Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) Great Lakes Plains population in Canada - 2015 [Proposed]
- Part 1 - Federal Addition to the Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario, prepared by Environment Canada.
- Additions and modifications to the adopted document
- 1. Species Status Information
- 2. Recovery Feasibility
- 3. Population and Distribution Objectives
- 4. Broad Strategies and General Approaches to Meet Objectives
- 5. Critical Habitat
- 6. Measuring Progress
- 7. Statement on Action Plans
- 8. Effects on the Environment and Other Species
- 9. References
- Appendix A: Subnational Conservation Ranks of Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Canada and the United States
- Part 2 - Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario, prepared by J. M. Bowles for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
- Part 3 - Bent Spike-rush: Ontario Government Response Statement, prepared by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
Environment Canada. 2015. Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) Great Lakes Plains population in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. 19 pp. + Annexes.
For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk Public Registry.
Cover illustration: © Sam Brinker
Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement de l’éléocharide géniculée (Eleocharis geniculata), population des plaines des Grands Lacs, au Canada [Proposition] »
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2015. All rights reserved.
Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.
Under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996), the federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together on legislation, programs, and policies to protect wildlife species at risk throughout Canada.
In the spirit of cooperation of the Accord, the Government of Ontario has given permission to the Government of Canada to adopt the Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario (Part 2) under Section 44 of the Species at Risk Act. Environment Canada has included an addition (Part 1) which completes the SARA requirements for this recovery strategy.
Environment Canada is adopting the provincial recovery strategy with the exception of section 2, Recovery. In place of section 2, Environment Canada is establishing its own performance indicator; adopting the Government of Ontario’s goal and the government-led and government-supported actions of the Bent Spike-rush Ontario Government Response StatementFootnote1 (Part 3) as the population and distribution objective and the broad strategies and general approaches to meet the population and distribution objective; and is adopting the habitat regulated under Ontario’s Endangered Species Act, 2007 as critical habitat for the Bent Spike-rush.
The federal recovery strategy for the Bent Spike-rush in Canada consists of three parts:
Part 1 – Federal Addition to the Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario, prepared by Environment Canada.
Part 2 - Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario, prepared by J. M. Bowles for the Ontario Ministry of Natural ResourcesFootnote2.
Part 3 – Bent Spike-rush: Ontario Government Response Statement, prepared by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.
The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996) agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of recovery strategies for listed Extirpated, Endangered, and Threatened species and are required to report on progress within five years.
The Minister of the Environment is the competent minister for the recovery of the Bent Spike-rush and has prepared the federal component of this recovery strategy (Part 1), as per section 37 of SARA. SARA section 44 allows the Minister to adopt all or part of an existing plan for the species if it meets the requirements under SARA for content (sub-sections 41(1) or (2)). The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (now the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry) led the development of the attached recovery strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Part 2) in cooperation with Environment Canada.
Success in the recovery of this species depends on the commitment and cooperation of many different constituencies that will be involved in implementing the directions set out in this strategy and will not be achieved by Environment Canada, or any other jurisdiction alone. All Canadians are invited to join in supporting and implementing this strategy for the benefit of the Bent Spike-rush and Canadian society as a whole.
This recovery strategy will be followed by one or more action plans that will provide information on recovery measures to be taken by Environment Canada and other jurisdictions and/or organizations involved in the conservation of the species. Implementation of this strategy is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints of the participating jurisdictions and organizations.
The federal addition was prepared by Angela McConnell and Rachel deCatanzaro (Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service – Ontario) with support from Krista Holmes, Lee Voisin (Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service – Ontario) and Andrew MacDonald (formerly Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service – Ontario). Elizabeth Rezek, Madeline Austen and Lesley Dunn (Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service – Ontario), Paul Johanson (Environment Canada – Canadian Wildlife Service, National Capital Region), Jay Fitzsimmons, Aileen Wheeldon, Leanne Jennings and Eric Snyder (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry) reviewed and provided comments and advice during the development of this document.
Acknowledgement and thanks is given to all other parties that provided advice and input used to help inform the development of this recovery strategy including various Aboriginal organizations and individuals, landowners, citizens and stakeholders who provided input and/or participated in consultation meetings.
The following sections have been included to address specific requirements of the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) that are not addressed in the Province of Ontario’s Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario (Part 2) and to provide updated or additional information.
Under SARA, there are specific requirements and processes set out regarding the protection of critical habitat. Therefore, statements in the provincial recovery strategy referring to protection of the species’ habitat may not directly correspond to federal requirements, and are not being adopted by Environment Canada as part of the federal recovery strategy. Whether particular measures or actions will result in protection of critical habitat under SARA will be assessed following publication of the final federal recovery strategy.
Since the publication of the provincial recovery strategy (Part 2), the Bent Spike-rush (Great Lakes Plains population) has been listed as EndangeredFootnote3 on Schedule 1 of the federal SARA. In Ontario, the Bent Spike-rush remains listed as Endangered under the Ontario Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA). The species also occurs in British Columbia (BC) and is listed as EndangeredFootnote4 under the SARA as Bent Spike-rush (Southern Mountain population). The BC population will be addressed in a separate recovery strategy.
The Bent Spike-rush’s global conservation status is Secure (G5)Footnote5. However, it should be noted that the species has not been reviewed by NatureServe since 1990 (NatureServe 2013).
In Canada, the species’ national conservation status is Critically Imperilled/ImperilledFootnote6 (N1N2). Its conservation status in British Columbia and Ontario is Critically ImperilledFootnote7 (S1). The national conservation status for the Bent Spike-rush in the United States is UnrankedFootnote8 (NNR) and it is considered Critically Imperilled or Imperilled in 6 of 21 (29%) American states within its range (NatureServe 2013) (Appendix A).
In Ontario, the Bent Spike-rush is extant in two locations, one of which occurs along the Lake Erie shoreline at Long Point National Wildlife Area, and the other of which occurs just inland of Lake Erie at Cedar Springs (on a beach ridge along the shoreline of former glacial Lake Warren). Less than 1% of the global range of the Bent Spike-rush occurs in Canada, where the species is at the northern extent of its North American distribution (COSEWIC 2009)
Based on the following four criteria outlined by the Government of Canada (2009), there are unknowns regarding the feasibility of recovery for the Bent Spike-rush – Great Lakes Plains population. In keeping with the precautionary principle, a full recovery strategy has been prepared as would be done when recovery is determined to be feasible.
Individuals of the wildlife species that are capable of reproduction are available now or in the foreseeable future to sustain the population or improve its abundance.
Yes. Individuals capable of reproduction were recently confirmed to be present in Ontario, as evidenced by the estimated number of mature individuals in 2007: 1,000 to 2,000 found at Long Point and 300 to 500 at Cedar Springs (COSEWIC 2009). There are also individuals capable of reproduction in states near Ontario, including Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania (COSEWIC 2009). Globally, this species is widespread and found within North America, West Indies, Bermuda, Central and South America, Asia, Africa, Pacific Islands, and Australia (COSEWIC 2009).
Species’ abundance, and the number of mature individuals available, may fluctuate from year to year due to the dynamic nature of its habitat, and detectability may vary due to the difficulty of identifying the plant at different life stages. However, the species is maintained over the long term by the local seedbank that contains achenesFootnote9 which can remain dormant for many years (COSEWIC 2009). Thus, although the number of reproducing individuals may be low in one year, the overall population is supported by the seedbank which will continue to produce individuals under the appropriate growing conditions for a number of years.
Sufficient suitable habitat is available to support the species or could be made available through habitat management or restoration.
Yes. Sufficient habitat is available to support the current population. In Ontario, the Bent Spike-rush utilizes “wet, sandy to muddy soil in open flats on or along the edges of ephemeralFootnote10 ponds and wet meadows" (COSEWIC 2009). The extent of interdunal ponds and meadow marsh habitat changes in response to changes in water levels. Water levels in habitats located along the shore of Lake Erie are linked at least partially to changes in the Lake Erie water level. Thus, the amount of suitable habitat can vary from one year to the next. Long term changes in water levels may affect the amount and/or quality of suitable habitat available.
The primary threats to the species or its habitat (including threats outside Canada) can be avoided or mitigated.
Unknown. The primary threat to the Great Lakes Plains population of the Bent Spike-rush is competition with non-native Common Reed (Phragmites australis) (COSEWIC 2009). In areas where the non-native Common Reed has invaded or continues to invade, habitat quality is declining for many native species of flora and fauna, as it quickly outcompetes native species for resources. The invasion of Common Reed threatens both extant Ontario populations of the Bent Spike-rush at Cedar Springs (COSEWIC 2009) and Long Point (COSEWIC 2009; Korol pers. comm. 2014). Although there are techniques available to control Common Reed (OMNR 2011), it is unknown how the Bent Spike-rush will respond to control measures, nor is it known whether control of Common Reed at the Bent Spike-rush sites is logistically feasible. In addition, residential development may pose a potential threat to the Cedar Springs population (Bowles 2010); although, it is possible for habitat to be protected from development through legislation and stewardship.
Recovery techniques exist to achieve the population and distribution objectives or can be expected to be developed within a reasonable timeframe.
Unknown. There are management techniques available to address the threat of non-native Common Reed (OMNR 2011); however, as noted above, the feasibility of employing these techniques at extant sites of the Bent Spike-rush needs to be evaluated. In addition, little is known about the species’ reproductive biology, including factors affecting seed dormancy, germination, as well as seed dispersal, fruiting success, and seed bank characteristics. Therefore, it is unknown what types of recovery techniques would benefit the Bent Spike-rush. It is also unknown whether these knowledge gaps can be filled and whether any subsequent development of recovery techniques can be undertaken in a reasonable timeframe.
The reason for the small and uneven distribution of the Bent Spike-rush in southern Ontario at present is unknown. Because the Bent Spike-rush has only been recorded at three locations in south-western Ontario to date (two of which are considered extant), it is possible that the species has always been rare in the province, in which case the species may always be vulnerable to anthropogenic and natural stressors despite maintaining the currently existing populations, by virtue of its small distribution.
The provincial recovery strategy contains the following recovery goal for the recovery of Bent Spike-rush in Ontario:
- To prevent further loss of habitat within the area of occupancy at both populations where it occurs so that populations are maintained.
The Government Response Statement for the province of Ontario lists the following goal for the recovery of Bent Spike-rush in Ontario:
- The government’s goal for the recovery of Bent Spike-rush is to prevent further loss and degradation of habitat at both locations where it occurs so that populations are maintained.
Under SARA, a population and distribution objective for the species must be established. Environment Canada is adopting the recovery goal in the Bent Spike-rush Ontario Government Response Statement (Part 3) as the population and distribution objective for the Bent Spike-rush (Great Lakes Plains population) under SARA.
The government-led and government-supported actions table from the Bent Spike-rush Ontario Government Response Statement (Part 3) are adopted as the broad strategies and general approaches to meet the population and distribution objective. Environment Canada is not adopting the approaches identified in section 2 of the Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario (Part 2).
Section 41(1)(c) of SARA requires that recovery strategies include an identification of the species’ critical habitat, to the extent possible, as well as examples of activities that are likely to result in its destruction. Under SARA, critical habitat is “the habitat that is necessary for the survival or recovery of a listed wildlife species and that is identified as the species’ critical habitat in the recovery strategy or in an action plan for the species".
Identification of critical habitat is not a component of the provincial recovery strategy under the Province of Ontario’s ESA. However, following the completion of the provincial recovery strategy for this species, a provincial habitat regulation was developed for the Bent Spike-rush, effective July 2012. A habitat regulation is a legal instrument that prescribes an area that will be protectedFootnote11 as the habitat of the species by the Province of Ontario. The habitat regulation identifies the geographic area within which the habitat for the species is prescribed and the regulation may apply and explains how the boundaries of regulated habitat are determined (based on biophysical and other attributes).The regulation is dynamic and automatically in effect whenever the conditions described in the regulation are met.
Environment Canada adopts the description of the Bent Spike-rush habitat under section 24.1.1 of Ontario Regulation 242/08Footnote12 made under the provincial ESA as the critical habitat in the federal recovery strategy. The area defined under Ontario’s habitat regulation contains the biophysical attributes required by the Bent Spike-rush to carry out its life processes. To meet specific requirements of SARA, the biophysical attributes of critical habitat are further detailed below.
The areas prescribed under Ontario Regulation 242/08 – Bent Spike-rush habitat are described as follows:
- 24.1.1 (1) For the purpose of clause (a) of the definition of "habitat" in subsection 2
- (1) of the Act [ESA], the areas described in subsection (2) that are located in the following geographic townships are prescribed as the habitat of Bent Spike-rush:
- The geographic Township of Walsingham within the County of Norfolk.
- The geographic Township of Raleigh within the Municipality of Chatham-Kent.
- (2) Subsection (1) applies to the following areas:
- An interdunal pond in which Bent Spike-rush exists or on which Bent Spike-rush depends to carry on its life processes.
- An area belonging to a Great Lakes coastal meadow marsh or any other ecosite identified under the land classification system for southern Ontario if Bent Spike-rush exists in that area or depends on the area to carry on its life processes.
- 3. Any other area in which Bent Spike-rush exists or on which Bent Spike-rush depends to carry on its life processes.
- (3) For the purposes of paragraph 1 of subsection (2), the boundaries of an interdunal pond referred to in that paragraph shall be determined based on its maximum historic extent.
The biophysical attributes of critical habitat for the Bent Spike-rush, which capture the characteristics required by the species to carry out its life processes (e.g., dispersal, reproduction, growth) include:
- Great Lakes coastal meadow marsh, interdunal pondFootnote13, sand barren, shoreline beach, or any other natural or human-made area which possesses the following characteristics:
- open, sandy to muddy soils; and
- absence of dense, permanentFootnote14 vegetation; and
- inundated periodically or by fluctuating lake levels, with the water table near the ground surface, and soils remaining moist for most of the growing seasonFootnote15
The Bent Spike-rush is an annual species that inhabits dynamic habitat (due to fluctuating water levels, changes in sand deposition, etc.). The boundaries (i.e. spatial extent) of populations and the habitat it depends on to carry out its life processes may vary from year-to-year. For the purposes of identifying critical habitat, the boundaries of Great Lakes coastal meadow marsh and other ecosites where the Bent Spike-rush exists are defined using the Ecological Land Classification (ELC) for Southern Ontario (Lee et al. 1998) (OMNR 2012). The ELC framework provides a standardized approach to the interpretation and delineation of dynamic ecosystem boundaries and as such encompasses the biophysical attributes of the habitat for the Bent Spike-rush. Habitat assessments would be required to describe and map the specific ELC ecosites currently occupied by Bent Spike-rush; however, broader habitat information (i.e., ELC community series) is available and used in the identification. For areas where the Bent Spike-rush exists that are not well defined using the ELC framework, the boundary would be defined by the extent of the biophysical attributes described above and required to support the life processes of the species. The precise boundaries may need to be verified in the field.
Through this recovery strategy, the areas prescribed as habitat for the Bent Spike-rush under section 24.1.1 of Ontario Regulation 242/08 become critical habitat identified under SARA. Since the regulation is dynamic and automatically in effect whenever the conditions described in the regulation are met, if any new locations of the Bent Spike-rush are confirmed within the geographic areas listed under subsection (1) of the regulation (see Figure 1), the habitat regulation under the ESA applies. Refer to the Habitat Protection Summary for Bent Spike-rush (OMNR 2012) for further details on the provincial habitat regulation and its application. However, these new locations would only become critical habitat once identified in an updated recovery strategy or a subsequent action plan.
In applying the critical habitat criteria above to the best available data (as of April 2014), critical habitat is identified for the two known extant local populations of the Bent Spike-rush in Canada (Figure 2, See also Table 1). At this time, critical habitat is generalized to include broader habitat boundaries (i.e., ELC community series), totaling up to 20 haFootnote16, and this generalized description can be used to direct recovery and protection activities until more detailed habitat information to determine finer boundaries is obtained. The critical habitat identified is considered sufficient to meet the population and distribution objective for the Bent Spike-rush.
Critical habitat for the Bent Spike-rush is presented using a 1 X 1 km UTM grid. The 1 X 1 km UTM grid is part of a standardized grid system that indicates the general geographic areas containing critical habitat, which can be used for land use planning and/or environmental assessment purposes. In addition to providing these benefits, the 1 X 1 km Standardized UTM grid respects provincial data-sharing agreements. The areas of critical habitat within each grid square occur where the description of critical habitat is met. More detailed information on regulated habitat may be requested on a need-to-know basis from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. More detailed information on critical habitat to support protection of the species and its habitat may be requested on a need-to-know basis by contacting Environment Canada – Canadian Wildlife Service.
Long description for Figure 1
Long description for Figure 2
Long description for Figure 3
|Critical Habitat Unit||1 x 1 km Standardized UTM Grid Square IDNoteaof Table 1||UTM Grid Square CoordinatesNotebof Table 1a
|UTM Grid Square CoordinatesNotebof Table 1b
|Critical Habitat Unit Area (ha)Notecof Table 1||Land TenureNotedof Table 1|
|Long Point 1||17NH71_30||573000||4710000||1||Federal Protected Area – Long Point National Wildlife Area|
|Long Point 2||17NH71_30
|8||Federal Protected Area – Long Point National Wildlife Area|
|Long Point 3||17NH71_40
|2||Federal Protected Area – Long Point National Wildlife Area|
|Long Point 4||17NH71_70
|1||Federal Protected Area – Long Point National Wildlife Area|
Total of 20 ha in 5 critical habitat units
Understanding what constitutes destruction of critical habitat is necessary for the protection and management of critical habitat. Destruction is determined on a case by case basis. Destruction would result if part of the critical habitat was degraded, either permanently or temporarily, such that it would not serve its function when needed by the species. Destruction may result from a single activity or multiple activities at one point in time or the cumulative effects of one or more activities over time (Government of Canada 2009). It should be noted that not all activities that occur in or near critical habitat are likely to cause its destruction.
Activities described in Table 2 are examples of those likely to cause destruction of critical habitat for the species; however, destructive activities are not necessarily limited to those listed.
|Description of Activity||Description of Effect in Relation to Function Los||Details of Effect|
|Conversion of habitat for residential or other developments, roads, or trails. Conversion of habitat results in direct loss of critical habitat which the species relies on for basic survival, successful seed germination and seedling establishment.||Direct removal or compaction of substrate would render the habitat unsuitable for the Bent Spike-rush||Water draw down as a result of new residential developments near critical habitat could permanently alter the hydrology of the area – see below. If this activity were to occur within the bounds of critical habitat, effects would be direct and cumulative, at any time of the year. Also, the removal of a portion of the habitat could compromise the long-term sustainability of the population|
|Activities that cause substantial alterations to the hydrological regime (e.g., draining, ditching)||Although Bent Spike-rush habitat is naturally dynamic, human activities that cause substantial changes to the hydrologic regime that alter natural flow or water levels (e.g., causing sustained drying or flooding of habitat) could reduce or eliminate suitable habitat.||If this activity were to occur within or outside the bounds of critical habitat, effects could be cumulative or may occur from a single event, at any time of the year.|
|Introduction of invasive exotic plant species (e.g., non-native Common Reed).||Invasive species may render the habitat unsuitable for the Bent Spike-rush by creating shaded conditions. Invasive species may compete with the Bent Spike-rush for resources, such as light, space and nutrients, leading to a reduction in population size and possibly local extirpations||Effects are direct and cumulative and may occur at any time of the year. This activity must occur within the bounds of critical habitat to cause its destruction.|
|Activities which remove significant amounts of soil or substrate (e.g., dredging or construction).||Removal of significant amounts of the soil or substrate that is suitable for seed germination, seedling establishment, and/or the survival and growth of plants would render the habitat unable to support the dispersal, reproduction and growth of the Bent Spike-rush.||Effects are direct and cumulative and may occur at any time of the year. This activity must occur within the bounds of critical habitat to cause its destruction.|
|Planting of trees or shrubs that could shade out areas used by the species.||Planting of trees or shrubs may render the habitat unsuitable for the Bent Spike-rush by creating shaded conditions which the species cannot tolerate.||Effects are direct and cumulative and may occur at any time of the year. This activity must occur within the bounds of critical habitat to cause its destruction.|
The performance indicator presented below provide a way to define and measure progress toward achieving the population and distribution objectives. Every five years, success of recovery strategy implementation will be measured against the following performance indicator:
- Existing populations of the Bent Spike-rush in southern Ontario have been maintained.
One or more action plans will be completed and posted on the Species at Risk Public Registry for the Bent Spike-rush, Great Lakes Plains population by December 31, 2022.
A strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is conducted on all SARA recovery planning documents, in accordance with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. The purpose of a SEA is to incorporate environmental considerations into the development of public policies, plans, and program proposals to support environmentally sound decision-making and to evaluate whether the outcomes of a recovery planning document could affect any component of the environment or any of the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy’s goals and targets.
Recovery planning is intended to benefit species at risk and biodiversity in general. However, it is recognized that strategies may also inadvertently lead to environmental effects beyond the intended benefits. The planning process based on national guidelines directly incorporates consideration of all environmental effects, with a particular focus on possible impacts upon non-target species or habitats. The results of the SEA are incorporated directly into the strategy itself, but are also summarized below in this statement.
This federal recovery strategy will clearly benefit the environment by promoting the recovery of the Bent Spike-rush, Great Lakes Plains population. The Bent Spike-rush is found on wet, sandy soil in open flats along edges of ephemeral ponds and wet meadows associated with Lake Erie (COSEWIC 2009). Efforts to create or recover the species’ habitat could have positive impacts on associated species including Green Spike-rush (Eleocharis flavescens var. olivacea), Elliptic-fruited Spike-rush (E. elliptica), Square-stemmed Spike-rush (E. quadrangulata), Low Nut-rush (Scleria verticillata), Twig-rush (Cladium autumnalis), and Greater Canadian St. John’s wort (Hypericum majus) (COSEWIC 2009). Maintaining the habitat for this species will require work to reduce or eliminate the invasive species, non-native Common Reed. The elimination of this invasive species would ensure the habitat remains in a natural and open state which would positively affect all species using this area. Treatment options are more limited for non-native Common Reed ‘stands’ found in wetland areas or immediately adjacent to water; therefore, alternate approaches need to be considered to protect these aquatic habitats and species found within them.
Several studies have demonstrated that non-native Common Reed is a fast-growing invasive species, which causes severe damage by decreasing biodiversity and destroying habitat for other species, particularly in wet or moist habitats (OMNR 2011). non-native Common Reed is considered a threat for many species, including species at risk such as the Bent Spike-rush, Virginia Mallow, Pink Milkwort and Fowler’s Toad. Contribution towards the control of non-native Common Reed as part of habitat management for the Bent Spike-rush in open riparian habitats will benefit other species by promoting biodiversity and improving overall habitat conditions (Benoit and Askins 1999; OMNR 2011; Greenberg and Green 2013; Perez et al. 2013).
Some management activities, including prescribed burns and herbicides used to control invasive species, such as non-native Common Reed, have the potential to harm some species, at least in the short term. The ecological risks of such activities must be considered individually before undertaking them, in order to reduce possible negative effects. For example, the timing of management activities can be controlled (e.g., prescribed burning in the early spring or other suitable time periods) to minimize effects on amphibians, reptiles, and/or insects.
The SEA concluded that this strategy will clearly benefit the environment and will not entail any significant adverse effects. The reader should refer to the following sections of the provincial document in particular: habitat needs (Part 2, Section 1.4), knowledge gaps (Part 2, Section 1.7), and the government-led and government-supported actions tables from Ontario’s Government Response Statement for The Bent Spikerush (Part 3).
Benoit, L. K. and R. A. Askins. 1999. Impact of the spread of Phragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut marshes. Wetlands 19: 194-208.
Bowles, J.M. 2010. Recovery strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario. Ontario Recovery Strategy Series. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, ON. vi + 17pp.
COSEWIC. 2009. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Bent Spike-rush, Eleocharis geniculata, Great lakes Plains population and Southern Mountain population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. Vii + 30pp.
Government of Canada. 2009. Species at Risk Act Policies, Overarching Policy Framework [Draft]. Species at Risk Act Policy and Guidelines Series. Environment Canada. Ottawa. 38 pp.
Greenberg, D. A. and D.M. Green. 2013. Effects of an invasive plant on population dynamics in toads. Conservation Biology 27: 1049–1057.
Korol, B., pers. comm. 2014. Email correspondence to R. deCatanzaro. September 25 2014. Habitat Biologist, Ecological Gifts Program, Canadian Wildlife Service, Toronto, Ontario.
Lee, H.T., W.D. Bakowsky, J. Riley, J. Bowles, M. Puddister, P. Uhlg and S. McMurray. 1998. Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario: First Approximation and Its Application. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, South Central Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch. SCSS Field Guide FG-02.
NatureServe. 2013. NatureServe Explorer: an online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.[accessed October 2013].
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR). 2011. Invasive Phragmites – Best Management Practices, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. Version 2011. 15 p.
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR). 2012. Habitat Protection Summary for Bent Spike-rush (PDF: 489kb; 2 pages).
Perez, A., M.J. Mazerolle and J. Brisson. 2013. Effects of exotic common reed (Phragmites australis) on wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) tadpole development and food availability. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 28(2):165-177.
Rank Definitions (NatureServe 2013)
|Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata)
|Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata)
|S1 (Critically Imperilled)||Ontario, British Columbia, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, Ohio|
|S1? (Critically Imperilled – inexact rank)||Louisiana|
|S3S4 (Vulnerable-Apparently Secure)||Mississippi|
|SNA (Not Applicable)||Hawaii|
|SNR (Unranked)||Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas|
- Recommended Citation
- Responsible Jurisdrictions
- Executive summary
- 1. Background Information
- 2. Recovery
This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA, 2007) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada.
Recovery of species at risk is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a species’ persistence in the wild.
Under the ESA, 2007, a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to achieve recovery of a species. A recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the survival and recovery of the species. It also makes recommendations on the objectives for protection and recovery, the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation. Sections 11 to 15 of the ESA, 2007 outline the required content and timelines for developing recovery strategies published in this series.
Recovery strategies are required to be prepared for endangered and threatened species within one or two years respectively of the species being added to the Species at Risk in Ontario list. There is a transition period of five years (until June 30, 2013) to develop recovery strategies for those species listed as endangered or threatened in the schedules of the ESA, 2007. Recovery strategies are required to be prepared for extirpated species only if reintroduction is considered feasible.
Nine months after the completion of a recovery strategy a government response statement will be published which summarizes the actions that the Government of Ontario intends to take in response to the strategy. The implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and conservationists.
To learn more about species at risk recovery in Ontario, please visit the Ministry of Natural Resources Species at Risk webpage.
Bowles, J. M. 2010. Recovery strategy for the Bent Spike-rush (Eleocharis geniculata) in Ontario. Ontario Recovery Strategy Series. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. vi + 17 pp.
Cover illustration: Sam Brinker, NHIC
© Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2010
ISBN 978-1-4435-4000-1 (PDF)
Content (excluding the cover illustration) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source.
Cette publication hautement spécialisée Recovery strategies prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007, n’est disponible qu’en Anglais en vertu du Règlement 411/97 qui en exempte l’application de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir de l’aide en français, veuillez communiquer avec Pamela Wesley au ministère des Richesses naturelles au 705-755-1661
Jane M. Bowles, UWO Herbarium, University of Western Ontario
This Recovery Strategy was prepared under contract from the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. The following people have helped with the development of the recovery strategy by providing help and information. Elizabeth Reimer, SAR Intern, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources; Michael Oldham, Botanist, Natural Heritage Information Center and Terry McIntosh, consulting botanist and senior author of the COSEWIC Status Report on Bent Spike-rush all provided information. Steve Matson, CalPhotos allowed the use of his photographs.
The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources has led the development of this recovery strategy for the Bent Spike-rush in accordance with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA 2007). This recovery strategy has been prepared as advice to the Government of Ontario, other responsible jurisdictions and the many different constituencies that may be involved in recovering the species.
The recovery strategy does not necessarily represent the views of all of the individuals who provided advice or contributed to its preparation, or the official positions of the organizations with which the individuals are associated.
The goals, objectives and recovery approaches identified in the strategy are based on the best available knowledge and are subject to revision as new information becomes available. Implementation of this strategy is subject to appropriations, priorities and budgetary constraints of the participating jurisdictions and organizations.
Success in the recovery of this species depends on the commitment and cooperation of many different constituencies that will be involved in implementing the directions set out in this strategy.
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service – Ontario
Bent Spike-rush is a small (2-20 cm tall), annual, tufted plant that grows in open areas on the sheltered shorelines of ponds and lakes. The species is listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA 2007). There are two populations in Ontario. One population is on the shoreline of a dug sand pit in the hamlet of Cedar Springs, in the Municipality of Chatham-Kent. The second, and larger population, is found scattered along the shores of ponds and in shallow interdunal swales near the tip of Long Point, Norfolk County. The total population sizes are estimated at 300-500 at Cedar Springs and 1300 to 2500 at Long Point, although a comprehensive survey has not been carried out at either site. Since the plant is an annual the population of mature individuals likely fluctuates from year to year, and long-term survival of the species depends on dormant seeds stored in the substrate. Little is known about the longevity of the seeds or the size of the seed bank.
The main threat to the species is degradation of habitat as a result of invasion by the introduced and invasive variety of Common Reed (Phragmites australis), commonly referred to as Phragmites. This plant is actively invading many wetlands in southern Ontario and is present at both populations of Bent Spike-rush. Populations of Phragmites on Long Point increased from 18 ha to almost 140 ha between 1995 and 1999, and have increased about five-fold since then. Since Bent Spike-rush requires open strand lines to grow, competition from Phragmites and changes in shoreline dynamics are considered threats, especially where physical changes in the shoreline have been affected by the presence of Phragmites. At Cedar Springs, the population is in a habitat that is at least partly created by humans. The habitat of Bent Spike-rush is currently protected under the ESA 2007.
The recovery goal for Bent Spike-rush is to prevent further loss of habitat within the area of occupancy at both sites where it occurs so that populations are maintained.
The objectives of this recovery strategy are:
- Inventory and map all known Bent Spike-rush locations, populations and habitats by 2015 to provide a quantitative baseline for future monitoring and initiate a monitoring program.
- Monitor populations and extent of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites at regular intervals (at least every 2-3 years) on an on-going basis to provide data on the extent and rate of habitat change.
- Investigate options for removal and/or control of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites that are most vulnerable to this threat. Prepare plans for Phragmites management and begin management by 2012.
- Research the habitat requirements (including hydrologic regime), population biology, dispersal and seed bank dynamics of Bent Spike-rush to determine feasibility of survival, relocation and recovery in protected habitat.
- Provide communication and outreach to landowners, municipalities and planners to restrict habitat destruction by development at the Cedar Springs site. Incorporate specific protection into the next draft of relevant municipal Official Plans.
Approaches to protection and recovery include detailed inventory and mapping of populations and habitats, including the extent of the threat of Phragmites. This will provide baseline data from which the success of recovery actions can be measured. Habitat recovery, restoration and rehabilitation may be achieved through management or removal of Phragmites. Opportunities for Phragmites control need to be investigated and experimental treatments carried out that can be the basis for adaptive management.
It is recommended that the habitat at Long Point be prescribed as habitat for Bent Spike-rush in a habitat regulation. This habitat includes those areas of the North Beach and the shorelines of interdunal ponds and wet meadows between Gravelly Bay and the tip of Long Point that are occasionally or seasonally inundated and that remain moist for most of the growing season, and where the native vegetation that competes with Bent Spike-rush is naturally sparse to open. At Cedar Springs, it is recommended that the graded shoreline of the sand pit be prescribed as habitat for Bent Spike-rush in a habitat regulation.
The glossary provides definitions for the abbreviations above.
Bent Spike-rush is a small plant with densely tufted, green and slightly waxy-looking, threadlike stems 2-20 centimetres long and 0.2-0.5 millimetres in diameter. There are no underground stems (rhizomes). The base of the stem has two pale green sheaths that are often tinged reddish brown in lower part. A single, many-flowered spikelet about 3-7 millimetres long, 3-4 millimetres wide and rounded or slightly pointed is borne at the summit of the flowering stem. The scales of the spikelet are rusty or pale brown, broadly egg-shaped or elliptical, obtuse and about 1.5-2 millimetres long. Flowers are bisexual with both male and female parts. The fruit is a smooth black, glossy, achene about 1 millimetres long and broadly obovoid (egg-shaped, but widest at the top). The achene is surrounded by 6-7 soft, rust-coloured bristles with small barbs on them. The top of each achene is adorned with a wide, flattish, pale green structure known as a tubercle (Menapace 2002) (Figure 1).
Long description for Figure 1
Bent Spike-rush is a pan-tropical wetland species that extends into temperate regions at the edge of its range and typically grows in sand or mud along the shoreline at the edge of lakes, ponds and rivers. It is also found in seeps, salt-marshes, rice paddies and taro fields in the tropics (Menapace 2002). In Ontario it is found on muddy or silty soils at the edge of ephemeral ponds, beaches and wet meadows that are flooded early in the year but later dry out. It appears in places where other vegetation is sparse or absent so that competition from other species is low. Plants mature and set seed in late summer and early autumn, usually around the first week of September in Ontario (COSEWIC 2009).
Plants grow each year from seed deposited the previous year or that are dormant in the seed bank. For annual species, such as Bent Spike-rush, long term persistence depends on seeds stored in the seed bank, with plants growing and setting seed only in years when the conditions are favourable. Dormancy may last for several to many years (COSEWIC 2009). Annual changes in water levels can have a large effect on the area of suitable habitat available from year to year (personal observation), and population sizes may fluctuate considerably (COSEWIC 2009). Population trends can only be established from regular monitoring over several years, but trends may be inferred from the extent of suitable habitat.
Bent Spike-rush has no obvious means of long distance dispersal. Seeds probably fall close to the parent plants or are washed off during rising water levels. Seeds float for a few hours when first released and may get washed along the shoreline. Movement of seeds in mud stuck to the feet of waterfowl was proposed as a mechanism of dispersal by Darwin (1859) and has been demonstrated for other species of Eleocharis (Bell 2000). The scattered distribution of Bent Spike-rush in Ontario, and its absence from some locations with apparently suitable habitat, suggests that dispersal is quite limited.
There are two known extant populations and one known historical population of Bent Spike-rush in Ontario. The first report of Bent Spike-rush in Canada was from Rondeau Provincial Park in 1934 (Taylor, 1935), but the plant has not been found there since despite several searches (COSEWIC 2009). At Long Point it was first observed in 1979 and was reported by Reznicek and Catling (1989) as being “occasional but widespread on beach strands and sandy pond shores between Gravelly Bay and the tip of the Point". Most stands are within the Long Point National Wildlife Area. The Cedar Springs site was discovered in 1996 by M.J. Oldham and A.W. Cusick (COSEWIC 2009). The Rondeau Provincial Park and Long Point sites are along the Lake Erie shoreline while the Cedar Springs location is about 2 kilometres inland on the shoreline of Glacial Lake Warren.
Targeted searches for Bent Spike-rush were conducted at all known Ontario sites in 2007 by T. McIntosh, M.J. Oldham, S. Brinker and A. Reznicek during field work for the COSEWIC Status Report (COSEWIC 2009). The number of mature, fruiting individuals was 300-500 plants at Cedar Springs and 1,000-2,000 at Long Point. At Long Point, stands of Bent Spike-rush were found scattered over an area about 4.4 kilometres long. Not all suitable habitat in the area was searched; abundance estimates were made visually on transects into previously known sites. Estimates of plant numbers were made at locations where GPS waypoints were recorded and inferred from the extent of suitable habitat.
The population at Cedar Springs was not surveyed quantitatively before 2007, but no obvious changes in density or abundance have been noted since it was discovered in 1996 (COSEWIC 2009).
Similarly, no earlier counts of Bent Spike-rush have been made at Long Point. In 2007 the species was absent from several places where it had been present in 1988 or earlier (M. J. Oldham pers. comm. 2009). In some places it was still present, but there seemed to be fewer plants than in previous years. Some sites with suitable habitat in 1988 had grown in with the invasive variety of Common Reed (Phragmites australis), commonly known as Phragmites.
Long description for Figure 2
Bent Spike-rush is limited in Ontario close to the shore of Lake Erie. The specific habitats for Bent Spike-rush are the sheltered shorelines of lakes and ponds on the strand lines at the water and on flat beaches where the water table is close to the surface. Bent Spike-rush usually grows in open areas where other shoreline species are present, but it cannot compete with tall or permanent vegetation such as Phragmites. On a local scale the habitat is usually quite ephemeral, moving back and forth across the shoreline in response to changes in water levels.
There are only two known extant locations for the species in Ontario. At the Cedar Springs location, Bent Spike-rush is found within the boundaries of the hamlet of Cedar Springs. It grows on a sloping shoreline at the edge of an old sand pit on an ancient beach ridge of a glacial lake, and is about 1.7 kilometres inland from the current lakeshore. Associated species include Elliptic Spike-rush (Eleocharis elliptica), Northern Bugleweed (Lycopus uniflorus), Green Sedge (Carex viridula), Greater Canadian St. John’s-wort (Hypericum majus), Phragmites, Small-flowered Agalinis (Agalinis paupercula), Narrowleaf Paleseed (Leucospora multifida), Northern Green-rush (Juncus alpinoarticulatus ssp. nodulosus), Brook Flatsedge (Cyperus bipartitus) and Annual Witchgrass (Panicum capillare) (McIntosh 2007).
At Long Point, Bent Spike-rush grows along the sandy or silty shorelines of ponds in interdunal swales within 5 kilometres of the tip of the point. The area and depth of water in these ponds, and the width of the strand areas, are dependent on the water levels in the ponds. These in turn are related, at least partially, to the water level of Lake Erie, which typically fluctuates about 0.5 metres annually and up to 2 metres on longer-term cycles (NOAA 2009). Typical associated species in the habitat include Elliptic Spike-rush, Low Nutrush (Scleria verticillata), Green Sedge, Horned Beakrush (Rhynchospora capillacea) and Philadelphia Panic Grass (Panicum philadelphicum) in places where there is more than 99 percent bare substrate of silt and organic matter on sand.
Bent Spike-rush is also sometimes found on the open bottom of drying ponds with associates including Annual Witchgrass, Smooth Sawgrass (Cladium mariscoides), Marsh Arrowgrass (Triglochin palustre), Squarestem Spike-rush (Eleocharis quadrangulata), Green Sedge and Horned Bladderwort (Utricularia cornuta). It also occurs in a long, shallow interdunal depression near the south shore of Long Point, south of Gravelly Bay, often with Bright Green Spike-rush (Eleocharis olivacea), which stands out as being less common and larger; Slender Fimbry (Fimbristylis autumnalis), Green Sedge, Horned Beakrush, Smooth Sawgrass and Water Milfoil (Myriophyllum sp.) may also be present. This habitat has large patches of Phragmites invading the site (McIntosh 2007).
The main limiting factor for Bent Spike-rush in Canada is the very specific habitat, with limited geographic distribution, in which it grows. Sheltered shoreline sites have limited distribution in Ontario and are subject to changes in water levels. In years of high water levels, beaches, strands and the shorelines of ponds may be very narrow because part, or even most, of the habitat is under water. There are clearly other (unknown) factors limiting the species because it has very limited occurrence even in habitats that are apparently suitable.
The main threat to Bent Spike-rush in Ontario is invasion of the known sites and areas of suitable habitat by the invasive variety of Phragmites at both Long Point and Cedar Springs (COSEWIC 2009).
The amount of Phragmites is expanding rapidly into the shorelines of ponds where Bent Spike-rush grows. Wilcox et. al. (2003) showed that the area of Phragmites stands on Long Point expanded from 18 hectares in 1995 to 137 hectares in 1999. This exponential expansion is continuing. Data from Phragmites cover estimated in permanent vegetation monitoring plots show that in 2009 the amount of Phragmites was about 5 times greater than in 1999 (Bowles and Bradstreet unpublished data). Growth of Phragmites is known to respond to increased nitrogen in shoreline systems (Silliman and Bertness 2004). Increased nitrogen inputs at Bent Spike-rush habitats may come from agricultural runoff into rivers, and thus the lake, and from atmospheric deposition.
Because the shoreline habitat of Bent Spike-rush is dynamic in nature, changes in lake levels and shoreline dynamics may alter some sites (for example by sand accretion, erosion, flooding) so that they no longer provide suitable habitat. This is a natural and continuing process on Long Point (Reznicek and Catling 1989), but it may be exacerbated by changes in vegetation such as an increase in the population of Phragmites.
At Cedar Springs, there is an additional threat of possible residential development at the site. The site lies within the boundaries of the Hamlet of Cedar Springs in Raleigh Township. The Chatham-Kent Official Plan (2009) allows for residential development and growth within hamlet boundaries, but provides for the protection of significant habitat for endangered and threatened species and adjacent areas.
The most important knowledge gaps for the recovery and protection of Bent Spike-rush in Ontario relate to the extent, size and precise locations of the Long Point population. Observations have been made over the last few decades by knowledgeable individuals familiar with the species, but information from a detailed survey is lacking. The extent of the species in apparently suitable habitats is not known. Some previous locations have been altered by changes in lake level and beach dynamics, and the species may have disappeared from some sites. Invasion by Phragmites is altering the structure and composition of plant communities, including some globally imperilled vegetation types such as the Great Lakes Coastal Meadow Marsh, as well as altering physical and chemical properties of the habitats (Rudrappa et al. 2007). Changes in the population levels and in the extent and quality of habitat for Bent Spike-rush can only be monitored and tracked effectively if baseline levels are known for all known sites. The long-term fate of the habitat (and presumably the species) can only be projected and predicted if the habitats and their dynamics are understood. Another important gap is the response of the species to management of the habitat through control of Phragmites, and whether this is even feasible.
Little is known about the year-to-year fluctuations in the populations of Bent Spike-rush and how, and what, environmental factors affect germination, population numbers and fruiting success. Almost nothing is known about seed dispersal or seed dormancy and seed bank characteristics such as size, longevity and turnover. As an annual species, continued existence of the plant from one year to the next relies entirely on seeds.
To date there have been no recovery actions specific to Bent Spike-rush in Ontario. Surveys by McIntosh, Oldham, Reznicek and Brinker (COSEWIC 2009) have begun to document threats and the decline of Bent Spike-rush in Ontario. The studies showing the increasing threat of Phragmites (Wilcox et al 2003, Bowles and Bradstreet unpublished data) are not specific to Bent Spike-rush habitat.
The recovery goal for Bent Spike-rush is to prevent further loss of habitat within the area of occupancy at both populations where it occurs so that populations are maintained.
The protection and recovery objectives are listed in order of priority in Table 1 below.
|No.||Protection or Recovery Objective|
|1||Inventory and map all known Bent Spike-rush locations, populations and habitats by 2015 to provide a quantitative baseline for future monitoring and initiate a monitoring program.|
|2||Monitor populations and extent of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites at regular intervals (at least every 2-3 years) on an on-going basis to provide data on the extent and rate of habitat change.|
|3||Investigate options for removal and/or control of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites that are most vulnerable to this threat. Prepare plans for Phragmites management and begin management by 2012.|
|4||Research the habitat requirements (including hydrologic regime), population biology, dispersal and seed bank dynamics of Bent Spike-rush to determine feasibility of survival, relocation and recovery in protected habitat.|
|5||Provide communication and outreach to landowners, municipalities and planners to restrict habitat destruction by development at Cedar Springs site. Incorporate specific protection into the next draft of relevant municipal Official Plans.|
The recommended approaches to recovery are listed in Table 2. Short-term and immediate critical actions are inventory and accurate mapping of the populations of the Bent Spike-rush, their habitat, and the populations of Phragmites that threaten the habitat. Controlling Phragmites using an adaptive approach that responds to current wisdom and monitoring the results of on-going trials are necessary long-term actions.
|Protection and Recovery Objective||Relative Priority||Relative Timeframe||Recovery Theme||Approach to Recovery||Threats or Knowledge Gaps Addressed|
|1. Inventory and map all known Bent Spike-rush locations, populations and habitats by 2015 to provide a quantitative baseline for future monitoring and initiate a monitoring program.||Critical||Short-term||Inventory, Monitoring and Assessment||
1.1 Conduct detailed mapping and census of known populations
|1. Inventory and map all known Bent Spike-rush locations, populations and habitats by 2015 to provide a quantitative baseline for future monitoring and initiate a monitoring program.||Critical||On-going||Inventory, Monitoring and Assessment||1.2 Repeat mapping, census and measurements of all known populations (as above) to assess species dynamics over an extended period (10 years)||
|2. Monitor populations and extent of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites at regular intervals (at least every 2-3 years) on an on-going basis to provide data on the extent and rate of habitat change.||Critical||Short-term||Monitoring and Assessment;
2.1 Create detailed maps of extent of Phragmites stands at Bent Spike-rush locations
|3. Investigate options for removal and/or control of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites that are most vulnerable to this threat. Prepare plans for Phragmites management and begin management by 2012.||Critical||Ongoing||Management||
3.1 Investigate Phragmites management options from literature, current practices and knowledgeable individuals.
|3. Investigate options for removal and/or control of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites that are most vulnerable to this threat. Prepare plans for Phragmites management and begin management by 2012.||Critical||Long-term||Management||
3.2 Design and execute experimental management of Phragmites in selected plots
|4. Research the habitat requirements (including hydrologic regime), population biology, dispersal and seed bank dynamics of Bent Spike-rush to determine feasibility of survival, relocation and recovery in protected habitat.||Urgent||Ongoing and long-term||Research||
4.1 Establish research protocols to investigate reproductive and habitat biology of Bent Spike-rush.
|5.Provide communication and outreach to landowners, municipalities and planners to restrict habitat destruction by development at Cedar Springs site. Incorporate specific protection into the next draft of relevant municipal Official Plans.||Urgent||Short-term||Communications and Stewardship||
5.1 Communicate with decision makers at Cedar Springs population.
|Protection or Recovery Objective||Performance Measures|
|Objective 1: Inventory and map all known Bent Spike-rush locations, populations and habitats by 2015 to provide a quantitative baseline for future monitoring and initiate a monitoring program.||
|Objective 2: Monitor populations and extent of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites at regular intervals (at least every 2-3 years) on an on-going basis to provide data on the extent and rate of habitat change.||
|Objective 3: Investigate options for removal and/or control of Phragmites at Bent Spike-rush sites that are most vulnerable to this threat. Prepare plans for Phragmites management and begin management by 2012.||
|Objective 4: Research the habitat requirements (including hydrologic regime), population biology, dispersal and seed bank dynamics of Bent Spike-rush to determine feasibility of survival, relocation and recovery in protected habitat.||
|Objective 5: Provide communication and outreach to landowners, municipalities and planners to restrict habitat destruction by development at Cedar Springs site. Incorporate specific protection into the next draft of relevant municipal Official Plans.||
Under the ESA 2007, a recovery strategy must include a recommendation to the Minister of Natural Resources on the area that should be considered in developing a habitat regulation. A habitat regulation is a legal instrument that prescribes an area that will be protected as the habitat of the species. The recommendation provided below by the author will be one of many sources considered by the Minister when developing the habitat regulation for this species.
Bent Spike-rush is an annual species with, presumably, fluctuating populations of mature plants. It grows in a narrow range of specific habitat that may move from year to year in response to fluctuating water levels. The extent of the specific habitat may vary depending on year-to-year changes in water level, the physical properties of the systems such as slope of the land, deposition of sand during storm events and the amount of competition from other plants.
It is recommended that at Long Point, the areas of the North Beach and the shorelines of interdunal ponds and wet meadows between Gravelly Bay and the tip of Long Point be prescribed as habitat for Bent Spike-rush in a habitat regulation. This should only include those areas that are inundated seasonally or by fluctuating lake levels and that remain moist for most of the growing season, and where the native vegetation that competes with Bent Spike-rush is naturally sparse to open. Specific sites may expand, contract and move according to lake levels and changes in dune dynamics. There is a high probability that additional stands of Bent Spike-rush may be found through this area since populations of Bent Spike-rush fluctuate, the species is relatively inconspicuous, and detailed botanical surveys have not been done in all locations. It is also recommended that accurate inventory and mapping of these habitats on Long Point be conducted to support the habitat regulation.
At Cedar Springs, Bent Spike-rush grows in a habitat that is formed by human activity. The species is found on the graded shoreline of a pond formed in a dug sand pit. It is recommended that the graded shoreline of the sand pit be prescribed as habitat for Bent Spike-rush in a habitat regulation.
Bell, D.M. 2000. Dispersal of Eleocharis seeds by birds. The Australian Society for Limnology Conference. Darwin N.T.
Chatham-Kent Official Plan (2009). Turning Vision into Reality. Municipality of Chatham Kent, Civic Centre, Chatham Ontario. 53 pp.
COSEWIC 2009. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Bent Spike-rush Eleocharis geniculata, Great Lake Plains population and Southern Mountain population , in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa vii + 30 pp
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by means of natural selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray. London. 490 pp.
Menapace, F.J. 2002. Eleocharis R. Brown (subg. Eleocharis sect. Eleogenus) ser. Maculosae. Pp. 100-102 in: Flora of North America Volume 23, Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Cyperaceae. Oxford University Press, New York.
McIntosh, T. 2007. Ontario notes re Eleocharis geniculata search, September 2007. Personal communication to M.J. Oldham, September 2007. 3 pp + photographs.
NOAA 2009. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Great Lake Environmental Research Laboratory. Water Level Plots – Lake Erie.
Oldham, M.J. 2009. Personal Communication. E-mail correspondence with Jane Bowles, November 2009.
Reznicek, A.A. and P.M. Catling. 1989. Flora of Long Point, Regional Municipality of Haldimand-Norfolk, Ontario. Michigan Botanist 28(3): 99-175.
Rudrappa, T, J. Bonsall, J. L. Gallagher, D.M. Seliskar & H.P. Bais. 2007. Root-secreted Allelochemical in the Noxious Weed Phragmites Australis Deploys a Reactive Oxygen Species Response and Microtubule Assembly Disruption to Execute Rhizotoxicity. Journal of Chemical Ecology 33: 1898–1918.
Silliman, B.R. and M.D. Bertness 2004. Shoreline Development Drives Invasion of Phragmites australis and the Loss of Plant Diversity on New England Salt Marshes. Conservation Biology, 18(5): 1424–1434.
Taylor, T.M.C. 1935. Eleocharis caribaea var. dispar in Ontario. Rhodora 37: 365-366.
Wilcox, K.L., S.A. Petrie, L.A. Maynard, and S.W. Meyer. 2003. Historical distribution and abundance of Phragmites australis at Long Point, Lake Erie, Ontario. Journal of Great Lakes Research 29(4): 664-680.
Species at risk recovery is a key part of protecting Ontario’s biodiversity. Biodiversity – the variety of life on Earth – provides us with clean air and water, food, fibre, medicine and other resources that we need to survive.
The Endangered Species Act, 2007 (ESA) is the Government of Ontario’s legislative commitment to protecting and recovering species at risk and their habitats. As soon as a species is listed as extirpated, endangered or threatened under the ESA, it is automatically protected from harm or harassment. Also, immediately upon listing, the habitats of endangered and threatened species are protected from damage or destruction.
Under the ESA, the Ministry of Natural Resources (the Ministry) must ensure that a recovery strategy is prepared for each species that is listed as endangered or threatened. A recovery strategy provides science-based advice to government on what is required to achieve recovery of a species.
Within nine months after a recovery strategy is prepared, the ESA requires the Ministry to publish a statement summarizing the government’s intended actions and priorities in response to the recovery strategy. The recovery strategy for Bent Spike-rush was completed on September 10, 2010.
The response statement is the government’s policy response to the scientific advice provided in the recovery strategy. In addition to the strategy, the response statement is based on input from stakeholders, other jurisdictions, Aboriginal communities and members of the public. It reflects the best available traditional, local and scientific knowledge at this time and may be modified if new information becomes available. In implementing the actions in the response statement, the ESA allows the Ministry to determine what is feasible, taking into account social and economic factors.
Bent Spike-rush is listed as an endangered species under the ESA, which protects both the plant and its habitat. The ESA prohibits harm to or harassment of the species and damage to or destruction of its habitat without authorization. Such authorization would require that conditions established by the Ministry be met.
There are two populations of Bent Spike-rush in Ontario, both within two kilometres of Lake Erie. The greatest threat to the plant is habitat degradation caused by the spread of an invasive species called Common Reed (Phragmites australis). Common Reed is actively invading many wetlands in southern Ontario and is present at both locations of Bent Spike-rush.
The government’s goal for the recovery of Bent Spike-rush is to prevent further loss and degradation of habitat at both locations where it occurs so that populations are maintained.
Protecting and recovering species at risk is a shared responsibility. No single agency or organization has the knowledge, authority or financial resources to protect and recover all of Ontario’s species at risk. Successful recovery requires intergovernmental co-operation and the involvement of many individuals, organizations and communities.
In developing the government response statement, the Ministry considered what actions are feasible for the government to lead directly and what actions are feasible for the government’s conservation partners to undertake with government support.
To help protect and recover Bent Spike-rush, the government will directly undertake the following actions:
- Finalize the best management practices for the control of Common Reed within sensitive habitats and update them as new control techniques become available.
- Educate other agencies and authorities involved in planning and environmental assessment processes on the protection requirements under the ESA.
- Encourage the submission of Bent Spike-rush data to the Ministry’s central repository at the Natural Heritage Information Centre.
- Undertake communications and outreach to increase public awareness of species at risk in Ontario.
- Protect Bent Spike-rush and its habitat through the ESA. Develop and enforce a regulation prescribing the habitat of the species.
- Support conservation, agency, municipal and industry partners in undertaking activities to protect and recover Bent Spike-rush. Support will be provided through funding, agreements, permits (including conditions) and advisory services.
- Establish and communicate annual priority actions for government support in order to encourage collaboration and reduce duplication of effort.
The government endorses the following actions for the protection and recovery of Bent Spike-rush. Actions identified as "high" will be given priority consideration for funding or for authorizations under the ESA. The government will focus its support on these high-priority actions over the next five years.
Focus Area: Threat Management
Objective: Investigate and implement options for removing and/or controlling Common Reed at Bent Spike-rush sites that are most vulnerable to this threat.
- 1. (HIGH) Implement the best management practices for Common Reed through an adaptive management approach that assesses their impact on Bent Spike-rush in test plots prior to broader implementation.
Focus Area: Inventory and Monitoring
Objective: Inventory and map all known Bent Spike-rush populations and habitats at regular intervals to provide data on the extent and rate of change.
- 2. Conduct detailed mapping and surveys of known populations to provide a quantitative baseline for future monitoring. This inventory should include:
- an estimate of the population abundance, including the seed bank;
- GPS-based mapping of the population extent of Bent Spike-rush and Common Reed;
- a detailed inventory of the species present in the vegetation community; and
- measurements of water and moisture levels.
- 3. Repeat the inventory and mapping of all known populations to assess species dynamics over an extended period and response to threat-mitigation actions.
Focus Area: Research
Objective: Improve knowledge of the species’ biology to help inform future recovery efforts.
- 4. Conduct research to assess the reproductive and habitat needs of Bent Spike-rush and the magnitude of impacts on these factors by Common Reed.
Financial support for the implementation of actions may be available through the Species at Risk Stewardship Fund, Species at Risk Farm Incentive Program or Community Fisheries and Wildlife Involvement Program. Conservation partners are encouraged to discuss project proposals related to the actions in this response statement with the Ministry. The Ministry can also advise if any authorizations under the ESA may be required to undertake the project.
Implementation of the actions may be subject to changes in priorities across the multitude of species at risk, availability of resources and the capacity of partners to undertake recovery activities. Where appropriate, the implementation of actions for multiple species will be co-ordinated across government response statements.
The ESA requires the Ministry to conduct a review of progress toward protecting and recovering a species not later than five years from the publication of this response statement. The review will help determine whether adjustments are needed to achieve the protection and recovery of Bent Spike-rush.
We would like to thank all those who participated in the development of the "Recovery Strategy for the Bent Spike-rush in Ontario" for their dedication to protecting and recovering species at risk.
Visit the species at risk website
Contact your MNR district office
Contact the Natural Resources Information Centre
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: