Gravel chub (Erimystax x-punctatus) COSEWIC assessment and status report: chapter 11
Technical Summary
Erimystax x-punctatus
Gravel Chub – Gravelier
Range of Occurrence in Canada:
Thames River
Extent and Area information
extent of occurrence (EO) (km²)
(Historic - Polygon Method) - Current <2000
specify trend (decline, stable, increasing, unknown) :
Not Applicable
are there extreme fluctuations in EO (> 1 order of magnitude)?
No
area of occupancy (AO) (km²)
Historic- actual aquatic habitat <20; using 1 km² grid <100; - Current : 0
specify trend (decline, stable, increasing, unknown) :
Extirpated
are there extreme fluctuations in AO (> 1 order magnitude)?
No
number of extant locations :
0
specify trend in # locations (decline, stable, increasing, unknown) :
Not Applicable
are there extreme fluctuations in # locations (>1 order of magnitude)?
No
habitat trend: specify declining, stable, increasing or unknown trend in area, extent or quality of habitat :
Decline
Population information
generation time (average age of parents in the population) (indicate years, months, days, etc.) :
2–3 yr?
number of mature individuals (capable of reproduction) in the Canadian population (or, specify a range of plausible values) :
0
total population trend: specify declining, stable, increasing or unknown trend in number of mature individuals :
Not Applicable
if decline, % decline over the last/next 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is greater (or specify if for shorter time period)
are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals (> 1 order of magnitude)?
No
is the total population severely fragmented (most individuals found within small and relatively isolated (geographically or otherwise) populations between which there is little exchange, i.e., < 1 successful migrant / year)?
No
list each population and the number of mature individuals in each :
0
specify trend in number of populations (decline, stable, increasing, unknown) :
Not Applicable
are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations (>1 order of magnitude)?
No
Threats (actual or imminent threats to populations or habitats)
- high levels of turbidity and siltation resulting from urban and agricultural land use practices
- nutrient loading resulting from agricultural and urban land use practices
Rescue Effect (immigration from an outside source)
No
does species exist elsewhere (in Canada or outside)?
Yes – in the U.S., but not in the Great Lakes watershed that could colonize the Thames River
status of the outside population(s)?
States adjacent to lakes Erie and St. Clair. NY – S1; OH – S3; PA – S1
is immigration known or possible?
Unknown
would immigrants be adapted to survive here?
Unknown
is there sufficient habitat for immigrants here?
No
Quantitative Analysis
-
Existing Status
- Nature Conservancy Ranks (NatureServe 2007)
- Global – G4
- National
- US – N4
- Canada NX
- Regional
- United States
- Arkansa (S3?)
- Illinois (S1S2)
- Indiana (S4)
- Iowa (S3)
- Kansas (S2S3)
- Kentucky (SX)
- Minnesota (S3)
- Missouri (SNR)
- New York (S1)
- Ohio (S3)
- Oklahoma (S2S3)
- Pennsylvania (S1)
- West Virginia (S1)
- Wisconsin (S1)
- United States
- Wild Species 2005 (Canadian Endangered Species Council 2006)
- Canada – 1
- Ontario – 1
- Ontario – Extirpated (OMNR 2007)
- COSEWIC
- Endangered 1985
- Extirpated 1987, 2000, 2008
Status and Reasons for Designation
Status: Extirpated
Alpha-numeric code: Not Applicable
Reasons for Designation: The historic Canadian range of this small minnow was originally a single watershed in southern Ontario. The last record for this species was in 1958 despite extensive, repeated sampling at known sites and other areas of suitable habitat over the last 50 years. Ecosystem restoration of this watershed is underway; however, natural recolonization by the species is not possible because there are no adjacent populations in the Great Lakes watershed.
Applicability of Criteria
- Criterion A (Declining Total Population): Not Applicable – no individuals seen since 1958
- Criterion B (Small Distribution, and Decline or Fluctuation: Not applicable – no individuals seen since 1958
- Criterion C (Small Total Population Size and Decline): Not applicable – no individuals seen since 1958
- Criterion D (Very Small Population or Restricted Distribution): Not Applicable – no individuals seen since 1958
- Criterion E (Quantitative Analysis): Not Applicable – no data.
Page details
- Date modified: