Overview of the Conservation Implementation Plan for the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place
Alternate format
Document information
Cat. No.: CW66-1585/2-2025E-PDF
ISBN: 978-0-660-75037-8
EC24037
Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce materials in this publication, in whole or in part, for the purposes of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from Environment and Climate Change Canada’s copyright administrator. To obtain permission to reproduce Government of Canada materials for commercial purposes, apply for Crown Copyright Clearance by contacting:
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Public Information Centre
Place Vincent Massey building
351 St-Joseph Boulevard
Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0H3
Toll free: 1-800-668-6767
Email: enviroinfo@ec.gc.ca
Front page image copyright: Long Point Walsingham Forest Landscape © Jason Read; Wild Lupine © Nature Conservancy of Canada; Mottled Duskywing butterfly © Jessica Linton; Spiny Softshell turtle © Scott D. Gillingwater.
© His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, 2025
Aussi disponible en français
Land acknowledgement
We recognize that the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place is situated upon the Treaty Lands and Territory of the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation and the Traditional Territory of the Haudenosaunee and Huron-Wendat. We recognize and acknowledge the continued impacts of colonialism and residential schools that disrupted Indigenous Peoples relationships with the lands. Southern Ontario is home to many First Nations and Métis Peoples and through this acknowledgement it is our intent to show respect for the people who have stewarded these lands and waters since time immemorial and those who continue to care for them. Through this acknowledgement, we are reminded of our connection to this land and commit ourselves to learn and work together in the spirit of reconciliation.
Acknowledgements
The Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place is part of the Norfolk County community. It is a working landscape that provides for the community. Agricultural livelihoods are an important value which is recognized and considered through the Priority Place work.
We would like to thank all members of the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place Collaborative and funders for their contributions to this initiative. Because of their efforts, a great deal of work has been accomplished in this Priority Place, resulting in conservation actions that benefit species at risk and other wildlife, such as migratory birds.
Much of this document includes material from the Long Point Walsingham Forest: Conservation Implementation Plan (2018-2026). Many people contributed to the conceptualization and writing of that plan and are thanked for their efforts. The Long Point Walsingham Forest Situation Analysis contains a complete list of contributors. The following organizations are acknowledged and thanked for their significant input into the completion and writing of the implementation plan:
ALUS Norfolk Inc.
ALUS Partnership Advisory Committee
Birds Canada
Carolinian Canada Coalition
Delta Waterfowl
Ducks Unlimited Canada
Eco-Kare International
Forest Gene Conservation Association
Long Point Basin Land Trust
Long Point Region Conservation Authority
Long Point World Biosphere Reserve Foundation
Natural Resource Solutions Inc.
Nature Conservancy of Canada
Norfolk County
Ontario Fruit and Vegetable Growers Association
Ontario Ginseng Growers Association
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Agribusiness
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
Ontario Nature
Ontario Plant Restoration Alliance
Ontario Road Ecology Group
Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association
Pterophylla Farm
St. Williams Conservation Reserve
Tallgrass Ontario
Introduction
Pan-Canadian approach to transforming species at risk conservation in Canada
Canada’s biodiversity is a cornerstone of our way of life. As human impact on the planet grows, more habitat is lost and more species are at risk of extinction. We need to take innovative action to protect and recover the animals, plants, and places we love. The Pan-Canadian Approach to Transforming Species at Risk Conservation in Canada (Pan-Canadian Approach) shifts from single-species approaches to conservation to approaches that focus on multiple species and ecosystems. Focusing our effort in specific locations with high biodiversity and concentrations of species at risk helps conserve habitat that benefits many species at the same time. It also brings together partners with common goals to improve collaboration and promote shared leadership. Through partnership, we will work to achieve sustainable protection and recovery of species at risk.
Important principles guide collaborative work under the Pan-Canadian Approach:
- shared priorities and leadership
- Indigenous engagement
- strengthened evidence-base for decision making
- aligned investments
We identify priorities using defined criteria, followed by:
- cooperative action planning
- investment and implementation of actions
- monitoring and reporting of results
The results and benefits of action under the Pan-Canadian Approach are:
- better conservation outcomes for more species at risk
- improved return on investment
- increased co-benefits for biodiversity and ecosystems
Priority places for species at risk
Under this approach, 12 Priority Places have been selected across Canada. These places have significant biodiversity, high concentrations of species at risk, and opportunities to advance conservation efforts. In each Priority Place, the federal and provincial or territorial governments are working with Indigenous peoples, organizations and partners to develop conservation implementation plans.
As a whole, Priority Places have a higher percentage of private land than the rest of Canada and socio-economic activities are present on the landscape. We recognize the importance of stewardship by private landowners to the conservation of species at risk in these places and the need to work more broadly to identify conservation opportunities on those lands; we welcome new opportunities for collaboration with interested parties.
The Priority Places are at different stages of cooperative planning and implementation of conservation actions under the Pan-Canadian Approach. In many of these areas, important conservation work has been ongoing for a long time and in some of these places collaborative approaches and conservation planning were already underway before they were chosen as Priority Places. Other Priority Places are new initiatives and are in earlier stages of engagement and collaborative conservation planning. All of these Priority Places build on existing work by implementing coordinated, multi-partner conservation actions in these places, but there is no one size fits all approach to collaborative planning across these diverse places. To learn more about the Priority Places initiative and the work undertaken by our partners to recover species at risk within these Priority Places, please visit our interactive website.
Conservation implementation planning in Long Point Walsingham Forest
In Ontario, the Priority Place Initiative is being implemented by the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place Collaborative (the Collaborative). The Collaborative is a partnership of non-government and government organizations that aims to improve biodiversity conservation in Long Point Walsingham Forest through the coordinated identification and implementation of priority conservation actions. The Collaborative may grow as the Conservation Implementation Plan (CIP) is further developed. Subset committees of the Collaborative called “Working Groups” have also been formed for the purpose of collaborating on planning and implementation of priority strategies as outlined in the CIP.
The Collaborative is using Conservation Standards as a framework for collaborative action planning. This internationally recognized tool helps conservation teams provide a clear, systematic approach to designing, managing, implementing, monitoring, and adapting conservation efforts.
This document presents an overview of the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place and a summary of the planning that guides the implementation of conservation work there. This document may be updated as work in the Priority Place continues to evolve. You can find more information on the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place and the completed Conservation Implementation Plan here:
- Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place website
- Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place Conservation Implementation Plan
- Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place Situation Analysis
This document does not replace action plans or management plans under the Species at Risk Act, nor does it replace Ontario action plans, legislation or regulations.
Conservation actions in the Priority Places are funded by multiple federal, provincial, and municipal government and non-government partners, including contributions under the Canada Nature Fund and Enhanced Nature Legacy. All strategies that may benefit species at risk conservation in the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place are incorporated into the collaborative planning process. However, the implementation of strategies is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints of the participating jurisdictions and organizations.
Long Point Walsingham Forest priority place
Size: ~90,000 hectares
Description: Carolinian Life Zone along the northern shores of Lake Erie in Norfolk County, Southwestern Ontario
Ecosystem Composition:
- 47% agricultural lands
- 17% forest cover
- 16% wetland cover
- <1% tallgrass prairie savanna and woodland
- <1 % beaches and coastal dunes
The Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place was selected as a Priority Place in 2017. It includes the Long Point sand spit and the Norfolk Forest Complex. It is in the Carolinian Life Zone. This Zone makes up less than 1% of Canada’s total land area but has a greater number of species than any other vegetation zone in Canada.
Historically the landscape was covered by a mosaic of oak savannah, sand barrens, Carolinian forests, and wetlands. However, during the 19th century much of Norfolk County was cleared for timber and agricultural production, resulting in widespread erosion and topsoil loss that eventually led to many lands becoming unfit for agriculture. Restoration of the landscape began in the early 20th century. Today, agricultural productivity has returned and the area maintains relatively high natural cover as compared to the rest of southwestern Ontario.
This Priority Place is home to plants and animals of the Carolinian Life Zone, many of which are provincially, nationally and globally rare. There are 88 species at risk and more than 64,000 hectares of non-overlapping critical habitat in Long Point Walsingham Forest.
Located along the Atlantic flyway, hundreds of thousands of birds visit Long Point every year, representing 75% of all migrating birds in Ontario. Over 400 different species have been recorded at Long Point, 80 of which breed there.
The Long Point Peninsula and Marshes is one of the most important waterfowl staging areas in North America. It is recognized as an Important Bird Area for its globally significant numbers of both waterfowl and landbirds. Daily counts of waterfowl at Long Point can reach 100,000 during migration periods.
Long description
A map of the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place, located in Southern Ontario on the coast of Lake Erie.
Vision statement
Healthy, resilient and connected ecosystems that support biodiversity, productive landscapes and a thriving community.
Conservation targets
A conservation target is an element of biodiversity (species, habitat, or ecological system) on which a project is focused in an area. The six main conservation targets for Long Point Walsingham Forest are:
Long description
A series of 6 images representing each of the conservation targets for Long Point Walsingham Forest: Coastal wetlands and inner bay, Forests and treed swamps, Amphibians and reptiles, Watercourses and riparian areas, Open country, Beaches and coastal dunes.
The following goals were developed for each conservation target using key ecological attributes from the Viability Assessment (see Situation Analysis).
| Number | Goals | Conservation targets |
|---|---|---|
1. |
By 2025, 90% of the vegetation in the Coastal Wetlands and Beaches and Coastal Dunes ecosystems is native. |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Beaches and Coastal Dunes |
2. |
Maintain existing 2018 Forests and Treed Swamps cover and where possible increase/improve interior forest habitat and connectivity through additional forested acreage and forested corridors by 2050. |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
3. |
Maintain and improve the riparian zone so that 75% is vegetated with native plants. |
Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
4. |
By 2025, at least 50% of surface water samples meet the provincial water quality objective for phosphorus (0.03 mg/L for streams and rivers). |
Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
5. |
Reduce wildlife road mortality by enhancing road infrastructure to facilitate safe movement of wildlife across the landscape. |
Amphibians and Reptiles |
6. |
Maintain existing Open Country habitat and restore additional areas, prioritizing sites where: existing habitat patches can be increased in size, habitat patches >=5 ha can be created, patch connectivity is best achieved and/or there are opportunities for long-term management. |
Open Country |
7. |
By 2030, 30% of the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place is conserved and protected. |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Beaches and Coastal Dunes Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas Forests and Treed Swamps Amphibians and Reptiles |
Current work in this Priority Place focuses on reducing threats to the conservation targets.
Pressures
Direct pressures or threats to the conservation targets in Long Point Walsingham Forest were identified and assessed based on their scope or extent, the severity of their impact, and the degree to which their impacts are reversible. An internationally recognized standard for direct threats is used to the extent possible (International Union for Conservation of Nature – Conservation Measures Partnership; IUCN-CMP); some threat names have been adjusted to make them more applicable to the pressures present in Long Point Walsingham Forest (Table 1). The Long Point Walsingham Forest strategies address the following critical pressures: invasive species; fire suppression; roads; agricultural runoff; logging and wood harvesting; and housing and urban areas.
This assessment rated pressures or threats at an ecosystem level within the scope of the Priority Place, and so the outcome may differ from that of species-specific threat assessments found in other documents (for example COSEWIC status reports or SARA Recovery Strategies).
Climate-Smart conservation
Climate change is a significant pressure to biodiversity and species at risk in Priority Places. The current and projected impacts of climate change add additional stress to conservation targets. These include but are not limited to shifting and changing seasons, severe weather events including changes in precipitation, shifting species and ecosystems and potentially exacerbating other pressures and creating new ones. Instead of treating climate change as a direct pressure, the Priority Place is working towards incorporating climate change into all aspects of conservation planning and adaptive management. Many conservation organizations are starting to adopt this “climate-smart conservation” approach. This includes using climate scenario planning to consider the potential impacts of climate change on ecosystems and species, anticipating and managing for change, being adaptable to adjusting strategies and goals, and integrating climate adaptation into conservation actions.
| Threats/ Pressures | Icon | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 Housing and Urban Areas | ![]() |
Medium |
| 1.2 Commercial and Industrial Areas | ![]() |
Low |
| 1.3 Tourism and Recreation Areas | ![]() |
Low |
| 4.1 Roads | ![]() |
Medium |
| 4.2 Utility and Service Lines | ![]() |
Low |
| 5.1 Hunting and Collecting Terrestrial Animals | ![]() |
Low |
| 5.2 Gathering Terrestrial Plants | ![]() |
Low |
| 5.3 Logging and Wood Harvesting | ![]() |
Low |
| 5.4 Fishing and Harvesting Aquatic Resources | ![]() |
Low |
| 6.1 Recreation Activities | ![]() |
Low |
| 7.1 Fire Suppression | ![]() |
High |
| 7.2 Dams and Water Management/Use | ![]() |
Medium |
| 7.3 Shoreline Hardening and Beach Modifications | ![]() |
Low |
| 8.1 Invasive Species | ![]() |
High |
| 8.2 Problematic Native Plants and Animals | ![]() |
Medium |
| 8.4 Pathogens and Microbes | ![]() |
Low |
| 9.1 Household Sewage and Urban Waste Water | ![]() |
Low |
| 9.3 Agricultural Runoff (point and non-point source) | ![]() |
Medium |
| 9.4 Garbage and Solid Waste | ![]() |
Low |
| 9.5 Air-borne Pollutants | ![]() |
Low |
| 9.6 Light and Noise Pollution | ![]() |
Low |
| 11.3, 11.4, and 11.5 Climate Change and Severe Weather | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Low |
Graphic summary
Long description
Figure 2 shows a graphic summary of the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place Conservation Implementation Plan (illustration created by Emma Richard, 2023). It includes the vision statement, conservation targets, human wellbeing targets, and threats and strategies. The vision statement is "healthy, resilient and connected ecosystems that support biodiversity, productive landscapes and a thriving community," and keywords alongside the vision statement are : stewardship, collaboration, species at risk, and biodiversity. The conservation targets are: Beaches and coastal dunes, Amphibians and reptiles, Coastal wetlands and inner bay, Watercourses and riparian areas, Forests and treed swamps, and Open country. The human wellbeing targets are Agriculture livelihoods and Connection to nature. For the threat of Invasive species (Phragmites Australis) the strategies from the Conservation Implementation plan are: strategy 1 - site specific control, strategy 2 - upper watershed control, strategy 3 - develop ecosystem recovery guidance and strategy 16 - manage habitat using BMPs. For the threat of Roads to Amphibians and Reptiles, the strategies are: strategy 4 - increase awareness, strategy 5 - incorporate mitigation policy, and strategy 6 - install and maintain mitigation infrastructure. For the threat of Fire suppression in tallgrass communities, the strategies are: strategy 7 - maintain geospatial database, strategy 8 - restore and improve habitat, strategy 9 - increase awareness and strategy 10 - support landowners. For the threat of Agricultural runoff, the strategies are: strategy 11 - restore and maintain natural features and strategy 12 - promote agriculture BMPs with incentives. For the threat of Logging and wood harvesting, the only strategy is strategy number 13 - manage forest connectivity and diversity. And finally, for threat of Housing and urban area, the strategies are strategy 14 - acquire significant land, and strategy 15 - develop natural heritage system.
Situation analysis
A situation analysis helps to create a common understanding of the project’s context – describing the relationships between the biological environment and the social, economic, political, and institutional systems and drivers that affect the conservation targets. By understanding this context, the team is better informed to select strategies that will achieve their goals and objectives. A situation analysis helps answer two key questions: “What factors positively and negatively affect our targets?” and “Who are the key stakeholders linked to each of these factors?” The following situation model is a visual diagram of the situation analysis. It illustrates key factors and causal chains that affect the conservation targets.
Long description
Figure 2 shows a situation Analysis for the Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place. It includes strategies, contributing factors, direct threats, conservation targets, ecosystem services, and human well-being targets.
(Corresponding) Strategies |
Contributing Factors |
Critical Threats (Direct Threats) |
Direct Threats |
Conservation Targets with Indicator Ratings |
Ecosystem Services |
Human Well-being Targets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Strategy 11 |
|
High pressure:
Medium pressure:
Low pressure:
|
Medium pressure:
Low pressure:
Not Specified:
|
Very Good:
Good:
Fair:
|
|
|
Strategy 12 |
||||||
Strategy 7 |
|
|||||
Strategy 8 |
||||||
Strategy 9 |
||||||
Strategy 10 |
||||||
Strategy 1 |
|
|||||
Strategy 2 |
||||||
Strategy 3 |
||||||
Strategy 16 |
||||||
Strategy 4 |
|
|||||
Strategy 5 |
||||||
Strategy 6 |
||||||
Strategy 13 |
|
|||||
Strategy 14 |
|
|||||
Strategy 15 |
Key strategies
In order to achieve the conservation target goals identified above, the following strategies and actions should be implemented. The short-term objectives are identified in order to measure progress towards achieving the longer-term goals.
Strategy 1: Plan and conduct site specific control of Phragmites australis at Long Point coastal wetlands.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay, Beaches and Coastal Dunes
Direct threat(s) addressed: Invasive Species
Actions:
- Utilize an integrated pest management approach using a combination of management methods
- Collaborate with regulatory agencies
- Document re-establishment of phragmites in treated areas to inform follow-up treatment
- Obtain necessary authorizations from regulatory agencies
- Coordinate mapping to track and monitor efficacy
- Conduct ecological monitoring
- Prioritize areas for management
- Explore best practices for alternative management methods and new/emerging techniques
- Conduct outreach to key stakeholders to identify new partners and maintain existing support
- Conduct First Nations engagement sessions to share information and knowledge
- Support training of licensed contractors and local individuals
- Apply for all required federal and provincial permits (for example, SARA, CWA, DFO)
- Obtain contractors for implementation and monitoring
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
1.0: Maintain Phragmites australis cover in the Long Point Coastal Wetlands to <10%Footnote 1 |
|
1.1: A funded and coordinated Phragmites management program is implemented on the Long Point and Big Creek National Wildlife Areas annually from 2019-2025. |
|
1.2: Evaluate native vegetation recovery capacity. |
|
1.3: Evaluate effects of treatment on wetland biota habitat use. |
|
Strategy 2: Plan and conduct Phragmites australis management within the Big Creek watershed to reduce spread into the Long Point coastal wetlands.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay, Beaches and Coastal Dunes, Watercourses and Riparian Areas, Forests and Treed Swamps
Direct threat(s) addressed: Invasive Species
Actions:
- Develop a watershed engagement plan for managing Phragmites
- Mobilize landowners and the general public to monitor and manage Phragmites
- Prioritize areas in the Big Creek watershed to treat
- Provide training materials to heavy machinery operators and construction companies on clean equipment protocols
- Work with Norfolk County to control Phragmites on roadside and drainage ditches
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
2.0: By 2024, key Phragmites australis propagule sources in the Big Creek watershed are managed. |
|
Strategy 3: Develop policy guidance that supports ecosystem restoration for Species at Risk.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay, Beaches and Coastal Dunes
Direct threat(s) addressed: Invasive Species
Actions:
- Ensure resource managers can make practical decision around urgent stewardship actions which halt the degradation of Critical Habitat quality and the wildlife it supports
- Review permit applications with recognition of the urgent need and benefits to SAR as part of approved wildlife management plans
- Conduct habitat restoration and improvement in SAR habitat
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
3.0: Phragmites australis is effectively managed in SAR critical habitat at the Long Point and Big Creek National Wildlife Areas by 2022. |
|
Strategy 4: Increase awareness on the threat of roads to wildlife and engage the local community in stewardship efforts.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Amphibians and Reptiles
Direct threat(s) addressed: Roads
Actions:
- Conduct local community stewardship events and workshops
- Inform motorists when and how to modify behaviour
- Install MTO wildlife mortality awareness signs at priority hotspots
- Initiate a citizen science data collection program at potential future mitigation sites
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
4.0: By 2020, citizen scientists are submitting road mortality observations in Norfolk County to the iNaturalist ‘Citizen Science Data Collection in Norfolk County’ project or the ‘Wildlife on Roads in Ontario’ project and observations/people contributing increases each year. |
|
4.1: By 2023, 5 public engagement events on road ecology have occurred. |
|
4.2: By 2023, at least 75% of the 30,277 Norfolk County households have been made aware of the threats of roads to reptiles and amphibians and the solutions to mitigate road mortality. |
|
Strategy 5: Incorporate road ecology mitigation policy and guidelines in the Norfolk County Official Plan and Road Asset Management Plan.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Amphibians and Reptiles
Direct threat(s) addressed: Roads
Actions:
- Norfolk County staff present a road ecology mitigation policy and guidelines report to council
- Lunch and learn workshops are delivered to Norfolk County Council to provide support and education on wildlife/road mitigation
- Norfolk County staff develop amendments to the Official Plan that integrate and support implementation of road ecology mitigation measures
- Provide Norfolk County staff with the information and resources required to mitigate the threat of roads to wildlife
- Identify and contact key Norfolk County staff to establish a partnership
- Develop and distribute an electronic road ecology resource folder for Norfolk County staff which includes a road mortality hot spot map
- Host a planning/road management/road ecology workshop for Norfolk County staff
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
5.0: By 2025, Norfolk County council has reviewed at least 1 municipal staff recommended report about the threat of roads to SAR herpetofauna and road ecology mitigation principles and practices. |
|
5.1: At the next Official Plan review (2021), road ecology mitigation policy amendments are consolidated into the Official Plan. |
|
Strategy 6: Install and maintain dedicated road mitigation infrastructure for Species at Risk amphibians and reptiles.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Amphibians and Reptiles
Direct threat(s) addressed: Roads
Actions:
- Identify road projects scheduled to take place in SAR herpetofauna hotspots in Norfolk County
- Consolidate all relative information (Natural Heritage System maps/land use schedules from the Official Plan, SAR herpetofauna hotspots, wildlife corridors, and scheduled road projects)
- For every current, planned and future road project, follow an assessment process to determine if the site is a wildlife corridor/crossing hotspot, and integrate standard and widely accepted mitigation measures efficiently and cost effectively as required
- Plan and design roads using best management practices and existing guidance to avoid and minimize threats to SAR and the surrounding environment through any required processes
- Install/implement temporary mitigation strategies at sites where permanent mitigation infrastructure is scheduled to be built
- Maintain and upgrade wildlife mitigation infrastructure (that is, fencing and culverts that were put in place for the purpose of mitigation)
- Maintain and upgrade road culverts that are considered wildlife corridors
- Collaborate with scientists to rigorously and opportunistically collect wildlife/road interaction data
- Augment mitigation with accessory conservation initiatives (for example habitat creation, and public awareness campaigns)
- Monitor effectiveness of mitigation infrastructure
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
6.0: By 2021, Norfolk County road managers consider SAR herpetofauna habitat for all road projects that are scheduled. |
|
6.1: By 2025, a report with proposed road ecology amendments to the Norfolk County Official Plan is presented to council. |
|
6.2: By 2026, Norfolk County plans, installs, monitors and maintains dedicated wildlife/road mitigation infrastructure at priority hotspots. |
|
Strategy 7: Maintain a geospatial database for tallgrass habitat with information on management and monitoring activities.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Open Country
Direct threat(s) addressed: Fire Suppression in Tallgrass Communities
Actions:
- Compile all existing databases and mapping of Open Country habitats, including Ecological Land Classification (ELC) Community Class mapping and historical data into a shareable database
- Identify priority areas for ground-truthing and those that have adequate data
- Compile and track timeline of management activities associated with each site
- Complete field work to apply ELC to Open Country habitats, complete botanical inventories, complete bird surveys, and document candidate areas for prescribed fire
- Identify areas with fire-responsive invasive species and other invasive species pressures
- Identify sites with sensitive non-mobile species
- Prepare list of tallgrass indicator species by ELC polygon
- Prepare list of rare or sensitive species (to fire or other management) by ELC polygon
- Identify high-risk, no burn areas (for example buildings, fuel-loaded areas, etc.)
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
7.0: Develop a shareable database linked to the Long Point Walsingham Forest Shared Geospatial Conservation Database to track monitoring results with a focus on problematic invasive species, key tallgrass habitat indicator species, overall biodiversity, and management activities. |
|
7.1: By 2021, map (and ground-truth where necessary) tallgrass habitat. |
|
Strategy 8: Implement a landscape-level Open Country habitat management plan to restore and maintain Open Country habitat on private and public lands.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Open Country
Direct threat(s) addressed: Fire Suppression in Tallgrass Communities
Actions:
- Identify key stakeholders (land managers, landowners, conservation organizations etc.) to form an implementation team
- Identify a lead for the working group to organize communication among stakeholders, compile input/resources and coordinate the formulation and implementation of a management plan
- Identify habitat creation targets for different Open Country community types
- Develop a landscape-level Open Country habitat management plan which includes:
- Description and mapping of existing Open Country communities, landscape-level habitat connectivity, and sites suitable for habitat restoration and improvement;
- Recommendations for the proportion of different successional stages within the landscape (for example, X number of ha should be maintained as tallgrass prairie, X number of ha should be maintained as savanna, etc.);
- Identification of high-priority management needs (for example, sites where canopy closure threatens Open Country communities, invasive species are prevalent, etc.);
- Identification of site-specific habitat management objectives, prescriptions and cycles (for example, Property A should be maintained as oak savanna through prescribed fire every 10-15 years);
- Identification of existing natural and required fire breaks;
- Identification of existing and desired habitat linkages;
- Specific areas where Open Country habitat patches can be increased in overall size identified;
- Recommendations for short and long-term monitoring; and
- Recommendations for seed collection and assisted dispersal
- Conduct prescribed burns and/or use other management techniques (for example, mowing) at existing, improved and restored sites
- Create/take advantage of natural fire breaks (for example, vegetation gaps, removal of fuel, rivers etc.) when conducting prescribed burns
- Update tracking databases (for example, the Long Point Walsingham Forest Shared Geospatial Conservation Database) as required
- Implement monitoring activities at restored and existing sites
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
8.0: By 2023, a landscape level Open Country habitat management plan is being implemented. |
|
8.1: Improve and restore 250 ha of Open Country habitat on private and public lands by 2023 in a manner that focuses on creating new habitat patches >5 ha where possible. |
|
8.2: Implement monitoring plans to assess the success of restoration efforts focused on Open Country habitat indicator species, SAR, and overall biodiversity. |
|
Strategy 9: Increase public awareness about the importance of Open Country communities and the use of fire as a management tool in maintaining tallgrass habitat.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Open Country
Direct threat(s) addressed: Fire Suppression in Tallgrass Communities
Actions:
- Prepare and deliver public outreach materials (presentations, factsheets etc.) on the ecological importance of Tallgrass communities
- Circulate written materials and offer fact-filled presentations at local agricultural or other community events, St. Williams Conservation Reserve, Turkey Point Provincial Park, and local schools
- Prepare mail out packages for residents in close proximity to sites where prescribed burns are planned or anticipated
- Prepare a prescribed burn notice template that can be shared with partners organizing prescribed burns
- Engage members of the public as volunteers in the creation and maintenance of Open Country habitat
- Provide incentives to allow members of the public to become RX100 certified and create a volunteer program to increase public involvement in prescribed burns
- Engage knowledge resources such as Burn Bosses and the local fire departments to participate in public education and outreach
- Offer tours to members of the public to visit Open Country habitats across the LPWF Priority Place
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
9.0: By 2023, a public awareness campaign on the importance of Open Country communities, with an emphasis on fire as a management tool for tallgrass habitat is developed and executed with at least 2 public outreach events and 3 presentations given. |
|
Strategy 10: Provide support and opportunities for landowners to manage, restore and maintain Open Country habitat on private lands.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Open Country
Direct threat(s) addressed: Fire Suppression in Tallgrass Communities
Actions:
- Identify opportunities to restore and maintain Open Country habitat on private lands
- Develop site-specific management plans tailored to individual landowners managing Open Country communities
- Present incentive opportunities to landowners which aim to restore and maintain Open Country habitat on private lands (government led incentive programs, seed give-a-ways, education on habitat creation and maintenance, etc.)
- Develop landowner materials to identify funding opportunities and ecological benefits of habitat restoration
- Connect landowners to organizations such as Tallgrass Ontario, Nature Conservancy of Canada, Long Point Basin land Trust, ALUS Norfolk, and Pollinator Partnership
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
10.0: By 2023, at least 60 ha (of the 250 ha Open Country restoration objective) is restored and improved on private, non-conservation lands. |
|
10.1: By 2023, at least 5 prescribed burns have occurred on private, non-conservation lands to maintain/improve tallgrass habitat. |
|
Strategy 11: Restore, improve, and maintain natural features on agricultural lands.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Watercourses and Riparian Areas, Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay, Open Country, Forests and Treed Swamps, Beaches and Coastal Dunes
Direct threat(s) addressed: Agricultural Runoff
Actions:
- Provide environmental financing to agricultural landowners for restoration, maintenance and improvement of natural features
- Focus restoration and maintenance efforts on riparian buffers, grassland, hedgerows and wetlands
- Plant drought tolerant species in vegetated buffers
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
11.0: Protect habitat on agricultural land through conservation easement agreements to restore, improve and manage natural features. |
|
11.1: Restore and improve 200 ha of habitat on marginal agricultural land by 2023. |
|
11.2: Monitor and manage restored and improved habitat to assess the performance of buffer strips and natural features. |
|
11.3: Manage and diversify the plant species composition of existing hedgerows and plant additional hectares to link woodlands by 2023. |
|
Strategy 12: Promote the adoption of agricultural BMPs through existing incentive programs.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Watercourses and Riparian Areas, Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay, Open Country, Forests and Treed Swamps, Beaches and Coastal Dunes
Direct threat(s) addressed: Agricultural Runoff/Agriculture Sector
Actions:
- Deliver programs with extension personnel who can provide technical support on the ground and assist with funding securement for individual landowners
- Work with landowners to determine what BMPs they are interested in and what may work well for them
- Provide public tours of demonstration sites
- Conduct targeted, door-to-door campaign
- Promote Farmland Health Check-Up and LEADS/CAP program for funding
- Coordinate with commodity groups
- Support and enhance existing Agricultural BMP programs
- Conduct outreach to certified crop advisors
- Work with crop input providers to promote the use of cover crops
- Target farmer associations for outreach
- Provide economic incentives for planting cover crops
- Provide a tax break for implementing cover crop BMPs
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
12.0: Conduct at least 2 public tours of agricultural demonstration sites annually. |
|
12.1: By 2023, financial incentives are sufficient to meet the demand. |
|
12.2: By 2023, landowners are made aware of available funding programs and BMPs. |
|
12.3: By 2023, 50% of farms in Norfolk County maintain winter cover crops during the non-growing season. |
|
Strategy 13: Restore, improve and manage forest and treed swamp habitat with a focus on increasing connectivity and diversity.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Forests and Treed Swamps
Direct threat(s) addressed: Logging and wood harvesting, Invasive species, Recreational activities, Climate change
Actions:
- Develop a model to identify areas of low forest connectivity
- Develop, promote, implement and monitor Best Management Practices (BMP) for species at risk and the forest floor
- Distribute and develop educational materials about invasive species and tree diseases
- Engage landowners and land managers to follow BMPs where applicable
- Promote and develop incentive programs for improving forest condition, size and connectivity
- Monitor select sites to determine if roadside dumping has been reduced
- Monitor water levels within treed swamps
- Determine effects of forestry on breeding birds
- Give expert advice at Norfolk County Council meetings on tree-cutting by-laws
- Implement a tree planting program on private lands
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
13.0: By 2022, a model is created to identify areas with low forest connectivity. |
|
13.1: By 2023, landowners and land managers are engaged in forest management outreach regarding BMPs and incentive programs. |
|
Strategy 14: Acquire significant land through fee simple purchases and conservation easements.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay, Beaches and Coastal Dunes, Open Country, Watercourses and Riparian Areas, and Forests and Treed Swamps
Direct threat(s) addressed: Housing and Urban Areas, Annual and Perennial Non-Timber Crops, Other Ecosystem Modifications
Actions:
- Identify high priority areas for connectivity between protected areas
- Determine land securement priorities of ecologically significant parcels
- Secure sources of funding to support land acquisition, conservation easements and the ongoing management/monitoring of these properties
- Prepare communication materials to raise public awareness about the options for land securement.
- Educate partner organizations about communicating land securement options to landowners
- Design and implement a targeted outreach program of the private landowners for high priority parcels
- Request support from Norfolk County to hold title for properties that carry a tax burden
- Prepare a land securement funding strategy that includes a variety of innovative sources including climate change mitigation/green infrastructure funding and funds from municipal development charges
- Develop relationships with landowners of priority parcels
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
14.0: By 2030, at least 30% of natural heritage systems are conserved through well-connected networks of protected areas. |
|
Strategy 15: Identify and develop a “Natural Heritage System” and strategy for Norfolk County.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay, Beaches and Coastal Dunes, Open Country, Watercourses and Riparian Areas, and Forests and Treed Swamps
Direct threat(s) addressed: Housing and Urban Areas, Annual and Perennial Non-Timber Crops, Other Ecosystem Modifications
Actions:
- Involve the public and non-municipal agencies in the identification of natural heritage features and functions
- Undertake natural heritage inventories including the identification of core natural heritage features and corridors
- Determine appropriate setbacks and ecological buffers to the natural heritage systems
- Implement natural heritage systems policies in zoning bylaws as well as in other municipal bylaws
- Monitor the ecological health of the natural heritage system
- Establish provisions in policies to grow and enhance the secured and environmentally managed portion of the natural heritage system through conservation easements, stewardship agreements or acquisitions through severances
- Promote opportunities to cultivate the support of the agricultural community for natural heritage systems protection
- Explore methods of biodiversity offsetting on a net gain basis
- Provide financial incentives for natural heritage protection by private landowners
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
15.0: By 2025, a natural heritage system is developed and implemented by Norfolk County. |
- Existing natural heritage features delineated - Official Plan recognizes and provides protection to natural heritage features |
Strategy 16: Manage invasive plants in conservation lands and adjacent roadsides using best management practices.
Benefitting conservation target(s): Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay, Beaches and Coastal Dunes, Open Country, Watercourses and Riparian Areas, and Forests and Treed Swamps
Direct threat(s) addressed: Invasive Species
Actions:
- Document and report management techniques used and outcomes achieved to prioritize follow-up control
- Collate data and prioritize control efforts
- Create an Invasive Species Stewardship Team
- Eradicate non-native plants from Beaches and Coastal Dunes
- Document and report species and hectares managed
- Work with Norfolk Country and Ministry of Transportation Ontario to control invasive species on roadsides
| Objectives | Indicators |
|---|---|
| 16.0: Invasive plants become rare or absent (0-10% cover) in conservation areas by 2023. |
|
| 16.1: Invasive roadside plants become rare or absent (0-10% cover) adjacent to conservation lands and other strategic areas by 2023. |
|
Monitoring plan and reporting on progress
Monitoring and measuring the effectiveness of conservation action is central to good adaptive management. The CIP will apply three types of monitoring:
- Status monitoring: tracking the viability of the conservation targets and achievement of long-term goals.
- Effectiveness monitoring: tracking whether strategies are having their intended impacts through the achievement of objectives and reduction in threats.
- Project results monitoring: tracking the immediate outputs of the projects implementing the CIP.
The Long Point Walsingham Forest Priority Place CIP provides an overview of the monitoring plan and the information being tracked. Progress on the implementation of the CIP will be reported on annually. Visit the Priority Place website for more information.
Appendix 1. Nested species at risk targets in Long Point Walsingham Forest
The species listed below include the species at risk that have been identified for each conservation target. These are the species that may benefit from efforts to conserve and improve the conservation targets, although the implementation of strategies is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints of the participating jurisdictions and organizations.
Common name |
Scientific name |
Taxon |
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada status |
Species at Risk Act status |
Endangered Species Act (Ontario) |
Conservation targets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acadian Flycatcher |
Empidonax virescens |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
American Badger jacksoni subspecies |
Taxidea taxus jacksoni |
Mammals |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Open Country |
American Bumble Bee |
Bombus pensylvanicus |
Arthropods |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
No Status |
Open Country |
American Chestnut |
Castanea dentata |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
American Ginseng |
Panax quinquefolius |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
American Water-willow |
Justicia americana |
Vascular Plants |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Bald Eagle |
Haliaeetus leucocephalus |
Birds |
Not at Risk |
No Status |
Special Concern |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Bank Swallow |
Riparia riparia |
Birds |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Barn Owl (Eastern population) |
Tyto alba |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Open Country |
Barn Swallow |
Hirundo rustica |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Artificial Habitat Structures Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Bent Spike-rush (Great Lakes Plains population) |
Eleocharis geniculata |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Beaches and Coastal Dunes Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay |
Bird's-foot Violet |
Viola pedata |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Black Ash |
Fraxinus nigra |
Vascular Plants |
Threatened |
No Status |
No Status |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Black Tern |
Chlidonias niger |
Birds |
Not at Risk |
No Status |
Special Concern |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay |
Blanding's Turtle (Great Lakes / St. Lawrence population) |
Emydoidea blandingii |
Reptiles |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Threatened |
Amphibians and Reptiles Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Bobolink |
Dolichonyx oryzivorus |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Open Country |
Broad Beech Fern |
Phegopteris hexagonoptera |
Vascular Plants |
Special Concern |
No status |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Butternut |
Juglans cinerea |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Canada Warbler |
Cardellina canadensis |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Threatened |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Cerulean Warbler |
Setophaga cerulea |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Threatened |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Chimney Swift |
Chaetura pelagica |
Birds |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Artificial Habitat Structures Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Colicroot |
Aletris farinosa |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Open Country |
Common Hoptree |
Ptelea trifoliata |
Vascular Plants |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Beaches and Coastal Dunes Open Country |
Common Nighthawk |
Chordeiles minor |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special concern |
Beaches and Coastal Dunes Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Crooked-stem Aster |
Symphyotrichum prenanthoides |
Vascular Plants |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Cucumber Tree |
Magnolia acuminata |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Downy Yellow False Foxglove |
Aureolaria virginica |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Eastern Flowering Dogwood |
Cornus florida |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Eastern Foxsnake (Carolinian population) |
Pantherophis vulpinus |
Reptiles |
Threatened |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Amphibians and Reptiles Artificial Habitat Structures Beaches and Coastal Dunes Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Eastern Hog-nosed Snake |
Heterodon platirhinos |
Reptiles |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Amphibians and Reptiles Beaches and Coastal Dunes Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Eastern Meadowlark |
Sturnella magna |
Birds |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Open Country |
Eastern Milksnake |
Lampropeltis triangulum |
Reptiles |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
No Status |
Amphibians and Reptiles Artificial Habitat Structures Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Eastern Musk Turtle |
Sternotherus odoratus |
Reptiles |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Amphibians and Reptiles Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Eastern persius Duskywing |
Erynnis persius persius |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Extirpated |
Open Country |
Eastern Ribbonsnake (Great Lakes population) |
Thamnophis sauritus |
Reptiles |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Amphibians and Reptiles Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Eastern Whip-poor-will |
Antrostomus vociferus |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Eastern Wood-pewee |
Contopus virens |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
False-foxglove Sun Moth |
Pyrrhia aurantiago |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
Endangered |
No Status |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Fern-leaved Yellow False Foxglove |
Aureolaria pedicularia |
Vascular Plants |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Fowler's Toad |
Anaxyrus fowleri |
Amphibians |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Amphibians and Reptiles Beaches and Coastal Dunes Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay |
Frosted Elfin |
Callophrys irus |
Arthropods |
Extirpated |
Extirpated |
Extirpated |
Open Country |
Golden-winged Warbler |
Vermivora chrysoptera |
Birds |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Grasshopper Sparrow, pratensis subspecies |
Ammodramus savannarum pratensis |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Open Country |
Gray Ratsnake (Carolinian population) |
Pantherophis spiloides |
Reptiles |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Amphibians and Reptiles Artificial Habitat Structures Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Grey Fox |
Urocyon cinereoargenteus |
Mammals |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Gypsy Cuckoo Bumble Bee |
Bombus bohemicus |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Harris’s Sparrow |
Zonotrichia querula |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
No status |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Henslow's Sparrow |
Ammodramus henslowii |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Open Country |
Horsetail Spike-rush |
Eleocharis equisetoides |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay |
Jefferson Salamander |
Ambystoma jeffersonianum |
Amphibians |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Amphibians and Reptiles Forests and Treed Swamps |
Karner Blue |
Plebejus samuelis |
Arthropods |
Extirpated |
Extirpated |
Extirpated |
Open Country |
King Rail |
Rallus elegans |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Large Whorled Pogonia |
Isotria verticillata |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Laura’s Clubtail |
Stylurus laurae |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
No Status |
Endangered |
Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Least Bittern |
Ixobrychus exilis |
Birds |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Little Brown Myotis |
Myotis lucifugus |
Mammals |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Aritifical Habitat Structures Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Louisiana Waterthrush |
Parkesia motacilla |
Birds |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Midland Painted Turtle |
Chrysemys picta marginata |
Reptiles |
Special concern |
Special concern |
No Status |
Amphibians and Reptiles Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Monarch |
Danaus plexippus |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Special Concern |
Open Country |
Mottled Duskywing (Great Lakes Plains population) |
Erynnis martialis |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Open Country |
Nine-spotted Lady Beetle |
Coccinella novemnotata |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Northern Map Turtle |
Graptemys geographica |
Reptiles |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Amphibians and Reptiles Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Northern Myotis |
Myotis septentrionalis |
Mammals |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Olive-sided Flycatcher |
Contopus cooperi |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Piping Plover circumcinctus subspecies |
Charadrius melodus circumcinctus |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Beaches and Coastal Dunes |
Prothonotary Warbler |
Protonotaria citrea |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Queensnake |
Regina septemvittata |
Reptiles |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Amphibians and Reptiles Artificial Habitat Structures Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Red-headed Woodpecker |
Melanerpes erythrocephalus |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Riverine Clubtail (Great Lakes Plains population) |
Stylurus amnicola |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Round-leaved Greenbrier (Great Lakes population) |
Smilax rotundifolia |
Vascular Plants |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Rusty Blackbird |
Euphagus carolinus |
Birds |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Rusty-patched Bumble Bee |
Bombus affinis |
Arthropods |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Open Country |
Short-eared Owl |
Asio flammeus |
Birds |
Threatened |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Open Country |
Small White Lady's-slipper |
Cypripedium candidum |
Vascular Plants |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Endangered |
Open Country |
Smooth Yellow False Foxglove |
Aureolaria flava |
Vascular Plants |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Snapping Turtle |
Chelydra serpentina |
Reptiles |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Amphibians and Reptiles Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Spiny Softshell |
Apalone spinifera |
Reptiles |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Amphibians and Reptiles Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Spotted Turtle |
Clemmys guttata |
Reptiles |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Amphibians and Reptiles Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay Forest and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Spotted Wintergreen |
Chimaphila maculata |
Vascular Plants |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Swamp Rose-mallow |
Hibiscus moscheutos |
Vascular Plants |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Coastal Wetlands and Inner Bay |
Transverse Lady Beetle |
Coccinella transversoguttata |
Arthropods |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Tri-colored Bat |
Perimyotis subflavus |
Mammals |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Forests and Treed Swamps Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
Unisexual Ambystoma Jefferson Salamander dependent population |
Ambystoma laterale – (2) jeffersonianum |
Amphibians |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Amphibians and Reptiles Forests and Treed Swamps |
Virginia Goat's-rue |
Tephrosia virginiana |
Vascular Plants |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Open Country |
Wood Thrush |
Hylocichla mustelina |
Birds |
Threatened |
Threatened |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Woodland Vole |
Microtus pinetorum |
Mammals |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps |
Yellow-banded Bumble Bee |
Bombus terricola |
Arthropods |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Special Concern |
Forests and Treed Swamps Open Country |
Yellow-breasted Chat virens subspecies |
Icteria virens virens |
Birds |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Endangered |
Open Country Watercourses and Riparian Areas |
























