Evaluation of the Grant to Quebec – Management response
NOTE: Ministère de l’Immigration, de la Diversité et de l’Inclusion (MIDI) is the new name of the Ministère de l’Immigration et des Communautés culturelles (MICC).
Recommendations | Response | Action | Accountability | Completion date |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Given current FPT efforts to develop common settlement outcomes and indicators at the national level, it is recommended that CIC continue to engage the government of Quebec in discussing these common outcomes and indicators and in sharing information for the purpose of measuring and reporting on results achieved. | CIC agrees with this recommendation and will continue to engage all PTs, including Quebec, in the discussion on common settlement and integration outcomes and finding ways to measure results for newcomers across Canada. |
|
Integration Branch | Two annual FPT face-to-face meetings and biweekly teleconferences |
|
Integration Branch | (first meeting held in February 2012; next meeting tbc) | ||
|
Integration Branch | Next SIJPPC meeting November 21-23, 2012 |
||
|
Integration Branch | Summer/fall 2012 (expected results Spring 2013) |
||
|
Integration Branch | Summer/fall 2012 | ||
2. In order to help confirm that the reception and integration services provided by Quebec correspond, when considered in their entirety, with those provided by Canada elsewhere in the country, it is recommended that CIC:
|
CIC agrees that an annual review of services as mandated in the Canada-Quebec Accord clearly requires the Joint Committee (Comité mixte) to study/re-examine, on an annual basis, the reception and integration services provided by Canada and Quebec (Annex A, art.3.g and 23.b). Such an annual review would ensure that services offered by Quebec, and compensated by the grant (a) correspond to the services offered by Canada in the rest of the country, when considered in their entirety; b) continue to be reasonable; and (c) are offered without discrimination to any permanent resident of Quebec, whether or not that permanent resident has been selected by Quebec. |
|
IIR | Q4 – 2012/13 |
|
IIR | Joint Committee report expected in Q4 2013/14 | ||
|
Integration Branch | Following the submission of the Joint Committee report | ||
CIC and the MICC have established an enduring bilateral collaboration in a number of key program areas
|
Integration Branch | Multi-annual meetings and ongoing collaboration (last meeting June 6, 2012) | ||
|
Integration Branch Eastern Region |
Ongoing | ||
|
Integration Branch and Citizenship | Bi-annual meetings | ||
3. It is recommended that CIC determine how the accountability requirements of the FAA apply to the grant, given that the province of Quebec is not required to report on settlement and integration outcomes of the grant | CIC agrees with this recommendation. There are considerable challenges in collecting information on settlement and integration outcomes both in Quebec and the rest of Canada that cannot be underestimated. The Financial Administration Act (FAA) requires federal government departments to review all grants and contributions for which they are responsible. CIC cannot fully meet the FAA requirement, since there is no formal accountability mechanism built into the Canada-Quebec Accord for Quebec to report on settlement and integration outcomes resulting from federal funding. According to art. 6.7.4 of the Directive on Transfer Payments, the government needs to ensure “that accountability mechanisms are appropriately limited when transfer payments to other levels of government are to be unconditional”. However, CIC may explore existing collaborative forums to encourage further sharing of information with the province of Quebec. |
|
Integration Branch | (tbc) |
|
IIR | Q3 – 2012/13 (engagement through bilateral DM meeting ); Follow-up through monthly bilateral ADM calls |
||
|
Integration Branch | Next SIJPPC meeting November 21-23, 2012 | ||
IIR Eastern region |
Next Joint Committee meeting February 2013 |
Page details
- Date modified: