Key compliance attributes of Internal Audit

Why publish key compliance attributes of Internal Audit

The objective of the Treasury Board Policy on Internal Audit is to ensure that the oversight of public resources throughout the federal public administration is informed by a professional and objective internal audit function that is independent of departmental management.

Heads of organizations are responsible for ensuring that internal audit in the department is carried out in accordance with the Institute of Internal Auditors International Professional Practices Framework unless the framework is in conflict with the Treasury Board Policy or its related directive; if there is a conflict, the Policy or Directive will prevail.

Departments with internal audit functions are required to publish key attributes of compliance as per section A.2.2.3.1 of the Treasury Board Directive on Internal Audit. It is important that the public is aware that heads of government organizations are receiving assurance and that activities are managed in a way that demonstrates responsible stewardship.

These attributes have been selected because they demonstrate to an external audience that, at a minimum, the fundamental elements necessary for oversight are in place, are operating as intended and are achieving results. The key attributes of compliance with the Policy and standards are:

Publishing departmental key compliance attributes provides pertinent information to Canadians and parliamentarians regarding the professionalism, performance, and impact of the internal audit function in departments. These are not performance measures and no targets are attached. Under the Policy, the Comptroller General has the authority to amend these attributes, should there be changes in the internal audit environment and/or due to the evolving maturity of the internal audit function.

Results of key compliance attributes
Key compliance attributes Results
Do internal auditors in departments have the training required to do the job effectively? Are multidisciplinary teams in place to address diverse risks? 1(a) 55% of staff with an internal audit or accounting designation (Certified Internal Auditor [CIA], Chartered Professional Accountant [CPA])
1(b) 5% of staff with an internal audit or accounting designation (CIA, CPA) in progress
1(c) 15% of staff holding other designations (CGAP, CISA, PMP, etc.) Contracting funds are expended to bring in expertise as required.
Is internal audit work performed in conformance with the international standards for the profession of internal audit and as required by Treasury Board policy? 2(a) October 19, 2023 - Date of last comprehensive briefing to the Departmental Audit Committee on the internal processes, tools, and information considered necessary to evaluate conformance with the IIA Code of Ethics and the Standards and the results of the quality assurance and improvement program (QAIP).
2(b) April 28, 2022 - Date of last external assessment

Are the Risk-based Audit and Evaluation Plans (RBAEPs) submitted to audit committees and approved by deputy heads implemented as planned with resulting reports published?

Is management acting on audit recommendations for improvements to departmental processes?

3. In the approved 2023-28 RBAEPs and related information, refer to the table below for:

  • name / status of audit for the current* fiscal year of the RBAEPs
  • date the audit report was approved
  • date the audit report was published
  • original planned date for completion of all management action plan (MAP) items
  • status of MAP items
*Audits from past fiscal years will remain listed in the table until 100% MAP implementation is achieved. Audit engagements will remain listed on the site for a minimum six-month period after 100% implementation has been achieved and published.
Is internal audit credible and adding value in support of the mandate and strategic objectives of the organization?

4. Average overall usefulness rating of areas audited.

  • 0% excellent
  • 100% good
  • 0% fair
  • 0% poor
Internal audit engagement status and related information for fiscal year 2023 to 2024
Item number Internal audit title Audit status Report approved date Report published date Original planned MAP completion date Implementation status
1 Audit of Conditions of Confinement Planned n/a n/a n/a n/a
2 Audit of Fire Safety In progress n/a n/a n/a n/a
3 Audit of Indigenous Intervention Centres Approved - Not published March 1, 2024 n/a n/a n/a
4 Audit of Offender Management System Modernization – Systems Under Development Phase II Approved - Not published March 17, 2024 n/a n/a n/a
5 Audit of Organizational Culture In progress n/a n/a n/a n/a
6 Audit of Sentence Management Published – MAP not fully implemented
March 7, 2023 July 14, 2023 June 30, 2024 77%
7 Audit of the Management of Elder Services Published – MAP not fully implemented August 5, 2022 December 9, 2022 March 29, 2024 18%
8 Audit of the Management of Offenders with Special Needs Planned n/a n/a n/a n/a
9 Audit of the Mother-Child Program In progress n/a n/a n/a n/a
10 Audit of the National Infrastructure Contribution Program Published – MAP not fully implemented June 9, 2021 September 7, 2021 March 31, 2022 100%
11 Audit of Victim Services Published – MAP not fully implemented March 24, 2021 May 28, 2021 December 31, 2021 93%
12 Joint Audit and Evaluation of Structured Intervention Units In progress n/a n/a n/a n/a
13 Structured Intervention Unit Audit Readiness Engagement Published November 30, 2022 April 5, 2023 n/a n/a

You might also be interested in

 

Page details

Date modified: