proportion of in-person versus telephone interviews
Some reports from other sources in Canada include the experience of marginal food insecurity within the food insecurity classification. Our prevalence estimates of food insecurity don't include marginal food insecurity. So, the statistics gathered using the Household Food Security Survey Module are not directly comparable to the estimates from these other sources.
Number of people living in food insecure households
We ensured that estimates are representative of the Canadian population aged 12 years and older. So, survey weights were used to determine the number of people living in food insecure households.
From 2011 to 2012, 2.19 million people in Canada aged 12 and older lived in food-insecure households. Of these people:
1,415,000 adults and 180,900 children aged 12 to 17 lived in households with moderate food insecurity
545,300 adults and 49,900 children aged 12 to 17 lived in households with severe food insecurity
Food insecurity among children
Food insecurity status of children is determined based on responses to the 8-item child scale. In 2011 to 2012, 119,800 children aged 12 to 17 lived in households with food insecurity and were food insecure. Of that amount, 11,700 were severely food insecure.
Household food insecurity numbers
Canadian households are either food secure or insecure.
Food secure
Between 2011 and 2012, 91.6% of Canadian households were food secure. At all times throughout the year, these households had access to enough food for members to have an active, healthy life.
Food insecure
Between 2011 and 2012, 8.4% (1,098,900) of Canadian households were food insecure. Depending on the extent of the experience, food insecure households were either moderately food insecure or severely food insecure.
These households were sometimes uncertain of having, or unable to acquire, enough food to meet the needs of all members. This is because they had insufficient money for food. In these households, at times, food insecurity was experienced by:
both adults and children
adults or children (if present)
Moderately food insecure
Of Canadian households, 5.8% (760,100) were moderately food insecure. These households had indication of compromise in quality and/or quantity of food consumed.
Severely food insecure
Of Canadian households, 2.6% (338,700) were severely food insecure. These households had indication of reduced food intake and disrupted eating patterns.
Breakdown of demographic numbers
The characteristics chosen to reflect the household demographic breakdown include:
In Canada, the overall prevalence of food insecurity was higher in households with children (10.2%) than in households without children (7.6%). Households with children had at least 1 household member aged 17 years or younger.
In households with children, the prevalence of household food insecurity was higher in households:
with 3 or more children (13.4%) compared with 1 or 2 children (9.6%)
led by female lone parents (25%) compared to:
households led by male lone parents (11.8%)
this is data with a coefficient of variation from 16.6% to 33.3%, so interpret with caution
households led by couples (6.9%)
In households with children, the prevalence of severe food insecurity was 6 times greater in households led by female lone parents (7.9%) than households led by couples (1.2%).
Among households without children, the prevalence of food insecurity was higher for unattached individuals (11.6%) than for couples (3.6%). Households without children didn't have any household members aged 17 years or younger.
Income
At the national level, the prevalence of food insecurity decreased from the first (lowest) household income distribution decile to the tenth (highest).
The income distribution reflects a distribution of respondents in deciles. The deciles are based on the adjusted ratio of the respondents' total household income. These have been adjusted to the low income cutoff corresponding to their household and community size.
For each respondent, the ratio provides a relative measure of their household income to the household incomes of all other respondents. This income distribution is divided into 10 equal parts so that each part represents 1/10 of the sample or population. These equal parts are referred to as decile 1, decile 2 and so on.
In the first decile, more than 2 out of 5 (41.2%) food insecure households were considered severely food insecure. The relative proportion of severe food insecurity among food insecure households decreased with increasing household income distribution decile.
Main source of household income
Food insecurity was more prevalent in households in which the main source of household income was:
social assistance (58.3%)
worker's compensation or employment insurance (26%)
This is compared to households with other main sources of income.
Severe food insecurity (29.1%) was as common as moderate food insecurity (29.1%) where social assistance was the main source of household income.
Households with salary/wages (6.8%) and those with pensions/seniors' benefits (4.9%) as their main source of income experienced lower rates of food insecurity.
Highest level of education attained
The prevalence of food insecurity was lower with post-secondary graduation as the highest level of education achieved in the household (6.4%). This is compared to those with:
some post-secondary education (16.9%)
secondary graduation (11.6%)
less than secondary graduation (16.1%)
These statistics refer to the highest level of education achieved by any member of the household.
Aboriginal status
Among off-reserve Aboriginal households, 22.3% were food insecure, including 8.4% with severe food insecurity. These rates are approximately 3 times higher than among non-Aboriginal households where 7.6% were food insecure. Of this number, 2.4% of households had severe food insecurity.
An affirmative response to the question 'Are you Aboriginal (North American Indian, Métis, Inuit)?' was used to identify Aboriginal respondents. This therefore identified Aboriginal households. It's recognized, however, that other members of the household may not necessarily self-identify as being of Aboriginal cultural or racial background.
Immigrant status
The prevalence of household food insecurity was higher among recent immigrant households (10.9%) compared to non-recent immigrant households (7.6%).
An affirmative response to Statistics Canada's original indicator variable on immigrant status was used to identify immigrant respondents. This was used to identify immigrant households. The indicator variable is based on a respondent's country of birth and Canadian citizenship at birth. Recent was defined as less than 5 years in Canada.
Home ownership
Not owning a dwelling was related to higher rates of food insecurity. In this situation, 18.7% of households were considered food insecure, compared to 3.7% of households where the dwelling was owned.
Area of residence
Overall, households in urban areas had a higher prevalence of food insecurity (8.7%) than those in rural areas (6.6%).
Urban areas are continuously built-up areas. They have a population concentration of 1,000 or more and a population density of 300 or more per square kilometre. This is based on current census population counts. All other areas are considered rural.
Prevalence in the provinces and territories
Household food insecurity in the provinces ranged from 7.8% in Manitoba and Newfoundland to 11.6% in Nova Scotia.
In the territories, the prevalence of food insecurity was:
11.3% in the Yukon
13.4% in the Northwest Territories
37.2% in Nunavut
In Nunavut, because of operational difficulties inherent to remote locales, only the largest communities are covered by the survey. This includes:
Arviat
Iqaluit
Igloolik
Kugluktuk
Pond Inlet
Baker Lake
Pangnirtung
Rankin Inlet
Cape Dorset
Cambridge Bay
Food insecurity was higher than the national average in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and all the territories. The rate of food insecurity in the other provinces was similar to the national average.
Detailed summary data tables on household food insecurity in Canada from 2011 to 2012 are available. You can order them from Health Canada's Office of Nutrition Policy and Promotion.