CIMM – Parliamentary Context – October 30, 2025

About the Committee

Committee Mandate

CIMM studies and reports on all matters relating to the mandate, management, and operation of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) and the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB).

Motion for this Study

That the committee undertake a study on the subject matter of Bill C-12, and, for the purpose of this study:

About The Appearance

Environmental Scan

The Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) has spoken critically on Bill C-12 at Second Reading. The Party has frequently levied criticism at the asylum system, arguing it functions as a backdoor economic immigration stream that invites dubious claims and fails to protect genuine refugees. They contend Bill C-12 will fail to fix the problems with the current asylum system and instead deflect responsibility to the courts, where the Party believes the Bill will face Charter challenges and further delays. The CPC overall contend Bill C-12 is a superficial, constitutionally flawed measure that would fail to restore integrity, and allow the asylum system’s dysfunction to worsen.

The Bloc Québécois (BQ) have generally been in favour of Bill C-12’s immigration related measures. They have suggested the Bill is a step in the right direction toward fixing the asylum system and help close STCA loopholes. BQ interventions have tended to focus on the disproportionate impact the Party says Quebec has suffered under the current asylum system. BQ members speaking at Second Reading have called for a more equal distribution of asylum seekers between the provinces, and proposed the Bill should include a mechanism to ensure this comes to fruition.

Liberal Party of Canada (LPC) MPs have spoken in support of Bill C-12, arguing it will improve the fairness and efficacy of the asylum system.

Appearance Details

It is anticipated that the Minister will be invited to deliver an opening statement, followed by rounds of questioning from committee members.  We recommend the following officials to accompany the Minister:

IRB officials have been invited to appear on a separate meeting.

Membership

Conservative Party of Canada

The Hon. Michelle Rempel Garner
Calgary Nose Hill, AB
Vice-Chair of CIMM

Michael Ma
Markham—Unionville, ON
Member

Costas Menegakis
Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON
Member

Brad Redekopp
Saskatoon West, SK
Member of CIMM
Associate Shadow Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

Bloc Québécois

Alexis-Brunelle-Duceppe
Lac Saint-Jean, QC
Vice-Chair of CIMM
Critic for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

New Democratic Party

Jenny Kwan
Vancouver East, BC
Critic for Immigration, Refugees, and Housing

*Not currently a member of CIMM*

Liberal Party Of Canada

Julie Dzerowicz
Davenport, ON
Chair of CIMM

Peter Fragiskatos
London Centre, ON
Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship
Member

Amandeep Sodhi
Brampton Centre, ON
Member

Salma Zahid
Scarborough Centre—Don Valley East, ON
Member

Sameer Zuberi
Pierrefonds—Dollard, QC
Member

Conservative Party Of Canada

Top Party Issues

Since the conclusion of the 2025 federal election, the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) has been vocal on immigration. The Party has regularly linked immigration to housing shortages, healthcare wait times, and unemployment.

The CPC have recently focused on their proposals to eliminate the Temporary Foreign Worker Program and to abolish birthright citizenship for children of temporary residents.

The Party’s Shadow Minister for Immigration, Michelle Rempel-Garner, has indicated more immigration-related policy proposals are coming from the CPC soon. Below are some key policy proposals the CPC put forth during the last campaign:

Processing Times and Client Service

Border / Asylum Issues

Levels

French Immigration

Settlement and Integration

Recent Party Activity

*CPC Immigration Shadow Minister Michelle Rempel-Garner posts about IRCC matters numerous times a day on her X account

October 22 – Debates: Noted Bill C-12 does not fix issues with the TFWP, alleged asylum claims are now at 296 000 compared to 10 000 in 2015 (Berthold).

October 22 – Debates: Argued Bill C-12 would only “pretend” to address issues including temporary residents making up 7% of Canada’s population, 500 000 undocumented persons, and 300 000 asylum claims (Ho).

October 22 – Debates: Emphasized the CPC would carefully scrutinize Bill C-12 at committee stage with the intent of protecting personal liberties and privacy (Falk).

October 22 – Debates: Said the priority for the government should be “reducing the number of ineligible or bad faith immigration applications so we can better fill vacant health care roles in urban, rural, and indigenous communities with qualified health professionals” (Morin).

October 22 – Debates: Remarked Bill C-12 is comprised of “the parts of Bill C-2 that had to be salvaged from the flaming dumpster fire of that original piece of legislation,” framed the Bill as “authoritarian” generally (Strauss). 

October 20 – Debates: Alleged Bill C-12’s introduction resulted from CPC pressure preventing the passage of Bill C-2 (Kaputo).

October 20 – Debates: Contended Bill C-12 is likely unconstitutional and therefore will have no impact on the asylum claim backlog, alleged the government is punting the issue to the courts (Rempel-Garner).

October 20 – Debates: Spoke at length on Bill C-12, expressing concerns on constitutionality, asylum processing backlogs, the interim federal health program, and the immigration system generally (Rempel-Garner).

October 20 – Debates: Emphasized the government should be blamed for any negative impacts of immigration rather than newcomers. Characterized the refugee system as overburdened and broken, alleged consultants, colleges, and employers have taken advantage of the system (Redekopp).

October 10 – X: Posted the CPC would end “birth tourism” and restore the integrity of Canadian citizenship (Poilievre).

October 9 – Oral Questions: Asked the government to align with other jurisdictions in requiring one parent to be a citizen or permanent resident for a child to be granted citizenship by birthright (Rempel-Garner).

Bloc Québécois

Top Party Issues

The Bloc Québécois (BQ) is frequently vocal on immigration. The BQ advocate for Quebec to have greater control over immigration. Most recently, the Party has raised concerns about the number of asylum claimants housed in Quebec, which they believe is suffering under a disproportionately large burden. They have also argued government measures on international students and temporary foreign workers impact Quebec negatively.

During the 2025 election campaign, the Party made the following commitments:

Temporary Foreign Workers 

Border / Asylum Issues

French Immigration and Quebec

Settlement and Integration

Recent Party Activity

October 22 – Debates: Remarked the BQ agree Bill C-12 is a “step in the right direction” to improving the asylum system but criticized the government allowing present backlogs to develop (Barsalou-Duval).

October 21 – Debates: Argued the BQ has long raised concerns about asylum and international student issues, framed these concerns as sensible policy proposals while the government pursued an ideological agenda (Simard). 

October 21 – Debates: Emphasized the BQ is committed to “improving [Bill C-12] at committee. Noted “Quebec welcomed 55% of the 180 000 asylum seekers in Canada in 2023 […] this has had an impact on public services, which are already saturated and overloaded, particularly schools, health care, and community services” (Larouche).

October 21 – Debates: Held that IRCC has been asking universities to act “like the police” and investigate those using the international student program as a path to claiming asylum. Also claimed IRCC refuses to share data with the universities (Blanchette-Joncas).

October 21 – Debates: Contended 40% of the total number of asylum seekers in Canada are in Quebec, which makes up roughly 20% of the Canadian population. Demanded more equal distribution of claimants (Barsalou-Duval).

October 21 – Debates: Proposed Bill C-12 should include a mechanism to ensure equal distribution of asylum claimants between the provinces (Simard).

October 21 – Debates: Said “we have seen that the asylum process increasingly became a completely separate immigration stream used to get around the regular immigration process. This was tolerated by the government and suited its purposes” (Barsalou-Duval).

October 20 – Debates: Pointed to the BQ’s longstanding calls for action on asylum claimants, expressed support for C-12’s greater privacy protections compared to Bill C-2 (Beaulieu).

October 20 – Debates: Signaled support for Bill C-12 but shared the BQ’s intent to consider whether sections pertaining to refugees should be amended at committee stage (DeBellefeuille).

October 9 – Debates: Argued changes to the international student program did not take into account Quebec’s education system and its differences, alleged IRCC officials were unfamiliar with CEGEP (Brunelle-Duceppe).

October 6 – X: Shared an article in La Presse about an increase in trucking related fatalities in Quebec. The article suggests banning temporary residents from trucking, and associates immigrants with a number of issues in the industry (Brunelle-Duceppe).

Liberal Party Of Canada

Top Party Issues

The Liberal Party of Canada (LPC) made the following commitments during the 2025 election campaign:

Refugees

Border / Asylum Issues

Temporary Foreign Workers 

Processing Times and Client Service

Digitization

French Immigration

Levels

Recent party activity

October 22 – Debates: Contended the legislative amendments proposed in Bill C-12 would continue to uphold Canada’s humanitarian tradition and due process while focusing resources on those who need them and improving confidence in the asylum system (McKinnon).

October 22 – Debates: Argued Bill C-12 meets contemporary challenges with respect to immigration, including a global surge in asylum seekers (Rana).

October 9 – Oral Questions: Contended Bill C-12 would protect the integrity of Canada’s immigration system (Malette).

October 2 – Debates: Pointed favorably to Bill C-2’s expected impact on Canadian immigration (Deschênes-Thériault).

September 16 – Debates: Remarked positively on a measure preventing international students from claiming asylum if they have been in Canada for over a year (Dhaliwal).

September 10 – X: Shared a graphic on the TFWP and said the Program ”has grown far beyond its original intent. Our government is rebalancing it—with stricter limits & new caps to protect Canadian workers and ensure a stronger economy & fair labour market” (Derkson).

July 29 – X: Highlighted an award received from the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project and remarked that Canada is a haven for those fleeing oppression (Zahid).

July 16 – X: Wrote the government remains committed to reuniting families and highlighted “IRCC will invite up to 10 000 sponsors under the Parents and Grandparents Program from the 2020 pool” (Dhaliwal).

June 20 – Oral Questions: Claimed that if members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard are in Canada, they are here illegally and will be removed (Gasparro).

Page details

2026-02-27