Southwestern Saskatchewan multi-species action plan 2017: part 3

Appendix A: Threat assessment table

Table 12. Threat assessment for all species covered in the SoD Action Planm
Threat category Threats Black-footed Ferret Black-tailed Prairie Dog Burrowing Owl Greater Sage-Grouse Prairie Loggerhead shrike Long-billed curlew McCown's Longspur Mormon Metalmark
1 Accidental mortality 1a Collisions with vehicles on roads or trails - - Low Low Low - - -
1 Accidental mortality 1b Accidental trapping/poisoning - - - - - - - -
1 Accidental mortality 1c Tillage, seeding, haying or mowing operations - - Low Low - Low Med -
1 Accidental mortality 1d Collisions with infrastructure (e.g. fences) - - - Low - - - -
1 Accidental mortality 1e Application of pesticides and other chemicals - - Low - Low Low Low Low
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2a Alterations to natural grazing and fire regimes - - - Low - Med Med -
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2b Alterations of water regimes (e.g. dams and irrigation) - - - Med - - - -
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2c Pest control on ground squirrels and prairie dogs Low - Low - - - - -
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2d Increased predation pressure Med Low Med High Med Med Med -
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2e Competitive exclusion - - - - - - - -
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2f Decreased prey availability - - Med - - - - -
3 Climate and Natural Disasters 3a Inclement or extreme weather conditions - Low Med High Med Low Low Low
3 Climate and Natural Disasters 3b Increased risk of drought Low Med - High - - - Low
4 Disturbance or Harm 4a Industrial activities (e.g. oil and gas noise) - - - High - Low - -
4 Disturbance or Harm 4b Pest Control (targeted poisoning/shooting) - Low - - - - - -
4 Disturbance or Harm 4c Recreational activities - - - - - Low - -
4 Disturbance or Harm 4d Traffic noise - - - High - - - -
4 Disturbance or Harm 4e Visual disturbance from increased number of vertical structures - - - Med - - - -
5 Exotic, Invasive  and Introduced Species 5a Invasion and establishment of exotic plants - - - - - Low - Low
5 Exotic, Invasive  and Introduced Species 5b Exotic and introduced diseases High High - High Low - - -
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6a Conversion of native habitat to crop and forage production - - Med Med Low Med High -
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6b Conversion of native habitat to industrial infrastructure - Low Low Med - Med Med Low
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6c Conversion of native habitat to roads - Low Low Med - - - -
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6d High-intensity prolonged grazing - - - Med - Low - Low
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6e  Destruction or degradation of wetland habitat - - - - - - - -
7 Natural Processes or Activities 7a Reduced genetic diversity Low - - Low - - - -
7 Natural Processes or Activities 7b Disease  Med Low - - - - - -
7 Natural Processes or Activities 7c Small population size  Med - - High - - - -
- Total Number of Threats 7 8 10 18 6 11 7 6
Table 12. Threat assessment for all species covered in the SoD Action Plan. (Continued)m
Threat category Threats Mountain Plover Northern Leopard Frog Sprague's Pipit Swift Fox Eastern Yellow-bellied Racer Number of Species Number of Species (high & med)
1 Accidental mortality 1a Collisions with vehicles on roads or trails Low Low - Low Low 7 0
1 Accidental mortality 1b Accidental trapping/poisoning - - - Low - 1 0
1 Accidental mortality 1c Tillage, seeding, haying or mowing operations - - Low - - 4 1
1 Accidental mortality 1d Collisions with infrastructure (e.g. fences) - - - - - 1 0
1 Accidental mortality 1e Application of pesticides and other chemicals Low Low Med - - 8 1
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2a Alterations to natural grazing and fire regimes High - High - - 5 4
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2b Alterations of water regimes (e.g. dams and irrigation) - Low - - - 2 1
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2c Pest control on ground squirrels and prairie dogs - - - - - 2 0
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2d Increased predation pressure - - Med Low - 9 7
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2e Competitive exclusion - - - Low - 1 0
2 Changes in Ecological Dynamics or Natural Processes 2f Decreased prey availability - - - - - 1 1
3 Climate and Natural Disasters 3a Inclement or extreme weather conditions Med - Low - Low 10 4
3 Climate and Natural Disasters 3b Increased risk of drought Med Low Low Med - 8 4
4 Disturbance or Harm 4a Industrial activities (e.g. oil and gas noise) - - Low - - 3 1
4 Disturbance or Harm 4b Pest Control (targeted poisoning/shooting) - - - - - 1 0
4 Disturbance or Harm 4c Recreational activities Low - - - Low 3 0
4 Disturbance or Harm 4d Traffic noise - - - - - 1 1
4 Disturbance or Harm 4e Visual disturbance from increased number of vertical structures - - - - - 1 1
5 Exotic, Invasive  and Introduced Species 5a Invasion and establishment of exotic plants Low - High - - 4 1
5 Exotic, Invasive  and Introduced Species 5b Exotic and introduced diseases - Med - - - 5 4
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6a Conversion of native habitat to crop and forage production Low Low High High Low 10 6
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6b Conversion of native habitat to industrial infrastructure Low - High Med - 9 5
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6c Conversion of native habitat to roads - Low Low Med Low 7 2
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6d High-intensity prolonged grazing - Low Med - - 5 2
6 Habitat Loss and Degradation 6e  Destruction or degradation of wetland habitat - Low - - - 1 0
7 Natural Processes or Activities 7a Reduced genetic diversity - - - - - 2 0
7 Natural Processes or Activities 7b Disease - - - Low - 2 1
7 Natural Processes or Activities 7c Small population size - - - - Low 2 2
- Total Number of Threats 9 9 12 9 6 - -

m Threat level (Low, Medium, High) as determined for the SoD region, NOT nationwide.

Appendix B: Effects on the Environment and Other Species

A strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is conducted on all SARA recovery planning documents, in accordance with the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals. The purpose of a SEA is to incorporate environmental considerations into the development of public policies, plans, and program proposals to support environmentally sound decision-making and to evaluate whether the outcomes of a recovery planning document could affect any component of the environment or any of the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy’s (FSDS) goals and targets.

Recovery planning is intended to benefit species at risk and biodiversity in general. However, it is recognized that implementation of action plans may also inadvertently lead to environmental effects beyond the intended benefits. The planning process based on national guidelines directly incorporates consideration of all environmental effects, with a particular focus on possible impacts upon non-target species or habitats. The results of the SEA are incorporated directly into the action plan itself, but are also summarized below in this statement.

Some recovery actions specified in Recovery Strategies or Management Plans may benefit, or alternatively be detrimental, to other species at risk found within the same area. For example, recovery efforts that are designed to conserve and restore native prairie habitats, which is the main focus of this Action Plan, will benefit the majority of the species covered within this Action Plan, as well as other federally listed species that are not currently covered, including Dwarf Wooly-heads (Psilocarphus brevissimus, prairie population), Chestnut-collared Longspur (Calcarius ornatus), Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor), Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis), Greater Short Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma hernandesi), Sage Thrasher (Oreoscoptes montanus), and Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus). Few species are expected to be detrimentally affected.

It is acknowledged that some specific land management initiatives such as prescribed burning, control and elimination of woody vegetation, or release of Black-footed Ferrets, may have negative consequences at the local scale for certain species at risk in that area. In those specific circumstances appropriate mitigation measures (e.g. timing, intensity, severity, exact location) will be taken into careful consideration on a case by case basis in order to minimize any negative impacts on species at risk or the environment. Follow-up monitoring is recommended after any management initiative in order to carefully document any negative impacts and ways to minimize them.

One must also keep in mind that our understanding of species and their interactions with each other is continually expanding; some of the positive and negative effects described in the original recovery documents  may actually have changed, or could change in the future, as we add to our knowledge base.  

This South of the Divide Multi-Species-at-Risk Action Plan directly contributes to the goals and targets of the Federal Sustainability Development Strategy for Canada. Specifically, it contributes to Goal 5: “Wildlife Conservation – Maintain or restore populations of wildlife to healthy levels”, and to Goal 6: “Ecosystem/Habitat Conservation and Protection- Maintain productive and resilient ecosystems with the capacity to recover and adapt”.

Appendix C: Maps of critical and important habitat

Note: Within the areas mapped as critical habitat, there may be areas of non-suitable habitat such as urban areas, annual cropland, roads, and water bodies. Such areas may have been included within mapped areas because of inadequate data, or because they are too small to map separately, and should not be considered critical habitat. Only those areas with the biophysical attributes described in Section 1.3 should be considered critical habitat.

These maps include both critical habitat identified in previous documents, and critical habitat that is newly identified in this Action Plan.

Figure 3. Critical Habitat for Burrowing Owl – western portion of the SoD area.

Figure 3 (and Figure 4) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green), comprising approximately 433 ha, are provided to show newly identified areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.2. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded circles do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 3 shows the 12 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Burrowing Owl can be found in the western portion of the study area. There are 10 in Reno RM, 8 of which are within Federal Pasture, one in Frontier RM, and another on the border between Frontier RM and White Valley RM within Provincial Pasture.

Figure 4. Critical Habitat for Burrowing Owl – eastern portion of the SoD area.

Figure 4 (and Figure 3) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green), comprising approximately 433 ha, are provided to show newly identified areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.2. Critical habitat previously identified for Burrowing Owl (shaded red), comprising approximately 58 ha, is shown within the SoD area (excluding Grasslands National Park) for the convenience of the reader. For details on previously identified critical habitat, refer to Environment Canada (2012a). The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green and red shaded circles do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 4 shows the 5 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Burrowing Owl can be found in the eastern portion of the study area, all within the Val Marie RM. Three of these are within Federal Pasture, and the other two are within Provincial Pasture.

Figure 5. Critical Habitat for Eastern Yellow-bellied Racer

Areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green), comprising approximately 76 ha, are provided to show newly identified areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.3. Critical habitat previously identified for Eastern Yellow-bellied Racer (shaded red), comprising approximately 152 ha, is shown within the South of the Divide area (excluding Grasslands National Park) for the convenience of the reader. For details on previously identified critical habitat, see Parks Canada Agency (2010). The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green and red shaded circles do not contain critical habitat except for additional critical habitat identified in the Multi-species Action Plan for Grasslands National Park (Parks Canada Agency 2016).

Long description

Figure 5 shows the 3 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Eastern Yellow-bellied Racer can be found. Two are within the Val Marie RM, in Federal Pasture. The other is in the Waverley RM in Grasslands National Park.

Figure 6. Critical Habitat for Prairie Loggerhead Shrike

Areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 9,616 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.4. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded polygons do not contain critical habitat except for additional critical habitat identified in the Multi-species Action Plan for Grasslands National Park (Parks Canada Agency 2016).

Long description

Figure 6 shows the 10 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Prairie Loggerhead Shrike can be found. Eight are in the Val Marie RM, 2 of which are in Federal Pasture and two others are partly in Grasslands National Park. The remaining two squares are in the Grassy Creek RM, of which one is in Federal Pasture.

Figure 7. Critical Habitat for Mormon Metalmark – central part of the SoD area

Figure 7 (and Figure 8) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green), comprising approximately 298 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.6. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded circles do not contain critical habitat except for additional critical habitat identified in the Multi-species Action Plan for Grasslands National Park (Parks Canada Agency 2016).

Long description

Figure 7 shows the 4 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Mormon Metalmark can be found in the center of the study area. All four are in the Val Marie RM, three of which are in Federal Pasture, while the other is partly in Grasslands national Park.

Figure 8. Critical Habitat for Mormon Metalmark – eastern part of the SoD area

Figure 8 (and Figure 7) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green), comprising approximately 298 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.6. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded circles do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 8 shows the UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Mormon Metalmark can be found in the eastern portion of the study area. It is located in the Waverley RM within Grasslands National Park.

Figure 9. Critical Habitat for Mountain Plover – western part of the SoD area

Figure 9 (and Figure 10) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green), comprising approximately 215 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.7. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded circle do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 9 shows the UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Mountain Plover can be found in the western portion of the study area. It is located in the Reno RM within Federal Pasture.

Figure 10. Critical Habitat for Mountain Plover – eastern part of the SoD area

Figure 10 ( and Figure 9) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green), comprising approximately 215 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.7. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded circles do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 10 shows the four UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Mountain Plover can be found in the eastern portion of the study area. All the squares are located within the Val Marie RM, two of which are in Provincial Pasture, and the other two are in Federal Pasture.

Figure 11. Critical Habitat for Sprague's Pipit - western part of the SoD area

Figure 11 (and Figure 12) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 418,169 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.5. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded polygons do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 11 shows the 90 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Sprague’s Pipit can be found in the western portion of the study area. Critical habitat covers approximately 40 percent of the western portion of the study area.

Figure 12. Critical Habitat for Sprague's Pipit – eastern part of the SoD area

Figure 12 (and Figure 11) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan.  Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 418,169 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.5. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded polygons do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 12 shows the 79 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Sprague’s Pipit can be found in the eastern portion of the study area. Critical habitat covers approximately 80 percent of the eastern portion of the study area.

Figure 13. Critical Habitat for Swift Fox - western part of the SoD area

Figure 13 (and Figure 14) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 368,756 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.8. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded polygons do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 13 shows the 53 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Swift Fox can be found in the western portion of the study area. Critical habitat covers approximately 40 percent of the western portion of the study area.

Figure 14. Critical Habitat for Swift Fox – eastern part of the SoD area

Figure 14 (and Figure 13) show areas within which critical habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 368,756 ha are provided to show areas that meet the criteria set out in Section 1.3.8. The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded polygons do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 14 shows the 51 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Swift Fox can be found in the western portion of the study area. Critical habitat covers approximately 30 percent of the eastern portion of the study area.

Figure 15. Important Habitat for Black-tailed Prairie Dog

Areas within which important habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green), comprising approximately 58 ha, are provided to show areas that contain important habitat, where the criteria set out in Section 1.5.2 are met and which were defined in 2007.

Long description

Figure 15 shows two areas where important habitat for Black-tailed Prairie Dog can be found. Both areas are within the Val Marie RM, one is in Federal Pasture and the other is in Provincial Pasture.

Figure 16. Important Habitat for Long-billed Curlew – western part of the SoD area

Figure 16 (and Figure 17) show areas within which important habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 483,941 ha are provided to show areas that contain important habitat, where the criteria set out in Section 1.5.3 are met.

Long description

Figure 16 shows the coverage of important habitat for the Long-billed Curlew as representing approximately 50 percent of the western portion of the study area.

Figure 17. Important habitat for Long-billed Curlew - eastern part of the SoD area

Figure 17 (and Figure 16) show areas within which important habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 483,941 ha are provided to show areas that contain important habitat, where the criteria set out in Section 1.5.3 are met.

Long description

Figure 17 shows the coverage of important habitat for the Long-billed Curlew as representing approximately 50 percent of the eastern portion of the study area.

Figure 18. Important Habitat for McCown's Longspur – western part of the SoD area

Figure 18 (and Figure 19) show areas within which important habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 394,651 ha are provided to show areas that contain important habitat, where the criteria set out in Section 1.5.4 are met.

Long description

Figure 18 shows the coverage of important habitat for the McCown’s Longspur as representing approximately 40 percent of the western portion of the study area.

Figure 19. Important Habitat for McCown's Longspur - eastern part of the SoD area

Figure 19 (and Figure 18) show areas within which important habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 394,651 ha are provided to show areas that contain important habitat, where the criteria set out in Section 1.5.4 are met.

Long description

Figure 19 shows the coverage of important habitat for the McCown’s Longspur as representing approximately 30 percent of the eastern portion of the study area.

Figure 20. Important Habitat for Northern Leopard Frog

Areas within which important habitat is found in the South of the Divide area, Saskatchewan. Detailed polygons (shaded green) comprising approximately 447,118 ha are provided to show areas that contain important habitat, where the criteria set out in Section 1.5.5 are met. Note that only Northern Leopard Frog observations outside of Grasslands National Park are shown.

Long description

Figure 20 shows the coverage of important habitat for the Northern Leopard Frog as representing approximately 30 percent of the study area. Within this area, there are also 11 observations of the species. Six of these are in the Frontier RM, two are in the Reno RM, one is in Cypress Hills provincial Park in the Maple Creek RM, one is in White Valley RM, and the other is within Federal Pasture of Val Marie RM.

Appendix D: Critical Habitat Previously Identified for Black footed Ferret and Greater Sage-Grouse

D.1 Black-footed Ferret

D.1.1 Identification of critical habitat for Black-footed Ferret

Critical habitat for Black-footed Ferret was described by Tuckwell and Everest (2009b) as follows:

The critical habitat … is defined by the boundaries of the prairie dog colonies in Canada as of 2007 …, but excludes all existing roads and their ditches within these boundaries. This includes prairie dog colonies within the current boundary of Grasslands National Park, the Masefield Community Pasture (Agri-Environment Services Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), the Dixon Community Pasture (Province of Saskatchewan), on provincially leased land and privately deeded land. The colonies that occur on lands managed by two landowners, which are on a combination of private and provincially leased lands, are within the boundary of the proposed Grasslands National Park. As part of the 1988 Parks Canada – Province of Saskatchewan Grasslands National Park establishment agreement, section 12.1 specifies that “Saskatchewan agrees to manage the proposed national park in a manner that recognizes the need to maintain the lands in their existing natural state for park purposes prior to the transfer of administration and control of such lands to Canada.” This implies that those lands and prairie dog colonies within the proposed park boundary are afforded some protection.

Critical habitat for Black-footed Ferret in the SoD area is found within approximately 58 ha distributed over 9 quarter-sections (Figure 21).

D.1.2 Examples of activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat for Black-footed Ferret

Activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat for Black-footed Ferret were described by Tuckwell and Everest (2009b) as follows:

Critical habitat for black-footed ferrets is destroyed when ferrets can no longer use any portion of a prairie dog colony for feeding, obtaining shelter and raising young. This happens when burrows collapse, fill in with soil or water or are excavated or otherwise blocked. Critical habitat is also destroyed if the vegetation community is changed dramatically and becomes too tall or obstructive, causing difficulty for ferrets in movement between burrow holes to obtain shelter, or increasing potential cover and perching opportunities for predators. The prairie dogs maintain this vegetation at levels suitable for the ferrets. Destruction of the critical habitat could happen due to physical alteration of the land or if the prairie dogs on a colony are destroyed and the colony is therefore no longer maintained. The fact that some pastures contribute to ferret habitat is evidence of the importance of large-scale grazing ecosystems. Proper grazing management and associated activities are compatible with critical habitat. Creation of new shallow pipelines may be compatible with critical habitat. Management practices that do not constitute destruction of critical habitat include the use and maintenance of:

Some examples of activities that may result in destruction of critical habitat, include, but are not limited to:

In contrast, pre-existing agricultural activities, like sustainable livestock grazing, are compatible with critical habitat for ferrets. Existing roads are not included in the description of critical habitat and therefore road maintenance activities are not likely to result in destruction of critical habitat.

Only some of these activities alone, such as cultivation and flooding, are likely to destroy critical habitat. However, there are probably thresholds or threshold zones of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, and changes to habitat conditions beyond which their cumulative effects would jeopardize the ability to achieve the recovery population and distribution objectives (Huggett 2005, Lindenmayer & Luck 2005, Jager et al. 2006, Bets et al. 2007, Rhodes et al. 2008). The cumulative effects of some combination of these activities could alter the habitat attributes and functions beyond a threshold necessary to achieve the population and distribution objectives for the species' recovery. Unfortunately these threshold values are unknown for ferret critical habitat at the time of writing of this [BFFE RS 2009] document.

Figure 21. Critical Habitat for Black-footed Ferret

Areas within which critical habitat was previously identified for Black-footed Ferret (shaded red), comprising approximately 58 ha distributed over 9 quarter-sections within the SoD area (excluding Grasslands National Park). This is shown for the convenience of the reader. For details on previously identified critical habitat, see Tuckwell and Everest (2009b). The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the red shaded polygons do not contain critical habitat.

Long description

Figure 21 shows the three UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Black Footed Ferret was previously identified. All three are in Val Marie RM, two within Provincial Pasture, and one in Federal Pasture.

D.2 Greater Sage-Grouse

D.2.1 Identification of critical habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse

Within the SoD area, Greater Sage-Grouse critical habitat is found within approximately 94,842 ha distributed over 3,351 quarter-sections.

Critical habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse was fully identified in the Amended Recovery Strategy (Environment Canada 2014a), but has been included here for the benefit of the reader. For full context, the reader is encouraged to view the entire Greater Sage-Grouse Amended Recovery Strategy document, which may be found on the SARA Registry From p.23 (Section 7 Critical Habitat  Environment Canada 2014a):

Sage-Grouse are at very high risk of extirpation from Canada, with the current total population considerably lower than the population and distribution objectives for this species. Suitable habitats in which Sage-Grouse are most likely to have recently (2000–2012) occurred during any life stage (e.g., lekking, nesting, brood-rearing, or wintering), as well as additional leks last active in the 1980’s or 1990’s that have intact, suitable habitat currently surrounding them, represent critical habitat for survival and recovery of the species in Canada.

Identification of the Species’ Critical Habitat

Critical habitat for the Sage-Grouse is fully identified in this Amended Recovery Strategy for nesting, brood-rearing, and wintering habitat (i.e., year-round habitats) that broadly surrounds all leks active in any year between 2000 and 2012 plus additional nearby leks last active in the 1980’s or 1990’s. The critical habitat attributes and locations are identified using the best available information, including documented field observations of Sage-Grouse from Alberta and Saskatchewan, the output from habitat modeling, and other scientific information on seasonal habitat requirements for the species. The following approaches were used to identify 1) lek critical habitat, and 2) year-round (nesting, brood-rearing, and winter) critical habitat for the Sage-Grouse, in Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Lek critical habitat

Lek critical habitat was previously identified in the ‘Replacement of Section 2.6 of the Recovery Strategy for the Greater Sage-Grouse in Canada’ (Parks Canada Agency 2009). All recently-active leks (where at least one displaying male Sage-Grouse was observed between 2000 and 2012) were identified as lek critical habitat, totaling 18 lek locations in Alberta and 11 lek locations in Saskatchewan. In this Amended Recovery Strategy, 12 additional leks last active in the 1980’s or 1990’s are also identified as critical habitat, 3 of which are in Alberta and 9 of which are in Saskatchewan (see Parks Canada Agency 2009 for details on how lek locations and extents were determined in the field within each province).

Thus, a combined total of 41 suitable lek sites (21 in Alberta and 20 in Saskatchewan) are identified as mating critical habitat for Sage-Grouse survival and recovery, with a total area of 12.5 km2. The total number of lek sites identified as critical habitat (41 potential leks) is greater than the number required to be active on a per-year basis (36 leks) under the long-term population and distribution objectives; this acknowledges the inherent uncertainty around predicting exactly which abandoned leks will become reoccupied in future years and also allows for some variation in which leks are active each year.

All habitat within the boundaries of these 41 identified leks, which have a history of use by displaying Sage-Grouse, is identified as critical habitat. Although the most important feature of these leks is the recurrent occupancy that occurred in the past, to aid in locating these areas on the ground, the general biophysical attributes of leks are listed below:

  • Typically lower elevation than surrounding areas
  • Treeless and flat, with sparse vegetation (e.g., dried mud flats or valley bottoms)
  • Adjacent to shrub-dominated habitats that are primarily silver sagebrush

The presence of certain human activities or structures on or near leks decreases the probability that Sage-Grouse will continue to occupy otherwise suitable leks, most likely because of behavioural avoidance of such areas by Sage-Grouse. As a result, the presence of Sage-Grouse is associated with lower amounts of these human factors, meaning that the following conditions (or ‘attributes’) are considered functionally important to lek critical habitat:

  • Limited noise disturbance
  • Limited human presence
  • Limited presence of artificial perches, or artificial nest structures for avian predators of Sage-GrouseFootnote 4
Year-round (nesting, brood-rearing, and winter) critical habitat

In this Amended Recovery Strategy, a predictive occurrence-based model was used to identify critical habitat in Canada for Sage-Grouse nesting, brood-rearing, and winter life stages (i.e., year-round critical habitat). One benefit of such predictive models is that they identify suitable habitat not only in areas where Sage-Grouse occurrence data are available, but also where occurrence data are currently unavailable.

The updated model used in this Amended Recovery Strategy followed previous approaches of identifying suitable Sage-Grouse habitat in Alberta (Aldridge 2005, Aldridge and Boyce 2007, Parks Canada Agency 2009; see also Carpenter et al. 2010) but incorporated modifications and improvements that allowed it to be applied across a much larger geographic extent (Aldridge & Gummer 2010; Gummer & Aldridge 2010; Parks Canada Agency and Environment and Climate Change Canada unpubl. data). The model analysis (Parks Canada Agency unpubl. data) related Sage-Grouse nest locations (113 nests; 2001–2004) to habitat variables, and determined that nesting Sage-Grouse hens select relatively large patches of moderate and heterogeneously-distributed shrub cover (predominantly silver sagebrush), favour relatively moist areas, and avoid lush green vegetation cover. Environment and Climate Change Canada employed the updated model, which Parks Canada Agency originally developed, within the estimated recent nesting distribution for Sage-Grouse in Alberta and Saskatchewan, then tested this modeled habitat area against a set of other known Sage-Grouse occurrences against a set of other known Sage-Grouse occurrences (114 nests; 1998–2009) that had not been used for model development. The modeled habitat performed well, as it captured 88% of the known nests in this independent dataset.  In addition, Environment and Climate Change Canada tested the habitat model against Sage-Grouse occurrences from other life stages (i.e., brood-rearing and winter), and showed that the modeled nesting habitat also contained a large proportion of the known brood-rearing (82% of 864 locations) and wintering (96%- of 296 locations) Sage-Grouse occurrences. This confirms that the modeled habitat provides a good representation of suitable ‘year-round’ habitat for Sage-Grouse.

Year-round (nesting, brood-rearing, and winter) critical habitat for Sage-Grouse was identified by the habitat suitability model through the calculation of optimal combinations of two or more of the following biophysical attributes:

  • Moderate shrub cover, typically silver sagebrush with a patchy distribution
  • Limited amounts of bare ground
  • Moderately moist habitats (under average weather conditions)
  • Limited amounts of lush green vegetative cover
  • Adequate availability of prey (insects) and forage (forbs)

These areas were mapped using a geographic information system. Within these mapped boundaries, some habitats that are known to be unsuitable (human settlements, annual cropland, non-native hayland, water bodies, roads or roadsides) were identified using independent satellite imagery and then removed from the suitable habitat map. The remaining areas of suitable habitat were mapped within the western portion and the eastern portion of the species 2000–2012 range to indicate the year-round critical habitat for Sage-Grouse in Canada. These identified areas encompass 2812 km2 of land (1410 km2 in Alberta + 1402 km2 in Saskatchewan), covering portions of 8360 quarter-sections (4026 in Alberta; 4334 in Saskatchewan). Within these mapped areas any remaining human settlements (including cities, towns, rural and agricultural residences, garages, shelters, barns etc.), annual cropland, non-native hayland, water bodies, roads or roadsides (i.e., land within 15m of roads), which were not identified using satellite imagery, and therefore had not been removed from the mapped areas  (see previous paragraph), are not to be considered critical habitat.

The presence of other human activities or structures can decrease the probability that Sage-Grouse will occupy otherwise suitable habitat, most likely because of behavioural avoidance of such areas by Sage-Grouse. As a result, the presence of Sage-Grouse in suitable habitat is related to low amounts of these human factors, so the following conditions (or ‘attributes’) are considered functionally important to nesting, brood-rearing, and winter critical habitat:

  • Limited human-modified areas
  • Limited chronic noise disturbances
  • Limited presence of artificial structures that serve as perches for large birds of prey

The critical habitat identified in this Amended Recovery Strategy is considered sufficient for meeting the long-term population and distribution objectives. Not only does the year-round critical habitat broadly surround the 41 leks identified as lek critical habitat, but it also encompasses much of the habitat in Canada within 10 kmFootnote 2 of 50 historical leks that were last active in one or more years between 1968 and 1999 (but inactive fromm 2000 to present). The habitat areas in the vicinity of these 50 additional historical leks have high potential to provide recovery habitat for Sage-Grouse because they are adjacent to, or interspersed among, currently or recently occupied habitat and hence can be considered most likely to be re-colonized in the future. If the 41 leks identified as lek critical habitat herein were the only ones to become active in the future, then the average of 63.3 adults per lek (i.e. 21.1 males per lek: see “Spring popn. Low estimate” in Appendices B & C) would achieve the population objective. On the other extreme, if all of the 50 additional historical leks within these same areas also become occupied in the future, 28.5 adults per lek (9.5 males per lek) would achieve the population objective..

D.2.2 Examples of activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse

From page 31 (Environment Canada 2014a):

This subsection of a recovery strategy describes the kinds of activities that are likely to cause the destruction of the critical habitat and provides examples of such activities. Information is provided on potential impacts to critical habitat and species populations that may result from these activities. This information is presented to help guide the recovery measures to be taken by Environment and Climate Change Canada and Parks Canada Agency, and other jurisdictions, organizations, and/or individuals involved in the conservation of Sage-Grouse and the protection of critical habitat for the species. 

Destruction of critical habitat is determined on a case-by-case basis. Destruction would result if part of the critical habitat were degraded, either permanently or temporarily, such that it would not serve its function when needed by the species. Destruction may result from single or multiple activities at one point in time or from the cumulative effects of one or more activities over time (Government of Canada 2009).

Existing facilities and land uses in and adjacent to Sage-Grouse critical habitat may already affect that critical habitat to some degree, causing habitat quality to vary  among specific sites within critical habitat. Since Sage-Grouse populations will require critical habitat to remain in at least as high a quality as it is currently, new types  of activities that degrade any of the biophysical attributes, could destroy critical habitat. Some of these same activities could occur adjacent or outside critical habitat (i.e. sensory disturbance, tall structures immediately adjacent to critical habitat).

An Emergency Order for the Protection of the Greater Sage-Grouse (Emergency Order) was made to address the imminent threats of the Sage-Grouse within the habitat that is necessary for their survival or recovery. The Emergency Order contains prohibitions that apply on provincial and federal crown lands within a number of legal subdivisionsFootnote 3 , and along road allowances that lie between those legal subdivisions, that are listed in Part 1 or 2 of Schedule 1 of the Emergency Order. These legal subdivisions and associated road allowances include and broadly surround all leks occupied by one or more male Sage-Grouse in at least one of the years between 2007 and 2012. The area included in the Emergency Order overlaps  with much of the critical habitat identified in this recovery strategy. There is also considerable overlap between the restrictions in the Emergency Order and the activities listed in the following four subsections of the Amended Recovery Strategy. Wherever the two documents address the same activities, the restrictions set out in the Emergency Order prevail over those set out in this recovery strategy. The critical habitat identified in this recovery strategy, most of which is also included in the Emergency Order, covers a total of 2812 km2 plus 12.5 km2 for leks.

In addition to the activities prohibited in the emergency order, example activities provided in the following non-exhaustive lists are likely to result in destruction of critical habitat:

1. Removal, reduction, or degradation of sagebrush and surrounding habitat

Sage-Grouse require year-round access to sagebrush for food and cover. Therefore, at any given time of year, the killing or moving of sagebrush results in direct habitat loss, reduced food availability and nesting cover, and increased exposure of Sage-Grouse to predation and inclement weather. In addition, activities that do not result in complete loss of sagebrush, but that significantly increase the proportion of bare ground, significantly  decrease the proportion of native grasses and/or native forbs, or remove most of the leaves off  sagebrush plants, may cause habitat degradation to the point where that habitat is no longer functional for Sage-Grouse.  The population impact from such forms of habitat destruction can range from low to very high, depending on the amount of habitat removed or the severity and extent of habitat degradation by the given activity..

Given the above, the following are examples of activities likely to result in destruction of year-round critical habitat or lek critical habitat, at any time of year:

  • Cultivating or converting sagebrush and surrounding habitatto an alternative vegetation type
  • Constructing a gas or oil well
  • Constructing a new road or widening an existing road
  • Killing sagebrush by moving, cutting or applying herbicide
  • Prolonged over-grazing to a point where the vegetation structure and plant community is no longer compatible with the habitat requirements of Sage-Grouse

In some situations, appropriate management of Sage-Grouse habitat requires infrastructure to support particular grazing activities. More specifically, waterwells or dug-outs may need to be maintained, narrow-diameter waterlines may need to be installed or re-located, or salt blocks may need to be placed or moved. Individual activities such as these, which are necessary to maintain or improve habitat conditions for Sage-Grouse over relatively large areas, should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, within the context of habitat management for the overall site, to determine whether or not they are considered to be destruction of critical habitat.

2. Altering natural hydrology

Activities that alter the natural hydrology of the habitat may negatively alter site conditions for silver sagebrush growth or regeneration, and for forb production, thereby reducing food availability and foraging ability for Sage-Grouse, as well as degrading vegetative cover that Sage-Grouse use for concealment from predators.

Therefore, the following are examples of activities likely to result in destruction of year-round critical habitat or lek critical habitat, at any time of year:

  • Constructing a dike, canal, ditch or dam within, or upstream or downstream from critical habitat, such that the natural hydrology within critical habitat is altered to the extent that silver sage and surrounding native grass and/or natural forb habitat is degraded (the distance at which a water control structure may impact critical habitat is dependent on the nature of the project).
  • Digging a depression in the ground to create a large dugout or man-made wetland inside any critical habitat such that silver sagebrush and forb habitat conditions in the vicinity are directly or indirectly degraded.
  • Creating a linear impediment to drainage (e.g., an earthen berm or elevated road bed) that alters overland runoff or flow within critical habitat such that silver sagebrush and forb habitat conditions are directly or indirectly degraded.
3. Acoustically degrading habitat

Constructing or installing a new structure or machine, that creates long-term continuous or intermittent (i.e., chronic) noise will likely result in avoidance of habitat by Sage-Grouse and, thus, in functional destruction of critical habitat.

Therefore, the following are examples of activities likely to result in destruction of critical habitat when conducted anywhere within year-round or lek critical habitat at any time of year:

  • Constructing a new road, or widening an existing road
  • Placing or installing a generator that produces continuous, regular, or intermittent sounds greater than 45 decibels (A-weighted)
  • Installing an oil pump-jack or natural gas compressor station that produces continuous, regular, or intermittent sounds greater than 45 decibels (A-weighted)
  • Erecting a wind turbine that produces continuous, regular, or intermittent sounds greater than 45 decibels (A-weighted)

During the mating period, repeated sound levels greater than 45 decibels (A-weighted) on or near lek critical habitat can lead to reduced attendance by Sage-Grouse at leks and to long-term lek abandonment, and thus to functional destruction of lek critical habitat. Therefore, when Sage-Grouse are typically at leks, which is during evening and morning display periods and the intervening ni-ght-time hours (i.e., from 1.5 hours prior to sunset until 1.5 hours after sunrise, between April 1st and May 30th, operating infrastructure or performing activities that produce noises greater than 45 decibels (A-weighted) inside or within 3.2 km of any lek critical habitat likely destroys lek critical habitat. When conducted during the mating season within these times and locations, the following are examples of activities likely to result in destruction of lek critical habitat:

  • Drilling for natural gas or oil
  • Conducting 2-D or 3-D seismic exploration
  • Operating an oil pump-jack or natural gas compressor station
  • Operating loud vehicles on a road
  • Operating loud off-road or all-terrain vehicles

Also, during the mating period, repeated pedestrian or non-motorized traffic on or near lek criticak habitat may lead to avoidance of the lek, reduced mating opportunities, and long-term lek abandonment, and thus to functional destruction of lek critical habitat. Therefore, when Sage-Grouse are typically at leks, which is during evening and morning display periods and the intervening night-time hours (i.e., from 1.5 hours prior to sunset until 1.5 hours after sunrise, between April 1st and May 30th), pedestrians or non-motorized traffic inside, or woithin 1 km of, any lek critical habitat likely destroys lek critical habitat. Examples of such activities likely to result in the destruction of lek critical habitat include:

  • Photography and other recreational or professional viewing
4. Constructing, erecting, or installing vertical structures

The introduction of new elevated anthropogenic structures results in both direct habitat loss,  and a more substantive functional loss of habitat because Sage-Grouse are more likely to avoid the area surrounding structures upon which birds of prey seem likely to perch. Furthermore, habitat suitability is reduced around such vertical structures because survival of Sage-Grouse is reduced.

  • Therefore, at any time of the year, inside of any critical habitat or at locations less than 1.0 km from lek critical habitat, the followiuing are examples of activities likely to result in the destruction of critical habitat:
  • Constructing or installing a gas or oil well with any component reaching a height that exceeds 1.2 m
  • Constructing a new building, or adding to an existing building, such that the final height is greater than 1.2 m
  • Constructing, installing or erecting a post, pole, tower, or wind turbine that has a final height greater than 1.2 m (e.g., utility pole, hawk nesting platform)

In addition, at any time of year, at locations further than 1 km from but closer than 3.2 km to lek critical habitat, the following are examples of activities likely to result in destruction of lek critical habitat:

  • Constructing, installing or erecting a wind turbine or tower (e.g., cell phone tower, radio tower, transmission tower) taller than 10 m

Lastly, fences installed inside  or near leks have the potential to improve the efficiency of avian or mammalian predators where grouse are out in the open and most conspicuous (i.e. at leks), and thus represent an increased risk of predation for Sage-Grouse. This increased risk of mortality near fences equates to a decrease in habitat quality.

Therefore, at any time of the year, at locations inside of lek critical habitat or  within 1.0 km of lek critical habitat, the following are examples of activities likely to result in destruction of lek critical habitat:

  • Constructing or installing a fence without post-top perch-deterrents or without fence-wire markers (i.e. a fence that is not designed to minimize Sage-Grouse mortality) in a location where no fence existed.

Figure 22. Critical Habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse: western part of the SoD area

Figure 22 (and Figure 23) show areas within which critical habitat was previously identified for Greater Sage-Grouse (shaded green), comprising approximately 94,842 ha distributed over 3,351 quarter sections within the SoD area (excluding Grasslands National Park). This is shown for the convenience of the reader. For details on previously identified critical habitat, including that contained within the boundaries of GNP, see Environment Canada (2014a). The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded polygons do not contain critical habitat, unless contained within GNP as noted above.

Long description

Figure 22 shows the 29 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse can be found in the western portion of the study area. The patches of critical habitat are within the Reno and Frontier Rural Municipalities.

Figure 23. Critical Habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse: eastern part of the SoD area

Figure 23 (and Figure 22) show areas within which critical habitat was previously identified for Greater Sage-Grouse (shaded green), comprising approximately 94,842 ha distributed over 3,351 quarter sections within the SoD area (excluding Grasslands National Park). This is shown for the convenience of the reader. For details on previously identified critical habitat, including that contained within the boundaries of GNP, see Environment Canada (2014a). The 10 x 10 km UTM grid squares (red outline) shown on this figure are part of a standardized national grid system that indicates the general geographic area within which critical habitat is found. Areas outside of the green shaded polygons do not contain critical habitat , unless contained within GNP as noted above.

Long description

Figure 23 shows the 42 UTM grid squares where critical habitat for Greater Sage-Grouse can be found in the eastern portion of the study area. Critical habitat covers approximately 20 percent of the eastern portion of the study area.

Appendix E: Glossary of terms

action plan
a recovery planning document that sets out the recovery measures that are to be taken to implement the recovery strategy, including those that address the threats to the species and those that help to achieve the population and distribution objectives, as well as an indication as to when these measures are to take place. If critical habitat was not fully identified in the recovery strategy, the action plan must include and identification of critical habitat, to the extent possible, based on the best available information and consistent wit the information presented in the recovery strategy, and examples of activities that are likely to result in its destruction. An action plan also includes a statement of measures proposed to protect critical habitat, and a socio-economic assessment of the action plan. For a complete description of what an action plan under SARA must include, please refer to section 49 (1) of the Act.
biophysical attributes
biological and physical characteristics (e.g., vegetation type, terrain, elevation, soil type, microhabitat features, etc.) used to describe the critical habitat of a species at risk.
competent minister
as defined in in section 2 of SARA, competent minister means (a) the Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency with respect to individuals in or on federal lands administered by that Agency; (b) the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans with respect to aquatic species, other than individuals mentioned in paragraph (a); and (c) the Minister of the Environment with respect to all other individuals. One of the responsibilities of a competent minister is to ensure that recovery strategies and action plans or a management plan is prepared for species listed on Schedule 1 of SARA.
conservation agreement
an agreement between a landowner and an agency intended to encourage conservation on privately managed land. One example of a conservation agreement is a conservation easement, which is a legally binding agreement (or instrument) whereby the landowner transfers specific rights to an easement holder, usually a nature conservation organization or agency, that may benefit a species at risk or enhance its survival in the wild. An easement may be granted to protect, enhance or restore a natural area, or simply preserve an open stretch of land. A voluntary easement may qualify as an ecological gift under the Income Tax Act of Canada.
COSEWIC
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. This Committee was established in 1977 to provide scientifically sound assessments on the status of wildlife species in Canada. The role of COSEWIC is to recommend to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change which species to include in SARA.
critical habitat
the habitat that is necessary for the survival or recovery of a listed wildlife species and that is identified as critical habitat in the recovery strategy or action plan for the species.
critical habitat identification
the first step in a process intended to ensure that critical habitat is protected from human activities that would result in its destruction. Critical habitat must be identified to the extent possible and be based on the best available information, within the timelines required for the completion of a recovery strategy or action plan.
endangered species
a wildlife species that is facing imminent extirpation or extinction.
extirpated species
a wildlife species that no longer exists in the wild in Canada, but exists elsewhere in the wild.
federal land
as defined in section 2 of SARA, federal land means (a) land that belongs to Her Majesty in right of Canada, or that Her Majesty in right of Canada has the power to dispose of, and all waters on and airspace above that land; (b) the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada; and (c) reserves and any other lands that are set apart for the use and benefit of a band under the Indian Act, and all waters on and airspace above those reserves and lands. Examples of federal lands include: National Parks, National Wildlife Areas, some Migratory Bird Sanctuaries, some Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada community pastures, First Nations reserve lands, and some military training areas.
habitat
as defined in section 2 of SARA (for non-aquatic species), habitat is the area or type of site where an individual or wildlife species naturally occurs or depends on directly or indirectly in order to carry out its life processes, or formerly occurred and has the potential to be reintroduced.
implementation schedule
a schedule that sets out the timing of specific recovery measures.
important habitat
areas that are deemed of importance to “species of special concern”.
management plan
as desribed in section 65 of SARA, a management plan must be prepared for species listed as special concern and must include measures for the conservation of the species that the competent Minister considers appropriate. The management plan may apply with respect to more than one wildlife species.  
measures proposed to protect critical habitat
(on non-federal lands) - instruments of a legally-binding nature under provincial or territorial laws or under SARA or other acts of Parliament, as well as conservation measures such as conservation agreements, that prevent critical habitat from being destroyed and ultimately contribute to the recovery of the species.
provincial lands
Crown Lands held by the province, where the land title and/or the abstract identify these lands as “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Saskatchewan”. Provincial lands include: park lands (e.g. Provincial Parks, Protected Areas), Fish and Wildlife Development Fund (FWDF) lands, Resource Crown Lands, and Agricultural Crown Lands.
provincial wildlife minister
any minister of the government of a province who is responsible for the conservation and management of a wildlife species in that province.
public comment period
consistent with SARA (s. 50(2)), a proposed Action Plan must be posted on the SAR Public Registry for a period of 60 days; any person may file written comments with the competent minister during that time. Within 30 days of the end of the public comment period all comments must be considered and the Action Plan finalized.
public registry
an online service that provides access to information and documents developed under SARA. It supports public participation in decision making, by providing an opportunity to comment on SARA-related documents being developed by the Government of Canada.   Available at Species at Risk Public Registry
recovery strategy
 a recovery planning document that describes the species and its needs, identifies the threats to the species and its habitat, identifies the species’ critical habitat to the extent possible based on the best available information, identifies population and distribution objectives for the species and a general description of the research and management activities needed to meet those objectives.  Please refer to section 41 (1) of SARA for a complete description of what a recovery strategy must address.
SARA
the Species at Risk Act is a federal act that takes a cooperative approach to working with land managers and provincial governments to protect species at risk and their habitats. The purposes of the Act are: 1) to prevent wildlife species from becoming extinct or extirpated (gone from the wild in Canada); 2) to help recover extirpated, endangered or threatened species, and 3) to manage species of special concern to prevent them from becoming endangered or threatened.
socio-economic evaluation
analysis required by SARA (s. 49(1)(e)) to be undertaken and included in an action plan. The competent minister must undertake an evaluation of the social and economic costs of recovery measures proposed in an action plan, ensuring that the scale and scope of the analysis is proportionate to the magnitude and complexity of potential impacts.
species at risk
an extirpated, endangered, or threatened species, or a species of special concern.
special concern
a wildlife species that may become a threatened or endangered because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats.
stakeholder
anyone who can affect the objectives of the SoD project or is affected by them (definition agreed on at SoD Stakeholders Meeting #5, June 4, 2013)
threatened species
a wildlife species that is likely to become endangered if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction.
threats assessment
assessment of natural and anthropogenic (man-made) threats to a species at risk, that if not reversed or mitigated may lead to the further endangerment of the species, or may prevent the recovery of the species. Threats are often cumulative in their effects; that is they operate together with other threats to adversely affect the species.
wildlife species
a species, subspecies, variety or geographically or genetically distinct population of animal, plant or other organism, other than a bacterium or virus, that is wild by nature and (a) is native to Canada; or (b) has extended its range into Canada without human intervention and has been present in Canada for at least 50 years.

Page details

Date modified: