Briefing binder created for the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and the Deputy Minister of Finance on the occasion of their appearance at the Standing Committee on Finance on October 6, 2025 on the Budgetary Cycle 2025-26 and Bill C-4, An Act respecting certain affordability measures for Canadians and another measure

Bill C-4, Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act

Key Facts and Figures

  • Bill C-4 proposes to:
    • Reduce the lowest personal tax rate from 15 per cent to 14 per cent, providing tax relief for nearly 22 million Canadians.
      • Rate of 14.5 per cent applies for 2025.
      • Individuals could receive tax relief of up to $420 in 2026 (the first full year where the rate would be 14 per cent).
      • Two-income families could receive tax relief up to $840.
    • Eliminate the Goods and Services Tax (GST) for first-time home buyers on new homes valued up to $1 million, saving them up to $50,000, and lower the GST for first-time home buyers on new homes valued between $1 million and $1.5 million.
    • Remove the consumer carbon price from law, following the ceasing of its application, effective April 1, 2025.
    • Amend the Canada Elections Act to make changes to the requirements relating to political parties' for the protection of personal information.
  • The bill was adopted at Second Reading in the House of Commons with all party support on June 12, 2025. The bill currently stands referred to the Standing Committee on Finance for study.

Supplementary Information

Bill C-4, Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act, is composed of four parts:

  • Part 1 amends the Income Tax Act to reduce the marginal personal income tax rate on the lowest tax bracket ($57,375 and below in 2025) to 14.‍5% for the 2025 taxation year and to 14% for the 2026 and subsequent taxation years.
    • Nearly 22 million Canadians would benefit from tax relief of up to $420 per person in 2026, saving two-income families up to $840 a year.
    • The bulk of tax relief will go to individuals whose total taxable income is under $114,750 in 2025, with nearly half of the relief benefitting Canadians in the first bracket (taxable income $57,375 and below in 2025).
    • The Canada Revenue Agency has updated its source deduction tables for the July to December 2025 period so that employers and pay administrators were able to reduce tax withholdings as of July 1. This means that individuals with employment income and other income subject to source deductions could already have tax withheld at the new rate of 14 per cent. Otherwise, individuals will realize this tax relief when they file their 2025 tax returns in spring 2026.
  • Part 2 amends the Excise Tax Act and related regulations to implement a temporary GST new housing rebate for first-time home buyers.
    • It is estimated this measure will save first-time home buyers a total of $3.9 billion over five years.
    • Eliminating the GST on new homes up to $1 million and lowering GST on new homes up to $1.5 million will also create demand for newly built homes, which could in turn help spur new construction. Expanding the housing stock is key to addressing housing affordability issues.
    • The measure is intended to help first-time home buyers enter the housing market, rather than people who already own a home.
  • Part 3 repeals Part 1 of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act and the Fuel Charge Regulations.
  • Part 4 amends the Canada Elections Act to make changes to the requirements relating to political parties' policies for the protection of personal information.

Issues Raised by Parliamentarians and Stakeholders

Part 1 – Income Tax Act

Some senators and stakeholders have questioned the potentially negative impact that the reduction to the first personal tax rate (and thus the non-refundable credit rate) will have for certain individuals who receive non-refundable tax credits, particularly on the Disability Tax Credit (DTC) and the Medical Expense Tax Credit (METC).

Question:

Will the government address concerns about the consequences of reducing the first personal tax rate from 15% to 14% on Canadians who receive tax relief under the Disability Tax Credit and the Medical Expense Tax Credit?

Response:

For any tax change, what matters is the impact on an individual's overall tax bill. For millions of Canadians, including 4.5 million individuals who claim the Disability Tax Credit and/or Medical Expense Tax Credit, tax savings from the middle-class tax cut will outweigh the reduction in the value of non-refundable credits.

The Government has heard the concerns about the potential negative impact of C-4 on a very small number of the people who receive the Disability and/or Medical Expense tax credits. We are taking a closer look at this issue.

Part 2 – Excise Tax Act
  • Some stakeholders questioned why the GST rebate for new homes only applies to purchases under agreements entered into on or after May 27, 2025.

Question:

Why doesn't the policy apply to purchases that had not closed prior to May 27, 2025?

Response:

Any time there is a change in policy, there will be people that fall on either side of the change. Individuals that have already decided to buy a new home before May 27, 2025 agreed to a price that did not reflect the measure. This approach ensures fairness since it treats all buyers who entered into agreements before May 27 the same way.

Part 3 - Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act
  • Members of parliament and senators may question why Part 1 of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (GGPA) is being repealed in phases.

Question:

Why is it necessary to proceed with the repeal in phases rather than all at once?

Response:

A sequential repeal of the fuel charge provisions would help ensure an orderly process for charge payers. Charge payers will have a further six months to claim rebates to which they are entitled, for example for fuel charge paid on fuel purchased prior to April 1, 2025 but exported on or after that date from a province or territory where the fuel charge applied. Various administrative provisions will remain in the legislation for a longer period to provide continuity and certainty for final wind-down activities, including CRA administrative processes that may continue to rely on existing rules, such as definitions. These additional phases of repeal relate to fuel charge obligations for reporting periods prior to April 1, 2025. The fuel charge ceased to apply as of April 1, 2025.

  • During Second Reading debate several Conservative Party members called for the government to also repeal Part 2 of the GGPPA which implements an output-based pricing system on large emitters in listed jurisdictions. 
  • The Bloc Quebecois has argued that it is unfair for the government to have proceeded with a final Canada Carbon Rebate payment in April 2025 (only in provinces where the fuel charge applied) that was not funded by the fuel charge but out of the consolidated revenue fund.

Question:

Why did the government provide a final Canada Carbon Rebate payment in April 2025 only to residents of provinces where the fuel charge applied?

Response:

As part of the transition away from the fuel charge, eligible Canadians received a final Canada Carbon Rebate payment, starting in April 2025.

The government decided to provide this final payment to eligible households in provinces where the federal fuel charge applied because Canadian families, especially low-income families, had been counting on it, and planning their family budgets on the assumption they would be getting it.

The federal fuel charge only applied in provinces that did not have their own systems in place to put a consumer price on pollution, and the majority of proceeds from the federal fuel charge were returned to households in these provinces via the Canada Carbon Rebate.

Part 4 - Canada Elections Act
  • No major concerns were raised by opposition parties in the House of Commons about Part 4. During second reading debate, MP Bonk (CPC) noted that the government should be taking the opportunity to create a clear, principled and enforceable privacy framework. He went on to note that while the bill addresses jurisdictional gaps, it should not be mistaken for a comprehensive solution.
  • Concerns have been raised in the senate regarding Part 4 provisions weakening privacy protections and potentially leaving voters' personal information vulnerable to misuse by political parties

Question:

Why would federal political parties be exempt from complying with provincial personal information protection laws? Is this in response to the ongoing litigation out of British Columbia?

Response:

In 2022, British Columbia's Information and Privacy Commissioner found that the provincial act, the Personal Information Protection Act, applies to federal political parties in the province. This opens the door to competing authorities and a patchwork of provincial privacy rules applicable to federal political parties, where the obligations of federal political parties vary across jurisdictions, which could lead to uncertainty, inefficiency, confusion, and ultimately an erosion of trust amongst voters in how their personal information is managed. The federal government has been clear that the Canada Elections Act provides a uniform federal approach in respect of federal political parties' activities involving personal information, including but not limited to collection, use, disclosure, retention, and disposal.

  • While it is not expected to receive much attention, opposition parties may ask about how Part 4 will be enforced.

Question:

What happens if someone does not comply with the privacy policy?

Response:

Federal political parties and those acting on their behalf (e.g., volunteers) will be required to comply or may newly face consequences under the Canada Elections Act's existing enforcement regime, including caution and information letters or, if warranted, an administrative monetary penalty of $50 to $1,500 for a person or $300 to $5,000 for an entity.

Question:

Will the Privacy Commissioner have a role? 

Response:

No. Consistent with the regulation of federal political parties through the Canada Elections Act, regulatory oversight would remain with the Chief Electoral Officer and the Commissioner of Canada Elections. The Privacy Commissioner does not have a mandate under the Act. This bill does not change that.

  • In addition, Green Party Leader Elizabeth May argued that Part 4 has no clear link with affordability, therefore turning C-4 into an omnibus bill which would require separate votes.

An Act respecting certain affordability measures for Canadians and another measure

Part 1 – Income Tax Act

Lowering Income Tax Rates for Individuals

Key Messages

  • The federal government is proposing to reduce the lowest personal tax rate from 15 per cent to 14 per cent, effective July 1, 2025, which will put more money back into the pockets of hard-working Canadians.
  • Working Canadians could already be seeing these tax savings on their pay cheques as of July 1 when withholding rates were adjusted.
  • Individuals who benefit would receive tax relief of up to $420 in 2026 (the first full-year where the rate would be 14 per cent), and two-income families would receive tax relief up to $840.

Questions & Answers

Q. The Government announced that the lowest personal income tax rate is changing to 14% effective July 1, 2025. If so, why will the tax rate be 14.5% for the 2025 taxation year? What happens to employment income that has had tax withheld at 15% in the first half of the year?

A. Income is reported and tax is calculated on an annual basis. To reflect a one-percentage-point cut in the lowest tax rate coming into effect halfway through the year, the full-year tax rate for 2025 would be 14.5 per cent and the full-year rate for 2026 and future tax years would be 14 per cent.

This approach would make the proposed tax rate reduction simple for all Canadians.

The Canada Revenue Agency has updated its source deduction tables for the July to December 2025 period so that pay administrators were able to reduce tax withholdings as of July 1. This means that, since July 1, individuals with employment income and other income subject to source deductions could have tax withheld at 14 per cent. Otherwise, individuals would realize this tax relief when they file their 2025 tax returns in spring 2026.

Q. How much will the tax rate reduction cost?

A. This middle-class tax cut is expected to provide $2.6 billion in tax relief to Canadians in 2025 and $5.4 billion in 2026, the first full year when the tax rate is 14 per cent. Over five years, the total fiscal cost would be $27.2 billion.

Q. Who will benefit the most from this tax cut? Is this tax cut going to help Canadians struggling with a higher cost of living?

A. Nearly 22 million Canadians would benefit from tax relief of up to $420 per person in 2026, saving two-income families up to $840 a year.

The bulk of tax relief will go to those with incomes in the two lowest tax brackets whose total taxable income is under $114,750 in 2025, with nearly half of the relief benefitting Canadians in the first bracket (taxable income $57,375 and below in 2025).

Q. Why is the credit rate applied to most non-refundable tax credits also being lowered?

A. The rate applied to most non-refundable tax credits is linked to the first personal income tax rate to offset the tax on income that was used to pay for the expenses that are recognized by these credits.

The lowest tax rate is used to determine this offsetting amount given that all taxpayers, in every tax bracket, pay tax at the lowest rate on at least a portion of their income. Using the same credit rate for all individuals ensures that our tax system is fair, and that those claiming similar amounts receive the same amount of tax relief, regardless of their income level.

As such, the credit rate will automatically adjust to reflect the lower tax rate of 14.5 per cent for 2025 and 14 per cent starting in 2026.

Background

Canada's personal income tax system has a progressive rate structure where tax rates increase with income. Marginal tax rates currently range from 15 per cent to 33 per cent and bracket thresholds are indexed to inflation so that they keep up with the cost of living.

This measure would reduce the first tax rate, which applies to taxable income of $57,375 and below in 2025, from 15 per cent to 14 per cent.

As income is reported and tax is calculated on an annual basis, to reflect a one-percentage-point cut in the lowest tax rate coming into effect halfway through the year (i.e., on July 1, 2025), the full-year tax rate for 2025 would be 14.5 per cent and the full-year rate for 2026 and future tax years would be 14 per cent. The rate applied to most non-refundable tax credits would continue to be the same as the lowest personal income tax rate. 

This change would benefit nearly 22 million Canadians. Individuals who benefit would receive tax relief of up to $420 in 2026 (the first full year where the rate would be 14 per cent) and two-income families would receive tax relief up to $840.

The Canada Revenue Agency has updated its source deduction tables for the July to December 2025 period so that pay administrators were able to reduce tax withholdings as of July 1. This means that, since July 1, individuals with employment income and other income subject to source deductions could have tax withheld at 14 per cent. Otherwise, individuals would realize this tax relief when they file their 2025 tax returns in spring 2026. 

Part 2 - Amendments to the Excise Tax Act and Related Regulations

First-Time Home Buyers' GST Rebate

Key Messages

  • The First-Time Home Buyers' GST Rebate is intended to help first-time home buyers access the housing market.
  • The measure would eliminate the GST for homes up to $1 million and provide partial GST relief for homes between $1 million and $1.5 million.
  • This measure will save Canadians up to $50,000 on a new home – allowing more young people and families to enter the housing market.

Questions & Answers

Q. Why doesn't the policy apply to recent purchases that have not yet closed?

A. Any time there is a change in policy, there will be people that fall on either side of the change. The approach the Government has taken ensures that the GST relief accords with the dual purpose of the measure – which is to:

  • incentivize first-time home buyers to buy a newly built home by lowering upfront costs; and
  • in turn, encourage developers to increase the supply of new housing to meet the increase in demand.

Providing the rebate to first-time home buyers who have already entered into an agreement would not serve either of these purposes.

This is also the fairest approach. It ensures that home buyers who entered into agreements before the May 27 announcement – and who agreed to a price that would not have reflected the rebate – are all treated equally, regardless of the closing date on their homes.

It would be unfair to extend the rebate to some of those buyers but not others based solely on their closing date.

*Redacted*

Q. What is this measure meant to do?

A. The measure would eliminate the GST for first-time home buyers of homes up to $1 million and reduce the GST for first-time home buyers of homes between $1 million and $1.5 million. This will reduce the upfront cost of buying a new home for these buyers in order to help them enter the housing market.

Q. Why is the measure restricted to first-time home buyers, why not all buyers?

A. The measure is intended to help first-time home buyers enter the housing market, rather than people who already own a home.

Q. Why does the test to determine whether a person is a first-time home buyer only look back four years?

A. This timeframe is consistent with that used for the other federal tax measures including the First Home Savings Account, the Home Buyers' Plan, and the Homebuyers' Tax Credit and will facilitate administration and compliance.

*Redacted*

Q. What is the government hoping to achieve by removing the GST on new homes for first-time home buyers?

A. This measure could incentivize first-time home buyers to consider buying a newly built home rather than a home in the re-sale market. This increased demand for newly built homes would encourage developers to build more homes to meet this demand, which could in turn have a positive effect on housing supply. Expanding the housing stock is key to addressing housing affordability issues.

Q. Why is the measure temporary?

A. The measure is intended to not only assist first-time home buyers enter the housing market, but also to encourage developers to quickly ramp up supply to meet this demand. The temporary nature of the measure is expected to accelerate this activity to take advantage of the availability of the rebate.

Q. Does this measure also relieve the provincial portion of HST? If not, can provinces choose to relieve the provincial portion of HST?

A. This is a federal rebate that applies only to the 5% GST or federal component of the HST. It does not apply to the provincial component of HST. Questions regarding the provincial component of the HST should be directed to the HST provinces.

Q. How many more units will be built because of the measure?

A. This measure may incentivize first-time home buyers to consider buying a newly built home rather than a home in the re-sale market. This increased demand for newly built homes could encourage developers to build more homes to meet this demand. It would be imprudent to estimate how many additional housing units will be built because of this measure given the many other factors that impact housing supply. However, the measure is expected to have a positive impact on housing supply.

Q. What is the estimated fiscal cost of the measure?

A. This measure is expected to deliver $3.9 billion in tax savings to Canadians over five years, starting in 2025-26.

*Redacted*

Table 1
Estimated Cost
($ millions)
Estimated Cost (in $ millions) 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 Total
First-Time Home Buyers' GST Rebate 0 145 735 950 1,025 1,055 3,910

The cost is lower in the initial years to account for (1) purchase agreements entered into prior to the implementation date that are ineligible for the rebate, and (2) the lag in claims associated with average construction times, as the rebate is only available upon the completion of the unit.

Q. This measure applies to a relatively small number of homes. It only applies to new homes, which are small fraction of a home sales, and then, only those purchased by a first-time home buyer. Will this measure move the needle on housing affordability?

A. It is estimated that at maturity the measure would apply to approximately 47,000 newly built homes annually. This will provide meaningful relief to young Canadians across the country in their pursuit of owning a home.

Q. What about renters—what measures are being taken to support those who aren't looking to buy a home but are struggling with high rents?

A. The government has already introduced a 100% GST rebate for new purpose-built rental housing, which is having a positive impact on the construction of new rental housing. This increased supply of rental units will in turn help make renting more affordable for those who cannot or do not want to own their home.

Q. How does this measure support Canadians in high-cost markets like Vancouver or Toronto versus smaller communities?

A. In addition to fully relieving the GST on new homes up to $1 million, the measure provides a partial GST rebate for homes between $1 million and $1.5 million. This feature of the measure is intended to ensure that the rebate is also available in high-cost markets like in Vancouver and Toronto.

Across Canada, the vast majority of First-Time Home Buyers would qualify for full GST relief since they are generally buying new homes under $1 million—the average home price for a First-Time Home Buyer is around $500,000. 

Background

This measure introduces the First-Time Home Buyers' GST Rebate, which is intended to assist individuals entering the housing market for the first time and to encourage real estate developers to increase housing supply. The rebate would provide 100% relief of the GST on new homes priced up to $1 million and partial GST relief for homes priced between $1 million and $1.5 million. The rebate would provide up to $50,000 of relief on the purchase of a new home by an eligible first-time home buyer.

The measure would generally be available to eligible first-time home buyers, who are individuals that:

  • are at least 18 years of age;
  • are a Canadian citizen or permanent resident; and
  • have not, in the current year or the previous four years, lived in a home owned by either themselves or their spouse/common-law partner as the individual's primary place of residence.

The types of housing for which the relief would apply would be the same types of housing eligible for the existing GST New Housing Rebate, including:

  • detached homes, semi-detached homes, rowhouses, townhomes, and duplexes;
  • residential condominium units;
  • certain shares of cooperative housing corporations; and
  • mobile homes and floating homes.

The measure would generally apply to purchases under agreements entered into on or after May 27, 2025 and to owner-built homes where construction begins on or after May 27, 2025. The measure is temporary and would generally not apply to new housing purchases under an agreement entered into after 2030 or to housing for which construction begins after 2030. 

Part 3 - Amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act and Other Related Texts

Removing the consumer carbon price from Canadian law

Key Messages

  • The proposed amendments would repeal the fuel charge framework under the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act. This follows the regulations made in March that ceased the application of the federal fuel charge, effective April 1, 2025.
  • This repeal would occur in four phases, starting with the retroactive repeal of charging provisions effective April 1, 2025. Other provisions would be sequentially repealed to ensure an orderly process for charge payers with respect to past reporting periods.
  • The proposed legislative amendments would provide certainty to Canadian consumers and businesses about the elimination of the consumer carbon price.

Questions & Answers

Q. Why is legislation needed if the fuel charge application has already been ceased via regulations?

A. Repealing the fuel charge legislative framework under Part I of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (GGPPA) would provide certainty to Canadian consumers and businesses about the permanent elimination of the consumer carbon price.

Q. Why is it necessary to proceed with the repeal in phases rather than all at once?

A. A sequential repeal of the fuel charge provisions would help ensure an orderly process for charge payers. Charge payers will have a further six months to claim rebates to which they are entitled, for example for fuel charge paid on fuel purchased prior to April 1, 2025 but exported on or after that date from a province or territory where the fuel charge applied. Various administrative provisions will remain in the legislation for a longer period to provide continuity and certainty for final wind-down activities, including CRA administrative processes that may continue to rely on existing rules such as definitions. These additional phases of repeal relate to fuel charge obligations for reporting periods prior to April 1, 2025. The fuel charge ceased to apply as of April 1, 2025.

Q. What is the impact of the fuel charge repeal on emissions?

A. As the fuel charge was effectively already removed via regulations made in March 2025, there is no incremental impact on emissions from the proposed legislative amendments.

That said, as indicated in the Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement accompanying the regulations made in March 2025, the Department of Finance Canada, using Environment and Climate Change Canada's emissions data, estimated that the elimination of the fuel charge would lead to a loss of 12.57 Mt cumulative greenhouse gas emissions reductions from 2025 to 2030.

Impacts on emission reductions may be mitigated by other future climate policies implemented in place of the fuel charge. The federal government intends to refocus federal carbon pollution pricing requirements on ensuring carbon pricing systems are in place across Canada on a broad range of greenhouse gas emissions from industry.

Q. What is the impact on inflation of the fuel charge repeal?

A. As the fuel charge was effectively already removed via regulations made in March 2025, there is no incremental impact on inflation from the proposed legislative amendments.

That said, the Department of Finance estimated that eliminating the fuel charge could reduce the Consumer Price Index by about 0.7 percentage point in the first year.

Statistics Canada data showed a year-over-year decrease in CPI in April compared to March, primarily driven by a reduction in energy prices.

Q. After the cessation of the fuel charge, why did the government provide a final Canada Carbon Rebate payment in April 2025 to only residents of provinces where the fuel charge applied?

A. As part of the transition away from the fuel charge, eligible Canadians received a final Canada Carbon Rebate payment in April, 2025.

The government decided to provide this final payment to eligible households in provinces where the federal fuel charge applied because Canadian families, especially low-income families, had been counting on it, and planning their family budgets on the assumption they would be getting it.

The federal fuel charge only applied in provinces that did not have their own systems in place to put a consumer price on pollution, and the majority of proceeds from the federal fuel charge were returned to households in these provinces via the Canada Carbon Rebate.

Background

This measure would permanently repeal the fuel charge framework in Part 1 of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (GGPPA). The measure would legislate the repeal of the consumer carbon price after regulations were made to remove the fuel charge effective April 1, 2025.

The proposed amendments would come into force in four phases to ensure an orderly process for charge payers and the Canada Revenue Agency:

  • In the first phase, charging provisions would be retroactively repealed as of April 1, 2025.
  • In the second phase, provisions allowing for certain rebates would be repealed as of October 1, 2025. For example, this would allow charge payers to claim a rebate for fuel charge paid before April 1, 2025 on fuel that is exported on or after April 1, 2025.
  • All registration provisions would be repealed as of November 1, 2025, giving registrants until October 31 to file returns to claim rebates arising before October 1.
  • All remaining provisions of Part 1 of the GGPPA would be repealed, including definitions, interpretation rules, administrative and procedural rules, effective April 1, 2035. This would provide continuity and certainty for final wind-down activities, including Canada Revenue Agency's processes that continue to rely on existing rules. This continuity also ensures that fuel charge payers have the ability to interact with the government in a predictable and straightforward manner in respect of any residual fuel charge obligations.

The measure does not extend to Part 2 of the GGPPA, which implements an output-based pricing system on large emitters in listed jurisdictions. 

Part 4 - Canada Elections Act

Canada Elections Act

Key Messages

  • In Part 4, Bill C-4 clarifies that the activities of federal political parties involving personal information fall exclusively under federal jurisdiction and the Canada Elections Act.
  • If passed, it would underscore that federal political parties are not required to comply with provincial personal information protection laws and solidify the Canada Elections Act as the exclusive, national and uniform regime regarding the protection of personal information by federal political parties across Canada.
  • It would also clarify that this has been the case since May 31, 2000, which is when the Canada Elections Act was repealed and replaced through a major modernization.
  • Bill C-4 proposes broader requirements for federal policy parties with respect to their privacy policies going forward, covering more than simply data use and collection, and requiring they be available in both official languages and written in plain language.

Questions & Answers

Q. If Bill C-4 is passed, what will be required of federal political parties with respect to privacy?

A. If passed, eligible and registered federal political parties will need to ensure their personal information protection policies (privacy policies) comply with new requirements. For example, privacy policies will need to be updated to be made available in both official languages, written in plain language, and state the types of personal information the party collects, retains, uses, discloses, disposes of, etc. Federal political parties will also be required to explain how they carry out their activities in relation to personal information using illustrative examples.

Q. What happens if someone does not comply with the privacy policy?

A. Federal political parties and those acting on their behalf (e.g., volunteers) will be required to comply or may newly face consequences under the Canada Elections Act's existing enforcement regime, including caution and information letters or, if warranted, an administrative monetary penalty of $50 to $1,500 for a person or $300 to $5,000 for an entity.

Q. Will the Privacy Commissioner have a role?

A. No. Consistent with the regulation of federal political parties through the Canada Elections Act, regulatory oversight would remain with the Chief Electoral Officer and the Commissioner of Canada Elections. The Privacy Commissioner does not have a mandate under the Act. This bill does not change that.

Q. Why are federal political parties not covered by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) or the Privacy Act?

A. PIPEDA applies to organizations engaged in a commercial activity, while the Privacy Act applies to federal government institutions. Because federal political parties are neither engaged in commercial activities nor government institutions, neither legislation governs the personal information practices of federal political parties. As unique democratic actors, Parliament has addressed the personal information practices of federal political parties exclusively under the Canada Elections Act, which governs the registration of federal political parties and regulates their other activities.

Q. Why was this measure included in a tax bill?

A. It was included in the earliest available vehicle to clarify Parliament's intent regarding questions pertaining to federal jurisdiction of privacy requirements for federal political parties.

Q. Why is the regime being made retroactive to 2000?

A. In June 2023, the Canada Elections Act was amended to clarify that it was and remains the national, uniform, exclusive and complete regime for federal political parties' dealings with personal information. However, the 2023 amendment itself was not expressly retroactive despite clear intention on the Government's part. Consequently, Bill C-4 seeks to further clarify Parliament's intention to assert federal jurisdiction over federal political parties' dealings with personal information since 2000, which is when the Act was repealed and replaced through a major modernization.

Q. Why would federal political parties be exempt from complying with provincial personal information protection laws? Is this in response to the ongoing litigation out of British Columbia?

A. In 2022, British Columbia's Information and Privacy Commissioner found that the provincial act, the Personal Information Protection Act, applies to federal political parties in the province. This opens the door to competing authorities and a patchwork of provincial privacy rules applicable to federal political parties, where the obligations of federal political parties vary across jurisdictions, which could lead to uncertainty, inefficiency, confusion, and ultimately an erosion of trust amongst voters in how their personal information is managed. The federal government has been clear that the Canada Elections Act provides a uniform federal approach in respect of federal political parties' activities involving personal information, including but not limited to collection, use, disclosure, retention, and disposal.

Q. Why are the more robust privacy requirements that were part of Bill C-65, which died on the order paper, not included as part of this proposal?

A. The Canada Elections Act is regularly reviewed for improvements, but the priority at this time is to clarify Parliament's intent regarding federal jurisdiction over federal political parties' dealings with personal information.

Background

Bill C-4, An Act respecting certain affordability measures for Canadians and another measure, seeks to clarify Parliament's intent that the activities of federal political parties involving personal information fall exclusively under federal jurisdiction and the Canada Elections Act.

If passed, Bill C-4 would underscore that federal political parties are not required to comply with provincial personal information protection laws, consistent with Parliament's intention that the Canada Elections Act is the exclusive, national, and uniform personal information protection regime for these parties across Canada.

It would further clarify that this has been the case since May 31, 2000, which is when the Canada Elections Act was repealed and replaced through a major modernization.

The bill also proposes additional requirements for a federal political party's privacy policy going forward, including that it: be available in both official languages; be written in plain language; state the types of personal information it collects, retains, uses, discloses, disposes, etc.; and explain how federal political parties carry out their activities in relation to personal information, including using illustrative examples.

Backgrounder: A New Approach to Budgeting

The government is adopting a new way of budgeting that will make capital investment a national priority. The cornerstone of this new budgeting approach is a Capital Budgeting Framework that distinguishes day-to-day operational spending from expenditure that stimulates public and private sector capital investment. Applying this lens in government decision-making will help identify and prioritize actions that support the government's objective of catalyzing $500 billion of incremental private sector investment *redacted*. It will also support two important fiscal objectives for Budget 2025:

  • Balancing day-to-day operating spending with revenues by 2028-29, to shift the composition of overall spending towards capital investments.
  • Maintaining a declining deficit-to-GDP ratio over the forecast horizon, to ensure disciplined fiscal management for future generations.

The framework will be applied to the federal budget, while preserving comparability across different fiscal publications. It is designed to augment—not replace— existing financial reporting. The Public Accounts of Canada will remain fully compliant with Public Sector Accounting Standards, which permit capitalization of costs for assets under government control.

Going forward, the government will also transition to a fall budgeting cycle, starting with Budget 2025. The fall timing, before the Main Estimates, will improve transparency and facilitate the oversight of public expenditure for Parliamentarians. It will also support effective financial planning for federal departments and agencies, provinces and territories, tax experts and businesses. Organizations that rely on federal funding to deliver programs and services to Canadians will also have clarity on available funding ahead of the fiscal year and ahead of the construction season, ensuring projects can get underway without delay. The fall budget will be complemented by an economic and fiscal update in the spring.

The importance of capital formation

Capital investments are the building blocks to economic growth. By improving Canada's productivity, capital investment fosters more—and better paying—jobs, supporting rising living standards over the long-term. However, U.S. business investment has increased steadily, Canada's has struggled, remaining close to its 2015 level (Chart 1). Further, while many countries have accelerated investment in intellectual property, advanced technologies, and modern manufacturing to strengthen their economic potential, Canada's investment has been significantly less concentrated in these types of forward-looking productivity enhancing investments (Chart 2). This lag in investment has constrained innovation, created risks to Canada's competitiveness, and has left the economy less resilient. This investment gap poses a growing challenge in a global economy increasingly shaped by shifting trade dynamics and rapid adoption of artificial intelligence. Without a step-change in capital investment, Canada risks falling further behind. Addressing this requires renewed commitment from both the public and private sectors to make capital investments a national priority. 

Chart 1
Real non-residential business investment since 2000, Canada and U.S, 2000Q1-2025Q2
Chart 1: Real non-residential business investment since 2000, Canada and U.S, 2000Q1-2025Q2

Source: Statistics Canada and Bureau of Economic Analysis. Department of Finance Canada calculations

Text version
Canada U.S.
2000 100 100
2000 101.0594 103.1201
2000 101.0481 104.2466
2000 100.7416 104.6389
2001 102.656 103.7023
2001 103.6332 101.5569
2001 103.9564 100.3544
2001 96.18151 97.46851
2002 94.49655 95.13322
2002 95.80285 94.06367
2002 97.54544 93.75356
2002 97.17034 92.49415
2003 98.85601 92.94981
2003 100.7901 95.51927
2003 104.0065 97.54446
2003 107.0691 98.77223
2004 109.284 97.79761
2004 110.8844 100.2405
2004 113.0164 103.1074
2004 114.7041 105.2275
2005 119.1086 106.7527
2005 121.6828 108.4805
2005 126.9202 110.7398
2005 130.9291 111.5942
2006 132.7301 115.3408
2006 135.4262 117.3533
2006 137.1755 119.3659
2006 137.8126 120.6316
2007 137.5547 122.8024
2007 138.3229 125.53
2007 139.0412 127.4983
2007 141.6719 129.4665
2008 146.656 129.9791
2008 146.8872 130.2449
2008 146.3983 127.8147
2008 139.0446 120.3658
2009 118.4528 111.2968
2009 113.661 107.9109
2009 114.5834 107.2843
2009 117.7465 108.0058
2010 123.9871 108.7716
2010 129.8003 112.3536
2010 134.2139 115.4167
2010 139.7686 117.6761
2011 142.4573 117.5432
2011 146.7371 120.6063
2011 147.9207 126.2831
2011 151.5213 129.5234
2012 154.6123 132.8587
2012 157.4747 135.8585
2012 158.0678 135.4092
2012 160.7102 136.8837
2013 163.5395 138.9975
2013 164.4128 139.7127
2013 165.4586 142.2821
2013 167.5178 145.6996
2014 169.4263 148.0539
2014 170.4512 152.2942
2014 172.3856 155.5914
2014 176.027 156.9458
2015 161.2937 157.0217
2015 154.1772 158.1166
2015 148.7893 159.0785
2015 145.8549 158.3761
2016 138.4338 158.509
2016 136.7409 159.857
2016 137.8108 162.2682
2016 131.7597 163.5719
2017 137.0783 165.2047
2017 139.3307 167.0654
2017 140.4377 168.6729
2017 144.4178 172.7043
2018 146.7612 177.5394
2018 149.0778 179.5519
2018 146.0752 180.6595
2018 146.4854 182.2923
2019 153.5764 183.52
2019 150.1521 187.0135
2019 153.2062 188.8172
2019 150.6165 187.9818
2020 149.852 184.4124
2020 124.5482 169.5842
2020 133.5985 177.0015
2020 137.5436 181.7353
2021 140.5722 185.9313
2021 148.5407 189.95
2021 148.614 189.1146
2021 152.2717 190.7031
2022 154.3359 196.8673
2022 158.8895 200.3607
2022 160.0776 204.1073
2022 158.4254 206.9489
2023 160.9545 209.6576
2023 165.514 214.6446
2023 159.8204 215.2332
2023 155.5381 217.2584
2024 155.4099 219.6696
2024 159.7615 221.7644
2024 156.3847 223.9605
2024 158.1283 222.2897
2025 158.3469 227.8274
2026 155.0682 231.0044
Chart 2
Non-residential investment as a share of GDP, Canada and U.S., 2023
Chart 2: Non-residential investment as a share of GDP, Canada and U.S., 2023

Source: OECD. Department of Finance Canada calculations.

Text version
Total Buildings and structures Machinery and equipment Intellectual property products
Canada 14.9 7.8 3.8 3.3
U.S. 17.4 4.8 5.9 6.8

Capital Budgeting Framework

The new Capital Budgeting Framework establishes a consistent way to classify spending, including tax expenditures, that contribute to capital formation—referred to here as capital investment—while maintaining pre-existing categories used in budgets and financial reports. Drawing on best practices from other advanced economies, and adapted to the Canadian context, it sets out clear, standardized criteria to assess whether a given measure qualifies as capital investment.

Under this framework, capital investment is defined broadly as any government expense or tax expenditure that contributes to public or private sector capital formation, held directly on the government's balance sheet or on that of a private sector entity, Indigenous community or another level of government. Within this broad definition, the intent is to focus on capital investments that meet the following criteria:

  • Conditionality – whether the funding recipient is required to invest in capital formation to receive the benefit.
  • Clear linkage – whether the spending encourages or enables capital investment in identifiable sectors or projects.

Spending that is not categorized as capital investment would be considered day-to-day operating spending. This would include major government expenditures like transfers to persons, health and social transfers, and the costs of running government operations and services, including salaries and benefits. The government is committed to balancing its operating spending with revenues by 2028-29.

Applying the above criteria, government spending classified as capital spending would generally be categorized as follows:

  • Capital transfers - transfers to other levels of government and organizations that are expressly intended for the recipient to invest in infrastructure or a productive asset.
  • Capital-focused corporate income tax incentives - tax expenditures intended to incentivize new capital formation.
  • Capital amortization - expenses recorded to spread the cost of capital assets owned or controlled by the federal government over their useful lives.
  • Private sector research and development - direct funding, or tax incentives, for research and development activities that enable commercialization or scale-up and raise future productive capacity.
  • Support to unlock large-scale private sector capital investment - negotiated agreements with proponents involving exceptional, significant operating subsidies designed to unlock incremental large-scale private capital investments.
  • Incentives to grow the housing stock - measures that accelerate new housing supply.

It is estimated that current projected spending in these categories, before decisions since the 2024 Fall Economic Statement and Budget 2025 measures, is between 1.2 and 1.4% of GDP. Further details will be released in Budget 2025, enabling Canadians to better understand how fiscal choices support future economic capacity.

Public Accounts

As a responsible fiscal manager, the government remains committed to ensuring the objectivity and integrity of its financial statements, which are presented in the Public Accounts of Canada. Results in this form will continue to be based on Canadian public sector accounting standards.

The lens of the new Capital Budgeting Framework will be applied to the federal budget, while preserving the ability for users to compare information across different financial publications, including the Public Accounts of Canada. The budget will continue to include tables categorizing planned spending according to Public Accounts concepts, in order to maintain the ability to compare budgeted amounts with results.

Fall Budgeting Cycle

The transition to a fall budgeting cycle will begin with Budget 2025, and will have the following implications:

  • Pre-budget consultations will now take place in summer.
  • The budget will be delivered in the fall, ahead of the Main Estimates.
  • The budget will be the government's main fiscal event, followed by a spring economic and fiscal update as the new fiscal year begins.

Having a budget in the fall—well ahead of the new fiscal year—will mean:

  • Greater predictability and better planning for organizations, businesses, provincial and territorial budget planners, and Canadians.
  • More budget measures can be included in time for the Main Estimates, enabling parliamentarians to better oversee public expenditures. This responds to calls by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO) and the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) for greater alignment between the budget and Main Estimates, which must be tabled in Parliament by March 1st every year.
  • Additional time for parliamentary consideration of budget legislation for the coming fiscal year.
  • Align better to construction season, ensuring projects can get underway without delay.

The government remains committed to consulting on the implementation of budget measures, including tax and legislation.

Fiscal Anchors

The government will commit itself to two fiscal anchors, and an overarching target, as part of responsible fiscal planning and in recognition of major once-in-a-generation shifts in the global economic order:

  • Balancing day-to-day operating spending with revenues by 2028-29, to shift the composition of overall spending towards capital investments.
  • Maintaining a declining deficit-to-GDP ratio over the forecast horizon, to ensure disciplined fiscal management for future generations.

The fiscal target that will drive this government will be to catalyze $500 billion in private investment through shifting the composition of spending toward capital investment.

Implementation

  • [The 2025 Public Accounts of Canada will be tabled on October [X], 2025.]
  • The release of Budget 2025 on November 4, 2025, will mark a shift to a fall budgeting cycle.
  • Budget 2025 will present and apply the government's new Capital Budgeting Framework.

Related product

  • News Release

Budget Cycle 2025-26

Parliamentary cycle in fall budget scenario, with PT budget timing and traditional construction season.

Table 2
The new fall budgeting cycle*
Before a new fiscal year**
June - Aug Pre-budget consultations
Fall Federal Budget
  Federal Provincial / Territorial***
Feb - April Main estimates Budgets
Main estimates
  Departmental plans
  Interim supply
During the fiscal year
Spring Economic and Fiscal Update
May Supplementary estimates (A)
June - Aug Approval of full supply / End of supply period
Oct - Nov Supplementary estimates (B)
Dec End of supply period
Feb - April Supplementary estimates (C)
Mar End of supply period
After the fiscal year
Spring to fall Traditional construction season
Oct Public Accounts of Canada
Nov Departmental results reports

*Table replicated from the House of Commons' Financial Procedures website ("An Overview of the Financial Cycle"), with date adjustments to reflect the change to a fall budgeting cycle, provincial and territorial budgeting dates, and the timing of the traditional construction season.

**Presently, House of Commons Standing Order 83.1 provides that the Standing Committee on Finance shall conduct a pre-Budget consultations study each September to December. In light of the Government's change to a fall Budget, the House may decide to change its Standing Orders to require the committee to conduct this study in the spring for the following fall Budget.

***Dates vary by province and territory and may occasionally fall outside of these conventional timelines.

Table 3
G7 Budget Dates and Timelines
Country By law (deadline / legal rule) In practice (typical release & passage) Latest Budget (when first presented publically) Next Budget  Budget Approval Window(preliminary scan)
Canada No requirement to publish or table a federal Budget at a specific time or even every year. Budget usually in Feb–Apr. Fall Economic Statement typically later in the year. April  16, 2024. Nov.4, 2025 ~7-9 months after budget tabling.  Many spending authorities tied to Budget items arrive with Supp(A) by June. Further tranches land in December via Supp(B). Main estimates by March 1.
France The PLF (projet de loi de finances) must be tabled no later than the first Tuesday in October at the Assemblée nationale Presented in September at Conseil des ministres; deposited late Sept/early Oct; parliamentary examination Oct–mid-Dec; adoption by Dec 31. Oct. 2, 2025. First draft for the Haut Conseil des finances publiques, presentation to the Assemblée nationale before Oct. 13. NA ~3 months from when the PLF is presented in Sept. at Conseil des ministres. Lois de finances rectificatives (supplementary finance laws) during the year adjust appropriations.
United States The President must submit the budget on/after the first Monday in January and no later than the first Monday in February Generally early February submission; Congress then follows its timetable May 2, 2025.  Administration released an initial ("skinny") FY2026 request; fuller volumes followed later in May/June. NA ~8 months after Budget submission, deadline is end of fiscal year (Sept. 30). In practice, it generally slips into the following months.
United Kingdom No fixed statutory "Budget Day". The Office for Budget Responsibility must produce forecasts at least twice per financial year. Since 2017, the main Budget is in the autumn; a Spring Statement normally provides the mid-year update. Oct 30, 2024. Autumn Budget 2024 presented to Parliament. Nov. 26,2025 ~7-8 months after budget tabling. Main estimates published in April and approved in July. Supplementary Estimates are still normally presented in February for within-year changes—then debated/voted in early March
Germany The federal budget is established by law before the fiscal year begins (no fixed tabling day). Cabinet adopts draft in summer; Bundestag holds first reading in September ("Haushaltswoche"); final adoption typically by December. July 30, 2025. The federal cabinet adopted the government draft for the 2026 federal budget and the fiscal plan to 2029. NA ~3 months from first reading. Possible to amend the budget when significant changes are needed during the year. Provisional management permitted if the Budget Act is not in force.
Italy Government must present the state budget bill to Parliament by 20 October. If not approved by 31 December, Parliament may grant provisional exercise up to four months. Cabinet approval in October, parliamentary passage by end-December (also alongside EU Draft Budgetary Plan process in October). Oct. 15, 2024. Council of Ministers approved the 2025 Budget Bill; press communication released that evening, followed by a detailed press conference on Oct 16. Mid-Oct., 2025 ~2 to 2.5 months. If late, provisional exercise allowed up to 4 months by law. Assestamento (mid-year adjustment) and decreto-legge measures (later converted) can change appropriations during the year.
Japan The Cabinet prepares and submits the budget to the Diet (no fixed calendar date in law). The ordinary Diet session convenes in January to consider the budget. Cabinet approves the draft in late December, submits in January; enactment by end-March before the April 1 fiscal year. Dec. 27, 2024. Cabinet approved the FY2025 draft budget  (Submitted to the Diet with minister's speeches on Jan 24, 2025.). NA ~2 months from budget submission in Jan. Supplementary budgets are common within the fiscal year; Diet must pass them like the main budget.

Timing of Federal and PT Budgets

Key Facts and Figures

Timing of Federal Budgets and Estimates

  • While there is no legislated timeline, the federal budget is conventionally tabled in February or March, with some exceptions particularly in recent years.
  • Release dates for the Estimates follow the supply calendar:
    • Period ending June 23: Usually considers full supply of Main Estimates which, under House of Commons Standing Orders, must be tabled by March 1 each year and Supplementary Estimates (A).
    • Period ending December 10: Considers Supplementary Estimates (B).
    • Period ending March 26: Considers Supplementary Estimates (C) and interim for Main Estimates.

Timing of PT Budgets and Estimates

  • Provincial and territorial governments have their own fiscal cycles and schedules.
  • Budget dates generally vary within an 8-week period, with March being the most typical month.
  • The Main Estimates are released annually, generally either at the same time as budgets or shortly thereafter.
  • Supplementary Estimates are released as needed throughout the year. They are rare for some jurisdictions. In some instances, they may be published along with periodic economic and fiscal updates rather than stand-alone documents.

Supplementary Information

Table 4
Timing of Recent Federal Budgets
Year Budget Date BIA Introduction Date
2011 6-Jun-2011 14-Jun-2011
2012 29-Mar-2012 26-Apr-2012
2013 21-Mar-2013 29-Apr-2013
2014 11-Feb-2014 28-Mar-2014
2015 21-Apr-2015 7-May-2015
2016 22-Mar-2016 20-Apr-2016
2017 22-Mar-2017 11-Apr-2017
2018 27-Feb-2018 27-Mar-2018
2019 19-Mar-2019 8-Apr-2019
2021 19-Apr-2021 30-Apr-2021
2022 7-Apr-2022 28-Apr-2022
2023 28-Mar-2023 20-Apr-2023
2024 16-Apr-2024 2-May-2024
Figure 1
Overview of the annual approval and reporting cycle
Figure 1: Overview of the annual approval and reporting cycle
Figure 2
Typical Provincial Budget Dates
Figure 2: Typical Provincial Budget Dates

Notes: The date ranges above are typical dates, except for some one-time deviations due to provincial general elections or tariff-related uncertainty in the spring of 2025.

Text version
  • Northwest Territories: February
  • British Columbia: February
  • Alberta: February
  • Nunavut: February
  • Nova Scotia: February to March
  • Prince Edward Island: February to April
  • Yukon: March
  • Manitoba: March
  • Newfoundland and Labrador: March to April
  • Ontario: March
  • Quebec: March
  • Saskatchewan: March
  • New Brunswick: March
Table 5
Publication Dates of Budgets, Estimates and Public Accounts for PTs
  2023 2024 2025
British Columbia
Budget
28-Feb 22-Feb 04-Mar
Main estimates
28-Feb 22-Feb 04-Mar
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts
29-Aug 22-Aug 07-Aug
Alberta
Budget
28-Feb Feb-29 27-Feb
Main estimates
28-Feb Feb-29 27-Feb
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts
29-Jun 27-Jun 27-Jun
Saskatchewan
Budget
22-Mar 20-Mar 19-Mar
Main estimates
22-Mar 20-Mar 19-Mar
Supplementary Estimates
05-Dec
Public Accounts
29-Jun 27-Jun 30-Jun
Manitoba
Budget
07-Mar 02-Apr 20-Mar
Main estimates
07-Mar 02-Apr 20-Mar
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts
29-Sep 27-Sep 26-Sep
Ontario
Budget 23-Mar 26-Mar 15-May
Main estimates 20-Apr 17-Apr 04-Jun
Supplementary Estimates 29-Nov
Public Accounts 27-Sep 19-Sep 26-Sep
Quebec
Budget 21-Mar 12-Mar 25-Mar
Main estimates 20-Mar 12-Mar 25-Mar
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts 11-Dec 02-Oct 26-Sep
New Brunswick
Budget 22-Mar 19-Mar 18-Mar
Main estimates 22-Mar 19-Mar 18-Mar
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts 27-Sep 16-Sep N/A
Nova Scotia
Budget 23-Mar Feb-29 18-Feb
Main estimates 23-Mar Feb-29 18-Feb
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts 12-Sep 26-Jul 22-Sep
Prince Edward Island
Budget 25-May Feb-29 10-Apr
Main estimates 25-May Feb-29 10-Apr
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts 06-Nov 11-Oct N/A
Newfoundland and Labrador
Budget 23-Mar 20-Mar 09-Apr
Main estimates 23-Mar 20-Mar 09-Apr
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts 30-Oct 29-Oct N/A
Yukon
Budget 02-Mar 07-Mar 06-Mar
Main estimates 02-Mar 07-Mar 06-Mar
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts 21-Nov 24-Oct N/A
Northwest Territories
Budget 08-Feb 24-May 06-Feb
Main estimates 08-Feb 24-May 06-Feb
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts 19-Dec 15-Nov N/A
Nunavut
Budget 23-Feb 26-Feb 24-Feb
Main estimates 23-Feb 26-Feb 24-Feb
Supplementary Estimates
Public Accounts 07-May 20-Dec N/A
Table 6
Notes About Statutory Requirement for PTs
Province Notes
British Columbia The budget must be delivered on (or before) the fourth Tuesday of February unless an election year, and the main estimates also have to be tabled on or before that same date.
Alberta Under the Financial Administration Act (FAA), the Government of Alberta is required to prepare and table its budget in the Legislative Assembly. While the FAA does not prescribe a specific date for tabling the budget, it mandates that the budget, known as the "Estimates," be tabled before the end of February each year.
Ontario The estimates are required to be tabled within 12 sessional days of the budget." (Schedule of estimates | Legislative Assembly of Ontario)
Yukon The Financial Administration Act requires that the Public Accounts be tabled by October 31.
Northwest Territories The Financial Administration Act mandates that the Government of the Northwest Territories prepare and table its public accounts in the Legislative Assembly on or before December 31 following the end of the fiscal year; or if the Legislative Assembly is not then in session, on or before the fifth day of the next sitting of the Legislative Assembly.

Affordability Measures

Key Facts and Figures

  • The government is helping Canadian families (approximately 900,000 children) save thousands of dollars with the Canada-wide $10-a-day child care system, which created 166,000 new child care spaces since 2021.
  • The Canada Child Benefit is helping roughly 3.5 million families with the costs of raising children by providing $28.2 billion in 2024-25.
  • The recently expanded Canadian Dental Care Plan is saving the average person enrolled more than $800 per year. Over 4.8 million Canadians have enrolled in the Plan, and over 2 million are already receiving essential care.
  • The National School Food Program will provide meals to up to 400,000 more kids every year, saving the average participating family with two children $800 per year in grocery costs, with lower-income families benefitting the most.
  • Over the past few years, the government has modernized Canada's competition regime to strengthen competition in our economy. Stronger competition is expected to lead to lower prices, improved services for consumers, and more innovation in the marketplace.
  • Access to contraceptive and diabetes medications for Canadians has been expanded, beginning with those in Manitoba, British Columbia, Prince Edward Island, and the Yukon.

Supplementary Information

Canada-wide Early Learning and Child Care

As part of Budget 2021 the Government committed to build a Canada-wide ELCC system with PTs.  Key targets that PTs have committed to through bilateral agreements under the Canada-wide system include: 

  • Reduce fees for regulated child care by 50% by December 2022 (completed); 
  • Reduce fees for regulated child care to an average of $10-a-day by March 2026; and 
  • Build 250,000 new regulated child care spaces by March 2026. 

Majority of PTs are on track to meet these targets by the end of their agreements on March 31, 2026. The majority have signed extension agreements for 2026-27 to 2030-31, which provide them with a 3 per cent funding top-up to sustain their systems without any additional targets. Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario have not yet signed extension agreements.

As of March 31, 2026, the Government will have provided over $35 billion for ELCC, including for Indigenous ELCC, and committed to ongoing funding of $9.2 billion annually

Canada Child Benefit

For the 2024-25 benefit year, the Canada Child Benefit provides up to $7,787 per child under the age of 6 and up to $6,570 per child aged 6 through 17. The Government provided about $28 billion in support to eligible families with children under this benefit in 2024-25. The Canada Child Benefit is legislated through the Income Tax Act and is considered an expenditure for government financial reporting purposes.

Pharmacare

Budget 2024 provided $1.5 billion over five years to support the launch of the National Pharmacare Plan. The Pharmacare Act outlines the government's vision for a national universal pharmacare program and its intention to work with PTs to implement the first phase of the program by providing universal, single-payer coverage for contraception and diabetes medications. To date Manitoba, British Columbia, Prince Edward Island and the Yukon have signed pharmacare agreements. Funding expands and enhances existing PT public drug benefit programs.

Canadian Dental Care Plan

The dental care plan is helping make the cost of dental care more affordable for eligible Canadians. The program is restricted to uninsured Canadians with a family income of less than $90,000, with no co-pays for families under $70,000. The program first launched in 2023 and was initially restricted to seniors. Program eligibility gradually expanded to persons with disabilities, children under the age of 18, and then individuals between the ages of 18 to 64. As of May 29, 2025, all eligible uninsured Canadians of all ages can apply.

National School Food Program

In Budget 2024, the Government of Canada committed $1 billion of federal funding over 5 years through Budget 2024 to develop a National School Food Program. This funding was allocated for bilaterial funding agreements with PTs, funding for school food initiatives on First Nations reserves and for First Nations, Inuit and Métis Modern Treaty and Self-government Agreement Holders, and engagement/capacity building activities related to school food.

As of March 2025, all PTs have signed agreements under the National School Food Program. The federal government is working directly with Indigenous partners on the rollout of their funding, with more information to come.

Modernizing the Competition Framework

Through the Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023 and the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act, the Government of Canada amended the Competition Act in order to help:

  • Put an end to big businesses, including grocers, leveraging contracts and leases to stifle competition;
  • Stop anti-competitive mergers that raise prices and limit choices for Canadians;
  • Crack down on anti-competitive practices by large dominant companies that drive up prices;
  • Improve the focus on worker impacts in competition analysis; and,
  • Prevent manufacturers from refusing to provide the means to repair devices in an anti-competitive manner.

Building Canada Act and Major Projects Office

Key Facts and Figures

  • The new Major Projects Office (MPO) was launched on August 29 and is being led by CEO Dawn L. Farrell, who brings decades of experience across energy, infrastructure, regulatory strategy, and governance fields.
  • The MPO is headquartered in Calgary and will have offices in other major Canadian cities.
  • Its mandate is to serve as a single point of contact to get nation-building projects built faster. It will do so in two principal ways:
    • First, by streamlining and accelerating regulatory approval processes.
    • Second, by helping to structure and co-ordinate financing of these projects as needed.
  • On September 11, the first five projects were referred to the MPO. These projects are at an advanced stage of readiness. The MPO will recommend to the federal government the best course to complete each project approval quickly so proponents can make smart investment decisions. (See supplementary information for a list of the projects)
  • Also on September 11, the government announced six project that it believes could be truly transformative, which are at an earlier stage and require further development. (See supplementary information for a list of the projects)
  • The government stated it will announce a new series of projects being referred to the MPO by the Grey Cup (November 10-16).
  • The government announced on September 10 the new membership of the Indigenous Advisory Council that will support the MPO by providing expert advice on policy, operational practices, and process improvements related to the inclusion of Indigenous perspectives on and interests in major projects.

Supplementary Information

First projects to be reviewed by the new Major Projects Office

  • On September 11, 2025, Canada announced the first series of projects being referred to the MPO for consideration:
    • LNG Canada Phase 2, Kitimat, British Columbia: This project will double LNG Canada's production of liquefied natural gas. It will diversify our trading partners and meet increasing global demand for secure, low-carbon energy with Canadian LNG
    • Darlington New Nuclear Project, Bowmanville, Ontario: This project will make Canada the first G7 country to have an operational small modular reactor (SMR), a key technology that could support Canadian and global clean energy needs.
    • Contrecœur Terminal Container Project, Contrecœur, Québec: This project will expand the Port of Montréal's capacity by approximately 60%, to give Eastern Canada the trading infrastructure it needs to diversify trade routes.
    • McIlvenna Bay Foran Copper Mine Project, East-Central Saskatchewan: This project will supply copper and zinc to strengthen Canada's position as a global supplier of critical minerals.
    • Red Chris Mine expansion, Northwest British Columbia: This major expansion project will extend the lifespan of the mine by over a decade, increase Canada's annual copper production by over 15%, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by over 70% when operational.
  • In addition to the five projects above, the government has identified several projects that could be truly transformative for this country, which are at an earlier stage and require further development:
    • Critical Minerals:  A priority for the MPO will be to help more critical minerals projects get to final investment decisions within a two-year window.
    • Wind West Atlantic Energy: A project that will leverage over 60 GW of wind power potential in Nova Scotia, and more across Atlantic Canada, connecting that renewable, emissions-free energy to Eastern and Atlantic Canada to meet rapidly growing demand.
    • Pathways Plus: An Alberta-based carbon capture, utilization, and storage project and pipeline that will substantially reduce emissions and create the prospect of facilitating low-carbon oil exports from the Alberta oil sands to a variety of potential markets.
    • Arctic Economic and Security Corridor: An all-weather, dual-use, land and port-to-port-to-port infrastructure project that will contribute to Canada's defence and northern development. The project will support Northern critical mineral projects and connect communities to the rest of Canada.
    • Port of Churchill Plus: In partnership with Indigenous Peoples, this project will upgrade the Port of Churchill and expand trade corridors with an all-weather road, an upgraded rail line, a new energy corridor, and marine ice-breaking capacity to turn the Port of Churchill into a major four‑season and dual-use gateway for the region.
    • Alto High-Speed Rail: Canada's first high-speed railway, spanning approximately 1,000 km from Toronto to Québec City. The MPO will work to enable construction of the project to start in four years, cutting the original eight-year timeline in half.

Comprehensive Expenditure Review

Key Facts and Figures

  • The Government of Canada is undertaking a Comprehensive Expenditure Review (CER) to balance the government's operating budget over the next three years.
  • Organizations are reviewing their programs and activities and submitting savings proposals of up to 15% of their assigned spending base, which is drawn from planned spending in the 2025-26 Main Estimates.
  • Statutory transfer payments to provinces, territories and individuals will be maintained, but most other government spending will be included in the review.
  • Final decisions will be presented in the 2026-27 Main Estimates.

Supplementary Information

  • Spending on government operations has grown at an unsustainable rate. To address this, the Government committed to balancing its operating budget over the next three years. The CER will ensure that government spending is sustainable and directed to programs and activities that are cost-effective, core the federal mandate, complementary to other government programming and aligned with government priorities. While the primary intent is to realize savings, this review also aims to make the public service more efficient and effective so it can better deliver for Canadians. 
  • The process applies to federally appropriated organizations, with the following exceptions:
    • agents of parliament and arms-length organizations to preserve their independence, and
    • cost-recovered organizations, because including them would not generate savings.
  • The review focusses on voted operating and transfer payments.  Capital budgets, such as for infrastructure and technology, are not included. Organizations will need to develop savings proposals for up to 15% of their assigned spending base, which is drawn from planned spending in the 2025-26 Main Estimates.
  • Departments are expected to bring forward ambitious savings proposals to spend less on the day-to-day running of government by targeting programs and activities that are underperforming, not core to the federal mandate, duplicative, or misaligned with government priorities.
  • The government is taking a broad approach to the review that also recognizes the importance of key investments being made in certain areas. As such, the government is setting a lower savings target of 2% for the Department of National Defence, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).
  • Unrealized savings from the Budget 2024 Refocusing Government Spending initiative starting 2026-27 are included in the savings targets of this review.
  • All departments must develop their proposals using Gender-Based Analysis Plus to identify how the benefits of programs are distributed across diverse groups of Canadians. This will help us better understand how people, particularly those most in need, would be impacted by particular decisions.
  • Departments will respect Workforce Adjustment provisions and will aim to minimize the number of impacted employees by using all HR planning tools at their disposal, which include attrition and assisting employees in securing alternative positions within the federal public service. 

Canada-U.S. Trade and Tariffs

Key Facts and Figures

  • The United States reaffirmed a core commitment to CUSMA by reinforcing that Canadian exports to the U.S. that are compliant with CUSMA are not subject to the U.S. IEEPA tariffs of 35%.
  • The U.S. maintains tariffs on Canadian exports in strategic sectors – 50% on Canadian steel, aluminum, and copper products, and 25% on Canadian autos.
  • New tariffs on lumber (10%) and upholstered furniture and kitchen cabinets (25%) will take effect in mid-October. The President has also announced tariffs on trucks and branded pharmaceutical products.
  • The government has applied tariffs on imports from the U.S. to defend our interests. Effective September 1, given the U.S. commitment to exempt CUSMA-compliant goods, the government recalibrated the approach by removing tariffs on all goods, with the exception of steel, aluminum, and autos.
    • To date, more than $2.5 billion in revenues have been collected from Canadian tariffs.
  • The government continues to work with the U.S. to address U.S. tariffs in the strategic sectors where tariffs remain in place.
  • On September 17, the United States Trade Representative initiated a 45-day consultation period for the review of USMCA. Global Affairs Canada launched on September 20 a new round of consultations to get the latest views from Canadian stakeholders.

Supplementary Information

U.S. tariffs

The U.S. has imposed the following tariffs on Canada:

  • 25 per cent tariff on non-CUSMA compliant autos as well as on the value of non-U.S. content in CUSMA-compliant autos.
    • CUSMA-compliant auto parts from Canada are currently exempt from a 25 per cent U.S. tariff. 
  • 50 per cent on steel and aluminum and derivative products (increased from 25 per cent on June 4, 2025);
  • 50 per cent on certain copper products;
  • 10 per cent on timber and softwood lumber, 25 per cent on upholstered furniture (increasing to 30% in 2026), and 25 per cent on kitchen cabinets and vanities (increasing to 50% in 2026). These tariffs will take effect on October 14, 2025; and
  • 35 per cent on all goods (except 10 per cent on energy resources, including critical minerals, and potash) that do not meet CUSMA rules of origin (increased from 25 percent on August 1, 2025).
    • The U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the President exceeded his authority by imposing tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Supreme Court accepted the U.S. Administration's petition to review the rulings on an expedited basis in Fall 2025 and could issue a judgment before the end of 2025.
  • The President has also announced tariffs of 25% on heavy-duty trucks and 100% on branded pharmaceutical products. The legal instruments to give effect to these tariffs have not yet been issued as of October 1, 2025.
  • The U.S. has also initiated additional Section 232 investigations on the following sectors, which could result in additional tariffs: (1) semi-conductors; (2) processed critical minerals; (3) commercial aircrafts and jet engines; (4) polysilicon; (5) unmanned aircraft systems; (6) wind turbines; (7) robotics and industrial machinery; and (8) personal protective equipment and medical equipment. The government continues to monitor these investigations. 

Canadian counter-tariffs

Canada imposed counter-tariffs affecting approximately $95 billion of annual imports from the U.S., including steel, aluminum, and other products. Canada's response on autos mirror the U.S. auto tariffs in the form of a 25 per cent to non-CUSMA compliant vehicles from the U.S., as well as the non-Canadian and non-Mexican content of CUSMA-compliant vehicles from the U.S. 

  • Effective September 1, the government removed the counter-tariffs on $44.7 billion of annual imports from the U.S., while maintaining those on steel, aluminum and autos.

To minimize the negative effects of the counter-tariffs, the government established a remission framework to provide exceptional tariff relief on a case-by-case basis. More broadly, the government also provided a temporary six-month tariff relief (remission), until October 15, 2025, for goods imported from the U.S. by listed entities that support public health, public safety, and national security. Remission of tariffs is also provided for goods used in manufacturing, processing, or food and beverage packaging to give time for Canadian businesses to adjust their supply chains and prioritize domestic sources of supply if available.

For autos, the government provided a performance-based remission framework that allows automakers to import a certain number of U.S.-assembled, CUSMA-compliant vehicles into Canada, free of the counter-tariffs. This remission is contingent on the automakers continuing to produce vehicles in Canada and on completing planned investments. The number of tariff-free vehicles a company is permitted to import will be reduced if there are reductions in Canadian production or investment. The framework will remain in force until April 2026.

Revenues from counter-tariffs

As of the end of September, the government collected more than $2.5 billion, net of remissions and other relief programs, from Canada's counter-tariffs on U.S. goods.

CUSMA review

On September 17, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) initiated a 45-day consultation period for the review of USMCA, which will include the submission of written comments and public hearings. USTR is required to report to Congress in early January 2026 its assessment of how USMCA has been operating, its policy recommendations, the U.S. position on whether to extend the agreement, and actions it proposes to take at the review. 

In Fall 2024, Global Affairs Canada (GAC) conducted public consultations regarding the USMCA. Stakeholders commonly expressed the view of "preserving" and "strengthening" the USMCA. On September 20, GAC launched another 45-day consultation on the review of the USMCA to gather the latest views.

Mexico also launched its consultation on September 17, with comments accepted until November 16.

Chinese and Other Tariffs

Key Facts and Figures

  • China imposed retaliatory tariffs in March 2025, including 100 per cent tariffs on Canadian canola oil, canola meal, and peas, and 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian pork, fish, and seafood products in response to Canada's October 2024 tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (100 per cent) and steel and aluminum products (25 per cent).
  • In addition, on August 12, China announced preliminary anti-dumping duties of 76 per cent on Canadian canola seed and 26-41 per cent on halogenated butyl rubber, along with initiating an anti-dumping investigation on Canadian pea starch. These actions responded to new Canadian measures on steel imports from all countries introduced in July 2025.
  • Canada adopted its trade measures in response to long-standing Chinese non-market policies and unfair trade practices that sustain global overcapacity in these sectors, posing a threat to Canadian industry.
  • Since the imposition of the 100 per cent tariffs in March 2025, Canadian exports of canola meal and oil to China are down by almost 80 per cent. *Redacted*
  • Pork exports to China have seen lesser declines, and exports of seafood products have been highly variable – while exports to China are generally down, some products have seen increases, or success moving into other markets.
  • The federal government is working to find a diplomatic solution with China, including through senior level political and officials engagement. In June and September 2025, Prime Minister Carney held discussions with Chinese Premier Li Qiang. Both leaders agreed to work together, including through the Joint Economic and Trade Commission (JETC), to address outstanding trade issues.

Supplementary Information

Canada's tariffs on China

Effective October 15, 2024, Canada imposed a 100 per cent surtax on imports of EVs from China, as well as 25 per cent surtaxes on imports of steel and aluminum products from China. The government is currently undertaking a review of these surtaxes, as it committed to doing so after one year at the time of implementation.

Canada's tariffs on certain steel and aluminum imports

Effective July 31, 2025, Canada imposed 25 per cent tariffs on imports of certain goods from all non-U.S. countries containing steel melted and poured in China or aluminum smelted and cast in China when entering Canada.

Effective June 27, and amended August 1, 2025, Canada implemented new tariff rate quotas (TRQs) on steel mill products from all non-CUSMA trading partners. As part of the August 1 amendments, Canada tightened the TRQs, setting the quotas for non-FTA partners at 50 per cent of 2024 import volumes and established TRQs for imports from FTA partners (except the U.S. and Mexico) at 100 per cent of 2024 import volumes. Out-of-quota imports are subject to a 50 per cent tariff.

China's tariffs on Canada

  • 100 per cent tariffs on Canadian canola oil, canola meal (oilcake), and peas, effective March 20, 2025;
  • 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian pork, fish, and seafood products (including shellfish and fish oil), effective March 20, 2025;
  • 26 per cent to 41 per cent preliminary anti-dumping duties on Canadian halogenated butyl rubber, effective August 11, 2025;
  • 8 per cent preliminary tariff on Canadian canola seed, effective August 15, 2025, following China's anti-dumping investigation; and
  • China has also initiated an anti-dumping investigation into Canadian pea starch imports as of August 2025.

Final determinations for canola seeds and rubber were expected in September 2025, but on September 5, China announced the extension of its investigations for another six months (to be concluded in March 2026).

Impacts on the Canadian economy

*Redacted*

Canola producers have registered significant concern as to the potential economic impacts of these tariffs, with some estimating the total losses to the sector as potentially exceeding $4 billion in 2025. *Redacted*

Federal support for affected industries

In March 2025, the government proactively announced revisions to business risk management programs to help mitigate the impact of losses due to market disruptions. This included raising the compensation rate under AgriStability from 80 to 90 per cent and doubling the current payment cap from $3 million to $6 million (for the current year). In addition, Farm Credit Canada announced up to $1 billion in liquidity through its 'Trade Disruption Customer Support Program'.

On September 5, the federal government announced additional measures to support all sectors impacted by tariffs. This included a new biofuel production incentive, with over $370 million for domestic producers to address competitiveness challenges and amending Clean Fuel Regulations to support the domestic biofuels industry (including canola), and a further increase to the Advance Payments Program interest-free limit, to $500,000 for canola advances for the 2025 program year. $75 million was announced for the AgriMarketing Program to support diversification for agricultural and seafood products, in addition to expanding support for small and medium-sized enterprises through the Regional Tariff Response Initiative.

Combatting Financial Crimes (Anti-Money Laundering Measures)

Key Facts and Figures

  • Since 2019, the government has invested close to $379 million to combat money laundering and terrorist financing.
  • Every Budget since 2019 has included measures to strengthen Canada's anti-money laundering and anti-terrorist financing (AML/ATF) framework.
  • Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, proposes a comprehensive set of amendments to enhance AML/ATF supervision, compliance, and enforcement; punish serious criminal non-compliance, enhance information sharing, and address some of the most prevalent types of money laundering.

Supplementary Information

The government is working on many fronts to fight financial crime, including by investing in enforcement, providing new tools for law enforcement, strengthening AML/ATF compliance and supervision, improving information sharing, demonstrating international leadership, and launching new and innovative partnerships to detect, deter, and disrupt complex financial crimes:

  • Launched the Integrated Money Laundering Partnership (IMLIP) in February 2025. The IMLIP is a public-private partnership between the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canada's six Domestic Systemically Important Banks (DSIBs) to target sophisticated money laundering schemes and organized crime. IMLIP meets regularly and the next Steering Committee meeting will be in October *redacted*.
  • Created the Joint Operational Intelligence Cell to expediate the effective flow of intelligence to support law enforcement in Canada and abroad in their fight against transnational organized crime, money laundering, border security, and drug-trafficking.
  • Established a Canada-U.S. Joint Strike Force to combat organized crime, fentanyl and money laundering that will provide dedicated and specialist resources to support joint efforts to detect and disrupt fentanyl trafficking and its organized crime and money laundering enablers.
  • Delivered a G7 Financial Crimes Call to Action by leveraging Canada's G7 presidency to lead international efforts to strengthen AML reforms and fight financial crime.
  • Concluded a Memorandum of Understanding with U.S. regulators to ensure strong AML controls of cross-border banks.  
  • Announced in the 2023 Fall Economic Statement support for a new approach to tackling financial crime. Budget 2024 allocated $1.7 million over two years to the Department of Finance to consider options to strengthen Canada's enforcement of financial crime laws. Finance continues policy work on a new approach to financial crime enforcement to improve operational results and tackle serious and complex financial crime in Canada.

Anticipated Questions and Answers

  1. Will the government bring forward the AML/ATF measures announced in the 2024 Fall Economic Statement?

    Yes, the government has brought forward the AML/ATF measures announced in the 2024 Fall Economic Statement as part of Bill C-2, Strong Borders Act.

  2. Is the government still planning to pursue a Canada Financial Crimes Agency, originally announced in Budget 2022?

    As announced in Budget 2024, the Department of Finance received $1.7 million over two years to work on options for designing a Canada Financial Crimes Agency. The Department will continue to undertake policy analysis to improve financial crimes enforcement in Canada.

  3. What is the government doing to respond to the United States' concerns that money laundering is among the drivers of the fentanyl crisis which has resulted in tariffs on Canadian goods?

    The government is taking action to fight money laundering that supports and perpetuates fentanyl trafficking.

    In February 2025, the government launched the Integrated Money Laundering Intelligence Partnership (IMLIP) between law enforcement and Canada's big banks to improve information sharing and better detect, deter, and disrupt money laundering.

    In March 2025, the government issued a letter directing the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre (FINTRAC) to mobilize resources to respond to the illicit financing that enables the fentanyl trade.

    In the G7 Finance Ministers meeting, ministers agreed to a joint communiqué which included a Financial Crimes Call to Action.

    Bill C-2 proposes a comprehensive set of measures to fight financial crime including by strengthening AML/ATF administrative monetary penalties; enhancing AML/ATF supervision and compliance, punishing serious criminal non-compliance, enhancing information sharing, and addressing some of the most prevalent types of money laundering. 

Defence Spending (incl. Ukraine)

Key Facts and Figures

  • In 2014-15, Canada's defence spending was roughly 1 per cent of GDP. Building up Canada's defence capabilities has been an important priority since then.
  • Thanks to previously announced investments, Canada was already on track to triple defence spending from 2014-15 to 2027-28.
  • In June, the Government of Canada announced a plan to further increase investments in defence. This plan includes $9.3 billion in 2025-26 (cash basis) to reach 2 per cent of GDP.
  • Spending will be directed at rebuilding the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), defending Canada's sovereignty, procuring more military equipment, and making smart investments to support Canadian industry and workers.
  • This includes better compensation and benefits for CAF members, including the largest pay raise in a generation.
  • This plan includes $2 billion in military assistance to Ukraine in 2025-26. Since 2022, Canada has committed $6.6 billion in military assistance to Ukraine to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia's continued illegal invasion.
  • There is a moral imperative to support Ukraine in its reconstruction and Canada can play a major role when it comes to sectors like energy, opening up opportunities for Canadian companies in an increasingly competitive space.
  • Last week, the government announced the creation of the new Defence Investment Agency, which will overhaul and streamline Canada's defence procurement and help build domestic manufacturing and supply chains, so that the CAF have the world-class equipment they need.

If pressed on future defence investment beyond 2025-26

  • The announcement in June was about making a historic investment in the Canadian Armed Forces and reaching 2 per cent of GDP this fiscal year. As the Prime Minister said, Canada will exceed 2 per cent of GDP in future years recognizing the government's NATO commitments. Additional details will be provided in in Budget 2025.

Supplementary Information

Defence Spending

NATO Allies have been working towards accelerating their defence spending to reach 2 per cent of GDP by 2025. On June 9, the government announced a plan to increase its investments in defence. This builds on the commitments made last year in Canada's renewed defence policy, Our North, Strong and Free, to strengthen Canada's sovereignty, security, and prosperity, and drive economic growth in this period of uncertainty.

The plan includes $9.3 billion ($8.3 billion on an accrual basis) in defence spending in fiscal year 2025-26 — bringing Canada's defence spending to 2 per cent of gross domestic product this fiscal year. The plan includes foundational investments in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), and investments to expand and enhance existing and emerging military capabilities, strengthen Canada's relationship with the defence industry, and diversify defence partnerships.

Continued Support to Ukraine

The plan announced on June 9 includes $2 billion in 2025-26 for military assistance for Ukraine. 

Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Canada has now committed $22.0 billion in multifaceted support, including financial, military, humanitarian, and other types of assistance to Ukraine. This includes $6.6 billion in military assistance to Ukraine.

Additionally, since 2015, the CAF have provided training on a range of military skills to over 40,000 Ukrainian troops through Operation UNIFIER.

Improved Compensation for the Canadian Armed Forces

  • On August 8, the Prime Minister announced increases in pay and incentives to revitalize recruitment and retention efforts and bolster force readiness. These new measures include:
    • Increases on top of base pay retroactive to April 1, 2025, which will result in a 20 per cent increase in starting pay for privates in the Regular Force;
    • A new Military Service Pay benefit specifically tied to time in service; and,
    • Additional compensation initiatives to be rolled out over the next 12 months, including support for frequent moves and separation from families, raises to help CAF members training for combat, and additional pay for CAF members who serve in natural disasters.

Defence Investment Agency

  • On October 2, the Prime Minister announced the creation of the new Defence Investment Agency, which will overhaul and streamline Canada's defence procurement by:
    • Consolidating procurement processes through removing red tape to accelerate procurement and provide industry with greater clarity and certainty;
    • Better integrating procurement with domestic industrial benefits to create new careers, grow our economy, and supercharge innovation in aerospace, shipbuilding, and advanced manufacturing; and,
    • Ensuring earlier engagement between the CAF and Canada's defence industry, to enable industry to better anticipate future needs of the military and build industrial capacity ahead of time, at speed and scale.

Debt Management Strategy

Key Facts and Figures

  • Based on projections from the 2024 Fall Economic Statement and measures announced since that statement, as of June 9, 2025, the domestic borrowing program is expected to be close to $610 billion in 2025–26, the vast majority of which is to refinance maturing debt.
  • Canada's debt program retains the flexibility to absorb additional funding needs through 2025-26.
  • Projected borrowing remains well within the legislated limit of $2,126 billion under the Borrowing Authority Act, and the $733 billion annual borrowing limit set by the Governor-in-Council.
  • Primary and secondary markets for the Government of Canada continue to function very well and benefit from strong investor demand.

Supplementary Information

  1. Will this borrowing impact Canada's AAA credit rating?

    Canada remains among the top-rated countries in the G7. Credit
    rating agencies have been assessing issuers in light of global macroeconomic and fiscal conditions, and we have an ongoing dialogue with our ratings agencies. All major credit rating agencies have affirmed Canada's rating over the last number of months.

    The IMF's April 2025 World Economic Outlook noted it expects Canada's net general government debt-to-GDP ratio to remain by far the lowest among G7 countries.

  2. When will the Debt Management Strategy be published?

    The Debt Management Strategy was released on July 16, 2025 which satisfies the requirement in the Financial Administration Act that it be published within 30 sitting days after the start of the fiscal year. 

    The department is preparing a revised Debt Management Strategy for release with Budget 2025.

  3. Why are borrowing needs projected to be so high in 2025-26?

    Refinancing needs represent approximately 80 per cent of borrowing needs.

    Refinancing needs in this fiscal year are driven by 5-year bonds issued during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  4. What is the amount ofoutstanding debt stock under the BAA as of March 2025?

    As of March 31, 2025, the debt stock under the BAA was estimated at $1,788 billion.

    The maximum debt stock under the BAA includes the Government of Canada debt securities, borrowings from agent Crown corporations and Canada Mortgage Bonds (CMBs) not held by the Government of Canada.

  5. There has been a lot of bond market turmoil internationally. How is Canada fairing?

    Government securities auctions continue to function well, supporting overall strong and orderly financial markets.

    Government of Canada yields continue to be lower than US Treasury yields with 30 year Government of Canada yields trading 100 basis points below those of the US. Although this spread has narrowed through 2025, this differential reflects the relative strength of the Canadian economic and fiscal story. Anecdotally, investors appear to be very comfortable with Canada and both the primary and secondary markets are functioning well.

  6. Will the government issue a Transition Bond?

    The Department of Finance is scoping out a potential path for transition bonds.

Draft Legislation on Previously Announced Tax Measures

Key Facts and Figures

Supplementary Information

Enhanced CRA Audit Powers

  • Budget 2024 announced proposed amendments to the current information gathering powers in the Income Tax Act and other federal tax statutes to enhance CRA's statutory audit powers and strengthen the CRA's ability to combat aggressive tax avoidance. These amendments would provide the CRA with broader audit powers to more easily obtain information, including through a new penalty for non-compliance.
  • The 2018 Report of the Office of the Auditor General noted that the provision of information by some taxpayers lagged for months or even years, making it more difficult for the CRA to collect tax owing. These proposed amendments are intended to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of tax audits and facilitate the collection of tax revenues on a timelier basis. These proposed amendments would come into force on royal assent of enacting legislation.

Exceptions to the EIFEL Rules for Purpose-Built Rental Housing and Regulated Energy Utility Businesses in Canada

  • The EIFEL rules are an integrity measure designed to prevent erosion of the Canadian tax base by limiting excessive interest deductions. They apply to taxation years that begin on or after October 1, 2023. While interest is normally deductible, some multinational enterprises have used excessive debt or financing arrangements to reduce their Canadian taxes. The rules generally cap deductible interest at 30% of "tax EBITDA" – taxable income before interest, income tax, and certain deductions – and implement Canada's Budget 2021 commitment to align with international peers and the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action 4 recommendations.
  • The EIFEL framework includes multiple relieving mechanisms available across all sectors. These include a group-ratio rule (allowing higher deductions based on global third-party leverage), an exception for certain "Canadian-only" groups with limited base erosion risk, and other adjustments for small or de minimis taxpayers.
  • Budget 2024 and a subsequent release introduced two targeted exceptions. The first, released in Budget 2024, applies to interest and financing expenses incurred before January 1, 2036, on arm's length borrowings used directly to build or acquire purpose-built rental housing in Canada or convert property into purpose-built rental housing in Canada. The second, announced on August 12, 2024, applies to interest and financing expenses on borrowings used directly to fund a Canadian regulated energy utility business, which includes activities such as the production, generation, storage, transmission, distribution, sale, delivery, or provision of electricity, natural gas, steam, or other energy inputs, where prices are established or approved by a government entity.

$10 Million Capital Gains Exemption for Qualifying Sales of Businesses to Worker Cooperatives or Employee Ownership Trusts

  • An Employee Ownership Trust (EOT) owns shares of a business on behalf of its employees, enabling greater worker participation in business decisions and profits. Worker cooperatives are another form of collective employee ownership model, structured as a cooperative corporation. EOTs and worker cooperatives provide an alternative business succession option for retiring business owners, especially since more than 75 per cent of small business owners plan to exit their business in the next decade.
  • The 2023 Fall Economic Statement proposed a capital gains exemption on the first $10 million in capital gains realized on the sale of a business to an EOT to encourage more business owners to sell to EOTs. This exemption became law on June 20, 2024 (bill C-69) and is in effect for the 2024, 2025, and 2026 tax years.
  • Budget 2024 proposed to extend this temporary capital gains exemption for sales to worker cooperatives. The proposed amendments to both the EOT and worker cooperative exemptions included in the August 15, 2025, release were generally of a technical nature in response to stakeholder submissions.

Technical Proposals Relating to GST/HST and Excise Levies

  • The measures are mostly relieving in nature and non-controversial. However, one measure would allow input tax credits for redeemed coupons to be available only for payments made exclusively in the course of commercial activities.
    • A Federal Court of Appeal decision, President's Choice Bank v. The King has allowed financial institutions to claim input tax credits under the GST/HST coupon rules related to loyalty points issued for using financial products, such as credit cards.
    • This decision is contrary to the policy that financial institutions are generally not eligible to claim input tax credits in respect of their exempt financial services.
    • The proposed amendment ensures that this policy is maintained and protects the GST/HST revenue base.

Economic and Fiscal Overview

Key Facts and Figures

  • U.S. tariffs and ongoing trade uncertainty are starting to weigh on our economy, disrupting trade flows, dampening business investment, and contributing to job losses.
  • These impacts are showing up in the numbers: real GDP was essentially flat in the first half of 2025, and the unemployment rate rose to 7.1% in August, with job losses concentrated in trade-exposed sectors.
  • While the outlook for real and nominal GDP has been revised down significantly since the 2024 Fall Economic Statement (FES 2024), private sector economists do not expect the Canadian economy to experience a recession.
  • We are monitoring this closely, and our focus remains on supporting those directly impacted by U.S. tariffs, keeping investment flowing, and strengthening supply chains at home.
  • Budget 2025 will be tabled on November 4. It will be ambitious in its investments and disciplined in its spending. Guided by the principle of spending less to invest more, the government will lay out its plan to balance its day-to-day operating spending with revenues. This will enable generational investments to grow our economy while keeping deficits as a share of the economy on a downward trajectory.
  • Budget 2025 will also present the government's new approach to budgeting that distinguishes—and shifts toward—spending that stimulates public and private sector capital formation. This will augment, not replace, existing reporting. The Public Accounts of Canada will continue to follow Public Sector Accounting Standards.

Supplementary Information

  • Despite some resilience in consumer spending, real GDP nearly stalled in the first half of the year, with notable weakness in exports and business investment.
  • Due to U.S. tariffs and ongoing trade uncertainty, private sector economists have cut their real GDP growth forecasts to around 1% in both 2025 and 2026, well below the FES 2024 outlook (1.9 per cent and 2.1 per cent respectively). However, private sector economists do not expect the Canadian economy to experience a recession.
  • Reflecting these downward revisions to real GDP, the level of nominal GDP is expected to be substantially lower than the FES 2024 projection.
  • The 2024-25 budgetary deficit and federal debt-to-GDP ratio published in the March Fiscal Monitor are lower than the projection in the 2024 Fall Economic Statement and the Parliamentary Budget Office's (PBO) projection in its September 2025 Economic and Fiscal Outlook.
  • For the first four months of the 2025-26 fiscal year, there was a budgetary deficit of $7.8 billion, compared to a deficit of $7.3 billion reported for the same period of 2024-25.
  • The first four months offers limited insights for the outcome of the year as a whole, due in part to volatility in the timing of revenues and expenses, and ongoing trade uncertainty.
Table 7
($ millions)
  2024-25
  March 2025 Fiscal Monitor 2024 Fall Economic Statement PBO Economic and Fiscal Outlook - September 2025
Budgetary balance ($ billions) -43.2 -48.3 -51.7
Federal debt (per cent of GDP) 41.4 41.9 41.7
Note: The March Fiscal Monitor was published in May and provides year-to-date data for 2024-25 as of March 31st. Additional estimations and adjustments are made through the closing process for the annual Public Accounts.
  • The PBO Economic and Fiscal Outlook was released on September 25. It projects that the deficit to increase in 2025-26, to $68.5 billion (2.2 per cent of GDP) reflecting weaker economic growth and additional measures which reduce revenues and increase expenses. The deficit is projected to decline to 1.6 per cent of GDP ($59.2 billion) in 2030-31.
  • The PBO expects the federal debt-to-GDP ratio to be 42.5 per cent of GDP in 2025-26 and to increase steadily thereafter, reaching 43.7 per cent in 2028-29 and onwards. Based on this projection, the federal debt-to-GDP ratio will no longer be on a declining path over the forecast horizon (2024-25 to 2030-31).

Canada Key Financial Metrics

  • Nominal GDP
    • (Statistics Canada 2025 Q2): $3.2 Trillion
  • Real GDP growth
    • (July 2025): 0.2%
    • (2025 Q2, annualized): -1.6%
  • Inflation rate
    • (August 2025): 1.9%
  • Federal debt
    • (FES 2024 Forecast for 2025-26): $1.32 T
  • Unemployment rate
    • (August 2025): 7.1%
  • Revenues
    • (FES 2024 Forecast for 2025-26): $516.2 B
  • Expenses
    • (FES 2024 Forecast for 2025-26): $558.3 B
  • Budgetary deficit
    • (FES 2024 Forecast for 2025-26): -$42.2 B
  • Debt charges-to-GDP
    • (FES 2024 Forecast for 2025-26): 1.7%
  • Federal debt-to-GDP
    • (FES 2024 Forecast for 2025-26): 41.7%
  • Deficit-to-GDP
    • (FES 2024 Forecast for 2025-26): 1.3%

G7 Fiscal Comparison

Key Facts and Figures

  • Canada maintains the smallest deficit-to-GDP ratio in the G7.
    • According to the IMF's April Fiscal Monitor Canada's general government deficit is projected to fall from 2.1% of GDP in 2024 to 1.9% of GDP in 2025. It is expected to decline further to 1.6% in 2026 and reach just 0.8% by 2030.
  • Canada's net debt-to-GDP ratio is by far the lowest among G7 countries and lower than some other AAA countries such as the Netherlands and Australia.
    • Canada's net debt-to-GDP ratio is projected to edge up in 2025 (from 11.9% in 2024 to 12.5%)—as it will for every G7 country save for Japan. It is then expected to reach 14.2% by 2029, before resuming its decline in 2030.
  • Canada's net debt burden is still lower today than in any other G7 country prior to the pandemic.
  • Canada is also one of only two G7 economies, along with Germany, to have a AAA rating from at least two of the three major global credit rating agencies.
  • Canada's strong fiscal position means we have the capacity to respond to economic challenges with confidence—supporting Canadians today while investing in a more resilient, competitive, and inclusive economy for the future.

Supplementary Information

Based on the IMF's April 2025 Fiscal Monitor (an update will be coming in mid-October), at 2.2 per cent of GDP in 2024, Canada's deficit was the smallest in the G7 (Table 8). Canada's projected net debt-to-GDP ratio for 2024 is 11.9 per cent, compared to the G7 average, excluding Canada, of 100.4 per cent (Table 9). In terms of gross debt, which excludes Canada's large financial assets, Canada ranks 3rd in the G7. Its gross debt is expected to edge up to 112.5% of GDP in 2025 before declining throughout the rest of the forecast horizon and reach 104.1% of GDP by 2030. This will leave the gross debt-to-GDP ratio 13.9 percentage points above its pre-pandemic level.

Canada's fiscal situation also compares very well to a broader group of 30 other advanced economy peers, with deficit- and net debt-to-GDP ratios among the lowest (Charts 1 and 2). This represents a sharp contrast with Canada's fiscal situation during the 1980s and early 1990s when the accumulation of relatively large deficits led to a rapid rise in Canada's net debt burden and a deteriorating fiscal advantage relative to many advanced economy peers.

Table 8
General Government Budgetary Balance—G7 and AAA Countries
% of GDP
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Canada Among G7 Countries
Canada -0.02 -10.9 -3.1 0.6 0.1 -2.2 -1.9 -1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8
Japan -3.0 -9.1 -6.1 -4.2 -2.3 -2.5 -2.9 -3.1 -3.3 -4.0 -4.6 -5.3
Germany 1.3 -4.4 -3.2 -2.1 -2.5 -2.8 -3.0 -3.5 -3.9 -4.1 -4.3 -4.4
Italy -1.5 -9.4 -8.9 -8.1 -7.2 -3.4 -3.3 -2.8 -2.6 -2.4 -2.5 -2.5
United Kingdom -2.5 -13.2 -7.7 -4.6 -6.1 -5.7 -4.4 -3.7 -3.1 -2.8 -2.6 -2.3
France -2.4 -8.9 -6.6 -4.7 -5.4 -5.8 -5.5 -5.9 -6.1 -6.1 -6.0 -6.1
United States -5.8 -14.1 -11.4 -3.7 -7.2 -7.3 -6.5 -5.5 -5.4 -5.6 -5.5 -5.6
Canada Among AAA Countries
Norway 6.5 -2.6 10.3 25.5 16.6 12.8 13.2 11.3 10.8 10.5 10.1 9.7
Denmark 4.3 0.4 4.1 3.4 3.3 4.5 1.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 -0.1 -0.5
Switzerland 1.3 -3.0 -0.3 1.2 0.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
Luxembourg 2.7 -3.1 1.0 0.2 -0.8 1.0 -0.8 -1.3 -1.4 -1.9 -2.1 -2.1
Sweden 0.4 -3.2 -0.1 1.0 -0.8 -1.7 -1.4 -0.7 0.1 -0.0 -0.0 0.0
Canada -0.02 -10.9 -3.1 0.6 0.1 -2.1 -1.9 -1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8
Netherlands 1.8 -3.6 -2.2 0.0 -0.4 -1.1 -1.9 -2.7 -2.0 -2.2 -2.6 -2.7
Australia -4.4 -8.7 -6.4 -2.2 -0.9 -2.2 -2.6 -1.6 -1.3 -1.5 -1.8 -2.0
Germany 1.3 -4.4 -3.2 -2.1 -2.5 -2.8 -3.0 -3.5 -3.9 -4.1 -4.3 -4.4
IMF projections are on a National Accounts General Government basis, which includes the federal, provincial, territorial and local governments, as well as the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans. The general government forecast is not directly comparable to federal budget projections. Source: IMF Fiscal Monitor April 2025.
Table 9
General Government Net Debt—G7 and AAA Countries
% of GDP
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Canada Among G7 Countries
Canada 8.7 16.3 14.2 13.6 14.4 11.9 12.5 13.2 13.6 13.9 14.2 14.1
Germany 39.8 45.3 46.3 46.3 46.2 47.7 49.6 51.6 53.7 56.0 58.6 61.3
U. Kingdom 75.8 93.1 91.7 89.8 91.8 93.7 95.1 96.4 97.1 97.5 97.4 97.0
United States 81.1 95.6 95.5 91.6 94.0 96.5 98.0 99.2 100.4 101.4 102.7 104.0
France 89.0 101.6 100.5 101.1 101.6 105.0 108.2 111.0 113.5 115.8 118.0 120.3
Italy 121.4 140.9 133.6 127.1 124.1 125.1 127.3 128.8 129.2 129.0 128.8 129.0
Japan 151.6 162.0 156.0 149.5 136.0 134.6 134.2 134.3 134.2 134.8 136.2 138.1
Canada Among AAA Countries
Norway -74.2 -79.0 -83.1 -63.6 -110.6 -154.6 -163.3 -169.0 -173.7 -178.1 -182.1 -185.3
Denmark 12.3 14.5 9.0 4.7 1.5 -3.1 -4.2 -4.6 -4.9 -5.0 -4.7 -4.1
Luxembourg -14.1 -10.5 -10.7 -7.8 -6.1 -5.6 -4.0 -2.2 -0.5 1.3 3.0 4.4
Sweden 5.7 9.4 8.6 8.9 8.1 10.2 12.1 13.1 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.1
Canada 8.7 16.3 14.2 13.6 14.4 11.9 12.5 13.2 13.6 13.9 14.2 14.1
Switzerland 17.3 20.4 20.5 16.7 18.2 17.1 16.4 15.5 14.6 13.6 12.8 11.9
Australia 27.9 36.1 35.6 31.5 29.5 30.1 31.8 31.5 30.7 30.2 30.1 30.1
Netherlands 39.2 44.0 41.6 39.8 37.2 35.6 35.7 36.6 36.9 37.4 38.4 39.3
Germany 39.8 45.3 46.3 46.3 46.2 47.7 49.6 51.6 53.7 56.0 58.6 61.3
Note: For each variable, countries are ranked according to their 2025 projected figures. IMF projections are on a National Accounts General Government basis, which includes the federal, provincial, territorial and local governments, as well as the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans. The general government forecast is not directly comparable to federal budget projections. For net debt, negative numbers mean a net asset position. Source: IMF Fiscal Monitor April 2025.
Chart 1
IMF General Government Net Debt, Canada and 30 Other Advanced Economies
Chart 1: IMF General Government Net Debt, Canada and 30 Other Advanced Economies

Notes: The internationally comparable definition of "general government" includes the central, state, and local levels of government, as well as social security funds. For Canada, this includes the federal, provincial, territorial, and local and Indigenous government sectors, as well as the Canada Pension Plan and the Quebec Pension Plan. For greater readability, budgetary balance data points for Ireland in 2010 (-32.1) and for Iceland in 2016 (12.5) have been excluded from the other advanced economies range calculations. Norway, a statistical outlier due to its significant net asset position (+154.6 of GDP in 2024), has been excluded from the group.

Source: International Monetary Fund, April 2025 Fiscal Monitor.

Text version
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025F 2026F 2027F 2028F 2029F 2030F
Range of 30 Other Advanced Economies 45.0 40.8 56.7 48.2 147.7 119.8 93.9 69.0 81.3 83.5 87.0 87.1 89.1 96.9 100.5 96.6 109.8 107.5 119.4 107.7 101.1 101.9 130.2 130.2 126.6 123.0 122.8 121.3 127.7 139.7 142.0 151.6 154.6 152.2 156.2 156.9 161.5 159.8 162.9 165.7 172.5 166.7 157.3 142.1 140.2 138.4 138.9 139.2 139.9 140.9 142.3
Canada 14.5 13.6 19.2 25.7 29.6 35.3 39.6 39.3 38.3 41.4 43.9 50.3 56.7 62.1 66.2 66.7 65.9 61.5 57.5 50.5 42.0 40.3 38.9 35.4 34.6 29.3 25.0 22.1 22.7 26.8 28.2 28.9 28.5 26.7 21.7 18.5 18.0 12.7 11.7 8.7 16.3 14.2 13.6 14.4 11.9 12.5 13.2 13.6 13.9 14.2 14.1
Chart 2
IMF General Government Budgetary Balance, Canada and 30 Other Advanced Economies
Chart 2: IMF General Government Budgetary Balance, Canada and 30 Other Advanced Economies

Notes: The internationally comparable definition of "general government" includes the central, state, and local levels of government, as well as social security funds. For Canada, this includes the federal, provincial, territorial, and local and Indigenous government sectors, as well as the Canada Pension Plan and the Quebec Pension Plan. For greater readability, budgetary balance data points for Ireland in 2010 (-32.1) and for Iceland in 2016 (12.5) have been excluded from the other advanced economies range calculations. Norway, a statistical outlier due to its significant net asset position (+154.6 of GDP in 2024), has been excluded from the group.

Source: International Monetary Fund, April 2025 Fiscal Monitor.

Text version
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025F 2026F 2027F 2028F 2029F 2030F
Range of 30 Other Advanced Economies 12.6 20.8 15.2 15.4 13.9 12.9 13.6 12.1 15.5 18.1 17.8 12.8 10.7 9.3 10.8 16.0 12.3 10.5 13.0 14.6 19.4 12.9 12.2 11.1 10.6 11.3 10.5 8.6 16.3 14.4 13.0 15.2 13.1 12.1 8.7 6.6 6.2 6.9 8.5 10.1 14.5 15.5 11.6 10.5 12.8 8.2 7.5 7.5 8.1 8.6 9.0
Canada -4.0 -2.9 -6.9 -8.0 -7.9 -8.8 -7.3 -5.7 -4.5 -4.7 -5.9 -8.4 -9.2 -8.9 -6.9 -5.5 -3.1 0.0 0.1 1.7 2.6 0.5 -0.2 -0.1 0.8 1.6 1.8 1.8 0.2 -3.9 -4.7 -3.3 -2.5 -1.5 0.2 -0.1 -0.5 -0.1 0.4 0.0 -10.9 -3.1 0.6 0.1 -2.2 -1.9 -1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8

Grocery Affordability / Food Inflation

Key Facts and Figures

  • Food inflation remains elevated across many advanced economies—this is not unique to Canada.
  • Recent common cost pressures include rising shipping costs, severe weather disrupting key crops and pushing up commodity prices, and currency depreciation against the U.S. dollar in late 2024, which increased import costs.
  • Canada is not immune, but we are taking action—with targeted affordability measures and efforts to strengthen supply chains here at home.
  • The federal government is pursuing a multi-pronged approach to help make groceries more affordable for Canadians, including:
    • Modernizing the Competition Act to support a more competitive marketplace and help stabilize prices.
    • Advancing the Canada Grocery Sector Code of Conduct to help bring more fairness, transparency, and predictability to Canada's grocery supply chain and for consumers.
    • Enhancing food price transparency by expanding access to data through the Food Price Data Hub.

Supplementary Information

Higher food prices are a global phenomenon

Canada's peak food price inflation of 10.4 percent in January 2023 was the second lowest in the G7, next to Japan.

Food inflation has averaged 2.6 percent over the first eight months of 2025 –the third lowest in the G7 (Table 10). That said, at 3.4 per cent in August 2025, food price inflation remains elevated relative to historic norms (2012-2019 historical average of 2.1 per cent).

Drivers of recent food price inflation include:

  • Canadian dollar depreciation in late 2024 and early 2025, which raised the cost of imported food.
  • An increase in prices of agricultural commodity and livestock prices over the past year, including severe weather disrupting crops for commodities such as coffee and cocoa
  • Spikes in global shipping costs at the end of last year contributing to higher input costs.
  • Elevated distribution and processing costs, such as energy inputs and labour costs.

While many of these pressures have eased more recently, their lagged effects continue to filter through to consumer prices.

Table 10
Latest G7 Food Price Inflation
per cent, year-over-year
Country Per cent
France 1.0
Germany 2.1
US 3.2
Canada 3.4
Italy 3.4
UK 4.8
Japan 6.5
1 September 2025 for Germany and Italy, August 2025 for all other countries

Modernizing the Competition Framework

Through the Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023 and the Affordable Housing and Groceries Act, the Government of Canada amended the Competition Act in order to help:

  • Put an end to big businesses, including grocers, leveraging contracts and leases to stifle competition;
  • Stop anti-competitive mergers that raise prices and limit choices for Canadians;
  • Crack down on anti-competitive practices by large dominant companies that drive up prices;
  • Improve the focus on worker impacts in competition analysis; and,
  • Prevent manufacturers from refusing to provide the means to repair devices in an anti-competitive manner.

Grocery Sector Code of Conduct

To ensure that Canada has a resilient and competitive grocery supply chain that benefits everyone, the government also sees a major role for a grocery code of conduct in improving predictability, transparency, and the principles of fair dealing.

In July 2024, the Government announced that all major retailers had agreed to join the Grocery Sector Code of Conduct. In January 2025, the Office of the Grocery Sector Code of Conduct announced the appointment of Karen Proud as President and Adjudicator of the Office of the Grocery Sector Code of Conduct.

The Code is expected to be fully operational as of January 1, 2026. A formal Dispute Resolution Management Process is also expected to be implemented starting January 1, 2026. More details on this process are expected in Fall 2025.

Other government initiatives to support grocery affordability

In November 2023, the government launched the Food Price Data Hub which provides Canadians with detailed information on food prices and helps consumers make informed decisions about their food purchases. The Food Price Data Hub is a collaboration between Statistics Canada, Industry, Science and Economic Development and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

Budget 2024 provided $14.9 million over three years, starting in 2024-25, for the Northern Isolated Community Initiatives (NICI) fund to the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency, Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions, and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency.

NICI fund supports food and agriculture businesses, as well as other public and private organizations. Investments from NICI support new and existing food initiatives aimed at strengthening and diversifying economic activity in the North. Projects that address food security in Indigenous communities or with other vulnerable people are given priority.

Housing Affordability

Key Facts and Figures

  • Our government has committed to making homes more affordable for Canadians. That is why one of our first actions was to table legislation to eliminate the GST for first-time home buyers on homes up to $1 million and to reduce the GST on homes between $1 million and $1.5 million.
  • We have also committed to doubling the pace of residential construction over the next decade. To do this, we will create Build Canada Homes to catalyze the housing industry by providing financing and land, while sustaining demand for manufacturers through bulk purchasing.
  • This builds on efforts and investments made in recent years, including to reduce local barriers to build, support more development through the tax system such as the removal of GST on purpose-built rental housing, and significantly increasing financing available to builders.
  • In parallel, the government has taken steps to align permanent and temporary immigration more closely with housing capacity, such as reducing permanent resident targets by 21 per cent in 2025 and maintaining lower admissions through 2027, and capping the total number of foreign workers and international students to less than five percent of Canada's population by 2027.

Supplementary Information

The government's platform included a number of significant commitments, such as to:

  • Launch Build Canada Homes;
  • Eliminate the GST for first-time home buyers on new homes priced up to $1 million and lower the GST for first-time buyers on homes between $1 million and $1.5 million;
  • Reintroduce the Multi-Unit Rental Building (MURB) tax incentive;
  • Cut municipal charges in half for multi-unit residential housing for five years by working with provinces and territories; and
  • Return immigration to sustainable levels to ease the strain on housing, public infrastructure, and social services.

The federal government has invested heavily in housing in recent years, including through the measures below.

Budget 2024

  • Launching a new Public Lands for Homes Plan, including a $500 million Public Lands Acquisition Fund.
  • A further $15 billion in loan funding for purpose-built rentals under the Apartment Construction Loan Program, beginning in 2025-26. Combined with FES 2023 investments, this brings total program funding to over $55 billion, with the goal of supporting over 131,000 homes.
  • Providing $6 billion over 10 years, starting in 2024-25, to launch a new Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund, to accelerate the construction and upgrading of housing-enabling infrastructure.
  • Topping up the $4 billion Housing Accelerator Fund with an additional $400 million over four years, beginning in 2024-25, in order to fast-track 12,000 additional homes.
  • A further $1 billion in funding for the Affordable Housing Fund. This brings total program funding to over $15 billion, with the goal of supporting 60,000 new housing units and renewing / repairing another 240,000.
  • Announcing a new $1.5 billion Canada Rental Protection Fund to preserve and grow affordable housing supply.
  • Investing $1.3 billion over four years, starting in 2024-25, in Reaching Home: Canada's Homelessness Strategy.
  • Announcing $1.1 billion over five years, beginning in 2024-25, for an accelerated capital cost allowance for new purpose-built rental projects.

2023 Fall Economic Statement

  • $15 billion in loan funding for purpose-built rentals under the Apartment Construction Loan Program beginning in 2025-26.
  • $4.565 billion over six years to remove the GST from purpose-built rental housing beginning in 2023-24.
  • $1 billion in contributions for the Affordable Housing Fund (AHF) beginning in 2025-26.
  • $50 million to support municipal enforcement of restrictions on short-term rentals.
  • Denial of expenses in computing income from a non-compliant short-term rental.
  • $309 million in additional investments for the Co-Operative Housing Development Program beginning in 2025-26.
  • Canadian Mortgage Charter, which highlights the tailored mortgage relief that the government expects banks to provide to borrowers who are facing financial difficulty with the mortgage on their principal residence (further enhanced in Budget 2024).

Managing Immigration

  • The government has also taken steps to align permanent and temporary immigration more closely with housing capacity.
    • The 2025–2027 Immigration Levels Plan reduces Canada's permanent resident targets by 21% in 2025 and maintains lower admissions through 2027: 395,000 in 2025, 380,00 in 2026, and 365,000 in 2027.
    • The speech from the throne confirmed the government's intention to cap the total number of foreign workers and international students to less than five percent of Canada's population by 2027.
      • According to Statistics Canada, there were 3.0 million non-permanent residents living in Canada on January 1, 2025 (i.e. work and study permit holders and their family members, and asylum claimants), accounting for 7.3 per cent of the overall population.
  • Updated immigration targets and other measures introduced in 2024 to slow the pace of immigration-driven population growth are beginning to ease pressure on housing demand.

Pre-Budget Consultations 2025

Key Facts and Figures

  • From July 15 to September 3, the Government of Canada held pre-budget consultations in 26 cities across the country, hosting nearly 50 roundtables and 60 bilateral meetings with stakeholders.
  • Discussions touched on internal trade, labour mobility, the impact of U.S. tariffs, manufacturing and innovation, immigration, and affordable housing.
  • Nearly 84,075 Canadians shared their views about the upcoming budget in an online survey, launched on July 14.

Supplementary Information

  • The government conducted nationwide consultations ahead of Budget 2025 to help set out the federal government's plan to support Canadians and Canadian businesses during this time of heightened global challenges, while building the strongest economy in the G7.
  • The Minister of Finance and National Revenue, Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions), and Parliamentary Secretaries Ryan Turnbull and Rachel Bendayan met with a wide range of stakeholders including workers, business leaders, Indigenous communities, unions, and innovators.
  • From July 14 to August 28, nearly 84,075 Canadians participated in an online survey to share their views for the upcoming budget. Their input focused on building one strong economy, reducing everyday costs, and bolstering Canada's defence and security.
  • On August 23, the Minister of Finance and National Revenue announced on CTV News that the federal budget would be tabled in October 2025. The Prime Minister has further stated that it will be "an austerity and investment budget".

Committee Member Biographies

About the Committee

The mandate of the Standing Committee on Finance, as established under Standing Order 108 of the Standing Orders of the House of Commons, is to examine and enquire into all matters referred to it by the House and to send for persons, papers, and records, as it operates in accordance with its mandate.

Standing committees are empowered to study and report on all matters relating to the mandate, management and operation of the department or departments of government that are assigned to them from time to time by the House. For the Standing Committee on Finance, these include the Department of Finance and the Canada Revenue Agency.

The committee also has the responsibility to consider budgetary policy, as outlined in Standing Order 83.1, including studies on proposals for the government's budgetary policy and the budget itself. The committee normally undertakes its pre-budget consultations during the first sitting week of September and presents its report by the third last sitting day in December, as outlined in Standing Order 28(2).

In each parliamentary session, the committee's work may include:

  • pre-budget consultations;
  • briefing sessions by departmental officials on federal programs;
  • examination of planned expenditures of the Department of Finance and the Canada Revenue Agency;
  • a review of Order in Council appointments;
  • a review of Monetary Policy Reports of the Governor of the Bank of Canada;
  • a review of the Minister of Finance's economic and fiscal updates;
  • consideration of proposed legislation;
  • special studies on topics within the committee's mandate; and
  • consideration of reports of subcommittees.

Conservative Party

Sandra Cobena

Sandra Cobena
Conservative, Newmarket—Aurora (Ontario)

Biography

Sandra Cobena was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Newmarket—Aurora in 2025.

Before entering politics, Ms. Cobena worked as a senior manager at TD Bank. Her professional background includes advising Ontario-based companies on a wide range of financial strategies related to mergers, acquisitions, growth, and restructuring.

Ms. Cobena immigrated to Canada from Ecuador as a teenager. She holds a master's degree in management from the London School of Economics and a combined honours degree in global commerce and finance from Western University.

Overview of Issues Raised

In the House, Ms. Cobena has spoken about affordability concerns, economic growth, and support for law enforcement to ensure community safety.

Jasraj Singh Hallan

Jasraj Singh Hallan, Vice-Chair
Conservative, Calgary East (Alberta)
Opposition Critic for Finance

Biography

Jasraj Singh Hallan has been the Member of Parliament for Calgary East since 2019. He is the Opposition Critic for Finance—continuing this role from the 44th Parliament.

Before his role as finance critic, he served as Opposition Critic for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship from 2021 to 2022. In that role, Mr. Hallan's parliamentary activities largely focused on issues related to Canada's immigration system, application backlogs and processing time, and temporary foreign workers.

Mr. Hallan was raised in northeast Calgary, where he earned an accounting diploma from the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology. He has a certified Master Builder designation and ran a homebuilding business in Calgary.

Overview of Issues Raised

Mr. Hallan's questions have focused on the government's management of the economy and its impact on living standards (i.e., affordability and GDP per capita), productivity levels, and job creation. Last session, he initiated a study in committee on the impact of inflation and interest rates on mortgages.

Mr. Hallan has also expressed interest in Canada's energy and natural resources sectors, namely oil and gas. He has questioned government regulation of the sector and the impact of phasing out fossil fuels on the economy and workers. In line with his party's position, Mr. Hallan has advocated for repealing the Impact Assessment Act and Canadian Energy Regulator Act, and Oil Tanker Moratorium Act.

Private Members' Bills and Motions

In the 43rd Parliament, Mr. Hallan introduced Bill C-304, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (grooming), which dropped from the Order Paper with the 2021 election. The bill aimed to make grooming an aggravating factor when a court imposes a sentence for certain sexual offences. It would also consider grooming as a practice where the offender has communications or conducts relations with victims with the intention of leading them to participate in the offence.

Pat Kelly

Pat Kelly
Conservative, Calgary Crowfoot (Alberta)

Biography

Pat Kelly has been the Member of Parliament for Calgary Crowfoot since 2015. He is the Associate Opposition Critic for Prairie Economic Development and Economic Advisor to the Conservative Leader.

Prior to his election, Mr. Kelly worked as a mortgage broker and co-owned a brokerage. He served as President of the Alberta Mortgage Brokers' Association and sat on the Real Estate Council of Alberta, a provincial regulatory body. He also taught pre-licensing education at Mount Royal University.

Mr. Kelly graduated from the University of Calgary with a bachelor's degree in political science.

Overview of Issues Raised

In the House, Mr. Kelly has spoken about Canada's economic position, regulatory barriers to natural resources development, and affordable housing for the Canadian military. In line with his party's position, he opposes additional government spending and regulatory barriers to natural resources projects. He has advocated for repealing the Impact Assessment Act and Canadian Energy Regulator Act, and Oil Tanker Moratorium Act.

Private Members' Bills and Motions

In the 44th Parliament, Mr. Kelly introduced Bill C-266, An Act to amend the Excise Act and the Excise Act, 2001 (adjusted duties - beer, malt liquor, spirits and wine), which was dropped from the Order Paper with the 2025 election. The bill aimed to repeal or amend sections that provide for annual adjustments to the duties imposed on beer, malt liquor, spirits and wine.

Éric Lefebvre

Éric Lefebvre
Conservative, Richmond—Arthabaska (Quebec)

Biography

Éric Lefebvre was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Richmond—Arthabaska in 2025. Mr. Lefebvre is the Associate Opposition Critic for Finance.

Mr. Lefebvre was previously a member of the National Assembly of Quebec representing the electoral district of Arthabaska from 2016 to 2025. He was a member of the Coalition avenir Québec (CAQ) until he sat as an independent in 2024. From 2018 to 2024, he was Chief Government Whip.

From 2001 to 2008, Mr. Lefebvre was a city councillor in Victoriaville, Quebec. He left the position to run in the 2008 federal election. During this time, he worked as a senior assistant to former Conservative minister Denis Lebel.

He holds a bachelor's degree in physical education from the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières.

Overview of Issues Raised

In the House, Mr. Lefebvre has sought information on Canada's fiscal position and deficit projections.

Bloc Québécois

Jean-Denis Garon

Jean-Denis Garon, Vice-Chair
Bloc Québécois, Mirabel (Quebec)

Biography

Jean-Denis Garon has been the Member of Parliament for Mirabel since 2021. He is the Bloc Québécois Critic for Finance, National Revenue, and Aeronautics.

In Parliament, Mr. Garon previously served as Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology (INDU) and Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations. He also served as the Bloc Critic for Industry and Entrepreneurship.

Before entering politics, Mr. Garon was an economics professor at Université du Québec à Montréal's (UQAM) School of Management, teaching at the undergraduate, master's and doctoral levels. Moreover, he was an economic columnist and commentator for the Journal de Montréal, TVA, QUB radio, CKOI among other media. He also served as Vice-President of Knowledge Transfer at CIRANO (Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations)—a Quebec-based research centre.

Mr. Garon holds a PhD in economics from Queens University, and bachelor's and master's degrees in economics from UQAM.

Overview of Issues Raised

In the House, Mr. Garon has spoken on a range of issues, including tax fraud, privacy and data protection, support for small businesses, and climate change mitigation. He has expressed concern about the impact of open banking on credit unions and provincially regulated financial institutions, arguing that participation should be optional for them. According to his website, his priorities include increasing the Canada Health Transfer, automatic enrolment for the Guaranteed Income Supplement, creating a tax credit for working seniors, ending fossil fuel subsidies, and developing a national aerospace strategy. In line with his party's stance, he advocates for Quebec's interests and increased autonomy over its own affairs.

Private Members' Bills and Motions

During the 44th Parliament, Mr. Garon introduced Bill C-290, An Act to amend the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act and to make a consequential amendment to the Conflict of Interest Act, which dropped from the Order Paper with the 2025 election. The bill aimed to expand the application of the Act to additional categories of public servants and extend the period for filing a reprisal complaint.

Liberal Party

Hon. Karina Gould

Hon. Karina Gould, Chair
Liberal, Burlington (Ontario)

Biography

Karina Gould has been the Member of Parliament for Burlington since 2015.

In Parliament, she has held several roles including Leader of the Government in the House, as well as the Minister of Families, Children and Social Development, Minister of International Development, and Minister of Democratic Institutions.

Before entering politics, Ms. Gould worked as a trade and investment specialized for the Mexican Trade Commission in Toronto, a consultant for the Migration and Development Program at the Organization of American States in Washington, D.C. She also spent a year volunteering at an orphanage in Mexico.

In addition, she has volunteered in her community for several organizations including the Iroquoia Bruce Trail Club, the Burlington chapter of the Canadian Federation of University Women, the Mississauga Furniture Bank, Halton Women's Place, among others.

Ms. Gould attended McGill University and University of Oxford.

Overview of Issues Raised

As chair, Ms. Gould's role is focused on maintaining order and outlining procedures. She typically would not intervene to express her views on a given matter or ask questions to witnesses.

Carlos Leitão

Carlos Leitão
Liberal, Marc-Aurèle-Fortin (Quebec)

Biography

Carlos Leitão was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Marc-Aurèle-Fortin in 2025.

Mr. Leitão was previously a member of the National Assembly of Quebec representing the electoral district of Robert-Baldwin from 2014 to 2022. He was a member of the Quebec Liberal Party and served as Quebec's Minister of Finance from 2014 to 2018.

Mr. Leitão worked in the financial sector for over 30 years. He held different roles at the Royal Bank of Canada before becoming Chief Economist of Laurentian Bank Securities in 2003.

Mr. Leitão immigrated with his family to Canada from Portugal in 1975. He holds a bachelor's degree in economics from McGill University.

Overview of Issues Raised

In the House, Mr. Leitão has spoken about the need for trade diversification and business supports due to US tariffs.

Kent MacDonald

Kent MacDonald
Liberal, Cardigan (Prince Edward Island)

Biography

Kent MacDonald was first elected as the Member of Parliament for Cardigan in 2025.

Before entering politics, Mr. MacDonald operated Pondsedge Farms, his family's dairy and beef operation. He is a past director, vice-chair and chair of Dairy Farmers of PEI., as well as director and vice-chair of the PEI Federation of Agriculture. 

Overview of Issues Raised

In the press, Mr. MacDonald has expressed support for removing interprovincial trade barriers, increasing defence spending, and defending supply management. He also expressed interest in the condition of local wharves following damage from Hurricane Fiona.

Jake Sawatzky

Jake Sawatzky
Liberal, New Westminster—Burnaby—Maillardville (British Columbia)

Biography

Jake Sawatzky was first elected as the Member of Parliament for New Westminster—Burnaby—Maillardville in 2025.

Mr. Sawatzky received a bachelor's degree in neuroscience from the University of British Columbia (UBC) in 2024. During his time at UBC, he was a member of Beta Theta Pi fraternity and served as co-president of their annual hockey event, Drop the Puck for Mental Health, to raise funds for the Canadian Mental Health Association.

Overview of Issues Raised

In the press, Mr. Sawatzky has spoken about mental health and addiction, affordable housing, and public safety.

Ryan Turnbull

Ryan Turnbull
Liberal, Whitby (Ontario)
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions)

Biography

Ryan Turnbull has been the Member of Parliament for Whitby since 2019. He is the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance and National Revenue and to the Secretary of State (Canada Revenue Agency and Financial Institutions).

In Parliament, Mr. Turnbull previously served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry as well as to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance.

Before entering politics, Mr. Turnbull taught at various post-secondary institutions in Canada and abroad. He taught business ethics at corporate social responsibility at Ted Rogers School of Business Management. Mr. Turnbull founded a management consulting company, Eco-Ethonomics Inc., focused on social innovation and ethics. The company completed over 350 contracts on projects such as gender-based violence prevention, youth mental health and resiliency building, and environmental monitoring.

Mr. Turnbull holds bachelor's and master's degrees in philosophy from Carleton University. 

Overview of Issues Raised

As parliamentary secretary, Mr. Turnbull's role in committee focuses on supporting the work of the minister and initiating committee studies on the department-led legislation. That said, he has regularly asked questions to witnesses on a range of issues, including climate change mitigation, sustainable finance, and support for small businesses.

Page details

2026-02-03