Biological test method for toxicity tests using early life stages of rainbow trout: appendices


Appendices

  1. Members of the Inter-Governmental Aquatic Toxicity Group (as of October, 1998)
  2. Environment Canada, Environmental Protection Service, Regional and Headquarters Offices
  3. Review of Procedural Variations for Undertaking Early Life-stage Tests Using Salmonid Fish
  4. Distribution, Life History, and Husbandry of Rainbow Trout
  5. Logarithmic Series of Concentrations Suitable for Toxicity Tests

Appendix A: Members of the Inter-Governmental Aquatic Toxicity Group (as of October, 1998)

Federal, Environment Canada

C. Blaise
Centre St. Laurent
Montreal, PQ

S. Blenkinsopp
Environmental Technology Advancement Directorate
Edmonton, AB

C. Boutin
National Wildlife Research Centre
Hull, PQ

C. Buday
Pacific Environmental Science Centre
North Vancouver, BC

A. Chevrier
Marine Environment Division
Hull, PQ

K. Day
National Water Research Institute
Burlington, ON

K. Doe
Environmental Conservation Branch
Moncton, NB

G. Elliott
Ecotoxicology Laboratory
Edmonton, AB

M. Fennell
Pacific Environmental Science Centre
North Vancouver, BC

M. Harwood
Centre St. Laurent
Montreal, PQ

P. Jackman
Environmental Conservation Branch
Moncton, NB

R. Kent
Evaluation and Interpretation Branch
Hull, PQ

N. Kruper
Ecotoxicology Laboratory
Edmonton, AB

D. MacGregor
Environmental Technology Centre
Gloucester, ON

D. Moul
Pacific Environmental Science Centre
North Vancouver, BC

W.R. Parker
Atlantic Region
Dartmouth, NS

L. Porebski
Marine Environment Division
Hull, PQ

D. Rodrigue
Environmental Technology Centre
Gloucester, ON

R. Scroggins
Environmental Technology Centre
Gloucester, ON

A. Steenkamer
Environmental Technology Centre
Gloucester, ON

D. St.-Laurent
Quebec Region
Montreal, PQ

G. van Aggelen
Pacific Environmental Science Centre
North Vancouver, BC

R. Watts
Pacific Environmental Science Centre
North Vancouver, BC

P. Wells
Atlantic Region
Dartmouth, NS

W. Windle
Commercial Chemicals and Evaluation Branch
Hull, PQ

S. Yee
Pacific Environmental Science Centre
North Vancouver, BC

Federal, Atomic Energy Control Board

P. Thompson
Radiation and Protection Division
Federal Natural Resources
Ottawa, ON

Provincial

S. Abernethy
Ministry of Environment and Energy
Etobicoke, ON

C. Bastien
Ministre de l'environnement et de la faune
Ste-Foy, PQ

D. Bedard
Ministry of Environment and Energy
Etobicoke, ON

M. Mueller
Ministry of Environment and Energy
Etobicoke, ON

C. Neville
Ministry of Environment and Energy
Etobicoke, ON

D. Poirier
Ministry of Environment and Energy
Etobicoke, ON

G. Westlake
Ministry of Environment and Energy
Etobicoke, ON

Appendix B: Environment Canada, Environmental Protection Service, Regional and Headquarters Offices

Headquarters
351 St. Joseph Boulevard
Place Vincent Massey
Hull, Quebec
K1A 0H3

Atlantic Region
15th Floor, Queen Square
45 Alderney Drive
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
B2Y 2N6

Quebec Region
105 McGill Street
14th Floor
Montreal, Quebec
H2Y 2E7

Ontario Region
4905 Dufferin St., 2nd Floor
Downsview, Ontario
M3H 5T4

Western and Northern Region
Room 210, Twin Atria No. 2
4999 - 98th Avenue
Edmonton, Alberta
T6B 2X3

Pacific and Yukon RegionFootnote 45
224 Esplanade Street
North Vancouver, British Columbia
V7M 3H7

Appendix C: Review of Procedural Variations for Undertaking Early Life-stage Tests Using Salmonid FishFootnote 46

1. Test Substance and Type of Test
Document Test Substance Test Type Test Duration
(days)
Birge et al., 1985 effluents static-renewal 9
USEPA, 1985a chemicals flow-through
static-renewal
~ 90
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 pesticides flow-through ~ 60
van Aggelen, 1988 effluents
receiving waters
recirculating ~ 60
ASTM, 1991a chemicals flow-through ~ 90
Birge and Black, 1990 cadmium
effluents
receiving waters
flow-through
static-renewal
28
Hodson et al., 1991 aromatic compounds flow-through 85
Paine et al., 1991 receiving waters static-renewal 7 to 10
Neville, 1992 copper sulphate
Na-dodecyl sulphate
2,4,5-trichlorophenol
static-renewal 12 to 15
OECD, 1992a chemicals flow-through
static-renewal
50 to 55
OECD, 1992b chemicals flow-through
static-renewal
~ 90
2. Test Species
Document Species Life Stage Age at Test End
(days)
Birge et al., 1985 rainbow eggsTable note a 9 (post-fertilization)
USEPA, 1985a rainbow/brook eggs/alevins/fryTable note b 60 (post-hatch)
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 variousTable note c eggs/alevinsTable note d 32 (post-hatch)
van Aggelen, 1988 rainbow eyed eggs/alevins ≤30 (post-hatch)
ASTM, 1991a variousTable note c eggs/alevins/fryTable note b 30 (post-swim-up)
Birge and Black, 1990 rainbow eggs/alevinsTable note a 4 (post-hatch)
Hodson et al., 1991 rainbow eggs/alevins/fryTable note e 28 (post-swim-up)
Paine et al., 1991 rainbow alevinsTable note f ≤12 (post-hatch)
Neville, 1992 rainbow alevins/fryTable note g 5 (post-swim-up)
OECD, 1992a rainbow eggs/alevinsTable note h 20 (post-hatch)
OECD, 1992b rainbow eggs/alevins/fryTable note h 60 (post-hatch)
3. Test Conditions
Document Test Volume No./Test Vessel No. Replicates
Birge et al., 1985 300 mL 50 4
USEPA, 1985a NI (not indicated) 60 2
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 15- to 30-cm depthTable note a.1 20(eggs) 30(alevins) 4(eggs) 1(alevins)
van Aggelen, 1988 180 L 100 1
ASTM, 1991a NITable note b.1 30 2Table note c.1
Birge and Black, 1990 300 mL 50 2 or 4
Hodson et al., 1991 14 L 200 to 300 eggsTable note d.1 3
Paine et al., 1991 1 L 20 5
Neville, 1992 325 mL 1 12
OECD, 1992a NI 30 2
OECD, 1992b NI 30 2
4. Test System
Document Exposure Chamber Test Container Special Equipment
Birge et al., 1985 deep petri dish 400-mL petri dish with mesh screens dilution/mixing system
USEPA, 1985a glass aquaria screen tray NI
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 glass aquaria screen on bottom glass jar with mesh or self-starting siphons oscillating rocker arm
van Aggelen, 1988 two 90-L plastic vert. incubation tray submersible pump tubs
ASTM, 1991a glass aquaria glass jar with mesh screen on bottom oscillating rocker armTable note a.2
Birge and Black, 1990 deep petri dish 400-mL petri dish with mesh screens dilution/mixing system
Hodson et al., 1991 glass aquaria kitchen sieve with nylon screen bottom NI
Paine et al. 1991 2-L glass beaker net plus petri dish bubble curtains
Neville, 1992 glass jar with 4 separate sections glass jar with mesh screen on bottom balance accurate to 10 µg
OECD, 1992a glass or other inert chamber glass or other inert vessel with mesh sides/ends oscillating rocker arm
OECD, 1992b glass or stainless steel chamber glass/steel vessel with mesh sides/ends oscillating rocker arm
5. Type of Control/Dilution Water
Document Water Type Hardness
(mg/L)
pH Min. DO Renewal Period
(h)
Birge et al., 1985 ReTable note a.3 or NwTable note a.3 101Table note b.2 7.7Table note b.2 >60% sat.Table note * 12 or 24 (St-RnTable note c.2)
USEPA, 1985a NW or DwTable note a.3 NI NI >90% sat. <24 (≥6 vol./d)
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 NW or Re 40 to 48 7.2 to 7.6 >75% sat. 12 (90%)
van Aggelen, 1988 RW equiv.Table note d.2 RW equiv.Table note d.2 RW equiv.Table note d.2 >60% sat. 96 (50%)
ASTM, 1991a NW, Re, DW NI NI >60% sat. <24 (5 to 10 vol./d)
Birge and Black, 1990 Re or NW 101Table note b.2 7.7Table note b.2 >60% sat. 1.5 h (FTTable note c.2)
12 or 24 (St-Rn)
Hodson et al. 1991 DW 135 7.8 to 8.1 NI 3 to 5.5 (95%)
Paine et al., 1991 DW and NW 65 6.0 to 8.0 >60% sat. twice/wk
Neville, 1992 DW or RwTable note a.3 135Table note e.1 NI >60% sat. twice/24
OECD, 1992a NW, DW, Re NI NI >60% sat. 24Table note f.1
OECD, 1992b NW, DW, Re NI NI >60% sat. 24Table note f.1
6. Temperature, Aeration, Dissolved Oxygen, and pH Adjustment During Test
Document Temp.
(°C)
Aeration DO of Control/Dilution Water Before Test pH Adjustment
Birge et al., 1985 12 to 13 150 bubbles/min near saturation NI
USEPA, 1985a 10 to 12 none 90 to 100% sat.Table note *.1 NI
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 10 ± 2 noneTable note a.4 near saturationTable note a.4 NI
van Aggelen, 1988 10 must be used near saturation NI
ASTM, 1991a 10 gentleTable note b.3 90 to 100% sat. NI
Birge and Black, 1990 13 150 bubbles/min near saturation NI
Hodson et al., 1991 10, 12, 15Table note c.3 NI NI NI
Paine et al., 1991 10 to 12 gentleTable note d.3 NI <6.0, >8.0
Neville, 1992 13.5 ± 1 none near saturation NI
OECD, 1992a 10 ± 2 (embryos)
12 ± 2 (larvae)
NI NI NI
OECD, 1992b 10 ± 2 (embryos)
12 ± 2 (larvae, juveniles)
NI NI NI
7. Lighting Conditions During Test
Document Intensity Type Photoperiod Dawn/Dusk
Birge et al., 1985 dark NI NI NI
USEPA, 1985a darkTable note a.5 NI 14h L/10h DTable note a.5 15 to 30 minTable note a.5
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 <216 luxTable note b.4 NI 16h L/8h DTable note b.4 NI
van Aggelen, 1988 dark NI NI NI
ASTM, 1991a <216 luxTable note c.4 incandescent NI 15 to 30 min
Birge and Black, 1990 dark NI NI NI
Hodson et al., 1991 NI NI NI NI
Paine et al., 1991 dark NI NI NI
Neville, 1992 lowTable note d.4 fluorescent 16h L/8h D NI
OECD, 1992a darkTable note e.2 NI 12 to 16h LTable note e.2 NI
OECD, 1992b darkTable note e.2 NI 12 to 16h LTable note e.2 NI
8. Feeding of Swim-up Fry
Document Feed Type Feeding Rate
Birge et al., 1985 NA (Not applicable) NA
USEPA, 1985a starter feed or brine shrimp 3 times/day at 4-h intervals
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 NA NA
van Aggelen, 1988 NA NA
ASTM, 1991a moist starter diet or brine shrimp >4% body weight/dayTable note a.6
(portions fed 4 times/day)
Birge and Black, 1990 NA NA
Hodson et al., 1991 starter diet NI
Paine et al., 1991 NA NA
Neville, 1992 brine shrimp 3 times/day
OECD, 1992a NA NA
OECD, 1992b NI 4% body weight/day
(portions fed 2 to 4 times/day)
9. Monitoring Water Quality During Test
Document VariablesTable note a.7 Frequency
Birge et al., 1985 T, DOTable note b.5 , pH, cond, hard, alk, concn daily
USEPA, 1985a T, DO daily
USEPA, 1985a pH, cond, hard, alk, TOC weekly
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 DO, pH, cond, hard, alk, concn weekly
van Aggelen, 1988 T, DO, pH, cond, hard, alk, NH3 , TOC, metals monthly
van Aggelen, 1988 concn 96 hTable note c.5
van Aggelen, 1988 PCB, pest source-dependent
ASTM, 1991a DO, pH, cond, hard, alk, NH3, TOC, concn, part, TDG weekly
ASTM, 1991a T hourlyTable note d.5
Birge and Black, 1990 T, DOTable note b.5, pH, cond, hard, alk, concn daily
Hodson et al., 1991 T, DO, pH, cond, hard, alk NI
Hodson et al., 1991 concn daily
Paine et al., 1991 T, DO, pH daily
Paine et al., 1991 cond, hard twice/week
Neville, 1992 T, DO, pH, cond daily
Neville, 1992 concn, metals, N, NH3, NO2, NO3, hard start/end of testTable note e.3
OECD, 1992a T dailyTable note f.2
OECD, 1992a DO, concn ≥3 times/testTable note g.1
OECD, 1992a pH, hard start/end of test
OECD, 1992b T, DO, concn weeklyTable note f.2
OECD, 1992b pH, hard start/end of test
10. Biological Observations During Test
Document Variables Frequency Endpoints
Birge et al., 1985 mortTable note a.8 daily mort.
USEPA, 1985a mort, defTable note a.8, no. hatch/swim-upTable note b.6 daily mort./wt.Table note a.8
USEPA, 1985a wt.Table note c.6 end of test  
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 mort, no. hatch, timed hatchTable note d.6/swim-upTable note b.6 daily mort/wt
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 pathol./histol./clinical effects weeklyTable note e.4  
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 wt.Table note f.3 end of test  
van Aggelen, 1988 mort, def daily mort
ASTM, 1991a mortTable note g.2, def daily mort/wt
ASTM, 1991a wtTable note h.1 end of test  
Birge and Black, 1990 mort, defTable note i, timed hatch daily mort
Hodson et al., 1991 mortTable note j, def, hatching daily mort/wt
Hodson et al., 1991 wt weekly  
Hodson et al., 1991 alevin body/yolk weight once  
Paine et al., 1991 mort daily mort/growth
Paine et al., 1991 body weight, yolk weight start/end testTable note k  
Neville, 1992 mort, def daily mort/growth
Neville, 1992 growthTable note f.3 start/end test  
OECD, 1992a mort, def, no. hatched, timed hatch daily mort
OECD, 1992a length end of test  
OECD, 1992b mort, def, no. hatch, timed hatch/swim-up daily mort/wt
OECD, 1992b wt end of test  
11. Statistical Endpoint for Test
Document Endpoint(s) Criterion
Birge et al., 1985 LC50, LC10, LC1Table note a.9
NOEC, LOEC
sig. diff.Table note *.2 from control
USEPA, 1985a NI sig. diff. from control by ANOVA
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 MATCTable note b.7 sig. or specified diff. from controlTable note c.7
van Aggelen, 1988 LT50Table note d.7, LC50 sig. diff. from control
ASTM, 1991a NI sig. or specified diff. from controlTable note c.7
Birge and Black, 1990 LC50, LC10, LC1Table note a.9
NOEC, LOEC
sig. diff. from control
Hodson et al., 1991 IC25, NOEC, LOEC sig. diff. from control
Paine et al., 1991 yolk conversion efficiency compared to control
Neville, 1992 NOEC, LOEC sig. diff. from controlTable note e.5
OECD, 1992a NOEC, LOEC sig. diff. from controlTable note f.4
OECD, 1992b NOEC, LOEC sig. diff. from controlTable note f.4
12. Validity of Test
Document Test Substance,
Variation in Conc.
Temperature
Variation
(°C)
Maximum
Control Mortality
Variation in
Control Weight
Birge et al., 1985 NI ± 1 ≤20% NA
USEPA, 1985a ≤20%Table note a.10 ± 1.5Table note b.8 ≤20%, ≤30%Table note c.8 CV ≤40%Table note d.8
Rexrode and Armitage, 1987 NI ≤2 20% CV ≤40%Table note d.8
van Aggelen, 1988 NI NI NI NI
ASTM, 1991a ≤30%; ≥50%Table note e.6 ≤1, 2, or 3Table note f.5 30%Table note g.3 NI
Birge and Black, 1990 NI NI ≤20% NI
Hodson et al., 1991 NI <1 ≤20% CV ≤28%
Paine et al., 1991 NI NI ≤20% NI
Neville, 1992 NI ≤1 <10% ≤15%
OECD, 1992a ± 20% of mean ± 1.5Table note h.2 ≤30%Table note i.1 NI
OECD, 1992b ± 20% of mean ± 1.5Table note h.2 ≤30%Table note i.1 NI

Appendix D: Distribution, Life History, and Husbandry of Rainbow Trout

Distribution

Rainbow trout are native to western North America, and are found from Baja California to Alaska. However, the largest numbers of fish are found from northern California into northern British Columbia, particularly in larger rivers and their tributaries, as well as lakes and streams. In central British Columbia, these fish are sometimes referred to as Kamloops trout. Rainbow have been introduced successfully around the world, and now frequent waters of all Canadian provinces as a result of intentional or unintentional releases. Populations spend their entire life in fresh water, although they can also frequent estuarine waters as juveniles or adults, and subspecies (i.e., steelhead) on both coasts of Canada run to sea and return to streams for spawning. In Canada and elsewhere, these trout are widely reared in hatcheries for stocking natural waters to support sports fishing. O. mykiss is among the most common species used in commercial aquaculture and is one of the standard species used worldwide for aquatic toxicity tests, particularly in Canada.

Life History

Rainbow spawn from late winter through the spring. Spawning fish are usually three to four years of age and weigh 1.5 to 4 kg, but repeat spawners can be considerably older and larger in size. Fecundity is approximately 1000 to 1400 eggs/kg spawning female. Eggs 3.0 to 5.0 mm in diameter are laid in gravel redds. After hatching, alevins ranging from 80 to 175 mg (wet weight) remain in the redds until their yolk is absorbed, and emerge as 0.1 to 0.2 g swim-up fry in late May or June. Young hatched in streams commonly remain there for the first winter, after which they migrate to lakes. Fry and juvenile fish usually feed on insect larvae and zooplankton (e.g., daphids). Adults are known to feed on insects, crustaceans, and other fish (Carl et al., 1973); Gordon et al., 1987).

Young (to ~12 cm) have 9 to 13 dark oval parr marks along the lateral line, which are overlain by fine black spots on back and sides. A series of 5 to 10 median parr marks lie along the mid-dorsal line ahead of the dorsal fin. The dorsal fin has a dark leading edge in small fish (fry) and a series of distinct black bars or spots in older fish. Distinct white or pale orange tips appear on the dorsal and anal fins. One or two black spots are common on the adipose fin; with few or no spots on the tail. No red dashes are found on the underside of the lower jaw (Carl et al., 1973).

Husbandry

Stripping of Broodstock

Practical considerations might dictate that gametes for the toxicity test should be obtained from broodstock held and spawned at the test facility. If this approach is being considered, there are several important factors to take into account. Some of the more fundamental aspects of stripping broodstock fish are described here, but more detailed information on specific procedures should be thoroughly studied before undertaking stripping.

The seasonal availability of mature gametes depends on local situations and populations, and on hatchery practices (i.e., seasonal water temperatures and photoperiods). Certain hatcheries have successfully selected and manipulated different populations of broodstock to provide gametes year round.

Broodstock are normally sorted to separate males from females and ripe individuals from sexually immature ones. It is straightforward to separate the sexes and determine ripe males, but selecting ripe females for stripping takes experience and practice. If female ripeness is not checked at frequent intervals, there is a high risk of acquiring infertile eggs. Maximum fertility of eggs is achieved within a three- to four-day period, between 4 to 8 days post-ovulation. For optimal fertilization success, eggs taken for toxicity tests should be stripped during this 4- to 8-day period following ovulation. Allowing the eggs to over-ripen affects survival adversely, not only at fertilization, but also at the eyed stage through to swim-up fry.

Careful handling of the fish while checking for ripeness is essential; they are easily damaged internally, and broken eggs result in infertility. External signs of ripeness include a soft, enlarged abdomen, swollen and red urogenital papilla protruding from the vent, and spontaneous flow of eggs from the vent. Extruded eggs can be checked for ripeness by clearing them and examining the position of the germinal vesicle and lipid droplets in the yolk. Proper handling of broodstock and checking ripeness requires experienced personnel.

Stripping can be carried out with one or two people, depending on their experience. Typically, one holds the fish while the other performs the stripping. Eggs can be removed from the females by various methods, depending on whether the female is to be killed or anaesthetized. Excess force during stripping of eggs should be avoided. A mature male can be stripped more than once. If he is to be stripped again, a period of one week should lapse between stripping sessions, otherwise milt quality might be compromised.

Handling of Gametes

The procedure detailed in this report requires the fertilization of eggs just before the start of the test. This necessitates the coordinated and timely procurement and handling of unfertilized eggs and milt. Although gametes can be obtained from sexually mature broodstock held at the laboratory, it is frequently easier and less costly to obtain them from a hatchery, and transport the milt and unfertilized eggs to the test facility (see Section 2.2). Provided that care is taken and conditions are optimal, both milt and unfertilized eggs can be transported and stored for a few days before fertilization. Minimizing the storage period to as brief as possible (ideally, <24 h) is desirable, though, to enhance the likelihood of good fertilization success.

Milt, if handled and stored properly, normally maintains 70 to 90% fertility for at least five days. The sperm in freshly collected milt remains immotile in the seminal fluid, due to the fluid's potassium content. Subsequent quality of sperm is affected during transportation and storage by temperature, depth of milt in container, sterility of the container, and humidity. Lower temperatures (ideally, 0 to 4°C) allow longer storage of sperm. Even if shipped and stored cold, however, more stored sperm are required to fertilize a batch of eggs than if there were no delay in fertilization. Keeping the depth of milt in the container at a minimum (<6 mm) is important to ensure that the sperm receive adequate oxygen. Flushing the milt with oxygen is also desirable. The use of moisture-saturated oxygen or air can significantly increase storage time, since it helps to prevent drying of the gametes.

Unfertilized eggs can be transported and stored in much the same way as milt. Eggs should be collected as soon after ovulation as possible, since a decreased storage ability occurs as eggs ripen. Eggs should be shipped and stored chilled (0 to 4°C), no more than four layers thick, in insulated containers designed to minimize breakage. Unfertilized eggs, if handled in this manner, should retain normal fertilization rates for about three days. To maximize fertilization, stored eggs should be fertilized with fresh milt.

Fertilization

Although fertilization can take place with water, this technique must be avoided since it triggers closure of the micropyle before the freshly fertilized eggs are exposed to test solutions. Accordingly, the dry method of fertilization must be used. Using this method, it is recommended that the eggs from four or more femalesFootnote 47 (see Section 2.2) be spawned into a dry, clean bucket or plastic tray. The milt, from one or more vials containing motile sperm when activated (see Section 2.2), is then added. It is preferable to fertilize eggs with milt from more than one male, to improve fertilization success. However, sperm used to fertilize the eggs must be taken from only those vials (one to four, depending on sperm motility) for which sperm have been demonstrated to be active when mixed with fresh water or ovarian fluid (Section 2.2). Upon addition of milt, the gametes are gently mixed (e.g., by hand using clean surgical gloves; or using a goose-wing feather). A period of five minutes for mixing and fertilization is recommended (Fennell et al., 1998); although a period of up to 20 minutes for mixing and fertilization may be used (Birge et al., 1985). Fertilization should take place under low lighting intensity. Immediately after fertilization, groups of fertilized eggs should be transferred as quickly as possible to the test solutions. The transfer of all groups of freshly-fertilized embryos to the test solutions is normally achieved within 10 minutes or less per test (Yee et al., 1996), and must be completed within 30 minutes per test.

Various techniques have been used for transferring groups of freshly fertilized eggs to test solutions. Choice of technique is left to the discretion of the investigator, provided that it limits the pre-test exposure of newly fertilized eggs to water (for the purpose of washing off any unwanted debris or excess milt) to no more than 10 seconds, and enables all groups of eggs to be transferred quickly (i.e., as soon as possible, and within 30 minutes) to test solutions after fertilization (see Section 4.2). A proven and recommended technique (Canaria et al., 1996; Yee et al., 1996; Fennell et al., 1998) is to partially fill labelled weighing boats with each test solution, and then transfer groups of freshly fertilized eggs to the boats (one group per boat). A plastic scoop (e.g., for measuring coffee) or spoon is useful for this purpose, to enable the quick transfer of the approximate number of eggs required per replicate to each weighing boat. An initial count of eggs is made following each transfer. Once all groups of eggs have been distributed to the weighing boats, the number of eggs per boat is recounted and adjusted as required. Following an additional period of no more than 30 minutes (to ensure water hardening and minimize stress during that period; Fennell et al., 1998), the contents of each boat must then be transferred gently to its assigned test chamber.

Another recommended technique (Birge, 1996) is to transfer each group of freshly fertilized eggs from the fertilization chamber directly to the test chamber, using a suitably sized container (e.g., plastic scoop or graduated beaker with small holes drilled to enable draining or brief rinsing with water). To remove debris or excess milt, the fertilized eggs can be washed by dipping the scoop in control water which has been previously adjusted to the test temperature. Upon completion of all transfers, the number of eggs placed in each incubation unit can be counted and adjustments for numbers or appearance (e.g., size uniformity) of eggs made as necessary (see Section 4.2).

Incubation and Development of Embryos

Table D.1 provides guidance on the optimal and lethal temperatures for rainbow trout embryos. Water temperature is the major variable governing development of the embryos, and can be used to predict the time when the various stages of development are reached. Values vary between races of the same species. Table D.2 gives predicted incubation periods to achieve 50% hatch.

Embryos are especially sensitive to mechanical shock (physical agitation) at certain developmental stages. Embryos cannot be handled, stirred, poured, or transported without significant mortality during these sensitive stages. Sensitivity to mechanical shock has been found to occur at three stages of embryonic development, each successive stage being more sensitive. The first occurs 10 to 45 minutes after the immersion of embryos in water following fertilization. During this time, fusion of the male and female chromosomes takes place. The second stage occurs 2 to 72 hours after the embryos are immersed, at which time the cells are undergoing rapid division. The third and most sensitive stage occurs 4 to 14 days post-fertilization, when the embryo is undergoing rapid cellular differentiation. Sensitivity to mechanical shock decreases thereafter and is no longer detectable at and after the eyed stage is reached.

Since the embryonic developmental rate depends on temperature, the changes in sensitivity will vary for different incubation conditions. However, to minimize losses, any handling of embryos should be completed within 24 hours of immersing the embryos in the test solutions. Although the embryos are sensitive during this time, they are not overly so. Embryos should not be handled at all throughout the period from 24 hours post-fertilization until the eyed stage is reached.

Table D.1 Water Temperatures Affecting Development and Survival of Embryos Table note a.11
Lower LimitTable note b.9
(°C)
Upper LimitTable note b.9
(°C)
Optimum Temperature
(°C)
0.5 to 2.3 14.6 10.0 to 12.0
Table D.2 Predicted Incubation Periods at Constant Temperatures
Temperature
(°C)
Days from Fertilization
to 50% HatchTable note a.12
1 182
2 138
3 107
4 86
5 71
6 59
7 50
8 43
9 37
10 32
12 25
14 20

Appendix E: Logarithmic Series of Concentrations Suitable for Toxicity TestsFootnote 48

Column (Number of concentrations between 100 and 10, or between 10 and 1) Footnote 49
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
100 100 100 100 100 100 100
32 46 56 63 68 72 75
10 22 32 40 46 52 56
3.2 10 18 25 32 37 42
1.0 4.6 10 16 22 27 32
  2.2 5.6 10 15 19 24
  1.0 3.2 6.3 10 14 18
    1.8 4.0 6.8 10 13
    1.0 2.5 4.6 7.2 10
      1.6 3.2 5.2 7.5
      1.0 2.2 3.7 5.6
        1.5 2.7 4.2
        1.0 1.9 3.2
          1.4 2.4
          1.0 1.8
            1.3
            1.0

Page details

Date modified: