Progress report on steps taken for protection of critical habitat for species at risk in Canada (October 2021 to March 2022)

June 2022

Document information

Progress Report on Steps Taken for Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada (October 2021 – March 2022).
Cat. No.: CW66-590/2022-1E-PDF
ISBN: 978-0-660-44136-8

Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce materials in this publication, in whole or in part, for the purposes of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from Environment and Climate Change Canada's copyright administrator. To obtain permission to reproduce Government of Canada materials for commercial purposes, apply for Crown Copyright Clearance by contacting:

Environment and Climate Change Canada
Public Inquiries Centre
12th Floor, Fontaine Building
200 Sacré-Coeur Boulevard
Gatineau QC K1A 0H3

Telephone: 819-938-3860
Toll Free: 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only)
Email: enviroinfo@ec.gc.ca

Cover photo: © Environment and Climate Change Canada

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment
and Climate Change, 2022

Aussi disponible en français

Departmental message

Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and Parks Canada Agency (PCA) have a core responsibility to protect, conserve and recover terrestrial species at risk and their critical habitat. This responsibility is shared with provincial and territorial governments. ECCC and PCA work cooperatively with provinces and territories, Indigenous Peoples, other federal departments and agencies, and other partners and stakeholders to undertake conservation measures to recover species at risk and protect biodiversity at large.

A key tool for the protection of species at risk in Canada is the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA). Listing species under SARA and producing the required recovery documents allows for the refinement of long-term recovery objectives and strategies for each species at risk and their habitats. However, as more species are listed under SARA, it has become evident that a species-by-species approach to recovery is highly resource-intensive and can lead to uncoordinated, siloed actions that do not enable us to meet our collective species at risk requirement to the greatest extent possible. To better focus on recovery outcomes and undertake needed actions in an effective and timely manner, consensus has emerged on the need for a prioritized, multi-species, stewardship-based approach; one that is grounded in stronger multi-jurisdictional partnerships and engagement of all partners, notably Indigenous Peoples.

Since 2018, the Government of Canada has been collaborating with provincesFootnote 1, territories, Indigenous Peoples, and other conservation partners to implement the Pan-Canadian Approach to Transforming Species at Risk Conservation in CanadaFootnote 2 (Pan-Canadian Approach). Under the Pan-Canadian Approach, conservation efforts are concentrated on shared priorities across Canada, focusing on a set of priority places, species, and sectors. These concerted efforts are bringing conservation partners together to collectively plan and implement stewardship actions on the ground to achieve better outcomes for species at risk.

ECCC, along with PCA, provinces and territories, Indigenous Peoples and other partners continues to advance species at risk conservation through the implementation of the Pan-Canadian Approach and related policy and program improvements.

Introduction

The purposes of SARA are to prevent wildlife species from being extirpated or becoming extinct, to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity, and to manage species of special concern to prevent them from becoming threatened or endangered. The responsibility for conservation of species at risk in Canada is shared by different levels of government. The Government of Canada first looks to the provinces and territories for the protection of terrestrial species’ habitat on non-federally administered lands. The federal government is responsible for critical habitatFootnote 3 protection for all species on federal lands.

Species at risk are important elements of healthy ecosystems, and protecting them helps support biodiversity. The protection of critical habitat supports the Goal 15, Healthy Wildlife Populations under the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy to protect and recover species, and conserve Canadian biodiversity. Critical habitat protection also supports United Nations Sustainable Development Target 15.5 (of Goal 15) to take urgent and significant action to reduce the degradation of natural habitats, halt the loss of biodiversity and, by 2030, protect and prevent the extinction of threatened species.

Under SARA, the Government of Canada is obliged to track and report on actions taken and measures put in place to protect identified critical habitat of species at risk. This responsibility is found under section 63 of the Act. The department has published eight reports to date on the measures taken. This report focuses on information related to the protection of critical habitat for terrestrial species at risk in Canada.

In addition to reporting on the implementation of SARA, federal, provincial and territorial governments have been implementing the Pan-Canadian Approach since 2018. Now in its fourth year of implementation, the Pan-Canadian Approach is enabling conservation partners to work together to achieve better outcomes for species at risk. The Pan-Canadian Approach is also renewing relationships and strengthening collaboration between our governments and Indigenous Peoples, and other partners, including industry and non-governmental organizations.

In the spirit of the Pan-Canadian Approach, and of section 63 of SARA, this report provides a summary of steps and actions taken and underway by provincial, territorial and federal governments to contribute towards the protection of identified critical habitat for 254 terrestrial species at riskFootnote 4 in Canada, an increase of 6 species since the previous report published on December 2022 (see Annex A). The report includes information related to species at risk critical habitat on federal and non-federal lands. Building on the previous eight publicationsFootnote 5, this report focuses on steps and actions that have been taken during the reporting period of October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Since the first multi-species report (June 2019), 313 steps and actions have been taken to protect identified critical habitat for species at risk.

Report framework / category definitions

ECCC contacted provinces and territories to request that they report on steps and actions taken to contribute towards the protection of critical habitat on non-federally administered land. This request began with critical habitat as identified in federal recovery strategies or action plans for federally listed terrestrial species at risk. The report also includes information on other collaborative efforts as well as information on steps and actions taken on federal lands including input from the Parks Canada Agency.

Guided by the Pan-Canadian Approach, steps or actions are organized in this report based on whether they relate to a single species, or relate to multi-species, priority places, or priority sectors. ECCC summarized the input and categorized it into the type of step or action taken. The key categories of steps or actions are defined as follows:

The list of species in each jurisdiction to which this report applies can be found in Annex A. This list represents all terrestrial species currently listed on Schedule 1 of SARA as threatened or endangered for which critical habitat has been identified in a final federal recovery strategy or action planFootnote 6.

The Yukon and Northwest Territories devolution agreements have given administration and control of large portions of land to the Yukon and Northwest Territories governments. This type of agreement is under negotiation for Nunavut. The federal government is working with the governments of the Yukon, Northwest Territories, Indigenous governments and organizations, and northern Wildlife Management Boards to develop a path forward for protection of critical habitat on devolved lands (also known as territorial lands) and will also look to do so with its counterparts in Nunavut through the devolution process.

1. Protection of critical habitat in the provinces

For critical habitat occurring on non-federally administered lands in the provinces, the Government of Canada first looks to the laws of the provinces for the protection of terrestrial species’ habitat. In the following sections, a summary of the applicable legislation is provided, followed by the different actions and measures put in place which reduce the risk of destruction of critical habitat.

1.1 British Columbia

Status summary

In British Columbia (BC), there are 97 species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal land and three species with federally identified critical habitat only on federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A1). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within BC. No legislative changes were made during the reporting period; the summary of legislation is below.

The Government of British Columbia does not currently have stand-alone species at risk legislation. The purpose of most provincial land use legislation in BC is to manage industrial and commercial activities, including the environmental effects of those activities.

The Ecological Reserve Act, the Park Act, the Wildlife Act, the Land Act and their associated regulations include provisions that could, in some circumstances, result in an outcome that prohibits critical habitat destruction within ecological reserves, in conservancies or provincial parks, and in wildlife management areas respectively. However, the scope of lands covered by these Acts is limited, and, except within ecological reserves, there are discretions that may enable the authorization of activities likely to result in the destruction of critical habitat. The Forest and Range Practices Act (FRPA) and the Oil and Gas Activities Act and associated regulations include enforceable prohibitions, but the prohibitions only apply to forest harvesting activities, oil and gas activities, or range use practices under some circumstances, vary in their application depending on the specific land use designation, and have less restrictive provisions or exemptions for various types of operators.

On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation in BC may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment, please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Legislative or regulatory Spotted Owl caurina subspecies BC approved another one-year deferral (until March 2023) (interim protection) that defers timber harvesting in the Spuzzum and Utzlius creek drainages covering over 32,671 ha of provincial Crown land
Protected areas Woodland Caribou (Southern Mountain population) Not previously reported, althought it did not occur within the October 2021 – March 2022 period, on March 10, 2021, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy in BC expanded Blue River Black Spruce Park by 59 ha. This addition will conserve an additional 59 ha of Southern Mountain Caribou critical habitat
Legislative or regulatory Woodland Caribou (Southern Mountain population) On December 16, 2021, the Motor Vehicle Prohibition Regulation under the BC Wildlife Act was amended, resulting in the closure of 13 snowmobile riding areas covering about 454,000 ha. These new closures help mitigate the impacts of winter motorized recreation on the central group of Southern Mountain Caribou. This adds to 1,903,915 ha of existing management actionsFootnote 7 throughout Southern Mountain Caribou herds in BC
Protected areas

Rocky Mountain Tailed Frog

Whitebark Pine

Woodland Caribou (Southern Mountain population)

Not previously reported, although it did not occur within the October 2021 – March 2022 period, the Minister of Forests, Lands Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development established 20 WHAs for Rocky Mountain Tailed Frog by Order covering 13,017 ha in total. For a subset of these WHAs (nine), the core no harvest zone is 350 ha. These designations will also conserve 188 ha of proposed Whitebark Pine critical habitat and 2 ha of Southern Mountain Caribou critical habitat
Protected areas

Dun Skipper, vestris subspecies

Little Brown Myotis

Western Painted Turtle (Pacific Coast population)

On October 5th, 2021, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy in BC established a Class A Provincial Park, Hwsalu-Utsum, covering 143 ha in total. This park overlaps with critical habitat of Dun Skipper (37 ha), Western Painted Turtle (2 ha), and Little Brown Myotis (143 ha)
Protected areas

Desert Nightsnake

Great Basin Gophersnake

Lewis’s Woodpecker

Little Brown Myotis

Pallid Bat

Western Rattlesnake

Western Tiger Salamander (Southern Mountain population)

Not previously reported, although it did not occur within the October 2021 – March 2022 period, on March 10, 2021, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy in BC expanded the following provincial parks:

  • Beatton Lake by 22 ha to include foreshore habitat. This Class A park overlaps with 363 ha of Little Brown Myotis critical habitat (CH)
  • Echo Lake by 65 ha to include foreshore habitat. This Class A overlaps with 218 ha of Great Basin Goperhsnake CH
  • Skaha Bluffs by 65 ha. This Class A park overlaps with 377 ha of Lewis’s Woodpecker CH, 219 ha of Western Tiger Salamander CH, 208 ha of Pallid Bat CH, 554 ha of Desert Nightsnake CH and 554 ha of Western Rattlesnake CH
  • Edge Hills by 68 ha which will conserve an additional 5 ha of Lewis’s Woodpecker CH and 68 ha of Great Basin Gophersnake CH
  • Okanagan by 21 ha which will conserve an additional 2.5 ha of Lewis’s Woodpecker CH and
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No new steps and actions were taken for multiple species during this reporting period

1.2 Alberta

Status summary

In Alberta, there are 22 species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands, and three species with federally identified critical habitat only on federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A2). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within Alberta. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

The Government of Alberta does not have stand-alone species at risk legislation. The Wildlife Act and its Wildlife Regulation cover 12 SARA listed species (see Annex A2 for details) and are the primary provincial legislative tools that address wildlife management in Alberta. The Wildlife Act does not contain prohibitions against the destruction of habitat, but it enables the Minister to make regulations respecting the protection of wildlife habitat and endangered species.

The Wilderness Areas, Ecological Reserves, Natural Areas and Heritage Rangelands Act, the Provincial Parks Act and the Willmore Wilderness Park Act include provisions on critical habitat destruction in wilderness areas, ecological reserves, wildland provincial parks, and within Willmore Wilderness Park respectively. On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation, such as the Public Lands Act and the Public Lands Administration Regulation, may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Stewardship Caribou (Boreal population) Completion of all three Cold Lake Habitat Restoration projects, with 350,470 trees planted between October 2021 and March 2022, for a total of 457.6 km treated and a total of 537,470 trees planted
Protected areas Caribou (Boreal population) In February 2022, Alberta expanded Kitaskino Nuwenëné Wildland Provincial Park by 152,630 ha. The total area of the park is now 314,510 ha, making it the largest contiguous area of protected boreal forest in the world. Kitaskino Nuwenëné has extensive overlap with Boreal Caribou critical habitat (Red Earth and Richardson ranges), and this expansion increased the overlap from 82,506 ha to 232,158 ha
Legislative or regulatory

Caribou (Boreal population)

Woodland Caribou (Southern Mountain population)

Little Brown Myotis

Northern Myotis

Porsild’s Bryum

Alberta has restricted coal exploration and development in the Eastern Slopes of the Rocky Mountains until direction on coal activities has been embedded in completed or updated land-use plans. Restrictions were expanded during this reporting period to include category 3 and 4 lands (as defined by the 1976 coal policy). Not previously reported, although it did not occur within the October 2021 – March 2022 period, coal exploration and development became restricted on Category 2 lands as of April 2021, and has never been permitted on Category 1 lands. These areas (Category 1, 2, 3, and 4 lands) include critical habitat for Caribou (Boreal population), Woodland Caribou (Southern Mountain population), Little Brown Myotis, Northern Myotis, and Porsild's Bryum
Stewardship Greater Sage-Grouse, urophasianus subspecies Multiple habitat management actions were taken by a private landowner in collaboration with the Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) at a ranch to maintain and enhance the quality of Greater Sage-Grouse habitat on the property. These activities included improving cattle watering equipment and sites, to limit access to grazing and sensitive riparian areas in Greater Sage-Grouse critical habitat
Stewardship Tiny Cryptantha The 2F&G trail was completed in the Fall of 2021 and runs through the City of Medicine Hat’s Ranchlands 2F&G residential subdivision, which is currently protected for Tiny Cryptantha. The subdivision was made into a park by the city prior to Tiny Cryptantha critical habitat designated. The trail includes interpretive signage to educate trail users and will promote environmental conditions in the area
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details

Securement

Stewardship

Multiple species (including:

Greater Sage-Grouse, urophasianus subspecies,

Soapweed,

Greater Short-horned Lizard and,

Loggerhead Shrike, Prairie subspecies)

The ACA has undertaken a number of actions to promote and enhance stewardship of Species at Risk habitats, including long-term securement of critical habitat within Alberta. On January 21, 2022, the offer to purchase closed for an ACA (fee-simple) purchase of the Milk River Badlands Conservation Site in southeastern Alberta. The entire 64.7 ha parcel is identified as critical habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse, and is within Soapweed range. Other species expected to be present on the site are Greater Short-horned Lizard and Loggerhead Shrike
Stewardship Multiple Species

ACA’s Multiple Species at Risk (MULTISAR) program collaborates with producers to create Habitat Conservation Strategies on the following amount of critical habitat:

  • Tiny Cryptantha: 185 ha
  • Western Spiderwort: 525 ha
  • Smooth Goosefoot: 171 ha
  • Small-flowered Sand Verbena: 92 ha
  • Soapweed and Yucca moths (Yucca Moth, Non-pollinating Yucca Moth, Five-spotted Bogus Yucca Moth): 177 ha
  • Greater Sage-Grouse, urophasianus subspecies: 18,8 ha
  • Greater Short-horned Lizard: 721 ha
  • Dusky Dune Moth: 127 ha
  • Gold-edged Gem: 129 ha
Stewardship Multiple Species Not previously reported, although it did not occur within the October 2021 – March 2022 period, in 2019 Alberta developed provincially standardized criteria outlining requirements for grazing disposition holders on public lands to qualify for extended tenure. Since the implementation of the program in 2019, 40% of the grazing lease area reviewed (118,934 ha) has been recommended for extended tenure. Over 25% of inspected southern Alberta grazing leases have been recommended for extended tenure. Broadly speaking, this measure provides benefits to CH by encouraging responsible grazing practices that promote range health and improve or maintain critical habitat on grazing leases for multiple grassland-dependent Species at Risk

1.3 Saskatchewan

Status summary

In Saskatchewan, there are 21 species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A3). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within Saskatchewan. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

The Government of Saskatchewan does not have stand-alone species at risk legislation. Rather, The Wildlife Act, 1998 and its Wild Species at Risk Regulations, covering nine SARA listed species (see Annex A3) are the primary provincial legislative tools that can address wildlife habitat and species at risk in the province. The Wildlife Act, 1998 allows for the Lieutenant Governor in Council to make regulations that designate an area of the province for protection of wildlife and their habitat, however, it also includes provisions to authorize activities in these areas. The Wild Species at Risk Regulations is the only regulation that includes provisions regarding species at risk; however, the prohibitions are limited.

The Provincial Lands Act, 2016 and The Conservation Easement Act include provisions on critical habitat destruction in Ecological Reserves, Representative Area Ecological Reserves and on land that is under a crown conservation easement, respectively. However, the scope of lands covered under these Acts is limited and there are specific provisions associated with each designated reserve and easement. On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment, please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Policy Caribou (Boreal population) The Saskatchewan’s Forest Service Branch has proposed an amendment to the Forest operating Plan Standard (currently adopted under the Saskatchewan Environmental Code) that will require all license holders (for the harvest of a cumulative annual volume ≥50,000 m3) to include Caribou Habitat Management Areas or other habitat areas designated within a recovery plan for species at risk, as part of the spatial information to be included in the said licence holder’s operating plan. Pending endorsement of all of the proposed amendments by the Standard Working Group (comprised of both Forest Service Branch staff and Forest Industry representatives), the Forest Service Branch is anticipating that a revised version of the Forest Operating Plan standard will be published by the end of the fiscal year 2021-2022
Range and management planning Caribou (Boreal population) Consistent with commitments made in the conservation agreement under section 11 of SARA between Canada and Saskatchewan for Boreal Caribou, in October 2021, Saskatchewan finalized the SK2 West range plan, and posted the SK2 East draft range plan for a 60 day public comment period. ECCC has assessed the range plans for consistency with ECCC’s Range Plan Guidance or Woodland Caribou, Boreal population. Following finalization of the SK2 East plan, ECCC will assess the three final SK2 sub-range plans together to determine whether, at the range-level, they outline a clear, credible path to achieving 65% undisturbed habitat to support a self-sustaining local population
Stewardship Greater Sage-Grouse, urophasianus subspecies During this reporting period, 11 gas wells were reclaimed, and an Acknowledgement of Reclamation was received. Seven wells had an area of 25m2 reclaimed each, benefiting Chestnut-collared Longspur, Swift Fox, Burrowing Owl, Greater Sage-Grouse and Sprague's Pipit. Four of them were 200m2 each, benefitting Chestnut-collared Longspur, Swift Fox and Sprague's Pipit
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
Policy Bats A Bat Exclusion policy was approved which prevents the destruction of occupied residences during critical windows of use by these species. An educational component on living with bats is included

1.4 Manitoba

Status summary

In Manitoba, there are 20 species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A4). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within Manitoba. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

The Endangered Species and Ecosystems Act (ESEA) covers 19 SARA listed species with critical habitat identified on non-federal lands (see Annex A4) and is the primary provincial legislative tool to protect species at risk and their habitat on non-federal lands. In general, the ESEA includes prohibitions against destroying, disturbing or interfering with the habitat of listed endangered or threatened species. However, the ESEA includes exemptions for developments and licenses under The Environment Act. Manitoba has not required proponents to apply for exemption under the ESEA for development projects licensed under The Environment Act. The ESEA also includes provisions for designating endangered or threatened ecosystems as protected through ecosystem preservation zones, which would apply to any overlapping critical habitat. However, as of March 2022, no ecosystem preservation zones had been designated.

Additionally, the Ecological Reserves Act and the Provincial Parks Act includes provisions on critical habitat destruction in ecological reserves, and certain zones within provincial parks. On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Stewardship Caribou (Boreal population) Manitoba mitigated forest harvesting activities’ impact on Boreal Caribou habitat by reviewing forest operating plans and incorporating known information about Boreal Caribou important areas to avoid and/or incorporate mitigation measures. Forest harvest mitigation actions include access changes, harvest block size changes, harvest blocks that were not approved for harvesting, retaining residual patches to reduce line of sight. Core caribou habitats (i.e. calving areas, winter areas, post calving areas) defined by home range analysis have been avoided
Stewardship Caribou (Boreal population)

Manitoba continues to undertake extensive review and detailed assessments of development proposals for potential effects on boreal caribou habitat (i.e. calving, winter areas, post-calving areas) and has denied permits for activities such as blasting for quarry development and has limited mining exploration activities during critical timing windows.

Additionally, this reporting period, Manitoba has denied access proposals and recommended alternative access to avoid impacts on important caribou habitat. As it relates to forestry activities, Manitoba has deferred decisions to ensure caribou habitat protections can be incorporated and have denied harvest in important caribou areas. With respect to mitigations, Manitoba has implemented reduced footprint size and timing restrictions as methods to reduce impacts to important caribou areas. This work is a continuation of ongoing efforts not previously reported

Agreements or easements Caribou (Boreal population) Canada and Manitoba have completed negotiations on a draft conservation agreement under section 11 of SARA. Preparations are underway to proceed with public engagement on the draft agreement
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No new steps and actions were taken for multiple species or priority sectors during this reporting period

1.5 Ontario

Status summary

In Ontario, there are 99 species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands and two species with federally identified critical habitat only on federal land to which this report relates (see Annex A5). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, four new species (Cerulean Warbler, Northern Dusky Salamander (Carolinian population), Riverine Clubtail (Great Lakes Plains population), and Showy Goldenrod (Boreal population)) had critical habitat identified on non-federal lands within Ontario. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

Habitat protection under Ontario’s Endangered Species Act (ESA) is in place for 184 species at risk in Ontario, 96 of which are part of the 99 terrestrial species with critical habitat identified on non-federal lands in the province (see Annex A5). Under the Crown Forest Sustainability Act (CFSA), forest operations in Crown forests are exempt from certain prohibitions of the ESA provided the forest operations are conducted in accordance with an approved forest management plan. Impacts to species at risk as a result of forest operations are managed through requirements under the CFSA framework. Western Chorus Frog (Great Lakes / St. Lawrence - Canadian Shield population) (not currently listed under ESA), Golden-winged Warbler (currently listed Special Concern under the ESA) and Goldenseal (currently listed Special Concern under the ESAFootnote 8) are the only three species with final critical habitat in Ontario that do not currently receive any direct habitat protection under the ESA. Habitat protection for the Red-Headed Woodpecker has been in place under the ESA since the species was uplisted from Special Concern to Endangered on the Species at Risk in Ontario List in January 2022.

On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment, please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Agreements or easements Caribou (Boreal population) Ontario and Canada have been working together to identify outcomes, conservation measures and actions for inclusion in a bilateral conservation agreement for Boreal Caribou under sections 10 and 11 of the federal Species at Risk Act. A proposal regarding a conservation agreement for Boreal Caribou that includes specific measures for habitat restoration and protection, including commitments to exploring the potential for new and expanded protected areas, was posted to the Environmental Registry of Ontario for public consultation from February 4, 2022 to March 21, 2022. Ontario and Canada collaboratively hosted engagement sessions with a range of stakeholder groups and Indigenous communities and organizations to discuss and seek input on this proposal

Policy

Range and management planning

Caribou (Boreal population)

Under the Ontario Forest Management Guide for Boreal Landscapes, the requirements for the management of Boreal Caribou habitat through space and time, including through the development of a Dynamic Caribou Habitat Schedule, continued to be incorporated into forest management plans that intersect with Boreal Caribou ranges. Individual management plans are at various stages of completion depending on plan renewal schedules. Within the reporting period, the following forest management plans were approved:

  1. Abitibi River Forest
  2. Kenora Forest
  3. Whitefeather Forest
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
Protected areas Blanding's Turtle (Great Lakes/St. Lawrence population), Eastern Whip-poor-will, Least Bittern

On January 26, 2022, Ontario sent notice to local Indigenous communities and posted a notice on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) to seek input related to the proposal to designate Ostrander Crown Land Block and Point Petre Provincial Wildlife Area as a Conservation Reserve under the Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act. The comment period on the ERO was 45 days (January 26 to March 12, 2022). Following the consultation period, Ontario will consider comments from local Indigenous communities, stakeholders and the public to inform a decision on the proposal.

Once regulation occurs, additional protections of the Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act will apply, and development activities outside of infrastructure for sustainable outdoor recreation would be prohibited

Legislative or regulatory

Multiple species.

Two of the species to which it applies currently have final critical habitat: Blanding’s Turtle (Great Lakes/St. Lawrence population) and Eastern Whip-poor-will

The province of Ontario has taken further steps during this reporting period towards enabling the use of the Species at Risk Conservation Fund (Fund) that was introduced through changes to the ESA in 2019. Habitat protection under s. 10 of the ESA will remain in place for conservation fund species. The Fund will provide a new option for proponents that are authorized to undertake activities that impact select species at risk. Instead of completing beneficial actions for species impacted by those activities, proponents will have the option of contributing to a fund that allows the agency to pool the resources and determine how best to implement long-term, large-scale and strategic protection and recovery activities that benefit eligible species. Under this approach, proponents would still be required to take action to avoid and minimize impacts on species at risk and their habitats.

On December 10, 2021, a regulation was made to designate six species at risk as conservation fund species: Barn Swallow, Blanding's Turtle (populations occurring within the Ontario Shield ecozone), Bobolink, Butternut, Eastern Meadowlark and Eastern Whip-poor-will. The regulation also prescribes the associated species conservation charge formulae and administrative requirements for the purposes of the Fund. On the same date, a regulation was made to enable the use of the Fund option under three conditional exemptions that are applicable to four of the designated conservation fund species (Barn Swallow, Bobolink, Butternut, Eastern Meadowlark). The option for proponents to pay charges to the Species at Risk Conservation Fund will be available starting on April 29, 2022

Stewardship Multiple Species During this reporting period, the provincial Species at Risk Stewardship Program supported 83 ongoing or new stewardship projects that support the protection and recovery of the Province's species at risk. Since October 2021, those projects have reported the restoration or enhancement of 630 ha of species at risk habitat and, through outreach and education initiatives, were able to create over 300,000 outreach impressions on the public

1.6 Quebec

Status summary

In Quebec, there are 37 species at riskFootnote 9 with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A6). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, three new species (Cerulean Warbler, Eastern Waterfan, and Skillet Clubtail) had critical habitat identified on non-federal lands within Quebec. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

In Quebec, the Act respecting threatened or vulnerable species (LEMV) covers 33 SARA listed species (see Annex A6) and designates species as threatened or vulnerable. Additionally, LEMV has a List of Species Likely to be Designated Threatened or Vulnerable that, essentially preventive in nature, is an administrative and educational tool aimed at halting, or even reversing, the decline of species. However, there is no legislative obligation to designate or protect habitats necessary for the survival or recovery of a species. In addition, although the LEMV and the Act respecting the conservation and development of wildlife (LCMVF) apply in principle to both private and public lands, the Regulation respecting wildlife habitats (RHF) limits the designation of wildlife habitats to land in the domain of the State, therefore limiting protection of habitat of at-risk wildlife species. However, efforts are continuing to modernize the RHF and review these provisions.

In addition, Quebec has several tools available to create different types of protected areas. The designation of protected areas is an element of the Quebec Government’s strategy to promote sustainable development and the protection of biodiversity, including species at risk. However, with few exceptions, the areas of critical habitat covered by protected areas are generally very small except for the Green-scaled Willow for which 100% of the critical habitat is in the Gaspésie National Park established under the Parks Act. On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment please refer to 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Recovery action Caribou (Atlantic - Gaspésie population) In fall 2021, a project to dismantle approximately 49 km of road was completed within the Caribou (Atlantic‑Gaspésie population) range on the Chic-Chocs wildlife reserve. Vehicle access is no longer possible on the sections of dismantled road. Since 2018, 113 km of road have been dismantled, contributing to the restoration of this species’ habitat
Recovery action Caribou (Boreal population) In fall 2021, 35 km of road were dismantled within the Caribou (Boreal population) range on the caribou wildlife site south of Val d’Or. Since 2017, 157 km of road have been dismantled by the Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs (MFFP) in Caribou (Boreal population) habitat. The project is expected to continue into summer 2022
Federal steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details

SARA s. 80 emergency order

(Legislative or regulatory)

Western Chorus Frog (Great Lakes / St. Lawrence – Canadian Shield population) In December 2021, Governor in Council made one emergency order to protect 20 ha of critical habitat for Western Chrous Frog (Great Lakes / St. Lawrence – Canadian Shield population) in Longueuil, pursuant to section 80 of SARA
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
Stewardship

White Wood Aster

False Hop Sedge

American Ginseng

Bicknell’s Thrush

Wood Turtle

Blunt-lobed Woodsia

The administrative agreement concerning the protection of threatened or vulnerable plant and animal species and other biodiversity elements in Quebec’s forests has updated its mapping of protection sites for the period between October 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022. This update came into effect on February 18, 2022, and includes the number of protection sites on public forest lands in Quebec.

The following wildlife species are subject to protective measures, including multiple terms and conditions, to ensure the maintenance of features that are important for species at the protection sites:

  • Bicknell’s Thrush: 571 protection sites
  • Wood Turtle: 242 protection sites

The following plant species are subject to a general protective measure prohibiting any forest development activities in the area to which the measure applies, which generally corresponds to the forest stands where the target species is found:

  • White Wood Aster: a single occurrence, on public forest lands in Quebec, under the protection of a protected area (Mont-Orford National Park; expanded portion)
  • False Hop Sedge: eight occurrences, on public forest lands in Quebec located in protection areas
  • American Ginseng: 37 known occurrences, on public forest lands in Quebec, protected by 16 administrative protection sites, 2 classified exceptional forest ecosystems, and 7 exceptional forest ecosystem projects
  • Blunt-lobed Woodsia: a single occurrence in Gatineau Park

1.7 New Brunswick

Status summary

In New Brunswick, there are 13 species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A7). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within New Brunswick. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

The Species at Risk Act (NB SARA) is the primary provincial legislative tool that can protect critical habitat for species at risk on non-federal lands. It replaced the New Brunswick Endangered Species Act (NB ESA) in 2013. Schedule A of the NB SARA contains the species that were transferred from the NB ESA and kept the status they had under the NB ESA, including species that were listed as Endangered. Of the 13 species at risk with federally identified critical habitat in New Brunswick, eight species of Schedule A may receive habitat protection through transitional provisions of the NB SARA up until they are removed from Schedule A (see Annex A7). To be removed from Schedule A, the species must be listed and regulations provide that the prohibitions under section 28 applyFootnote 10. Section 28 of the NB SARA states that no person shall kill, harm, harass, take, possess, buy, sell or trade an individual of a listed species at risk. Section 28 only applies to listed extirpated, endangered, or threatened species. Once listed, the NB SARA provides the Government of New Brunswick with the power to protect species at risk critical habitat by regulation or by order but only at the discretion of the Minister. To date no species has been listed under the NB SARA, and therefore no regulations have been made or orders issued in respect to the designation or protection of species at risk critical habitat under the NB SARA.

The NB SARA and the Protected Natural Areas Act include provisions for species at risk critical habitat within Protected Natural Areas. Additionally, the Parks Act includes prohibitions against activities that could result in the destruction of species at risk critical habitat, though limited.

Under the Conservation Easements Act, individual easements could include prohibitions against activities likely to result in the destruction of species at risk critical habitat. On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Legislative or regulatory Piping Plover, melodus subspecies During this reporting period, the province did not support development activities at a site within the critical habitat of Piping Plover within a land-use review
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No new steps and actions were taken for multiple species during this reporting period

1.8 Prince Edward Island

Status summary

In Prince Edward Island (PEI), there is one species at risk with federally identified critical habitat habitat on non-federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A8). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within PEI. There have been no modifications to legislation which applies to species at risk within this reporting period.

The Wildlife Conservation Act is the primary provincial legislative tool that can protect critical habitat for species at risk on non-federal lands. The Wildlife Conservation Act provides the Government of Prince Edward Island with the power to protect the critical habitat of species at risk that have been designated (at the discretion Lieutenant Governor in Council) as a threatened or endangered species. To date, no regulations have been made under the Wildlife Conservation Act to designate a species at risk. Species at risk critical habitat could also, potentially, be protected on private land under an agreement with a private landowner which may impose a covenant or easement on the private landowner’s land. Unlike stand-alone easement legislation, which tends to be enforced under common law, such an agreement appears to be enforceable under the Wildlife Conservation Act.

The Natural Areas Protection Act includes provisions for species at risk critical habitat that occurs within natural areas designated under the Act. On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation, such as the Planning Act, may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No content on the steps and actions taken for specific species was provided for this reporting period
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No content on the steps and actions taken for multiple species was provided for this reporting period

1.9 Nova Scotia

Status summary

In Nova Scotia, there are 15 species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands and one species with federally identified critical habitat only on federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A9). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within Nova Scotia.

The Endangered Species Act (NS ESA) covers all 15 SARA listed species (see Annex A9) and is the primary provincial legislative tool that can protect habitat for species at risk on non-federal lands. The NS ESA has prohibitions against the destruction of residence such as nests or hibernacula, including dwellings that are anthropogenic structures. The NS ESA also provides the mechanism (through regulation or an order) to list prohibitions against the destruction of species at risk critical habitat on non-federal lands. However, no regulations or orders protecting species at risk critical habitat have been issued under the NB ESA.

The NS ESA, the Wilderness Areas Protection Act, the Brothers Islands Wildlife Management Regulations (under the Wildlife Act), the Provincial Parks Act, the Conservation Easements Act and the Special Places Protection Act include provisions for species at risk critical habitat. On non-federal lands, some provisions in other pieces of legislation may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

Work within priority places is ongoing and detailed information on actions carried out for each project will be included in the April 2022 - September 2022 reporting period to coincide with the timing of project reporting.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No content on the steps and actions taken for specific species was provided for this reporting period
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No content on the steps and actions taken for multiple species was provided for this reporting period

1.10 Newfoundland and Labrador

Status summary

In Newfoundland and Labrador, there are ten species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A10). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within Newfoundland and Labrador. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

The Newfoundland and Labrador Endangered Species Act (NFL ESA) covers ten SARA listed species (see Annex A10) and is the primary provincial legislative tool that can protect critical habitat for species at risk on non-federal lands. The NFL ESA enables the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to make an order to set aside an area of land to be protected as species at risk critical habitat. However, no orders have been issued for species at risk under the NFL ESA.

The Wilderness and Ecological Reserves Act and the Provincial Parks Act both include provisions for species at risk critical habitat within Ecological Reserves and Provincial Parks respectively. On non-federal land, some provisions in other pieces of legislation may be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the provincial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

There are no Pan-Canadian Approach Federal/Provincial/Territorial (FPT) Priority Places within this province.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No content on the steps and actions taken for specific species was provided for this reporting period
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No content on the steps and actions taken for multiple species was provided for this reporting period

2. Protection of critical habitat in the territories

For critical habitat occurring on non-federally administered lands and in respect of the spirit of devolution agreements in the territories, the Government of Canada first looks to the laws of the territory for the protection of terrestrial species’ habitat. In the following sections, a summary of the applicable legislation is provided followed by the different actions and measures put in place which reduce the risk of destruction of critical habitat, as reported by the territorial governments.

2.1 Yukon

Status summary

In the Yukon, there is one species at risk with identified critical habitat on non-federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A11). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within the Yukon. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

The Yukon has no stand-alone legislation protecting species at risk; however, certain activities impacting individuals of wildlife species are regulated under the Wildlife Act. On territorial lands, some provisions in various territorial acts can be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

For more details on the territorial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

There is no critical habitat on non-federal land in this Pan-Canadian Approach FPT Priority Places within this territory.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Agreements or easements Caribou (Boreal population) Consistent with commitments made in the conservation agreement under section 11 of SARA between Canada, Yukon, the First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun and the Gwinch’in Tribal Council for Boreal Caribou, the two phase abundance survey was conducted in March 2022 out of Eagle Plains, Yukon. The study area covered suitable late winter habitat within Yukon and some portions of NorthWest Territories. Broad scale lichen habitat modeling was completed to identify high priority areas for critical habitat protection and local scale modeling is currently being evaluated
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species, priority places and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No new steps and actions were taken for multiple species during this reporting period

2.2 Northwest Territories

Status summary

In Northwest Territories (NWT) there is one species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands and two species with critical habitat identified only on federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A12). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within NWT.

The Government of NWT’s primary legislation for protecting species at risk, their Species at Risk (NWT) Act (NWT SARA), applies to Caribou (Boreal population). The NWT SARA has the authority to make regulations to protect critical habitat, however no such regulations have been put in place.

Protected areas in NWT can prevent some disturbance due to human activity in certain critical habitat, while ‘candidate areas’ may have interim protection through land withdrawals or land use plans. Moreover, regional land use plans contribute to conservation of species at risk habitat in the NWT in certain areas. Approved land use plans are implemented through comprehensive land claim agreements and the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act.

For more details on the territorial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

There are no Pan-Canadian Approach FPT Priority Places within this territory.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
Range and management planning Caribou (Boreal population)

Following the October 2021 completion of the public review period for the interim Wek’èezhìı Boreal Caribou range,the Wek’èezhìı Renewable Resources Board approved the interim range plan in accordance with Section 12.5.1 of the Tłı̨chǫ̨ Agreement in December 2021. The Government of NWT finalized and published the interim range plan in March 2022. The interim Wek’èezhìı Boreal Caribou range plan covers 49,505 km2 of Boreal Caribou distribution in the NWT.

In January 2022, funding was provided to North Slave Métis Alliance for verification and additional collection of Indigenous Knowledge about Boreal Caribou and their habitat, in support of range planning.

Work towards the development of the Southern NWT Boreal Caribou range plan continued. A second round of community meetings to review and verify Indigenous Knowledge mapping of Boreal Caribou habitat was completed

Protected areas Caribou (Boreal population) The establishment of Ts’udé Nilįné Tuyeta Territorial Protected Area was completed with the publication of regulations under the Protected Areas Act in January 2022
Stewardship Caribou (Boreal population) Phase 1 of a two-year project to develop an inventory of candidate Boreal Caribou habitat restoration offset sites was initiated in early 2022. Phase 2 of this project is expected to be the design of a habitat restoration trial project
Legislative or regulatory Caribou (Boreal population) The Government of NWT is developing new guidance for industry to address current best practices for mitigating the impacts of development on Boreal Caribou habitat. In March 2022, the GNWT released the draft “Guidelines for Exploration and Development in NWT Boreal Caribou Habitat” for public review until April 30, 2022
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No new steps and actions were taken for multiple species during this reporting period

2.3 Nunavut

Status summary

In Nunavut, there are two species at risk with federally identified critical habitat on non-federal lands to which this report relates (see Annex A13). From October 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, no additional critical habitat for species was identified on non-federal lands within Nunavut. There have been no modifications to species at risk legislation within this reporting period.

The Wildlife Act is the main legislative tool that can specifically protect habitat for species at risk. In general, the Wildlife Act provides prohibitions against the destruction of species at risk critical habitat on public lands. However so far, no species are listed under the Nunavut Wildlife Act. On public lands the Territorial Parks Act includes prohibitions against activities on critical habitat, and some provisions in various territorial acts can be used to prohibit specific activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

In addition, the Nunavut Planning Commission (NPC) leads the development of the Nunavut Land Use Plan (NLUP), an obligation under the Nunavut Agreement. Through its provisions, the NLUP is another legislative tool that could support the protection of critical habitat if the three approving Parties (Government of Canada, Government of Nunavut and Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated) came to agreement. In July 2021, NPC released a new version of the draft NLUP.

For more details on the territorial legislative assessment please refer to the 2019 Report on Steps Taken and Protection of Critical Habitat for Species at Risk in Canada.

There is no Pan-Canadian Approach FPT Priority Places within this territory.

The following section highlights the actions taken for species at risk critical habitat protection within the designated reporting period.

Steps and actions taken for specific species
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No content on the steps and actions taken for specific species was provided for this reporting period
Steps and actions taken related to multiple species and priority sectors
Category Species Details
All Multiple species No content on the steps and actions taken for multiple species was provided for this reporting period

3. Other collaborative and federal protection of critical habitat

Other collaborative efforts for steps and actions related to multiple species
Category Species Details
Legislative or regulatory Migratory Birds The Minister of Environment issued a statement under s. 58(5.2)(b) of SARA describing how critical habitat identified for species (A14) that are both a migratory bird protected under the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 (MBCA) and listed on Schedule 1 of SARA as endangered, threatened or extirpated are protected on non-federal lands in Canada

4. Protection of critical habitat on federal land

The Government of Canada relies on provisions of SARA to legally protect critical habitat on federal lands. There are three tools available for use under SARA: description in the Canada Gazette [s.58(2)]; protection statements [s.58(5)(b)]; and, orders [s.58(5)(a)]. A description of critical habitat in the Canada Gazette applies to species at risk found in federally protected areas (including National Wildlife Areas, Migratory Bird Sanctuaries, National Parks, and Rouge National Urban Park). A protection statement included in the public registry can also be used to describe how critical habitat is protected. The government can also make use of orders under specific sections of SARA for the protection of critical habitat not legally protected by provisions in, or measures under, this or any other Act of Parliament. In addition to regulatory tools mentioned above, ECCC also takes a stewardship approach to support critical habitat protection on federal lands. The Critical Habitat Interdepartmental Program (CHIP), established in 2020, is managed by the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS) of ECCC. This program provides funding to federal departments, agencies, and Crown corporations for projects aimed at the recovery of Canada's species at risk through the restoration and conservation of their critical habitat on federally owned or administered lands.

PCA administers more than 464,000 km2 of lands and waters in Canada and protects species at risk in these places. In addition to implementing SARA, PCA has a range of legislative tools that protect species at risk and their critical habitat. For example, in national parks, PCA uses the Canada National Parks Act other legislation like the Impact Assessment Act and associated regulations give special protection to species at risk through mechanisms like zoning, designation of “Environmentally Sensitive Areas” and seasonal closures. Ecological integrity is the first priority in managing national parks which includes the protection of species at risk and their critical habitat.

The following section summarizes the actions and measures taken by both ECCC and PCA for the protection of critical habitat for terrestrial species at risk. This section includes information for the reporting period of October 2021 to March 2022.

Steps and actions taken for specific species

Category Species Details

SARA ss. 58(2) description in the Canada Gazette

(Legislative or regulatory)

Black-tailed Prairie Dog

Eastern Waterfan

In October 2021 and February 2022, Parks Canada Agency led the completion of one description of critical habitat for Black-tailed Prairie Dog and for one Eastern Waterfan published in the Canada Gazette, Part I

SARA ss. 58(2) description in the Canada Gazette

(Legislative or regulatory)

Dense-flowered Lupine

Victoria’s Owl-clover

Cerulean Warbler

In January 2022 and March 2022, ECCC led the completion of one description of critical habitat for Dense-flowered Lupine and Victoria’s Owl-clover and for one Cerulean Warbler published in the Canada Gazette, Part I
SARA ss. 58(5)(b) ministerial order (Legislative or regulatory) Gattinger’s Agalinis In February 2022, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada made one order to protect the critical habitat of Gattinger’s Agalinis on federally administered lands, pursuant to section 58 of SARA

Annex A – lists of species with critical habitat identified on non-federally administered lands by province/territory

A1 – Species with critical habitat identified in British Columbia

a Species with critical habitat identified only on federal lands.

A2 – Species with critical habitat identified in Alberta

b Species listed provincially under Alberta’s Wildlife Regulations, prescribed as endangered species.

c Species with critical habitat identified only on federal lands.

A3 – Species with critical habitat identified in Saskatchewan

d Species listed provincially under the Saskatchewan Wild Species at Risk Regulations as threatened, endangered or extirpated wild species at risk.

A4 – Species with critical habitat identified in Manitoba

e Species listed provincially as endangered or threatened species under the ESEA regulations.

A5 – Species with critical habitat identified in Ontario

f Species provincially listed as endangered or threatened, and receiving some habitat protection under the Ontario ESA.

g Species with critical habitat identified only on federal lands.

A6 – Species with critical habitat identified in Quebec

h Species designated as Threatened or Vulnerable under the Act respecting Threatened or Vulnerable Species (LEMV) or listed as a species likely to be designated as threatened or vulnerable under the LEMV.

A7 – Species with critical habitat identified in New Brunswick

i Species provincially listed as endangered in Schedule A of the New Brunswick Species at Risk Act.

A8 – Species with critical habitat identified in Prince Edward Island

A9 – Species with critical habitat identified in Nova Scotia

j Species provincially listed as endangered or threatened wildlife species under the Nova Scotia Endangered Species Act.

k Species with critical habitat identified only on federal lands.

A10 – Species with critical habitat identified in Newfoundland and Labrador

l Species provincially listed as endangered or threatened under the Newfoundland and Labrador Endangered Species Act.

A11 – Species with critical habitat identified in Yukon

A12 – Species with critical habitat identified in the Northwest Territories

m Species with critical habitat identified only on federal lands.

A13 – Species with critical habitat identified in the Nunavut

A14 – Migratory birds species with federal protection in place for critical habitat identified on non-federal land under SARA s. 58(5.2)

Page details

2022-06-21