Action Plan for the Northern Abalone in Canada [Final] 2012: Actions and Performance Measures

Previous ToC Next

The specific activities to recover Northern Abalone are summarized in Table 4. Some measures to recover the Northern Abalone population in Canada pre-date the 1990 fisheries closures and the species’ legal listing under the SARA. Many of the actions listed below were outlined in the 1999 Workshop for Rebuilding Northern Abalone in B.C. (Dovetail 1999), the 2002 National recovery strategy adopted under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (DFO 2002), the 2004 draft National Recovery Action Plan for Northern Abalone, and Recovery Strategy for Northern Abalone (2007), and have been ongoing and improving over several years. To date, these measures continue to be the most comprehensive and extensive means known to recover abalone. New actions or updated approaches have been added to Section 2.4.1 as appropriate. New activities may be added, or those existing activities adapted and revised as new information is gathered.

1. Management

Maintain the fisheries closures for Northern Abalone

Abalone fisheries closures were implemented in 1990 to allow for natural population recovery. However, there is evidence that the reduced abundance and resulting fragmentation of the population (i.e., animals spread too far apart) is hindering recovery. Model simulations from Lessard et al. (2007) predict that mortality rates >0.20 would result in further decline in the Northern Abalone population, and recommend that maximum human-induced mortality be near zero. Additional abalone harvest of any kind will significantly hinder recovery. To that end, the following management initiatives will be undertaken:

2. Protection

Implement a compliance promotion and enforcement (proactive and reactive) plan for the recovery of Northern Abalone.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Conservation and Protection (C&P) Branch promotes and enforces compliance with legislation that protects Northern Abalone. Efforts are both proactive and reactive. C&P activities for Northern Abalone are based on: Education and shared stewardship (e.g., public education, media releases, monitoring agreements, presentations to industry, schools and First Nations communities); Monitoring, control and surveillance activities (e.g., land, sea and air patrols, fish inspections, enforcement activities, interagency partnerships, and response to non-compliance); and Management of major cases and special investigations in relation to complex compliance issues (e.g., long-term, intelligence-based investigations that require a high level of specialized investigative skills).

Compliance promotion and enforcement are necessary to reduce mortalities of Northern Abalone from direct illegal harvest (poaching) and to encourage the public to contact C&P when witnessing suspicious activity. Protection of aggregations of abalone and habitats that support them will prevent losses of individuals and important habitat. Detection of abalone in transit disrupts illegal trade between buyers and sellers and allows officers to gather intelligence on individuals and groups involved in the illegal abalone trade. The following compliance and enforcement activities will be undertaken (subject to available resources):

2.1. Education and shared stewardship activities:

2.2 Activities to monitor, detect and respond to cases of non-compliance:

2.3. Develop major cases and intelligence-based investigations on illegal abalone trade.

2.4.Continue to review development proposals under the Fisheries Act following the impact assessment protocol (Appendix 4) to mitigate harmful alteration, disruption or destruction of abalone habitat and critical habitat.

Top of Page

3. Education and Awareness

Implement a communications campaign to stop illegal harvest and raise public awareness of Northern Abalone.
Communications campaigns are expected to increase support for, and awareness of, enforcement efforts, encourage public involvement and community stewardship of abalone. The communications approach will be used to support an ‘anti-poaching’ message:

3.1 Continue to raise awareness of the plight of the abalone and the threats to their survival, including, but not limited to:

3.2 Stop or discourage illegal harvesting activities, including but not limited to:

3.3 Significantly reduce demand for (illegal) Northern Abalone by targeting sales and consumption of Northern Abalone, including but not limited to:

4. Research and Population Rebuilding

Research that leads to improved understanding of threats, life history, recruitment and predator-prey interactions with Sea Otters will assist in developing long-term population and distribution objectives for Northern Abalone recovery. The potential contributions of First Nations traditional knowledge to improved understanding of Northern Abalone habitats is recognized and supported by an ecosystem approach. Evaluation of pilot projects is necessary to prioritize carrying out activities, as well as determine the appropriate rebuilding method(s) to address poor adult recruitment and to fill knowledge gaps on Northern Abalone biology, habitat and ecology. Criteria for evaluating feasibility of pilot projects should include the method’s ability to increase abalone abundance in study areas, efficiency, practical application and cost effectiveness. Studies and findings about abalone in other jurisdictions may also be incorporated into B.C. activities as applicable. Some research findings, including abalone traditional knowledge, may overlap and/or complement one another.

a) research on Northern Abalone to improve understanding of abalone recruitment and species interactions:

b) Continue to promote abalone population rebuilding initiatives in collaboration with First Nations and other coastal communities

First Nations and coastal communities have taken a lead in population rebuilding projects. Without this involvement, contribution and interest, many of the population rebuilding efforts and the associated research activities may not be possible (e.g., cost, time and effort prohibitive). Working co-operatively with coastal First Nations on proposals for projects that are in First Nations’ local areas, and with coastal communities and possibly other jurisdictions, will assist in the efforts for abalone population rebuilding.

While wild-to-wild translocations and aggregations of adults and outplanting of hatchery-raised abalone to the wild have shown some promise, their outcomes have often been poor and uncertain (Tegner 2000). In addition, their effects are likely very localized and may not be suited for species recovery on the whole. Evaluation is necessary (see Actions 4.5, 4.6 above) to determine appropriate use of these methods.

5. Population Monitoring

Monitor population status of Northern Abalone

Establishing a time series of abundance estimates is needed in the five biogeographic zones12 to determine the progress (decline or increase) of recovery in the Northern Abalone population compared to the population and distribution objectives. Ongoing monitoring of the abalone population is needed to assess its recovery and long-term viability, and the effectiveness of threat mitigation. Continuation of the current time series is needed to model and study recruitment variation, and population dynamics, in support of rebuilding efforts. The data collected in these surveys will be necessary to evaluate all of the objectives-based performance measures.

Top of Page

The performance measures outlined in Section 2.5 of the Recovery Strategy for Northern Abalone (2007) also apply to this action plan. Some questions from the recovery strategy have been re-framed (shown in italics) to focus and support future analyses of performance and progress towards achieving the stated objectives. A report on progress toward addressing each of the action-based performance measures from the recovery strategy is provided (Appendix 2).

Objective-based performance measures:

Action-based performance measures:

Management

Protection

Education and Awareness

Research and Population Rebuilding

Population Monitoring

Top of Page

The specific activities to recover Northern Abalone are summarized in Table 4. Activities are largely ongoing, and implementation dates15 are given. Where appropriate, partnerships with specific organizations and sectors have been identified. These partnerships and organizations will provide expertise and capacity to carry out the listed action. In consideration for reducing costs, activities will be combined where appropriate. Fisheries and Oceans Canada encourages groups and individuals other than those listed in Table 4 to participate in the recovery program for Northern Abalone in B.C. The list of organizations below will be adapted as needed.

Many actions in Table 4 were prioritized by the ART and AbRIG during the 2004 action planning process. Ratings and participation were re-confirmed at the 2009 AbRIG meeting. Priority ratings used in 2004 and 2009 were adapted from the criteria established by the national recovery program RENEW (Recovery of Nationally Endangered Wildlife; A Working Draft - Recovery Operations Manual 20 November 2001):


Key to Abbreviations used in Table 4:

BMSC
Bamfield Marine Sciences Centre Public Education Program
CC
B.C. coastal communities
CCG
Canadian Coast Guard, Fisheries & Oceans Canada
CFIA
Canadian Food Inspection Agency
DFO
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
DND
Canadian Department of National Defense
EC
Environment Canada - Habitat Stewardship Program for Species at Risk (HSP) and Aboriginal Funds for Species at Risk (AFSAR)
FN
First Nations
HASP
Heiltsuk Abalone Stewardship Project (Heiltsuk Fisheries Program)
HGAbS
Haida Gwaii Abalone Stewards, a partnership of the Haida Fisheries Program, Skidegate Band Council, Old Massett Village Council, Laskeek Bay Conservation Society, Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve and Haida Heritage Site, World Wildlife Fund Canada, Simon Fraser University (SFU) Centre for Wildlife Ecology, SFU School of Resource and Environmental Management, Environment Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
KASP
Kitasoo Abalone Stewardship Program (Kitasoo Fisheries Program)
MFP
Metlakatla Fisheries Program
NFD
Nisga'a Fisheries Department
NGOs
Non-governmental Organizations (e.g., Marine Stewardship Certification, Seafood Watch programs)
PCA
Parks Canada Agency
Proponent
Proponent for the works or developments on, in or under the water
PROV
Province of B.C. Ministry of Environment, B.C. Assets and Lands (provincial government), B.C. Conservation Officers Service
RCMP
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
TRAFFIC
Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network
Univ
Universities, e.g., Simon Fraser University, University of Victoria, and Thompson Rivers University

Top of Page


Table 4. Proposed Implementation Schedule. Activities listed are largely ongoing and many recovery measures were implemented prior to SARA’s proclamation and to the SARA Recovery Strategy (DFO 2007).

Recovery Activities

Obj.

Priority

Threats or concerns addressed

Responsibility

Start Date

Lead

Partners16

1. Management

1.1 Aboriginal, recreational and commercial abalone fisheries remain closed

All

U

Harvest
Low recruitment

DFO

CCG

Since 1990

1.2 Restrict release of detailed distribution and location to mitigate poaching and destruction of critical habitat

1, 2, 3

U

Harvest
Low recruitment
Habitat degradation/ loss

DFO

All

Since 1990

1.3 Continue to employ monitoring requirements in Lessard et al (2007) protocol for works and development in abalone habitat and critical habitat

All

U

Habitat degradation/ loss,

Critical Habitat destruction, Monitoring

DFO

Proponent

PCA

Since 2007

2. Protection

2.1 Promote compliance through education

All

U

Harvest
Low recruitment

DFO

CCG, FN, PCA

Since 1990

2.2 Monitor and respond to non-compliance

All

U

Harvest
Low recruitment

DFO

RCMP, DND, PCA

Since 1990

2.3 Build major cases and special investigations on illegal abalone trade

All

U

Harvest
Low recruitment

DFO

RCMP, CFIA, DND, EC, PCA, PROV, TRAFFIC

Since 1990, new efforts in 2010 are ongoing

2.4 Review works and development proposals in abalone habitat and critical habitat

1, 2, 3

U

Low recruitment
Habitat degradation/ loss

DFO

PROV
Proponent

Ongoing, as required

3. Education & Awareness

3.1 Raise awareness

All

N

Harvest
Low recruitment
SARA status

HGAbS, KASP,
G-N, HASP, MFP, NFP, BMSC, CC & FN, PCA, EC

DFO

Since 2000

3.2 Discourage illegal harvest

All

U

Harvest
Low recruitment

DFO

EC, HGAbS, KASP, NFP, MFP, G-N, HASP, BMSC, CC & FN, PCA

DFO since 1990, stewardship efforts since 2000

3.3 Reduce commercial demand of illegal product and target markets

All

N

Harvest
Low recruitment

DFO

Restaurants
ENGOs

Since 2003

4. Research & Rebuilding

4.1 Disease

All

N

Low recruitment

DFO

Since 2003

4.2 Larval dispersal

All

N

Low recruitment

PCA

DFO

Since 2002, again in 2009

4.3 Kinship identification

All

N

Low recruitment

Univ

DFO

PCA

BHCAP

Since 2002

4.4 Species interactions

3, 4

N

Sea Otters

Habitat effects

KASP, HASP, HGAbS,

Univ

PCA

DFO

Since 2002, new efforts in

2010 ongoing

4.5 Evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of pilot aggregation and translocation projects

All

U

Low recruitment

KASP

HGAbS, MFP, Gitga’at, DFO, EC, PCA

Since 2001

Data analysis in 2010/11

4.6 Evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of pilot out-planting

All

U

Low recruitment

Population rebuilding

Univ

BHCAP, Univ, DFO

Outplanting since 2003, surveyed some sites 2000, 2002, 2003

Report expected 2011/12

4.7 Traditional knowledge

All

N

TK, biology, ecology, threats, habitat

FN

AbRIG

DFO

2009

4.8 Enhancement to protect early life-stages

All

N

Low recruitment
Juvenile Survival

HGAbS, KASP

DFO, EC

Since 2001

4.9 Research on early benthic stages, identify habitat requirements

All

U

Low recruitment
Population rebuilding

Ab RIG, HGAbS, Univ

DFO, PCA

Since 2002, new efforts in 2010 ongoing

5. Monitoring

5.1 Index site surveys

1, 3, 4

U

All (Monitoring)

DFO

HGAbS

MFP

Since 1978,

North and Central Coasts

2011

Haida Gwaii

2012

5.2 Baseline abundance surveys in southern B.C.

3, 4

U

All (monitoring)

DFO

PCA

Since 2003,

  • WCVI

2013

  • QCS

2014

5.3 Survey methodology for juveniles

All

N

Low recruitment

HGAbS, KASP, Univ

DFO, PCA

Since 2002

Top of Page


10 This action is subject to review and permitting under SARA (S. 73).

11 This action is subject to review and permitting under SARA (S. 73).

12 Five biogeographic zones were identified for Northern Abalone in B.C. based on environmental, management and/or biological considerations. These areas include intertidal and subtidal waters surrounding the following land areas: Haida Gwaii; North and Central Coasts (Cape Caution north to and including Prince Rupert); Queen Charlotte and Johnstone Straits (Seymour Narrows near Quadra Island north to Cape Caution); Georgia Basin (San Juan Point to Seymour Narrows near Quadra Island); and West Coast of Vancouver Island (San Juan Point north to the Scott Islands).

13 In place of, “Was the coast-wide closure an effective measure contributing in halting the population decline?”

14 Replaces ‘Was baseline abundance established in each of the biogeographic zones?’ That action has been completed.

15 Implementation dates may refer to implementation of an improved program rather than a date at which similar activities were started.

16 Partnerships do not necessarily identify specific actions or subsidiary actions required to complete the recovery activity.

Top of Page

Previous ToC Next

Page details

2022-02-24