Archived - Decision 08-001

Archived information

Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Canada Labour Code Part II
Occupational Health and Safety

Case No.: 2006-53
Decision No.: CAO-08-001

Air Canada
appellant

and

Canadian Union of Public employees
(CUPE)
respondent
___________________________
January 30, 2008

This case was decided by Appeals Officer Pierre Guénette.

For the appellant
Rachelle Henderson, counsel

For the respondent
James Robbins, counsel

This case concerns an appeal made on August 31, 2006, pursuant to subsection 146(1) of the Canada Labour Code, Part II (the Code), by Rachelle Henderson, Counsel, Labour and Employment, Air Canada.

[1] The appeal is against a direction issued to Air Canada on August 2, 2006, by health and safety officer Françoise Dehaye (HSO Dehaye) pursuant to paragraph 145(1)(a) of the Code.

[2] France Pelletier, the employee Co-chair of the In-Flight Service Policy Committee submitted a complaint to Transport Canada on May 16, 2005. The purpose of the complaint was due to the fact that employee representatives on workplace health and safety committees and the policy committee were not being notified of hazardous occurrences by the employer. In addition, she complained that the employer changed the procedure for hazardous occurrences notification without consultation with employee representatives of the Policy Committee.

[3] On completion of her investigation, HSO Dehaye issued a direction to Air Canada on August 2, 2006.

[4] The direction states:

Direction to Air Canada Under Subsection 145 (1)

After investigating a complaint that was received May 16th, 2005, the undersigned health and safety officer is of the opinion that the following provisions of the Canada Labour Code, Part II, and the Aviation Occupational Safety and Health Regulations are being contravened:

Paragraph 125.(1) (z.08) of the Canada Labour Code, Part II

“…every employer shall…cooperate with the policy and work place committees or the health and safety representative in the execution of their duties under this Part;”

Paragraph 125.(1) (z.09) of the Canada Labour Code, Part II

“…every employer shall…develop health and safety policies and programs in consultation with the policy committee or, if there is no policy committee, with the work place committee or the health and safety representative;”

Subsection 9.3 (c) of the Aviation Occupational Safety and Health Regulations

“Where an employer is aware of an accident, occupational disease or other hazardous occurrence affecting any of the employees in the course of employment on an aircraft, the employer shall, as soon as possible, …notify the safety and health committee or the safety and health representative, if either exists, of the hazardous occurrence and of the name of the qualified person appointed to investigate it.”

The employer did not consult with the Policy Committee in the development of the call-out process and its modifications which were submitted to Transport Canada in January 2006. Also, the Work Place Committee employee representatives were not, in many instances, informed by the employer of hazardous occurrence affecting flight attendants.

Therefore, you are hereby Directed, pursuant to paragraph 145(1)(a) of the Canada Labour Code, Part II, to terminate the above contraventions by September 1st, 2006.

Issued at Montreal this 2nd, day of August 2006.

[5] While in the process to schedule the hearing, a fax letter dated January 28, 2008 from the appellant’s counsel was received at the Canada Appeals Office on Occupational Health and Safety (Appeals Office).

[6] The said letter advised the Appeals Office that Air Canada was withdrawing its appeal of the direction issued on August 2, 2006 by HSO Dehaye.

[7] Considering the written notification to withdraw the appeal and having reviewed the file, this appeal is withdrawn and this case is closed.

_________________
Pierre Guénette
Appeals Officer


Summary of Appeals Officer Decision

Decision : CAO-08-001

Appellant: Air Canada

Respondent: Canadian Union of Public employees (CUPE)

Provisions: Canada Labour Code, 146(1), 145(1)(a), 125.(1) (z.08), 125.(1) (z.09)
Aviation Occupational Safety and Health Regulations, 9.3 (c)

Key Words: Direction, complaint, notification of hazardous occurrences, withdrawal.

Summary:

On August 31, 2006, Rachelle Henderson, Counsel, Labour and Employment, Air Canada appealed a direction issued by HSO Dehaye on August 2, 2006. On January 28, 2008, Ms Henderson withdrew her appeal. The case is therefore close.

Page details

Date modified: