Departmental results report and departmental plan: Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates—March 12, 2020

Document navigation for "Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates: March 12, 2020"

2018 to 2019 Departmental Results Report overview

Background: Departmental Results Report

The Departmental Results Report (DRR) presents the department’s actual accomplishments against the plans, priorities and expected results set out in the corresponding Departmental Plan. The report is tabled in parliament.

Status: Departmental Results Report

The 2018 to 2019 Departmental Results Report for Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) was tabled in parliament on February 26, 2020.

Priority activities: Departmental Results Report

The activities identified below summarize PSPC’s key accomplishments and are presented by the department’s 5 core responsibilities.

Performance results: Departmental Results Report

Key performance trends stemming from the report include:

Key financial information: Departmental Results Report

Budgetary performance information for core responsibilities and internal services in dollars, including the 2018— to 2019 main estimates, and the 2018 to 2019 planned and actual spending.

Budgetary performance information for core responsibilities and internal services (in dollars)

Purpose of funding

2018 to 2019

Main

Estimates

2018 to 2019

planned spending

2018 to 2019

actual spending

Core responsibilities

2,999,994,374

2,999,994,374

3,594,518,662

Internal services

235,396,731

235,396,731

284,557,972

Totals

3,235,391,105

3,235,391,105

3,879,076,634

The difference of $643.7 million between the 2018 to 2019 actual spending and the 2018 to 19 planned spending is mainly due to:

Questions and answers: Departmental Results Report

Background for question 1: The 2018 to 2019 actual result for the departmental result indicator “Percentage of suppliers that rate the purchasing process as fair and transparent” indicates that PSPC achieved this 56% of the time. The methodology for this indicator is being reviewed so that a meaningful target can be established as of 2021 to 2022. Public Services and Procurement Canada will be working to ensure a better response rate and result for 2019 to 2020.

Question 1: What are the previous results for the indicator “Percentage of suppliers that rate the purchasing process as fair and transparent”?

Answer 1: This is the first time the Departmental Results Report reports this performance indicator; in essence it will create a baseline which will permit for improvements.

Work is underway to refine the questions and associated methodology in advance of the next survey being administered in summer 2020. Part of this work will include providing definitions on key terms (for example, defining “fair”). The results of the 2020 survey will be published in the 2019 to 2020 DRR.

In addition, my department will seek to increase the response rate for suppliers. The 2018 to 19 results are based on a random sample of 2,519 subject matter expert (SME)s awarded contracts in 2018 received an invitation to participate in the survey. Of these, 570 (23%) completed the survey. We will seek ways to increase the rate of completion for the survey.

Finally, my department anticipates SME responses to improve over time through the implementation of procurement modernization initiatives, including contract simplification and the electronic procurement solution.

Background for question 2: Four departmental result indicators under this core responsibility are missing results and targets due to lack of available data. The current procurement systems will be replaced by 2021, following the implementation of the electronic procurement solution (EPS), which will be able to capture the required data systematically.

Question 2: What is your plan to address the lack of data to measure the participation of Indigenous businesses and businesses owned by women in procurement processes?

Answer 2: As noted in my mandate letter, publishing clear metrics to measure government performance on procurements is a priority.

We are taking significant steps in this area, including implementing an electronic procurement solution that will make it easier and faster for all suppliers, such as small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as those owned by women and Indigenous People to do business with the government.

In addition, the electronic procurement solution will help us improve the quality of data being collected, and enhance our ability to report on public procurement activities.

Our Office of Small and Medium Enterprises is also making efforts to collect diversity-based data through outreach activities and undertaking a regular survey with diverse small and medium enterprises.

Background for question 3: With respect to the indicator: “Percentage of PSPC contracts, standing offers and supply arrangements that include green goods and services”, PSPC has seen a significant increase in the 2018 to 2019 result due to continued engagement with clients and industry on the broader inclusion of environmental criteria in procurements, and by providing clients with opportunities to reduce their environmental footprints.

Question 3: What are you doing to improve the percentage of PSPC contracts, standing offers and supply arrangements that include green goods and services?

Answer 3: We are introducing environmental considerations when we plan, buy, use and dispose of all goods and services, including construction. Since May 2018, environmental considerations have been incorporated into standing offers and supply arrangements for more than 30 categories of goods and services.

As of May 1, 2019, new features have been added to the Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements Application (SOSA App) to effectively capture and track all procurement instruments that have incorporated environmental considerations. When buyers are looking to use the SOSA App, they can now apply a green filter, so that the available instruments with environmental considerations are identified as options.

We are also prioritizing commodities that will have the greatest overall impact in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and plastic waste, and ensuring that where plastics are procured, they are recyclable or manufactured from recycled content.

We are also engaging the market through requests for information to test readiness with respect to establishing stronger requirements for both plastic packaging, as well as durability of goods.

Review of Public Services and Procurement Canada Departmental Results Framework in the context of its Departmental Plan and Departmental Results Report

Context

Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) revised its Departmental Results Framework (DRF) in 2019 to 2020 to reflect developments in evidence-based performance measurement regimes as well as better support data availability.

The 2020 to 2021 Departmental Plan (DP), based on the revised DRF, comprises 15 departmental results and 45 departmental result indicators.

The 2018 to 2019 Departmental Results Report (DRR), based on PSPC’s initial DRF, comprised 16 departmental results and 49 departmental result indicators.

Key messages

Current status and/or next steps

In 2020 à 2021, PSPC will continue to develop and review the methodology supporting its departmental result indicators to ensure their relevancy and robustness while collecting data to support their measurement.

Questions and answers

Question 1: What are the changes from the 2018 to 2019 DRR to the 2020 to 2021 DP?

Answer 1: PSPC revised its Departmental Results Framework (DRF) in 2019 to 2020 as part of the annual DRF review process to reflect developments in evidence-based performance measurement regimes as well as better support data availability.

As a result of the DRF review, no changes were made to the department’s core responsibilities. However, the revised DRF used for the 2020 to 2021 DP now includes 15 departmental results, while the initial DRF used for the 2018 to 2019 DRR included 16 departmental results.

One departmental result (about national heritage assets) under the property and infrastructure core responsibility was incorporated into another overarching real property departmental result to reduce duplication, redundancy, and streamline departmental-level reporting.

A few departmental result indicators were also amended as part of the DRF review to best reflect PSPC’s performance story and adopt more meaningful measures. There is a total of 45 indicators included in the 2020 to 2021 DP, while the 2018 to 2019 DRR included 49.

Question 2: Why did PSPC review its Departmental Results Framework?

Answer 2: As part of an annual review process initiated by the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS), PSPC reviewed its DRF in 2019 to 2020 for the purposes of streamlining departmental-level reporting. Amendments were made to departmental results and departmental result indicators to reflect developments in evidence-based performance measurement regimes and lessons learned during the implementation of the initial DRF, as well as better support data availability. The amended DRF was officially approved by TBS in December 2019 for reporting starting in 2020 to 2021.

Question 3: How does the DRF review impact PSPC’s performance story?

Answer 3: No changes were made to the department’s core responsibilities. One departmental result (about national heritage assets) under the property and infrastructure core responsibility was incorporated into another overarching real property departmental result to reduce duplication, redundancy, and streamline departmental-level reporting. A few departmental result indicators were amended to best reflect PSPC’s performance story.

2020 to 2021 Departmental Plan overview

Background

The departmental plan is a mechanism of ministerial accountability, communicating departmental expenditure plans for the next 3 years, as well as an organization’s priorities, resource requirements and expected results. The plan is tabled annually in Parliament and published for all Canadians.

Status

The 2020 to 2021 Departmental Plan for PSPC was tabled in Parliament on March 10, 2020.

Priority activities

The activities identified below summarize PSPC’s key priorities as well as the minister’s mandate commitments and are presented by the department’s core responsibility.

Performance results

Key performance trends stemming from the report include:

Key financial information

Budgetary planning information for core responsibilities and internal services in dollars, including the 2020 to 2021 Main Estimates, and the 2021 to 2022 and 2022 to 2023 planned spending.

Budgetary planning information for core responsibilities and internal services (in dollars)

Purpose of funding

2020 to 2021 Main Estimates

2021 to 2022 planned spending

2022 to 2023 planned spending

Core responsibilities

3,766,548,082

3,799,095,758

3,569,313,877

Internal services

281,723,937

271,071,532

258,397,860

Totals

4,048,272,019

4,070,167,290

3,827,711,737

For 2022 to 2023, the department plans to spend $221 million less than in 2020 to 2021. The decrease is due to the end or winding down of funding in a broad suite of initiatives including:

Document navigation for "Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates: March 12, 2020"

Page details

Date modified: