COSEWIC annual report 2018 to 2019

COSEWIC: Committee on the status of endengered wildlife in Canada/COSEPAC: Comité de la situtation des espèces en péril au Canada

Cover letter

October 9, 2019

The Honourable Catherine McKenna
Minister of the Environment and Climate Change
200 Sacré-Coeur Boulevard
Gatineau QC K1A 0H3

Dear Minister McKenna,

My term as COSEWIC Chair began on September 1, 2018. In this role, I respectfully submit to you and the Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC) the enclosed 2018 to 2019 annual report of the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). The submission of this report fulfills COSEWIC’s obligations under section 26 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA), which requires that COSEWIC submit a report on its activities to the Minister of the Environment and members of CESCC annually. This annual report will also be available online through the SARA public registry.

As you know, COSEWIC’s role is to assess the conservation status of wildlife species in Canada. Under item III, Wildlife Species Status Assessments, of the annual report, you will find information on how to obtain a copy of the status assignments for the wildlife species assessed in 2018/2019, the applicable criteria and the reasons for the status designation. The status reports containing the information used in the assessments are provided in the accompanying email. The reports will also be provided to CESCC members and will be available on the public registry.

Over the past year COSEWIC assessed a total of 56 wildlife species, 2 of which were assigned a status of not at risk. Of these 56, COSEWIC re-examined the status of 25 wildlife species; of these, the majority (80%) were reassessed at the same or lower level of risk. To date and with the submission of this report, COSEWIC’s assessments now include 799 wildlife species in various risk categories including 356 endangered, 189 threatened, 232 special concern, and 22 extirpated (that is, no longer found in the wild in Canada). In addition, 18 wildlife species have been assessed as extinct, 59 wildlife species have been designated as data deficient, and 199 have been assessed as not at risk.

The submission of this information fulfills COSEWIC’s obligations under section 25 of SARA, which requires that COSEWIC provide the Minister of the Environment and the CESCC with a copy of the status assessments and the reasons for the assessments. It also fulfills our obligations under Section 24, which requires that COSEWIC review the classification of species at risk at least once every 10 years.

In the interest of improving the annual report process, we would appreciate your feedback on the usefulness of this report to you and whether you see any opportunities to make the process more streamlined.

On behalf of the committee, I would again like to thank you for your continuing support for our work and the commitment of your ministry to the conservation and protection of Canada’s biodiversity.

Yours sincerely,

John D. Reynolds Chair, COSEWIC

Department of Biological Sciences
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6

c.c.: Silke Neve, A/Director General, Wildlife, Assessment and Information Directorate, Canadian Wildlife Service

COSEWIC Annual Report presented to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change and the Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC) from the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) 2018 to 2019

Item I: COSEWIC activities

1. Wildlife species assessment meetings

Section 15 (1) of the Species at Risk Act states: "The functions of COSEWIC are to (a) assess the status of each wildlife species considered by COSEWIC to be at risk and, as part of the assessment, identify existing and potential threats to the species and (i) classify the species as extinct, extirpated, endangered, threatened or of special concern, (ii) indicate that COSEWIC does not have sufficient information to classify the species, or (iii) indicate that the species is not currently at risk".

Under Canada’s Species at Risk Act (SARA), the foremost function of COSEWIC is to "assess the status of each wildlife species considered by COSEWIC to be at risk and, as part of the assessment, identify existing and potential threats to the wildlife species".

COSEWIC held two wildlife species assessment meetings in this reporting year (September 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019) from November 25 to 30, 2018 and from April 28 to May 3, 2019. During this reporting period, COSEWIC assessed the status or reviewed the classification of 56 wildlife species.

The wildlife species assessment results for the 2018-2019 reporting period include the following:

Extinct: 0

Extirpated: 5

Endangered: 24

Threatened: 11

Special concern: 12

Data deficient: 2

Not at risk: 2

Total: 56

Of the 56 wildlife species examined, COSEWIC reviewed the classification of 25 that had been previously assessed. The review of classification for 15 of those wildlife species resulted in a confirmation of the same risk status as the previous assessment (see table 1a).

Table 1a. Confirmation of status for wildlife species previously assessed:
Extirpated Eendangered Threatened Special concern

Frosted Elfin

Gravel Chub

Karner Blue

Paddlefish

Pygmy Short-horned Lizard

Brook Spike-primrose

Nooksack Dace

Rapids Clubtail

Vancouver Island Marmot

Wood Turtle

Fin Whale (Atlantic population)

Pale Yellow Dune Moth

Polar Bear

Pygmy Snaketail

Sowerby’s Beaked Whale

Data deficient and not at risk:

In November 2018, COSEWIC assessed two wildlife species that were not assigned into a risk category and were newly assessed as data deficient: Chinook Salmon (Southern Mainland, Ocean, Summer population) and Chinook Salmon (Southern Mainland, Stream, Summer population). Additionally, two wildlife species were not assigned into a risk category and were assessed as not at risk: Chinook Salmon (South Thompson, Ocean, Summer population) was newly assessed as not at risk and Roughhead Grenadier was re-assessed as not at risk.

With the transmission of this report, COSEWIC provides assessments (see table 1b) of 37 wildlife species newly classified as extirpated, endangered, threatened, and of special concern to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change to consider whether to recommend to the Governor in Council (GIC) that they be added to schedule 1 of SARA.

Table 1b. Newly classified wildlife species for consideration of listing on Schedule 1 of SARA:
Extirpated Endangered Threatened Special concern
Not applicable

Carey’s Small Limestone Moss

Chinook Salmon (East Vancouver Island, Stream, Spring population)

Chinook Salmon (Lower Fraser, Stream, Summer (Upper Pitt) population)
Chinook Salmon (Middle Fraser, Stream, Fall population)

Chinook Salmon (Middle Fraser, Stream, Spring population)

Chinook Salmon (North Thompson, Stream, Spring population)

Chinook Salmon (North Thompson, Stream, Summer population)

Chinook Salmon (South Thompson, Stream, Summer 1.2 population)

Chinook Salmon (Upper Fraser, Stream, Spring population)

Columbia Quillwort

Dalton’s Moss

Drooping-leaved Beard-moss

Dwarf Hesperochiron

Hairy Paintbrush

Hairy Valerian

Rainbow Smelt (Lake Utopia large-bodied population)

Rainbow Smelt (Lake Utopia small-bodied population)

Sei Whale (Atlantic population)

Shortfin Mako (Atlantic population)

Ute Ladies’-tresses

Black Ash

Chinook Salmon (Lower Fraser, Ocean, Fall population)

Chinook Salmon (Lower Fraser, Stream, Summer population)

Chinook Salmon (Middle Fraser, Stream, Spring (MFR+GStr) population)

Chinook Salmon (Middle Fraser, Stream, Summer population)

Cryptic Paw Lichen

Hudsonian Godwit

Lake Chub (Atlin Warm Springs populations)

Lake Chub (Liard Hot Springs populations)

White-rimmed Shingle Lichen

American Bumble Bee

Chinook Salmon (Lower Fraser, Stream, Spring population)

Fin Whale (Pacific population)

Goldenseal

Greater Short-horned Lizard

Yellow Scarab Hunter Wasp

Yukon Draba

Information pertaining to the wildlife species assessed since the last annual report can be found on the SARA public registry website at the following address:

A to Z species index

For a copy of the assessment details for these wildlife species, including status assigned, reasons for designation (including uncertainties if applicable) and COSEWIC criteria with alphanumeric codes contact the COSEWIC Secretariat: ec.cosepac-cosewic.ec@canada.ca.

Status reports containing information on COSEWIC’s status assessments will be available on the SARA public registry at the following address:

Status reports

As of April 2019, COSEWIC’s assessments include 799 wildlife species in various risk categories, including 356 endangered, 189 threatened, 232 special concern, and 22 extirpated (that is, no longer found in the wild in Canada). In addition, 18 wildlife species have been assessed as extinct.

As of April 2019, 59 wildlife species have been designated as data deficient and 199 have been assessed and assigned not at risk status.

2. Important notes regarding status assessments

Section 27 of SARA states that the Governor in Council may, on the recommendation of the Minister, by order amend the list in accordance with subsections (1.1) and (1.2) by adding a wildlife species, by reclassifying a listed wildlife species or by removing a listed wildlife species, and the Minister may, by order, amend the list in a similar fashion in accordance with subsection (3).

During the period covered in this report COSEWIC did not inform the Minister about any details related to status assessments.

3. Other wildlife species assessment activities

Emergency assessments

Section 29 of SARA provides for the listing of a wildlife species based on an imminent threat to the survival of the wildlife species under an emergency basis. Section 30 (1) of SARA states that COSEWIC is to prepare a status report on the wildlife species and, within one year after the making of the order, COSEWIC must, in a report in writing to the Minister, (a) confirm the classification of the wildlife species; (b) recommend to the Minister that the species be reclassified; or (c) recommend to the Minister that the wildlife species be removed from the list.

No emergency assessments were conducted during the 2018 to 2019 reporting period.

4. Wildlife species assessments returned by the Governor in Council (GIC) to COSEWIC for further information or consideration

Section 27 (1.1) (c) of SARA provides for the Governor in Council to, on the recommendation of the Minister, refer an assessment of the status of a wildlife species back to COSEWIC for further information or consideration.

The Shortfin Mako, Atlantic population (Isurus oxyrinchus) was referred back to COSEWIC for further consideration (Canada Gazette, Part II, March 2019). Subsequent to this request, COSEWIC reassessed this species as endangered in May 2019.

5. Wildlife species selected for status report preparation

Section 15.1 (b) of SARA states that one of the functions of COSEWIC is to "determine when species are to be assessed, with priority given to those more likely to become extinct".

Following COSEWIC's process for prioritizing new wildlife species for assessment, 21 wildlife species from COSEWIC's Species Specialist Subcommittees’ candidate lists were chosen by the Committee for status report commissioning in 2019. The following is a list of those prioritized candidate wildlife species:

Candidate wildlife species
Taxonomic group Common name / Population name Scientific name

1. Amphibians & Reptiles

Canadian Toad

Anaxyrus hemiophrys

2. Arthropods

Sable Island Cutworm Mothi

Agrotis arenarius

3. Arthropods

Sable Island Leaf Beetlei

Tricholochmaea sablensis

4. Arthropods

Sable Island Eucosmai

Eucosma sableana

5. Arthropods

Large-lipped Sand Beetlei

Omphpron labiatum

6. Arthropods

Sable Island Boreri

Papaipemasp.

7. Arthropods

White-marked Tussock Moth, sablensis subspeciesi

Orygia leucostigma sablensis

8. Arthropods

A darkling beetlei

Ephalus latimanus

9. Arthropods

Hoary Edge

Achalarus lyciades

10. Arthropods

Valley Grasshopperii

Oedaleonotus enigma

11. Arthropods

White-winged Grasshopperii

Dissosteira spurcata

12. Birds

Gray-cheeked Thrush minimus subspecies

Catharus minimus minimus

13. Marine Fishes

Atlantic Mackerel

Scomber scombrus

14. Marine Fishes

Greenland Shark

Somniosus microcephalus

15. Molluscs

Bronze Pinecone

Strobilops aeneus

16. Molluscs

Globose Dome

Ventridens ligera

17. Molluscs

Pyramid Dome

Ventridens intertextus

18. Vascular Plants

Cleland’s Evening Primrose

Oenothera clelandii

19. Vascular Plants

Forked Bluecurls

Trichostema dichotomum

20. Vascular Plants

Rough-leaved Aster

Eurybia radulina

21. Vascular Plants

Short-fruited Rush

Juncus brachycarpus

i Part of the Sable Island arthropods bundle, which also includes the Sable Island Sweat Bee (Lasioglossum sablensae), which was assessed as threatened in 2014.

ii Part of Okanagan grasshoppers bundle

6. COSEWIC Subcommittees

Section 18 (1) of SARA requires COSEWIC to establish subcommittees of specialists to assist in the preparation and review of status reports on wildlife species considered to be at risk, including subcommittees specializing in groups of wildlife species and a subcommittee specializing in Aboriginal traditional knowledge.

Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittee

COSEWIC’s Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittee is responsible for ensuring that Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK) is appropriately accounted for in COSEWIC’s assessment process. The Subcommittee consists of members appointed by the Federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change. The co-chairs of the ATK Subcommittee are members of COSEWIC and provide COSEWIC with their expertise on ATK.

The following is a summary of activities over this past year:

COSEWIC extends its sincere gratitude to the members of the ATK Subcommittee for their ongoing commitment to ensuring COSEWIC assessments are informed by the best available information.

Species Specialist Subcommittees

COSEWIC’s Species Specialists Subcommittees (SSCs) provide taxonomic expertise to the Committee. Each SSC is typically led by two co-chairs and members who are recognized Canadian experts in the taxonomic group in question, able to demonstrate high standards of education, experience, and expertise and have a demonstrated knowledge of wildlife conservation. Members are drawn from universities, provincial wildlife agencies, museums, Conservation Data Centres, and other sources of expertise on Canadian wildlife species. SSC members support the Co-chairs in developing candidate lists of wildlife species to be considered for assessment, commissioning status reports for priority wildlife species, reviewing reports for scientific accuracy and completeness, and proposing to COSEWIC a status for each wildlife species. Currently, COSEWIC has 10 SSCs: amphibians and reptiles, arthropods, birds, freshwater fishes, marine fishes, marine mammals, molluscs, mosses and lichens, terrestrial mammals, and vascular plants.

For more information please see:

COSEWIC

SSC meetings take place annually in different locations in Canada or by teleconference held normally once a year. Observers are invited to attend and public information sessions may also take place.

Aside from their continued work to ensure that high quality status reports are brought to each COSEWIC wildlife species assessment meeting, SSCs also periodically undertake special projects aimed at assisting their work.

For example, the Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee initiated a cisco species flock analysis in the fall of 2014 to address the taxonomic challenges in this group of whitefishes. A Cisco Designatable Unit (DU) special report was drafted this past year and has been circulated for a jurisdictional review. The results of this Special DU report will be the basis for future cisco assessments as they relate to the pending Shortjaw Cisco, Upper Great Lakes Kiyi, and Blackfin Cisco status reports. This report is scheduled for presentation to COSEWIC in November 2019.

The Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee also initiated an assessment of threats to aquatic species in southwestern Ontario. The result of the threats assessment for this region is intended to assist writers when producing status reports for the assessment or reassessment of species by COSEWIC, recovery analyses, strategies, and action plans.

The Marine Fishes Specialist Subcommittee initiated designatable unit reports for Chinook, Coho, and Sockeye Salmon in Canada that have not previously been assessed.

The Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee undertook a special project to analyze and prioritize 71 vascular plants species using RAMAS software. Species for which the software analyses indicated their status would remain unchanged had technical summaries prepared. These results could be used to support the basis of rapid assessments (using various report types) to begin to address the backlog of overdue species reassessments.

COSEWIC is extremely grateful for the important work of the SSC members who provide their time and expertise on a volunteer basis.

7. COSEWIC operations and procedures

Section 19 of SARA states that COSEWIC "may make rules respecting the holding of meetings and the general conduct of its activities."

COSEWIC is guided in its activities by an Operations & Procedures (O & P) Manual that is reviewed annually by COSEWIC’s O & P Subcommittee, who recommend any necessary changes to the Committee for their approval. During this reporting period, the COSEWIC O & P Manual was updated to reflect some minor changes in COSEWIC’s procedures. The most notable changes are as follows:

8. Procedural working groups

Section 18 (1) of SARA also allows COSEWIC to establish subcommittees to advise it or to exercise or perform any of its functions.

Procedural working groups are essential to ensuring COSEWIC’s operations and procedures are efficient, effective and followed clearly, thus maintaining the quality and consistency of COSEWIC status assessments and processes.

a. Press release

This Working Group was active before and during each wildlife species assessment meeting on the production of each press release.

b. Species prioritization

This working group was active during the 2019-2019 reporting period. An annual exercise was conducted to evaluate the candidate species rationales submitted by the SSCs and to recommend new candidate species to COSEWIC for assessment.

c. Species bundling

The species bundling working group was not active during the 2018-2019 reporting period.

d. IUCN criteria and climate change

The Freshwater Fishes Subcommittee has conducted a pilot project with students from the University of Toronto to assess the costs and benefits of using formalized climate change vulnerability assessments in status reports. The results will be presented at the November 2019 species assessment meeting.

e. Data

A member of the data working group gave a presentation on sensitive species information to COSEWIC as well as the Nature Serve 2019 annual general meeting. This working group is still reviewing appendix F8 (updated guidelines concerning sensitive information) of the operations and procedures manual. They are also developing tools for data sharing agreements with third parties to improve COSEWIC’s data-sharing relationships with conservation partners and data owners.

f. Wild by nature

A revised version of the Manipulated Population Guidelines, including a name change to Guidelines on Manipulated Wildlife Species, was approved at the November 2018 COSEWIC meeting. It clarifies some of the concepts and terminology relating to captivity, supplementation, and reintroductions of population components, as well as hybridization between wildlife species. No new interpretation of the term "wild by nature" was included in this revision.

g. Co-chair evaluation grid

An updated version of the co-chair evaluation grid and the non-government science member evaluation grid were approved and used for the 2018 call for co-chairs and non-government Science members.

h. Supplementary information for status report writers

As of November 2018, the working group expanded and became the status report redesign working group. In collaboration with status report users, this working group is looking into ways to improve status report design.

i. Conflict of interest

Conflict of interest working group was not active during the 2018 to 2019 reporting period.

j. COSEWIC website

This working group was established to investigate options associated with having an external COSEWIC website. This new website is expected to go live before the end of 2019.

k. Wildlife Management Board process

Work is ongoing to improve communication with Wildlife Management Boards.

l. Criteria

This working group offered workshops for use of status criteria to most subcommittees at their annual meetings.

9. COSEWIC communications

Insofar as resources allow, COSEWIC and its chairs over the years have made every effort to inform governments and the public about the work of the Committee.

During the current reporting period, COSEWIC released two press releases outlining the results of the Fall 2018 and the Spring 2019 wildlife species assessment meetings. The links to the COSEWIC press releases can be found on the following COSEWIC website:

COSEWIC news and events

In September 2018, COSEWIC launched a Twitter account to inform Canadians about news on Canadian species at risk. The account can be found at COSEWIC twitter and now has over 1,450 followers.

The Chair of COSEWIC attended the following meetings (in person or via phone) and/or gave presentations on the work of COSEWIC:

In addition, the Chair of COSEWIC wrote the following correspondence regarding the work of COSEWIC:

In addition, the Chair of COSEWIC participated in the following media interviews regarding the work of COSEWIC:

Item II: COSEWIC membership

Section 16 of SARA states that (1) COSEWIC is to be composed of members appointed by the Minister after consultation with the Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council and with any experts and expert bodies, such as the Royal Society of Canada, that the Minister considers to have relevant expertise. (2) Each member must have expertise drawn from a discipline such as conservation biology, population dynamics, taxonomy, systematics or genetics or from community knowledge or aboriginal traditional knowledge of the conservation of wildlife species. (3) The members are to be appointed to hold office for renewable terms of not more than four years.

1. Membership changes

For a current list of members on COSEWIC, please see the COSEWIC website.

COSEWIC members

Members from the federal, provincial or territorial jurisdictions are recommended to the Federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change by the jurisdiction.

The Co-chairs of the ATK Subcommittee are elected by the ATK Subcommittee members and recommended to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change for appointment to COSEWIC. The Co-chairs and all ATK Subcommittee members are nominated by national aboriginal organizations with the exception of two of its members who can be nominated by the ATK Subcommittee. Subcommittee members are appointed by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change.

This past year a new Co-chair of the ATK Subcommittee has been elected by the ATK Subcommittee and formally appointed by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change to COSEWIC.

Species Specialist Subcommittee co-chairs and non-government science members are recommended to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change by COSEWIC following an in-depth review process.

A call for four Species Specialist Subcommittee co-chairs and one non-government science member was posted on the COSEWIC website between January 16 and February 13, 2019. Selection committees composed of both COSEWIC members and Species Specialist Subcommittee members then evaluated the applications following procedures set out in COSEWIC’s operations & procedures manual. The chairs of each selection committee prepared reports summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of the applicants, which were discussed at the Spring 2019 wildlife species assessment meeting. Candidates were ranked by COSEWIC members and their names and CVs were provided to the Federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change in May 2019 for consideration of appointment. Members of CESCC were copied on this correspondence.

Item III: Wildlife species assessments

In accordance with Section 25(1) of SARA when COSEWIC completes an assessment of the status of a wildlife species, it must provide the Minister and the Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council with a copy of the assessment and the reasons for it. A copy of the assessment must also be included on the public registry.

Information pertaining to the wildlife species assessed since the last annual report can be found on the SARA public registry website at the following address:

A to Z species index

The status reports will be available in English and French on the public registry at the following address:

Status reports

Item IV: Wildife species assessed by COSEWIC since its inception

In accordance with Section 25(2) of SARA, COSEWIC must annually prepare a complete list of every wildlife species it has assessed since the coming into force of that section and a copy of that list must be included in the public registry.

The Canadian Species at Risk publication is available on the Species at Risk public registry.

COSEWIC List of wildlife species assessed

It includes all wildlife species assessed by COSEWIC since its inception up to and including October 2018.

Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, seeking your opinion: feedback form

This section is not a functioning form. If you wish to complete the form, you must download the PDF file above.

Comment period: October 1 - October 31, 2019

Thank you for taking the time to read the COSEWIC Annual Report. Your views and suggestions are essential to the process of improving our Report. Please submit this feedback form to the COSEWIC Secretariat by e-mail (ec.cosepac-cosewic.ec@canada.ca).

How would you rate the ease of understanding this report?
Unsatisfactory 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent

How would you rate the usefulness of this report?
Not useful 1 2 3 4 5 Very useful

How would you rate the content of this report?
Unsatisfactory 1 2 3 4 5 Excellent

What did you like about the COSEWIC Annual Report?

What did you dislike about the COSEWIC Annual Report?

Do you have any ideas on how the COSEWIC Annual Report could be improved?

Page details

Date modified: