American Burying Beetle (Nicrophorus americanus): COSEWIC rapid review of classification

Official title: COSEWIC Rapid Review of Classification on the American Burying Beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Canada

Extirpated

2022

Third party material

Further to the Terms and conditions for this website, some of the photos, drawings, and graphical elements found in material produced by COSEWIC are subject to copyrights held by other organizations and by individuals. In such cases, some restrictions on the use, reproduction or communication of such copyrighted work may apply and it may be necessary to seek permission from rights holders prior to use, reproduction or communication of these works.

Document information

The rapid review of classification process is used by COSEWIC for wildlife species that have not changed status since the previous COSEWIC assessment. Readily available information from the previous status report or status appraisal summary, recovery documents, recovery teams, jurisdictions, conservation data centres, and species experts is initially reviewed by the relevant Species Specialist Subcommittees before being reviewed by COSEWIC. The following is a summary of the relevant information.

COSEWIC Rapid Review of Classification are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk in Canada. This document may be cited as follows:

COSEWIC. 2022. COSEWIC Rapid Review of Classification on the American Burying Beetle Nicrophorus americanus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii pp. (Species at risk public registry).

Production note:

COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Jennifer M. Heron for writing the Rapid Review of Classification on the American Burying Beetle Nicrophorus americanus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by David McCorquodale, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Arthropods Specialist Subcommittee

For additional copies contact:

COSEWIC Secretariat
c/o Canadian Wildlife Service
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Ottawa, ON
K1A 0H3

Tel.: 819-938-4125
Fax: 819-938-3984
E-mail: ec.cosepac-cosewic.ec@canada.ca
www.cosewic.ca

Également disponible en français sous le titre Examen rapide de la classification du COSEPAC sur le Nécrophore d’Amérique (Nicrophorus americanus) au Canada.

COSEWIC assessment summary

Assessment summary – December 2022

Common name: American Burying Beetle

Scientific name: Nicrophorus americanus

Status: Extirpated

Reason for designation: There is sufficient information to document that no individuals of the wildlife species remain alive in Canada. This includes a lack of sightings for 49 years despite (1) being a large, distinctive, and conspicuous insect; (2) a tenfold increase in the number of field entomologists/community scientists as well as studies of carrion-feeding beetles; (3) the fact that it comes to lights yet it has not been captured during an estimated 300,000 trap nights; and (4) directed search in the general area where last seen.

Occurrence: Ontario, Quebec

Status history: Designated Extirpated in November 2011. Status re-examined and confirmed in December 2022.

COSEWIC rapid review of classification

Preface

The American Burying Beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) is a carrion beetle (family Silphidae), and reproduction depends upon the availability of small vertebrate carcasses (for example, bird chicks, rodents). The taxonomy has not changed since the initial COSEWIC (2011) status report. The species is distinct and there are no proposed subspecies or forms. The American Burying Beetle occurs only in North America from the prairie states east to the Atlantic Coast, and from the Upper Peninsula of Michigan south to Texas. In Canada there are historical records from Ontario and Quebec. The most recent collection in Canada took place in 1972. A report on the presence of this species in Nova Scotia (Madge 1956) is considered to have originated in an error, despite it still being referenced in some reports. The record for Manitoba (NatureServe 2021) is unsubstantiated (see Appendix 1 in COSEWIC 2011). No new observations of the American Burying Beetle have been made in Canada since 1972. The historical observations are summarized in the 2011 COSEWIC assessment.

The American Burying Beetle was listed as “Extirpated” on Schedule 1 under the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) in 2017 and as “Extirpated” under the Ontario Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 2013 (King’s Printer for Ontario, 2014). In Quebec, this species is not listed as “Threatened” or “Vulnerable” under the Loi sur les espèces menacées ou vulnérables (LEMV) (RLRQ, c E-12.01) [Act respecting threatened or vulnerable species] (CQLR, c E-12.01). In addition, this species is not integrated on the Liste des espèces susceptibles d’être désignées menacées ou vulnérables [list of wildlife species likely to be designated threatened or vulnerable] (Province of Quebec2021). There are no national or provincial recovery strategies for the species.

Globally, the American Burying Beetle is listed in the IUCN Red List as “Critically Endangered.” The species is listed as “Endangered” under the United States Endangered Species Act. The species is globally listed as G2 (imperilled), nationally listed as N2N3 for the United States and listed as NH (historical) for Canada. In the United States it has been reported from 35 states and remains in the wild in only eight – listed as “Endangered” in all.

It is believed that the species has been extirpated in Canada and from all states conterminous with Canada. It appears very unlikely that the American Burying Beetle has been present but undocumented anywhere within its Canadian range since the most recent collection (in 1972). The American Burying Beetle is a large, distinctive beetle that is easily identified. Natural recolonizing by the species of its former range in Canada appears extremely unlikely. The species might be reintroduced from United States populations.

Status history

Designated Extirpated in November 2011. Status re-examined and confirmed in December 2022.

Updated map

No change in distribution known; see previous assessment (COSEWIC 2011). There was one additional specimen of the American Burying Beetle found within a drawer of unidentified beetles at the Royal Saskatchewan Museum. There was no locality information accompanying the specimen (Sheffield pers. comm. 2021).

Technical summary

Nicrophorus americanus

American Burying Beetle

Nécrophore d’Amérique

Range of occurrence in Canada: Ontario, Quebec

Demographic information
Summary Information Description
Generation time 1 year Only one brood per year in Canada
Is there an [observed, inferred, or projected] continuing decline in number of mature individuals? No Not applicable
Estimated percent of continuing decline in total number of mature individuals within [5 years or 2 generations, whichever is longer up to a maximum of 100 years] No Not applicable
[Observed, estimated, inferred, or suspected] percent [reduction or increase] in total number of mature individuals over the last [10 years, or 3 generations, whichever is longer up to a maximum of 100 years] No Not applicable
[Projected or suspected] percent [reduction or increase] in total number of mature individuals over the next [10 years, or 3 generations, whichever is longer up to a maximum of 100 years] No Not applicable
[Observed, estimated, inferred, or suspected] percent [reduction or increase] in total number of mature individuals over any period [10 years, or 3 generations, whichever is longer up to a maximum of 100 years], including both the past and the future No Not applicable
Are the causes of the decline clearly understood? Partially Habitat loss and fragmentation, increased use of artificial lighting, which may confuse the species’ behaviour; roadkill of wandering adults; mortality due to the use of insecticides; predation by dogs and cats; reduction of appropriate sized cadavers
Have the causes of the decline ceased? No Not applicable
Are the causes of the decline clearly reversible? No Not applicable
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals? Unknown Not applicable
Extent and occupancy information
Summary Information Description
Estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) Not applicable The most recent record in Canada is from 1972
Index of area of occupancy (IAO), reported as 2x2 km grid value Not applicable The most recent record in Canada is from 1972
Is the population “severely fragmented” that is, is >50% of its total area of occupancy in habitat patches that are
(a) smaller than would be required to support a viable population, and
(b) separated from other habitat patches by a distance larger than the species can be expected to disperse?
  1. Not applicable
  2. Not applicable
Not applicable
Number of “locations”Footnote * None The most recent record in Canada is from 1972
Is there an [observed, inferred, or projected] continuing decline in extent of occurrence? Yes Historical decline to extirpation
Is there an [observed, inferred, or projected] continuing decline in index of area of occupancy? Yes Historical decline to extirpation
Is there an [observed, inferred, or projected] continuing decline in number of subpopulations? Yes Historical decline to extirpation
Is there an [observed, inferred, or projected] continuing decline in number of “locations”Footnote *? Yes Historical decline to extirpation
Is there an [observed, inferred, or projected] continuing decline in [area, extent and/or quality of] habitat? Yes Historical decline to extirpation
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of subpopulations? No No evidence of extreme fluctuations
Are there extreme fluctuations in number of “locations”Footnote *? No Not applicable
Are there extreme fluctuations in extent of occurrence? No Not applicable
Are there extreme fluctuations in index of area of occupancy? No Not applicable
Number of mature individuals (in each subpopulation)
Summary Information Description
Subpopulations Number Mature Individuals (give plausible ranges) Notes on individual estimates
not applicable Total No data
Quantitative analysis
Summary Information Description
Is the probability of extinction in the wild at least [20% within 20 years or 5 generations whichever is longer up to a maximum of 100 years, or 10% within 100 years]? Unknown Analysis not conducted
Threats and limiting factors
Summary Information Description
Was a threats calculator completed for this species? No

There has not been a national or provincial recovery strategy prepared.

A threat assessment is not presented for the American Burying Beetle as no extant occurrences are known for this species in Canada. As a result, threats cannot be scored for scope or severity to determine individual threat impacts, nor is it possible to estimate the overall threat impact at this time.

Historical threats, indirect or cumulative effects of the threats, as well as threats that can be hypothesized to affect future reintroduced populations (based on threats affecting naturally occurring and reintroduced populations in the US) are presented in the Description of Threats section

Threats identified in the COSEWIC (2011) status report that may have led to extirpation include:

What additional limiting factors are relevant? Distribution and abundance of brood cadavers, competition for cadaver resources with other Nicrophorus species; minimum spatial area of forest required to sustain beetle subpopulations (for example, habitat fragmentation decreases the minimum size); soil type required for successful burying of cadaver and progeny development.

Rescue effect (natural immigration from outside Canada)
Summary Information Description
Status of outside population(s) most likely to provide immigrants to Canada All US states adjacent to Canada SH (possibly extirpated) or SX (presumed extirpated) Illinois: SH,
Indiana: SX,
Michigan: SH,
Minnesota: SX,
New York: SH,
Ohio: SX,
Pennsylvania: SH,
Wisconsin: SX
Is immigration known or possible? Not known; not possible

All US states adjacent to Canada SH or SX.

All US states adjacent to Canada have SH or SX status, although reintroduction is under way in Ohio (USFW Service 2020)

Would immigrants be adapted to survive in Canada? Possibly Viable, natural populations exist in the US and along with well-established captive populations could provide breeding and release stock. It is suspected that the beetle’s origin may influence its ability to adapt to local conditions (for example, varying climate regime) (US Fish and Wildlife Service 2020)
Is there sufficient habitat for immigrants in Canada? Unknown Not applicable
Are conditions deteriorating in Canada?Footnote + Yes Habitat subject to threats listed above
Are conditions for the source (that is, outside) population deteriorating?Footnote + Yes USFWS (2020) downlisted the species from “Endangered” to “Threatened”; threats have been reduced to the point that it is not currently in danger of immediate extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range, but it is likely to become so within the foreseeable future (NatureServe 2021)
Is the Canadian population considered to be a sink?Footnote + Not applicable Not applicable
Is rescue from outside populations likely? No Rescue would require active release programs. Unassisted immigrants extremely unlikely

Occurrence data sensitivity

Are occurrence data of this species sensitive? No

Status and reasons for designation

Status: Extirpated

Alpha-numeric codes: Not applicable

Reasons for designation: There is sufficient information to document that no individuals of the wildlife species remain alive in Canada. This includes a lack of sightings for 49 years despite (1) being a large, distinctive, and conspicuous insect; (2) a tenfold increase in the number of field entomologists/community scientists as well as studies of carrion-feeding beetles; (3) the fact that it comes to lights yet it has not been captured during an estimated 300,000 trap nights; and (4) directed search in the general area where last seen.

Reason for change of status: Not applicable

Applicability of criteria

A: Decline in total number of mature individuals
Not applicable.

B: Small distribution range and decline or fluctuation
Not applicable.

C: Small and declining number of mature individuals
Not applicable.

D: Very small or restricted population
Not applicable.

E: Quantitative analysis
Not applicable.

Acknowledgements

Funding for the preparation of this report was provided by Environment and Climate Change Canada. The authorities listed below provided valuable data and/or advice.

Authorities contacted

Anderson, Bob. Research Scientist, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario.

Boucher, Stéphanie, Curator, Lyman Entomological Museum, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec.

Canadian National Collection of Insects (CNCI). Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON (online database).

Desrosiers, Nathalie. Biologiste, Direction de la biodiversité et des maladies de la faune, Direction générale de l’expertise sur la faune et ses habitats, Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec, Quebec.

Friesen, Chris, Coordinator, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Gauthier, Isabelle. Biologiste, Coordonnatrice provinciale des espèces, fauniques menacées ou vulnérables, Direction générale de la gestion de la faune et des habitats, Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec, Quebec.

Hubley, Brad. Entomology Collection Manager, Department of Natural History Royal Ontario Museum (ROM). Toronto, Ontario.

Jones, Colin. Provincial Zoologist – Invertebrates, Ontario Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough Ontario.

Mlynarek, Julia. Agriculture and Agri-foods Canada, Harrow Research and Development Centre, Harrow, Ontario.

Paiero, Steven. Curator, University of Guelph Insect Collection, School of Environmental Sciences (Bovey Building), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.

Sheffield, Cory. Invertebrate Curator, Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, Saskatchewan.

Information sources

COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the American Burying Beetle Nicrophorus americanus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 35 pp.

COSSARO (Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario). 2011. COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation for American Burying Beetle (Nicrophorus americanus). Website: http://cossaroagency.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/COSSARO-AmericanBuryingBeetle2011Nov.pdf [accessed March 9, 2021].

iNaturalist. 2021. American Burying Beetle (Nicrophorus americanus). Website: https://inaturalist.ca/taxa/107026-Nicrophorus-americanus [accessed March 9, 2021].

King’s Printer for Ontario, 2014. American Burying Beetle. Website: https://www.ontario.ca/page/american-burying-beetle [accessed Dec 2, 2022].

NatureServe. 2021. NatureServe explorer: an online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Website: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer [accessed February 12, 2021].

Province of Quebec. 2021. Liste des espèces susceptibles d’être désignées menacées ou vulnérables (list of wildlife species likely to be designated threatened or vulnerable). Website: https://mffp.gouv.qc.ca/la-faune/especes/especes-menacees-vulnerables/ [accessed March 9, 2021].

Sheffield, C., pers. comm. 2021. Email correspondence with Jennifer Heron. Invertebrate Curator, Royal Saskatchewan Museum, Regina, Saskatchewan.

Writer of rapid review of classification:

COSEWIC history

The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) was created in 1977 as a result of a recommendation at the Federal-Provincial Wildlife Conference held in 1976. It arose from the need for a single, official, scientifically sound, national listing of wildlife species at risk. In 1978, COSEWIC designated its first species and produced its first list of Canadian species at risk. Species designated at meetings of the full committee are added to the list. On June 5, 2003, the Species at Risk Act (SARA) was proclaimed. SARA establishes COSEWIC as an advisory body ensuring that species will continue to be assessed under a rigorous and independent scientific process.

COSEWIC mandate

The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) assesses the national status of wild species, subspecies, varieties, or other designatable units that are considered to be at risk in Canada. Designations are made on native species for the following taxonomic groups: mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, arthropods, molluscs, vascular plants, mosses, and lichens.

COSEWIC membership

COSEWIC comprises members from each provincial and territorial government wildlife agency, four federal entities (Canadian Wildlife Service, Parks Canada Agency, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and the Federal Biodiversity Information Partnership, chaired by the Canadian Museum of Nature), three non-government science members and the co-chairs of the species specialist subcommittees and the Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge subcommittee. The Committee meets to consider status reports on candidate species.

Definitions (2022)

Wildlife Species
A species, subspecies, variety, or geographically or genetically distinct population of animal, plant or other organism, other than a bacterium or virus, that is wild by nature and is either native to Canada or has extended its range into Canada without human intervention and has been present in Canada for at least 50 years.
Extinct (X)
A wildlife species that no longer exists.
Extirpated (XT)
A wildlife species no longer existing in the wild in Canada, but occurring elsewhere.
Endangered (E)
A wildlife species facing imminent extirpation or extinction.
Threatened (T)
A wildlife species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed.
Special Concern (SC)*
A wildlife species that may become a threatened or an endangered species because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats.
Not at Risk (NAR)**
A wildlife species that has been evaluated and found to be not at risk of extinction given the current circumstances.
Data Deficient (DD)***
A category that applies when the available information is insufficient (a) to resolve a species’ eligibility for assessment or (b) to permit an assessment of the species’ risk of extinction.

* Formerly described as “Vulnerable” from 1990 to 1999, or “Rare” prior to 1990.

** Formerly described as “Not In Any Category”, or “No Designation Required.”

*** Formerly described as “Indeterminate” from 1994 to 1999 or “ISIBD” (insufficient scientific information on which to base a designation) prior to 1994. Definition of the (DD) category revised in 2006.

The Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, provides full administrative and financial support to the COSEWIC Secretariat.

Page details

2023-10-18