Fleet Average NOx Emission Performance of 2009 Model Year
In relation to the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999
Transportation Division
Environment Canada
January 2012
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Purpose
- 3. Introduction
- 4. Company Fleet Average NOx Emission Performance for the 2009 Model Year
- 4.1 Scope of Company Reports
- 4.2 Distribution of Light-Duty Vehicles, Light Light-Duty Trucks, Heavy Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Passenger Vehicles
- 4.3 Company Fleet Average NOx Values
- 4.4 NOx Emission Credits/Deficits for the 2009 Model Year and End of Model Year Balance
- 4.5 Distribution of Bins and NOx Fleet Average Value for the Canadian Fleet
- 4.6 Fleet Average NOx Values Trend
- 5. Conclusions
- Table 1: Light-Duty Vehicle, Light Light-Duty Truck, Heavy Light-Duty Truck and Medium-Duty Passenger Vehicle Full Useful Life Exhaust Emission Standards
- Table 2: Fleet Average NOx Standards
- Table 3: Scope of Company Reports
- Table 4: Summary of Company Average NOx Values for the Combined Fleet of Light-Duty Vehicles, Light Light-Duty Trucks, Heavy Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Passenger Vehicles
- Table 5: NOx Emission Credits/Deficits for the 2009 Model Year and End of Model Year Balance
- Table 6: Distribution of Vehicles by the NOx Standard of Each Bin
Under the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations (hereafter referred to as the “Regulations”), each new light-duty vehicle, light-duty truck and medium-duty passenger vehicle is required to be certified by its manufacturer to one of the bins corresponding to those of the United States Environmental Protection Agency for which there are specific emission standards for oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and other pollutants. In addition, manufacturers and importers of these vehicles are required to report on their fleet average NOx emission performance for each model year.
This report is the sixth annual performance report and it summarizes the fleet average NOx emission performance of the Canadian 2009 model-year fleet of vehicles. It includes the fleet average NOx value for each company as well as their emission credits/deficits. It also provides a comparison of the distribution of vehicles certified to the various emissions bins and the overall NOx performance with that of previous model years (i.e., 2004 to 2008 model years).
For the 2009 model year, 23 companies submitted end of model year reports comprising a total of 1 351 327 vehicles manufactured in Canada or imported into Canada for the purpose of first retail sale. Each individual company had a fleet average NOx value that was at or below the standard of 0.07 grams/mile, and all companies complied with the fleet averaging provisions of the Regulations based on their reports.
The average NOx value for the Canadian 2009 model year combined fleets of light-duty vehicles and light light-duty trucks and of heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles is 0.06743109 grams/mile compared to a single combined fleet average NOx standard of 0.07 grams/mile, and is continuing to decline. This trend is consistent with the objectives of the Regulations.
The purpose of this report is to summarize the fleet average NOx emission performance of individual companies and the overall Canadian fleet for the 2009 model year (MY) based on data submitted by companies in their end of model year reports; furthermore, it is also to report on the effectiveness of the Canadian fleet average NOx emission program in achieving the environmental performance objectives.
On January 1, 2004, the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations (hereafter referred to as the “Regulations”) came into effect under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999). These Regulations introduced more stringent national emission standards for on-road vehicles and engines. The Regulations align Canada’s emission standards for light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks, medium-duty passenger vehicles, heavy-duty vehicles, heavy-duty engines and on-road motorcycles with those of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through incorporation by reference to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
The Regulations also establish fleet average NOx standards for light-duty vehicles(i) (LDV), light light-duty trucks(ii) (LLDT), heavy light-duty trucks(iii) (HLDT) and medium-duty passenger vehicles(iv) (MDPV). Each new LDV, LLDT, HLDT and MDPV is required to be certified to one of the bins presented in Table 1, for which there are specific emission standards for NOx and other pollutants. A company’s choice of bin to which individual vehicle models are certified in a given model year is limited by the obligation to comply with the fleet average NOx standards associated with that model year. Table 2 presents the applicable fleet average NOx standards for a company’s fleet of LDV, LLDT, HLDT and MDPV.
Bin Number |
NOx | NMOG | CO | Formaldehyde | PM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11
|
0.9
|
0.28
|
7.3
|
0.032
|
0.12
|
10
|
0.6
|
0.156/0.230
|
4.2/6.4
|
0.018/0.027
|
0.08
|
9
|
0.3
|
0.090/0.180
|
4.2
|
0.018
|
0.06
|
8
|
0.20
|
0.125/0.156
|
4.2
|
0.018
|
0.02
|
7
|
0.15
|
0.09
|
4.2
|
0.018
|
0.02
|
6
|
0.10
|
0.09
|
4.2
|
0.018
|
0.01
|
5
|
0.07
|
0.09
|
4.2
|
0.018
|
0.01
|
4
|
0.04
|
0.07
|
2.1
|
0.011
|
0.01
|
3
|
0.03
|
0.055
|
2.1
|
0.011
|
0.01
|
2
|
0.02
|
0.01
|
2.1
|
0.004
|
0.01
|
1
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.0
|
0.000
|
0.00
|
Notes:
1) The equivalent limits in units of grams/km are obtained by multiplying the grams/mile value by 0.621.
2) Bins 8 through 10 contain additional temporary, less stringent standards for certain pollutants and for certain vehicles.
3) Bin 11 was only available for MDPV for the 2004 to 2008 model years.
4) Bins 9 and 10 were only available for LDV and LLDT for the 2004 to 2006 model years and for HLDT and MDPV for the 2004 to 2008 model years.
5) Beginning in the 2009 model year, applicable standards are limited to bins 1 to 8 for all categories.
Model Year
|
LDV/LLDT | HLDT/MDPV |
---|---|---|
2004 |
0.25
|
0.53
|
2005 |
0.19
|
0.43
|
2006 |
0.13
|
0.33
|
2007 |
0.07
|
0.20
|
2008 |
0.07
|
0.14
|
2009 and subsequent model years |
0.07
|
A company’s fleet average NOx value is the weighted average based on the number of vehicles certified to each bin. The emission bins, fleet average NOx standards, and methods of calculating fleet average NOx values are aligned with those of the EPA; however, there are differences in the structure of the NOx averaging program in Canada, which is designed to recognize vehicles that are sold concurrently in Canada and the U.S. The regulatory requirements are structured to deliver fleet average emissions comparable to those of the U.S. while minimizing the regulatory burden on companies and enabling the marketing of vehicles in Canada independently from the U.S.
The Regulations require that all companies submit a report to the Minister of the Environment no later than May 1 after the end of each model year. The end of model year report must contain detailed information concerning the company’s fleet(s) and/or groups of vehicles, including information related to the following:
- statements of allowable elections made by the company in complying with the fleet average NOx requirements of the Regulations, if any;
- the applicable fleet average NOx standard;
- the fleet average NOx value achieved by the company;
- the values used in calculating the company fleet average NOx value;
- calculation of NOx emission credits and/or deficits, if any;
- balance of credits or deficits; and
- credit transfers to or from the company, if any.
For more information regarding the calculation of fleet average NOx values and NOx emission credits or deficits please refer to the Regulations which can be found on the Environment Canada CEPA Registry. Reports for the 2004 to the 2008 model years can also be found on the CEPA Registry.
Table 3 presents a list of the companies that submitted an end of model year report for the 2009 model year in accordance with the requirements of the Regulations, including the vehicle makes as well as the number of test groups covered by their reports.
Company
|
Makes | Number of Test Groups1 |
---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Limited | Aston Martin |
2
|
BMW Group Canada | BMW, Mini, Rolls-Royce |
20
|
Chrysler Canada Inc. | Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep |
27
|
Ferrari North America, Inc. | Ferrari |
3
|
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Limited | Ford, Lincoln, Mercury |
25
|
General Motors of Canada Limited | Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Hummer, GMC, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn |
51
|
Honda Canada Inc. | Acura, Honda |
17
|
Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. | Hyundai |
14
|
Jaguar (Jaguar Land Rover Canada ULC) | Jaguar |
2
|
Kia Canada Inc. | Kia |
14
|
Land Rover (Jaguar Land Rover Canada ULC) | Land Rover |
4
|
Lotus Cars Limited | Lotus |
1
|
Maserati North America, Inc. | Maserati |
1
|
Mazda Canada Inc. | Mazda |
13
|
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | Maybach, Mercedes, Smart |
16
|
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada, Inc. | Mitsubishi |
9
|
Nissan Canada Inc. | Infiniti, Nissan |
23
|
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | Porsche |
7
|
Subaru Canada, Inc. | Subaru |
4
|
Suzuki Canada Inc. | Suzuki |
6
|
Toyota Canada Inc. | Lexus, Toyota |
25
|
Volkswagen Group | Audi, Bentley, Lamborghini, Volkswagen |
26
|
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | Volvo |
6
|
1 A test group is the basic classification unit that comprises LDV, LLDT, HLDT or MDPV having similar exhaust emission performances and that share all of the features described in section 1827, subchapter C, part 86 of the CFR.
A total of 23 companies submitted reports for the 2009 model year covering a total of 310 distinct test groups. It should be noted that certain test groups were common between companies that shared vehicle platforms or powertrains.
