Appendices of the Final Screening Assessment Petroleum Sector Stream Approach Gas Oils [Industry-Restricted] Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers 64741-59-9 64741-82-8 Environment Canada Health Canada July 2013

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Appendices

Appendix 6: Modelling results for human exposure to industry-restricted gas oils

Table A6.1.a Variable inputs to SCREEN3
Variables
Source type
Input
Area
Effective emission area[a] 50 m × 10 m (for ships)
Emission rate 7.4×10-5 g/s·m2 [b]
Receptor height[c] 1.74 m
Source release height[a] 3 m
Adjustment factor for highest 1 h to 24 h wind averaging[d] 0.4
Table A6.1.b Variable inputs to SCREEN3
Urban/rural option Urban
Meteorology[e] 1 (full meteorology)
Minimum and maximum distance to use 50–3000 m

[a] Professional judgement.

[b] Emission rate (g/s) is available in Table A6.2.

[c] Curry et al. (1993).

[d] U.S. EPA (1992).

[e] Default value in SCREEN3 (1996).

Table A6.2. Estimated regular evaporative emissions of gas oil to air in transit in Canada, 2004–2005

Industry-restricted gas oil
Estimated regular evaporative emissions to air
kg/year kg/day[a] g/s
1100 3.2 3.7×10-2

[a] The Risk Management Research Institute (RMRI 2007) summarized the industry-related shipping traffic in Placentia Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, during 2004–2005, showing approximately 3900 transits per year from tankers, bulk cargo, tugboat or other means. For the Come By Chance refinery only, more than approximately 230 tanker transits per year are related to shipping petroleum substances. Thus, it is reasonable to assume an average transportation period of 350 days/year for marine transportation.

Table A6.3. Modelling results of industry-restricted gas oil dispersion profile in ambient air with 24-hour averaging of wind direction in Canada using SCREEN3

Industry-restricted gas oil
Maximum concentration with 24-hour wind averaging (µg/m3)[a]
50 m 1000 m 2000 m 3000 m
150 1.0 0.36 0.21

[a] These estimations are conservative, as they are based on release from a stationary source. The actual concentration in ambient air in the vicinity of the moving release source, for any given location, will be considerably lower than that represented by the modelling results based on a stationary release source.

Top of Page

Appendix 7: Summary of health effects information for the industry-restricted gas oils

Table A7.1. Critical health effects information on gas oil substances
Endpoints CAS RNs[a] Effect levels[b]/results
Acute health effects 64741-59-9 Lowest oral LD50 (female rat): 3200 mg/kg-bw for sample API 83-07 (API 1982, 1985a).
Lowest inhalation LC50 (male rat): 3350 mg/m3 for sample API 83-07 (API 1986a).
Lowest dermal LD50 (rabbit): greater than 2000 mg/kg-bw for samples API 83-07 and API 83-08 (API 1982, 1985a,b).
Acute health effects 64741-82-8 No studies identified.
Short-term repeated-exposure health effects 64741-59-9

Lowest dermal LOAEL: 50 mg/kg-bw per day was identified based on decreased maternal rat body weight gain and body weight (likely due to reduced feed consumption), as well as skin irritation. Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 0, 25, 50, 125, 250 and 500 mg/kg-bw per day of Mobil LCO on GDs 0–19 and to 1000 mg/kg-bw per day on GDs 6–15. Increased cholesterol and triglycerides were observed at doses greater than or equal to  250 mg/kg-bw per day, and severe sensory irritation was noted at doses greater than or equal to  500 mg/kg-bw per day (Mobil 1988a).

Other dermal studies:
API 83-07 (0, 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg-bw per day) and API 83-08 (0, 200, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg-bw per day) were applied to the clipped dorsal skin of New Zealand White rabbits (five of each sex per group) 3 times per week for 4 weeks. Dose-dependent skin irritation was observed, from no irritation in the control groups to moderate and severe irritation in the test groups. Histological examination revealed moderate to severe proliferation and inflammation in the high-dose groups. Other findings were not considered treatment related and included decreased body weight gain and body weight, reduced ovary weight, hypoplasia of the seminiferous tubules and mortality (API 1985c,d).

Short-term repeated-exposure health effects 64741-82-8 Dermal study: Doses of 15, 60, 250 or 500 mg/kg-bw per day were applied to the shaved dorsal skin of pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals per dose) from GD 0–19. Decreased maternal body weight and feed consumption were observed at 250 and 500 mg/kg-bw per day. Moderate to severe skin irritation, erythema, flaking, scabbing and thickening of the skin were noted to occur at an unspecified dose (Mobil 1988b).
Short-term repeated-exposure health effects 64742-80-9 (hydrodesulfurized middle distillates) Lowest inhalation LOAEC: 25 mg/m3 was identified based on microscopic changes in nasal tissue and subacute inflammation of the respiratory mucosa in rats. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (20 animals of each sex) were exposed to test substances API 81-09 and API 81-10 at a single concentration of 25 mg/m3 for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. An approximate 30% increase in leukocytes was also noted, but no macroscopic changes were observed at necropsy; may be stress related. Test substance was atomized into an atomization chamber, then diluted with chamber air to achieve the desired concentration (API 1986c).
Subchronic repeated-exposure health effects 64741-59-9

Dermal NOAEL: 25 mg/kg-bw per day. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to Mobil LCO at 0, 8, 25, 125, 500 or 1250 mg/kg-bw per day, 5 times per week for 13 weeks (the highest dose was applied for only 2 weeks). Test substance was applied unoccluded to the clipped back skin of 10 animals of each sex per group. Dose-dependent, slightly reduced thymus weights (likely due to lymphocyte depletion) were observed at 125 mg/kg-bw per day. Severe erythema and edema with visibly thick, stiffened skin were observed in the 500 mg/kg-bw per day group; histological examination confirmed moderate chronic inflammatory changes in the skin and hair follicles. Systemic toxicity was noted at 500 and 1250 mg/kg-bw per day (Mobil 1985).

Other dermal study: In a similar study, a statistically significant increase in relative liver weights occurred in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (TAC:N(SD)fBR MPF) dermally exposed to LCO at 500 mg/kg-bw per day for 13 weeks (Feuston et al. 1994). Liver weights of animals exposed to 1250 mg/kg-bw per day were not reported.

Subchronic repeated-exposure health effects 64741-82-8

Lowest dermal LOAEL: 30 mg/kg-bw per day was identified based on increased lymphocytes in female rats and a 10% decrease in thymus weight in male rats. Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals of each sex per group) were exposed 5 days/week for 13 weeks to 30, 125, 500 or 2000 mg/kg-bw via application of the substance to shaved skin. At doses greater than or equal to  125 mg/kg-bw, changes in megakaryocytes, increased lymphocytes and decreased body weight in male rats were observed. Additional effects were observed at doses greater than or equal to  500 mg/kg-bw, including severe skin irritation and decreased body weight in females. Daily exposure to the highest dose, 2000 mg/kg-bw, resulted in increased leukocytes and segmented neutrophils, as well as a reduction in erythropoietic cells and megakaryocytes. Basophilia in the renal tubular cortex was also observed in male rats (Mobil 1991).

Other dermal study: Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 30, 125, 500 or 2000 mg/kg-bw per day of test substance 5 days/week for 13 weeks. Increased relative liver weights in male and female rats were noted at 125 mg/kg-bw per day. Other possible effects, noted at unspecified doses, included decreased body and thymus weights, skin irritation and altered serum chemistry and hematology. However, the study examined several different substances, and the authors did not explicitly state whether any or all of the latter aforementioned effects were due to CAS RN 64741-82-8 (Feuston et al. 1994).

Subchronic repeated-exposure health effects 68334-30-5 (diesel fuel) Lowest inhalation LOAEC: 250mg/m3 was identified based on decreased body weight and increased response time in an acoustic startle reflex assay (no histological changes in the nervous system were noted, however) in rats. Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (24 animals of each sex per concentration) were exposed to diesel fuel at 250, 750 or 1500 mg/m3 for 4 hours/day, 2 days/week, for 13 weeks. The effects noted at 250 mg/m3 were also observed at the higher concentrations. Increased relative right lung lobe weight was observed following exposure to 1500 mg/m3, but no histopathological changes or effects on pulmonary function were noted. Decreased blood cholesterol in females was also noted at this concentration, but was not considered to be treatment related. Test substance was flash vaporized using a Vycor heater attached to the end of a stainless steel tube. The aerosol was subsequently carried into the exposure chamber and diluted with chamber air to achieve the desired concentrations (Lock et al. 1984).
Carcinogenicity 64741-59-9

Chronic dermal studies
Lowest dermal effect level:
343 mg/kg-bw per day. A statistically significant (p less than 0.05) increase in the number of mice with squamous cell carcinomas or papillomas occurred after long-term dermal exposure to 343 mg/kg-bw per day of MD-7 LCO. Groups of male mice (C3H/HeNCrlBR; 50 per group) were exposed daily for 104 weeks to 35 µL of highly refined mineral oil (negative control), 50 µL of 5% heavy clarified oil (positive control), 28.5% MD-7 LCO (7 times per week = 343 mg/kg-bw per day[c] [d] [e] [f]), 50% MD-7 LCO (4 times per week = 601 mg/kg-bw per application[c] [d] [e] [f]) or 100% MD-7 LCO (2 times per week = 1203 mg/kg-bw per application[c] [d] [e]). Of mice exposed to 28.5% (343 mg/kg-bw) MD-7 LCO, 7/50 developed skin tumours (compared with 0/50 in the negative control and 47/50 in the positive control), with the first tumour visible by day 301. Mice exposed to 50% (601 mg/kg-bw) MD-7 LCO also developed skin tumours (17/50, p less than 0.01), and these were confirmed histologically (the first tumour was visible by day 266). In addition to the 17 mice with confirmed tumours in this group, other mice had unconfirmed tumours (1/50) or developed only fibrosarcomas (4/50) or melanomas (1/50). An insignificant increase in skin tumours occurred in the group exposed to 100% (1203 mg/kg-bw) MD-7 LCO (1/50, tumour visible by day 651). The lack of tumours in this group was thought to be due to substantial cellular necrosis of skin cells due to the high concentration of the substance (Nessel et al. 1998).

Other chronic dermal studies:
Application twice weekly of 50 µL (1203 mg/kg-bw per application[c] [d] [e]) LCCD to the shaved interscapular region of the backs of 50 C3H/HeJ male mice for 104 weeks resulted in a statistically significant (p less than 0.05) increased incidence of skin tumours, with 63% of mice developing at least one skin tumour (mean latency of onset = 79 weeks). Squamous cell carcinomas (13/50) and fibrosarcomas (12/50) were predominantly formed (compared with a zero tumour incidence in controls). An ~50% reduction in survival (relative to the control group) at 78 weeks was noted for mice exposed to LCCD, and only 6% survived to 104 weeks (compared with 52% of control mice) (Broddle et al. 1996).

Application twice weekly of 50 µL (1203 mg/kg-bw per application[c] [d] [e]) LCCD to the shaved intrascapular region of the backs of 50 C3H/HeJ male mice for 104 weeks resulted in the formation of squamous cell carcinomas (54% of test mice) and papillomas (14% of test mice), as well as fibrosarcomas (24% of test mice) (39/50 test mice developed skin tumours, mean latency of onset = 40 weeks) (Skisak et al. 1994).

Initiation/promotion dermal studies
Initiation: 30 male CD-1 mice received five consecutive daily applications of 50 µL (1203 mg/kg-bw[c] [d] [e]) LCCD and then 50 µL of tumour promoter (phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate) twice weekly for 25 weeks. Squamous cell papillomas and keratoacanthomas developed in 9/30 mice, but this was not considered statistically significant (3/30 tumours in the negative versus 30/30 in the positive control groups).
Promotion: 30 mice were initiated with 50 µL 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene and then received 50 µL (1203 mg/kg-bw[c] [d] [e]) LCCD twice weekly for 25 weeks. Mice treated with LCCD exhibited a statistically significant increased incidence of skin tumours (28/30 versus zero incidence in the negative control group), with a 90% incidence of squamous cell papillomas and a 33% incidence of keratoacanthomas. Two malignant tumours were noted in the LCCD-exposed group (Skisak et al. 1994).

Other dermal studies with similar results have been described in API (1989b).

No oral or inhalation studies were identified.

Carcinogenicity 64741-82-8
(64741-54-4,
64741-83-9 and
64741-81-7 were also part of the test substance)

Test substance was a blend of the CAS RNs listed. Two different formulations (ARCO Base LB-7979 and Provalent 4A) were used.

Chronic dermal studies:
C3H/HeJ mice (50 animals per group) were exposed to 50 mg (1389 mg/kg-bw[c] [g]) ARCO LB-7979 twice per week for 80 weeks. Substance was applied to shaved interscapular skin. Benign skin tumours developed in 2/50 exposed mice after 17 weeks of observation, with a mean latency period of 14 weeks (the positive control group, exposed to benzo[a]pyrene, developed 3/50 tumours after 10 weeks). Following 37 weeks of observation, 47/50 mice in the test group had skin tumours (and of the mice with tumours, 29 were moribund), with a mean latency period of 24.5 weeks (28/50 mice in the positive control group had tumours, and 9 of the 28 were moribund after 27.8 weeks). After 80 weeks of observation, 46/47 mice in the test group had skin tumours (39 malignant, 7 benign) (in the positive control group, 47/49 mice had tumours, with 32 malignancies) (ARCO 1980a,b, 1981).

Provalent 4A was tested as above. After 17 weeks of observation, 16/50 exposed mice developed benign skin tumours, with a mean latency period of 15.8 weeks (3/50 mice of the positive control group had tumours after 10 weeks). Following 37 weeks of observation, 47/50 exposed mice had tumours, and 41 with tumours were moribund (mean latency period of 20.7 weeks) (27/50 mice in the positive control group had tumours after 27.8 weeks, and 9 with tumours were moribund). After 80 weeks of observation, 46/47 exposed mice had skin tumours (42 malignant, 4 benign) (47/49 in positive control, with 32 malignancies) (ARCO 1980a,b, 1981).

Reproductive and developmental health effects 64741-59-9

Dermal reproductive LOAEL: 1000 mg/kg-bw per day was identified based on a statistically significant increased incidence of resorptions after dermal application of 0, 25, 50, 125, 250 or 500 mg/kg-bw per day of Mobil LCO to 11-week-old pregnant CD rats (VAF/Plus Crl:CD(SD)BR) on GDs 0–19 and of 1000 mg/kg-bw per day on GDs 6–15 (Feuston et al. 1994).

Dermal developmental LOAEL: 1000 mg/kg-bw per day was identified based on statistically significant decreased fetal body weights after dermal application of 0, 25, 50, 125, 250 or 500 mg/kg-bw per day of Mobil LCO to the shorn dorsal skin of pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats on GDs 0–19 and of 1000 mg/kg-bw per day on GDs 0–6 and 6–15. Fetal body weights were decreased at 500 mg/kg-bw per day, but this was not statistically significant. No developmental malformations or reproductive effects were noted (Mobil 1988a).

Reproductive and developmental health effects 64741-82-8

Dermal studies:
Doses of 15, 60, 250 or 500 mg/kg-bw were applied to the shaved dorsal skin of pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals per group) from GD 0–19. No differences were observed in the number of females who aborted, dams with viable fetuses, dams with resorptions, corpora lutea, implantation sites, percent preimplantation loss, viable fetuses or resorptions. No differences were observed in litter sizes, viable male/female fetuses, dead fetuses, fetal body weight or fetal crown-to-rump length (Mobil 1988b).

Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 15 or 60 mg/kg-bw per day of test substance from GD 0–19 or to 250 mg/kg-bw per day from GD 0–15. No increased incidence of resorptions was observed (Feuston et al. 1994).

Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals of each sex per dose) were exposed to test substance at 30, 125, 500 or 2000 mg/kg-bw per day, 5 days/week for 13 weeks. No effects were observed on spermatid and spermatozoa counts or morphology of testes and epididymides. Effects in females were not reported (Mobil 1991).

Reproductive and developmental health effects 68334-30-5 Inhalation NOAEC: 3777 mg/m3 for developmental toxicity. A concentration of 3777 mg/m3 (401.5 ppm[h] [i]) of diesel fuelwas administered to pregnant rats from GD 6–15. No developmental effects were noted (Beliles and Mecler 1983).
Reproductive and developmental health effects 68476-34-6 Highest dermal NOAEL: 4050 mg/kg-bw per day for reproductive toxicity. Doses of 405, 1620 or 4050 mg/kg-bw per day (0.5, 2 or 5 mL/kg per day[j] [k]) of diesel fuel No. 2were applied to Sprague-Dawley rats (10 animals of each sex per dose), 5 days/week for 4 weeks. No effects on testes or ovaries were observed (UBTL 1986).
Genotoxicity:
in vivo
64741-59-9

Cytogenetic assay
Negative:
API 83-07 was administered by intraperitoneal injection to Sprague-Dawley rats (15 of each sex per group) at doses of 0, 0.2, 0.67 and 2 g/kg-bw. Bone marrow was obtained at 6, 24 and 48 h after exposure to the test substance. Lethargy and mortality were noted for some rats receiving the highest dose. API 83-07 was found not to affect the mitotic index of bone marrow cells. Testing of API 83-08, using the same protocol, was also observed to be negative (API 1985e, 1986d).

Sister chromatid exchange assay
Positive:
API 83-07 was positive for sister chromatid exchange when administered to mice via intraperitoneal injection at doses of 340, 1700 and 3400 mg/kg-bw (API 1989a).

Genotoxicity:
in vivo
64741-82-8 No studies identified.
Genotoxicity:
in vivo
68476-34-6 Cytogenetic assay
Positive:
Groups of male rats (five animals per dose) were exposed by intraperitoneal injection to 486, 1620 or 4860 mg/kg-bw (0.6, 2.0 or 6.0 ml/kg-bw[j] [k]) of No. 2-DAfor up to 48 h or for 5 days. An increased percentage of aberrations was observed in bone marrow of rats exposed to 2.0 and 6.0 ml/kg-bw (API 1978).
Genotoxicity:
in vivo
68476-30-2 Cytogenetic assay
Positive:
Groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were orally administered 125, 417 or 1250 mg/kg-bw per day for 5 days. Increases in cells with chromatid breaks and in aberrant cells in the bone marrow were observed (Conaway et al. 1984).
Genotoxicity:
in vivo
68334-30-5 Cytogenetic assay
Positive:
Groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed by intraperitoneal injection to diesel fuelat concentrations of 493, 1644 or 4933 mg/kg-bw (0.6, 2.0 or 6.0 ml/kg-bw[j] [l]) for 1 or 5 days. Increased number of aberrant cells reported in bone marrow at the highest dose level (Conaway et al. 1984).
Genotoxicity:
in vivo
68476-30-2
64742-46-7
64742-30-9
Micronuclei induction
Negative:
Groups of CD-1 mice (15 of each sex per dose) were exposed once via oral gavage to 0, 1000, 2500 or 5000 mg/kg-bw. No increase in frequency of micronuclei induction in bone marrow cells was observed (McKee et al. 1994).
Genotoxicity: in vitro 64741-59-9

Mutagenicity
Positive: Of 10 petroleum middle distillates, MD-7 LCO exhibited the highest mutagenicity index (14) in a modified Ames assay. The mutagenicity of the 10 distillates positively correlated with the percentage of three- to seven-ring hydrocarbons (PAHs) found in each distillate, and MD-7 LCO contained 8.7% PAHs (Nessel et al. 1998).

Mouse lymphoma assay
Positive:
API 83-07 was tested at 5–80 nL/mL (without activation) and 2.5–30 nL/mL (with activation) in a forward mutation assay using the cell line L5178Y TK +/−. Cells were exposed for 4 h followed by a 2-day recovery period. API 83-07 was negative for mutagenicity without activation but positive with activation. When tested with activation, API 83-07 exhibited a positive response for mutant frequency (API 1985f). In another study, API 83-08 was positive both with and without activation (API 1985g).

Sister chromatid exchange assay
Equivocal:
API 83-07 was tested at 5–80 µg/mL in Chinese hamster ovary cells with and without activation. In the absence of activation, API 83-07 produced a statistically significant increase in sister chromatid exchanges per cell at 10 and 20 µg/mL (the highest concentrations for which data were available), but no concentration–response was observed. In a repeat study, an increase was statistically significant only at 30 µg/mL. With activation, API 83-07 exhibited statistically significant increases in the frequency of sister chromatid exchanges at 10, 40 and 80 µg/mL, but a clear concentration–response was not observed (API 1988).

Genotoxicity: in vitro 64741-82-8

Mutagenicity
Positive:
DGMK No. 8 was tested with S9 metabolic activation in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 using a modified Ames assay. A mutagenic index of 2.1 was observed, and the test substance contained 8% PAH content (Blackburn et al. 1984, 1986; DGMK 1991).

Positive: Test substance was positive when tested at concentrations of 0.26–42 mg/plate, with and without S9 metabolic activation, in S. typhimurium TA98 and TA100 (Conaway et al. 1984).

Human studies Case report:
diesel oil
Diesel oil used over several weeks as an arm and hand cleaner resulted in epigastric and loin pains, nausea, anorexia, degeneration of kidney tubular epithelium and renal failure. The patient subsequently made a good recovery. There was no history of exposure to any other nephrotoxin (Crisp et al. 1979).
Human studies Case–control study: diesel fuel A case–control study of various cancers revealed an adjusted odds ratio of 1.9 (90% confidence interval 1.2–3.0) for prostate cancer in men exposed to diesel fuel. There was no evidence for a positive dose–response relationship (Siemiatycki et al. 1987).

Abbreviations: CLGO, coker light gas oil; GD, gestation day; LCCD, light catalytic cracked distillate; LCO, light cycle oil; PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.

[a] Different samples of CAS RN 64741-59-9 are referred to as API 83-07, API 83-08, LCCD, Mobil LCO and MD-7 LCO. CAS RN 64741-82-8 is referred to as Mobil CLGO, DGMK No. 8 and light thermal cracked distillate.

[b] LC50, median lethal concentration; LD50, median lethal dose; LOAEC, lowest-observed-adverse-effect concentration; LOAEL, lowest-observed-adverse-effect level; NOAEC, no-observed-adverse-effect concentration; NOAEL, no-observed-adverse-effect level.

[c] Body weight not provided; thus, laboratory standards from Salem and Katz (2006) were used.

[d] The following formula was used for conversion of provided values into mg/kg-bw: (% of dilution × x mL × ρ)/kg-bw.

[e] Density (ρ) not provided; thus, a density value from ECB (2000) was used.

[f] A volume/volume dilution was assumed.

[g] The following formula was used for conversion of provided value into mg/kg-bw: x mg/kg-bw.

[h] The following formula was used for conversion of provided values into mg/m3: [x in parts per million (ppm) × molecular mass (MM)]/24.45.

[i] MM of diesel fuel estimated to be 230 g/mol (www.epa.gov/athens/learn2model/part-two/onsite/es.html).

[j] The following formula was used for conversion of provided values into mg/kg-bw: x ml/kg-bw × ρ.

[k] Density (ρ) not provided; thus, a density from Khan et al. (2001) was used.

[l] Density (ρ) not provided; thus, a density from API (2003b) was used.


Page details

Date modified: