National Pharmacare Committee of Experts: Summary of affiliations and interests

In accordance with the Health Canada Policy on External Advisory Bodies, all members were asked to disclose affiliations and interests relevant to the mandate of the National Pharmacare Committee of Experts.

Members are expected to review their affiliations and interests against meeting agenda items and advise the Chair and Secretariat if they see a potential cause for concern regarding the integrity and objectivity of their participation. Based on this review, the Chair will decide, if necessary, to limit a member's participation in all or part of the meeting agenda. They will inform the member of this decision.

Summaries are provided for each member of the Committee of Experts based on the following questions.

1. Direct financial interests

  1. Do you, your spouse or common-law partner, or dependent family member have any direct financial interests that are of relevance to the mandate of the Committee of Experts, including current employment, investments in companies, partnerships, equity, royalties, joint ventures, trusts, real property, stocks, shares, or bonds?

2. Indirect financial interests

  1. Within the past five years, have you, your spouse or common-law partner, or dependent family member received payment for work done or being done, or financial support, from a party that has an interest in the mandate of the Committee of Experts? Include past employment, contracts or consulting, research support, personal education grants, contributions, fellowships, sponsorships, and honoraria for teaching, speaking, or writing engagements.
  2. Within the past five years, have you, your spouse or common-law partner, or dependent family member received materials, discounted products, gifts, or other benefits, or attended conferences or meetings where all or part of the travel and accommodation costs were provided by a party that has an interest in the mandate of the Committee of Experts?
  3. Within the past five years, have any of the organizations where you, your spouse or common-law partner, or dependent family member are currently employed or participate in internal decision making (for example: as a board member or as an executive or non-executive director) received grants or other funding from a party that has an interest in the mandate of the Committee of Experts?

3. Intellectual interest

  1. Within the past five years, have you provided any formal advice or opinion to industry; a Canadian federal, provincial, or municipal government; a foreign government; or a non-government organization on a matter of relevance to the mandate of the Committee of Experts? Include, for example, expert testimony or acting as witness (full or part-time), participation on an advisory body etc.
  2. Have you ever made public a statement (e.g. speeches, lobbying) or publicly stated a point of view (including in scientific papers, articles, journals, or other publications, or on other websites) on issues of relevance to the Committee of Experts' mandate?
  3. Do you currently have any professional or volunteer affiliations (such as membership in professional/scientific societies, trade associations, or in public interest, or advocacy groups) that may have an interest in the mandate and work of the Committee of Experts?

4. Other

  1. Do you, your spouse or common-law partner, or dependent family member have any other affiliations and interests or potential circumstances that might give a well-informed member of the public reasonable apprehension or grounds for concern regarding the integrity and objectivity of your participation on the Committee of Experts?
  2. Are you active on social media on issues relevant to the Committee of Experts?

Summary of affiliations and interests

Name Summary of Responses
Dr. Nav Persaud (Chair) 1a. 2a. 2b. 2c. 3a. 3b. 3c. 4a. 4b.
No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No
Comments
  • Receives research funding through the Canada Research Chairs program and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Published multiple articles related to medicine access, some of which have received media coverage
Amy Lamb 1a. 2a. 2b. 2c. 3a. 3b. 3c. 4a. 4b.
Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No
Comments
  • Owns 1 of 150 shares in Heritage Health Group Inc. pharmacy professionals who own and operate five pharmacies in Saskatchewan
  • Indigenous Pharmacy Professionals of Canada (IPPC) receives funding from a variety of sources for providing lectures, workshops, or consultant work from pharmacy sector stakeholders
  • Part of the Canadian Medical Association's Indigenous Guiding Circle. Honorarium goes directly to IPPC
  • IPPC received Telus Indigenous Communities Funding for our Elders' in Residence and Elders Circle
  • IPPC provides education and training on Non-Insured health benefits as well as jurisdictional funding disputes
  • Member of the Indigenizing Working Group for the Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network
Linda Silas 1a. 2a. 2b. 2c. 3a. 3b. 3c. 4a. 4b.
No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Comments
  • 2024, testified at the Standing Committee on Health (HESA) and submitted pharmacare brief to Seante Standing Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology (SOCI) on Bill C-64
  • President of Canadian Federation of Nurses Union (CFNU) - published reports such as "Body Count: The human cost of financial barriers to prescription medications" (2018) and held lobbying meetings with Ministers, Senators, and MPs
  • Member of the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC)'s Executive Committee and Canadian Council, CFNU and CLC have been advocating for universal pharmacare for many years
  • Media interviews and social media posts advocating for universal pharmacare in Canada

Page details

2025-05-22