Starting with the 2009 model year, companies are required to meet a single fleet average NOx standard of 0.07 grams/mile for a combined fleet of LDV, LLDT, HLDT and MDPV. Therefore, companies were not required to distinguish their LDV and LLDT fleet from their HLDT and MDPV fleet in their 2009 model year reports.
Table 4 summarizes the total number of vehicles and average NOx values for each company’s combined fleet of LDV, LLDT, HLDT and MDPV.
Company
|
Total Number of Vehicles | Average NOx Value (grams/mile) |
---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Limited |
135
|
0.0700
|
BMW Group Canada |
26 571
|
0.070000
|
Chrysler Canada Inc. |
147 722
|
0.0639232
|
Ferrari North America, Inc. |
75
|
0.070
|
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Limited |
159 736
|
0.0572435
|
General Motors of Canada Limited |
255 177
|
0.0699082
|
Honda Canada Inc. |
147 352
|
0.0695283
|
Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. |
109 813
|
0.0700000
|
Jaguar (Jaguar Land Rover Canada ULC) |
1 038
|
0.07000
|
Kia Canada Inc. |
35 691
|
0.070000
|
Land Rover (Jaguar Land Rover Canada ULC) |
1 400
|
0.07000
|
Lotus Cars Limited |
44
|
0.070
|
Maserati North America, Inc. |
143
|
0.0700
|
Mazda Canada Inc. |
47 160
|
0.068504
|
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. |
22 351
|
0.069524
|
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada, Inc. |
25 420
|
0.070000
|
Nissan Canada Inc. |
86 875
|
0.070000
|
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. |
1 616
|
0.07000
|
Subaru Canada, Inc. |
20 768
|
0.070000
|
Suzuki Canada Inc. |
10 648
|
0.068921
|
Toyota Canada Inc. |
195 950
|
0.0682114
|
Volkswagen Group |
50 282
|
0.070000
|
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. |
5 360
|
0.07000
|
Note: Fleet average NOx values are rounded to the same number of significant figures that are contained in the total number of vehicles in a company’s fleet.
The company average NOx values ranged from 0.0572435 grams/mile to 0.0700000 grams/mile for the fleet of LDV, LLDT, HLDT and MDPV, and no companies reported a fleet average NOx value that was above the standard of 0.07 grams/mile. Fifteen out of twenty-three companies reported a fleet average NOx value that was equal to the fleet average NOx standard.
Table 5 summarizes the NOx emission credits/deficits obtained by each company for the 2009 model year. It also lists the balance of credits at the end of the 2009 model year for each company. Companies that elected to exclude their group of vehicles from compliance with the fleet average NOx standard, did not report credits or had a fleet average NOx value that was equal to the standard were assigned “0” for the “Total 2009 MY Credits”.
Company
|
Initial Balance1 |
Total 2009 MY Credits1 |
New Balance1 |
---|---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Limited |
0
|
04
|
0
|
BMW Group Canada |
913
|
04
|
913
|
Chrysler Canada Inc. |
41 020
|
898
|
41 918
|
Ferrari North America, Inc. |
0
|
02
|
0
|
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Limited |
37 732
|
2 038
|
39 770
|
General Motors of Canada Limited |
75 874
|
23
|
75 897
|
Honda Canada Inc. |
19 975
|
70
|
20 045
|
Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. |
3 163
|
04
|
3 163
|
Jaguar (Jaguar Land Rover Canada ULC) |
126
|
04
|
126
|
Kia Canada Inc. |
4 721
|
04
|
4 721
|
Land Rover (Jaguar Land Rover Canada ULC) |
953
|
04
|
953
|
Lotus Cars Limited |
0
|
02
|
0
|
Maserati North America, Inc. |
0
|
02
|
0
|
Mazda Canada Inc. |
14 878
|
71
|
14 949
|
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. |
0
|
11
|
11
|
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada, Inc. |
76
|
03
|
76
|
Nissan Canada Inc. |
18 854
|
03
|
18 854
|
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. |
456
|
04
|
456
|
Subaru Canada, Inc. |
2 606
|
04
|
2 606
|
Suzuki Canada Inc. |
1 255
|
11
|
1 266
|
Toyota Canada Inc. |
26 005
|
350
|
26 355
|
Volkswagen Group |
0
|
04
|
0
|
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. |
3 538
|
04
|
3 538
|
Total |
252 145
|
3 472
|
255 617
|
1 NOx emission credits/deficits are rounded to the nearest whole number. A negative sign (−) indicates a deficit.
2 The company elected to exclude their entire fleet, which is sold concurrently in Canada and the U.S., from compliance with the fleet average NOx standard pursuant to subsection 31(1) of the Regulations.
3 The company elected to exclude only parts of their fleet that satisfied the election from compliance with the fleet average NOx standard pursuant to subsection 31(1) of the Regulations. However, the average NOx value for their group of vehicles not subject to the election was equal to the fleet average NOx standard. Therefore, the company did not incur a deficit.
4 The company reported a fleet average NOx value that is equal to the fleet average NOx standard.
A total of 3 472 credits were generated by companies for the 2009 model year. No company incurred a deficit with respect to their 2009 model year fleet and no company reported a negative balance of credits at the end of the 2009 model year. Also, there were no transfers of credits to or from companies for the 2009 model year.
Table 6 summarizes the distribution of vehicles by the NOx standard of each bin. It also provides the calculated fleet average NOx value of the entire Canadian fleet for the 2009 model year.
Bin Number | NOx Standard (grams/mile) | Total Number of Vehicles in "Bin" | Percentage of Vehicles in "Bin" |
---|---|---|---|
11
|
0.9
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
10
|
0.6
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
9
|
0.3
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
8
|
0.20
|
4 040
|
0.30
|
7
|
0.15
|
0
|
0.00
|
6
|
0.10
|
0
|
0.00
|
5
|
0.07
|
1 246 221
|
92.22
|
4
|
0.04
|
89 404
|
6.62
|
3
|
0.03
|
10 272
|
0.76
|
2
|
0.02
|
1 390
|
0.10
|
1
|
0.00
|
0
|
0.00
|
Total Number of Vehicles in 2009 MY Fleet |
1 351 327
|
||
NOx Fleet Average Value for the Canadian Fleet (grams/mile) |
0.06743109
|
||
Fleet Average NOx Standard (grams/mile) |
0.07
|
For the 2009 model year, almost all vehicles (99.7% of the fleet) were certified to a bin at or below the fleet average NOx standard of 0.07 grams/mile. The NOx fleet average value for the Canadian fleet was 0.06743109 grams/mile, which is 3.7% below the standard.
Figure 1 depicts the changing distribution of the combined Canadian fleet by the NOx standard of each bin across the 2004 to 2009 model years. In addition, Figure 2 presents this information on a percentage basis to facilitate year to year comparison.
Figure 1: Distribution of the Canadian Fleet by Number of Vehicles in Each Bin
Figure 2: Distribution of the Canadian Fleet by the Percentage of Vehicles Relative to the Fleet in Each Bin
Figure 3 presents the average NOx values trend relative to the applicable standards since 2004 for both the LDV/LLDT and HLDT/MDPV fleets. The fleet average NOx value for the 2009 model year is shown as a single point as the fleet of LDV, LLDT, HLDT and MDPV is now subject to a single combined fleet average standard of 0.07 grams/mile instead of two different standards.
Figure 3: Fleet Average NOx Values and Standards
Overall, the fleet average NOx value for the combined fleets of LDV/LLDT and HLDT/MDPV decreased from 2004 to 2008. The fleet average NOx value for the 2009 model year continues to decrease and is 3.7% below the single combined fleet average NOx standard of 0.07 grams/mile.
This is the sixth year that companies were subject to the fleet average NOx requirements under the Regulations. A total of 23 companies submitted reports for a total of 310 distinct test groups comprising 1 351 327 vehicles that were either manufactured in Canada or imported into Canada for the purpose of first retail sale.
The fleet average NOx value for the 2009 model year was 0.06743109 grams/mile compared to a single combined fleet average NOx standard of 0.07 grams/mile. Each individual company had a fleet average NOx value that was at or below the standard, and all companies complied with the fleet averaging provisions of the Regulations based on their reports.
The fleet average NOx value for the combined fleets of LDV/LLDT and HLDT/MDPV continues to decrease which is consistent with the environmental performance objectives of the Regulations.
(i) Light-duty vehicles generally consist of passenger cars.
(ii) Light light-duty trucks generally consist of vans, sport utility vehicles and pick-up trucks having GVWR of 2 722 kg (6 000 pounds) or less.
(iii) Heavy light-duty trucks generally comprise vans, sport utility vehicles and pick-up trucks having a GVWR of more than 2 722 kg (6 000 pounds) and up to 3 856 kg (8 500 pounds).
(iv) Medium-duty passenger vehicles generally consist of heavier passenger-type vehicles, such as vans and sport utility vehicles having a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 3 856 kg (8 500 pounds) and less than 4 536 kg (10 000 pounds.
Page details
- Date modified: