CIMM – Parliamentary Context – October 21, 2025

Committee & Appearance Overview

About the Committee

Committee Mandate

CIMM studies and reports on all matters relating to the mandate, management and operation of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) and the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB).

Motion for this Study

That, pursuant to Standing Order 108(2), the committee undertake a study to examine ways to improve the order, fairness, and effectiveness of Canada’s immigration system, and, for the purpose of this study:

About the Appearance

Environmental Scan

The scope of the committee’s motion for this study is broad. Parties will take the opportunity to pose questions on a wide variety of matters under IRCC’s purview.

The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) intervenes regularly on immigration in the House of Commons and can be expected to scrutinize IRCC at CIMM. The Party has recently focused its efforts on temporary immigration, with proposals to eliminate the Temporary Foreign Worker Program and to end birthright citizenship for children of temporary residents. The CPC have long connected immigration levels, and especially international student numbers, to healthcare wait times, house prices, and the labour market. They have also been critical on processing times, security integrity, and perceived bureaucratic inefficiency at IRCC.

The Bloc Québécois (BQ) are critical on immigration, with a focus on its alleged impacts on Quebec. The Party argues asylum claimants should be proportionately distributed across provinces rather than concentrated in Quebec and Ontario. They express concern about the number of asylum claimants entering Quebec generally and point to claims’ processing times as an area in need of improvement. The BQ have recently contended changes to the international student program are damaging Quebec’s educational institutions and do not accommodate the province’s unique needs.

Liberal Party of Canada (LPC) MPs have been supportive of the government’s measures on immigration and tend to advocate for them in the House of Commons and at committee.

Appearance Details

The Deputy Minister will deliver a 5-minute opening statement, followed by rounds of questioning from committee members. The meeting is set for one hour only, with Public Safety officials following the second hour. The below officials are recommended to appear to support the DM:

Conservative Party of Canada

Membership

The Hon. Michelle Rempel Garner

Calgary Nose Hill, AB
Vice-Chair of CIMM
Shadow Minister for Citizenship and Immigration

Michael Ma

Markham—Unionville, ON
Member

Costas Menegakis

Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON
Member

Brad Redekopp

Saskatoon West, SK
Member of CIMM
Associate Shadow Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

Bloc Quebecois

Alexis-Brunelle-Duceppe

Lac Saint-Jean, QC
Vice-Chair of CIMM
Critic for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

New Democratic Party

Jenny Kwan

Vancouver East, BC
Critic for Immigration, Refugees, and Housing

Not currently a member of CIMM

Liberal Party of Canada

Julie Dzerowicz

Davenport, ON
Chair of CIMM

Peter Fragiskatos

London Centre, ON
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship
Member

Amandeep Sodhi

Brampton Centre, ON
Member

Salma Zahid

Scarborough Centre—Don Valley East, ON
Member

Sameer Zuberi

Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC
Member

Conservative Party of Canada

Top Party Issues

Since the conclusion of the 2025 federal election, the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) has been vocal on immigration. The Party has regularly linked immigration to housing shortages, healthcare wait times, and unemployment.

The CPC have recently focused on their proposals to eliminate the Temporary Foreign Worker Program and to abolish birthright citizenship for children of temporary residents.

The Party’s Shadow Minister for Immigration, Michelle Rempel-Garner, has indicated more immigration-related policy proposals are coming from the CPC soon. Below are some key policy proposals the CPC put forth during the last campaign:

Processing Times and Client Service

Border / Asylum Issues

French Immigration

Settlement and Integration

Levels

Recent Party Activity

CPC Immigration Shadow Minister Michelle Rempel-Garner posts about IRCC matters numerous times a day on her X account.

October 10 – X: Posted the CPC would end “birth tourism” and restore the integrity of Canadian citizenship (Poilievre).

October 9 – Oral Questions: Asked the government to align with other jurisdictions in requiring one parent to be a citizen or permanent resident for a child to be granted citizenship by birthright (Rempel-Garner).

October 7 – X: Shared a lengthy post on the rationale behind a CPC amendment to Bill C-3 that would end birthright citizenship. Framed this proposal as a CPC policy priority on immigration (Rempel Garner).

October 6 – Debates: Contended the immigration system is broken, pointed sympathetically to “vulnerable persons from Hong Kong, Ukraine and Sudan who have been left in limbo on their path to permanent residency” (Ma).

October 3 – Conservative Party Website: Publicized a letter to the Minister criticizing IRCC on passport delays stemming from a Canada Post strike (CPC, Rempel-Garner).

October 2 – Debates: Remarked the immigration system has been “destroyed” by high levels impacting housing, healthcare, and the labour market, as well as unvetted criminals entering the country (Poilievre).

October 2 – Oral Questions: Posed several questions on a Pakistani national listed as a sex offender in the U.K. who was granted a Canadian visa in 2023 (Rempel-Garner).

October 1 – Debates: Alleged the government’s immigration policy as led to the “importation” of foreign conflicts and hateful ideologies (Lawton).

September 17 – Debates: Argued that “the government planned to cap study permits in 2024 and then blew right past their cap by over 30,000 people” (Menegakis).

September 17 – Oral Questions: Said that the government has welcomed “unsustainable” numbers of international students without adequate housing available and pointed to a CBC report on “extreme abuse by landlords” (Kirkland).

September 9 – X: For a fifteenth day in a row, drew attention to a specific Canadian company trying to hire a TFW and contended IRCC’s Minister was allowing this practice (Rempel-Garner).

Bloc Quebecois

Top Party Issues

The Bloc Québécois (BQ) is frequently vocal on immigration. The BQ advocate for Quebec to have greater control over immigration. Most recently, the Party has raised concerns about the number of asylum claimants housed in Quebec, which they believe is suffering under a disproportionately large burden. They have also argued government measures on international students and temporary foreign workers impact Quebec negatively.

During the 2025 election campaign, the Party made the following commitments:

Temporary Foreign Workers 

Border / Asylum Issues

French Immigration and Quebec

Settlement and Integration

Recent Party Activity

October 9 – Debates: Argued changes to the international student program did not take into account Quebec’s education system and its differences, alleged IRCC officials were unfamiliar with CEGEP (Brunelle-Duceppe).

October 6 – X: Shared an article in La Presse about an increase in trucking related fatalities in Quebec. The article suggests banning temporary residents from trucking, and associates immigrants with a number of issues in the industry (Brunelle-Duceppe).

September 25 – Debates: Advised the BQ have asked for a moratorium on further adjustments to the TFWP to allow business to adapt, expressed concern about labour shortages stemming from fewer TFWs (Perron).

September 23 – CIMM: criticized the immigration system, stating that criminals dupe the authorities and the federal immigration department (Brunelle-Duceppe).

September 17 – Debates: Claimed that a “host” of international students arrived in Quebec with fake acceptance letters and then made asylum claims (Simard).

August 20 – X: Called on Prime Minister Carney to intervene with IRCC on a matter involving French speaking international students’ applications being delayed, jeopardizing their enrollment at the Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (Blanchet).

August 18 – Le Quotidien: Spoke with media outlet on delays facing international students from France, who’s applications were delayed to within a week of classes beginning at the Université du Québec à Chicoutimi. Pointed to layoffs at IRCC as a potential cause of long processing times (Brunelle-Duceppe) (Simard).

June 18 – Debates: Expressed relief the government is acting on border issues, characterized the refugee system as “not working” (Brunelle-Duceppe).

June 18 – Debates: Remarked that IRCC’s powers to suspend, vary or cancel visas and documents could impact immigrants selected by Quebec (Fortin).

June 9 – Committee of the Whole: Inquired about the status of IRCC’s client experience modernization efforts, remarking “I would like to know how the department spent $85 million in 2022 to hire people and reduce processing times, only to reduce the number of officers and increase delays in 2024. What happened to that $85 million?” Mentioned he would seek an answer to this question in committee (Brunelle-Duceppe).

June 9 – Committee of the Whole: Asked about the government’s targets for asylum claim processing times (Brunelle-Duceppe).

June 9 – Committee of the Whole: Contended asylum claimants are disproportionately residing in Quebec versus other provinces, and repeatedly demanded the government reimburse Quebec $500,000 for costs associated with the claimants (Brunelle-Duceppe).

Liberal Party of Canada

Top Party Issues

The Liberal Party of Canada (LPC) made the following commitments during the 2025 election campaign:

Refugees

Temporary Foreign Workers 

Processing Times and Client Service

Border / Asylum Issues

Digitization

French Immigration

Levels

Recent Party Activity

October 9 – Oral Questions: Asked about how Bill C-3 would promote fairness in granting citizenship (Joseph).

October 9 – Oral Questions: Contended Bill C-12 would protect the integrity of Canada’s immigration system (Malette).

October 2 – Debates: Pointed favourably to Bill C-2’s expected impact on Canadian immigration (Deschênes-Thériault).

September 16 – Debates: Remarked positively on a measure preventing international students from claiming asylum if they have been in Canada for over a year (Dhaliwal).

September 10 – X: Shared a graphic on the TFWP and said the Program ”has grown far beyond its original intent. Our government is rebalancing it—with stricter limits & new caps to protect Cdn workers and ensure a stronger economy & fair labour market” (Derkson).

July 29 – X: Highlighted an award received from the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project and remarked that Canada is a haven for those fleeing oppression (Zahid).

July 16 – X: Wrote the government remains committed to reuniting families and highlighted “IRCC will invite up to 10,000 sponsors under the Parents and Grandparents Program from the 2020 pool” (Dhaliwal).

June 20 – Oral Questions: Claimed that if members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are in Canada, they are here illegally and will be removed (Gasparro).

June 19 – Debates: Referenced past work at CIMM on Bill C-71 and encouraged parliamentary colleagues to support Bill C-3. Urged that no amendments be introduced to would slow the Bill’s passage (Kayabaga).

June 19 – Debates: Spoke at length on Canada’s legacy of immigration and support for refugees in the context of Bill C-3 (Dhillon).

Page details

2026-02-18