Southern Resident Killer Whale: conservation agreement, 2019
Official title: A Species at Risk Act section 11 conservation agreement to support the recovery of the Southern Resident Killer Whale
This Species at Risk Act (SARA) Section 11 Conservation Agreement (the “Agreement”) to support the recovery of the Southern Resident Killer Whale is made as of this day of May 10, 2019.
Between the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, who is responsible for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (“DFO”) and the Minister of Transport, who is responsible for the Department of Transport (“TC”) and the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (“VFPA”) and the Pacific Pilotage Authority (“PPA”) and the Chamber of Shipping of British Columbia (“CSBC”) and the Shipping Federation of Canada (“SFC”) and Cruise Lines International Association (“CLIA”) and the Council of Marine Carriers (“CMC”) and the International Ship Owners Alliance of Canada (“ISAC” together with CSBC, SFC, CLIA and CMC the “Associations”)
(Collectively, the “Parties” and each a “Party”)
Preamble
Whereas the Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW) is a species listed as endangered under part 2 of Schedule 1 of SARA;
And whereas the purposes of SARA are to prevent wildlife species from being extirpated or becoming extinct, to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity and to manage species of special concern to prevent them from becoming endangered or threatened;
And whereas the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard is the competent minister under SARA for aquatic species, except with respect to individuals in or on federal lands administered by the Parks Canada Agency;
And whereas Canada is committed to the long-term conservation, survival and recovery of aquatic species at risk to ensure the long-term viability of species and to enhance their survival in the wild;
And whereas the recovery strategy and the action plan identify three major anthropogenic threats to the recovery of the SRKW population including reduced prey availability, environmental contaminants and acoustic and physical disturbance;
And whereas on May 24, 2018 the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard and the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada, as the Minister responsible for Parks Canada Agency, as competent ministers for the SRKW announced that they were of the opinion that the SRKW population faced imminent threats to its survival and recovery;
And whereas TC has jurisdiction over maritime traffic, has a mandate to promote efficient, environmentally responsible and safe transportation, and has a responsibility to address the environmental impacts of maritime transportation and to mitigate the effects of acoustic and physical disturbance and ship strikes on endangered marine mammals;
And whereas DFO collaborates to create the conditions necessary to enable responsible management and recovery of aquatic species at risk;
And whereas the VFPA has a mandate to facilitate Canada’s trade objectives, ensuring goods are moved safely, while protecting the environment and considering local communities;
And whereas in 2014 the VFPA initiated the Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) Program with the aim of better understanding and managing the impact of large commercial vessels activities on at-risk whales throughout the southern coast of British Columbia and with a long-term goal of developing mitigation measures that lead to a quantifiable reduction in threats to whales as a result of shipping activities;
And whereas DFO is acting in its role to support implementation of the recovery strategy and the action plan as it pertains to recovery objective 3 for SRKW to ensure that disturbance from human activities does not prevent recovery;
And whereas TC is acting in its role of managing the impact of large commercial vessels on SRKW;
And whereas the other Parties are acting in their capacity as participants in the ECHO program;
And whereas since 2014 the ECHO Program has benefited from ongoing input, advice and collaboration from the VFPA, PPA, the Associations and other members including Government of Canada representatives, scientists, Indigenous individuals and conservation and environmental groups, which assist the ECHO Program in its focus of research efforts, set goals and objectives and implement voluntary measures;
And whereas much of the ECHO Program’s focus to date has been on better understanding and reducing acoustic impacts of large commercial vessels on SRKW, and in 2017 and 2018, the ECHO Program developed, implemented and monitored voluntary measures focused on reducing underwater noise from large commercial vessels within key foraging areas of SRKW critical habitat;
And whereas the PPA has a mandate to provide safe, reliable and efficient marine pilotage and related services in the coastal waters of British Columbia;
And whereas the Associations represent large commercial vessels and commit to continue working to ensure their respective members are contributing to efforts to reduce acoustic and physical threats to the SRKW from their operations;
And whereas the Parties recognize the value of the stewardship approach to species conservation, and have demonstrated commitment to the collaborative process in the conservation, survival and recovery of SRKW as facilitated by the ECHO Program;
And whereas the Parties wish to cooperate in the taking of measures to support survival and recovery of the SRKW as aligned with the recovery goal and objectives in the recovery strategy and recovery measures in the action plan, as well as in any future recovery documents prepared in accordance with SARA legislative requirements;
And whereas the critical habitat of SRKW is currently defined to include coastal waters off British Columbia and overlaps with the shipping lane used by large commercial vessels that call at the Port of Vancouver;
And whereas Section 11 of SARA provides that the competent minister may, after consultation with every other competent minister, and with the Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council or any of its members if he or she considers it appropriate to do so, enter into a conservation agreement with any government in Canada, organization or person to benefit a species at risk or enhance its survival in the wild.
And whereas such a conservation agreement must provide for the taking of conservation measures and any other measures consistent with the purposes of SARA, and may include measures with respect to monitoring the status of the SRKW population; developing and implementing education and public awareness programs; developing and implementing recovery strategies, action plans and management plans; protecting the SRKW populations’ habitat, including its critical habitat; or undertaking research projects in support of recovery efforts for the SRKW population.
And whereas the Parties recognize the need for an adaptive approach to guide and adjust over time those conservation measures taken pursuant to this agreement, as more information becomes available.
And whereas there are no current regulations that relate to reducing threats specifically from large commercial vessels in SRKW critical habitat;
Now therefore, the Parties commit to the following:
1 Definitions
- 1.1. the following terms defined hereunder and used in this agreement, when capitalized, will have the following meaning:
- 1.1.1 “action plan” means the SARA Action Plan for the Northern and Southern Resident Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) in Canada, 2017
- 1.1.2 “acoustic disturbance” means anthropogenic noise that interferes with SRKW life functions including feeding and foraging, reproduction, socializing, and resting such that the marine environment cannot support effective acoustic social signalling and echolocation and results in loss of habitat availability and/or function
- 1.1.3 “annual report” means an annual public report describing the implementation of measures undertaken as part of this agreement which will address:
- 1.1.3.1 progress against annual and five-year term commitments made by the Parties under this agreement
- 1.1.3.2 a summary of annual research findings
- 1.1.4 “best available information” includes relevant scientific, technical, navigational safety, operational, commercial and economic data, community and Indigenous traditional knowledge
- 1.1.5 “committee” means a committee entitled the Conservation Agreement Management Committee, created by the Parties under the ECHO Program, to oversee the implementation and the effectiveness of this agreement
- 1.1.6 “ECHO program” means the VFPA-led Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation Program which is aimed at better understanding and managing the impact of shipping activities on at-risk whales throughout the southern coast of British Columbia
- 1.1.7 “effective Date” means the date of the last signature affixed to this agreement
- 1.1.8 “large commercial vessels” means vessels such as bulk carriers, tankers, container or cruise vessels to which the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea applies and to tugs which are engaged in towing other vessels or objects or assisting in the manoeuvring of ocean going vessels
- 1.1.9 “physical disturbance” the physical presence and proximity of large commercial vessels to individual SRKW that impedes functions such as feeding, foraging, reproduction, socializing or resting , which may affect SRKW at both the individual and population level;
- 1.1.10 “recovery strategy” means SARA Recovery Strategy for the Northern and Southern Resident Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) in Canada (2008, amended in 2011, and 2018)
- 1.1.11 “SARA” means the Species at Risk Act
- 1.1.12 “SRKW” means Southern Resident Killer Whale
- 1.2 for those terms that are defined in SARA, the terms in SARA apply to this agreement, unless defined in section 1 of this agreement
2 Goal and purpose
- 2.1 the goal of this agreement is to reduce the acoustic and physical disturbance to SRKW by large commercial vessels in Pacific Canadian waters, in particular those vessels that call at the Port of Vancouver, or otherwise operate in SRKW critical habitat, through the continuation of existing voluntary efforts and the commitment to develop and implement new voluntary threat reduction measures to support the recovery of the SRKW
- 2.2 the purposes of this agreement are to:
- 2.2.2 formalize the participation of the Parties in the ECHO Program, through which participation the Parties will work collaboratively towards the development, implementation, monitoring, assessment and adaptation of voluntary measures to reduce the contribution of large commercial vessels to threats to SRKW
- 2.2.2 formalize the role of the ECHO Program in advancing research and educational outreach to better understand how large commercial vessels contribute to threats to SRKW and their critical habitats
3 Principles
- 3.1 The following principles will guide interpretation and implementation of this agreement:
- 3.1.1 collaboration – the Parties will cooperate in the development, delivery, testing, monitoring and evaluation of measures that may better inform and reduce the contribution of large commercial vessels to the threats to SRKW
- 3.1.2 threat reduction – the efforts of the Parties will be designed to work toward achieving quantifiable reductions to the contribution of large commercial vessels to the threats to SRKW
- 3.1.3 safety – navigational safety will be a primary consideration in the development and delivery of measures to reduce the contribution of large commercial vessels to the threats to SRKW
- 3.1.4 commercial and operational realities – the Parties will take commercial and operational realities of ship owners, operators and ship agents into consideration in the development and delivery of measures to reduce the contribution of large commercial vessels to the threats to SRKW
- 3.1.5 adaptation – the Parties recognize that monitoring the effectiveness of existing and future threat reduction measures to abate threats from large commercial vessels and adjusting approaches as necessary will be critical to success
- 3.1.6 co-benefits – the Parties will seek opportunities to implement threat reduction measures for SRKW that may also offer co-benefits to other species at risk
- 3.1.7 transparency – the Parties will make non-confidential information related to the development, implementation and monitoring of research and threat reduction measures publicly available subject to section 8.2 of this agreement, any applicable data sharing agreements and any legislative provisions that would prevent them from doing so
- 3.1.8 engagement – the Parties will seek opportunities for engagement with Indigenous groups and other key stakeholders as collaborators or partners
4 Interpretation
- 4.1 the preamble hereof and any appendices hereto form an integral part of this agreement
- 4.2 this agreement is not intended to create any legally binding obligations, duties, commitments or liabilities (contractual or otherwise) on any of the parties. Nor does it create any new legal powers on the part of the Parties or affect in any way the powers, duties and functions of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans under the SARA, the Fisheries Act or any other federal legislation, or the Minister of Transport under the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, the Canada Marine Act, or any other federal legislation
- 4.3 the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard enters into this agreement under the authority of Section 11 of SARA
5 Actions to support the recovery of Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW)
- 5.1 the Parties acknowledge that:
- 5.1.1 recovery of the SRKW population will require an ecosystem approach applied on a long-term basis that takes into consideration all three main threats to SRKW and will require additional measures to those undertaken by the Parties pursuant to this agreement
- 5.1.2 effective implementation of recovery measures is a multifaceted and complex undertaking that depends on the commitment and cooperation of many different constituencies that will be involved in implementing the directions set out in the recovery strategy and action plan and is subject to appropriations, priorities, and budgetary constraints of the participating jurisdictions and organizations
- 5.1.3 other limiting factors that may affect SRKW survival and recovery are beyond the influence of the Parties, including but not limited to events occurring in SRKW critical habitat in US waters
- 5.1.4 with the best available information from the voluntary measures focused on reducing underwater noise from large commercial vessels within key foraging areas of SRKW critical habitat which have been implemented to date and show positive benefits in terms of underwater noise reduction, the Parties commit to ongoing implementation of similar voluntary efforts in support of SRKW survival and recovery
- 5.2 in support of the goal set out in section 2.1 and subject to section 9.1, the Parties commit to the relevant measures below, which are further detailed in Appendix A
- 5.2.1 VFPA commits to the following:
- continuing to manage the ECHO Program, including the following measures:
- provide an ongoing framework for engagement, trust building, collaboration and information sharing for the Parties and other ECHO Program participants
- coordinate with the Parties and other ECHO Program participants to develop and implement annual work plans that support the goal of the agreement
- coordinate with the Parties the advancement of selected research projects to fill priority knowledge gaps and inform the development of SRKW threat reduction targets and measures for large commercial vessels
- coordinate with the Parties and other ECHO Program participants to identify appropriate, biologically relevant SRKW threat reduction targets for large commercial vessels using best available information
- coordinate with the Parties and other ECHO Program participants to develop and implement measures that have the potential to reduce threats to SRKW from large commercial vessels
- coordinate with the Parties and other ECHO Program participants to monitor, evaluate and report on the efficacy of those threat reduction measures
- coordinate with the Parties and other ECHO Program participants to integrate new information, as appropriate, into an adaptive framework for planning and implementation of future measures
- maintain educational outreach efforts to raise awareness of new and emerging research and measures relating to large commercial vessels
- working with TC to develop a strategy to encourage underwater noise reduction incentives in other ports in Canada and internationally
- continuing to manage the ECHO Program, including the following measures:
- 5.2.2 the PPA commits to the following:
- continuing to actively participate in the ECHO Program to advance the development and implementation of SRKW threat reduction targets and measures addressing impacts from large commercial vessels
- continuing to support evaluation, and provide input on the navigational safety aspects of relevant research projects and voluntary measures being implemented through the ECHO Program
- continuing to support the ECHO Program with the provision of data from PPA vessel transit records
- continuing to make all efforts to encourage a high level of participation from the BC Coast Pilots in the voluntary measures being implemented through the ECHO Program
- exploring opportunities to improve efficiencies in the pilotage system to reduce barriers to participation in the voluntary initiatives
- 5.2.3 the Associations commit to the following:
- Continuing to actively participate in the ECHO Program to advance the development and implementation of SRKW threat reduction targets and measures addressing impacts from large commercial vessels
- continuing to support evaluation, and provide input on the navigational safety aspects of relevant research projects and voluntary measures being implemented through the ECHO Program
- continuing to support research efforts to identify and implement technical solutions such as, for instance, vessel design or retrofit options, to reduce underwater noise from large commercial vessels
- continuing to make all efforts to encourage a high level of participation from their members in the voluntary measures being implemented through the ECHO Program
- 5.2.4 TC commits to the following:
- continuing to actively participate in the ECHO Program and providing timely advice on key government priorities
- sharing data and outcomes of TC research projects with the ECHO Program participants
- continuing to lead discussions and collaborations with the United States Coast Guard, the Canadian Coast Guard, Indigenous groups and other relevant stakeholders as it relates to the development and implementation of voluntary SRKW threat reduction measures referred to in this agreement, in or near trans-boundary waters
- continuing efforts to develop an underwater hydrophone network in SRKW critical habitat to better assess the underwater noise contributions of vessels and measure the noise profile of individual vessels
- providing international leadership on the issue of quiet ship design, and engaging with the other Parties to ensure ongoing input and involvement in international discussions on technical solutions to underwater noise mitigation
- continuing to discuss with the Parties the challenges that ship owners may face as a result of the implementation of voluntary measures under this agreement, and work to identify ways to potentially mitigate those impacts, if possible
- working with VFPA to develop a strategy to encourage underwater noise incentives in other ports in Canada and internationally
- 5.2.5 DFO commits to the following:
- continuing to actively participate in the ECHO Program and providing timely advice on key government priorities and on the development of programs and projects to ensure they support the survival and recovery needs of the SRKW, as well as sharing data and outcomes of DFO-led SRKW research projects
- continuing efforts to develop an underwater hydrophone network in key areas in support of the implementation of the agreement
- cooperating and consulting with the other Parties on the amendment, if any, of the recovery strategy and action plan and insofar as it is able, provide the other Parties with an advanced opportunity to comment and provide feedback on the proposed measures for survival, recovery and protection of SRKW
- 5.2.1 VFPA commits to the following:
- 5.3 the Parties will work together to identify and consider the application of technological, design and operational methods of reducing threats to SRKW from large commercial vessels
- 5.4 the Parties will work together to identify needs, priorities and funding opportunities to implement the engagement, research, outreach and threat reduction measures identified in this agreement
- 5.5 through the ECHO Program, the Parties will work together to identify possible geographic areas within SRKW critical habitat to trial and implement voluntary measures that operationally mitigate underwater noise from large commercial vessels
6 Governance
- 6.1 the Parties will establish the Committee to oversee the implementation and the effectiveness of this agreement
- 6.2 the Committee will have representation from one member of each of the Parties, and be governed by a terms of reference developed and agreed to by the Committee
- 6.3 the Committee will meet a minimum of once per year
7 Monitoring and reporting
- 7.1 as part of the ECHO Program’s annual work planning and evaluation process, the Committee will ensure that a monitoring and assessment framework is developed and implemented to facilitate measurement of progress on actions identified within this agreement
- 7.2 the Committee will ensure that goals, milestones and timelines are included in the monitoring and assessment framework and that, employing an adaptive approach, these goals, milestones and timelines are revisited and updated annually
- 7.3 the Committee will review the status of this agreement against the agreed upon monitoring and assessment framework and working with the ECHO Program prepare and issue the annual report
- 7.4 based on the annual report, the Parties will evaluate the actions annually and propose any additional commitments to increase the likelihood of achieving reductions to any acoustic and physical disturbance from large commercial vessels to support the recovery of SRKW
- 7.5 prior to the end of year five of this agreement, the Committee, working with the ECHO Program, will prepare a report on outputs, outcomes and deliverables of the agreement in relation to reducing threats to SRKW from large commercial vessels. This report will be used to inform discussions on possible renewal of this agreement
8 Information sharing
- 8.1. each Party agrees, subject to section 8.2 and to any applicable data sharing agreements, policies and legislative provisions that would prevent them from doing so, to provide the other Parties access at no charge to available data and information relevant to the implementation of this agreement
- 8.2. some data and information, such as vessel specific data, may be considered commercially sensitive and require confidentiality or may have been obtained with an understanding of confidentiality. Data and information so identified by a Party, or a collaborator in programs and activities related to this agreement, will be held confidential by the VFPA, as manager of the ECHO Program, and shall not be distributed to any other Parties or beyond at any time or in any manner, without the explicit agreement of the affected Party or collaborator in programs
- 8.3. DFO shall share information with, and provide notification to, the other Parties of upcoming recovery and planning initiatives and implementation in as timely a manner as feasible
- 8.4. TC shall share information and provide notification to the other Parties of activities, events or projects in the area covered by this agreement that could reasonably affect measures outlined to be taken in this agreement in as timely a manner as feasible
- 8.5. the VFPA, PPA and Associations shall share information and provide notification to the other Parties, in so far as they are able to and in as timely a manner as feasible, of activities, events or projects in the area covered by this agreement that could reasonably affect measures outlined to be taken in this agreement
9 Financial consideration
- 9.1 the Parties acknowledge and agree that implementation of this agreement and the commitments of the Parties contained herein are subject to their respective appropriations, priorities, funding and budgetary constraints
10 Term, modification and renewal
- this agreement commences on the effective date and will remain in force for a term of five years from the effective date
- this agreement can only be amended or extended with the written consent of all of the Parties
- any Party may withdraw from this agreement by giving not less than three months written notice to the other Parties
- each Party acknowledges that should it fail to implement the commitments it has made in this agreement, the remaining Parties, acting jointly, have the discretion to require that Party to withdraw from the agreement
- the Parties may include additional non-governmental conservation organizations, government agencies, industry and other sectors to this agreement, with the mutual written consent of all the Parties
11 Dispute resolution
- 11.1 the Parties will endeavour to resolve issues regarding the interpretation and implementation of the agreement in a timely manner using mechanisms available at the Committee level and agree to share all relevant information, negotiate in good faith, and use an interest-based approach to produce a fair resolution. Where a dispute arises under this agreement that cannot be resolved through this approach or, if necessary, by consultations between the representatives of the Parties, it shall be processed as follows:
- 11.1.1 the complaining Party shall prepare a written statement summarizing the issues, and shall deliver the statement to the Committee
- 11.1.2 within 30 days from the submission of the statement, the Committee shall convene a meeting between a senior executive of Environmental Policy for TC and/or DFO and a chosen representative from each of the other Parties, but not the complaining Party, to resolve the dispute. Delegates of these Parties will be allowed only if the delegates have full decision-making authority to attempt to resolve the dispute
- 11.1.3 if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute, then the complaining Party may give notice to withdraw from the agreement in accordance with section 10.3
12 Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) program not fettered
- 12.1 nothing in this agreement shall alter the governance structure, goal or mission of the ECHO Program. Furthermore, nothing in this agreement shall derogate or otherwise fetter the ability of the VFPA to alter, modify or discontinue the ECHO Program at any time or from time to time
13 Association not fettered
- 13.1 nothing in this agreement shall alter the mandate and the activities of the Associations
14 Parliament not fettered
- 14.1. nothing in this agreement shall in any way affect the powers, duties or functions of the Parliament of Canada or the executive
15 Minister not fettered
- 15.1. nothing in this agreement shall in any way affect the powers, duties or functions of the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, the Minister of TC or any other Minister
16 Signatures
In witness whereof, the Parties have executed this Conservation agreement as of the dates set out below:
Jonathan Wilkinson
Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
Terry Beech
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
And
On behalf of the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, as represented by its President and Chief Executive Officer and Corporate Secretary:
Robin Silvester, President and Chief Executive Officer
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
Mark Gustafson, Corporate Secretary
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
On behalf of the Pacific Pilotage Authority, as represented by its Chief Executive Officer:
Kevin Obermeyer, Chief Executive Officer
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
On behalf of the Chamber of Shipping of British Columbia, as represented by its President:
Robert Lewis-Manning, President
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
On behalf of the Shipping Federation of Canada, as represented by its President:
Michael Broad, President
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
On behalf of the Cruise Lines International Association, as represented by its Senior Vice President, Maritime Policy:
Brian Salerno, Senior Vice President, Maritime Policy
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
On behalf of the Council of Marine Carriers, as represented by its President:
Phil Nelson, President
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
On behalf of the International Ship-owners Alliance of Canada, as represented by its Secretary General:
Lanna Hodgson, Secretary General
Signed on the 10 day of May 2019.
Conservation agreement
Appendix A: Southern Resident Killer Whales recovery measures table
Party leading activity:
$ Vancouver Fraser Port Authority
# Government of Canada (GoC: TC and/or DFO)
* All Parties
A. Regional engagement and collaborative efforts
Measure | Activity | Objective over the term of the agreement | Period 1 = 1 year from agreement signing | Period 2 = 2 years from agreement signing | Period 3 = 3 years from agreement signing | Period 4 = 4 years from Agreement Signing | Period 5 = 5 years from agreement signing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1 | Maintain management of ECHO Program$ | Maintain framework for ongoing engagement and collaboration; advancing research; coordinating, development, implementation, evaluation and reporting of voluntary Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW) threat reduction measures; and, promoting and raising awareness of research and threat reduction measures. | Convene 3-4 ECHO Program Advisory Working Group meetings per year to seek input and guidance. Convene ECHO Program Conservation Agreement and Technical Committee (Vessel Operator Committee and Acoustic Technical Committee) meetings on an as needed basis throughout the year to seek input and advice. Rely on input and advice to adaptively manage program. | Convene 3-4 ECHO Program Advisory Working Group meetings per year to seek input and guidance. Convene ECHO Program Conservation Agreement and Technical Committee (Vessel Operator Committee and Acoustic Technical Committee) meetings on an as needed basis throughout the year to seek input and advice. Rely on input and advice to adaptively manage program. | Convene 3-4 ECHO Program Advisory Working Group meetings per year to seek input and guidance. Convene ECHO Program Conservation Agreement and Technical Committee (Vessel Operator Committee and Acoustic Technical Committee) meetings on an as needed basis throughout the year to seek input and advice. Rely on input and advice to adaptively manage program. | Convene 3-4 ECHO Program Advisory Working Group meetings per year to seek input and guidance. Convene ECHO Program Conservation Agreement and Technical Committee (Vessel Operator Committee and Acoustic Technical Committee) meetings on an as needed basis throughout the year to seek input and advice. Rely on input and advice to adaptively manage program. | Convene 3-4 ECHO Program Advisory Working Group meetings per year to seek input and guidance. Convene ECHO Program Conservation Agreement and Technical Committee (Vessel Operator Committee and Acoustic Technical Committee) meetings on an as needed basis throughout the year to seek input and advice. Rely on input and advice to adaptively manage program. |
A2 | GoC continue to engage with Indigenous groups and stakeholders on vessel related threats to SRKW and implementation of threat reduction measures# | Continue to enable involvement of Indigenous groups in the development and implementation of SRKW-related initiatives. Identify annual forums for engagement. |
Maintain engagement with Indigenous groups to facilitate collaboration in the development and implementation of SRKW-related initiatives. Review and update identified annual forums for engagement. |
Maintain engagement with Indigenous groups to facilitate collaboration in the development and implementation of SRKW-related initiatives. Review and update identified annual forums for engagement. |
Maintain engagement with Indigenous groups to facilitate collaboration in the development and implementation of SRKW-related initiatives. Review and update identified annual forums for engagement. |
Maintain engagement with Indigenous groups to facilitate collaboration in the development and implementation of SRKW-related initiatives. Review and update identified annual forums for engagement. |
Maintain engagement with Indigenous groups to facilitate collaboration in the development and implementation of SRKW-related initiatives. Review and update identified annual forums for engagement. |
A3 | Provide relevant input to broader initiatives around the development of underwater noise targets* | Contribute to ongoing discussions on the development of underwater noise reduction targets. | Share technical perspective and relevant data/evidence from existing ECHO research projects and participate in initiatives to advance the development of underwater noise targets. | Participate in initiatives to advance the development of underwater noise targets. If available, apply draft target to ECHO Program voluntary initiatives. | If available, apply draft targets to ECHO Program voluntary initiatives. Monitor and evaluate for feasibility and effectiveness. Adapt accordingly. |
If available, apply draft targets to ECHO Program voluntary initiatives. Monitor and evaluate for feasibility and effectiveness. Adapt accordingly. |
If available, apply draft targets to ECHO Program voluntary initiatives. Monitor and evaluate for feasibility and effectiveness. Adapt accordingly. |
B. International engagement and collaborative efforts
Measure | Activity | Objective over the term of the agreement | Period 1 = 1 year from agreement signing | Period 2 = 2 years from agreement signing | Period 3 = 3 years from agreement signing | Period 4 = 4 years from agreement signing | Period 5 = 5 years from agreement signing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B1 | Engage US authorities, on vessel related threats to SRKW and implementation of threat reduction measures# | Establish commitments on recovery measures from US authorities in shared waterways in SRKW critical habitat. | Identify and conduct joint US-Canada consultative fora on SRKW recovery in shared waterways, using where possible the ECHO Program as a consultative forum for matters relating to large commercial vessels. | Advance agreement/partnership on joint US-Canadian actions toward SRKW recovery in shared waterways, using where possible the ECHO Program as a consultative forum for matters relating to large commercial vessels | Ongoing consultation between Canada/U.S. on joint action that can be taken with a focus on implementing harmonized measures in shared waterways. | Ongoing consultation between Canada/U.S. on joint action that can be taken with a focus on implementing harmonized measures in shared waterways. | Ongoing consultation between Canada/U.S. on joint action that can be taken with a focus on implementing harmonized measures in shared waterways. |
B2 | Encourage dialogue and technical discussions on reducing ship generated noise through the IMO and other international fora# | Propose a new work output that may result in updates to IMO MEPC.1/Circ.833 (April 2014) guidelines for the reduction of underwater noise from commercial shipping. | Conduct an international workshop to share findings on quiet ship designs and technology in early 2019 to inform next steps. | Identify and test recommendations on ship design and technology and operating practices. Work with international partners to include a new work output on the IMO work plan on underwater noise. | Work with international partners to advance discussions at the IMO. | - | - |
B3 | Encourage Canadian and other relevant international ports to consider implementing# incentives for quiet vessels# | Increase the number of vessels with quiet vessel design, technologies and/or notations. | Conduct consultation on implementation of green port incentives at the national levels (for all Canadian Port Authorities) | Continue engagement at both National and international level to develop network of port incentive programs. | - | - | - |
B4 | Convene vessel classification societies and technical experts to develop and align category-specific quiet vessel notations# | Establish consistent measurement and analysis procedures, and quiet vessel notations between ship classification societies such that incentives offered at Port of Vancouver and elsewhere are also consistent. | Conduct assessment of different quiet vessel notations. | Based on assessment, identify appropriate next steps to advance objective. | - | - | - |
C. Data Collection and research
Measure | Activity | Objective over the term of the agreement | Period 1 = 1 year from agreement signing | Period 2 = 2 years from agreement signing | Period 3 = 3 years from agreement signing | Period 4 = 4 years from agreement signing | Period 5 = 5 years from agreement signing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | Support the development and maintenance of an underwater hydrophone network in SRKW critical habitat # | Measure ambient underwater noise levels throughout SRKW critical habitat, assess contributions of large commercial vessels, support whale detection activities, and monitor the effectiveness of implemented mitigation measures for large commercial vessels. | Engage with regional partners with existing/planned hydrophone capacity to explore opportunities for resource/information sharing. Initiate identification and mapping of existing hydrophones and linkages available on the west coast, including format, calibration, temporal and spatial distribution, and investigate opportunities for data sharing. |
Identify data gaps in calibrated hydrophone coverage and seek funding for additional hydrophones or listening devices where gaps exist or where improvements of existing hydrophones is beneficial. Initiate identification of recommendations from C2 that may be generally applied as best practices and methodology for acoustic data collection (deployment methodology & standard for data collection for data analysis and archiving) to enable compilation of metadata. |
Review on an ongoing basis the need for additional underwater hydrophones and build on improving existing hydrophone network to address gaps. Encourage adoption of identified standard acoustic data collection and analysis protocols (e.g., C2 output) and implement where feasible. |
Review on an ongoing basis the need for additional underwater hydrophones and build on improving existing hydrophone network to address gaps. Encourage adoption of identified standard acoustic data collection and analysis protocols (e.g., C2 output) and implement where feasible. |
Review on an ongoing basis the need for additional underwater hydrophones and build on improving existing hydrophone network to address gaps. Encourage adoption of identified standard acoustic data collection and analysis protocols (e.g., C2 output) and implement where feasible. |
C2 | Evaluate ECHO regional ambient noise data which was collected in 2016-2017$ | Establish what factors are contributing to existing ambient noise levels within SRKW critical habitat and determine ongoing monitoring needs for evaluating changes and trends into the future | Advance project to establish what are the factors (anthropogenic and environmental) that contribute to ambient noise and what data needs to be collected and analyzed to understand if mitigation measures are effective. Convene ECHO Acoustic Technical Committee to evaluate results and input to final report which will include recommendations for standards of future monitoring methodology, calibration, metadata collection and analysis. |
Share study findings with relevant regional hydrophone operators and participate in any efforts to standardize monitoring and data collection approaches in the region. | Revisit study recommendations as appropriate. | Revisit study recommendations as appropriate. | Revisit study recommendations as appropriate. |
C3 | Establish underwater listening station in SRKW critical habitat # | Implement listening station infrastructure to allow vessel operators to measure the individual noise profiles of their vessels; facilitate research testing of vessel quietening technologies/operations; and, allow the ECHO Program to continue gathering and analyzing vessel noise data for research purposes and to evaluate the potential for offering new port incentives | Identify suitable location(s) for ULS, obtain funding and deploy infrastructure. | Monitor vessel source levels in real time. Make data available to vessel owners upon request. Advance testing of vessel quietening options. | Monitor vessel source levels in real time. Make data available to vessel owners upon request. Advance testing of vessel quietening options. | Monitor vessel source levels in real time. Make data available to vessel owners upon request. Advance testing of vessel quietening options. | Monitor vessel source levels in real time. Make data available to vessel owners upon request. Advance testing of vessel quietening options. |
C4 | Evaluate existing ECHO Program database of vessel source level measurements$ | Evaluate how different vessel design characteristics may be driving the noise profile of vessels. Identify key characteristics/commonalities of quietest and loudest vessels | Advance project to establish key drivers. Share findings and conclusions. | Share study findings and conclusions. | - | - | - |
C5 | Advance research studies to explore new underwater noise reduction measures for large commercial vessels* (To be updated annually based on agreement of new/emerging potential measures) | Test/trial new design, technologies and/or operational measures that may reduce underwater noise from vessels, particularly in SRKW critical habitat and within key SRKW foraging areas | Advance feasibility study to evaluate potential for changing portions of the traffic separation scheme in SRKW critical habitat. # | Action to be determined based on year 1 assessment. | - | - | - |
C6 | Test noise profiles and fuel consumption rates of three ocean-going vessels before and after hull cleaning$ | Determine whether hull cleaning reduces a vessel’s underwater noise profile and improves its fuel efficiency | Release study findings, along with recommendations in a report. | Depending on recommendations, ECHO Program and other parties to encourage/promote hull cleaning as a means to reduce vessel noise. | - | - | - |
C7 | Through computer modelling, predict how the underwater noise levels from different types of large commercial vessels change with distance from the source $ | Generate visual representations of the noise footprint around different commercial vessels at different speeds to help inform vessel operators of the areal extents of potential vessel noise impacts to SRKW | Create and distribute educational materials for professional mariners to use on the bridge. | - | - | - | - |
D. Initiatives to reduce underwater noise from large commercial vessels (LCVs)
Measure | Activity | Objective over the term of the agreement | Period 1 = 1 year from agreement signing | Period 2 = 2 years from agreement signing | Period 3 = 3 years from agreement signing | Period 4 = 4 years from agreement signing | Period 5 = 5 years from agreement signing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | Establish voluntary seasonal slowdown of large commercial vessels in Haro Strait* | Reduce ambient underwater noise levels at the Lime Kiln hydrophone by an amount comparable to that achieved in 2017 or in line with underwater noise reduction targets when they are developed. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. |
D2 | Based on SRKW usage and subject to navigational safety and operational considerations, identify other possible candidate areas within SRKW critical habitat to implement voluntary seasonal slowdowns of large commercial vessels* | Reduce underwater noise from large commercial vessels in other key SRKW foraging areas comparable to that achieved in Haro Strait in 2017 or in line with underwater noise reduction targets when they are developed. | Based on assessment of safety and evaluation of feasibility, impacts and benefits of implementing a voluntary vessel slowdown in Boundary Pass, implement a trial voluntary vessel slowdown in Boundary Pass and evaluate vessel noise reduction levels relative to those achieved in Haro Strait or in line with underwater noise reduction targets when they are developed. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. | Review noise reduction levels achieved during previous slowdown year and revisit voluntary maximum speed targets and slowdown duration as needed for implementation in future year. |
D3 | Address commercial and operational constraints to expanding the area and/or duration of vessel slowdowns* | Eliminate barriers to full participation and/or compensate those that are negatively affected economically such that they can fully participate. | Identify main barriers to implementation (to support full participation); prioritize actions needed to eliminate such barriers; begin implementation of such actions, starting in the 2019 season, to the extent possible; and, establish framework for compensation for those negatively affected, where barriers to implementation cannot be otherwise eliminated |
Assess progress made on a yearly basis and re-adjust actions needed to eliminate barriers to implementation going forward (including framework for compensation as required) | Assess progress made on a yearly basis and re-adjust actions needed to eliminate barriers to implementation going forward (including framework for compensation as required) | Assess progress made on a yearly basis and re-adjust actions needed to eliminate barriers to implementation going forward (including framework for compensation as required) | Assess progress made on a yearly basis and re-adjust actions needed to eliminate barriers to implementation going forward (including framework for compensation as required) |
D4 | Improve direct effect of vessel speed reductions by implementing real-time tracking and notification of SRKW locations year round* | Provide SRKW presence notification tools to professional mariners, to potentially reduce speed and associated noise impacts to SRKW in real time and year round. | - | Consider what-if scenarios based on real-time tracking and vessels in the vicinity of SRKW to determine effectiveness of dynamic management. | Trial specific ships, areas where real-time notification may be effective over a one-month period. Measure and monitor speed and impact (safety/cost). | - | - |
Measure | Activity | Objective over the term of the agreement | Period 1 = 1 year from agreement signing | Period 2 = 2 years from agreement signing | Period 3 = 3 years from agreement signing | Period 4 = 4 years from agreement signing | Period 5 = 5 years from agreement signing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D5 | Evaluate effect of lateral displacement outbound in Strait of Juan de Fuca based on 2018 trial results* | If results indicate a positive reduction of ambient underwater noise levels at DFO hydrophones in key SRKW foraging areas and where it is safe and operationally feasible to do so, work collaboratively with Indigenous groups and transboundary partners to consider continuing implementation of similar seasonal lateral displacement measures in future years. | Review AIS track data for all vessels during the trial period. Identify any safety concerns and obtain results of underwater noise levels at key foraging areas to determine noise reductions as a result of the trial. If positive underwater noise reduction results and agreement with Indigenous groups and transboundary partners are reached, implement a voluntary lateral displacement in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, with any adjustments deemed appropriate based on results. |
Where results continue to be positive and agreement with Indigenous groups and transboundary partners are reached, continue implementation of voluntary lateral displacement. | Where results continue to be positive and agreement with Indigenous groups and transboundary partners are reached, continue implementation of voluntary lateral displacement. | Where results continue to be positive and agreement with Indigenous groups and transboundary partners are reached, continue implementation of voluntary lateral displacement. | Where results continue to be positive and agreement with Indigenous groups and transboundary partners are reached, continue implementation of voluntary lateral displacement. |
D6 | Based on the effectiveness of 2018 Strait of Juan de Fuca trial results, SRKW usage and subject to navigational safety and operational considerations, identify other possible candidate areas within SRKW critical habitat to implement large commercial vessels lateral displacement measures * | Reduce underwater noise from large commercial vessels in other key SRKW foraging areas in line with underwater noise reduction targets when they are developed. | - | If results of lateral displacement demonstrate positive outcomes, consider other areas where a lateral displacement may be implement, subject to assessment of safety considerations. | Actions to be determined based on previous year. | - | - |
Measure | Activity | Objective over the term of the agreement | Period 1 = 1 year from agreement signing | Period 2 = 2 years from agreement signing | Period 3 = 3 years from agreement signing | Period 4 = 4 years from agreement signing | Period 5 = 5 years from agreement signing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D7 | Continue to offer and potentially expand available VFPA EcoAction incentives for those who have taken action to reduce underwater noise from their vessel$ | Continue to promote the availability of EcoAction incentives to vessels calling Port of Vancouver with the goal of reducing underwater noise from large commercial vessels in SRKW critical habitat. |
Work with partners, including class societies and Green Marine, to promote availability of EcoAction incentives. | Work with partners, including class societies and Green Marine, to promote availability of EcoAction incentives. | - | - | - |
D8 | Evaluate the potential for offering ‘quiet vessels’ an option to opt out of voluntary noise reduction operational mitigations such as slowdowns* | Evaluate appropriate source level thresholds for ‘quiet vessels’, encourage and drive innovation towards application of quiet vessel technology and design. | - | Assess threshold of what would be considered a “quiet vessel” that could be considered for the opt out, including mechanism for evaluating and endorsing the opt out. | Continue assessment with a view to implement opt out option at the earliest, if deemed appropriate. | - | - |
Measure | Activity | Objective over the term of the agreement | Period 1 = 1 year from agreement signing | Period 2 = 2 years from agreement signing | Period 3 = 3 years from agreement signing | Period 4 = 4 years from agreement signing | Period 5 = 5 years from agreement signing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D9 | Work to better understand and seek opportunities to test the optimization of vessel sailing times within existing shipping regime.* | Subject to assessing benefits of such an approach, optimize existing sailing schedules to create longer windows where commercial vessels are not present in key SRKW foraging areas, when whales are present. | - | - | Engage with key regional stakeholders (including but not limited to the parties, BCCP, Coast guard, terminals and agents) to better understand drivers for existing scheduling and to identify potential opportunities for optimizing vessel sailing times. | Subject to preliminary assessment of feasibility of such an approach, test optimization of sailing times and determine frequency and duration of additional times where commercial vessels are not present in SRKW foraging areas. | - |
E. Initiatives to reduce physical disturbance from large commercial vessels
Measure | Activity | Objective over the term of the agreement | Period 1 = 1 year from agreement signing | Period 2 = 2 years from agreement signing | Period 3 = 3 years from agreement signing | Period 4 = 4 years from agreement signing | Period 5 = 5 years from agreement signing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | Test a real-time whale notification system for professional mariners called WhaleReport Alert System (WRAS) and evaluate its utility, benefits and effectiveness.$# | Provide a notification tool to professional mariners which provides real time information on the location of whales with the goal of reducing threats from commercial vessels in SRKW critical habitat. | Roll out and test the WRAS (mobile app and desk based system) and seek feedback from users to evaluate its functionality, utility and effectiveness. | Based on user feedback, make enhancement modifications and build on existing tool to continue making a whale notification tool available to professional mariners. | Continue building on the existing tool. Consider adding other whale detection data sources to WRAS (e.g. from hydrophones, gliders etc.). | - | - |
E2 | Develop online training module for professional mariners to help them identify whales, reduce vessel related threats and safely navigate in their presence.$ | Make online training tutorial available to all mariners on ECHO Program website and encourage regional vessel operators to build the tutorial into their corporate training programs. | Make final tutorial available to users on ECHO Program website. | Promote and monitor uptake of online tutorial. | Promote and monitor uptake of online tutorial. | Promote and monitor uptake of online tutorial. | Review material to determine if changes are needed. |
Page details
- Date modified: