Appendices of the Final Screening Assessment Petroleum Sector Stream Approach Gas Oils [Industry-Restricted] Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers 64741-59-9 64741-82-8 Environment Canada Health Canada July 2013
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
Archived
Appendices
Appendix 6: Modelling results for human exposure to industry-restricted gas oils
Variables Source type |
Input Area |
---|---|
Effective emission area[a] | 50 m × 10 m (for ships) |
Emission rate | 7.4×10-5 g/s·m2 [b] |
Receptor height[c] | 1.74 m |
Source release height[a] | 3 m |
Adjustment factor for highest 1 h to 24 h wind averaging[d] | 0.4 |
Urban/rural option | Urban |
---|---|
Meteorology[e] | 1 (full meteorology) |
Minimum and maximum distance to use | 50–3000 m |
[a] Professional judgement.
[b] Emission rate (g/s) is available in Table A6.2.
[c] Curry et al. (1993).
[d] U.S. EPA (1992).
[e] Default value in SCREEN3 (1996).
Table A6.2. Estimated regular evaporative emissions of gas oil to air in transit in Canada, 2004–2005
Estimated regular evaporative emissions to air | ||
---|---|---|
kg/year | kg/day[a] | g/s |
1100 | 3.2 | 3.7×10-2 |
[a] The Risk Management Research Institute (RMRI 2007) summarized the industry-related shipping traffic in Placentia Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, during 2004–2005, showing approximately 3900 transits per year from tankers, bulk cargo, tugboat or other means. For the Come By Chance refinery only, more than approximately 230 tanker transits per year are related to shipping petroleum substances. Thus, it is reasonable to assume an average transportation period of 350 days/year for marine transportation.
Table A6.3. Modelling results of industry-restricted gas oil dispersion profile in ambient air with 24-hour averaging of wind direction in Canada using SCREEN3
Maximum concentration with 24-hour wind averaging (µg/m3)[a] | |||
---|---|---|---|
50 m | 1000 m | 2000 m | 3000 m |
150 | 1.0 | 0.36 | 0.21 |
[a] These estimations are conservative, as they are based on release from a stationary source. The actual concentration in ambient air in the vicinity of the moving release source, for any given location, will be considerably lower than that represented by the modelling results based on a stationary release source.
Appendix 7: Summary of health effects information for the industry-restricted gas oils
Endpoints | CAS RNs[a] | Effect levels[b]/results |
---|---|---|
Acute health effects | 64741-59-9 | Lowest oral LD50 (female rat): 3200 mg/kg-bw for sample API 83-07 (API 1982, 1985a). Lowest inhalation LC50 (male rat): 3350 mg/m3 for sample API 83-07 (API 1986a). Lowest dermal LD50 (rabbit): greater than 2000 mg/kg-bw for samples API 83-07 and API 83-08 (API 1982, 1985a,b). |
Acute health effects | 64741-82-8 | No studies identified. |
Short-term repeated-exposure health effects | 64741-59-9 | Lowest dermal LOAEL: 50 mg/kg-bw per day was identified based on decreased maternal rat body weight gain and body weight (likely due to reduced feed consumption), as well as skin irritation. Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 0, 25, 50, 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg-bw per day of Mobil LCO on GDs 0–19 and to 1000 mg/kg-bw per day on GDs 6–15. Increased cholesterol and triglycerides were observed at doses greater than or equal to 250 mg/kg-bw per day, and severe sensory irritation was noted at doses greater than or equal to 500 mg/kg-bw per day (Mobil 1988a). Other dermal studies: |
Short-term repeated-exposure health effects | 64741-82-8 | Dermal study: Doses of 15, 60, 250 or 500 mg/kg-bw per day were applied to the shaved dorsal skin of pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals per dose) from GD 0–19. Decreased maternal body weight and feed consumption were observed at 250 and 500 mg/kg-bw per day. Moderate to severe skin irritation, erythema, flaking, scabbing and thickening of the skin were noted to occur at an unspecified dose (Mobil 1988b). |
Short-term repeated-exposure health effects | 64742-80-9 (hydrodesulfurized middle distillates) | Lowest inhalation LOAEC: 25 mg/m3 was identified based on microscopic changes in nasal tissue and subacute inflammation of the respiratory mucosa in rats. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (20 animals of each sex) were exposed to test substances API 81-09 and API 81-10 at a single concentration of 25 mg/m3 for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. An approximate 30% increase in leukocytes was also noted, but no macroscopic changes were observed at necropsy; may be stress related. Test substance was atomized into an atomization chamber, then diluted with chamber air to achieve the desired concentration (API 1986c). |
Subchronic repeated-exposure health effects | 64741-59-9 | Dermal NOAEL: 25 mg/kg-bw per day. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to Mobil LCO at 0, 8, 25, 125, 500 or 1250 mg/kg-bw per day, 5 times per week for 13 weeks (the highest dose was applied for only 2 weeks). Test substance was applied unoccluded to the clipped back skin of 10 animals of each sex per group. Dose-dependent, slightly reduced thymus weights (likely due to lymphocyte depletion) were observed at 125 mg/kg-bw per day. Severe erythema and edema with visibly thick, stiffened skin were observed in the 500 mg/kg-bw per day group; histological examination confirmed moderate chronic inflammatory changes in the skin and hair follicles. Systemic toxicity was noted at 500 and 1250 mg/kg-bw per day (Mobil 1985). Other dermal study: In a similar study, a statistically significant increase in relative liver weights occurred in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (TAC:N(SD)fBR MPF) dermally exposed to LCO at 500 mg/kg-bw per day for 13 weeks (Feuston et al. 1994). Liver weights of animals exposed to 1250 mg/kg-bw per day were not reported. |
Subchronic repeated-exposure health effects | 64741-82-8 | Lowest dermal LOAEL: 30 mg/kg-bw per day was identified based on increased lymphocytes in female rats and a 10% decrease in thymus weight in male rats. Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals of each sex per group) were exposed 5 days/week for 13 weeks to 30, 125, 500 or 2000 mg/kg-bw via application of the substance to shaved skin. At doses greater than or equal to 125 mg/kg-bw, changes in megakaryocytes, increased lymphocytes and decreased body weight in male rats were observed. Additional effects were observed at doses greater than or equal to 500 mg/kg-bw, including severe skin irritation and decreased body weight in females. Daily exposure to the highest dose, 2000 mg/kg-bw, resulted in increased leukocytes and segmented neutrophils, as well as a reduction in erythropoietic cells and megakaryocytes. Basophilia in the renal tubular cortex was also observed in male rats (Mobil 1991). Other dermal study: Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 30, 125, 500 or 2000 mg/kg-bw per day of test substance 5 days/week for 13 weeks. Increased relative liver weights in male and female rats were noted at 125 mg/kg-bw per day. Other possible effects, noted at unspecified doses, included decreased body and thymus weights, skin irritation and altered serum chemistry and hematology. However, the study examined several different substances, and the authors did not explicitly state whether any or all of the latter aforementioned effects were due to CAS RN 64741-82-8 (Feuston et al. 1994). |
Subchronic repeated-exposure health effects | 68334-30-5 (diesel fuel) | Lowest inhalation LOAEC: 250mg/m3 was identified based on decreased body weight and increased response time in an acoustic startle reflex assay (no histological changes in the nervous system were noted, however) in rats. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (24 animals of each sex per concentration) were exposed to diesel fuel at 250, 750 or 1500 mg/m3 for 4 hours/day, 2 days/week, for 13 weeks. The effects noted at 250 mg/m3 were also observed at the higher concentrations. Increased relative right lung lobe weight was observed following exposure to 1500 mg/m3, but no histopathological changes or effects on pulmonary function were noted. Decreased blood cholesterol in females was also noted at this concentration, but was not considered to be treatment related. Test substance was flash vaporized using a Vycor heater attached to the end of a stainless steel tube. The aerosol was subsequently carried into the exposure chamber and diluted with chamber air to achieve the desired concentrations (Lock et al. 1984). |
Carcinogenicity | 64741-59-9 | Chronic dermal studies Other chronic dermal studies: Application twice weekly of 50 µL (1203 mg/kg-bw per application[c] [d] [e]) LCCD to the shaved intrascapular region of the backs of 50 C3H/HeJ male mice for 104 weeks resulted in the formation of squamous cell carcinomas (54% of test mice) and papillomas (14% of test mice), as well as fibrosarcomas (24% of test mice) (39/50 test mice developed skin tumours, mean latency of onset = 40 weeks) (Skisak et al. 1994). Initiation/promotion dermal studies Other dermal studies with similar results have been described in API (1989b). No oral or inhalation studies were identified. |
Carcinogenicity | 64741-82-8 (64741-54-4, 64741-83-9 and 64741-81-7 were also part of the test substance) |
Test substance was a blend of the CAS RNs listed. Two different formulations (ARCO Base LB-7979 and Provalent 4A) were used. Chronic dermal studies: Provalent 4A was tested as above. After 17 weeks of observation, 16/50 exposed mice developed benign skin tumours, with a mean latency period of 15.8 weeks (3/50 mice of the positive control group had tumours after 10 weeks). Following 37 weeks of observation, 47/50 exposed mice had tumours, and 41 with tumours were moribund (mean latency period of 20.7 weeks) (27/50 mice in the positive control group had tumours after 27.8 weeks, and 9 with tumours were moribund). After 80 weeks of observation, 46/47 exposed mice had skin tumours (42 malignant, 4 benign) (47/49 in positive control, with 32 malignancies) (ARCO 1980a,b, 1981). |
Reproductive and developmental health effects | 64741-59-9 | Dermal reproductive LOAEL: 1000 mg/kg-bw per day was identified based on a statistically significant increased incidence of resorptions after dermal application of 0, 25, 50, 125, 250 or 500 mg/kg-bw per day of Mobil LCO to 11-week-old pregnant CD rats (VAF/Plus Crl:CD(SD)BR) on GDs 0–19 and of 1000 mg/kg-bw per day on GDs 6–15 (Feuston et al. 1994). Dermal developmental LOAEL: 1000 mg/kg-bw per day was identified based on statistically significant decreased fetal body weights after dermal application of 0, 25, 50, 125, 250 or 500 mg/kg-bw per day of Mobil LCO to the shorn dorsal skin of pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats on GDs 0–19 and of 1000 mg/kg-bw per day on GDs 0–6 and 6–15. Fetal body weights were decreased at 500 mg/kg-bw per day, but this was not statistically significant. No developmental malformations or reproductive effects were noted (Mobil 1988a). |
Reproductive and developmental health effects | 64741-82-8 | Dermal studies: Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 15 or 60 mg/kg-bw per day of test substance from GD 0–19 or to 250 mg/kg-bw per day from GD 0–15. No increased incidence of resorptions was observed (Feuston et al. 1994). Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals of each sex per dose) were exposed to test substance at 30, 125, 500 or 2000 mg/kg-bw per day, 5 days/week for 13 weeks. No effects were observed on spermatid and spermatozoa counts or morphology of testes and epididymides. Effects in females were not reported (Mobil 1991). |
Reproductive and developmental health effects | 68334-30-5 | Inhalation NOAEC: 3777 mg/m3 for developmental toxicity. A concentration of 3777 mg/m3 (401.5 ppm[h] [i]) of diesel fuelwas administered to pregnant rats from GD 6–15. No developmental effects were noted (Beliles and Mecler 1983). |
Reproductive and developmental health effects | 68476-34-6 | Highest dermal NOAEL: 4050 mg/kg-bw per day for reproductive toxicity. Doses of 405, 1620 or 4050 mg/kg-bw per day (0.5, 2 or 5 mL/kg per day[j] [k]) of diesel fuel No. 2were applied to Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals of each sex per dose), 5 days/week for 4 weeks. No effects on testes or ovaries were observed (UBTL 1986). |
Genotoxicity: in vivo |
64741-59-9 | Cytogenetic assay Sister chromatid exchange assay |
Genotoxicity: in vivo |
64741-82-8 | No studies identified. |
Genotoxicity: in vivo |
68476-34-6 | Cytogenetic assay Positive: Groups of male rats (five animals per dose) were exposed by intraperitoneal injection to 486, 1620 or 4860 mg/kg-bw (0.6, 2.0 or 6.0 ml/kg-bw[j] [k]) of No. 2-DAfor up to 48 h or for 5 days. An increased percentage of aberrations was observed in bone marrow of rats exposed to 2.0 and 6.0 ml/kg-bw (API 1978). |
Genotoxicity: in vivo |
68476-30-2 | Cytogenetic assay Positive: Groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were orally administered 125, 417 or 1250 mg/kg-bw per day for 5 days. Increases in cells with chromatid breaks and in aberrant cells in the bone marrow were observed (Conaway et al. 1984). |
Genotoxicity: in vivo |
68334-30-5 | Cytogenetic assay Positive: Groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed by intraperitoneal injection to diesel fuelat concentrations of 493, 1644 or 4933 mg/kg-bw (0.6, 2.0 or 6.0 ml/kg-bw[j] [l]) for 1 or 5 days. Increased number of aberrant cells reported in bone marrow at the highest dose level (Conaway et al. 1984). |
Genotoxicity: in vivo |
68476-30-2 64742-46-7 64742-30-9 |
Micronuclei induction Negative: Groups of CD-1 mice (15 of each sex per dose) were exposed once via oral gavage to 0, 1000, 2500 or 5000 mg/kg-bw. No increase in frequency of micronuclei induction in bone marrow cells was observed (McKee et al. 1994). |
Genotoxicity: in vitro | 64741-59-9 | Mutagenicity Mouse lymphoma assay Sister chromatid exchange assay |
Genotoxicity: in vitro | 64741-82-8 | Mutagenicity Positive: Test substance was positive when tested at concentrations of 0.26–42 mg/plate, with and without S9 metabolic activation, in S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 (Conaway et al. 1984). |
Human studies | Case report: diesel oil |
Diesel oil used over several weeks as an arm and hand cleaner resulted in epigastric and loin pains, nausea, anorexia, degeneration of kidney tubular epithelium and renal failure. The patient subsequently made a good recovery. There was no history of exposure to any other nephrotoxin (Crisp et al. 1979). |
Human studies | Case–control study: diesel fuel | A case–control study of various cancers revealed an adjusted odds ratio of 1.9 (90% confidence interval 1.2–3.0) for prostate cancer in men exposed to diesel fuel. There was no evidence for a positive dose–response relationship (Siemiatycki et al. 1987). |
Abbreviations: CLGO, coker light gas oil; GD, gestation day; LCCD, light catalytic cracked distillate; LCO, light cycle oil; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
[a] Different samples of CAS RN 64741-59-9 are referred to as API 83-07, API 83-08, LCCD, Mobil LCO and MD-7 LCO. CAS RN 64741-82-8 is referred to as Mobil CLGO, DGMK No. 8 and light thermal cracked distillate.
[b] LC50, median lethal concentration; LD50, median lethal dose; LOAEC, lowest-observed-adverse-effect concentration; LOAEL, lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; NOAEC, no-observed-adverse-effect concentration; NOAEL, no-observed-adverse-effect level.
[c] Body weight not provided; thus, laboratory standards from Salem and Katz (2006) were used.
[d] The following formula was used for conversion of provided values into mg/kg-bw: (% of dilution × x mL × ρ)/kg-bw.
[e] Density (ρ) not provided; thus, a density value from ECB (2000) was used.
[f] A volume/volume dilution was assumed.
[g] The following formula was used for conversion of provided value into mg/kg-bw: x mg/kg-bw.
[h] The following formula was used for conversion of provided values into mg/m3: [x in parts per million (ppm) × molecular mass (MM)]/24.45.
[i] MM of diesel fuel estimated to be 230 g/mol (www.epa.gov/athens/learn2model/part-two/onsite/es.html).
[j] The following formula was used for conversion of provided values into mg/kg-bw: x ml/kg-bw × ρ.
[k] Density (ρ) not provided; thus, a density from Khan et al. (2001) was used.
[l] Density (ρ) not provided; thus, a density from API (2003b) was used.
Page details
- Date modified: