Species at Risk Act annual report for 2018: chapter 3

3. Listing of species at risk

The Act establishes Schedule 1 as the official List of Wildlife Species at Risk. Species are listed as extirpated, endangered, threatened or of special concern.

3.1 Listing process

The listing process refers to the addition, the reclassification, or the removal of a species from Schedule 1. Once the Minister receives the COSEWIC assessment, the Minister has 90 days to post a response statement on the Species at Risk Public Registry indicating how they intend on responding to each assessment and, if possible, providing timelines for action.

During this 90-day period, the relevant competent minister carries out an internal review to determine the level of public consultation and socio-economic analysis necessary to inform the listing decision. Timelines for action and the scope of consultations included in the response statement are based on the results of this initial review.

All of the species that COSEWIC assessed as being at risk prior to October 1999, were included at proclamation on SARA’s Schedule 2 (endangered and threatened) and Schedule 3 (special concern). COSEWIC reassesses these species using current criteria as part of the process to determine if they should be considered for the addition to Schedule 1. All Schedule 2 species have since been reassessed by COSEWIC. For Schedule 3, taxonomy for the four remaining species needs to be clarified before they can be reassessed by COSEWIC.

Figure 1 outlines the species listing process under SARA. Table 2 (see section 3.4) provides the status of the listing process for each batch of assessed species.

Figure 4. The species listing process under SARA

The Minister of the Environment receives species assessments from COSEWIC at least once per year.

The competent departments undertake an internal review to determine the extent of public consultation and socio-economic analysis necessary to inform the listing decision.

Within 90 days of receipt of the species assessments prepared by COSEWIC, the Minister publishes a response statement on the SARA Public Registry that indicates how he or she intends to respond to the assessment and, to the extent possible, provides timelines for action.

Where appropriate, the competent departments undertake consultations and any other relevant analysis needed to prepare the advice to the Minister.

The Minister forwards the assessment to the Governor in Council for receipt. This generally occurs within twelve months of posting the response statement, unless further consultation is necessary.

Within nine months of receiving the assessment, the Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, may decide whether or not to list the species under Schedule 1of SARA or refer the assessment back to COSEWIC for further information or consideration.

Once a species is added to Schedule 1, it benefits from the applicable provisions of SARA.

Note: More information, can be found on the SARA Public Registry.

Prior to undertaking public consultations and socio-economic analyses, DFO develops science advice in the form of a Recovery Potential Assessment (RPA) for aquatic species that have been assessed by COSEWIC as threatened, endangered or extirpated. The scientific information in a RPA includes, as an example, species status, threats and limiting factors to the survival and recovery of the species, recovery targets, and feasibility of recovery in given scenarios. The RPA informs the development of advice to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans regarding the listing of aquatic species under SARA and is used when analyzing the socio-economic impacts and during subsequent consultations. The RPA also provides advice needed to meet other requirements of the Act, including recovery planning and permitting decisions.

In 2018, DFO held three Recovery Potential Assessments peer-review meetings for: Redside Dace, Chilcotin River and Thompson River Steelhead Trout, and Warmouth.

3.2 Federal government response to COSEWIC assessments

On April 9, 2018, the Minister’s response statements to the imminent threat assessments for the Steelhead Trout, Thompson River population and the Steelhead Trout, Chilcotin River population were published on the SAR Registry.

In October 2018, the Minister received COSEWIC’s assessments for 76 out of the 90 assessed species in Batch 16. Of these assessments, 42 terrestrial and 34 aquatic wildlife were species at risk, which the Minister provided response statements for in January 2019.

Table 1 shows the species for which assessments and risk status were received from COSEWIC in October 2018. Species are grouped by the type of consultation the departments will undertake.

Table 1a: List of species for which assessments and risk status were received from COSEWIC in October 2018 for normal consultation
COSEWIC risk status Taxon English legal name Scientific name
Endangered Arthropods False-foxglove Sun Moth Pyrrhia aurantiago
Endangered Molluscs Striped Whitelip Webbhelix multilineata
Endangered Mosses Acuteleaf Small Limestone Moss Seligeria acutifolia
Endangered Vascular Plants Downy Yellow False Foxglove Aureolaria virginica
Endangered Vascular Plants Quebec Rockcress Boechera quebecensis
Threatened Lichens Smoker’s Lung Lichen Lobaria retigera
Threatened Vascular Plants Fern-leaved Yellow False Foxglove Aureolaria pedicularia
Threatened Vascular Plants Smooth Yellow False Foxglove Aureolaria flava
Special Concern Arthropods Red-tailed Leafhopper (Great Lakes Plains population) Aflexia rubranura
Special Concern Arthropods Red-tailed Leafhopper (Prairie population) Aflexia rubranura
Special Concern Reptiles Eastern Painted Turtle Chrysemys picta
Special Concern Reptiles Midland Painted Turtle Chrysemys picta marginata
Special Concern Vascular Plants Yukon Wild Buckwheat Eriogonum flavum var. aquilinum
 ↑ From Threatened to Endangered Amphibians Allegheny Mountain Dusky Salamander (Appalachian population) Desmognathus ochrophaeus
↑ From Threatened to Endangered Birds Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
 ↓ From Endangered to Threatened Mosses Spoon-leaved Moss Bryoandersonia illecebra
 ↓ From Endangered to Special Concern Reptiles Prairie Skink Plestiodon septentrionalis

↓ risk status downgraded
↑ risk status upgraded

Table 1b: List of species for which assessments and risk status were received from COSEWIC in October 2018 for extended consultation
COSEWIC risk status Taxon English legal name Scientific name
Endangered Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Bowron-ES) Oncorhynchus nerka
Endangered Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Cultus-L) Oncorhynchus nerka
Endangered Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Harrison (U/S)-L) Oncorhynchus nerka
Endangered Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Quesnel-S) Oncorhynchus nerka
Endangered Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Seton-L) Oncorhynchus nerka
Endangered Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Takla-Trembleur-EStu) Oncorhynchus nerka
Endangered Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Takla-Trembleur-Stuart-S) Oncorhynchus nerka
Endangered Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Taseko-ES) Oncorhynchus nerka
Endangered Mammals (marine) Grey Whale (Pacific Coast Feeding Group) Eschrichtius robustus
Endangered Mammals (marine) Grey Whale (Western Pacific) Eschrichtius robustus
Threatened Fishes(Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (North-Barriere-ES) Oncorhynchus nerka
Threatened Fishes(Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Widgeon River Type) Oncorhynchus nerka
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) European Whitefish (Dezadeash Lake small-bodied) Coregonus lavaretus
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) European Whitefish (Dezadeash Lake large-bodied) Coregonus lavaretus
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) European Whitefish (Little Teslin Lake small-bodied) Coregonus lavaretus
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) European Whitefish (Little Teslin Lake large-bodied) Coregonus clupeaformis
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) European Whitefish (Opeongo Lake small-bodied) Coregonus clupeaformis
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) European Whitefish (Opeongo Lake large-bodied) Coregonus clupeaformis
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) European Whitefish (Squanga Lake small-bodied) Coregonus lavaretus
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) European Whitefish (Squanga Lake large-bodied) Coregonus clupeaformis
Threatened Fishes (Marine) Lumpfish Cyclopterus lumpus
Special Concern Fishes (Anadromous) Bering Cisco Cyclopterus lumpus
Special Concern Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Francois-Fraser-s) Oncorhynchus nerka
Special Concern Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Harrison(D/S)-L) Oncorhynchus nerka
Special Concern Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Kamloops-ES) Oncorhynchus nerka
Special Concern Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Lillooet-Harrison-L) Oncorhynchus nerka
Special Concern Fishes (Anadromous) Sockeye Salmon (Nahatlatch-ES) Oncorhynchus nerka
↑ From Special Concern to Endangered Mammals Caribou (Dolphin and Union population) Rangifer tarandus
↓ From Threatened to Special Concern Birds Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor
↓ From Threatened to Special Concern Birds Olive-sided Flycatcher Contopus cooperi
↓From Special Concern to Not at Risk Birds Peregrine Falcon anatum/tundrius Falco peregrinus anatum/tundrius
↓From Special Concern to Not at Risk Mammals (marine) Grey Whale (Northern Pacific Migratory population) Eschrichtius robustus

↓ risk status downgraded
↑ risk status upgraded

Table 1c: List of species for which assessments and risk status were received from COSEWIC in October 2018 with status confirmed - no consultation required
COSEWIC risk status Taxon English legal name Scientific name
Endangered Amphibians Allegheny Mountain Dusky Salamander (Carolinian population) Desmognatus ochrophaeus
Endangered Birds Coastal Vesper Sparrow Pooecetes gramineus affinis
Endangered Birds Streaked Horned Lark Eremophila alpestris strigata
Endangered Birds Williamson’s Sapsucker Sphyrapicus thyroideus
Endangered Fishes (Freshwater) Redside Dace Clinostomus elongatus
Endangered Fishes (Marine) Basking Shark (Pacific) Cetorhinus maximus
Endangered Mammals (Marine) Harbour Seal Lacs des Loups Marins subspecies Phoca vitulina mellonae
Endangered Molluscs Banff Springs Snail Physella johnsoni
Endangered Reptiles Gray Ratsnake (Carolinian population) Pantherophis spiloides
Endangered Vascular Plants Tall Bugbane Actaea elata
Endangered Vascular Plants Tall Woody-heads Psilocarphus elatior
Threatened Arthropods Verna’s Flower Moth Schinia verna
Threatened Birds Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
Threatened Birds Northern Saw-whet Owl brooksi subspecies Aegolicus acadicus brooksi
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) Vancouver Lamprey Entosphenus macrostomus
Threatened Fishes (Freshwater) Western Slivery Minnow Hybognathus argyritis
Threatened Mosses Porsild’s Bryum Haplodontium macrocarpum
Threatened Reptiles Gray Ratsnake (Great Lakes/ St. Lawrence population) Pantherophis spiloides
Special Concern Birds Peregrine Falcon pealei subspecies Falco peregrinus pealei
Special Concern Vascular Plants Athabasca Thrift Armeria maritima spp. interior
Special Concern Vascular Plants Blanket-leaved Willow Salix silicicola
Special Concern Vascular Plants Floccose Tansy Tanacetum huronense var. floccosum
Special Concern Vascular Plants Large-headed Woolly Yarrow Achillea millfolium var. psammophila
Special Concern Vascular Plants Mackenzie Hairgrass Deschampsia mackenzieana
Special Concern Vascular Plants Sand-dune Short-capsuled Willow Salix brachycarpa var. psammophila
Special Concern Vascular Plants Turnor’s Willow Salix turnorii
Table 1d: List of species for which assessments and risk status were received from COSEWIC in October 2018 with no regulatory impact – no consultations (DFO)
COSEWIC risk status Taxon English legal name Scientific name
 ↑ From Threatened to Endangered Fishes (Freshwater) Carmine Shiner Notropis percobromus

↑ risk status upgraded

3.3 Public consultations

Public consultations provide the Minister with a better understanding of the potential social and economic impacts of possible changes to Schedule 1, and of the potential consequences of adding or not adding a species to the list. Information collected during consultations is used to inform the Minister’s recommendations to the Governor in Council on amending Schedule 1 of SARA.

In 2018, ECCC carried out consultations for 21 terrestrial species for which status assessments had been received from COSEWIC as part of Batch 15. The document titled Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act: Terrestrial Species – January 2018 was posted on the Species at Risk Public Registry.

In 2018, DFO consulted Canadians on the possible listing on Schedule 1 of six aquatic species. Consultations included those with other government departments, wildlife management boards, stakeholders, Indigenous groups and non-governmental organizations. Public consultations were also facilitated by inviting respondents to contribute to a web-based, species-specific survey hosted on the Species at Risk Public Registry.

3.4 Listing decisions

Governor in Council decisions on whether or not to amend Schedule 1 according to the COSEWIC assessments are published as orders amending Schedule 1 of SARA in the Canada Gazette, and include Regulatory Impact Analysis Statements. Decisions to not add a species at risk to Schedule 1 of SARA or to refer the matter back to COSEWIC are published in the Canada Gazettewith an explanatory note.

In 2018, final listing decisions were made for 45 terrestrial species. There were two orders amending Schedule 1 of SARA published in the Canada Gazette in 2018. Of the 45 terrestrial species included in these orders: 21 species were newly added to Schedule 1; 11 were reclassifications; 1 was referred back to COSEWIC for reassessment; and 12 were the subject of changes to their recognized designatable units.

Additionally, two proposed orders on whether or not to amend Schedule 1 of SARA according to the COSEWIC assessments for 40 terrestrial species on Schedule 1 were published in the Canada Gazette, Part I for public comment. The comments received will inform final listing decisions for these species. In May 2018, 31 terrestrial species were proposed for addition to, reclassification, or removal from Schedule 1 of SARA. In December 2018, an additional nine terrestrial species were proposed for addition or reclassification to Schedule 1 of SARA. Final decisions for these 40 species are expected in 2019.

Table 2 shows the number of species at each stage of the listing process for Batches 1 to 16 at year-end 2018.

Table 2. Listing processes for species at risk at year-end 2018 (Batches 1 to 16)
Batch and year of Minister’s receipt Total number of species assesseda Assessed as at risk Confirmation of current status Added to Schedule 1 Uplisted (to a higher risk category) Downlisted (to a lower risk category) Not listed Referred back Listing decision pending
(Proclamation) 0
233 0
233 0
0
0
0
0
Batch 1 (2004) 115 95 4 75 0 0 8b 8b 0
Batch 2 (2004) 59 51 (+9) 0 47 0 0 13 1 0
Batch 3 (2005) 73 59 4 45 0 0 6 1 4
Batch 4 (2006) 68 (+5c) 59 4 39
2 0 1
2 6
Emergency Assessment (2006) 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Batch 5 (2007) 64 53 8 30
2 3
0 0 9
Batch 6 (2008) 46 39 14 19 3 0 1 0 3
Batch 7 (2009) 48 46 17 19
3 1 0 0 6
Batch 8 (2010) 79 78 34 18 4
5 2
0 14
Batch 9 (2011) 92 81 31 16 5
6
1
3 19
Batch 10 (2012) 64 57 28 9
4
5
0 1
9
Emergency Assessment (2012) 3 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Batch 11 (2013) 73 67 32 13 2
0 0 0 18
Batch 12 (2014) 56 56 21 12 2
3
0 0 16
Batch 13 (2015) 56 54 23 2
1
0 0 0 11
Batch 14 (2016) 45 38 7
0 0 0 0 0 18
Batch 15 (2017) 73 56 17 0 0 0 0 1 39
Emergency Assessments (2018) 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Batch 16 (2018) 88 75 26 0 0 0 0 0 50

a The total includes species assessed for the first time, species being reassessed and previously assessed species that have been split into more than one designatable unit.

b The totals listed as “Uplisted” (to a higher risk category) and “Downlisted” (to a lower risk category) also account for species that were subsequently split into more than one designatable unit with a corresponding change in status and were therefore treated as reclassifications (“uplisted” or “downlisted”). In addition, removals from Schedule 1 are counted here as “downlisted”.

c Includes four wildlife species that were not listed for further consideration from Batch 1 and reconsidered in Batch 2, and five additional wildlife species when one designatable unit received by COSEWIC was split into six for listing.

3.5 SARA Schedule 1 current status

When SARA was proclaimed in June 2003, Schedule 1 included 233 species. Starting in 2005, species have been added to the list every year, except in 2008, 2015 and 2016. As of December 31, 2018, Schedule 1 listed a total of 580 species.

Table 3 shows the numbers of species added to Schedule 1 each year by risk status as of December 2018.

Table 3. Numbers of species added to Schedule 1 each year by risk status (as of December 2018)
Year Risk status: extirpated Risk status: endangered Risk status: threatened Risk status: special Concern Total
June 2003
(proclamation)
17 107 67 42
233
2005 4 47 30 31 112
2006 0 18 14 12 44
2007 0 20 5 11 36
2008 0 0 0 0 0
2009 0 8 3 11 22
2010 0 11d 8 4 23d
2011 2 7 4 10 23
2012 0 11 2 5 18
2013 0 4 2 1 7
2014 0 3 0
0 3
2015 0 0 0 0 0
2016 0 0 0 0 0
2017 1 18 15
20 54
2018 1 15 11 17 44
Total 25 269 161 164 580e

d The Eastern Foxsnake was split into two populations. The new populations inherited the species’ status on Schedule 1 of SARA before it was split, and both new populations were uplisted in 2010. For the purpose of this table, one of the new Eastern Foxsnake populations was treated as an addition to Schedule 1.

e Although the total number of listed species (580) is correct, the total listed as extirpated, endangered, threatened and special concern is slightly different because the values presented in this table do not reflect status changes (i.e., uplisting or downlisting of a species).

Success story - Restoring ecosystems and species in Gulf Islands National Park Reserve

Point Pelee National Park is home to some of the rarest species of trees in Canada, including the Red Mulberry. By 2014, fewer than 20 non-hybridized Red Mulberry trees remained, hastening the race for park staff to locate, identify and save genetically pure specimens.

Parks Canada’s work with Columbus State University in Georgia was key in these efforts. One of the outcomes from collaborative research was the development of a tool that uses genetic identification to confirm whether selected trees are genetically pure Red Mulberry. This tool allowed parks staff to identify four new adult trees.

Another conservation task was the development of a process to propagate non-hybridized seedlings. Pure Red Mulberry tree flowers were protected from cross-pollination and then artificially pollinated by hand. The resulting seeds were collected, germinated and grown in a local greenhouse. Twenty-six of these pure Red Mulberry seedlings were planted in optimal habitat in the park. There are now over 150 one-year-old potential non-hybridized seedlings available for planting.

Parks Canada staff are continuing to learn about recovery, including which sites in the park are best for seedling survival and growth, and ways to protect the seedlings from browsing by hungry animals.  Parks staff will continue to use science and research to adapt efforts and share lessons learned to support recovery of the Red Mulberry.

Page details

2020-03-11