Gravel chub (Erimystax x-punctatus) COSEWIC assessment and status report: chapter 11

Technical Summary

Erimystax x-punctatus

Gravel Chub – Gravelier

Range of Occurrence in Canada:

Thames River

Extent and Area information

extent of occurrence (EO) (km²)

(Historic - Polygon Method) - Current <2000

specify trend (decline, stable, increasing, unknown) :

Not Applicable

are there extreme fluctuations in EO (> 1 order of magnitude)?

No

area of occupancy (AO) (km²)

Historic- actual aquatic habitat <20; using 1 km² grid <100; - Current : 0

specify trend (decline, stable, increasing, unknown) :

Extirpated

are there extreme fluctuations in AO (> 1 order magnitude)?

No

number of extant locations :

0

specify trend in # locations (decline, stable, increasing, unknown) :

Not Applicable

are there extreme fluctuations in # locations (>1 order of magnitude)?

No

habitat trend: specify declining, stable, increasing or unknown trend in area, extent or quality of habitat :

Decline

Population information

generation time (average age of parents in the population) (indicate years, months, days, etc.) :

2–3 yr?

number of mature individuals (capable of reproduction) in the Canadian population (or, specify a range of plausible values) :

0

total population trend: specify declining, stable, increasing or unknown trend in number of mature individuals :

Not Applicable

if decline, % decline over the last/next 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is greater (or specify if for shorter time period)

are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals (> 1 order of magnitude)?

No

is the total population severely fragmented (most individuals found within small and relatively isolated (geographically or otherwise) populations between which there is little exchange, i.e., < 1 successful migrant / year)?

No

list each population and the number of mature individuals in each :

0

specify trend in number of populations (decline, stable, increasing, unknown) :

Not Applicable

are there extreme fluctuations in number of populations (>1 order of magnitude)?

No

Threats (actual or imminent threats to populations or habitats)

  1. high levels of turbidity and siltation resulting from urban and agricultural land use practices
  2. nutrient loading resulting from agricultural and urban land use practices

Rescue Effect (immigration from an outside source)

No

does species exist elsewhere (in Canada or outside)?

Yes – in the U.S., but not in the Great Lakes watershed that could colonize the Thames River

status of the outside population(s)?

States adjacent to lakes Erie and St. Clair. NY – S1; OH – S3; PA – S1

is immigration known or possible?

Unknown

would immigrants be adapted to survive here?

Unknown

is there sufficient habitat for immigrants here?

No

Quantitative Analysis

-

Existing Status

Status and Reasons for Designation

Status: Extirpated

Alpha-numeric code: Not Applicable

Reasons for Designation: The historic Canadian range of this small minnow was originally a single watershed in southern Ontario. The last record for this species was in 1958 despite extensive, repeated sampling at known sites and other areas of suitable habitat over the last 50 years. Ecosystem restoration of this watershed is underway; however, natural recolonization by the species is not possible because there are no adjacent populations in the Great Lakes watershed.

Applicability of Criteria

Page details

Date modified: