Canary rockfish (Sebastes pinniger) COSEWIC assessment and status report: chapter 17

Technical summary

Sebastes pinniger

Canary rockfish
Sébaste canari

Range of occurrence in Canada: Widespread in the coastal waters of British Columbia


Extent and area information

Extent of occurrence (EO) (km 2 ) - in Canada
>60 000 km 2
Specify trend in EO
Stable
Are there extreme fluctuations in EO?
Probably not
Area of occupancy (AO) (km 2 ) - in Canada
>32 000 km 2
Specify trend in AO
Stable
Are there extreme fluctuations in AO?
Probably not
Number of known or inferred current locations
Widespread, continuous distribution
Specify trend in #
N/A – continuous distribution
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of locations?
N/A – continuous distribution
Specify trend in area, extent or quality of habitat
No known trends


Population information

Generation time (average age of parents in the population)
20-30 years (22.8 U.S. estimate)
Number of mature individuals
4 to 8 million, minimal estimate

Total population trend; % decline over the last/next 10 years or 3 generations.

West Coast of Vancouver Island (WCVI)

Queen Charlotte Sound (QCS)

North coast (west Queen Charlotte Islands)

Are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals?
No evidence of this over 30 years
Is the total population severely fragmented?
No evidence of this
Specify trend in number of populations
Not applicable
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations?
Not applicable
List populations with number of mature individuals in each
Not applicable


Threats (actual or imminent threats to populations or habitats)

Fishing; controlled by quotas, well-monitored, but management not supported by risk analysis.

 

Rescue effect (immigration from an outside source)

U.S. waters: Adjacent population to the south is estimated at 5-10% of unexploited abundance, has been declared overfished. While the fishery has almost been eliminated and rebuilding in U.S. waters is thought to be occurring, the low population levels in U.S. waters would reduce likelihood of a “rescue effect” by movement of juveniles or adults from U.S. populations. Larval immigration leading to recruitment is possible.
Is immigration known or possible?
Yes
Would immigrants be adapted to survive in Canada?
Possibly
Is there sufficient habitat for immigrants in Canada?
Yes
Is rescue from outside populations likely?
Low likelihood at the present time, given current U.S. biomass.


Quantitative analysis

There is no quantitative basis for estimating the probability of extirpation in a specified period.
Not applicable

 

Current Status

COSEWIC: Threatened, November 2007

 

Status and reasons for designation

Status: Threatened
Alpha-numeric code: Met criterion for Endangered, A2b, but Threatened, A2b, because the species is widely distributed, the population includes several million mature individuals, and changes in management since 1995 have improved control of the major threat

Reasons for designation: A comparatively large (maximum weight 5.7 kg), orange-yellow fish that typically inhabits rocky bottoms at 70-270 m depths from the western Gulf of Alaska south to northern California. Its late maturity (13 years for females), long lifespan (84 years), and long generation time (20-30 years) are characteristic of species that are slow to recover following population decline. The species is treated as a single designatable unit. Two surveys in the southern part of its Canadian range, considered the most reliable indicators of population trend, show abundance index declines of 78% and 96% over 30 years and 17 years respectively. Survey indices from the northern part of the range and commercial catch per unit effort indices show no consistent trends but are of relatively short duration and are in some cases based on methods which do not adequately sample areas inhabited by the species. There is uncertainty due to high variability in the various index series (characteristic of trawl surveys) and the unknown degree to which abundance trends in the southern part of the Canadian range reflect abundance trends throughout the species’ range in Canadian waters. Fishing is the most likely cause of the observed decline. Changes to management since 1995 include 100% observer or video monitoring coverage and implementation of individual transferable quotas, which are expected to improve control of fishing. Rescue from contiguous populations to the south is unlikely given that current abundance in the US is estimated at 5-10% of unfished levels, and rescue from populations to the north is uncertain because their status is not well known.

 

Applicability of criteria

Criterion A (Declining total population):
Meets criterion A2b for endangered. Meets criterion A2b for threatened.

Criterion B (Small distribution, and decline or fluctuation):
Extent of occurrence and area of occupancy exceed threshold values.

Criterion C (Small total population size and decline):
Current population size over 1 million individuals, exceeds threshold values.

Criterion D (Very small population or restricted distribution):
Thresholds exceeded.

Criterion E (Quantitative analysis):
Not undertaken.

Page details

Date modified: