# 2025-142 Careers, Occupational Transfer, Voluntary Occupational Transfer

Case summary

F&R Date: 2026-05-25

The grievor challenged the decision to deny their Subsidized Education Entry Level Masters (SEELM) application and contended that there was interference in the process. They explained that judicial proceeding information used against them was not permitted. As redress, the grievor sought the removal of all judicial process documentation from their personnel file and an explanation why interference in their process was allowed. 

The Initial Authority (IA), the Chaplain General, determined that there was no interference in the grievor's SEELM application. The IA explained that chaplains are considered spiritual advisors and are free to advise organizations about any potential conflict when it concerns their area of responsibility. The IA directed the grievor's unit to remove any judicial proceeding information from their personnel file.

The Committee found that the decision to deny the grievor's SEELM application was justified. The Committee determined that chaplains are accountable to the Chaplain General, particularly on spiritual matters, and are responsible for establishing professional standards, selecting candidates, and consulting with the Interfaith Committee of the Canadian Military Chaplaincy (ICCMC). The ICCMC establishes the academic, spiritual and professional religious standards required for chaplaincy candidates, ensures that applicants meet these standards, and verifies and endorses those who are eligible. The Committee explained that the grievor's application for SEELM was treated appropriately and rejected the grievor's allegation of inappropriate interference. 

The Committee recommended that the Final Authority not afford the grievor redress.