DC). Report No. EPA-600/8-90-085a.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources. 4th Edition. Research Triangle Park (NC): Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1995a. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources. 5th Edition. Research Triangle Park (NC): Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1995b. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources. 5th Edition [updates for 2002]. Research Triangle Park (NC): Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources. 5th Edition. Research Triangle Park (NC): Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Draft Dioxin Reassessment.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency 2004a.WebFIRE. Factor Information Retrieval (FIRE) Data System. Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emission Factors.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2004b. Exposure and Human Health Reassessment of 2, 3, 7, 8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD) and Related Compounds. Washington (DC): National Academy of Sciences (External Review Draft). Report No. EPA/600/P-00/001Cb.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2005a. Documentation for Aircraft, Commercial Marine Vessel, Locomotive, and other Nonroad Components of the National Emissions Inventory, Vol 1 - Methodology. Research Triangle Park (NC). Contract No. 68-D-02-063.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2005b. User's Guide for the Final NONROAD2005 Model (PDF Format 2.08 MB). Washington (DC): Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Report No. EPA-420-R-05-013.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources. 5th Edition. Research Triangle Park (NC): Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. SPECIATE 4.2: Speciation Database Development Documentation. Research Triangle Park (NC): Office of Research and Development. Report No. EPA/600-R-09/038.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2010a. PM Augmentation [database on the Internet]. Research Triangle Park (NC): Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2010b. Technical Guidance on the Use of MOVES2010 for Emission Inventory Preparation in State Implementation Plans and Transportation Conformity. Washington (DC): Office of Transportation and Air Quality (PDF Format 282 KB). Report No. EPA-420-B-10-023.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2010c. Documentation for the Commercial Marine Vessel Component of the National Emissions Inventory. (ZIP; 36.6 MB) Morrisville (NC): Eastern Research Group. Prepared for the U.S. EPA. Contract No. EP-D-07-097.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Documentation for Locomotive Component of the National Emissions Inventory Methodology (ZIP; 36.6 KB). Morrisville (NC): Eastern Research Group for Emissions. Prepared for the U.S. EPA. Contract No. EP-D-07-097.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2012a. EPA memorandum - EPA Region 10 HAP and VOC Emission Factors for Lumber Drying, December 2012 (PDF Format 370 KB).
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2012b. User Guide for MOVES2010b. Washington (DC): Office of Transportation and Air Quality (PDF Format 5.39 MB). Report No. EPA-420-B-12-001b.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Calculating Piston-Engine Aircraft Airport Inventories for Lead for the 2011 National Emissions Inventory. Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Report No. EPA-420-B-13-040.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2014a. WebFIRE [database on the Internet]. Durham (NC): Technology Transfer Network Clearinghouse for Inventories & Emissions Factors.
[U.S. EPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2014b. User Guide for MOVES2014. Washington (DC). Report No. EPA-420-B-14-055.
USDA Foreign Agricultural Service 2015. Canada Potatoes and Potato Products Annual 2015. Unpublished report. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN). Report No.: CA15085.
Van Heyst BJ. 2005. Final Report: Evaluation of Emission Factors for the Improvement of the Estimation Methodology for Particulate Matter from Agricultural Poultry Industry. University of Guelph: Report No. K2361-04-0116.
Van Heyst BJ, Roumeliotis TS. 2007. Size fractionated particulate matter emissions from a broiler house in southern Ontario, Canada. Sci Total Environ 383:174-182.
Wallace L, Pellizzari E, Hartwell TD, Perritt R, Ziegenfus R. 1987. Exposures to benzene and other volatile compounds from active and passive smoking. Arch Environ Health 42 (5):272-279.
Wayson RL, Fleming GG, Lovinelli R. 2009. Methodology to estimate particulate matter emissions from certified commercial aircraft engines. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 59 (1):91-100.
Woodruff NP, Siddoway FH. 1965. A Wind Erosion Equation. Soil Science Society Proceedings 29 (5):602-608.
Page details
- Date modified: