Part I: environmental quality; objectives, guidelines and codes of practice (CEPA sections 7-10)

Part I authorizes the Minister to undertake scientific research relating to environmental pollution and to set objectives, guidelines and codes of practice relating to the quality of the environment.

Scientific research and development: the foundation of CEPA implementation

Through scientific research and development, we can evaluate the impact of toxics on the environment and human health, determine levels of exposure to contaminants that are of acceptable risk, monitor changes to the environment over time and develop solutions to problems. Scientists also look for ways to minimize risk associated with exposure to contaminants as they search for explanations and alternatives. Without this knowledge, we would not know when to set limits on the use of a substance, what limits to set, how to prevent or clean up problems or how to replace the substance with another that has less, and preferably no, damaging qualities.

A wide range of scientific work supports the implementation of CEPA. It falls into four broad categories:

Monitoring

Monitoring changes in the environment, an important component of the scientific work supporting the implementation of CEPA, is essential for assessing the impact of toxics and the effectiveness of measures meant to minimize environmental damage and potential threats to human life. While resources for large-scale, national monitoring programs have declined during the last 10 years, federal, provincial, and territorial governments have increased their cooperative/collaborative efforts in monitoring activities. During 1998-99, ongoing environmental monitoring continued through the following main efforts:

In addition, several longer-term monitoring and assessment programs were completed during this fiscal year:

State of the environment reporting

A new approach to reporting to Canadians on the state of the environment has been established under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed in 1998-99 by the five federal natural resources (5NR) departments. The approach has four principal components:

Guidelines for State of the Environment reports have been developed, and several reports are scheduled for publication in 1999-2000. Under this approach, the federal government continues to report regularly on a national set of environmental indicators, through the publication of indicator bulletins on key environmental issues. Four bulletins in the National Environmental Indicator Series - "Urban Water: Municipal Water Use and Wastewater Treatment", "Climate Change", "Sustaining Marine Resources: Pacific Herring Fish Stocks" and "Canadian Passenger Transportation" - were updated and published in 1998-99.
http://www.ec.gc.ca/soer-ree/

Environment Canada's Pacific and Yukon Region launched its Pacific and Yukon Environmental Indicators site, which features indicators for marine ecosystems, biodiversity, toxic contaminants, stratospheric ozone depletion and freshwater quality.
http://www.ecoinfo.org

A Canada-United States progress report, Selection of Indicators for Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Health, presents a set of indicators that will assist reporting, every two years, on the state of the Great Lakes basin ecosystem.
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/solec/98/indicators/index.html

Research and development

It is impossible to describe all the CEPA-related research and development work that was completed or begun in the time period covered by this annual report. The following section categorizes the type of research and development work undertaken and provides examples of some important projects and their results.

In general, scientific research and development related to CEPA can be grouped into four categories:

Classification of substances

One of the main activities under CEPA is the identification and categorization of some substances as toxic. Solid scientific research is essential to the ongoing process of identifying and classifying toxic substances. This work leads to the development of guidelines, objectives and codes of practice for the safe use and disposal of substances and, when necessary, to the creation of policies or regulations to control their use and disposal. Following are some examples of 1998-99 research relating to the classification of substances:

Detection of substances

One of the areas of rapidly evolving research is the technology associated with monitoring and controlling the release of substances to the environment. Here are some examples of 1998-99 research relating to the detection of substances:

Development of cost-efficient tests for substances

Cost-effective and scientifically reliable tests are essential for the ongoing monitoring of substances in the environment and for checks on particular substances. Here are some examples of tests developed by Environment Canada and Health Canada scientists that relate to the implementation of CEPA:

Reduction in the use, release or presence of toxic substances

Research and development can identify ways to reduce or avoid the use, release or presence of substances that may have a harmful effect on the environment.

Testing

Sample tests are used to establish the presence of toxic substances and verify compliance with CEPA regulations. In 1998-99, the Environmental Technology Centre:

Advice

An important contribution to pollution prevention is the sharing of expertise - internally, among regional and national offices of Environment Canada, and externally, with other federal, provincial and territorial government departments, the public, international agencies and foreign governments.

Objectives, guidelines and codes of practice

Environmental quality guidelines and objectives

Environmental quality guidelines and objectives are established under CEPA Part I for air, soil, sediment and freshwater and marine water quality. Water, soil and sediment quality guidelines are endorsed by the CCME prior to their publication and are widely used across Canadian jurisdictions for managing toxic substance risks in the environment. Although guidelines are not laws, they may form the basis for laws and regulations. In the case of persistent and bioaccumulative toxic substances, they may act as "action levels" - interim management objectives that assist with tracking progress towards the virtual elimination of the substances.

During 1998-99, over 40 national guidelines for water, soil and sediment quality were finalized and approved by CCME. More than 10 more were under development. These guidelines specify a limit or concentration of a substance in the environment that is recommended in order to protect and sustain the environment and its uses.
http://www.ec.gc.ca/ceqg-rcqe

Water quality guidelines

Finalized: benzene, colour, didecyldimethyl-ammonium chloride (DDAC), dissolved gas supersaturation, dissolved oxygen, HCBD, 3-iodo-2-propynyl butyl carbonate (IPBC), reactive chlorine species, styrene and total particulate matter
Under way: aluminum, ammonia, copper, inorganic fluoride, selenium and silver

Sediment quality guidelines

Finalized: seven metals, 13 individual PAHs and five organochlorine pesticides (marine and freshwater sediments)

Soil quality guidelines

Finalized: cadmium, chromium, copper, ethylene glycol, lead, mercury and zinc (for protection of agricultural, residential, commercial and industrial land uses)
Under way: selenium and uranium
Assessment in progress: petroleum hydrocarbons

Tissue quality guidelines

Finalized: dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), PCBs and toxaphene
Under way: dioxins and furans

Marine monitoring guidelines

Under the Disposal at Sea Program, monitoring guidelines have been developed, field tested and phased in to routine disposal site monitoring. In September 1998, a national guidance document was finalized to update the interim monitoring guidelines from 1993. Details on monitoring conducted at representative sites are available in the Compendia of Monitoring Activities at Ocean Disposal Sites, 1994-1997.

Page details

2013-04-19