5. Transboundary movement control regimes

This part will prescribe the control regime applicable to all transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and hazardous recyclable materials. It is divided into two regimes:

This Part will specify the following:

Most of the above scheme reflects the current EIHWR with some changes to facilitate compliance and improved the operation of the regulations. Unlike the current EIHWR, however, it is proposed that the new regulations describe each step in the process in a sequential manner. This is more consistent with plain language drafting, and should help users better understand all the elements involved.

In order to provide this clear sequence of requirements, the regulations may repeat some of the key provisions in the Act, including the requirement to submit a Notice, the prohibition on movement without a permit, and the prohibition on abandonment of shipments.

In addition, the proposed regime includes the following key changes:

Clarification of who may apply for a permit

As is the case at present, this will include generators, agents acting on behalf of government, site owners/operator removing wastes or recyclable materials from the activities at their facilities, bulkers who process wastes in a way that changes the material's physical or chemical characteristics.

These provisions will be bolstered by the protection provided by the requirements that:

Together, these will ensure that exporters acting as agents for multiple generators either have a facility that can receive returned material or have a contractual arrangement with such a facility.

Use of the OECD Notice form

As modified to include information relevant to other provisions in CEPA (e.g., whether the applicant is subject to a waste reduction plan order under s. 188; whether the material is a track 1 CEPA-toxic substance; and information related to the ESM criteria described in Part 9, below).

The introduction of a relatively simple renewal mechanism, for repetitive notification. Discussions will be held with the provinces to determine whether such renewals can be processed more rapidly than new notices.

Clarification of the obligations arising upon non-completion

Including the obligation for the Canadian exporter/importer to have a contractual arrangement with the foreign exporter/importer concerning obligations upon non-completion.

The new provisions concerning the responsibility of the carrier to ensure that they are listed on the notice and permit. Experience has shown that subcontracted carriers are sometimes used. Although it is the Canadian importers/exporters responsibility to only use authorized carriers, some onus will be put on the carrier to remain authorized and ensure they are on the permit.

A direct requirement on the carrier to be authorized, in default of which it is in breach of the regulations.

Reduced documentation requirements at the border. The proposed new provisions require only the manifest and the permit be carried to ensure compliance with these regulations.

Clarification of the obligations for rail and ship carriers. These proposed requirements reflect the recent agreement between the railway carriers and the Transboundary Movement Branch that will allow industry to import from the United States and remain in compliance with both the TDGR and EIHWR when the shipment involves movement by rail.

Expanded new authority for e-filing.

These provisions apply to material that is classified as hazardous recyclable material and whose final destination is recycling in an OECD country.

The same provisions as under 5.2, above, will be repeated here, with the following main differences:

The objective of this regime is to provide a flexible regime for hazardous recyclable materials while retaining the core elements required to manage risks effectively and to comply with international obligations. The various provisions described above each represent changes to the basic regime for hazardous wastes. The proposed control regime reflects the provisions concerning hazardous recyclable materials in OECD Decision C(92)39 and the Canada-USA Agreement.

A brief rationale for each of the main changes follows:

Page details

Date modified: