Archived - Decision: 04-036 Canada Labour Code Part II Occupational Health and Safety
Archived information
Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
Public Service Alliance of Canada and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada |
This case was decided by Thomas Farrell, appeals officer.
[1] On January 2, 2002, Ms. Donna Wojcik, a Post-Secondary Student Support Clerk employed at Indian and Northern Affairs Canada regional office located at 275 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba exercised her right to refuse to work at her assigned office on the 15th floor of 235 Portage Avenue, citing poor air quality as the reason for the refusal. Health and Safety Officer Alex Kozubal investigated the complaint on the morning of January 3, 2002. Following his initial visit to the workplace he requested that an Industrial Hygiene Technician test the workplace in question. The technician conducted air quality tests in various locations of the building and the test results were forwarded to the Industrial Hygiene Engineer in Ottawa. The report from the Industrial Hygiene Engineer stated that the air quality tests indicated that the air in the workplace was safe and well above standard. On February 6, 2002 Health and Safety Officer Kozubal issued his decision that danger does not exist. On February 11, 2002 Ms. Wojcik appealed the health and safety officer's decision to an appeals officer pursuant to subsection 129 (7) of the Canada Labour Code, Part II.
[2] As the Appeals Officer assigned to this case I informed the parties involved of my intention to proceed with this appeal in accordance with subsection 146.2 of the Canada Labour Code, Part II, without a hearing and render a decision based on the documentation that has been placed on file.
[3] A timeframe was provided to the appellant to provide any additional information and further time for the employer to respond to this new information.
[4] On October 19, 2004, I received a letter dated October 13, 2002 from Ms. Joanna Miazga, Regional Representative for the Public Service Alliance of Canada stating, "There is no additional information that I have received from Ms. Wojcik regarding this matter."
[5] In relation to this appeal filed by Ms. Wojcik, outlined that her concern that the air quality on the 15th floor of the Indian and Northern Affairs building at 235 Portage Avenue was a danger to her due to her specific medical condition. The test results from the industrial hygiene survey conducted in this building clearly indicated that the air quality did not contain any contaminants that would be considered unusual, and in fact the air quality in the building was somewhat better than the air immediately outside the building.
[6] In the matter of the appeal of the decision of 'no danger' made by Health and Safety Officer Alex Kozubal on February 6, 2002 regarding the air quality on the 15th floor of 235 Portage Avenue in Winnipeg.
[7] I have reviewed all the information provided by the applicant as well as the medical information provided and the information that was provided by the employer. I have concluded that Health and Safety Officer Kozubal's decision of no danger was correct and I therefore confirm the decision.
_______________________
Thomas Farrell
Appeals Officer
Summary of Decision
Decision No.: | 04-036 |
Applicant: | Public Service Alliance of Canada |
Employer: | Indian and Northern Affairs Canada |
Key Words: | Decision, refusal to work, air quality |
Provisions: | Code 129(7) Regulations |
Summary: The applicant refused to work because of poor air quality. Following his investigation, the health and safety officer requested that an industrial hygiene technician test the air quality in the workplace. The test resulted in the air quality being safe and well above standard. The appeals officer therefore confirmed the health and safety officer's decision that a danger did not exist. |
Page details
- Date modified: